Adam Gilchrist: The Game-Changer Who Redefined Cricket

When Ian Healy stepped aside, Australia didn’t just replace a wicketkeeper—they revolutionized the role. Enter Adam Gilchrist, a cricketer who was as entertaining as he was destructive. If Healy had been an obdurate gnome, Gilchrist was a gremlin someone had fed after midnight—trouble written all over his face, his grin radiating the kind of mischief that spelt doom for bowlers worldwide. His batting wasn’t just aggressive; it was seismic, the kind that sent tremors through the opposition and rewrote expectations for wicket-keepers in international cricket. 

A Batsman Ahead of His Time

Before the age of T20, when batsmen still measured their innings in patience and discipline, Gilchrist played as if he had no time to waste. He treated Test cricket like a personal playground, smashing bowling attacks with schoolboy exuberance and an unshakable belief in his natural game. His approach wasn’t dictated by complicated technique or textbook perfection—it was a simple philosophy of hitting the ball the way his father had taught him. And yet, beneath this casual demeanour was a player of extraordinary skill and precision. 

At a time when many of England’s best batsmen struggled to last long enough to reach double figures, Gilchrist batted as if the concept of pressure did not apply to him. His runs didn’t just accumulate; they came in bursts of destruction. Every innings he played seemed to land on a match like a meteorite—obliterating the opposition, changing the course of the game in a matter of overs. 

And unlike players such as Kevin Pietersen, whose free-hitting often became an excuse for reckless dismissals, Gilchrist’s style never compromised his consistency. His ability to counterattack wasn’t just thrilling; it was the kind of merciless efficiency that won games. 

The Art of Ruining the Contest

Some of his most impactful innings came when the match was delicately poised—when the opposition finally sensed an opportunity. That’s when Gilchrist did his worst damage. 

During the 2001 Ashes, just as England started to believe they had a grip on a game, Gilchrist would walk in and obliterate any hope of a close contest. His innings didn’t just tilt matches in Australia’s favour; they crushed the spirit of the opposition. 

His record-breaking 149 in the 2007 World Cup final was another example of how he turned high-stakes encounters into one-sided demolitions. With that one innings, he transformed what should have been a hard-fought final into a mere formality. For a player who spent most of his ODI career opening the batting, his sheer impact in knockout games was unparalleled. 

Gilchrist was the kind of cricketer who made the sport unfair. Australia didn’t just have a great batting lineup; they had a secret weapon at No. 7, capable of launching a game into a different dimension. 

A Wicketkeeper Who Made Everything Look Easy 

But if Gilchrist’s batting was a nightmare for opponents, his wicketkeeping was an equally frustrating spectacle of ease and efficiency. 

At a time when teams struggled to find a balance between batting and keeping, Gilchrist made both look effortless. His 472 ODI dismissals—a record at the time of his retirement—stood as a testament to his brilliance behind the stumps. He formed iconic partnerships with Glenn McGrath and Brett Lee, ranking second and fourth in history for the most wickets taken in collaboration with a keeper. 

Yet, for all his success, some critics questioned his pure wicketkeeping ability. Victorian purists argued that Darren Berry was the superior gloveman. But Gilchrist was more than just a wicketkeeper—he was a cricketer who reshaped expectations. In the end, the debate over technical superiority became irrelevant because Gilchrist offered something no other keeper had: the ability to single-handedly change the outcome of a match. 

The Statistical Impact: Dominance by the Numbers 

Numbers rarely capture the full essence of a player, but Gilchrist’s statistics paint a picture of sheer dominance. 

- Test batting average: 47.60 (exceptional for a wicketkeeper) 

- Strike rate in Tests:82.26 (46% faster than his batting peers) 

- 17 Test centuries, 14 of which led to victories

- 100 sixes in Test cricket (second only to Brendon McCullum at the time)

While many great batsmen compiled runs, Gilchrist redefined how quickly they could be scored. His strike rate, far superior to his peers, gave Australian bowlers more time to take 20 wickets. He didn’t just contribute; he accelerated victory. 

Defining Innings: When Gilchrist Changed the Game

There were countless matches where Gilchrist’s innings turned the tide, but some stand out as defining moments of his career: 

- Hobart, 1999 – The Great Chase

  In only his second Test, Gilchrist walked in at **5 for 126, chasing 369 against Pakistan**. With an unbeaten 149*, he carried Australia to victory, announcing his arrival on the biggest stage. 

- Mumbai, 2001 – The Forgotten Masterpiece

  While India’s legendary comeback in the series is widely remembered, Gilchrist’s impact in the first Test is often overlooked. He smashed 122 off 112 balls on a turning track, leading Australia to a ten-wicket win and extending their record winning streak to 16 Tests. 

- Johannesburg & Cape Town, 2002 – 342 Runs Without Being Dismissed

  Across two Tests in South Africa, Gilchrist scored 342 runs off 321 balls without getting out. Australia won both games, proving that his ability to turn matches was as consistent as it was brutal. 

- Perth, 2006 – The Monty Massacre

  During the Ashes, Gilchrist unleashed 102 off 59 balls, reducing Monty Panesar to rubble and sealing a series victory in a blink. 

- Kandy, 2004 – The Underrated Gem

On a viciously spinning pitch against Muralitharan, Gilchrist was promoted to number 3, walking in at 2 for 26 (effectively 2 for -65). He smashed 144 off 185 balls, leading Australia to a remarkable comeback win. 

In every one of these moments, Gilchrist didn’t just score runs—he changed the very nature of the game. 

The Walk: The Myth and Reality of Gilchrist’s Morality

Gilchrist’s reputation extended beyond his performances; he was known for “walking” when he knew he was out. Cricket’s moralists hailed him as a paragon of sportsmanship as if his act of honesty was the equivalent of channelling Gandhi and Mandela in one stroke. 

Yet, as Ian Healy pointed out, Gilchrist never actually found himself in another situation where he had to walk again. And for all the sanctity of that one act, he was still part of a team that perfected dubious appealing and aggressive sledging. 

His sportsmanship was real—but it wasn’t absolute. 

Legacy: The Once-in-a-Lifetime Player

By the time he retired in 2008, Gilchrist had done more than just break records—he had reshaped cricket itself. 

- He redefined the role of a wicketkeeper, proving that one could be a world-class batsman and an elite gloveman. 

- He changed the psychology of Test cricket, showing that counterattacking was not just an option but a lethal weapon. 

- He helped Australia dominate world cricket for nearly a decade, winning three World Cups (1999, 2003, 2007). 

Gilchrist was not just the best wicketkeeper-batsman of his generation; he was an event, a spectacle, a force of nature. His batting made cricket feel unfair, his keeping made it look easy, and his very presence on the field made opponents fear what was coming next.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Miracles in Life and Cricket: The Tale of Glenn Maxwell’s Heroics

To believe in miracles is not an absurdity—it is, in fact, a leap of faith, a sign that you trust in possibilities beyond logic. Miracles, however, do not arrive uninvited; they require struggle, adversity, and the will to persevere. It is when everything seems lost, when the odds tower like giants, that miracles are born. And what is life, if not a journey of unexpected triumphs? What is cricket, if not a stage where ordinary men script extraordinary feats?  

On November 7, 2023, in the sweltering Mumbai heat, one such miracle unfolded—a cricketing spectacle that shall be recounted for generations. Afghanistan, riding the crest of an improbable campaign in the ICC Cricket World Cup, were poised to topple mighty Australia, reducing them to **91 for 7**. But one man—Glenn Maxwell—had other plans. From the wreckage of a crumbling batting order, Maxwell emerged not just as a saviour but as a force of nature, crafting one of the most extraordinary innings in the history of ODI cricket.  

The Setup for a Miracle: A Hopeless Start

The Australian innings began with a collapse of shocking proportions, as Afghanistan’s bowlers—like skilled craftsmen—picked apart the opposition. Omarzai’s probing deliveries, Rashid Khan’s guile, and Mujeeb Ur Rahman’s mastery had reduced Australia to near ruin. By the ninth over, when Maxwell arrived at the crease, his team stood on the brink of humiliation. On just his second delivery, a miscommunication with Marnus Labuschagne resulted in a run-out—another nail in the coffin. What followed seemed inevitable: Australia’s hopes disintegrating, and the Afghans scripting another cricketing fairy tale.  

But miracles thrive on defiance. It takes a moment of self-belief, even when no one believes in you, to alter destiny. Maxwell, the showman often criticized for his reckless abandon, summoned a different side of himself: not just a hitter, but a warrior.  

From Disaster to Deliverance: Hercules Awakes

Maxwell's innings began under dire circumstances, but every stroke he played seemed to rewrite fate. The Afghan bowlers, relentless until then, found themselves at the mercy of a man possessed. Maxwell smashed Mujeeb over his head and Noor Ahmad into the stands. Clean, brutal, and fearless, his shots defied conventional wisdom. He eschewed footwork, planting his feet like a colossus, swinging with the might of Hercules.  

Yet it wasn’t just his bat that carried Australia—it was his grit. The Mumbai humidity took its toll, sapping his energy, and in the 41st over, Maxwell dropped to his knees, visibly in agony. The next batter, Adam Zampa, stood anxiously by the boundary, waiting to replace him. But Maxwell wasn’t done. He summoned the physio, patched himself up, and returned to his mission—a man determined not to be undone by either the conditions or his own body.  

This was no longer a mere cricket match. It was Maxwell versus the elements, Maxwell versus fate. And as he stood tall, his batting became an expression of defiance and artistry. Even Pat Cummins, at the other end, played his role to perfection—not with runs, but by holding firm, facing 66 deliveries for his mere 12 runs, anchoring the partnership that allowed Maxwell to unleash devastation.  

When the Impossible Becomes Reality

Every miracle demands a twist—a moment when destiny flirts with failure. Maxwell’s came on 33, when Mujeeb dropped a sitter at fine leg. It was a moment that could have ended the dream, but instead, it breathed new life into it. Maxwell punished the Afghans with a flurry of boundaries, each hit echoing louder than the last. The reverse sweeps, the switch-hits, and the towering sixes—every shot embodied not just skill but the refusal to accept defeat.  

In just 76 balls, Maxwell reached his century. But he wasn’t finished. His next hundred came in only 52 deliveries, a blur of brilliance that left the crowd in disbelief and the opposition bewildered.  

The final flourish came with Australia needing 21 runs from 24 balls. Maxwell, now within touching distance of a double century, took Mujeeb apart—6, 6, 4, 6. With a flick of his wrists and the power of his shoulders, he etched his name into cricket’s folklore. His unbeaten **201** not only sealed Australia’s victory but also broke records:  

- The highest score by a batter at number six or lower in the history of ODI cricket.  

- The first double-hundred by an Australian in ODIs.  

- The third double-ton in a World Cup.  

- A record 202-run partnership for the eighth wicket or lower.  

A Legend is Born: Glenn Maxwell’s Miracle  

Maxwell’s knock was more than just a cricketing performance—it was a triumph of spirit over circumstance. From a concussion after a freak golf cart accident to the brink of defeat in Mumbai, he defied expectations at every turn. His innings reminded the world that cricket, like life, thrives on moments where the improbable becomes inevitable.  

And as Pat Cummins—his silent partner in this Herculean feat—lifted Maxwell's bat in celebration, the message was clear: miracles do happen, not by chance but by sheer will.  

Beyond the Records: The Soul of the Game

In cricket, as in life, miracles reveal themselves when we are most tested. Maxwell’s knock wasn’t just about statistics—it was a story of perseverance, self-belief, and unwavering courage. It was a reminder that cricket is more than numbers on a scoreboard; it is a stage for human endeavour, where the ordinary and the extraordinary collide.  

Maxwell’s innings also rekindled the beauty of sport—how it can inspire, uplift, and astonish. The concept of a "miracle" often carries connotations of divine intervention, but in this case, it was the triumph of human effort. Maxwell’s bat was the wand, and his performance was pure magic.  

So, what is cricket without miracles? Just another game. But with stories like Glenn Maxwell’s, it becomes a narrative of wonder—where every match offers the possibility of redemption, where the impossible becomes possible, and where dreams, however far-fetched, can come true.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

 

The Dichotomy of Laws and the Spirit of Cricket: A Critical Analysis

Cricket, like many sports, has rules designed to maintain fairness and structure, but what sets it apart is the concept of the "Spirit of the Game." Rooted in traditions dating back to the 19th century, this unwritten code serves as a moral compass for players. However, the subjective nature of this spirit has often clashed with the rigid laws of the game, creating controversies that blur the line between gamesmanship and unsportsmanlike conduct. An exploration of recent incidents involving the likes of Suraj Randiv, Sachitra Senanayake, Shakib Al Hasan, and others highlights the enduring tension between the two paradigms.

The Randiv-Sehwag Controversy (2010): A Case of Malicious Intent  

During a group-stage match in Sri Lanka's Tri-Nation tournament, Virender Sehwag was on 99, with India needing just one run to win. Sri Lankan off-spinner Suraj Randiv bowled a deliberate no-ball to prevent Sehwag from reaching his century. Although the Indian opener hit the no-ball for six, the extra run ensured the game ended, leaving Sehwag stranded on 99. 

Reports later indicated that it was Tillakaratne Dilshan who suggested the no-ball in Sinhalese:"If you want, you can bowl a no-ball."* Although Kumar Sangakkara, the Sri Lankan captain, claimed he would address the matter, the incident caused an uproar, with critics arguing that it violated the spirit of cricket. Despite the subsequent apologies and inquiries, the episode raised an important question: 

Does adhering strictly to the rules justify such manipulation?

Senanayake’s Mankading of Buttler (2014): Rules vs. Spirit  

A similar controversy arose in 2014 when Sri Lankan bowler Sachitra Senanayake dismissed England’s Jos Buttler through a Mankad at Edgbaston after issuing multiple warnings. Although this mode of dismissal is legal, it was seen by many as unsporting. However, Mahela Jayawardene defended the action, emphasizing that they had warned Buttler twice and were merely enforcing the law.

The incident underscored an essential paradox: If a player gains an unfair advantage by leaving the crease early, does enforcing the law make the bowler unsporting? The Sri Lankan side argued that they had upheld both the spirit and the law by providing fair warnings, but the cricketing world remained divided.

Shakib Al Hasan’s Timed-Out Appeal (2023): Spirit Under Pressure  

In the 2023 World Cup, Bangladesh captain Shakib Al Hasan appealed to have Angelo Mathews dismissed “timed out” after Mathews was delayed due to a broken helmet strap. The ICC rules mandate that a new batter must face the next delivery within two minutes, and Mathews had exceeded that limit. Shakib's decision to appeal—although technically correct—provoked outrage from Mathews, who labelled the move "disgraceful." 

In his defence, Shakib argued that he acted within the laws: "Right or wrong, I had to do what was necessary to help my team win." This incident demonstrated how **following the letter of the law can still lead to accusations of violating the spirit of the game. Mathews' frustration highlighted the emotional dimension of cricket, where practical decisions often feel unsporting to those affected.

A Historical Perspective: WG Grace to Bairstow and Beyond  

The conflict between the spirit of the game and competitive instincts is not new. In 1882, the legendary WG Grace famously ran out Sammy Jones, exploiting a break in play when Jones was patting down the pitch. Grace’s actions, though legal, were seen as violating the spirit of the game—a sentiment echoed in the Jonny Bairstow stumping incident during the 2023 Ashes. Australian wicketkeeper Alex Carey dismissed Bairstow, who had carelessly wandered out of his crease between deliveries. England supporters cried foul, yet Carey’s dismissal was entirely within the laws

Similarly, when Justin Langer was given not out in a 1999 Test despite edging the ball, he chose not to walk—a practice not uncommon among modern players, including Stuart Broad. These examples demonstrate that **players often prioritize winning within the rules over adhering to an abstract ideal of sportsmanship.

The Evolving Nature of the Spirit of Cricket  

The concept of the spirit of cricket has always been fluid, subject to interpretation and context. The MCC's preamble to the Laws of Cricket encourages players to act in a sportsmanlike manner, but the line between competitiveness and unsporting behaviour is often blurred.

When cricketers like Mathews or Buttler face dismissals they consider unfair, it exposes the limitations of this subjective spirit. The ambiguity surrounding the spirit of the game** also complicates the role of umpires, who must uphold the laws while navigating the emotional responses of players.

Striking a Balance: Laws vs. Spirit  

The incidents involving Randiv, Senanayake, Shakib, and others demonstrate that cricket’s laws are not always aligned with the spirit of the game. This disconnect suggests that the MCC and ICC may need to refine the concept of the spirit to avoid such conflicts. Should players be expected to sacrifice strategic advantages for the sake of an abstract ideal? Or should the spirit of cricket evolve to accommodate the competitive realities of modern sport?

At the heart of these debates lies a fundamental question: Can cricket truly uphold both the laws and the spirit, or must one give way to the other? In practice, players often prioritize the laws, knowing that their careers and team objectives depend on winning matches. As Shakib pointed out, "If it’s in the rules, I don’t mind taking those chances."

This pragmatic approach reflects a shift in mindset, where competitiveness takes precedence over sentiment.

Redefining the Spirit of the Game  

Cricket is a sport governed by laws, yet it is enriched by the ideals embodied in the spirit of the game. However, as recent controversies illustrate, the tension between these two elements remains unresolved**. While the rules provide clarity, the spirit is inherently subjective, leading to disagreements and controversies. 

Perhaps it is time for the cricketing authorities to reconsider how the spirit of the game is defined and applied. In an era where every decision is scrutinized, players will naturally prioritize the laws to ensure fairness and success. A revised approach to the spirit of cricket could bridge the gap between tradition and modernity**, allowing the game to evolve while maintaining its integrity. After all, playing by the rules should not be seen as a betrayal of the sport’s ethos but as a commitment to its essence.

The question remains: Can the spirit of the game evolve alongside the sport itself?

Until the laws and spirit align, cricket will continue to navigate this delicate balance—where every appeal, dismissal, and controversy becomes a reflection of the sport's evolving identity.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar  

Ibrahim Zadran: The Resilient Pillar of Afghan Cricket’s Evolution

In the storied Test at Chittagong in 2019, I had the privilege of witnessing a young Ibrahim Zadran at the crease—a batsman markedly different in approach in a team renowned for explosive power hitting. Where many of his compatriots embodied Afghanistan's aggressive flair, Zadran’s classical style and patience set him apart.

That day, Zadran’s innings was a display of unyielding grit. Facing 208 deliveries, he compiled a hard-fought 87, an innings more notable for its temperament than its tally. His stance was immediately striking: close to a textbook posture, with a compact guard that reflected a rare discipline. It was a stance rooted in classical principles, coupled with an unbreakable defensive technique that absorbed pressure over long spells.

This resilience has become Zadran’s hallmark, fueling his transformation into a stabilizing force in Afghan cricket—a player who grants his team the breathing room needed amidst the pressures of the modern game. Fast forward to the ICC Cricket World Cup 2023, and Zadran’s steadfast approach has been instrumental in Afghanistan’s success. His unshakeable resolve and controlled aggression have provided the anchor around which Afghanistan's lineup has flourished, underscoring the maturation of their batting philosophy on the global stage.

It’s no surprise, then, that Zadran has etched his name into history as Afghanistan’s first centurion in a Cricket World Cup. His achievements are more than a personal milestone; they symbolize a shift in Afghanistan's cricketing narrative, one where the calculated, composed innings can stand shoulder to shoulder with the thrilling firepower of his peers.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Pakistan Cricket: The Unsolvable Puzzle

Few teams in world cricket evoke such contrasting emotions as Pakistan. They are, at once, a riddle and a force of nature, capable of soaring brilliance and baffling collapse. Just when you expect them to ignite the arena, they somehow set their own feet on fire. Yet, when the opposition thinks they have been humiliated enough, Pakistan responds with a brutal reversal—smacking backs, slapping faces, and landing jabs to the ribs that leave their rivals gasping for air. And just when you try to make sense of them, the enigma deepens. No one—not statisticians, analysts, or cricketing sages—has ever managed to define the Pakistan cricket team.  

Their governing body, the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), is a carousel of leadership changes—spinning in circles without a clear destination. Even railway engines know their destinations; the PCB does not. The country’s sports media is an arena of blame, where critics bicker endlessly, often as much with each other as with India, the eternal rival. Fans, always passionate, remain on a rollercoaster of emotions—swinging between despair and delirium. Tales of in-fighting, ego clashes, political interference, and wasted talent haunt their history. Yet despite the absence of a definitive system, Pakistan produces extraordinary players who emerge seemingly from nowhere, defying logic to win improbable matches.

 The 2023 World Cup: A Mixed Bag

This year’s ICC Cricket World Cup in India has been another chapter in Pakistan’s unpredictable saga. They scraped past the Netherlands in an unconvincing start, dismantled Sri Lanka in a high-scoring thriller, and were annihilated by India. Against Australia, they looked like schoolboys chasing leather. Afghanistan exploited their tactical cluelessness. And just when hope flickered, they snatched defeat from the jaws of victory against South Africa, leaving hearts shattered across Pakistan.  

It felt like the story was over—Pakistan’s campaign seemed dead and buried. But this is Pakistan, after all. Freakishly fractious. Perpetually mysterious. Unpredictably brilliant.

A Tale of Two Matches: Australia and New Zealand

In Bangalore, Australia handed Pakistan a tactical lesson. Choosing to bowl first, Pakistan invited David Warner to feast on their wayward bowling. Australia’s batters plundered a mountain of runs, and although Pakistan's response began promisingly, they unravelled—as they often do. Warner found his form, Adam Zampa rediscovered his bite, and Pakistan’s fielding deteriorated to comical levels.  

Then came a crucial encounter against New Zealand—an injury-stricken side that Pakistan had every reason to exploit. Winning the toss seemed a simple enough task: bat first, use Fakhar Zaman's firepower, and hammer the Kiwis on a flat pitch with short boundaries. Instead, Pakistan’s pace-dominated attack backfired spectacularly. Kane Williamson and Rachin Ravindra unleashed mayhem, piling on 400 runs while exposing the frailties of Pakistan’s bowling.  

Shaheen Shah Afridi, hailed as the world’s best bowler by the ICC rankings, became a pale shadow of himself. Leaking 90 runs in his quota of 10 overs, Afridi broke a dubious record—only for Haris Rauf, who had earlier conceded 85, to hold the "achievement" briefly. The comedy of errors was complete, and Pakistan's defensive fielding offered no respite.  

As New Zealand toyed with Pakistan’s bowlers, putting on 140 runs in the final 14 overs, it felt like the last nail in the coffin. Hopes dwindled, and fans braced for another grim farewell—this one destined for Lahore airport at the end of the group stage.

But This is Pakistan

And then, as if from nowhere, Pakistan roared back. Enter Fakhar Zaman. Before this match, his recent performances read like a tale of mediocrity—scores of 4, 30, 27, 4, and 12. Yet against Bangladesh in Kolkata, he rediscovered his mojo, and now, in this do-or-die match, he wielded his bat like Muhammad Ali’s fists. His strokes weren’t just hits; they stung like bee swarms.  

In the third over, Fakhar smashed Trent Boult for two fours and a six, turning what should have been a measured start into a fiery statement. The 17 runs Boult conceded marked his most expensive over in World Cup history. Boult’s next over went for 16 more, as Babar Azam, playing the sheet-anchor role, elegantly punctuated Fakhar’s fireworks with crisp drives.  

Tim Southee and Mitchell Santner fared no better. Fakhar treated the white ball as though it were a football, dispatching it beyond Bangalore’s boundaries with glee. Glenn Phillips experienced firsthand what it means to be dismantled, and Santner was taken apart ruthlessly. Pakistan was in the zone, and when Pakistan enters that zone, cricket ceases to follow earthly logic. It becomes a cosmic spectacle. The stars realign. The multiverse smiles. And—just as the crowd began to believe—the heavens opened.  

Rain poured down, and Pakistan found themselves 10 runs ahead according to the DLS method. When play resumed, Pakistan danced through the revised chase of 342 in 41 overs. Fakhar, undeterred, continued his rampage. Ish Sodhi, introduced into the attack, was thrashed for 32 in two overs. By the time rain intervened for good, Pakistan had done enough. The match was abandoned. Pakistan, improbably, emerged victorious.  

Defying Logic, Yet Again

Analysts are still scratching their heads. Fans are still reeling. New Zealand, battered and bewildered, have no answers. And the cricketing gods, as they so often do when Pakistan is involved, are left puzzled—unable to make sense of how this mercurial team continues to defy every rule of cricketing logic.  

In the end, it’s futile to define Pakistan cricket. It is chaos embodied, beauty in disorder. They are a team that refuses to be pinned down by statistics, patterns, or logic. One day, they burn their own house down; the next, they storm your castle. And just when you think they are finished, they reappear—victorious, unpredictable, and unstoppable. This is Pakistan. Freakish, mysterious, and always worth watching.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar