Chattogram Test: A Masterclass in Cricketing Drama

 The Chattogram Test between Bangladesh and England came to a dramatic conclusion on the 82nd over of the final day. Ben Stokes, England’s indefatigable allrounder, delivered a good-length ball that darted into Shafiul Islam after pitching. The ball struck Shafiul’s front pad, and the appeal that followed was as emphatic as the umpire’s raised finger. Kumar Dharmasena, who endured a torrid match with his decisions, adjudged Shafiul out, reasoning that he was not offering a shot. Bangladesh’s review was in vain, and so ended one of the most thrilling Test matches of the year. 

This match was a kaleidoscope of cricketing excellence: breathtaking all-round displays by two of the game’s premier allrounders, Ben Stokes and Shakib Al Hasan; the promise of two exceptional debutants, Sabbir Rahman and Mehedi Hasan; and a pitch that became the silent protagonist of an unforgettable cricketing tale. 

The Chattogram Pitch: A Silent Hero

In today’s cricket, the idea of a “good pitch” is often reduced to a batsman-friendly surface where runs flow freely, with bowlers left to toil in frustration. Such surfaces inflate batting averages but come at the cost of Test cricket’s essence: the battle between bat and ball. These sterile pitches frequently yield dull draws or lopsided contests, raising questions about the future of the game. 

Yet, history tells us a different story. The most enthralling Test matches have often been contested on pitches that challenged batters and empowered bowlers. The Chattogram deck was one such surface—far from the modern ideal, but a perfect canvas for the artistry of Test cricket. 

This pitch had everything: bounce for the new-ball bowlers, turn for the spinners, and just enough unpredictability to keep batters second-guessing. As the match progressed, the surface slowed down, but not excessively. It demanded skill, adaptability, and precise technique from the batters. Careless footwork or a misjudged stroke proved costly, while disciplined batting was richly rewarded. 

Unlike the proverbial minefields, this deck was balanced—it didn’t outright favour bowlers, nor did it allow for freewheeling stroke play. Instead, it demanded that batters play each ball on merit, employing late adjustments and flawless footwork. For bowlers, it offered just enough to make them an integral part of the narrative. 

A Test of Skills and Mental Fortitude

The pitch’s character infused the match with drama, pushing players to their limits. It reduced reckless shot-making, forcing batters to focus on composure and calculated shot selection. It tested their ability to leave deliveries, rotate strikes, and build partnerships—hallmarks of classical Test batting. 

Bangladeshi fans, who often delight in boundary-laden innings, found themselves cheering for subtler moments of cricketing mastery. Sabbir Rahman’s singles and twos, Mushfiqur Rahim’s patience in leaving deliveries, and Tamim Iqbal’s restraint with big shots drew applause. Similarly, the crowd was captivated by England’s ability to rotate strikes during Ben Stokes and Jonny Bairstow’s vital partnership in the third innings. 

This shift in perspective among fans highlights a broader lesson: Test cricket’s allure lies not only in flamboyant shots but in its nuanced battles. The Chattogram pitch underscored the value of patience, resilience, and strategic gameplay—qualities that elevate the format above its shorter counterparts. 

The Call for Sporting Pitches

The match rekindled a debate about the role of pitches in preserving Test cricket’s relevance. As Sachin Tendulkar aptly observed, “The wickets need to change; they need to be more helpful for bowlers. In T20s, the greatest of bowlers are being reverse-swept. Three hundred is no longer competitive in ODIs. So there should be at least one format where bowlers have a better chance of executing their skills.” 

Tendulkar’s words resonate deeply in an era where batting often dominates. A true contest between bat and ball is the lifeblood of cricket, and pitches like Chattogram’s are critical to restoring balance. A track that challenges both batters and bowlers creates a narrative filled with tension, unpredictability, and moments of brilliance—everything that Test cricket should aspire to be. 

Preserving Test Cricket’s Soul

The Chattogram Test was a reminder of why this format remains the pinnacle of cricket. The pitch, meticulously crafted by Bangladeshi curators, played a pivotal role in this epic encounter. Its balanced nature enriched the contest, forcing players to adapt and innovate while captivating spectators with its twists and turns. 

As Test cricket faces challenges from shorter formats, pitches like these must become the norm rather than the exception. They hold the key to ensuring that the oldest format of the game not only survives but thrives in an era of instant gratification. 

In the end, the Chattogram Test wasn’t just a match; it was a celebration of cricket’s purest form—a tale where the pitch itself was a co-author of history.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The Chattogram Test: A Story of Lessons Learned

After more than a year without playing a Test match, Bangladesh returned to the longest format, facing a seasoned England side. Despite the lengthy hiatus, the hosts fought valiantly, showing glimpses of resilience and growth. However, lingering regrets remain—this was a match they could have won, were it not for small yet significant lapses. 

One such moment occurred in the final stages of the game when England’s ring-field strategy entrapped debutant Sabbir Rahman. The field was cunningly set to tempt Sabbir into taking singles, a ploy designed not to target him but to isolate Taijul Islam, the less capable batter. This trap worked to perfection, as Sabbir failed to see through the tactic and fell into the snare. 

Criticism of Sabbir, however, must be measured. It was his first Test, and such nuanced strategies often elude even experienced players. Any other debutant might have made the same mistake. For Sabbir and the team, this was an invaluable learning experience, one that promises to refine their understanding of Test cricket’s subtleties. 

Silver Linings in Defeat

While the loss is disappointing, the Test also offered reasons for optimism. Bangladesh displayed notable improvements in batting discipline and tactical awareness—qualities often missing in their performances in the longer format. 

Historically, Bangladeshi batters have struggled in Tests due to an over-reliance on aggressive stroke play, often at the expense of staying at the crease. This impulsiveness has been a significant barrier to their progress. However, in Chattogram, a shift in approach was evident. 

The top-order batters showed admirable patience, focusing on survival and building partnerships through smart strike rotation. Against short-pitched deliveries, they moved expertly behind the line of the ball to defend. When faced with sharp turners, they used precise footwork to play the ball late, neutralizing the threat. 

These adjustments, previously absent from Bangladesh’s batting repertoire, signal a growing maturity. Such progress, though subtle, lays the foundation for long-term success in Test cricket. 

Chandika Hathurusingha: The Unsung Architect

Much of this transformation can be credited to coach Chandika Hathurusingha. Under his guidance, Bangladesh’s batters have begun to develop the patience and technique essential for Test success. His impact is evident, yet curiously underacknowledged by the mainstream media. Whether this reluctance stems from bias or oversight is unclear, but the coach’s influence cannot be overstated. 

Hathurusingha’s emphasis on technical and mental preparation has instilled a newfound confidence in the team. If this trajectory continues, Bangladesh will soon overcome the hurdles that have long plagued their Test cricket ambitions. 

A Lesson in Test Cricket’s True Nature

The Chattogram Test underscored that Test cricket is a battleground of attrition, strategy, and unyielding focus. It’s not merely about talent but about learning to adapt and thrive under pressure. Bangladesh showed they are capable of absorbing these lessons, proving that their potential in this format is far from exhausted. 

This defeat, though painful, is a stepping stone for a team still finding its footing in the demanding world of Test cricket. With continued introspection, better strategic planning, and the resolve to learn from setbacks, Bangladesh can look forward to a brighter future in the format that truly defines cricketing greatness. 

In the end, the journey matters as much as the destination, and Bangladesh’s journey in Test cricket, though challenging, is steadily moving in the right direction.

Thank You\

Faisal Caesar  

The True Test of Cricket: Bangladesh’s Struggle in the Purest Format

Test cricket—the very phrase carries an aura of endurance, skill, and relentless discipline. It isn’t merely a sport; it’s an art form that examines not just a team’s technique but its temperament, concentration, and character. Over five long days, teams are tested to their limits, often multiple times in a single session. This format is the cradle of greatness, where legends are born, and mediocrity is ruthlessly exposed. 

For Bangladesh, the journey in this hallowed arena has been fraught with challenges. Since being awarded Test status sixteen years ago, the Tigers have endured a tumultuous path. Unlike Zimbabwe, whose decline was largely shaped by internal discord, Bangladesh’s story is one of a slow struggle to meet the rigorous demands of the game’s longest format. Criticism has been a constant companion, yet despite the scepticism, they remain a part of the Test fraternity. On October 20, in Chittagong, Bangladesh is set to host England—one of the most formidable teams in world cricket—for a two-match Test series. 

A Tale of Two Formats

England, unsurprisingly, enters the series as overwhelming favourites. Their squad, brimming with seasoned professionals, is a stark contrast to Bangladesh's outfit. Yet, the interest in this contest stems from Bangladesh’s stellar performances in the shorter formats over the last year and a half. Since their breakthrough World Cup campaign in Australia and New Zealand, Bangladesh has emerged as a force in limited-overs cricket, their resurgence offering hope to other emerging cricketing nations. 

But herein lies the paradox: while their exploits in ODIs and T20s have been impressive, they do little to address the deficiencies in Test cricket. Success in the shorter formats, though rewarding, cannot mask the glaring gaps in a side’s ability to endure the rigours of five-day cricket. 

As the whites replace the coloured jerseys, Bangladesh finds itself stripped of its most dynamic pace options. Mashrafe Mortaza, Taskin Ahmed, and Rubel Hossain—bowlers who have thrived in the limited-overs arena—are either unavailable or unsuited to the demands of Test cricket. The absence of Mustafizur Rahman, sidelined by injury, further exacerbates the issue. 

Strength in Batting, Weakness in Bowling

A glance at the 14-man squad announced for the series reveals a familiar pattern. The top order, featuring stalwarts like Tamim Iqbal, Mushfiqur Rahim, and Shakib Al Hasan, inspires confidence. But as one reads further down the list, optimism gives way to concern. The bowling unit, conspicuously underpowered, remains the Achilles’ heel of this team. 

Shafiul Islam’s pedestrian medium pace, Taijul Islam’s struggling left-arm orthodox spin, and debutant Kamrul Islam Rabbi, whose first-class average of 40.89 hardly inspires fear, form the backbone of the attack. The burden on Shakib Al Hasan, Bangladesh’s talismanic all-rounder, is enormous. But expecting him to single-handedly take 20 wickets against a robust English batting lineup is unrealistic. 

The Defensive Mindset

Compounding the issue is Bangladesh’s defensive approach to Test cricket. Fielding teams with eight batters and three frontline bowlers has become a norm, the strategy centred on survival rather than victory. This mindset stymies growth, reducing Test matches to exercises in damage control rather than opportunities for competitive excellence. 

History has repeatedly shown that the most dominant Test sides—Australia in the late 1990s, and the West Indies in the 1980s—were built around formidable bowling attacks. A potent bowling unit, capable of consistently taking wickets, is the cornerstone of success in this format. Without it, no batting effort, however monumental, can secure victories. 

The ODI Conundrum

Ironically, Bangladesh’s rise in limited-overs cricket has, in some ways, hindered their Test progress. The spectacle of ODI and T20 success has overshadowed the grind of Test cricket, influencing young cricketers to prioritize the former. Role models like Taskin Ahmed and Rubel Hossain, whose skills are better suited to the shorter formats, further perpetuate this trend. 

Even within the cricketing establishment, there seems to be a tacit acceptance of mediocrity in Test cricket. The lack of investment in nurturing a versatile bowling attack reflects a shortsighted approach that prioritizes immediate results in ODIs and T20s over the long-term development of Test cricketers. 

The Road Ahead

As Bangladesh prepares to face England, the challenge is not just about competing with one of the best teams in the world but about redefining their approach to Test cricket. The English batting lineup, disciplined and relentless, will test the Tigers in ways they are rarely tested. Without a balanced and incisive bowling attack, Bangladesh’s strategy of relying heavily on batting depth is unlikely to succeed. 

Virat Kohli’s assertion that “a bowler wins you a Test match” rings particularly true for Bangladesh. Until their think tank places greater emphasis on nurturing quality bowlers and adopts a more positive approach to the format, their Test journey will remain an uphill struggle. 

Test cricket, after all, is a game of character—a format where teams earn their respect not by merely surviving but by fighting to win. For Bangladesh, the time has come to abandon defensive strategies, invest in their bowling, and embrace the true spirit of Test cricket. Only then can they hope to forge a legacy in the game’s most demanding format

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Tale of Strategy and Composure: England Triumphs Over Bangladesh in Chittagong

The third One-Day International (ODI) between Bangladesh and England in Chittagong carried the weight of anticipation and uncertainty. With the series delicately poised at 1-1 and heavy rains lashing the city for days, cricket fans braced themselves for potential disappointment. The weather threatened to overshadow what promised to be an enthralling decider, especially since England had declined to use the reserve day. Yet, fate smiled on the cricketing world as the rains ceased, and the toss unfolded amid roaring cheers, setting the stage for a battle of wits and skills. 

A Pivotal Toss and a Tactical Beginning

England's captain, Jos Buttler, demonstrated astute tactical awareness by opting to bowl first under overcast skies on a pitch offering bounce and carry. It was a decision rooted in pragmatism, as the track was expected to ease for batting as the game progressed. Bangladesh’s opening duo, Tamim Iqbal and Imrul Kayes, approached the innings with caution, adopting a traditional method of survival rather than capitalizing on the bounce. While their circumspection was understandable, it lacked the flair needed to seize the initiative against a disciplined English attack. 

Buttler’s foresight came into play as he exploited the subdued approach of Bangladesh’s openers. Ben Stokes’ clever cross-seam delivery to Kayes—paired with a fielder stationed strategically at short leg—proved to be the first masterstroke. Kayes’ misjudged flick epitomized how pressure can force errors, gifting England an early breakthrough. 

Tamim, on the other hand, found a rhythm and partnered with Sabbir Rahman to lift the scoring rate, unfurling a flurry of pugnacious strokes. However, England’s strategy was calculated: Buttler unleashed Adil Rashid, who baited Tamim with a loose delivery outside off. Tamim, in his aggressive intent, played a rash stroke and fell prey to the trap. The wicket highlighted England’s ability to outthink their opponents, even at the cost of conceding boundaries. 

The Middle Overs: Bangladesh Falters Under Pressure

Mahmudullah Riyad’s dismissal off a harmless long-hop underscored a frustrating trait of Bangladesh’s batting—impatience against mediocrity. Rashid’s ploy to serve occasional loose deliveries worked, as Bangladeshi batsmen repeatedly took the bait. Despite a brief revival by Sabbir and Mushfiqur Rahim, the innings lost momentum with the dismissal of Shakib Al Hasan, a pivotal moment engineered by England’s spinners. 

The latter stages saw Rahim rekindle his touch, anchoring the innings to a modest total. Yet, with only 249 runs on the board, Bangladesh found themselves 30-40 runs short on a track that demanded a stronger finish. 

England’s Clinical Chase

England’s response was a masterclass in composure and precision. Unlike Bangladesh, they prioritized strike rotation over flamboyance, ensuring the pressure of the required run rate never mounted. Ben Duckett emerged as the architect of the chase, showcasing technical prowess and an authoritative sweep shot that neutralized the Bangladeshi spinners. His ability to accumulate runs with deft placements was a testament to his maturity as a batsman. 

The hallmark of England’s approach lay in their temperament. Partnerships flourished even after dismissals, as incoming batsmen seamlessly adapted to the situation. The middle overs, often the Achilles’ heel for chasing sides, became a stage for England to solidify their grip on the game. They refrained from rash risks, opting instead for calculated aggression, a strategy that paid dividends as they eased to victory. 

Bangladesh’s Shortcomings: Lessons to Be Learned

Bangladesh’s performance, though spirited, revealed familiar flaws. Their spinners faltered by relying on turn rather than bowling a disciplined line and length. The inability to contain England’s singles and twos compounded their woes, with fielding lapses punctuating a lacklustre display. While Mashrafe Bin Mortaza’s late resurgence hinted at resilience, it was not enough to unsettle England’s determination. 

A Contest of Contrasts

The third ODI was a microcosm of contrasting philosophies. While England exuded professionalism and clarity of purpose, Bangladesh seemed to waver under pressure, undermining their potential. Buttler’s captaincy, bolstered by a collective effort from bowlers and batsmen, stood out as a template for modern limited-overs cricket. 

For Bangladesh, the match served as a reminder of the importance of adaptability and discipline, qualities they must hone to compete against the best. As the series concluded, it left fans with both moments of brilliance and lessons for the future—a testament to the enduring allure of cricket. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Brazil Triumphs in the Rain: A Pragmatic Victory in Merida

On a dark, rainy night in Merida, Brazil continued their resurgence under Tite’s stewardship, registering a composed 2-0 victory over Venezuela. The match, while lacking the tempo and flair often associated with the Selecao, showcased their ability to adapt and seize opportunities even in trying conditions. 

The rain-soaked pitch, coupled with power cuts during crucial phases of play, disrupted the rhythm and spectacle of the encounter. Yet, Brazil’s discipline and tactical coherence shone through, marking another step forward in their quest to reclaim their dominance in world football. 

Capitalizing on Mistakes

This wasn’t a game defined by Brazil’s individual brilliance alone but also by their opportunistic exploitation of Venezuelan errors. The hosts, struggling to build cohesive attacks, inadvertently invited pressure through lapses in concentration. Brazil, under Tite, have mastered the art of turning such mistakes into launching pads for incisive counters. 

Gabriel Jesus, the 19-year-old sensation, continued his meteoric rise on the international stage, scoring his fourth goal in as many matches. Each touch of his seemed measured, a perfect blend of grace and purpose that reflected his growing confidence in the Selecao jersey. 

While Neymar’s absence might have been a concern, the collective effort of players like Philippe Coutinho and Willian ensured Brazil’s attacking edge was not blunted. Coutinho, in particular, orchestrated movements with finesse, constantly probing the Venezuelan defence and stretching them with his incisive runs. 

Midfield and Defensive Solidity

Renato Augusto deserves credit for his commanding presence in midfield. His ability to dictate the pace of the game—slowing it down when necessary and quickening transitions when opportunities arose—was instrumental. His composure acted as the fulcrum for Brazil’s possession-based play, providing a steady link between the defense and attack. 

The backline, too, was a picture of composure. Compact and synchronized, they nullified Venezuela’s sporadic forays forward, giving goalkeeper Alisson a relatively quiet night. This defensive organization, a hallmark of Tite’s regime, reflects the balance Brazil has sought to restore—combining attacking verve with defensive discipline. 

A Second Half of Missed Chances

The second half promised more goals, and Brazil came tantalizingly close to delivering. A disallowed goal for offside and several missed opportunities left fans yearning for the clinical edge that could have turned a good performance into a commanding one. 

Despite the missed chances, the Selecao’s ability to regroup quickly after losing possession was notable. The team’s high press and immediate transition into attack illustrated their evolving tactical maturity. Tite’s emphasis on collective responsibility was evident, as every player contributed to both the offensive and defensive phases of the game. 

A Pragmatic Display Amid Adversity

This was not the free-flowing, samba-style football that has defined Brazil’s legacy. Instead, it was a pragmatic display shaped by the circumstances—a rain-drenched pitch, intermittent power outages, and a dogged opposition. 

What stood out was Brazil’s ability to adapt and find moments of quality amid the challenges. Gabriel Jesus’s precision, Coutinho’s creativity, and Augusto’s control exemplified a team in sync with their manager’s vision. 

Progress Under Tite

With this victory, Brazil continued to consolidate their position as a force to be reckoned with under Tite’s leadership. While the match lacked the flamboyance often expected from the Selecao, it demonstrated their resilience and growing tactical discipline. 

As the rain poured over Merida, Brazil proved that they could win not just with flair but with grit and intelligence—a hallmark of champions in the making.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar