Wednesday, July 18, 2018

FIFA World Cup 2018: The French Triumph in Russia

France’s 4-2 victory over Croatia in the 2018 World Cup final was a fitting conclusion to a tournament characterized by pragmatism, tactical discipline, and moments of brilliance. The final itself, though high-scoring, was not a showcase of expansive, free-flowing football but rather a battle of structure and execution. Goals stemmed largely from set-pieces rather than open play, reflecting a broader trend throughout the tournament.

While Croatia enjoyed first-half dominance due to their intelligent pressing and midfield control, France’s efficiency in transitions and set-piece prowess ultimately secured their victory. Luka Modric, the tournament’s Golden Ball winner, orchestrated Croatia’s attacks with supreme positional awareness, frequently finding pockets of space beyond Paul Pogba’s reach. Yet, for all their ball dominance, Croatia struggled to carve out clear-cut opportunities, a testament to France’s defensive organization.

The Tactical Chess Match: Croatia’s Pressing vs. France’s Efficiency

One of the defining features of Croatia’s approach was their pressing intensity—an anomaly in a World Cup largely devoid of aggressive high pressing. Unlike club teams with ample training time, international sides often rely on compact defensive structures rather than coordinated pressing. However, Croatia disrupted this norm. Modric and Ivan Rakitic pushed high to support Mario Mandzukic, while wide players Ante Rebic and Ivan Perisic pressed tirelessly. This strategy unsettled France early on, forcing errors from Benjamin Pavard, Raphael Varane, and N’Golo Kante, who uncharacteristically struggled under pressure.

In contrast, France’s attacking approach was built around moments rather than sustained control. Kylian Mbappe’s blistering pace was their primary weapon, particularly in transitions. Though France lacked fluid open-play sequences, their ability to capitalize on set-pieces and counterattacks proved decisive. Pogba’s precise passing released Mbappe multiple times, culminating in France’s third goal, where Pogba’s drive and vision unlocked Croatia’s defence.

The Importance of Balance and Squad Harmony

Beyond tactics, France’s success under Didier Deschamps was rooted in squad unity and disciplined pragmatism. Deschamps, who became only the third person to win the World Cup as both player and manager, prioritized harmony over individual brilliance. This philosophy had been in place since his appointment in 2012, a direct response to the chaos of France’s 2010 World Cup campaign in South Africa—a tournament marked by internal conflicts, player mutinies, and off-field scandals.

France’s disastrous 2010 campaign, led by Raymond Domenech, exposed deep fractures within the squad. The French Football Federation’s subsequent decision to overhaul team culture began with Laurent Blanc, who controversially omitted the entire 2010 squad for his first match in charge. While Blanc restored some stability, his tenure was marred by racial controversy regarding youth academy selections, reflecting broader societal tensions in France.

Deschamps inherited this fractured landscape and took decisive steps to foster unity. His most notable decision was the continued exile of Karim Benzema, despite his undeniable talent. Similarly, his squad selections prioritized cohesion over individual skill, leading to the omissions of high-profile players like Alexandre Lacazette, Anthony Martial, and Adrien Rabiot. The latter’s reaction—refusing to be on the standby list—only vindicated Deschamps’ decision.

The Evolution of Key Players: Pogba and Griezmann’s Tactical Sacrifice

Deschamps’ ability to mould a collection of stars into a cohesive unit was exemplified by the roles assigned to Paul Pogba and Antoine Griezmann. Pogba, often criticized at Manchester United for inconsistency, embraced a more disciplined role, sacrificing personal flair for team structure. His performances in the knockout stages, particularly in the final, demonstrated his evolution into a complete midfield general.

Griezmann, too, adapted his role for the greater good. Rather than operating purely as a goal scorer, he functioned as a deeper playmaker, facilitating transitions and linking play. His selflessness allowed Mbappe to thrive in a more advanced role, showcasing the young star’s electrifying speed and composure.

A Reflection of France’s Diversity and Identity

Much like the 1998 World Cup-winning squad, France’s 2018 team was emblematic of the nation’s multicultural identity. Seventeen of the 23 squad members were eligible to represent other nations, reinforcing the country’s footballing diversity. This echoed the ethos of “Black-Blanc-Beur” (Black-White-Arab) that defined the 1998 team’s success.

In a politically charged climate, where debates over national identity and immigration were prominent, this team symbolized unity and inclusion. Blaise Matuidi articulated this sentiment: “The diversity we have in this team is in the image of our beautiful country. We proudly represent France.”

Deschamps’ Legacy: Pragmatism Over Panache

Criticism of France’s playing style—deemed too pragmatic given their attacking talent—is not unique. Similar complaints were leveled at Italy in 2006, Spain in 2010, and Germany in 2014. Deschamps prioritized structure and balance, a formula that ultimately delivered the sport’s most prestigious prize. His philosophy aligns with France’s national motto: “Liberté, égalité, fraternité.”

Ultimately, the 2018 World Cup victory was a triumph of tactical discipline, squad unity, and moments of individual brilliance. France’s blend of pragmatism and dynamism, guided by Deschamps’ leadership, ensured they returned to the pinnacle of world football. As Benjamin Mendy put it: “We are a true family. There was an incredible feeling from the off. Thanks to everyone. Allez les Bleus!”

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

WG Grace

WG Grace stands not merely as a legend but as a towering figure whose shadow stretches across the annals of cricketing history. Even among the pantheon of the sport’s immortals, Grace occupies a rarefied space—a colossus among giants, whose presence transcended the boundaries of the 22-yard pitch and etched itself indelibly into the cultural fabric of Victorian England.

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Grace was a figure of such renown that only Queen Victoria, adorned in her royal regalia, or perhaps the statesman William Gladstone, rivalled his recognizability. Yet, for the cricket-loving populace, Grace reigned supreme. He was not merely a cricketer; he was a symbol, an institution, and an embodiment of the sport itself. Trains paused for his farewells, porters abandoned their duties for a handshake, and throngs gathered for a fleeting glimpse of the man whose stature, both literal and metaphorical, seemed almost mythic.

Grace’s beard, a luxuriant and unmistakable cascade, became a metaphor for his dominance—a singular feature in an era when facial hair was a badge of masculinity. Even amidst the verdant thickets of Victorian beards, Grace’s stood apart, much like his unparalleled achievements with the bat. The anecdote of Ernie Jones bowling through that bushy marvel, only to apologize with characteristic humour, epitomizes the blend of reverence and levity that Grace inspired.

The aura surrounding Grace often threatens to overshadow the man himself and his extraordinary cricketing feats. His presence on the field was so magnetic that ticket prices doubled when he played—a testament to his singular ability to captivate audiences. As GK Chesterton aptly remarked, Grace was a “prodigious Puck,” a sprite of English cricket whose exploits transformed the sport from a rudimentary pastime into a symphonic art form. He took the one-stringed lute of early cricket and fashioned it into a many-chorded lyre, enriching the game with his innovation and mastery.

The Grace legacy was deeply rooted in Gloucestershire, a county forever associated with his name. It was here, at Downend, that Dr. Henry Mills Grace, WG’s father, established a home and a cricketing dynasty. Martha Grace, WG’s formidable mother, was no passive observer. A towering figure in her own right, she oversaw the cricketing education of her sons with a discerning eye and an unwavering commitment. Her scrapbooks chronicling their careers were no mere mementoes; they were comprehensive records rivalling Wisden in their detail and precision. Her death, marked by the poignant interruption of a match at Old Trafford, underscored her irreplaceable role in the family’s cricketing ascendancy.

WG’s early years were shaped by a rigorous regimen at The Chestnuts, the family home, where cricket was both a pastime and a profession. Under the tutelage of Uncle Alfred Pocock, young WG honed his skills alongside his brothers. The Grace sisters and even the family dogs—Don, Ponto, and Noble—played their part, with Ponto’s fielding skills earning a place in cricketing lore. Such was the cradle of cricketing excellence that nurtured the prodigious talents of WG and his siblings, including the tragically short-lived Fred Grace, whose brilliance was extinguished too soon.

The Graceful Grace: Unfolding of A Legend

The mythology of WG Grace often obscures the reality of his achievements, but a closer examination reveals a cricketer of unparalleled skill and vision. He was not merely a product of his time but a revolutionary who reshaped the game’s contours. To understand Grace is to grasp not just the man but the epoch he defined—a golden age of cricket illuminated by his genius and sustained by his legacy.

The story of WG Grace begins in a cricketing milieu already rich with tradition, where the All England Elevens occasionally graced Downend, pitting their illustrious skills against local teams of twenty-two. The likes of George Parr, William Caffyn, and Julius Caesar brought the grandeur of the wider cricketing world to the small town. Even Alfred Mynn, the genial titan whose exploits had once dominated the cricketing landscape, stood as an umpire during one such encounter. These visits, steeped in cricketing lore, left an indelible mark on the young Graces, particularly EM and WG.

It was during one of these matches that William Clarke, impressed by young EM’s deft work as a long-stop, gifted him a bat with a spliced handle reinforced by whalebone—a symbolic passing of the torch to the next generation. For WG, the journey to greatness began with rigorous training, and hours spent at the wicket honing the straight bat, a skill he mastered before reaching double digits in age. Under the watchful eye of Uncle Alfred Pocock, WG internalized the mantra: “Do not allow the bowler to stick you up, or it is all over with you.”Decades later, Grace would reinterpret this wisdom with characteristic flair, proclaiming, “Get at the beggar before he gets at you.”

WG’s formative years were not without tribulation. At 15, he suffered a life-threatening bout of pneumonia, a moment that could have altered the trajectory of cricket history. His recovery marked the beginning of a transformation—he grew into a towering figure, surpassing six feet, with a physique that set him apart from his brothers, who were shorter and stockier. WG’s burgeoning athleticism extended beyond cricket; he excelled in 440-yard hurdles, clocking an impressive 70 seconds at Crystal Palace—a testament to his versatility and physical prowess.

By the time WG entered First-Class cricket, EM had already established himself as a formidable batsman, crafty lob bowler, and the finest point fielder of his era. Yet, WG’s arrival heralded a seismic shift in the game. Tales of his exploits spread rapidly, and his name became synonymous with dominance.

Bridging the Chasm: WG Grace and the Redefinition of Cricket

WG Grace’s career, spanning four decades, is a chronicle of sustained brilliance punctuated by brief dips and culminating in a remarkable resurgence in his late forties. His impact was immediate and transformative, particularly in the storied Gentlemen vs. Players matches. Before WG’s arrival, the Gentlemen had managed only seven victories in 27 years, often outclassed by the Professionals’ superior bowling, especially their fast bowlers like George “Tear ‘em” Tarrant and James Jackson. The amateurs, with their genteel batting, often crumbled on difficult wickets.

WG changed this dynamic entirely. A player of rare versatility, he thrived against the fiercest pace, combining staunch defence with audacious stroke play. Over the next 18 years, the Players managed only seven wins, a reversal that underscored WG’s influence. His batting prowess tilted the scales, and his cunning bowling further decimated the Professionals. WG was, in essence, a professional in spirit, cloaked in the guise of an amateur—a reality that both enhanced his legend and provoked controversy.

The Chasm of Excellence: WG and His Contemporaries

From 1868 to 1877, WG’s dominance was unprecedented. He not only topped the batting averages year after year but often doubled the output of the next-best batsman. In an era where cricket was still evolving, WG’s all-around mastery created an enormous gulf between himself and his peers. Even in 1875, a year he deemed “mediocre,” he finished second in averages while leading in aggregate runs—a performance that would have been a career highlight for most others.

This statistical supremacy reflected not just skill but a profound understanding of the game. WG’s ability to adapt—whether playing on sticky wickets or against fiery bowlers—set him apart. He brought a professional rigour to cricket that belied the amateur ethos of the time, elevating the sport from a pastime to a spectacle of skill and strategy.

Legacy Beyond Numbers

WG Grace was more than a cricketer; he was a cultural phenomenon. His towering frame, flowing beard, and unparalleled achievements made him a figure of almost mythical proportions. Yet, behind the legend lay a man whose work ethic, innovation, and competitive spirit reshaped cricket. WG did not merely dominate his era; he defined it, setting standards that would influence generations to come.

To analyze WG’s career is to understand the transformative power of genius in sports. He bridged divides—between Gentlemen and Players, between tradition and modernity—and left a legacy that continues to resonate. WG Grace was not just the best of his time; he was a harbinger of what cricket could become.

WG Grace: The Colossus of Cricket’s Golden Age 

The dry, sunlit summer of 1871 marked the beginning of WG Grace’s unparalleled dominance in cricket, a period widely regarded as the zenith of his career. That season, he amassed 2,739 runs at an astounding average of 78.25, a figure that dwarfed the second-best, Richard Daft, who managed 37.66. Grace’s 10 centuries that year stood in stark contrast to the mere two scored by any other batsman. His consistency was such that a rare failure in one innings was often promptly rectified by a commanding hundred in the next. His contributions were often so significant that they seemed to constitute the entirety of his team’s efforts, underscoring his singular brilliance. 

By 1876, the peak of his career, Grace’s dominance had reached mythical proportions. Contemporary observers remarked, “Modern cricket seems to have resolved itself into a match between Mr Grace on one side and the bowling strength of England on the other.”* During one extraordinary week in August, he produced a series of performances that seemed almost supernatural: 344 for MCC at Canterbury, followed by 177 at Clifton, and culminating in an unbeaten 318 at Cheltenham for Gloucestershire. These feats, performed with a majestic beard that had become his signature, cemented his status as a living legend. 

Master of Both Bat and Ball 

Grace’s all-around prowess was unparalleled. Over his career, he scored 1,000 or more runs in 28 seasons and exceeded 2,000 on five occasions. While his batting achievements are rightly celebrated, his bowling was equally formidable. In 1867, he topped the bowling averages, and during his peak years—1874, 1875, and 1877—he took the most wickets in addition to dominating with the bat. Over nine seasons, he claimed more than 100 wickets, a testament to his versatility and endurance. 

At his best, Grace was not only the finest batsman the game had seen but also one of its most effective bowlers. Few could rival his all-around contributions, and none could match his ability to single-handedly dictate the outcome of matches. 

The Challenge of Fred Spofforth 

By 1878, Grace had married, become a father, and completed his medical degree, following in the footsteps of his father and brothers. His cricketing commitments waned temporarily, but the arrival of Fred Spofforth, the Australian “Demon Bowler,” rekindled his competitive fire. Spofforth, unawed by Grace’s towering reputation, dismissed him twice at Lord’s in 1878, leading to a rare defeat for MCC. English bowlers often joked that Grace should use a smaller bat to level the playing field, but Spofforth thrived on the challenge of bowling to the great man. This rivalry spurred Grace to new heights, including a magnificent 152 on his Test debut in 1880, the first Test ever played in England. 

The Summer in the Subcontinent of a Cricketing Titan 

By the 1890s, Grace’s expanding girth and fondness for food and whiskey began to tell on his physique, yet his appetite for runs remained insatiable. The year 1895, when he was 47, marked the Indian summer of his career. He scored 2,346 runs at an average of 51.00, including nine centuries. The following year, he added another 2,135 runs at 42.00. These achievements, at an age when most cricketers had long retired, reinforced his reputation as a timeless phenomenon. 

Even as his dominance waned with the emergence of new talents like Arthur Shrewsbury, Grace remained the cornerstone of English cricket. Until 1899, it was unthinkable to form an England XI without him. His final Test innings, shared with the youthful CB Fry, was marked by a wry acknowledgement of his advancing years: *“Remember, I am not a sprinter like you.”* Yet, Grace continued to play domestic cricket, scoring his last First-Class century the day after his 56th birthday. 

The Indomitable Spirit 

In 1888, Archibald Stuart Wortley captured Grace in a portrait that remains displayed in the Long Room at Lord’s. The painting depicts him with bronzed cheeks, a bushy beard, and a stance both balanced and poised for attack. When asked if he would appear as composed in a tight situation, Grace replied with characteristic confidence:“Certainly, because after all I should only be facing the next ball.”

This philosophy epitomized Grace’s approach to the game. Over his career, he scored 54,211 First-Class runs at an average of 39.25, including 124 centuries. These numbers, remarkable in any era, are even more extraordinary when contextualized within the challenges of 19th-century cricket: treacherous pitches, rudimentary equipment, and the necessity to run every single run, even for boundaries. 

Grace’s batting was not marked by the elegance of Victor Trumper or the finesse of KS Ranjitsinhji. He lacked the clinical precision of Jack Hobbs or the explosive power of Gilbert Jessop. Yet, his influence on the game was unparalleled. As Ranjitsinhji observed, *“He turned batting’s many straight channels into one great winding river.”

Grace was a pioneer who redefined cricket, elevating it from a pastime to a profession. His monumental presence at the crease, his strategic acumen, and his indefatigable energy made him the first true superstar of the sport. While others have surpassed his records, few have matched his impact. WG Grace remains not just a figure in cricket history but a symbol of its enduring spirit. 

The Synthesis of Styles and Master of All 

WG Grace was not merely a cricketer; he was a phenomenon, a synthesis of every batting style known to his era, and the progenitor of several yet to come. His batting repertoire encompassed the full spectrum of strokes—forward and back, off-side and leg-side, horizontal bat and vertical blade. His ability to hit all around the wicket, often for hours on end without a hint of fatigue, was unmatched. Among his innovations was a hard, straight-batted push to leg, a stroke uniquely his own. Grace himself summed up his philosophy succinctly: *“I don’t like defensive strokes; you can only get three off them.”

Though regarded as a relentless accumulator rather than a flamboyant hitter, his approach was anything but passive. Leaving balls alone—a virtue in the modern game—was anathema to his mindset. Parson Wickham, who once kept wicket during a monumental Grace innings, recalled that WG let only four balls pass untouched throughout the marathon effort, each strike connecting cleanly with the middle of the bat. When the Australians in 1884 accused the English of using bats wider than the rules permitted, Grace’s response was characteristically dismissive: “I don’t care how much they shave off my bat, as long as they leave the middle.”

The Nightmare of Fielding Captains 

Setting a field for WG was an exercise in futility. Accustomed to playing against odds—teams with 18 or even 22 fielders—he found gaps with almost supernatural ease when facing the standard eleven. Captains shuffled their fielders incessantly, only to watch the ball race through the very spot just vacated. Professional bowlers often celebrated his dismissal with unrestrained joy. Tom Emmett, after missing a caught-and-bowled chance, famously flung his cap to the ground in frustration and kicked the ball to the boundary. Grace, ever the wit, encouraged him: *“Kick it again, Tom; it’s always four to me.”* 

His technique was a study in adaptability. With weight distributed primarily on his right foot, he could effortlessly move back and cut deliveries others would tackle on the front foot. Fast and medium pacers, whom he respected yet relished, bore the brunt of his attacking instincts. Fred Morley, one of the fastest bowlers of his time, once saw two of his fiery deliveries hooked for sixes over WG’s eyebrows. On venomous wickets, Grace was at his indomitable best, earning applause at Lord’s for halting four consecutive shooters with ease.

Grace’s resilience extended beyond his physical prowess. On one occasion, after being struck painfully by a slinging delivery from Jack Crossland, he limped to the boundary, calmed the enraged spectators, and then returned to the crease to dismantle Crossland’s attack with a ruthless hundred. His ability to counter adversity, whether from the bowler’s hand or the pitch’s treachery, exemplified his mental fortitude. 

Critics have speculated whether Grace’s dominance would have persisted in the modern era of restrictive field placements and tactical bowling. Yet, it is hard to imagine his genius constrained by any era. A brief frown and a thoughtful tug at his beard might have preceded his adjustments, but the gaps would surely have revealed themselves, and the runs would have flowed, as they always did. Genius, after all, transcends time. 

The Deceptive Art of His Bowling 

While Grace is celebrated primarily as a batsman, his bowling was no mere accessory. In his youth, he bowled a round-arm medium pace that evolved into a slower, craftier style as he aged. His approach was disarmingly straightforward, yet his deliveries were imbued with guile that confounded even the best batsmen. Bob Thomas, a veteran umpire, once remarked that if Grace had not been the greatest batsman, he might well have been the greatest bowler—a claim perhaps exaggerated but not without merit. 

Grace’s bowling statistics speak volumes: 2,809 First-Class wickets at an average of 18.14, including 240 five-wicket hauls and 64 ten-wicket matches. Such figures demand more than luck; they reflect a deep understanding of batsmen’s weaknesses and an ability to exploit them. His bowling style, characterized by a looping trajectory and deceptive flight, lured many into ill-advised strokes. Even when his bulk swayed the ball into an unintentional googly, the results were often devastating. 

In 1877, against Nottinghamshire, he captured 17 wickets in a single match, including seven dismissals in 17 balls without conceding a run. These were not the fortuitous spoils of erratic bowling but the calculated victories of a bowler who understood the psychology of his opponents. 

The Mentor and Sportsman 

Grace’s competitive spirit was tempered by a magnanimous heart. When a young batsman faced him, Grace would often murmur, “I’ll get you out, boy.” And when he inevitably did, he was just as likely to invite the crestfallen youth to the nets the next morning for a lesson on how to play the very ball that had dismissed him. This duality—ruthless on the field yet generous off it—cemented his status not just as a cricketer but as a mentor and ambassador of the game. 

Sometimes his medical methods were rather unusual. When a drunken sweep stinking of beer demanded a tonic, WG responded, “What you need lad is exercise and not medicine.” Following this, he called out to his maid, “Mary, fetch my boxing gloves.” The patient rushed out, completely cured, screaming, “The great big b***** wants to fight me!”

FS Ashley Cooper said of his friend, “For years after he left Bristol, poor people would relate how, after a tiring day in the field, he would visit them, not in a professional capacity, but as a friend, doing much to alleviate pain and spread cheerfulness.”

WG’s treatment was often carried out on the cricket field. Joe Hadow made a running catch at deep square leg to dismiss WG and stumbled forward to hit his head against the projecting metal edge of a stand. WG, on his way back to the pavilion, administered first aid with gentle firmness reserved for someone who had made a catch of a genuine six-hit.

More significantly, WG saved the life of old Gloucestershire cricketer and cricket writer ACM Croome in 1887. Croome gashed his throat against one of the spiked railings in front of the pavilion of Old Trafford and the cut was deep and potentially fatal. WG held the jagged edges of the wound together for nearly half an hour as messengers scurried to find surgical needles. WG had been bowling all day but for his stamina and nerve, it would have been near impossible to keep holding the position without twitching his finger or thumb.

There were occasions when he remained up all night with a difficult case and returned to the ground the next morning to hit a hundred or pick up a bushel of wickets. And as in his own chamber, sometimes the methods of medical practice on the field were slightly unorthodox. Kent amateur CJM Fox stooped sharply to field a hard hit, overbalanced, and put his shoulder out in the fall. EM ran to him, signalling to the pavilion. WG bustled out and for the next few minutes, the crowd were treated to a peculiar scene. EM sat on the unfortunate lad’s head as WG grabbed his arm and began to pull, with his foot as a fulcrum.  After a terrible and painful pause, a loud crack was heard and the shoulder went back into place. “You’re a very lucky young man,” WG exclaimed while leaving the field.

The Complete Cricketer and Compassionate Healer 

WG Grace was a man of many facets, each more fascinating than the last. As a young man, he was an exceptional outfielder, his athleticism rivalling the best of his time. While he excelled as a cover-point early in his career, he later gravitated toward the point position, not just for its strategic advantages but also for the psychological edge it afforded. Grace relished the opportunity to chatter incessantly to the batsman, employing a mix of wit, guile, and gamesmanship to unsettle his opponent. 

His throwing arm was a marvel of precision and power, particularly in his youth. His throws from the deep were swift and accurate, often delivered on the run with a bowler-like action. During the Australian Aboriginal cricket team’s tour in 1868, Grace triumphed in a throwing competition, hurling the ball distances of 116, 117, and 118 yards at The Oval. At Eastbourne, he achieved an astonishing 122 yards, a testament to his raw athleticism. 

While his agility waned with age, his hands remained as sharp as ever. A contemporary journalist, chronicling his American tour, noted that the ball seemed “fascinated by Mr. Grace’s basilisk eye, for it seems to jump into his hand.” Even as his frame grew bulkier, his fielding instincts and reflexes did not diminish. 

Master of All Trades in the Field 

Grace’s versatility in the field was extraordinary. Although he preferred point to slip—a position he disliked—he occasionally donned the wicketkeeping gloves when necessity demanded. While his brother EM was often considered the better fielder in the family, WG was not far behind. He was particularly brilliant when fielding off his own bowling, charging to positions like silly mid-off to pull off catches of remarkable brilliance. 

One story encapsulates his fielding prowess and indomitable spirit. Bowling a flighted delivery on the leg stump, he lured the batsman into a towering shot toward square leg. Grace, with the urgency of a raging bison, sprinted diagonally across the field, warning the stationed fielder to stand clear, and completed a stunning catch at full gallop. The batsman, departing in disbelief, was heard muttering, “That chap won’t be satisfied till he’s keeping wickets to his bowling.” 

WG’s tally of 876 catches in First-Class cricket is second only to Frank Woolley’s, a testament to his enduring skill and opportunism. His craft extended beyond athleticism to an almost Machiavellian cunning. The infamous run-out of Sammy Jones in the 1882 Test—while Jones was distractedly gardening—illustrates his sharp mind and willingness to exploit any lapse in concentration. Grace defended his actions as a lesson to the younger player, though Fred Spofforth’s subsequent bowling rampage and the birth of the Ashes added a touch of irony to the episode. 

Revered by Peers and Rivals 

Grace’s greatness was universally acknowledged, even by his fiercest competitors. When a comparison was drawn between him and Billy Murdoch, Alec Bannerman dismissed the notion with disdain: “Murdoch? Why, WG has forgotten more than Billy ever learnt.” Murdoch himself offered an earthy yet profound tribute: “WG should never be put underground. When he dies, his body ought to be embalmed and permanently exhibited in the British Museum as ‘the colossal cricketer of all time.’”

The Doctor with a Big Heart 

Beyond the cricket field, WG Grace was a physician who embodied compassion and community spirit. Though he did not pursue his medical diploma with the same fervour as his centuries, he fulfilled his duties with dedication and empathy. As a parish doctor in Bristol, serving a largely working-class community, Grace often treated patients without demanding payment. His rounds through the streets, clad in a rough tweed suit, were marked by acts of kindness—whether pausing to chat with children, providing coal to a family in need, or browbeating friends into offering employment to the jobless. 

Grace’s generosity extended beyond medicine. If a patient’s home smelled of brewing soup, he would sometimes stay for dinner, blending seamlessly into the family’s routine. In winter, he became a favourite target for children’s snowballs. Yet, even in play, Grace’s competitive spirit shone through; his pickups were swift, his throws accurate, and his retaliation ensured the young pranksters received a taste of their own medicine. 

The Colossal Cricketer 

Grace’s life was a seamless blend of cricketing genius and human compassion. CB Fry once quipped that WG was the only man to receive a medical degree for his operations on the cricket field—a jest that underscored his dominance in both realms. Whether mesmerizing batsmen with his bowling, orchestrating catches with surgical precision, or tending to the sick with selfless dedication, Grace was a man whose impact transcended the boundaries of sport. 

His legacy endures not merely in the records he set or the matches he won but in the ethos, he embodied: a relentless pursuit of excellence, a love for the game, and a profound humanity that endeared him to all who crossed his path. To call him the “colossal cricketer” is to capture only a fraction of his greatness. WG Grace was, and remains, a towering figure in the annals of cricket and life. 

The Legend, the Lore, and the Laughter 

WG Grace, the towering figure of cricket’s golden age, is as much a product of historical fact as of the vibrant folklore that surrounds him. Stories about him blur the line between reality and myth, creating a rich tapestry of anecdotes that are as entertaining as they are revealing of the man behind the legend. 

Did Grace really tell an umpire that the crowd had come to watch him bat, not to see umpiring decisions? Did he replace the dislodged bails and continue batting, dismissing the moment as if it had never happened? Did he attribute fallen bails to a “strong westerly” wind? And did he nonchalantly grunt “The Lady” when the opposition captain spun the coin, choosing to bat regardless of whether Queen Victoria or Britannia graced the toss? 

The truth of these tales is elusive. Too much time has passed, and the factual fragments are inseparably intertwined with the apocryphal enormity of Grace’s mythos. Yet, these stories endure, told and retold with the knowing caveat: “Just the sort of thing the Old Man would have done.” 

The Wit and Wisdom of the Great Cricketer 

Grace’s contemporaries were quick to recognize—and immortalize—his dominance on the field. Yorkshireman Tom Emmett, weary of Grace’s relentless scoring, quipped, “It’s Grace before meat, Grace after meat, Grace all day, and I reckon it’ll be Grace tomorrow.”

Nottinghamshire’s James Shaw echoed the sentiment: “I puts them where I likes, but that beggar, he puts them where he likes.”

Grace himself was not one for intellectual pretensions or veiled humour. His wit, when it surfaced, was simple and direct. When a young batsman boasted he had never been dismissed for a duck, Grace dryly assigned him the No. 11 spot, remarking, “No blob, eh? Then No. 11 for you. Not enough experience.”

This simplicity extended to his cricketing philosophy. Asked how to deal with a difficult ball, his advice was straightforward and timeless: “I should lay the bat against the ball.”

In this unadorned wisdom lies a metaphor for life itself. 

Master of the Rules—and Their Limits 

Grace was as much a master of cricket’s rules as he was of stretching them to their limits. He famously “educated” umpires, often with a wink, ensuring that their interpretations aligned with his own. A typical lesson might involve him admonishing an official: “If he catches me after the ball has gone out of the ground, it’s six to me.”

Francis Thompson aptly described Grace as,“The long-whiskered Doctor that laugheth the rules to scorn.”

Yet, Grace’s bending of the rules was often more playful than pernicious. His brother EM, in contrast, was known for more dubious tactics, such as appealing for obstruction when struck by a batsman’s follow-through. WG, with his disdain for such trickery, reportedly advised, “Obstruction be blown. Catch the ball and never mind bamboozling the umpire.”

Fact, Fiction, and the Power of Story 

Among the many tales of Grace, one stands out for its theatricality. After being clean bowled by Charles Kortright, the fast bowler allegedly remarked, *“Surely you’re not going, Doctor. There’s one stump still standing.”* Whether this exchange occurred or was a creation of Kortright’s imagination, it remains an enduring part of Grace’s lore. 

Grace himself was not immune to barbs. Once, when he intervened in a street cricket game to rule a boy leg-before, the lad retorted, *“Garn! What’s an old buffer like you know about cricket?”* Another time, a servant girl visiting Madame Tussaud’s told him she hadn’t seen his wax figure because it was in the Chamber of Horrors, which required an extra fee. 

The Man Behind the Myth 

Grace’s artfulness on the cricket field was matched by his shrewdness off it. Often accused of “shamateurism,” he navigated the blurred lines between amateurism and professionalism with a countryman’s pragmatism. His infamous attempt to poach Billy Midwinter from the Australian team to play for Gloucestershire may not have been entirely ethical, but it lacked malice. 

At his core, Grace was a man of simplicity and humour, as exemplified by his handling of a tramp caught raiding his larder. After dressing the man’s wounds—“Medical etiquette,” he explained—Grace delivered a running kick and let him go, an act that was equal parts justice and jest. 

The End of an Era 

In his later years, Grace remained a beloved figure, his presence at public events or even a fleeting glimpse of him in a car enough to bring life to a standstill. His simplicity and humanity endeared him to all, even as the world around him grew increasingly complex. 

The outbreak of World War I deeply saddened Grace, a man who struggled to reconcile the senselessness of the conflict with his own straightforward worldview. Cricket historian Derek Birley captured the poignancy of his passing in October 1915, writing: “The bleakness of the war was exemplified by the death of Grace, which seemed depressingly emblematic of the end of an era.”

A Legacy Beyond Compare 

WG Grace’s life and career defy easy categorization. He was a cricketer, a doctor, a humorist, and a legend whose stories continue to captivate. Whether fact or fiction, the tales of his exploits reveal a man whose influence transcended the sport he so thoroughly dominated. Grace remains not just a figure in cricket’s history but a symbol of its enduring spirit—a blend of skill, wit, and humanity that continues to inspire. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Sunday, July 15, 2018

Shakib Al Hasan’s Brilliance Overshadowed by Bangladesh’s Batting Collapse



 The ninth over of Day 2 saw a moment of brilliance that encapsulated Shakib Al Hasan’s enduring genius. Bowling from wide of the crease, he delivered a flighted, well-paced delivery that broke through Kraigg Brathwaite’s stubborn defence. It was vintage Shakib—a dismissal that reminded critics why he remains Bangladesh’s finest cricketer. 

The following day, Shakib carried that momentum into a spell of ruthless precision, dismantling the West Indies’ middle order with clinical efficiency. His mastery of length—flighting the ball just enough to entice and deceive—proved too much for the hosts. 

Devon Smith was lured forward by a teasing delivery, only to be stumped, while Keemo Paul fell prey to a similar trap. Kieran Powell, fighting to stem the collapse, was undone by Shakib’s trademark quicker one, trapped plumb in front. 

The skipper’s six-wicket haul was a masterclass in Test match bowling, supported ably by Abu Jayed, Taijul Islam, and Mehidy Hasan Miraz. Together, they skittled the West Indies for 129 in their second innings, leaving Bangladesh with a chaseable target of 335 on a pitch that, while challenging, was far from unplayable. 

Yet, what followed was a disheartening display of ineptitude and lack of application from Bangladesh’s batters, culminating in a humiliating defeat within three days. 

A Familiar Story: Batting Failures and Poor Temperament

Bangladesh’s response to the target was a stark reminder of their long-standing batting frailties. While Shakib fought valiantly, crafting a half-century, his efforts were solitary. The rest of the lineup folded meekly, displaying neither the intent nor the resilience required in Test cricket. 

Tamim Iqbal’s post-match reflection was telling:  “We only have ourselves to blame. Our batting was not up to the mark. These were difficult wickets but not unplayable. Exceptional deliveries got us out, but not enough to justify failing to cross 200 in any innings.”

The numbers were damning. Bangladesh’s collective batting average for the series was a paltry 12.60—their lowest ever. Not a single batsman managed a century across four innings. The top order showed glimpses of promise but lacked the temperament to convert starts into meaningful contributions. 

Selection Missteps and Positional Confusion

The team’s struggles were compounded by puzzling selection decisions. The choice to open with Liton Das was baffling. A natural middle-order batsman and wicketkeeper, Liton was thrust into an unfamiliar role, exposing his vulnerabilities against the new ball. 

Imrul Kayes’s absence due to injury was unfortunate, but Bangladesh’s failure to field a proper replacement highlighted a lack of depth and planning. Liton, ideally suited for the lower middle order, was miscast, while Mushfiqur Rahim—relieved of wicketkeeping duties to focus on his batting—was inexplicably slotted at six instead of his preferred four or five. 

Similarly, Mahmudullah Riyad, who had previously thrived at number four, was used as a floater. This positional uncertainty reflected a broader lack of strategy and cohesion in Bangladesh’s approach. 

The inclusion of Nurul Hasan, despite his lack of readiness for Test cricket, was another questionable decision. Hyped by sections of the local media, Nurul’s sloppy wicketkeeping and ineffective batting underscored the dangers of selecting players based on reputation rather than readiness. 

The Senior Players’ Disappointing Show

The experienced campaigners, Mahmudullah and Mominul Haque delivered dismal performances. Scoring just 19 and 16 runs respectively across the series, their technical fragilities were ruthlessly exposed by the West Indies pacers. 

Their failures were particularly damaging given the lack of contributions from the younger players. In a format that demands patience and adaptability, the senior players’ inability to lead by example left Bangladesh rudderless. 

Lessons to Learn and a Path Forward 

There is no shame in losing a match, but the manner of defeat matters. Bangladesh’s lack of fight and repeated mistakes were deeply disappointing. Test cricket rewards persistence, discipline, and adaptability—qualities that were glaringly absent in the Tigers’ performance. 

The team must revisit its fundamentals. Selection should prioritize readiness and role-specific expertise rather than hype or reputation. Players like Liton Das and Nurul Hasan need to be utilized in roles that suit their strengths. Senior players must step up, not just with the bat but as leaders in attitude and application. 

Bangladesh could also benefit from reconnecting with past mentors like Chandika Hathurusingha, whose Sri Lanka team has shown resilience and fights even in adverse conditions. 

As the dust settles on this series, one thing is clear: Bangladesh has the talent to compete at the highest level, but without the right mindset and preparation, that potential will remain unrealized. The Tigers must rise from this debacle, learning not just from their mistakes but from the examples of teams that thrive under pressure. Only then can they hope to carve a place for themselves in the annals of Test cricket.  

Thank You
Faisal Caesar

Saturday, July 14, 2018

Bangladesh’s Batting Woes Continue: A Test of Temperament in Jamaica

The morning session in Jamaica began with a glimmer of hope for Bangladesh. Liton Kumar Das, brimming with confidence, signalled his intent early on. A crisply timed stroke through the offside off Shannon Gabriel and a glorious extra-cover drive against Keemo Paul hinted at a positive approach. By lunch, the Tigers seemed to have clawed back into the game, buoyed by their bowlers’ disciplined effort to wrap up the West Indies innings. 

However, as the adage goes, “A good start is only half the battle.” The real challenge lay ahead. 

The Liton Dilemma: Aggression Without Application

Post-lunch, Bangladesh’s batting needed discipline—a shift from the Twenty20 instincts to the grind of Test cricket. Liton, facing Keemo Paul, initially showed glimpses of restraint, leaving deliveries outside the off-stump. Yet, his eagerness to play expansive shots betrayed a lack of temperament required for the longest format. 

Gabriel, a seasoned campaigner, sensed Liton’s impatience. A sharp delivery angled in from a short-of-a-length caught Liton off guard, trapping him plumb in front. The dismissal was a textbook example of poor shot selection—a flick attempted when a solid defensive approach was the need of the hour. 

Liton’s downfall underscored a recurring issue: the inability to adapt aggression to the demands of Test cricket. 

Mominul’s Carbon Copy Dismissal

Mominul Haque once hailed as Bangladesh’s Test specialist, walked in under pressure. His dismissal mirrored his first Test woes—a closed face against an angled delivery from Gabriel. This technical flaw, previously attributed to external coaching strategies, now seemed more intrinsic. 

The absence of Chandika Hathurusingha once blamed for Mominul’s struggles, raised uncomfortable questions about the player’s ability to learn and adapt. The so-called local solutions seemed ineffective, leaving Bangladesh’s middle order vulnerable yet again. 

Shakib and Tamim: A Partnership Without Purpose

With two wickets down, Bangladesh needed their senior players to steady the ship. Shakib Al Hasan and Tamim Iqbal stitched together a 59-run partnership, but it lacked the hallmarks of a proper Test innings. Boundaries flowed, but strike rotation—a crucial aspect of building pressure and tiring bowlers—was conspicuously absent. 

Jason Holder, the West Indies skipper, persisted with disciplined lines, knowing Shakib’s penchant for risky strokes. The gamble paid off. In the 24th over, Shakib misjudged a delivery he had previously dispatched, slicing it straight to the fielder. The captain’s dismissal, a loose shot against the run of play, highlighted a lack of focus and the tendency to repeat mistakes—a cardinal sin in Test cricket. 

The Collapse: A Familiar Tale

Shakib’s departure triggered a collapse. Mahmudullah Riyad, shuffling across his crease, fell lbw to a straight delivery—an example of flawed technique against pace. Tamim, who had shown intent to occupy the crease, succumbed to an angled delivery from Keemo Paul. 

Mushfiqur Rahim, often the savior in crises, batted with a reckless abandon more suited to limited-overs cricket. His brief stay at the crease was punctuated by boundaries but lacked the solidity needed to anchor the innings. A lazy jab at a short-of-a-length ball ended his resistance, leaving Bangladesh in dire straits. 

Nurul Hasan, touted as a promising talent, failed to deliver under pressure. A golden duck added to the misery, while Mehidy Hasan Miraz’s stay lasted just twelve balls. 

A Score Fit for T20, Not Tests

Bangladesh’s innings folded for under 150—a total more fitting for a Twenty20 match than a five-day contest. The inability to adjust to the demands of Test cricket was glaring. Poor shot selection, technical deficiencies, and a lack of mental resilience combined to script yet another batting debacle. 

Lessons to Learn, Changes to Make

Test cricket demands patience, application, and adaptability—qualities that seemed in short supply for Bangladesh in Jamaica. While the bowlers had shown fight in the morning, their efforts were squandered by a batting lineup unwilling or unable to grind it out. 

The Tigers must introspect. Senior players like Shakib and Mushfiqur need to lead by example while promising talents like Liton and Nurul must learn to temper aggression with discipline. The road ahead is long, but without fundamental changes in approach, Bangladesh risks repeating the same mistakes. 

As the sun set on Day 2, one thing was clear: the Tigers have the talent, but without the temperament, they will continue to struggle in the purest format of the game.

Thank You
Faisal Caesar 

Abu Jayed and Mehidy Hasan Miraz: The Architects of Bangladesh’s Day 2 Revival


In cricket, young pacers who understand the art of pitching it full and shaping the ball back at a consistent pace are invaluable assets. They embody resilience, running tirelessly even when the odds seem insurmountable, experimenting with angles and lengths in pursuit of breakthroughs. These bowlers often dismantle the most resolute defences and break partnerships, laying the foundation for their teammates to capitalize. 

For Bangladesh, Abu Jayed is one such bowler. Yet, his potential was underutilized on Day 1, leaving many to wonder why a talent of his calibre wasn’t given the ball earlier. 

But Day 2 in Jamaica told a different story—a tale of redemption and resurgence. 

The West Indies resumed their innings with Shimron Hetmyer and Roston Chase, both eager to pile on the misery for the visitors. The lacklustre bowling from the previous day likely emboldened the duo, but what greeted them on Day 2 was a transformed Bangladesh attack. 

Abu Jayed, the young seamer, took centre stage, defying the oppressive heat and humidity with a spirited spell of fast-medium bowling. He hit ideal lengths consistently—back of a length and full deliveries aimed with precision—and maintained a steady pace around 80 mph. It was this consistency, combined with his ability to move the ball, that made Jayed a different bowler altogether. 

Jayed struck early, dismissing the dangerous Hetmyer with a sharp delivery that leapt off a length outside off stump, forcing an edge. Shortly after, Chase fell victim to a full delivery angled in, trapped plumb in front. The two set batsmen, who had looked poised to build a commanding total, were sent back to the pavilion, leaving the West Indies rattled and sparking a pertinent question: 

Why wasn’t Jayed used more on Day 1, when the pitch still offered assistance for his style of bowling? 

The answer lies with Shakib Al Hasan and the Bangladesh think tank. Perhaps they had banked on spin to unsettle the West Indies, given the traditional vulnerability of Caribbean batsmen against quality spin. While the strategy was logical on paper, its execution faltered due to erratic line and length from the bowlers. On a track with early life, the decision to hold back Jayed—whose full-length deliveries and ability to bring the ball back in could have been game-changing—appears questionable in hindsight. 

Moreover, opening the bowling with a spinner on such surfaces may work in shorter formats like T20s, but in the tactical grind of Test cricket, it often proves counterproductive. 

With Hetmyer and Chase gone, the complexion of the game shifted. The Tigers were on the prowl, and Jayed’s early strikes had set the stage for Mehidy Hasan Miraz to weave his magic. 

Miraz, a proven performer in Test cricket, had been one of the few bright spots on Day 1. On Day 2, he elevated his game, varying his pace and refining his lengths to perfection. His guile and control brought swift rewards. 

Shane Dowrich, the gritty wicketkeeper-batsman, was lured into a false stroke by a slower delivery that dipped deceptively, resulting in a tame dismissal. Keemo Paul followed soon after, edging a full delivery, and Miguel Cummins was trapped lbw the very next ball. With that, Miraz secured yet another five-wicket haul in Test cricket, a testament to his craft and determination. 

Even as the West Indies skipper Jason Holder threatened to forge a tail-end resistance reminiscent of their series against Sri Lanka, Jayed returned to banish the spectre of Shannon Gabriel with pace and precision, sealing the innings. 

The turnaround was complete. Bangladesh’s bowlers, led by the youthful exuberance of Jayed and the seasoned skill of Miraz, had clawed their team back into the contest. It was a performance marked by grit, adaptability, and, above all, a refusal to yield. 

Now, the onus shifts to the Bangladesh batsmen. The bowlers have laid the groundwork with their hard-earned breakthroughs; it is up to the batsmen to ensure that the efforts of Jayed and Miraz are not squandered. 

Test cricket, after all, is a team game, and the Tigers must now come together to build on this momentum. As Day 2 drew to a close, one thing was clear: Abu Jayed had arrived as a force to be reckoned with, and Mehidy Hasan Miraz had reaffirmed his status as Bangladesh’s spinning lynchpin. Together, they reminded the cricketing world that even in adversity, the Tigers have the heart to fight back. 

Thank You
Faisal Caesar