Mushfiqur Rahim at 100 Tests: The Relentless Craftsman Who Willed Bangladesh into Belonging

The childish celebration that spans for more than two decades - The cherubic smile that softened even the most exhausting days – The celebration with a roar and clenched fist. The long, meditative hours of batting practice under a punishing sun. These are the images that surface whenever the name Mushfiqur Rahim is uttered in Bangladesh cricket. They are not merely memories; they are fragments of a national journey—an epic told through the life of a cricketer who refused to surrender to history, circumstance, or mediocrity.

Now, as Mushfiqur becomes the first Bangladeshi to step into the rarefied company of 100 Test cricketers, his milestone demands more than celebration. It demands a reckoning with what he has symbolised: resilience in a cricket culture built on the uneasy coexistence of soaring dreams and cruel limitations.

Bangladesh has played 155 Tests in its 25-year history. Mushfiqur has featured in nearly two-thirds of them. That is not longevity; that is institutional memory.

A Career Forged in Adversity

When Mushfiqur Rahim first walked onto Lord’s in 2005, he looked startlingly young—almost child-like—set against the theatre of cricket’s most storied stage. His tiny frame and cautious smile contrasted violently with the four-pronged English pace attack poised to dismantle an inexperienced Bangladesh side. Yet he resisted. It was not a match-saving act, not even a noteworthy statistical contribution, but it contained something Bangladesh cricket desperately needed in those days: defiance.

Defiance from a team mocked for simply being present.

Defiance from a boy who could easily have been swallowed by the cynicism that enveloped Bangladesh cricket in those formative years.

Through the next two decades, that thread of resistance evolved into a science—a disciplined, almost monastic approach to preparation that became Mushfiqur’s signature. He was neither the most flamboyant nor the most naturally gifted, but he became the most dependable. And in a nation where sporting fragility has often been cultural, Mushfiqur’s discipline was radical.

The Last of a Generation

The modern pillars of Bangladesh cricket—Shakib Al Hasan, Mashrafe Mortaza, Tamim Iqbal, Mahmudullah—have all now faded from the arena. Yet Mushfiqur remains, not because he had fewer reasons to retire but because he had more reasons to keep going. When he quit T20Is and ODIs, whispers grew louder that he was nearing the end. Mushfiqur instead treated the speculation as an indictment of his work ethic.

He responded the only way he knows: with runs, with fitness, with sweat, with monastic routine.

At 38, he is still in the “why retire?” phase of his journey—an astonishing mindset in a cricket culture that has historically lacked long-term athletic conditioning, infrastructure, or continuity.

The Arc of a Craftsman

Mushfiqur’s career has not been smooth—it has been sculpted. He entered Test cricket with technical flaws, fought through years of inconsistency, and rebuilt himself. Coaches like Dav Whatmore and Jamie Siddons tinkered with his backlift, his pull shot, and his game against pace. Tamim recalls that the raw talent was never the story; the story was the work ethic. Mushfiqur made himself.

He did so under difficult conditions: a brittle batting order, a domestic structure still learning how to behave like a Test system, and a national expectation perpetually oscillating between premature hope and volatile disappointment.

His double-hundred in Galle in 2013—Bangladesh’s first—was not just a statistical milestone; it felt like an emancipation. Mominul Haque, who debuted in that match, remembers it as a watershed, an innings that allowed younger batters to believe that Bangladesh could dream beyond survival.

That was the year Mushfiqur turned the corner. His average leapt past 50, his discipline matured, and his role crystallised: he became Bangladesh’s immovable spine.

Captain, Keeper, Workhorse

Few cricketers anywhere have carried a national team the way Mushfiqur has.

He captained 34 Tests.

He kept wicket in 55.

He combined both roles in 28 matches—second only to MS Dhoni in Test history.

And he still averaged over 41 as captain.

When he finally relinquished the gloves in 2019, his batting blossomed further. The numbers reveal the story of a cricketer who aged like a craftsman, not an athlete: smarter, calmer, technically tighter, more self-assured.

Since 2013, Mushfiqur has averaged over 42 in 69 Tests—the only Bangladeshi batter with a 40+ average over that period.

The Traveller in a Land of Two-Test Series

There is a peculiar tragedy in Mushfiqur’s career. Had he been Australian, English, or Indian, he might have played 150 or even 180 Tests. Instead, Bangladesh’s limited fixture list forced his career into a series of compressed, under-resourced, two-match tours. Yet, within those constraints, he carved out achievements that rival global greats:

Three Test double-centuries — the most by any wicketkeeper-batter in history.

Hundreds in six countries.

Bangladesh’s highest away average among top-order batters.

Involved in five of the team’s six partnerships exceeding 250 runs.

A balls-per-dismissal ratio of 78.6 — the toughest Bangladeshi batter to dislodge.

He was not merely a participant in Bangladesh’s story; he was the axis around which its Test evolution rotated.

The Human Behind the Legend

The milestone Test brought emotional truths to the surface. In the team huddle before his 100th match, he told his teammates something revealing and profoundly un-Bangladeshi in its humility:

“Mushfiqur Rahim exists because of Bangladesh. I am just a drop in the ocean.”

He dedicated his century in that match—he became only the eleventh cricketer in history to score a hundred in his 100th Test—to his grandparents, who once confessed they wished to live long enough to watch him bat.

These gestures strip away the statistical armour and expose the emotional engine that has powered this journey: gratitude, duty, and a sense of national responsibility that is rare in modern cricket.

A Legacy Beyond the Scorebook

Mushfiqur Rahim is more than the sum of his runs or the longevity of his career. He is the embodiment of Bangladesh’s slow, painful, stubborn rise into Test relevance. He represents an entire generation that learned to endure humiliation, absorb defeat, and still imagine a better cricketing tomorrow.

He is proof that greatness in Bangladesh cricket is not something inherited; it is something engineered.

As he looks ahead to yet another Test series—Pakistan at home next April—he leaves the future deliberately ambiguous. Perhaps he doesn’t need to plan too far. Legends rarely do. Their careers do not end; they taper into memory, into habit, into cultural inheritance.

In a cricket world structured against the small and unfashionable, Mushfiqur Rahim stood only five feet tall but stood tall enough for all of Bangladesh.

And perhaps that is the true meaning of his 100th Test: not a milestone, but a metaphor for a nation that learned—through him—how to stay, resist, and finally belong.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

A Trial by Fire in Multan: Pakistan’s Triumph and Bangladesh’s Reckoning

Setting the Stage

The Multan Cricket Stadium, newly inaugurated as Test cricket’s 81st venue, welcomed Bangladesh with hope and Pakistan with expectation. For Bangladesh, it was a chance to avoid defeat in their fourth Test; for Pakistan, a homecoming wrapped in the fervour of returning Test cricket to Multan after two decades. Yet, by the third morning, the contest had turned into a study in extremes — Pakistan’s dominance illuminating Bangladesh’s frailties. What unfolded was one of the heaviest defeats in Test history, raising sharp questions about the International Cricket Council’s haste in granting Bangladesh Test status.

Bangladesh’s Faltering Beginnings

The visitors’ optimism was short-lived. Skipper Naimur Rahman chose to bat on a surface expected to take turn, but his side’s lack of technique and patience was soon exposed. Within 41.1 overs — barely two sessions — they were dismissed for 134. Coincidence became cruelty when their second innings consumed the same number of overs, though yielding 14 more runs. Habibul Bashar, with a composed 56 not out, alone offered resistance, his effort a solitary beacon in otherwise cavalier batting.

Pakistan’s Batting Masterclass

If Bangladesh’s innings revealed fragility, Pakistan’s response embodied exuberance. They amassed 546 for three declared at a dazzling 4.75 runs an over, striking 82 boundaries in a display that bordered on the theatrical. Saeed Anwar, fluent and destructive, crossed 4,000 Test runs while racing to 101. His partner, the debutant Taufeeq Umar, etched his name in history as Pakistan’s eighth batsman to score a century on debut.

Inzamam-ul-Haq, the local hero, fulfilled a childhood dream with a century in front of his home crowd, though dehydration forced him to retire. From there, Yousuf Youhana and Abdul Razzaq turned the spectacle into a race for glory — both storming to centuries, their unbroken partnership of 165 an exhibition of command. Four of the five centuries were scored in a single day, a statistical feat that elevated the performance into the annals of Test cricket.

The Bowling Symphony: Spin and Pace in Concert

If Pakistan’s batsmen were overwhelmed with artistry, their bowlers dismantled Bangladesh with ruthless efficiency. Danish Kaneria, still in the infancy of his career, spun webs with bounce and guile, taking six wickets in each innings for just 94 runs. Ten dismissals fell to close-in catches, four pouched by Younis Khan, who set a record for a substitute fielder. Waqar Younis contributed with a fiery spell of 4 for 19, while even debutant Shoaib Malik chipped in with two wickets.

Bangladesh’s second innings — beginning with a mountain to climb — collapsed under the twin pressure of Kaneria’s spin and Waqar’s pace. Bashar again fought with dignity, but his defiance was lonely. The team folded for 148, and the inevitable innings-and-264-run defeat was sealed within two and a half days.

 Records and Rarities

This match was not merely lopsided; it was historically significant.

Five Centuries in One Innings: Pakistan’s 546 for three is the lowest total to include five hundreds, eclipsing the West Indies’ 550 with four in 1982–83.

Left-Handed Landmarks: For the first time in Test history, both left-handed openers — Anwar and Taufeeq — scored centuries in the same innings.

Twin Century Partnerships for the Same Wicket: Youhana was central to two unbroken century stands for the fourth wicket, a unique feat.

Centuries on Debut in Successive Tests: Taufeeq Umar’s hundred in Multan was mirrored the very next day in Colombo by Sri Lanka’s T.T. Samaraweera — a quirky coincidence in Test lore.

A Match Shadowed by Tragedy

Yet amid the celebrations, the occasion was darkened by personal grief. Saeed Anwar, whose century had opened the floodgates, learned of the death of his young daughter, Bismah, during the match. His quiet exit from the contest lent the triumph a sombre undertone — a reminder that cricket’s ecstasies are never far from life’s sorrows.

Lessons and Legacies

For Pakistan, the match was both a statement of strength and a glimpse of the future: Kaneria’s rise as a genuine spin threat, Umar’s promising debut, and a batting order overflowing with confidence. For Bangladesh, it was a stark confrontation with reality. Their elevation to Test cricket was intended to accelerate development, but the gulf in skill and temperament suggested a premature leap.

Multan, with its scorching heat and fervent crowds, staged not only a contest but also a metaphor: Pakistan’s cricket blossomed under the sun, while Bangladesh wilted in its glare. The innings defeat, emphatic and historic, was both a celebration of Pakistani brilliance and an urgent call for Bangladesh to rebuild if they were to claim a place among the serious nations of Test cricket.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Of squandered chances and patient triumphs: Bangladesh’s woes and Sri Lanka’s quiet reawakening

Test cricket, perhaps more than any other sport, is a stern tutor. It exposes impatience, magnifies errors, and punishes lapses in discipline with an almost cruel precision. The second Test in Colombo was such a lesson — a canvas on which Bangladesh’s enduring struggles were painted in anxious strokes, even as Sri Lanka quietly sketched out their own reassuring tale of resurgence.

Bangladesh: promise betrayed by impatience and frailty

For Bangladesh, the match began with hope. Winning the toss on a track at the SSC that traditionally flatters batters, they aspired to set the game’s tone. Instead, their innings was a tragic anthology of starts squandered. Six of their batters crossed 20, yet none reached 50. Each seemed to settle just long enough to hint at permanence, only to perish to a reckless stroke or a lapse in judgment. It was not so much that the pitch was hostile — it was that Bangladesh conspired against themselves.

It’s telling that their most substantial partnership, between Mushfiqur Rahim and Litton Das, came with two reprieves handed on a silver platter by Sri Lanka’s fielders. Even then, it was a transient resistance. Bangladesh’s innings was stitched together by the generosity of dropped catches, edges falling tantalisingly short, and missed run-out chances. Yet they could only crawl to 220 for 8 by the close on day one. It felt like a team forever one moment away from collapse — a psychological fragility every bit as costly as technical flaws.

Worse still, Bangladesh compounded these batting frailties with wayward bowling. Aside from Taijul Islam, who turned in a lionhearted five-for, their bowlers too often erred in line or length. When they did build pressure, they failed to sustain it, leaking boundaries that undid spells of good work. In total, they were a side wrestling with their own inconsistency — a problem more chronic than situational.

Sri Lanka: a quiet revolution in temperament

For Sri Lanka, meanwhile, this Test was a portrait of deliberate, almost old-fashioned Test match cricket — a demonstration that control over time remains the game’s most formidable weapon.

Their resurgence is not the stuff of dramatic flair. It is the quiet evolution of a side learning once more how to be methodical. With the ball, they were patient. Despite five dropped catches and missed chances that might have rattled a less disciplined unit, they stuck doggedly to probing lines, trusting that a mistake would eventually arrive. Asitha Fernando and Vishwa Fernando kept hammering the corridor outside off, while debutant Sonal Dinusha bowled with a composure that belied his inexperience. Even Prabath Jayasuriya, wicketless in the first innings, persisted until the surface rewarded him spectacularly in the second.

Their batting was an even richer story. Pathum Nissanka played an innings that was both a masterclass and a metaphor: 158 runs crafted with an unhurried grace that Bangladesh could not emulate. His shot selection was underwritten by a deep assurance; his ability to shift gears — from cautious to imperious — showcased a temperament honed for the long form. Where Bangladesh’s batters seemed forever tempted by risk, Nissanka exuded a calm certainty that allowed the game to bend to his rhythm.

When Bangladesh did apply themselves — as Taijul did with the ball, or briefly when Shadman Islam flirted with a second successive fifty — it only underscored how costly the collective lapses were. They were moments of resistance drowned out by a tide of their own making.

A match decided in moments — and mindsets

In the end, the statistical verdict — an innings-and-78-run victory for Sri Lanka — tells only half the story. The deeper narrative is one of contrasts: Bangladesh’s inability to turn promise into permanence, Sri Lanka’s refusal to panic when catches went down or the scoreboard slowed.

It is also a testament to the timeless truths of Test cricket: that even on a surface with runs to be made, discipline is king; that pressure is not always built by wickets alone but by denying easy runs, by choking off release. Sri Lanka bowled 30 maidens across Bangladesh’s first innings alone, each one a subtle squeeze on the psyche.

Bangladesh, by contrast, often bowled too short or too full, too anxious to force the game rather than let it evolve. Their batting too betrayed this urgency — attacking when they should have consolidated, defending without intent when they needed to score.

Two teams, two journeys

In a way, this match was the crossroads of two trajectories. Sri Lanka are a team quietly rebuilding an identity around patience and process. The likes of Nissanka and Jayasuriya are symbols of this — players who understand that Test victories are accumulated through small moments won again and again across sessions.

Bangladesh remain tantalisingly close yet frustratingly far. They possess the talent: Shanto, Mushfiqur, Litton, Taijul — all capable on their day. But Tests are not won on scattered days. They are won by sustaining standards across days, across innings, across fleeting moments when the game teeters and demands calm. Bangladesh, by dropping catches, playing rash strokes, and squandering bowling pressure, allowed each of those moments to slip away.

The enduring lesson

As Colombo’s sun set on a fourth-day finish, it left behind more than just numbers on a scoresheet. It offered a lesson as old as the format itself: that in Test cricket, unlike any other, impatience extracts a heavy price, while those who are willing to endure, to trust the process over impulse, find themselves rewarded not just with victory but with a growing aura of reliability.

Sri Lanka walk away from this series heartened by the shape their resurgence is taking — a methodical, disciplined, quietly confident side that seems ready to embrace harder challenges ahead. Bangladesh leave with familiar regrets and, hopefully, the resolve to address them. For in the end, cricket rarely forgives repetition of old mistakes. It merely waits to punish them again.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Angelo Mathews: A Farewell to a Cricketer Who Did Everything, Everywhere, All at Once

 A Walk Into History at Galle

On June 21, 2025, under overcast skies and amidst the salty breeze of the Galle Fort, one of Sri Lanka’s last cricketing titans walked off the Test stage for the final time. Angelo Davis Mathews—battered, bruised, and brilliant across 16 years—played his final innings in whites, scoring just 8 off 45 balls. There was no fairy-tale finish. But the emotion was no less overwhelming.

As he departed, a giant cobra-shaped kite soared above the Galle International Stadium—a poetic tribute during kite-flying season. On it, written simply, was his name. "Angelo." No surname needed. Everyone knew who it was for.

Mathews had announced before the match that this would be his last dance in the Test arena. It brought to an end a journey that saw him rise from a precocious all-rounder to a stoic leader and, eventually, a symbol of endurance in a cricketing landscape that often felt uncertain and unstable.

The Making of a Modern Marvel

Mathews’ introduction to the Test arena came in 2009, during a turbulent period of rebuilding. The old guard—Jayawardene, Sangakkara, and Dilshan—was still standing tall, but cracks were appearing. Into this mix walked Mathews, offering something rare: a fast-bowling allrounder, capable of bowling tidy seamers and batting with equal parts flair and grit.

Sri Lanka had never quite produced such a player. His early years were spent learning to adapt to roles as diverse as lower-order rescuer, enforcer, and steady accumulator. By the time he was 25, he was handed the Test and ODI captaincies—an appointment met with scepticism by some but trust by those who saw his growing maturity.

He didn’t disappoint.

2014: An Absolute Purple Patch

Every cricketer has a defining year. For Mathews, it was 2014. It began quietly, with a drawn Test against Pakistan that overlapped the last day of 2013 and spilt into the first week of the new year. But that calm would soon erupt into one of the most remarkable 12-month stretches a Sri Lankan cricketer has ever had.

The Stats:

1160 Test runs at an average of 77.33

Asia Cup title: as captain, delivering match-turning spells and cool-headed finishes.

T20 World Cup win: with Mathews playing a crucial all-round role.

Historic series win in England: anchored by his epic 160 at Headingley.

At Headingley, his innings—under pressure and following a modest first-innings lead—turned the tide. When wickets were falling at the other end, Mathews remained unmoved. He built a 149-run stand with Rangana Herath, pushing Sri Lanka to a 350-run lead, which Prasad and Herath converted into a stunning victory.

This wasn’t just a victory on the scorecard. It was symbolic. It proved that Sri Lanka, even in the post-Jayawardene-Sanga era, could still punch above its weight overseas.

Captain Courageous

Mathews’ captaincy record, at first glance, doesn’t scream greatness. But deeper reflection reveals the scope of his challenge. He captained during the nation’s post-golden generation, a time of financial uncertainty at Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC), constant coaching changes, player revolts, and political interference.

Despite these headwinds, Mathews held the team together. He wasn’t a flashy tactician, but he was instinctive, and more importantly, respected. His leadership reached a crescendo during the 3-0 home whitewash of Australia in 2016, where Sri Lanka’s spinners decimated the opposition and Mathews, as always, contributed across departments.

He may not have screamed or punched the air with every wicket, but his calm, analytical nature gave Sri Lanka breathing room in chaos.

Iconic Performances: A Career in Snapshots

157not out vs Pakistan, Abu Dhabi (2014)

With Sri Lanka trailing by nearly 180, Mathews fought a lone battle, soaking up 343 balls to force a draw—proof of his growing discipline and maturity.

160 vs England, Headingley (2014)

The innings that defined his leadership. With the series on the line, Mathews led from the front and scripted Sri Lanka’s first Test series win in England.

120 not out  vs New Zealand, Wellington (2018)

A statement after being dropped from ODIs over fitness concerns. Along with Kusal Mendis, Mathews batted an entire day and forced a draw through sheer will.

99 vs India (2009) & 199 vs Bangladesh (2022)

The only batter in Test history dismissed on both scores. A cruel symmetry that mirrors a career of near-misses, but also moments of magic.

A Hallmark of Consistency

- 8167 Test runs, 119 matches, 16 centuries, 36 fifties

- Third-highest Test run-getter in Sri Lankan history (after Sangakkara and Jayawardene)

- Scored more than 4000 runs at home, and over 3500 runs abroad—a rare balance in the subcontinent

- Averaged 50+ against Bangladesh, New Zealand, and Pakistan

-  All four Player-of-the-Series awards came away from home

Mathews was Sri Lanka’s most prolific No. 5 and 6 batter between 2013–15, scoring over 2200 runs at an average nearing 58. He was the finisher, the firefighter, and the fulcrum around whom matches spun.

 The Allrounder Who Evolved Beyond Role

As his body gave in and the bowling slowly vanished from his arsenal, Mathews reinvented himself. He became a crisis manager with the bat. Where he once hit sixes to finish games, he began blocking for hours to save them. His unbeaten 120 in Delhi and the push-up celebration after his hundred in Wellington stand as late-career monuments to grit, pride, and understated rebellion.

Angelo Mathews didn’t always get the attention he deserved. He wasn’t always on magazine covers or celebrated like a rockstar. But in dressing rooms across the world, and among teammates from Lasith Malinga to Dhananjaya de Silva, his value was priceless.

A Farewell to the Unshakeable

Mathews ends his Test career not as a firework but a lighthouse—steady, unfazed, illuminating a path forward for a new generation of Sri Lankan cricketers. In a cricketing era increasingly obsessed with instant gratification and flashy strokes, Mathews leaves behind a legacy defined by durability, maturity, and an iron will.

"It wasn't an easy journey – lots of ups and downs," he reflected."But it’s time for the younger players to take the baton and take Sri Lanka forward."

For a man who never made it about himself, that might be the most fitting epitaph of all.

Farewell, Angelo Mathews. You gave it everything. You made it count.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Mushfiqur Rahim: The Relentless Constant in Bangladesh’s Cricketing Story

Coming in with Bangladesh in trouble is nothing new for Mushfiqur Rahim. It’s a role he’s embraced since he was a teenager in 2005 — his boyish face and disarming smile belying the grit beneath, the grit of a cricketer who has spent two decades cushioning the tremors of Bangladesh’s batting collapses like a sponge soaking pressure.

That pressure became familiar long before it became routine.

Rahim arrived at a time of strategic upheaval in Bangladesh cricket. In 2005, the selectors — led by a visionary think tank comprising Dav Whatmore, Steve McInnes, and Arafat Rahman — made an audacious call to build for the future. Out went the old guard, despite the criticism of so-called "paid experts"; in came a clutch of raw, untested youth, among whom Mushfiqur was the cornerstone.

That decision would, with time, prove inspired.

A Productive Partnership 

Fast forward to Galle in 2025. Najmul Hossain Shanto had just faced three deliveries when Mushfiqur walked in at 45 for 3 — a precarious yet familiar scenario. On his sixth ball, Shanto danced down the track and lofted one over the bowler’s head, signalling intent. It wasn’t reckless aggression, but a calm defiance. It was as though the innings had inhaled new air.

Despite a pitch that looked flatter than usual on Day 1, Bangladesh resisted the urge to accelerate. Galle demands respect, not bravado. Bat first, bat long. That has long been the script.

Sri Lanka, buoyed by Angelo Mathews’ farewell and Tharindu Rathnayake’s dream debut (including a double-strike in consecutive overs), might have imagined a different story unfolding. But they hadn’t accounted for Mushfiqur and Shanto’s poise.

The pair weathered the storm, punished loose deliveries, and ran with urgency. By lunch on Day 2, Bangladesh had crossed 400. The duo's partnership had swelled to 247 runs — both unbeaten, Shanto on 136, Mushfiqur on 105.

It was Mushfiqur’s 12th Test century, ending a 14-innings drought. And yet, this was no free ride. Dhananjaya de Silva rotated the field shrewdly. Sri Lanka’s bowlers probed, particularly targeting Mushfiqur’s patience. He survived 23 balls in the nineties before nudging into three figures in the 86th over.

For Shanto, it was a return to rhythm — his first Test ton since November 2023. For Mushfiqur, it was a full-circle moment in Galle, where 12 years ago he etched his name in Bangladesh’s history books with the team’s first Test double-century.

A Career of Two Halves

Rahim’s career has been, in many ways, a study in duality.

He debuted before MS Dhoni, Kevin Pietersen, Michael Hussey, and Alastair Cook. Nearly two decades later, he remains the last man standing from the Class of 2005 in active Test cricket. And yet, he has rarely been named in conversations about the greats of the modern era. That is both a disservice and an inevitability.

The first half of his career was marked by promise without potency — 12 Tests in, he averaged under 20. His first Test hundred came in 2010 against India. The next arrived three years later. By the end of 2015, Rahim’s average had clawed its way to 32.31 — decent, but not dazzling.

And then came the pivot.

2017 marked a seismic shift. In Wellington, alongside Shakib Al Hasan, Rahim stitched together a record-breaking 359-run partnership against a formidable New Zealand attack. His 159 — the highest by an Asian wicketkeeper in a SENA country — heralded a new chapter. From that point on, Rahim transformed into one of the most consistent Test performers of his generation.

Since that Wellington innings, he has amassed 3,410 runs in 47 Tests at an average of 44.86. Only four players globally have scored more at a higher average during this span. Rahim’s numbers have outstripped Virat Kohli (44.43), Usman Khawaja (44.35), and Babar Azam (43.82) in that period — a stunning metric for a man often left out of elite lists.

And yet, perception lags behind reality.

Limited by Circumstance, Not by Skill

Rahim’s ascent has been constrained by the asymmetries of Test cricket. He has played only 14 Tests in SENA countries, averaging 21.92. Six of those came after 2017 — two in New Zealand, where he averaged 94.50, and four in South Africa, where he struggled at 19. No Tests in England or Australia since 2016. Even in Bangladesh, SENA opposition has been sporadic.

That uneven exposure has distorted the perception of Rahim’s quality. The weight given to performances in SENA countries remains the litmus test for batting greatness. And Rahim has had neither the platform nor the privileges to make that case fully.

What he has done is maximize every controllable within his grasp.

Since 2017, his home and away averages are strikingly consistent: 43.93 and 46.15. His centuries span the globe — from Galle to Rawalpindi, Hyderabad to Wellington. At home, he has flourished: three unbeaten scores over 175, including two double centuries. Since 2020, his Test average of 46.42 eclipses Steve Smith’s 46.17 — a quiet, almost ironic, footnote in cricket's statistical archives.

A Legacy Cast in Grit, Not Glamour

Rahim has always been a cricketer's cricketer. Understated. Uncelebrated. Yet unmistakably elite. His skill against spin is matched by few. His glove work may have often taken a back seat to his batting, but it was never unworthy. In hindsight, had he relinquished the gloves earlier, he might have soared higher with the bat. But Rahim chose devotion over convenience.

He has been criticized for wearing his heart on his sleeve — sometimes too tightly. The emotional strain of carrying Bangladesh’s middle order and the added burden of wicketkeeping may have exacted a toll. But that emotional core also fuelled his longevity, his resilience, and his quiet dominance.

Mushfiqur Rahim will perhaps never be counted among the pantheon of global greats. But within the context of Bangladesh cricket — and indeed, the global narrative of undervalued brilliance — he stands tall.

Not every great player makes headlines. Some, like Rahim, make history — quietly, persistently, and with unwavering grace.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

The Day Cricket’s Order Was Upturned: Bangladesh’s Historic Victory Over Australia

There are moments in sports that transcend the mere confines of a match scorecard. They linger in the collective consciousness, etched into the annals of history, revisited with awe and disbelief. Bangladesh’s victory over Australia in Cardiff was one such moment—an event so improbable that it defied every pre-match expectation, rewrote cricketing narratives, and sent shockwaves through the sport’s hierarchy. 

At sunrise, Australia’s dominance was unquestioned. By dusk, they were left picking up the pieces of a humbling they never saw coming. The script was supposed to be routine—another day, another Australian victory. But the beauty of sport lies in its ability to defy certainty. On June 18, 2005, Bangladesh did not merely win a game of cricket; they upended an empire. 

Cracks in the Colossus: Australia’s Missteps

The Australian team that walked onto the field that day was not merely the best in the world—it was a juggernaut, an era-defining force that had crushed opposition with a ruthless efficiency. They had redefined one-day cricket, setting benchmarks that others could only aspire to match. Yet, beneath that impenetrable façade, cracks had begun to emerge, subtle yet significant. 

Their troubles began even before the first ball was bowled. Andrew Symonds, their one-day powerhouse, was mysteriously withdrawn from the playing XI. Initially, it was brushed off as a ‘niggle’ and later as the ‘flu.’ But as the day progressed, whispers of a disciplinary breach surfaced—Symonds had violated team rules, and an internal investigation had been launched. This disruption, minor as it seemed, hinted at an undercurrent of instability in a team that prided itself on unity and professionalism. 

Ricky Ponting, usually a master tactician, made an uncharacteristic misjudgment at the toss. The conditions in Cardiff—a damp pitch under thick cloud cover—screamed for bowling first. Yet, perhaps out of arrogance, or a desire to challenge his own team, Ponting chose to bat. It was a decision steeped in overconfidence, a miscalculation that gifted Bangladesh an early advantage. 

And so, the dominoes began to fall. 

Bangladesh’s Unrelenting Precision

Cricket is often a game of perception. Bangladesh, despite their undeniable talent, had long been viewed through the lens of their past struggles. Many critics dismissed them as perennial underdogs, a team content with participation rather than victory. But within the dressing room, a different mindset was brewing. 

Under the guidance of Dav Whatmore, the team had slowly built a foundation of quiet confidence. Gone were the days of celebrating moral victories; this Bangladesh team had come to Cardiff to win. And from the moment Mashrafe Mortaza ran in to bowl the first over, they played like a team that truly believed. 

Mortaza’s spell was a masterclass in discipline and precision. His first six overs conceded just five runs, an astonishing feat against a side known for aggressive strokeplay. Australia’s openers, usually dominant, were shackled. Adam Gilchrist fell in the opening over, trapped lbw to a Mortaza delivery that jagged back sharply. Ponting, visibly distracted and perhaps unsettled by the off-field drama, soon followed, dismissed by Tapash Baisya for a mere one run. 

Australia’s innings never truly recovered. Damien Martyn scratched his way to a painstaking 77, unable to impose himself. Matthew Hayden, the only batsman who looked capable of changing the script, perished just when he seemed ready to take control. By the time the innings concluded, Australia had managed 249—respectable, but far from the dominance they were accustomed to asserting. 

For Bangladesh, this was their best display of fielding and bowling on the tour by a considerable margin. Mohammad Rafique was cunning and accurate with his left-arm spin, while Aftab Ahmed’s medium pace provided vital control. The energy, the discipline, the sheer refusal to let Australia breathe—this was a Bangladesh side operating at its peak. 

Ashraful’s Masterpiece: A Hundred Against History

There are centuries, and then there are centuries that define a player’s legacy. Mohammad Ashraful’s 100 that day was the latter. It was not just about the runs; it was about defiance, about artistry, about a young man staring down the most fearsome bowling attack in the world and making them look ordinary. 

The start of Bangladesh’s chase was cautious, yet confident. Nafees Iqbal fell early, but there was no panic. Tushar Imran played with positive intent, smashing Brad Hogg for three lofted boundaries before perishing to a spectacular catch by Simon Katich. Javed Omar, known for his patience, provided stability. But it was Ashraful who took centre stage. 

His innings was a breathtaking display of elegant strokeplay. Cover drives flowed effortlessly, flicks to fine leg were executed with casual audacity, and his confidence only grew as the target came within reach. On 54, he was given a lifeline—Jason Gillespie spilt a regulation catch at fine leg. It was the moment Australia had to seize, the turning point they desperately needed. Instead, it became the turning point of the match. 

Ashraful did not look back. He brought up his fifty by flat-batting Glenn McGrath over mid-off, a shot laced with arrogance and flair. He shared a vital 130-run partnership with Habibul Bashar, the Bangladesh captain, who seemed to revel in the moment, finally having something to smile about after years of leading a team in transition. 

The match reached its crescendo when Aftab Ahmed, with audacity befitting the occasion, launched Jason Gillespie into the Cardiff sky for six to level the scores. Moments later, Rafique calmly worked the ball into the outfield, and Bangladesh’s greatest cricketing triumph was complete. 

Beyond the Scorecard: A Nation Transformed

“This is probably one of the biggest upsets in the history of cricket, and my worst defeat as captain,” Ponting admitted after the match. The magnitude of what had transpired was not lost on him. 

But for Bangladesh, this was not merely an upset. It was a statement. It was validation. It was the breaking of chains that had bound them to a narrative of perpetual struggle. 

The celebrations in Dhaka that night were nothing short of euphoric. The streets were alive with jubilant fans, dancing in disbelief, spraying paint on passing cars as if the entire city had become a canvas for their uncontainable joy. Television networks abandoned their schedules to replay the match endlessly. At Mohammad Ashraful’s modest home, a sea of well-wishers gathered, eager to catch a glimpse of their new hero. 

Yet, what was most remarkable was the shift in perception. Just two years earlier, Bangladesh’s greatest achievement might have been playing out 50 overs against a top-tier team. Now, they were beating the world champions. And it was not an accident. It was clinical. It was professional. It was everything that made Australia great, now embodied by a team that had, until then, been overlooked. 

This victory was not just a one-off—it was a glimpse into the future. A future where Bangladesh was no longer a side that the cricketing world pitied, but one that it respected. The cricketing landscape had changed that day, and there was no turning back. 

Australia, the ultimate benchmark, had been conquered. And the cricketing world had been served a warning: never underestimate the raw, unfiltered, and uninhibited talent of Bangladesh. 

The road ahead was long, but the path had been paved. The Tigers had roared, and the echoes would be heard for years to come.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Bangladesh Football: A Reality Check and the Path Forward

After watching two recent matches, my personal observation is that the only noticeable changes in Bangladesh football are the additions of Jamal Bhuyan and Hamza Choudhury. Apart from these two, the overall quality and structure of the game remain largely unchanged. The team still appears sluggish and disjointed. In midfield, Jamal and Hamza are doing most of the heavy lifting, while the rest of the players seem unsure of how to benefit from their presence and abilities.

From a technical perspective, when Singapore noticed that Bangladesh was defending in a mid-block, they shifted to a long-ball approach. Countering long passes typically requires a high defensive line, but Bangladesh failed to adapt. This isn’t just a matter of coaching—it’s also about basic tactical awareness. That failure to adjust could have led to conceding more goals. Recognizing this weakness, Singapore pushed forward and took risks. Bangladesh did have opportunities to counterattack, but unfortunately, those chances were wasted due to poor execution.

In my opinion, Bangladesh should focus on playing as many matches as possible against lower-ranked teams from Europe and Latin America. These games can help build both confidence and technical maturity. This kind of structured, strategic exposure can be the beginning of real progress.

Progress in football does not come from hype or emotion. It requires planning, development, and a realistic understanding of the game.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Black Caps Rising: Ravindra's Brilliance and Bangladesh’s Missed Chance

In a tournament marked by transition, New Zealand have remained steadfast. The Champions Trophy has showcased several teams in flux, but the Black Caps have been a beacon of continuity, signalling that their next generation is more than ready for the grand stage. Just a few years ago, Kane Williamson shouldered the burden of their batting lineup. Now, Rachin Ravindra has stepped forward, eager to claim that responsibility, embodying the spirit of a team that seamlessly blends experience with emerging talent.

Batting at an unfamiliar No. 4 position, Ravindra was thrust into the fray at 15 for 2. He neither hesitated nor faltered, and when he reached his century, it was with the same assuredness and unflappable demeanour that defined his entire innings. His knock not only sealed New Zealand’s place in the semi-finals but also confirmed India’s progression, officially eliminating Pakistan and Bangladesh. His innings was not just about runs; it was a statement, a declaration that he is ready to be a mainstay in the team’s future campaigns.

Bangladesh's Faltering Resolve

For Bangladesh, this was a must-win encounter, yet their approach lacked the urgency the situation demanded. They began fluently, scoring at nearly a run a ball, but then inexplicably drifted into a period of inertia. Ten of the next fifteen overs produced three runs or fewer. This stagnation invited pressure, which ultimately consumed their most experienced players. Mushfiqur Rahim and Mahmudullah, who together have played 511 international matches, managed a combined six runs before their dismissals left Najmul Hossain Shanto stranded in a crumbling structure.

Shanto's 77 off 110 deliveries reflected his predicament—constantly forced to readjust to new partners, recalibrating to ever-shifting match conditions. He could have done better, but the real disappointment lay in those around him, who should have done much more. The inexperience of the middle order, the lack of intent, and poor shot selection painted a picture of a team that seemed unwilling to rise to the occasion.

Ravindra’s Masterclass in Adaptation

For a brief moment, Bangladesh found hope. Taskin Ahmed and Nahid Rana ignited early sparks, dismantling Will Young’s stumps in the first over and dismissing Williamson cheaply. The energy was palpable; the fielders buzzed, and the crowd roared. Then came Ravindra, exuding calm amid the storm.

His touch is exquisite—effortless yet effective. He found gaps rather than forcing shots, relying on his impeccable timing. Introduced into the XI as a replacement for the ill Daryl Mitchell, he began his innings within the fielding restrictions, capitalizing on the gaps with precision. His first five boundaries were a masterclass in placement, each stroke executed with elegance and intent. His adaptability in reading the conditions and adjusting his approach showcased a maturity beyond his years.

As the field spread, Ravindra adjusted, transitioning seamlessly from aggression to control. His first 23 runs came at a brisk 21-ball pace, his next 28 from 29 deliveries. A brief moment of peril surfaced in the 12th over—a mix-up with Devon Conway nearly saw him run out, but Tanzid Hasan missed the direct hit. Bangladesh had an opportunity but let it slip. New Zealand, in contrast, did not miss theirs.

The Art of Execution

New Zealand’s excellence lay in execution. Williamson was instrumental in the field, pouching crucial catches at short midwicket and cover. Michael Bracewell, the unheralded hero, delivered a spell of precision—4 for 26 in an uninterrupted 10-over stint. His spell not only dismantled Bangladesh’s lineup but also exposed their fundamental flaw: an inability to rotate strike. His ability to slow down the pace, extract turn, and build pressure was a lesson in disciplined spin bowling.

Bangladesh’s innings was marred by 178 dot balls, with Bracewell alone accounting for 43 of them. Their struggles harked back to a bygone era—2012 was the last time they had batted with such anaemic intent in a 50-over match. Their approach to breaking the shackles was ill-conceived. Mushfiqur miscalculated a slog-sweep, failing to clear the long boundary. Mahmudullah, instead of consolidating, embarked on a reckless charge down the track, skying a leading edge to cover. Their tactics, or the lack thereof, showcased a team struggling to find a balance between aggression and responsibility.

The Difference Between Champions and Contenders

New Zealand showcased a level of control Bangladesh simply could not match. Even as the pitch improved under lights, the Black Caps maintained discipline. A telling moment arrived in the 40th over—New Zealand stationed only three boundary riders when five were permitted. They had Bangladesh pinned, mentally and tactically, dictating every aspect of the game.

By the time Bangladesh's innings concluded, it was a study in regret. The late movement under lights, the sharp turn, the low bounce, the direct-hit run-out—everything pointed to what could have been had they reached a competitive total. The missed run-out chance on Ravindra when he was 25 loomed large. A target of 260 might have made all the difference.

But in the end, New Zealand knew the formula: partnerships. Ravindra forged a crucial 57-run stand with Conway, followed by a defining 129-run alliance with Tom Latham—New Zealand’s crisis manager extraordinaire. Latham possesses the temperament of a man who, in a post-apocalyptic world, would quietly assume the role of the protagonist’s trusted advisor. His calculated approach, ability to assess situations, and execution of plans make him indispensable in the middle order.

First, though, there’s an ICC trophy at stake, and New Zealand have made it clear—they mean business. With a well-oiled machine, a new generation stepping up, and a hunger that remains undiminished, the Black Caps are on a mission. The semi-finals await, and if their performances thus far are any indication, New Zealand are far from done.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar  

A Tactical Encounter in Dubai: India vs Bangladesh in the ICC Champions Trophy 2025

The ICC Champions Trophy 2025 match between India and Bangladesh was expected to be a routine victory for the Men in Blue. However, played in Dubai rather than the cricketing hotbeds of Lahore or Karachi, the usual fervor of an India match was noticeably subdued. Unlike the electrifying reception they might have received in Pakistan, the Indian team played in front of a relatively quiet and scattered crowd, making for an unusual setting for a high-stakes tournament game.

Bangladesh’s Fightback on a Tough Pitch

The slow, low deck in Dubai made run-scoring a laborious task for both teams. Bangladesh’s young brigade, despite their inexperience, showed great resilience in posting a competitive total. Their batting lineup initially crumbled under pressure, slipping to 35 for 5 due to some rash shot selection and disciplined Indian bowling. However, a remarkable century from Towhid Hridoy, aided by some crucial dropped catches by India, gave Bangladesh a lifeline. The middle and lower-order fightback ensured that they posted a total of 229, which proved tricky for India to chase.

Shami’s Brilliance and India’s Missed Opportunities

Mohammed Shami was the architect of Bangladesh’s early collapse, claiming his sixth ODI five-wicket haul and becoming the quickest bowler to reach 200 ODI wickets in terms of balls bowled. His incisive bowling left Bangladesh reeling, but lapses in fielding allowed the opposition to recover. Axar Patel, too, played a significant role, claiming crucial wickets and nearly securing a hat-trick. However, dropped catches—particularly by Rohit Sharma and KL Rahul—allowed Bangladesh to gain momentum.

India’s Chase: A Struggle for Stability

India’s pursuit of 229 started assuredly, with Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill laying a solid foundation with a 69-run opening stand. Rohit played aggressively, scoring a quickfire 41 off 36 balls before falling while trying to capitalize on the powerplay. His departure marked a turning point, as India’s innings slowed down considerably.

A Battle Against Spin and Conditions

Virat Kohli, India’s mainstay, once again fell to a legspinner, this time Rishad Hossain, who deceived him with a well-disguised delivery. Shreyas Iyer tried to settle in but perished while attempting to accelerate. Axar Patel, promoted in the batting order, failed to read a topspinner and was dismissed cheaply. With the wickets of key batters falling at regular intervals, India’s chase became a test of patience and adaptability.

Shubman Gill: The Anchoring Role

Amidst the struggles, Shubman Gill emerged as the saviour for India. Unlike his usual flamboyant style, Gill adjusted to the sluggish nature of the pitch, crafting his slowest ODI century and the slowest by an Indian in six years. After Rohit’s dismissal, he curbed his attacking instincts, relying on singles and rotating the strike efficiently. He took 52 balls to score his next 30 runs, waiting for the right moments to accelerate.

The Final Surge: India Seals the Victory

As the match neared its conclusion, Gill finally shifted gears, targeting the returning Tanzim Hasan. He reached his century with a six and a four, finishing with 125 balls to his name. KL Rahul, who had earlier survived a dropped chance, provided the finishing touch, striking a six off Tanzim to take India home with 21 balls to spare.

Lessons from the Contest

Both teams walked away with key learnings from this gripping contest. Bangladesh will rue their missed chances—both in the field and with their early batting collapse—but will take heart from the resilience shown by their middle order. India, on the other hand, will view this victory as a test passed under difficult conditions, but they will be wary of their vulnerability on slow pitches, something that haunted them in Sri Lanka previously.

In the end, it was a tactical battle where Shami’s brilliance, Bangladesh’s fighting spirit, and Gill’s patience combined to produce a contest that was far from a foregone conclusion.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Reclaiming Glory Amid Shadows: Bangladesh's Resilience in the Caribbean

In July 2009, the Bangladesh cricket team scripted history in the West Indies, breaking a 15-year drought by securing their first-ever Test victory in the Caribbean. Though the opposition was a shadow of its full strength due to a players' protest, the triumph resonated deeply within a cricketing nation often chided for its struggles in the longest format. Celebrations erupted across Bangladesh, not merely for the victory but for what it symbolized—a light piercing through years of criticism and ridicule.

Fifteen years later, the echoes of triumph are subdued. The Tigers have emerged victorious once again in the Caribbean, leveling the series after an emphatic comeback in the second Test. Unlike 2009, this victory came against a West Indies team that showcased its premier players. Yet, the celebrations remain muted. The fans, once brimming with adulation, now look on with ambivalence. Cricket, once the heart of national pride, seems lost in a quagmire of disillusionment, its emotional pull dimmed by political exploitation and a perceived erosion of the players’ dignity.

The Shift in Perception

Bangladesh’s cricketing heroes—once revered as symbols of resilience—are no longer infallible in the eyes of their supporters. The sport, critics argue, has been wielded as a tool by the ruling regime, overshadowing the purity of the game. The actions of some star players have further alienated fans, who demand not just performances on the field but also integrity and accountability off it.

Against this backdrop, the victory in the Caribbean feels like an isolated achievement rather than a transformative moment. However, there are signs of renewal within the team, a flicker of resolve to overcome the weight of inconsistency and a growing appetite for sustained excellence.

A Test of Resolve

The Antigua debacle in the first Test—where Bangladesh was dismantled by an unrelenting West Indies attack—seemed a harbinger of yet another series loss. Yet, the visitors rallied spectacularly in the second Test, propelled by individual brilliance and collective determination.

Nahid Rana’s deceptive pace and metronomic accuracy were pivotal, his maiden five-wicket haul in the first innings dismantling the hosts for 146. Taijul Islam, the team’s dependable left-arm spinner, continued his mastery, claiming his 15th five-wicket haul to restrict the West Indies to 185 in the fourth innings. Taskin Ahmed and Hasan Mahmud added vital contributions, highlighting the depth of Bangladesh’s bowling arsenal.

With the ball setting the stage, the batsmen answered the call. Jaker Ali’s counter-attacking 91, laced with five sixes and eight boundaries, epitomized defiance. His 62 runs in a single session on the fourth morning swung momentum decisively in Bangladesh’s favor, silencing the charged West Indies attack led by the fiery Jayden Seales.

The victory, achieved in adversity, was Bangladesh’s third away win in 2024—a record for the team in a calendar year. It also marked a rare moment of catharsis for a side that had endured five consecutive Test losses leading up to this series.

The Way Forward

Despite the significance of the win, the celebration is tinged with restraint. Fans demand more than fleeting moments of glory; they yearn for a team that consistently competes with dignity and earns respect on and off the field. For Bangladesh cricket to regain its lost stature, this victory must be a building block rather than an exception.

The players, perhaps now more than ever, seem attuned to this reality. The discipline displayed in their bowling, the grit in their batting, and the strategic nous in their approach suggest a team seeking redemption. But consistency remains the ultimate measure of their revival.

As the Tigers return home, the challenge before them is not merely to win matches but to rekindle the passion of their disenchanted supporters. This victory in the Caribbean—etched in the records as a testament to their resilience—must be the spark that reignites a nation’s faith in its cricketing heroes.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

The Turbulent Tenure of Chandika Hathurusingha: A Coach Caught Between Transformation and Turmoil

Chandika Hathurusingha’s return as head coach of Bangladesh cricket marked a complex chapter in the nation’s sporting history. His reappointment in 2023 was not merely a coaching change - it was a bold, albeit controversial, attempt to restore discipline and structure to a team oscillating between promise and inconsistency. Predictably, his second tenure became a battlefield of ambition, resistance, and volatility, encapsulating the larger tensions within Bangladesh cricket.

Hathurusingha's arrival was met with polarized reactions. While some saw his return as a necessary correction toward professionalism, others feared the rigidity of his methods. The sports media, often entangled with the interests of certain players and officials, quickly turned hostile. In some quarters, he was portrayed as an outsider disrupting the comfort of familiar hierarchies. Yet, undeterred by the noise, Hathurusingha remained committed to his coaching philosophy: an unyielding focus on tactical discipline and the nurturing of young talent.

Tactical Brilliance and Development of Talent

Under Hathurusingha’s guidance, Bangladesh witnessed some memorable performances, particularly in the Test format. The triumphs against New Zealand at home and a historic series win in Pakistan were not mere victories but statements of intent. These results hinted at a transformation - a team gradually learning to thrive in the rigours of red-ball cricket.

A hallmark of his coaching was the development of Bangladesh’s pace attack, mirroring his earlier tenure’s successes. Young bowlers flourished, reflecting his emphasis on strategic planning and mental resilience. Equally noteworthy was the emergence of Najmul Hossain as a captain—an achievement that underscored Hathurusingha’s knack for identifying and moulding leadership from within. His tenure was, in many ways, about future-proofing Bangladesh cricket, preparing it for challenges beyond the present.

Internal Frictions and Media Manipulations

However, success did not come without friction. Hathurusingha’s strict, structured style often collided with the autonomy some senior players had grown accustomed to. Behind the scenes, familiar power struggles resurfaced, with players and officials using media platforms to undermine his authority. The selection process became a flashpoint for disagreements, exposing rifts that went beyond cricketing strategies and into questions of influence and control.

The empowerment of key figures like Shakib Al Hasan - who simultaneously held political office - further complicated team dynamics. Balancing individual ambitions with collective goals became a task fraught with tension. At times, the team appeared caught in a tug-of-war between professionalism and personal agendas, a struggle that left its mark on performances during marquee tournaments such as the Asia Cup and the ICC World Cup. These competitions revealed the limits of Hathurusingha’s impact, as Bangladesh faltered on the biggest stages despite glimpses of brilliance in bilateral series.

The Duality of Success and Struggle

Hathurusingha’s tenure was a paradox—one of short-term success intertwined with deep-seated challenges. While his efforts brought moments of pride, they also exposed the structural fragilities of the team. His attempt to blend seasoned veterans with rising stars was a delicate balancing act that did not always yield the desired consistency. The volatility of Bangladesh cricket—both on and off the field - meant that even the best-laid plans were often derailed by distractions beyond his control.

A Legacy of Lessons, Not Regrets

In retrospect, Hathurusingha’s second stint in Bangladesh cricket was less about trophies and more about transitions. His methods may have seemed abrasive to some, but they reflected a vision that sought long-term growth, not quick fixes. The turbulence that accompanied his tenure underscored the challenges of leading a team where tradition and transformation frequently clash.

Whether or not Hathurusingha ever returns to Bangladesh, his impact will endure in the conversations he leaves behind. He pushed boundaries, reshaped perspectives, and made choices that forced both his supporters and critics to reconsider the trajectory of Bangladesh cricket. His tenure serves as a mirror for the board, the players, and the fans - raising essential questions about leadership, player-coach dynamics, and the team’s readiness to evolve.

Ultimately, Hathurusingha’s legacy will not be defined solely by wins and losses. It will be measured by the lessons learned in navigating ambition, friction, and transformation - lessons that, if heeded, could shape the future of Bangladesh cricket far beyond his departure. And in time, those who once opposed him may speak of him differently, not as a disruptor, but as a coach who dared to chart a new course in a stormy sea.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Shakib Al Hasan betrayed Bangladesh and doesn't deserve apology

Shakib Al Hasan, revered as one of the greatest cricketers in Bangladesh's history, stands at a crossroads of sport and politics, his recent support for Sheikh Hasina's government igniting a firestorm of debate. While his accomplishments on the cricket field are undeniable, his political endorsement raises critical questions about accountability, integrity, and the responsibilities of public figures in a democratic society.

In the arena of sport, athletes often serve as symbols of hope, resilience, and unity for their nations. They transcend boundaries and inspire millions. However, this pedestal comes with a weighty responsibility; it is not enough to merely excel in one’s craft. Public figures must navigate the complex terrain of morality, particularly when their voices carry the potential to influence societal norms and political landscapes.

By openly supporting Sheikh Hasina, a leader accused of authoritarianism, fascism and genocide during the Monsoon Revolution in Bangladesh, Shakib aligns himself with a regime that has systematically undermined the very democratic values that many in Bangladesh hold dear.

The Hasina administration has faced international scrutiny for its harsh crackdowns on dissent, arbitrary arrests of political opponents, and curtailment of press freedoms. In doing so, it has fostered an atmosphere of fear and repression, standing in stark contrast to the principles of democracy, justice, and human rights.

Shakib's decision to stand by such a government is not merely a personal choice; it is a political statement that resonates beyond the cricket field. It sends a message that the pursuit of personal gain or popularity can eclipse the obligation to advocate for justice and accountability. In this light, one must ponder the implications of his actions. Should talent and fame provide immunity from scrutiny when they are inextricably linked to a regime that oppresses its people? 

The answer, emphatically, is no.

Respect is not an entitlement; it must be earned and maintained. Shakib's association with an authoritarian regime casts a long shadow over his legacy. By choosing to support Hasina, he has diminished the respect he garnered through years of dedication to cricket and has risked alienating the very people who once idolized him. In a time when voices of dissent are crucial for the health of democracy, aligning with oppression is a grave misstep.

Furthermore, the ramifications of Shakib’s choices extend beyond the immediate context. They serve as a reflection of the broader societal struggle within Bangladesh - a struggle between the forces of democracy and those of authoritarianism. 

It forces us to confront uncomfortable truths about the moral responsibilities of those who wield influence. In a country where the fight for democratic rights is ongoing, the silence or complicity of public figures can significantly impact public perception and political discourse.

In conclusion, Shakib Al Hasan's support for Sheikh Hasina should not go unchallenged. As a prominent figure, he bears a responsibility to his people that transcend the boundaries of sport. 

Apologies and respect cannot be granted blindly; they must be contingent upon the values one upholds. 

Shakib's alignment with a regime that undermines democracy calls for critical reflection and accountability. In the end, true heroes do not merely excel in their fields; they stand firm against oppression, champion justice, and inspire future generations to do the same.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Navigating Challenges: Bangladesh’s Disappointing Batting Collapse in Kanpur

Bangladesh's batting performance unfolded like a vessel capsizing in a river with a gentle current—devoid of ferocious waves, yet lacking the necessary navigation to reach the safety of the shore. The conditions at Kanpur were not particularly hostile; the ball occasionally kept low and sometimes deviated from a good length, but this was not an insurmountable challenge for a Test batting unit capable of weathering three sessions.

The truth remains that Bangladesh batted poorly, a reality that cannot be obscured. Their one promising innings provided a fleeting glimmer of hope, suggesting that survival might be within reach. However, this brief moment of sensibility was not enough to stem the tide of disappointment that followed.

The crux of the issue lay in the Bangladeshi batsmen's early commitment to aggressive shots, which betrayed a lack of trust in their defensive capabilities. This impulsiveness, coupled with inadequate foot movement, rendered them vulnerable to the subtle variations of the pitch. The result was a disheartening collapse—a performance that seemed all the more disgraceful given the interruptions from inclement weather that plagued the match for nearly three days.

In the end, this innings served as a stark reminder of the importance of patience and adaptability in Test cricket. The ability to read the conditions and adjust one's game accordingly is vital, and in this instance, Bangladesh's failure to do so cost them dearly. The lessons from Kanpur will resonate far beyond this match, highlighting the need for a more strategic approach to future challenges.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Mominul Haque's Masterclass: A Century of Tactical Brilliance in Kanpur

Mominul Haque's remarkable century at Kanpur showcased not only his technical prowess but also his astute tactical acumen. With a strike rate of 57, he maintained a steady tempo throughout his innings, deftly navigating the challenges posed by India's spin duo, Ravindra Jadeja and Ravichandran Ashwin.

Central to Mominul's strategy was his adept use of the sweep shot, which yielded him 23 runs off Ashwin and 21 off Jadeja. This shot allowed him to target the on-side regions, an essential tactic given the disciplined lines the spinners bowled. By focusing on mid-wicket, deep square leg, square leg, and long leg, he effectively capitalized on the scoring opportunities that emerged from their deliveries. Notably, only a single shot against Jadeja ventured to long-off, illustrating his calculated approach to shot selection.

Against the pace of Jasprit Bumrah, Mominul was more cautious, accumulating just 10 runs primarily through third man and cover. In contrast, he found greater success against Mohammed Siraj, where he skillfully crafted 20 runs on the on-side, utilizing his footwork to position himself effectively.

When faced with Akash Deep, Mominul demonstrated his command over the offside, amassing 28 runs through deft strokes to third man, cover, and backward point. This adaptability further underscored his ability to identify and exploit his strong scoring areas.

In the grand tapestry of Test cricket, every innings is a meticulous construction, demanding a batsman to be both self-aware and strategic. Mominul Haque exemplified this principle, building his innings on thoughtful decision-making and a keen understanding of the conditions. His performance stands as a testament to the blend of skill and intelligence that defines successful Test batting.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Grit and Determination: Bangladesh’s Journey Through Political Strife and Sporting Triumph

In the pursuit of success, few qualities resonate as universally as grit and determination. These attributes, often intertwined, form the bedrock of human achievement across various domains, be it sports, business, academia, or personal endeavours. Grit and determination empower individuals to overcome obstacles, push beyond perceived limits, and attain goals that once appeared unattainable.

Grit embodies the ability to maintain focus and sustained effort over time, regardless of the challenges encountered. It is the force that compels an athlete to train through injury, a student to study late into the night, or an entrepreneur to persist in launching a business despite repeated setbacks. This relentless pursuit, fueled by resilience, creates a framework for long-term success.

Determination, on the other hand, serves as the driving force behind an individual’s journey. It encompasses the internal resolve to keep moving forward in the face of overwhelming odds. This mental and emotional fortitude is what prevents one from capitulating, regardless of how daunting the challenge may seem. Often, determination is ignited by a profound sense of purpose or a deep belief in the significance of the goal, motivating individuals to rise after each fall and learn from their mistakes.

In Bangladesh, the recent Quota Reform Movement—evolving into a campaign against the autocratic regime of Sheikh Hasina—has vividly illustrated the power of grit and determination. As the regime shed the blood of innocents and declared its invincibility, the democratic forces rallied with unwavering resolve, ultimately leading to a quest for freedom. The success of this movement is poised to reshape the political landscape, serving as an inspiration for a broader demand for transparency and accountability throughout the nation. The mass protests of July and early August are likely to be etched in history as a pivotal moment in Bangladesh’s pursuit of a just and equitable society.

Amidst this political activism, 2024 also witnessed a landmark achievement in sports, as Bangladesh secured a Test series victory against Pakistan. This triumph not only underscored the nation’s burgeoning prowess in cricket but also held profound cultural and emotional significance. The series epitomized the grit and determination of the Tigers, who, in both Tests, rallied from precarious positions to assert dominance over their opponents. Under pressure, Bangladesh displayed an indomitable spirit, exemplifying their refusal to concede defeat.

The victory against a historically formidable cricketing nation like Pakistan marked a significant milestone in Bangladesh’s evolution as a competitive force in the sport. The series highlighted the maturity and skill development of the Bangladeshi team, which has steadily improved over the years. Renowned for producing high-quality fast bowlers, Pakistan faced a challenging matchup as Bangladesh countered with their own pace attack, characterized by sheer discipline and aggression.

Emerging players like Nahid Rana have captured attention, and his development must be nurtured carefully to ensure that the shorter formats do not disrupt his momentum. Hasan Mahmud, too, has shown commendable progress, mastering the nuances of line and length.

Furthermore, the Bangladeshi batsmen displayed remarkable resilience under pressure, transforming it into a catalyst for performance rather than a source of surrender. Their cultured approach to batting, blending resolve with technical efficiency, was pivotal in turning the tide against Pakistan.

Credit is also due to Najmul Hossain Shanto’s captaincy and Chandika Hathurusingha’s coaching, both of whom successfully balanced the tumultuous off-field environment with on-field performance. Under Hathurusingha’s guidance during his second tenure since 2023, Bangladesh has achieved a remarkable win percentage of 62.5 in Test cricket, scoring at an impressive rate of 3.72 runs per over. The pace attack has thrived with a strike rate of 43 and an economy of 3.35, alongside an average of 27 on flat pitches—an indication of significant improvement.

In a nation grappling with the upheaval wrought by the fascist regime, alongside the psychological toll of recent flash floods, the cricket team’s ability to focus and deliver joy to the people was no small feat. The determination to uplift a country that gained its independence amidst such turmoil reflects a profound commitment to not just sport, but to national pride and unity.

In this backdrop of resilience and hope, the events of July 36 and July 65 resonate deeply, marking a journey toward a brighter future.

Thank you, 

Faisal Caesar

 

Litton Kumer Das: Battling Adversity and Resurrecting Bangladesh's Innings with Grit

Batting under pressure has become a familiar battleground for Litton Kumer Das, and his latest outing was no exception. As he strode to the crease against Pakistan, Bangladesh found themselves in dire straits, mirroring past challenges he faced—most notably three years ago in Chattogram, where he entered at 49 for 4, and again a year later in Mirpur against Sri Lanka at 24 for 5. On both occasions, Litton responded with hundreds, and the circumstances at Rawalpindi demanded nothing less.

The Pakistani pace attack, led by Khurram Shahzad and Mir Hamza, unleashed a relentless assault, wreaking havoc on the Bangladeshi batting order. In a mere 34 balls during the first hour of Day 3, they struck six times, showcasing their ability to swing the ball while maintaining a disciplined line. Hamza exerted the pressure, while Shahzad capitalized, particularly targeting the left-handers with precision and discipline.

With Bangladesh teetering at 26 for 6—threatening to register their lowest total in Test cricket—the situation was dire. The fundamentals of Test cricket dictate that when the ball is new and moving, the first hour belongs to the bowlers. Litton and in-form Mehidy Hasan Miraz knew they had to weather the storm, allowing the shine to fade, as the current Pakistani bowlers lacked the finesse to exploit an older ball.

Post-lunch, Litton began to assert his presence, attacking Shahzad with vigour. He dispatched the bowler for two boundaries in three balls and followed up with three more in the next over, igniting Bangladesh's recovery. In the first six overs after lunch, the team amassed 40 runs, signalling a shift in momentum.

Together, Litton and Mehidy orchestrated a remarkable partnership, adding 165 runs for the seventh wicket and pulling Bangladesh from the brink of disaster. Their fight continued into the final session; resuming at 193 for 8 after tea, Litton and Mahmud made the Pakistani bowlers toil for over two hours. Litton, exhibiting shrewdness, farmed the strike, often denying singles to give Mahmud only a handful of balls. This strategy allowed Litton to reach his century with a deft dab to backward point, overcoming cramps that threatened his performance.

Litton's innings can be likened to an adventure reminiscent of Harrison Ford in Indiana Jones—an interplay of attack and counter-attack that defied the odds without succumbing to haste. Naturally adept at playing off the back foot, Litton skillfully exploited the vacant third-man area by pivoting quickly and executing late cuts with finesse. When the ball was pitched in the middle and off, he showcased nimble footwork, crafting straight drives and creating space for offside strokes. Anything aimed at his pads was dispatched to midwicket, showcasing his range and intent.

Despite Pakistan's attempts to manipulate the field, their strategy backfired; Litton’s ability to rotate the strike kept their bowlers off balance, preventing them from settling into a rhythm. His pull and hook shots against the short deliveries drained the energy from the Pakistani attack. In that zone of confidence, Litton felt invincible, commanding the game with an assurance that suggested nothing could thwart his mission to save Bangladesh.

Ultimately, Bangladesh concluded their innings trailing by a mere 12 runs—a margin that could have been far more daunting had Litton not channelled the adventurous spirit of Indiana Jones within him. His performance was not just a display of skill; it was a testament to resilience and the power of grit in the face of adversity.

Thank you, 

Faisal Caesar

 

 

Bangladesh Triumphs in Rawalpindi: A Historic Win Amid Political Turmoil and Tragedy

The political landscape in Bangladesh has rarely resembled a calm river, especially over the past 15 years under a repressive regime. Protests and chaos have become almost normative, with student demands—such as those surrounding the controversial quota system—often dismissed as fleeting moments. However, the situation escalated violently following inflammatory remarks from former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, revealing the deep-seated tensions within the country.

Under Hasina’s directives, law enforcement and factions of the Awami League pointed weapons at peaceful protesters, leading to horrific bloodshed that did not even spare a four-year-old child. The violence persisted until early August when the Bangladesh Army intervened in a bid for peace. Ultimately, Hasina fled to India, and on August 5, 2024, Bangladeshis took to the streets, celebrating their newfound independence after a prolonged period of oppression.

Tragically, reports indicate that between July 16 and August 16, 2024, 624 lives were lost—354 before Hasina’s resignation, with 66 of the deceased being children. A United Nations investigation later confirmed that at least 650 people had been killed, with over 20,000 injured and more than 11,000 arrested across the nation. The gruesome imagery shared on social media after a seven-day internet blackout left the populace stunned, exposing the brutal reality of Hasina’s regime. The names of martyrs—Abu Sayed, Mir Mugdho, Shaykh Ashhabul Yamin, and others—became synonymous with the struggle against tyranny.

While some Awami League supporters remained silent amidst the massacre, a larger segment joined the student-led movement, ultimately propelling the quest for freedom forward. The struggle for democracy has never been easy in Bangladesh, especially with fascist elements attempting counter-revolutions and external supporters rallying behind the oppressive regime. Compounding the nation’s struggles, a devastating flash flood struck, triggered by the opening of the Damburu Dam in Tripura.

Against this chaotic backdrop, the Bangladesh Cricket Team embarked on a bilateral series in Pakistan. The nation, preoccupied with aiding flood victims, paid little heed to the cricketing spectacle. Yet, amid turmoil, the team displayed remarkable resilience. On Day 1, after a delayed start due to wet conditions, the Bangladeshi bowlers initially had the Pakistani batsmen on the ropes. However, the home side eventually countered, declaring their innings with a strong performance.

By Day 3, Shadman Islam’s patient 93 laid the groundwork, supported by half-centuries from Mominul Haque, Mushfiqur Rahim, and Litton Das. Bangladesh entered the final stretch at 132 runs adrift of Pakistan’s first innings total, with Mushfiqur and Litton forming a crucial partnership. On Day 4, Mushfiqur’s masterful 191 shifted the momentum, showcasing a blend of caution and aggression that was essential for a team still recovering from the July atrocities.

The pitch at Rawalpindi, predictably flat, suggested a dull draw. Yet the Bangladeshi pacers, along with spinners Mehidy Hasan Miraz and the controversial Shakib Al Hasan—who faced scrutiny for his past political affiliations—turned the tables against the odds. Hasan Mahmud applied relentless pressure, while Nahid Rana’s express pace jolted the Pakistani lineup. Shakib and Miraz exploited the conditions expertly, with the spinners posting remarkable figures: Mehidy claimed 5 for 101, and Shakib took 4 for 144.

In a historic turn of events, Bangladesh bowled Pakistan out cheaply, requiring just 30 runs for a momentous victory. Zakir Hasan and Shadman Islam sealed the win, with Zakir striking the winning runs, making history as Pakistan faced a ten-wicket defeat at home in a Test match for the first time.

In a poignant gesture, Bangladesh skipper Najmul Hossain dedicated the victory to the martyrs of the July Massacre. Before the Test, he expressed confidence, stating, “Records can change. It won't be easy for Pakistan. We have a balanced side. We believe we can do special things this time.” Indeed, the records shifted as the Bangladeshi flag soared high in Rawalpindi, symbolizing a nation's resilience.

Focusing on cricket amid such turmoil was a monumental challenge, yet the Tigers channelled their adversities into motivation, determined to uplift a nation still grappling with the aftermath of political upheaval and natural disasters. This victory was not merely a sporting triumph; it represented a collective sigh of relief, a moment of hope, and a reaffirmation of the spirit of a nation that had endured much but refused to be subdued.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar