Bangladesh Goes 2-0 Up: An Emphatic Win for The Tigers

The Tigers surged to a commanding 2-0 lead in their five-match ODI series against New Zealand, delivering a comprehensive performance in the third game that left no room for doubt about their dominance. From the very outset, Bangladesh asserted control, showing no trace of complacency and maintaining their positive momentum throughout the match.

Shakib Al Hasan, once again displaying astute leadership, made a pivotal decision to bowl first after winning the toss. This choice bore fruit almost immediately when Shafiul Islam removed the dangerous Brendon McCullum, setting the tone for what would be a frustrating day for the visitors. As the pitch began to lose its initial pace, Shakib, with characteristic sharpness, introduced his spinners into the attack. The trio of Abdur Razzak, Suhrawardy Shuvo, and Shakib himself proved too much for the Kiwis to handle, reducing them to a state of bewilderment.

Although Ross Taylor and Kyle Mills attempted a rearguard effort to rescue New Zealand from the depths of collapse, they could only lift the total to a modest 173. Bangladesh's bowlers had done their job with clinical efficiency, exploiting the conditions and applying relentless pressure.

The chase, however, was a formality. Shahriar Nafees and Imrul Kayes constructed a spirited and assured hundred-run opening partnership that effectively extinguished any remaining hope New Zealand might have harbored. Their composed yet assertive batting ensured that the victory was not only inevitable but emphatic.

In the end, Bangladesh's triumph was a testament to their all-around excellence—an authoritative display of cricket that underscored their growth as a formidable force in the one-day format. It was a victory well deserved, achieved in resounding fashion, and one that sent a clear message to their opponents.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

VVS Laxman’s Grit and Grace: A Masterclass in Mohali’s Miraculous Test Victory

Guiding a sinking ship to safety, especially when surrounded by tail-enders, is no small feat. It demands immense mental fortitude and an unshakable calm—qualities that few possess. A calm mind, after all, is the most dangerous weapon in the heat of battle.

At 124-8, India found themselves on the brink of defeat, staring down a relentless Australian side while chasing a modest 216 in the fourth innings of the first Test at Mohali. VVS Laxman, however, remained at the crease. Stricken by a back spasm and forced to rely on a runner, Laxman’s mobility was compromised, but his resolve remained intact. His partner, Ishant Sharma, was hardly more than a novice with the bat—a bowler whose role was far from that of a saviour in such a dire situation.

To most, an Indian victory seemed all but impossible. Yet, as long as Laxman stood tall, hope lingered. And for the tail-enders, Laxman offered something more—security. His composed mind, though tested under extreme pressure, served as a lifeline, steering the team through turbulent waters.

The Australian pacers had tormented India with short-pitched deliveries throughout the innings, but those that troubled others barely fazed Laxman. His authoritative pulls against the short balls showed both technical precision and unwavering confidence. For the purists, his strokes were a masterclass—graceful yet lethal, simple yet impactful. His presence at the crease kept the Indian dressing room tethered to hope, even as the situation appeared dire.

When the final runs were struck and India secured an improbable victory, the jubilation in the dressing room was palpable. Laxman’s heroics had defied expectations and logic, sealing a remarkable win and pulling the game from the jaws of defeat.

This innings, etched into the annals of Indian cricket, was not merely about runs or survival—it was about defiance under pressure, composure in adversity, and a refusal to concede. For the Australians, it was a bitter pill to swallow; for the rest of us, it was a reminder of Laxman’s genius.

As I reflect on this astonishing performance, I can proudly say that I witnessed a master at work, one who refused to buckle under the weight of expectation and pressure. V.V.S. Laxman, take a bow—you have once again written your name into cricketing folklore.

Thank You

The Touch of The Master: Shakib Al Hasan’s All-Round Brilliance Powers Bangladesh to Victory in Series Opener Against New Zealand

Before the series began, Daniel Vettori astutely identified Shakib Al Hasan as the primary threat to New Zealand. His pre-series prediction proved accurate after the first ODI at Mirpur, where Shakib’s all-round brilliance decisively shifted the game in Bangladesh's favour. This encounter also marked a symbolic contest between two of the world’s finest all-rounders—Shakib and Vettori - with the former taking an early lead in this prestigious rivalry.

Shakib's performance was a masterclass in versatility. With the bat, he exhibited an array of shots during the critical batting Powerplay, propelling Bangladesh to a competitive total of 229. His attacking yet measured stroke play came at a time when his team needed a spark, lifting them from a precarious position. However, his true artistry was revealed when he had the ball in hand.

Shakib's bowling was a study in craft and guile, particularly during his pivotal double strike in the 15th over. The dismissals of Brendon McCullum, a danger in any format, and Grant Elliott, a steady presence in the middle order, shifted the balance of the game. Yet, his contribution didn’t end there. As the rain-threatened contest neared its conclusion, Shakib returned to deliver a sublime penultimate over, conceding just three runs while snaring Nathan McCullum. This moment sealed Bangladesh's defence of a seemingly modest total and handed them a much-needed 1-0 lead in the five-match ODI series.

The match, however, was not without its challenges. Bangladesh’s hopes of defending 229 took an early hit when captain Mashrafe Mortaza hobbled off the field after just one over due to a sprained ankle. In a seamless transition of leadership, Shakib took over the captaincy with calm authority. His field placements were sharp, and he astutely rotated his bowlers to maintain pressure on the Kiwis. Shakib demonstrated not only technical prowess but a deep understanding of the game's nuances, dictating play with a calm yet assertive hand.

Mirpur, on that day, witnessed the brilliance of a cricketing master. Shakib was at the peak of his powers—his batting dashing, his bowling beguiling, and his captaincy commanding. As Bangladesh look ahead to the remaining matches, all eyes will be on Shakib to continue his scintillating form, carrying the weight of his team's aspirations on his broad shoulders. Should he maintain this rich vein of form, there is little doubt that Shakib will remain the defining figure of this series.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Lion of Pakistan Cricket: Imran Khan and His Team

Modern Test cricket often resembles a school playground, where batting bullies prey upon fragile, under-supported bowlers. Yet, even amid these lopsided contests, there are limits: inflated figures may bruise egos, but they do not break bones. The 1980s, however, were an entirely different era. West Indies fast-bowling juggernaut turned cricket into a battlefield, a relentless war of attrition where batsmen bore the brunt of leather-bound hostility. When England crumbled in just three days at Sabina Park in 1986, Wisden Cricket Monthly likened it to "cricket's equivalent to the Somme." 

And yet, amidst the wreckage, there was one team that refused to be trampled: Pakistan. In three fiercely contested Test series between the late 1980s and early 1990s, Pakistan managed something no other team could—they did not lose a series to the all-conquering West Indians. 

West Indies' reign during this period has rightly earned its place in cricket’s pantheon, standing alongside the Australians of the early 2000s, the Invincibles of 1948, the lost South Africans of the 1970s, and England's mid-1950s dominance. Yet, the one team they could not subdue—Pakistan—remains curiously absent from these hallowed discussions. While Imran Khan’s 1992 World Cup-winning "cornered tigers" are celebrated, their triumph lasted a mere fortnight. In contrast, the Pakistani Test side of the 1980s held its ground for nearly 15 years, crafting a legacy of resilience that remains underappreciated. 

The statistics alone tell a compelling tale. Pakistan was the only side to win a Test in the Caribbean during the 1980s and the only team to escape a series defeat there between 1974 and 1995. They won a Test series in India in 1986-87—an achievement unmatched by any visiting side between 1985 and 2000. Between 1982 and 1993, they did not lose a single Test series outside of Australasia, a region whose extra bounce posed the greatest challenge for subcontinental batsmen. During this 11-year golden era, Pakistan lost just 10 out of 80 Tests and maintained an imposing record at home, winning 18 out of 39 matches with only two defeats. 

Of course, no discussion of that era can ignore the spectre of home umpiring. Before the advent of neutral officials, Pakistan was often accused of being a fortress where visiting batsmen found it nearly impossible to get an LBW decision in their favour. While the statistics—164 LBWs for Pakistan versus 78 for their opponents in the 1980s—suggest a degree of imbalance, they do not diminish the achievements of this formidable side. 

The Architects of Defiance

At the heart of this team stood two titanic figures: Imran Khan and Javed Miandad. They were cricket’s ultimate yin and yang—Imran, the aristocratic leader, a stallion of charisma and discipline; Miandad, the street-fighting schemer, a master of psychological warfare. Between them, they embodied Pakistan’s cricketing soul—regal and rascally, cerebral and instinctive. 

But this was no two-man show. The batting was built on patience and pragmatism: Mudassar Nazar, Ramiz Raja, and Shoaib Mohammad could grind out innings with a resilience that made even Chris Tavare look enterprising. Miandad and the enigmatic Salim Malik provided the stroke-making class, with Imran adding steel at No. 7. Saleem Yousuf, a combative wicketkeeper-batsman, added further grit. 

Their bowling attack was even more fearsome. Imran and a young Wasim Akram formed a pace duo that could swing, seam, and reverse-swing the ball at speeds that stripped the paint off bats. Abdul Qadir, the sorcerer of leg-spin, wove spells at the other end. By 1990, Qadir had departed, but in his place emerged an even deadlier weapon—Waqar Younis, a whirlwind of raw pace and toe-crushing yorkers. 

If there was a weakness, it lay in the lack of a settled sixth batsman or a fourth specialist bowler. But such was the strength of the core that they carried these minor imperfections with ease. 

Forgotten Epics: The Wars with West Indies

Pakistan’s three-Test series against West Indies—1986-87, 1987-88, and 1990-91—were cricketing masterpieces, dramatic and intense affairs played on a knife’s edge. In an era dominated by batting-friendly surfaces, these were rare, low-scoring dogfights. They had the tension and artistry of an HBO drama: in four of the nine Tests, the first-innings difference was 25 runs or fewer, and only one innings in the entire trilogy crossed 400. 

The 1986-87 series began with a seismic shock. At Faisalabad, Pakistan overturned a first-innings deficit of 89 runs to win by 186, bowling West Indies out for just 53—their lowest total at the time—thanks to Imran’s 4 for 30 and Qadir’s mesmeric 6 for 16. The Caribbean response was emphatic: in the second Test, Pakistan was bundled out for 131 and 77. The final match was a war of attrition, ending in a grimly fought draw as Imran and Tauseef Ahmed survived the final 90 minutes to deny West Indies a series win. 

Seventeen months later, Pakistan once again seized the opening act, winning by nine wickets with Imran taking 11 wickets and Miandad crafting a seven-hour 114. The second Test ended in a last-gasp draw, with Abdul Qadir fending off the final five deliveries to prevent defeat. The series climaxed in a nerve-wracking thriller, where Pakistan, defending 266, reduced West Indies to 207 for 8. But Jeff Dujon and Winston Benjamin conjured an improbable escape, salvaging the West Indian aura. Ironically, it was Pakistan who left that series feeling aggrieved at the umpiring—Qadir, in frustration, even punched a heckler, later settling out of court to avoid legal trouble. 

By 1990-91, Pakistan had lost Qadir but gained Waqar. Once again, they struck first, winning the opening Test as Waqar claimed nine wickets. The pattern repeated: West Indies stormed back in the second Test, and Pakistan clung on in the decider. It was a familiar script, but one with an unmistakable message—Pakistan could not be broken. 

Imran’s Last Stand

Imran Khan loomed over these encounters like a warrior king in the twilight of his reign. Despite a body battered by years of toil, he played every single Test in these series—something even the mighty West Indies could not boast. No one came close to his 45 wickets at an astonishing average of 14.87. He added 356 runs at 32.36, often rescuing Pakistan when all seemed lost. 

At 38, this was his final great act in Test cricket. He walked away having never lost a series to West Indies, having stood toe-to-toe with the most feared team in history and refused to yield. 

Pakistan’s 1980s team was a study in contradiction—chaotic yet disciplined, flawed yet formidable, a band of mavericks who thrived in adversity. They may not have the official title of "greatest," but in the echoes of history, their defiance against the greatest side of all speaks louder than statistics ever could.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

A Crucial Showdown: Bangladesh's Test of Resilience Against New Zealand

The arrival of the New Zealand cricket team in Dhaka for a five-match ODI series against Bangladesh brings with it a tapestry of historical rivalry and shifting dynamics. This series, taking place at the Sher-e-Bangla National Stadium in Mirpur, marks the third visit by the Kiwis, following their previous tours in 2004 and 2008. However, the context of this series is layered with complexities, particularly regarding the format changes imposed by the New Zealand Cricket Board, which has opted out of Test matches to focus on limited-overs cricket in light of the upcoming World Cup.

This decision raises pertinent questions about priorities in international cricket. Why, one might wonder, are the Kiwis prepared to engage in a two-Test series against India while declining a similar opportunity against Bangladesh? Such a stance could reflect a hierarchy in cricketing prestige that undervalues the potential competitiveness of the Bangladeshi side. Here lies an opportunity for the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) to assert its own standing in the cricketing world, yet historical tendencies suggest a reluctance to confront the issue directly.

 From a performance perspective, Bangladesh's cricketing journey since the Kiwis' last visit has been one of marked improvement. The 2004 series saw the Tigers on the receiving end of a harsh lesson in international cricket, suffering heavy defeats. Conversely, during the 2008 encounter, they showcased their resilience, notably winning the first ODI by seven wickets. However, inconsistency plagued their efforts, leading to a loss in subsequent matches and highlighting the temperament issues that have long been associated with the team.

The absence of Tamim Iqbal, a pivotal figure in the Bangladeshi batting lineup, casts a shadow over their prospects in the series. His brilliant form this season will be sorely missed, compelling the team to rely on players like Shariar Nafees and Junaid Siddiqui to step up. The challenge will be to transform potential into performance, a recurring theme in Bangladesh's cricketing narrative.

Statistically, Bangladesh appears to possess an edge in the top and middle order, boasting better averages and strike rates compared to New Zealand. However, the Kiwis' bowling, largely reliant on the experience of Daniel Vettori, presents a formidable challenge. The series promises an intriguing duel between two of the world's premier left-arm allrounders, Shakib Al Hasan and Vettori, with Shakib's recent success in county cricket positioning him as a key player for the Tigers.

Yet, despite these advantages, the question remains: can Bangladesh translate their potential into consistent performance? The team has exhibited flashes of brilliance, yet the inability to finish matches has often seen them fall short. This lack of a winning mentality - usually attributed to complacency or overconfidence - has been a significant barrier to their growth.

The lessons from the past, particularly the 2008 series where Bangladesh faltered after an initial victory, underscore the need for a robust mindset. As in life, each match is an isolated entity in cricket, demanding fresh determination and focus. To emerge victorious in this series, the Tigers must cultivate a temperament that embraces challenges and shuns complacency.

In essence, the upcoming ODI series against New Zealand is more than a mere contest of runs and wickets; it is a litmus test for Bangladesh cricket. Will they rise to the occasion, leveraging their home advantage and historical context to assert themselves? Or will the ghosts of inconsistency and missed opportunities haunt them once more? As the Tigers prepare for battle, the onus is on them to showcase not only their talent but also the resilience and mental fortitude required to overcome the Kiwis. The stakes are high, and the narrative of this series could shape the future trajectory of Bangladeshi cricket.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar