When two best Test sides in the world battle for supremacy
then you will certainly expect a mouthwatering contest. South
Africa and England
are the two most dangerous sides in Test cricket at present and before the Test
series started they created enough hype of a thrilling and exciting contest.
My mind was focused on Oval and was dying to watch some
daring attitude from both the sides. But sadly, I ended up watching one side’s
total supremacy and the other’s timid surrender.
Oval offered a one sided contest which was not supposed to
be. To essay a gritting contest both the teams must show the same kind of
intention and attitude to make the contest simmering.
Where was England ?
Why they failed to live up to their reputation? Why did they fail miserably?
There were reasons behind this flop show.
Poor display by the English bowlers:
The Oval track was flat earlier and in course of time it got
slow and low. A fast bowler needs to show intensity, hostility and aggression
to crack down a batsman’s grit on such tracks. The English bowlers lacked the
intensity to pitch the ball up to the batsmen and bowl on a fullish length;
they lacked the aggression to generate a consistent pace and the hostility to
put shiver down the batsmen’s spine – Anderson ,
Broad and Bresnan were impotent. You can’t blame the track as on the same track
Steyn and Morkel were instrumental.
Again, the track was tailor made for Swann to execute his
guiles. But to the surprise of all he proved a total flop – a lot of off-spin
without a doosra. As Mark Nicholas pointed out, “On slow pitches the doosra is
the trump card simply because the batsmen cannot play back so safely. The
doosra is the unknown: it is the fear of the unknown.”
I just feel the addition of Monty Panesar could have given
the English attack some added variety given the fact that the Proteas aren’t
good against spin and the track was on the slower side. A spin duet of left and
arm combination might have proved fruitful.
Absence of a Paul Collingwood at slip, gully and backward
point:
Over the years the English have squandered plenty of chances
at slip, gully and backward point positions. In the past such positions were
guarded by Paul Collingwood and for which dangerous partnerships were broken
most often by some athletic fielding display. On the second day Andrew Strauss
dropped Hashim Amla while fielding at slip and in the end it proved too costly.
Poor batting temperament:
Resistance was the order of the day when England
came out to bat in the second innings. But in turn they kept on losing wickets
after wickets. Other than Ian Bell none of the batting stalwarts exhibited the
kind of grit and perseverance shown by Amla, Smith and Kallis. Steyn and Morkel
were sharp and pacy but while batting for the number 1 Test side in the world
you should apply application rather than poor temperament.
Thank You
Faisal Caesar
No comments:
Post a Comment