Off the field, Bangladesh cricket seems trapped in a lugubrious tale of controversy and mismanagement. On the field, there’s a disturbing dearth of action, leaving sports journalists confined to stories of off-field troubles rather than spirited play. The missed opportunities this season have deepened frustrations, particularly as the Bangladesh Under-19, Under-23, and A teams embarked on tours to England and Singapore, hoping to bring back triumphs and perhaps ignite some pride. Yet, the summer instead played out as a chapter of relentless disappointment, dashing expectations and highlighting structural issues within Bangladesh’s cricketing establishment.
With promising rosters and several internationally seasoned players, there was an underlying hope that Bangladesh’s young squads would showcase grit and skill. However, the season spiralled into a dismal affair. The A team, which included 13 players with international experience, stumbled through seven losses out of eight matches. In the final one-dayer against the England Lions, they managed a solitary consolation win, but it did little to eclipse the overall performance—timid at best, catastrophic at worst.
The Under-19 and Under-23 teams fared no better. In England’s U-19 tri-nation tournament, the young Bangladeshi squad struggled against both England and Pakistan, lacking the fortitude to pull off any substantial success. Meanwhile, in Singapore, the U-23 team suffered a surprising and humiliating loss to a relatively less experienced UAE side in the Asian Cricket Council Emerging Teams tournament. The results underscored a harsh reality: no amount of talent or potential on paper can translate into victories without the structural support of active, ongoing cricket experience.
Should such outcomes have come as a surprise? In retrospect, the answer is likely no. Despite undergoing conditioning camps before the tours, the players lacked match readiness—a state that is difficult, if not impossible, to cultivate without consistent domestic cricket. Conditioning alone cannot substitute for active competition; it is regular play, after all, that maintains rhythm, focus, and adaptability in the face of varied pitches and conditions. Since the last Zimbabwe tour, Bangladesh’s players have seen limited active cricket, leading to a lack of confidence and rhythm in their performances. Expecting players to excel in challenging overseas conditions without a solid domestic grounding is akin to sending a band into battle with blunted swords.
The disappointing tour results have stirred an outcry among the press and cricketing experts. Yet, rather than solely faulting the players for underperformance, it’s time to scrutinize the cricketing ecosystem that has left them unprepared. The responsibility lies largely with the cricket board and officials whose oversight has left Bangladesh’s domestic circuit under-prioritized. An idle domestic calendar not only denies players valuable match practice but also diminishes the overall competitiveness of the cricketing landscape. In a scenario where basic preparation is neglected, the National Cricket Board must bear accountability for these outcomes.
Yet, amid this disheartening picture, there are glimmers of hope. Despite the collective struggles, a handful of young players stood out, showing potential even under challenging circumstances. In the Under-19 team, Musaddek Hossain and Sadman Islam demonstrated commendable resilience and adaptability in the tri-nation tournament, emerging as promising candidates for the future. Meanwhile, Soumya Sarkar from the U-23 team displayed an encouraging aptitude, and from the A team, Anamul Haque and Elias Sunny managed to show consistency even amid a turbulent tour. These performances, while modest in a broader context, signal that Bangladesh’s cricketing future could still harbour promise if nurtured properly.
Moreover, such tours, particularly to England, can serve as critical learning experiences, fostering self-awareness and resilience among young players. Touring abroad has a way of exposing individual and collective shortcomings, helping players to build the rock-solid temperament needed for higher-level cricket. This summer’s missteps, though disappointing, offer a chance for reflection and growth. Bangladesh cricket can still reclaim momentum by learning from these tough tours and placing renewed emphasis on consistent domestic cricket as a preparatory ground for international challenges.
The setbacks of this season should not simply be dismissed as inevitable losses. Instead, they represent a wake-up call to reinvigorate Bangladesh’s cricketing infrastructure. By addressing the weaknesses in scheduling, player development, and domestic competition, Bangladesh cricket can begin to move past this season of frustration and look forward to a future where the field—not the headlines—commands attention.
Thank you
Faisal Caesar