Bangladesh: A Nation Addicted to Drama — and a Prime Minister Who Must Fix It All

Bangladesh never runs short of spectacle. Every sunrise brings a new headline, every sunset a fresh controversy — and at the center of resolution, predictably, stands Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina.

It’s as if every official, every institution, and every board thrives in chaos just to summon the Prime Minister as the grand problem-solver. From politics to sports, the pattern remains painfully familiar: dysfunction below, decree above.

Cricket — The Nation’s Favorite Soap Opera

For more than a decade, cricket has been Bangladesh’s most reliable source of distraction. What once united a nation has now turned into a stage for ego, melodrama, and cheap theatrics, a space where professionalism routinely bows before personal grudges and political patronage.

And this time, the lead actor of the ongoing spectacle: Tamim Iqbal.

Tamim’s Tears and Hasina’s “Resolution”

Barely three months before the World Cup, Tamim — the country’s most recognizable opener of the last 16 years — announced an abrupt retirement, breaking down in tears before cameras in Chattogram.

His timing was as dramatic as his delivery: the announcement came a day after Bangladesh’s meek defeat to Afghanistan. The press devoured it. Talk shows dissected it. Social media ignited.

Then, like every other Bangladeshi saga, came the inevitable twist.

The next day, Tamim reversed his decision after a three-hour meeting with none other than Sheikh Hasina herself.

Yes, the Prime Minister — the supposed non-political force — once again became the crisis manager of a cricketing issue. And, of course, Mashrafe Bin Mortaza was there too — because every Bangladeshi drama needs its loyal chorus.

So, what was once a sporting question of form, fitness, and discipline became another episode of “Hasina saves the day.”

Politics in the Pavilion

The Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) is often described as “autonomous.” But when the Prime Minister has to mediate between the board president, the captain, and a retired fast bowler-turned-MP, one must ask — what autonomy?

Is Sheikh Hasina non-political? Is Mortaza non-political? 

Of course not.

Their presence turns every cricketing decision into a political statement. It blurs the line between governance and showmanship — and in Bangladesh, that line is long gone.

Tamim’s Decline and the Blame Game

Let’s return to the cricket. Tamim’s back problems were no secret. His fitness had visibly declined; his discipline often questioned. Yet, when he admitted before the first ODI against Afghanistan that he was “not 100% fit,” BCB president Nazmul Hassan exploded — not privately, but publicly, in Protidiner Bangladesh.

That single outburst spiraled into national chaos. Tamim, cornered by criticism, poor form, and perhaps a wounded ego, quit. But a night later, after the political summoning, he un-quit.

It wasn’t the coach, the medical team, or the board who resolved it — it was Hasina.

This is not administration. It’s a theatre. And everyone’s playing their part.

The Numbers Don’t Lie — But Nobody Cares

Beyond the melodrama, Bangladesh’s cricketing problems are painfully measurable.

Since 2019, the Powerplay statistics are bleak:

Strike rate: 68.95

Average: 30.09 (from 49 innings)

Total runs: 2257

Wickets lost: 75

The top teams use the Powerplay to dominate. Bangladesh uses it to survive.

Yet instead of addressing batting intent, fitness culture, or team strategy, the national conversation orbits around egos and reconciliations.

It’s easier to host tea at Ganabhaban than to overhaul cricketing logic.

The Real Tragedy

Tamim’s saga is not about one man’s pain; it’s a reflection of an ecosystem addicted to dysfunction.

The players behave like celebrities, the board like politicians, and the politicians like cricket experts.

When a country’s Prime Minister must personally mediate a captain’s retirement, the problem is no longer in the dressing room; it’s systemic.

Bangladesh doesn’t need more emotion. It needs accountability.

Because until cricket and governance are freed from political theatre, every problem will demand the same tired ending: “Hasina has solved it.”

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

The Unending Coach Hunt: A reflection on Bangladesh Cricket’s systemic flaws

When Gary Kirsten, former South African cricketer and accomplished coach, landed in Dhaka, hopes soared within the cricketing circles of Bangladesh. There was a sense that Kirsten’s presence would herald a shift in the Tigers’ fortunes—perhaps in the form of a new head coach or a rejuvenated approach. However, his role remained ambiguous from the outset: was he a consultant, a director of coaching, or an independent strategist? As the days passed, it became clear that Kirsten was merely serving as an auditor for the senior team—a concept alien to many cricket boards, especially in Bangladesh, where such nuance is often lost amid heightened expectations.

The idea that the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) required external consultancy just to recruit a coach speaks volumes about the administrative disarray within the system. The paradox here is glaring: a cricket board that has achieved notable success on the international stage still finds itself dependent on outsiders for tasks that should fall well within the remit of its own governance. Whether the reluctance to rely on homegrown talent stems from corruption, mismanagement, or an inability to foster professional collaboration, the result is a persistent inability to create a self-sustaining cricketing ecosystem.

Among the few notable recommendations Kirsten made was the idea of assigning separate coaches for different formats. On paper, the suggestion aligns with best practices in cricketing powerhouses such as Australia, England, and India. Yet, Bangladesh’s reality complicates such strategies. With a limited pool of quality players and an underdeveloped infrastructure, the logistics of managing three distinct coaching setups seem implausible. Furthermore, if Bangladesh struggles to manage one high-profile coach, how can it reasonably expect to handle multiple, each with their own demands and expectations? The professional environment necessary to implement such a vision simply does not exist.

The recent history of Bangladesh’s coaching appointments offers a sobering lesson. The departure of Chandika Hathurusingha, who orchestrated one of the team’s most impressive periods of growth, serves as a case study in the challenges of managing foreign expertise. Despite being the architect behind Bangladesh’s resurgence, Hathurusingha was relentlessly criticized, often unfairly, by sections of the media and fans. This wave of hostility—fueled by unfounded rumors and amplified across social media—eventually drove him away. Some speculate, albeit without concrete evidence, that even players within the national setup might have tacitly supported the smear campaign against him.

The saga reflects a deeper malaise: Bangladesh’s cricketing ecosystem seems to foster internal discord rather than unity. In stark contrast, smaller cricketing nations like Zimbabwe have managed to appoint experienced professionals such as Lalchand Rajput with relatively little friction. Yet, despite Bangladesh’s far superior resources and recent successes, the search for a head coach continues to flounder. Various reasons have been cited for this failure, from the financial allure of franchise leagues to difficulties in contract negotiations. However, one fundamental issue remains conspicuously overlooked: Bangladesh’s cricketing environment has become toxic, driving away the very professionals it seeks to attract.

At the heart of this toxicity is the undue influence of sections of the media. In Bangladesh, sports journalists often gain unchecked access to players and officials, blurring the lines between professional boundaries and personal relationships. This creates an unhealthy environment where stories—true or not—are spun into narratives that undermine team morale and disrupt coaching efforts. The intrusion of media into the sanctum of the dressing room is not only unprofessional but also detrimental to the team’s cohesion. Such behavior is tolerated, if not encouraged, by those within the cricket board itself, resulting in a system where rumor and propaganda flourish at the expense of stability.

No professional coach, however experienced or capable, would willingly work in such an atmosphere. The seeds of discord, sown by media figures with vested interests, continue to bear bitter fruit. If the BCB genuinely aspires to recruit a competent head coach, it must first address the structural and cultural flaws within its own organization. Governance reforms are imperative—not just to reduce media interference but to foster an environment where cricket can thrive without unnecessary distractions.

Until Bangladesh cricket confronts its internal demons, the search for a head coach will remain a futile endeavor. It is time for the BCB to clear the cobwebs from its own house. Only by eliminating toxic influences and cultivating professionalism can the Tigers hope to attract the leadership they need to realize their potential.

Thank You
Faisal Caesar 

Heath Streak: The Architect of Bangladesh’s Pace Revolution

When Heath Streak joined the Bangladesh cricket setup as the bowling coach, the Tigers were adrift in stormy seas. The team was reeling from off-field controversies, a series of humiliating defeats, and a morale that seemed beyond repair. The Bangladesh Cricket Board’s (BCB) decision to appoint Chandika Hathurusingha as head coach and Streak as the bowling coach during this crisis was viewed by many as a gamble. Yet, over time, this coaching duo proved to be a masterstroke, ushering in a new era of Bangladeshi cricket.

A Transformational Partnership 

Under the stewardship of Hathurusingha and Streak, alongside the leadership of Mashrafe Mortaza, Bangladesh cricket underwent a remarkable metamorphosis. The days of meek capitulations gave way to a fearless and assertive brand of cricket that won admirers worldwide. Victories against giants like England, India, Pakistan, and South Africa were no longer seen as flukes but as the outcomes of a methodical and determined approach. 

Hathurusingha focused on refining the players’ technical and mental resilience, while Streak spearheaded a revolution in the bowling department. For a team historically reliant on spin, fast bowling had always seemed a peripheral art. Pacers were used sparingly, often as placeholders until the spinners could be brought into the attack. Consequently, aspiring cricketers in Bangladesh rarely idolized fast bowlers. 

The Streak Effect 

Heath Streak changed all that. He tirelessly worked with Rubel Hossain, Taskin Ahmed, Al-Amin Hossain, and Mashrafe Mortaza, moulding them from mere supporting players into match-winners. His guidance didn’t just improve their technical skills—it transformed their mindset. For Streak, fast bowling wasn’t about filling overs; it was about taking wickets, dictating terms, and intimidating the opposition. 

Perhaps the crowning jewel of his tenure was the emergence of Mustafizur Rahman, whose meteoric rise owed much to Streak’s tutelage. Mustafiz’s mastery of cutters and variations became a nightmare for batsmen around the globe and symbolized the new face of Bangladesh’s pace attack. 

A New Identity for Bangladesh Cricket 

The impact of Streak’s efforts went far beyond individual players. Bangladesh’s bowling strategy underwent a paradigm shift. They began fielding pace-heavy lineups, even on home soil, where spin had traditionally ruled. The Tigers no longer hesitated to sacrifice a spinner for an extra pacer, reflecting a newfound confidence in their fast bowlers. 

This transformation had a ripple effect on the nation’s cricketing culture. Youngsters who once dreamed of becoming left-arm spinners like Shakib Al Hasan now aspire to emulate Taskin Ahmed, Rubel Hossain, or Mustafizur Rahman. Streak’s legacy was not merely in the wickets taken but in the dreams he ignited among a new generation of Bangladeshi cricketers. 

The Looming Departure 

Streak’s contract with Bangladesh, spanning 450 days over two years, was set to expire in June 2016. As the end of his tenure approached, rumours of him seeking new opportunities began to circulate. His interest in working with the BCCI’s National Cricket Academy in Bengaluru highlighted his ambition to broaden his horizons. For Bangladesh, however, his potential departure was a cause for concern. 

Streak’s intimate understanding of the team dynamics and his rapport with the players made him invaluable. Replacing him would be no easy task. The BCB faced a crucial decision: should they let go of the man who had laid the foundation for Bangladesh’s fast-bowling renaissance, or should they make every effort to retain him? 

Why the BCB Must Act 

Heath Streak is not merely a coach; he is a visionary who has reshaped the very identity of Bangladeshi cricket. Letting him go now would be akin to discarding the goose that lays golden eggs. While other candidates may possess the credentials to take on the role, none would have the same understanding of the team’s psyche or the nuanced challenges of Bangladeshi cricket. 

Moreover, continuity is critical for sustained success. The Hathurusingha-Streak combination has worked wonders, and disrupting that synergy could have unintended consequences. 

A Lesson in Retention 

The examples of other cricketing nations serve as a cautionary tale. Teams that failed to retain key personnel often struggled to maintain their upward trajectory. Conversely, those that prioritized continuity—Australia under John Buchanan or India under Ravi Shastri and Bharat Arun—reaped rich rewards. 

For Bangladesh, Heath Streak is not just a coach but an architect of their progress. Retaining him would signal the BCB’s commitment to long-term success. It would also reaffirm their belief in the value of investing in expertise rather than seeking short-term fixes. 

The Path Forward 

As Streak considers his options, the BCB must act decisively. Extending his contract, perhaps with enhanced responsibilities or incentives, would be a step in the right direction. Simultaneously, they should create a roadmap for further developing Bangladesh’s fast-bowling talent, ensuring that Streak’s work continues to bear fruit even after his eventual departure. 

Heath Streak’s legacy in Bangladesh cricket is already secure. However, whether that legacy is the beginning of a golden era or a fleeting chapter depends largely on the decisions made in the coming months. For the sake of Bangladesh cricket, one can only hope that the BCB recognizes the value of the man who has helped transform a dream into reality.  

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The Battle for Relevance: Bangladesh’s Test Cricket Dilemma

In cricket, as in life, the choices we make define our legacy. For Bangladesh, a nation striving to cement its place among cricket's elite, the decision to potentially reduce a Test match against Zimbabwe in January 2016 reveals a deeper tension within its cricketing priorities. 

 The Context: A Series in Question

The Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) has proposed scrapping one of the three Test matches from Zimbabwe's upcoming tour, citing the need to prepare for the Asia Cup T20 and World T20 that follow. Naimur Rahman, chairman of the BCB cricket operations committee, justified the move as a balance between player workload and the demands of a packed schedule. However, this decision, still pending Zimbabwe Cricket’s approval, raises fundamental questions about Bangladesh's commitment to Test cricket—a format long regarded as the ultimate benchmark of cricketing prowess. 

The Litmus Test of Excellence

Test cricket, often described as the soul of the game, offers more than just a contest of bat and ball—it is a measure of endurance, adaptability, and mental fortitude. For nations like Sri Lanka, Test cricket has historically been the proving ground for legitimacy on the global stage. 

In the 1990s, despite winning the World Cup in 1996, Sri Lanka's standing in world cricket remained questioned until their Test performances matured. Their stunning victory at The Oval in 1998 against England was a turning point, silencing critics and announcing their arrival as a force in the five-day format. For Sri Lanka, prioritizing Test cricket paid off in long-term dividends, cementing their reputation as a balanced cricketing powerhouse. 

Bangladesh, however, seems to be treading a different path. Despite achieving Test status in 2000 amid fervent national pride, the passion for the format has waned over the years. The evidence is stark: while the team has excelled in limited-overs cricket, their Test record remains underwhelming. 

The Persistent Undervaluation of Test Cricket

The proposal to reduce a Test against Zimbabwe is symptomatic of a broader cultural inclination in Bangladesh cricket. Test cricket, with its demanding nuances, has often been overshadowed by the allure of shorter formats. Fans, media, and even the governing bodies have historically favoured the quicker, more glamorous formats, where Bangladesh has found greater success. 

But this short-sighted approach risks undermining the nation’s long-term cricketing aspirations. Achieving consistency in Test cricket is the key to gaining global respect and ensuring the team's evolution beyond limited-overs success. 

Lost Opportunities Amid Rain and Surrender

Weather disruptions in the recent series against India and South Africa deprived Bangladesh of crucial opportunities to test themselves against top-tier opposition. Such matches, regardless of the outcomes, are invaluable for honing skills, testing strategies, and gaining experience. 

Even their performances in the home series against Pakistan in 2015 highlighted the volatility of Bangladesh's Test fortunes. A hard-fought draw in Khulna showcased the team’s potential, but the capitulation in Mirpur underscored the gaps in consistency and depth. These are issues that can only be addressed through sustained exposure to the rigours of Test cricket. 

Fitness, Workload, and the Need for Vision

Naimur Rahman has emphasized the importance of Test cricket, citing domestic tournaments like the Bangladesh Cricket League (BCL) and National Cricket League (NCL) as breeding grounds for long-format players. However, the reliance on domestic cricket alone is insufficient. Without regular Test matches, players cannot truly gauge their readiness for international challenges. 

Concerns about player fitness and busy schedules are valid but not insurmountable. Rotation policies, workload management, and the infusion of young talent could address these challenges. Zimbabwe, currently ranked lower than Bangladesh, offers an ideal platform to test emerging players, providing them with invaluable exposure while resting senior members of the squad. 

The Bigger Picture: A Test of Intent

Bangladesh's limited opportunities in Test cricket, especially against top-tier teams, make every bilateral series critical. Unlike England, Australia, or South Africa, Bangladesh cannot afford to be selective about Test matches. Each game is an opportunity to learn, improve, and prove their mettle. 

The decision to omit a Test against Zimbabwe reflects a prioritization of short-term gains over long-term growth. While success in T20 tournaments may boost morale and provide fleeting moments of joy, it is consistency in Test cricket that lays the foundation for lasting cricketing greatness. 

The Path Forward

Bangladesh cricket stands at a crossroads. To truly establish itself as a cricketing powerhouse, it must embrace the challenges of Test cricket with unwavering commitment. This requires a shift in mindset at all levels—from administrators to players to fans. 

Investing in young talent, prioritizing Test opportunities, and fostering a culture that values the longer format are essential steps toward achieving this goal. The legacy of Bangladesh cricket will not be defined by T20 wins but by its ability to compete—and win—against the best in the world in Test cricket. 

Conclusion

Cricket, like life, demands balance. In its pursuit of glory, Bangladesh must not lose sight of the foundation that Test cricket provides. The proposed reduction of a Test match against Zimbabwe is more than a scheduling adjustment—it is a reflection of the nation’s cricketing philosophy. 

For Bangladesh to truly ascend in world cricket, it must heed the lessons of history and the examples of nations like Sri Lanka. Success in Test cricket is not just a destination but a journey—a journey that Bangladesh must undertake with passion, purpose, and pride.  

 
Thank You

Faisal Caesar

A Resurgence Amidst Challenges: Bangladesh Cricket's Path to Redemption

 

Bangladesh cricket fans have had a turbulent year, fraught with frustration and disappointment. With 22 losses in 27 matches across formats by mid-September, the mood surrounding the Tigers was anything but optimistic. However, their recent triumphs against Zimbabwe—dominating both the Test and ODI series—have brought a much-needed wave of relief, restoring a semblance of confidence among the team and its supporters. While these victories signify a positive turnaround, they also cast a spotlight on the looming challenges that await Bangladesh on the grander stage of international cricket.  

Zimbabwe's Fragile State and Bangladesh's Tactical Capitalization  

There is no denying the struggles of Zimbabwe cricket, a team plagued by inexperience and inconsistency. Their lack of depth has been evident throughout the series, yet Bangladesh deserves credit for exploiting these vulnerabilities with precision. The Tigers' spinners were particularly instrumental in dismantling Zimbabwe, showcasing their expertise on subcontinental pitches. However, the performances also exposed worrying signs, particularly in the batting department.  

Despite playing on placid, batting-friendly tracks, Bangladesh’s top order often appeared fragile, with frequent collapses that left them scrambling to rebuild. Tinashe Panyangara, Zimbabwe’s spearhead, managed to unsettle the batsmen with sharp pace and well-directed short-pitched deliveries—raising concerns about the readiness of Bangladesh’s lineup for the more demanding challenges ahead.  

The Inevitable Litmus Test: Australia and New Zealand  

The upcoming ICC World Cup in Australia and New Zealand looms large as Bangladesh's next assignment. Unlike the familiar confines of home, these conditions present a formidable challenge. The last time the Tigers toured these nations was over a decade ago—Australia in 2008 and New Zealand in 2010. For most of the current squad, the experience of playing on fast, bouncy tracks remains an uncharted frontier.  

The core issue lies in technical limitations. Bangladeshi batsmen have often struggled outside their comfort zone, with a noticeable weakness in back-foot play and an inability to construct robust defences against high-quality pace. Over-reliance on Shakib Al Hasan, the team’s talismanic all-rounder, is another pressing concern. While Shakib's brilliance has often bailed the team out, one man alone cannot carry the burden of an entire squad.  

Bowling Woes: A Question of Adaptability  

On the bowling front, Bangladesh’s arsenal, dominated by finger spinners, is ill-suited for conditions in Australia and New Zealand. Hard and bouncy tracks offer little assistance to off-spinners, whereas leg-spinners tend to thrive. The emergence of Jubair Hossain offers a glimmer of hope, but the young leggie remains raw and untested on such a grand stage.  

Moreover, Bangladesh’s pace attack lacks the firepower needed to thrive in these conditions. Medium-fast bowlers, effective on subcontinental surfaces, are unlikely to trouble batsmen on tracks that demand sharp pace, disciplined back-of-a-length bowling, and pinpoint yorkers during the death overs.  

Structural Gaps and Missed Opportunities  

The Tigers’ predicament is symptomatic of deeper structural flaws in Bangladesh’s cricketing ecosystem. Despite the looming World Cup, there has been little effort to simulate the conditions players will face. Preparing pace-friendly pitches during the Zimbabwe series, for instance, could have been a valuable exercise in acclimatization. Unfortunately, such foresight has been lacking.  

Moreover, initiatives like sending junior teams to Australia and New Zealand to expose them to foreign conditions have rarely been prioritized. Such tours could have served as a vital learning curve for emerging players, laying the groundwork for long-term success.  

The Way Forward  

With just months remaining before the World Cup, the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) faces an uphill task to address these deficiencies. Appointing consultants familiar with Australian conditions—such as former captain Aminul Islam—could provide valuable insights. Additionally, while highly competent, the current coach Chandika Hathurusingha will need to work miracles in the limited time available to prepare his men.  

As the Tigers gear up for their campaign Down Under, fans can take solace in their recent victories but must temper expectations with realism. Competing in Australia and New Zealand requires more than raw talent—it demands adaptability, strategic planning, and the mental resilience to thrive outside one’s comfort zone. Whether Bangladesh can rise to this challenge remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the road ahead will be arduous, and only meticulous preparation can bridge the gap between promise and performance.  

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Bangladesh Cricket’s Moment of Reckoning: A Need for Reflection and Reform

 

Before the start of the three-match ODI series against India, Bangladesh captain Mushfiqur Rahim made a bold assertion: “And one should not forget that if they lose, India will lose, not India A. The pressure will be on them.” Rahim’s words carried confidence, a desire to assert dominance and put Bangladesh back on a winning path against a world champion side. Yet, as the series unfolded, the result went decisively in favour of the visitors, leaving Bangladesh’s team and its supporters disillusioned. Suresh Raina’s second-string Indian side served a lesson in humility and preparedness, punishing the hosts for underestimating their opposition.

In the high-stakes world of international cricket, actions often speak louder than words, and Bangladesh’s capitulation exposed troubling vulnerabilities. To be routed by a team absent of many of India’s top players not only damaged morale but cast doubt on Bangladesh’s readiness to compete at the highest level after more than a decade in international cricket.

The second ODI encapsulated the malaise. Chasing a modest 106 runs, Bangladesh faltered embarrassingly, failing to reach a target that even a competitive county cricket side might have achieved with minimal fuss. Such a meek surrender raises questions about the team’s strategic approach, professionalism, and its overall development trajectory.

One of the fundamental missteps was the choice of pitch for the second ODI. Bangladesh’s policymakers, aware that Indian players typically struggle on seaming, bouncy surfaces, decided to prepare a track with these characteristics. However, in their quest to unsettle the visitors, they overlooked an equally glaring reality: Bangladesh’s own batsmen are no better suited to handle pace and swing. Given the lack of fast-bowling-friendly pitches in Bangladesh’s domestic circuit, it was perhaps inevitable that Bangladesh’s batting would crumble.

The selection choices also perplexed many. Mominul Haque, a young talent who has shown comfort and competence at No. 4, was curiously promoted to No. 3 in the first match and then omitted entirely in the second ODI. With three fifties in his last eight ODIs, Mominul seemed a more promising option than some of the senior players who have consistently underperformed. Another oversight was the omission of Imrul Kayes, a batsman with a steady temperament who might have bolstered the fragile batting line-up.

Meanwhile, the decision to retain two out-of-form players, Nasir Hossain and Mahmudullah Riyad, is symptomatic of a larger issue. Tamim Iqbal’s inclusion, despite his frequent failures, raises questions about whether merit is being overlooked. In a cricketing ecosystem where players like Iqbal, Hossain, and Riyad are invaluable, the selectors must balance accountability with support. The board must address any technical flaws they identify, helping struggling players return to form rather than risking the loss of rare talents through premature exclusion.

At its core, this disappointing series against India underscores the need for the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) to reassess its management philosophy. For years, the board’s approach to damage control has been reactive, resorting to hasty personnel changes without addressing root causes. Such measures grounded more in optics than substance, have fostered instability and, too often, resulted in promising players being lost to short-sighted policies.

So, where does Bangladesh cricket go from here? The path forward must be one of introspection and reform. The BCB must abandon any tendencies toward nepotism or haphazard decision-making, cultivating instead a system that values consistency, transparency, and a long-term vision. Only by addressing these fundamental issues can Bangladesh hope to reclaim its competitive edge and fulfil the promise of a cricketing nation still waiting to make its mark on the world stage.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

The Appointment of Chandika Hathurusingha: A New Dawn for Bangladesh Cricket or Another Trial by Fire?

The waiting game is over. After weeks of speculation, the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) has made its decision—Chandika Hathurusingha, a former Sri Lankan batsman and seasoned coach, will take charge as the new head coach of the Bangladesh cricket team. Leaving his roles with New South Wales and the Sydney Thunder behind, Hathurusingha embarks on his first tenure as the head coach of an international side—and, crucially, a Test-playing nation. He is set to arrive in Dhaka by June 10, marking the beginning of what could be a transformative but challenging journey.

But his appointment raises familiar questions: Is Hathurusingha the right choice? Can he shoulder the weight of expectations? While some have lauded the BCB’s selection, others—ever quick to criticize—have expressed skepticism. Yet, to dismiss him prematurely would be to ignore both his pedigree and potential. To understand why, we must delve deeper into Hathurusingha’s journey and the challenges he now faces.

From Promise to Pariah: Hathurusingha’s Journey Through Cricket

As a cricketer, Hathurusingha showcased flashes of brilliance. A compact opening batsman with a full repertoire of strokes, he formed a solid partnership with Roshan Mahanama until the explosive arrival of Sanath Jayasuriya changed Sri Lanka’s batting approach. In addition to his batting, Hathurusingha contributed with medium-pace bowling, often picking up critical wickets in crucial moments. However, inconsistency marred his career, and despite a promising start against New Zealand, his international journey was abruptly curtailed. His final appearance for Sri Lanka came in 1999, after which he faded from the national setup.

Rather than wallowing in disappointment, Hathurusingha redirected his energies toward coaching, determined to master the game from the other side of the boundary. His initial assignments included coaching the UAE and Sri Lanka A, where he quickly made a name for himself with a methodical, no-nonsense approach. However, controversy would follow him—a pattern that would test both his resolve and reputation.

Hathurusingha’s tenure as assistant coach of Sri Lanka’s national team ended abruptly in 2010, after he left a tour of Zimbabwe early to attend a coaching course in Australia without the board’s permission. Despite pleas from captain Kumar Sangakkara to reinstate him—Sangakkara hailed his ability to "out-work, out-think, and out-shine" foreign coaches—the Sri Lankan cricket board remained unmoved. Disillusioned, Hathurusingha sought permanent residency in Australia and began a new chapter in his coaching career.

Over the following years, he honed his craft with New South Wales, steadily building his reputation as an astute tactician. Even as he struggled to find success with the Sydney Thunder in the Big Bash League, his work with New South Wales earned widespread praise. Now, having accepted the mantle of Bangladesh’s head coach, Hathurusingha faces his toughest challenge yet.

A Task Beyond Tactics: Stabilizing a Fragile Team

The Tigers have always been a team of contradictions—brilliant on some days, brittle on others. One of Hathurusingha’s most immediate challenges will be restoring the squad’s shaken confidence. The scars of inconsistency have left the players vulnerable to self-doubt, and without stability, individual brilliance often dissipates into collective underperformance. Hathurusingha must serve not only as a tactician but as a motivator—someone capable of rebuilding morale while cultivating mental toughness.

However, technical expertise alone won’t suffice. To succeed in Bangladesh, Hathurusingha will need to immerse himself in the domestic cricket landscape, where the future of the national team is shaped. His ability to identify and nurture emerging talent will be essential in bridging the gap between potential and performance. Moreover, his success hinges on his capacity to connect with both players and fans, for coaching in Bangladesh is as much about relationships as it is about results.

The Unseen Burden: Navigating BCB’s Politics

Yet, the obstacles before Hathurusingha extend beyond the cricket field. The BCB has long struggled with internal politics, favoritism, and interference, which have stifled the development of Bangladeshi cricket. Too often, coaches and captains have been treated as mere extensions of the board’s authority—remote-controlled figures expected to carry out directives without question. Such a culture not only undermines leadership but also erodes trust and fosters dysfunction within the team.

For Hathurusingha to succeed, the BCB must offer him the autonomy he needs to implement his vision. Coaches like Hathurusingha, known for their disciplined, independent style, are unlikely to thrive under constant interference. The board’s ability to respect boundaries and prioritize long-term planning over short-term whims will determine the success of this partnership. Without this freedom, even the most talented coach can find himself shackled, unable to make meaningful progress.

The Role of Patience: Managing Expectations

Bangladesh’s cricketing fraternity—both officials and fans—has a tendency to expect instant results, often viewing foreign coaches as miracle workers. But cricket, like any craft, requires time, trust, and patience. Hathurusingha’s success will not come from quick fixes but from steady, incremental improvements. For the Tigers to evolve into a consistent force, fans must temper their expectations and support the process, even when setbacks occur. Transformation in cricket, as in life, rarely happens overnight.

A Fork in the Road: Opportunity and Risk

The arrival of Hathurusingha offers Bangladesh cricket a rare opportunity—a chance to move beyond its history of fleeting successes and build a team capable of sustained excellence. His appointment is not without risks, but it also carries immense promise. With his technical acumen, global experience, and ability to command respect, Hathurusingha has the tools to elevate Bangladesh’s cricketing fortunes.

At the same time, the BCB must recognize that coaches are not magicians. The board’s role is to create an environment in which the coach can thrive—a space free from political interference, where cricket takes precedence over personal agendas. If the BCB fails in this regard, even the most capable coach will struggle to deliver.

A Journey Begins: The Road Ahead for Hathurusingha and the Tigers

The journey ahead will not be easy. Hathurusingha inherits a team brimming with potential but haunted by inconsistency. His task is as much about stabilizing as it is about innovating, as much about empathy as it is about strategy. In a cricketing culture that demands both success and friendship, Hathurusingha must strike a delicate balance—earning the trust of his players while pushing them to reach new heights.

If given the space to work freely, Hathurusingha could lay the foundation for a new era in Bangladesh cricket. But success will require more than just his expertise; it will demand patience, understanding, and above all, unity—from the players, the board, and the fans.

As Bangladesh embarks on this new chapter under Hathurusingha’s guidance, the hopes of a nation rest on more than just his shoulders. They rest on the collective will to move forward, to shed the distractions of the past, and to embrace the future with clarity and purpose. If the Tigers can do that, then perhaps, under Hathurusingha, they will finally roar—not just in moments, but in seasons to come.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

The Tigers’ Dilemma: The Quest for Leadership in Bangladesh Cricket

Bangladesh cricket stands at a pivotal crossroads, grappling with the departure of Shane Jurgensen and the subsequent leadership void. This moment, fraught with uncertainty, is also ripe with possibility. The Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) must now make a decision that will shape the trajectory of the national team—not just for the immediate future, but for years to come. 

Shane Jurgensen’s Tenure: A Study in Contradictions

Shane Jurgensen’s journey with Bangladesh cricket was one of highs and lows. Initially hired as a bowling coach, his promotion to interim head coach in 2012 came amid tumultuous circumstances following Richard Pybus’s abrupt exit. Jurgensen’s early impact was undeniable: a historic series win against the West Indies brought him acclaim and earned him the role of full-time head coach in 2013. 

Under Jurgensen, the Tigers achieved notable milestones, defying expectations against stronger opponents. Yet, the fleeting nature of success in cricket quickly turned the tide. A disappointing 2014 campaign, punctuated by lacklustre performances in the Asia Cup and World Twenty20, drew sharp criticism. The media and fans—always fervent in their support or disapproval—were quick to scapegoat Jurgensen. 

The relationship between Jurgensen and the BCB soured, culminating in his resignation. While his exit marked the end of a tumultuous chapter, it left Bangladesh cricket in a precarious position. With the ICC World Cup looming, the team faced the dual challenge of rebuilding confidence and finding a visionary leader to guide them through this critical phase. 

The Perennial Debate: Local vs. Foreign Coaches

Jurgensen’s departure rekindled a long-standing debate in Bangladesh cricket: should the team persist with foreign expertise, or entrust its future to a homegrown coach? Historically, the BCB has favoured foreign coaches, a strategy rooted in the belief that local options lack the requisite experience and technical acumen. While this approach has yielded some success, it has also exposed inherent vulnerabilities, particularly in terms of understanding the unique cultural and emotional landscape of Bangladeshi cricket. 

Prominent figures such as Aminul Islam, Sarwar Imran, and Khaled Mahmud have emerged as potential candidates to challenge this narrative. Their extensive experience and deep understanding of the local cricketing ethos position them as credible contenders. Yet, scepticism remains. The pressures of international cricket, magnified in a cricket-obsessed nation, demand a level of resilience and adaptability that few local coaches have had the opportunity to develop. 

The Case for Continuity: Revisiting Foreign Expertise

The BCB’s preference for foreign coaches continues to dominate discussions, with high-profile names such as Andy Flower, Michael Bevan, and Chandika Hathurusingha being floated as potential candidates. The rationale is clear: foreign coaches bring a wealth of experience, innovative strategies, and a degree of detachment that can be invaluable in high-pressure environments. 

For a team preparing for the ICC World Cup, an experienced foreign coach could provide the immediate solutions needed to bolster performance. Figures like Dav Whatmore and Ian Pont, who have previously worked with the Tigers, stand out as pragmatic choices. Their familiarity with Bangladesh’s cricketing culture could help bridge the gap between short-term fixes and long-term growth. Pairing such a coach with a local assistant could create a synergy that combines innovation with cultural insight. 

The Bold Leap: Trusting Local Talent

Despite the allure of foreign expertise, there is a compelling case for placing trust in local coaches. Aminul Islam, Khaled Mahmud, and Sarwar Imran have honed their skills through years of domestic and international exposure. They possess an intrinsic understanding of the challenges faced by Bangladeshi cricketers—both on and off the field. 

As Ian Pont once observed, the real challenge in Bangladesh lies not just in coaching but in navigating the external pressures: the fervent media scrutiny, the impassioned fanbase, and the relentless expectations. Local coaches, more than anyone, are attuned to these dynamics. 

By appointing a local coach, the BCB would send a powerful message about its faith in homegrown talent. Such a decision would not only empower aspiring coaches but also foster a sense of national pride. However, this path is not without risks. Bangladesh’s track record with local coaches at the highest level remains limited, and there are legitimate concerns about whether they can consistently deliver results against top-tier teams. 

What’s at Stake: A Vision for the Future

The BCB’s decision must transcend short-term considerations. While immediate performance is crucial, particularly with the ICC World Cup on the horizon, the board must also lay the groundwork for sustainable success. This requires a clear vision that balances tactical acumen with developmental goals. 

If the focus is solely on stabilizing the team, a seasoned foreign coach might be the safest bet. However, if the BCB is serious about fostering long-term growth, it may be time to embrace the risk of appointing a local coach. This could be supplemented by investing in coaching education, creating pathways for talent development, and ensuring that local coaches have access to the resources needed to succeed. 

Conclusion: A Defining Moment for Bangladesh Cricket

Bangladesh cricket stands on the cusp of transformation. The decision to appoint a new head coach is more than a managerial choice; it is a reflection of the BCB’s vision for the future. Whether the board opts for the experience of a foreign coach or the potential of a local leader, the stakes are immense. 

The Tigers need a leader who can navigate the complexities of Bangladeshi cricket with wisdom and patience, balancing the pressures of immediate performance with the promise of sustained growth. In this moment of transition, the BCB has the opportunity to redefine the identity of Bangladesh cricket—a challenge as daunting as it is exhilarating. The world is watching, and the path the Tigers take will shape not only their destiny but also the perception of Bangladesh as a cricketing nation.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Cricket, Flags, and Fanhood: The Bangladesh Cricket Board’s Controversial Decision

Bangladesh’s cricket fans have always been celebrated as some of the world’s most passionate and vibrant. They bring colour and life to stadiums in Mirpur, Chittagong, Khulna, and Fatullah, where their support transcends borders. Their cheers and flags wave with equal vigour for teams from India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Afghanistan, creating an atmosphere where every team feels at home. This lively hospitality was on full display during the recent Asia Cup in Dhaka. There, flags of different nations fluttered alongside Bangladesh’s own in a show of cricket’s unifying power – turning the stadium into a symbol of shared passion and sportsmanship.

However, in a surprising turn of events, the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) issued a directive on the eve of the country’s 43rd Independence Day, threatening to ban Bangladeshi fans from carrying foreign flags at World Twenty20 matches. BCB spokesman Jalal Younis explained that local fans carrying flags of competing teams were violating Bangladesh’s “flag rules.” Security personnel were ordered to enforce this rule and ensure that fans displayed only the Bangladeshi flag.

This directive has shocked many cricket enthusiasts, myself included. Such a sudden rule feels strangely restrictive, especially in the context of cricket. Sporting events, particularly international ones, are about fostering camaraderie and respecting the spirit of sportsmanship. In many other cricketing nations – England, Australia, South Africa – fans routinely wave the flags of competing teams. During Bangladesh’s tour of England in 2005, English fans proudly displayed Bangladeshi flags. Similarly, in the 2009 World Twenty20, fans from various countries waved Bangladeshi flags to support Shakib Al Hasan, recognizing his skill and passion.

So, why this abrupt change from the BCB? Why should Bangladesh, a democratic nation that values freedom of expression, impose restrictions on how fans express their support? Supporting another team while one’s national team isn’t playing should be seen as an expression of sportsmanship, not as an affront to national pride. This decision risks stifling the authentic and inclusive spirit that makes Bangladeshi fans admired around the world.

The question also arises as to whether the BCB is encroaching on an area typically overseen by the International Cricket Council (ICC). In an ICC event, standards for fan behaviour are usually set by the global body, aiming to maintain a celebratory and inclusive environment. Some critics speculate that this flag rule was prompted by increased Pakistani support during the Asia Cup, which may have reminded certain quarters of the complex historical relationship between Bangladesh and Pakistan. But conflating political history with sports is counterproductive and risks alienating fans who view cricket as a unifying force rather than a divisive one.

To demand that fans only cheer for their national team borders on an intrusion into personal expression. The fans waving Pakistani or Indian flags aren’t endorsing political figures or historical conflicts; they’re celebrating players who inspire millions with their skill and dedication. Cricket, at its essence, is a game meant to transcend politics, uniting people through shared passion. It’s shortsighted to let political grievances eclipse that unity. Neither Virat Kohli nor Shahid Afridi represents political institutions or historical conflicts; they represent the beauty of the game itself, spreading joy and excitement wherever they play.

The BCB’s directive may have been born of patriotic intentions, but it risks turning patriotism into an instrument of control, one that dims the vibrant spirit that makes Bangladeshi fans unique. As ambassadors of cricket, fans should have the freedom to support, wave flags, and express their love for players of any nationality. Let us keep cricket a pure celebration of skill, camaraderie, and mutual respect.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

A Nation’s Pride at Stake: Bangladesh Cricket Faces an Uncertain Test Future Amid ICC Reforms

Cricket in Bangladesh is more than a game; it is a national unifier, a point of pride, and a sanctuary for a people often left disheartened by the volatility of politics. In times of upheaval, cricket offers Bangladeshis a rare chance for jubilation, a momentary escape from the frustrations of daily life. But troubling clouds are gathering over the future of Bangladesh cricket—a future that now seems vulnerable to decisions being shaped beyond its borders.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) has proposed a sweeping structural overhaul that could relegate Bangladesh from the core of international Test cricket. At the heart of this restructuring plan, led by cricket’s financial giants India, England, and Australia, are provisions that could potentially exile Bangladesh and Zimbabwe from top-tier Test matches. The proposal would establish a two-tier system where only the top eight nations play in the primary league, while the remaining nations compete in the Intercontinental Cup alongside Associate nations, effectively demoting Bangladesh to a lower rung of competition.

The implications are staggering. If accepted, the proposal could mean that Bangladesh will be locked out of Test cricket for as long as eight years, relegated to four-day matches against lesser-known cricketing nations. After eight years, Bangladesh would have to top the second-tier standings to even have a chance to face the bottom team in the top tier—a gauntlet that diminishes the progress they have made over the last fourteen years since earning Test status. It is a proposition that risks squandering the promising talents of Bangladeshi players like Mominul Haque, Sohag Gazi, Nasir Hossain, Mushfiqur Rahim, Shakib Al Hasan, and Tamim Iqbal, all of whom have shown resilience and capability in the longer format.

Bangladesh has, admittedly, struggled to achieve consistent Test success over the years. However, recent tours in Sri Lanka and New Zealand displayed promising growth and competitive spirit that reflect the nation’s growing understanding of the nuances of Test cricket. Relegating Bangladesh at this point seems not only premature but unjust, especially when some other countries, which dominate solely on home turf, continue to secure their places in the top tier despite weak overseas performances. 

Moreover, the financial justification behind the proposal also deserves scrutiny. Although India, England, and Australia undoubtedly bring substantial revenue to world cricket, Bangladesh’s fanbase offers a significant contribution, bringing in sizable viewership and engagement. The enthusiasm for cricket in Bangladesh often exceeds that in established cricket nations like New Zealand and the West Indies. To tag Bangladesh as a “minnow” and deny them the opportunity to compete regularly against the top teams is to stunt the very growth the ICC claims to foster.

This proposal has rightly provoked concern and opposition from other cricket boards, including South Africa, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. Yet, dishearteningly, the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) has not rallied behind its fans or players with the same vigour. Instead, the BCB directors have surprisingly backed the proposal, citing potential financial benefits as the justification. The decision has left fans, players, and even former Bangladeshi cricketers feeling betrayed. In their vote, the BCB appears more a business entity than a steward of Bangladeshi cricket’s legacy and future. 

This shift in stance is particularly dismaying given the high hopes placed on BCB President Nazmul Hassan Papon, who until now has been a strong advocate for Bangladesh cricket. But with the board’s endorsement of the ICC proposal, it seems the weight of immediate financial gains has overshadowed the long-term vision needed to protect the nation’s Test aspirations. The decision feels detached from the very fans whose loyalty and passion are the lifeblood of Bangladeshi cricket. It dismisses the dreams of young players who aspire to wear the Test whites and disregards the countless supporters who invest their emotions, time, and hopes in every match.

With the ICC meeting in Dubai only days away, the BCB still has an opportunity to reconsider its stance and advocate for Bangladesh’s rightful place in world cricket. While nations like South Africa and Pakistan stand in solidarity, the primary responsibility lies with the BCB itself. The board must recognize that Bangladesh’s Test future is not just about financials—it’s about the spirit, pride, and unity of a cricket-loving nation. To preserve these values, the BCB should adopt a more strategic and assertive stance, one that not only protects Bangladesh’s future in Test cricket but also respects the undying loyalty of its fans. 

As Bangladesh faces this critical juncture, the message to the BCB is clear: think beyond short-term gains and embrace the long-term vision for a nation where cricket is both a unifier and a point of pride. Let the voices of the fans echo in Dubai, for they are the heartbeat of Bangladesh cricket.

Thank You
Faisal Caesar

Uncertainty Clouds the Dhaka Premier League: A Critical Test for Bangladeshi Cricket

Bangladesh cricket is never short on drama. Even in the absence of international matches, the game continues to capture headlines, with the Dhaka Premier League (DPL) now taking centre stage. Amid the ripples of the recent spot-fixing scandal, the league’s impending kickoff is wrapped in controversy, suspense, and a tug-of-war between players and the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB). 

This year’s contention centres around the BCB’s newly proposed transfer system. Under this system, players have been categorized into seven tiers, from A+ to E, each with a fixed pay structure, with the top tier starting at $28,300. The player draft will proceed with clubs selecting players by lottery—a significant departure from previous years when players had the freedom to choose their own teams. With 184 players listed across categories, the random selection method aims to distribute talent more equitably but has met resistance from top players and the Cricketers' Welfare Association of Bangladesh (CWAB), who argue that this system restricts players' freedom and lacks sufficient consultation.

BCB chief Nazmul Hasan recently addressed this discontent, acknowledging the widespread anxiety surrounding not just the transfer policy but also the upcoming report from the ICC's Anti-Corruption and Security Unit (ACSU). Slated for release during the ICC annual conference in London, this report on the Bangladesh Premier League (BPL) spot-fixing scandal could name additional players involved in corruption. Any such revelation would deeply affect the Dhaka Premier League, a critical event in keeping Bangladeshi players active in the absence of international fixtures. Moreover, if the DPL is postponed due to this report or delayed by the monsoon season, its future seems increasingly uncertain.

The implications of such a delay are troubling. Since the Zimbabwe tour, Bangladesh’s cricketers have seen little to no competitive action, and they have no scheduled international fixtures until October, when they face New Zealand. The Dhaka Premier League is an essential means of bridging this gap, providing a platform for players to maintain match fitness and stay sharp. Without regular play, the players risk losing their competitive edge, potentially impacting their performance when the international season resumes.

The DPL has always been more than just a domestic league—it is a lifeline for Bangladesh’s cricket ecosystem, a place where emerging talent can shine alongside seasoned players. Yet, the current state of affairs is a complex entanglement of unresolved issues. The tension between the players, the CWAB, and the BCB—each with its own stake in the league's outcome—adds layers to the already convoluted dynamics surrounding Bangladeshi cricket governance.

At a critical juncture, this is a call for urgency. The league's timely commencement is not only vital for keeping players engaged but also for the morale of a fan base that thrives on cricket’s rhythm and excitement. Prolonged inactivity could cool the engines of Bangladesh’s cricketing machinery, making it harder to gear up against formidable opponents like New Zealand. 

For Bangladeshi cricket fans, the complexities surrounding the Dhaka Premier League might appear like yet another chapter in the country's love affair with needless complications. But beneath this veneer lies a crucial truth: Bangladesh cricket needs the Dhaka Premier League to stay on course. As passionate spectators, all we can do is hope that this storm of uncertainty will pass, and that our players will be back in action soon, prepared and focused on the challenges ahead.

 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Guardians of Integrity: Bangladesh Cricket’s Fight Against the Menace of Spot-Fixing

The recent arrest of three Indian cricketers, including pace bowler Sreesanth, over allegations of spot-fixing in the IPL has shaken the cricketing world. The revelation casts a troubling shadow over cricket’s integrity, adding another chapter to the sport’s struggle with match-fixing—a "disease" that has lingered, unchecked, for decades. In the news echoing across the subcontinent, there was even an unverified mention by police sources of a prominent Bangladeshi player’s possible involvement, though he never participated in the IPL. 

Such vague claims often emerge in high-stakes investigations, and though they fuel headlines, only substantiated evidence can turn suspicion into fact. Without caution, speculation can become sensationalism. There’s a danger that if too many unverified leads are pursued, the narrative could spin out, absurdly involving even the most improbable of characters. In Bangladesh, such claims were received with scepticism, with fans reacting on social media with humour to what many perceived as an exaggerated, even farcical, allegation.

Nevertheless, the stain of spot-fixing has already tainted Bangladesh’s domestic scene. During the inaugural Bangladesh Premier League (BPL), former cricketer Shariful Haque was banned indefinitely after allegations of match-fixing. Mashrafe Mortaza, a respected Bangladeshi cricketer, had claimed he was approached by a match-fixer, prompting an immediate investigation and Shariful’s subsequent ban. His fate marked a harsh first in Bangladesh’s cricketing history, underscoring the reality that this threat isn’t confined to foreign leagues—it is a global issue, and one that Bangladesh must contend with.

In this climate, the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) has a critical responsibility to protect the game. Cricket’s increasing financial rewards can make vulnerable, often young, players susceptible to corruption. Many players hail from rural areas, bringing limited formal education and little understanding of the potential pitfalls awaiting them in the professional world. For them, the lure of fast money can be hard to resist. These players, and indeed all young cricketers, need more than cricketing skills to succeed; they need ethical guidance and protection from unsavoury influences.

BCB’s role is not just administrative; it’s paternal. The board must establish education programs that build awareness of the ethical dimensions of cricket and instil respect for its principles. Players need to understand that while money is a part of the sport, it’s hard work, not shortcuts, that yields true success. Senior cricketers and officials should mentor emerging players, providing a counterbalance to the allure of easy money. These veterans, respected for their contributions, can impart lessons on integrity and sportsmanship, values fundamental to preserving the sanctity of the game.

Additionally, financial stability is key to insulating players from corruption. Many young cricketers come from modest backgrounds and are reliant on BCB stipends or domestic team payments. Delays in payments or financial instability create the conditions for players to consider alternative, unethical sources of income. The BCB must ensure timely payments, reducing the likelihood of frustration or desperation that can lead a player astray.

Agents, too, require strict oversight. The BCB should enforce regulations that vet agents’ qualifications and backgrounds. Unscrupulous agents can exert dangerous influence, introducing players to murky financial schemes under the guise of professional management. Domestic umpires should also be closely monitored, as the integrity of officials is equally crucial in safeguarding the game. Bangladesh’s own Nadir Shah, a once-prominent umpire, saw his career end in disgrace due to fixing allegations, a stark reminder of the need for constant vigilance.

Bangladeshi cricketers, increasingly seen as marketing assets, attract interest from corporate sponsors, businessmen, and even politicians. While not all sponsors pose risks, some can exploit players’ financial needs, viewing cricket as a business opportunity rather than a sport. These players should be supported to navigate sponsorship opportunities without compromising their integrity or the game’s spirit. Maintaining boundaries and monitoring player associations with influential figures can help ensure that cricket remains a source of national pride and personal accomplishment, not merely a commercial enterprise.

The upcoming Dhaka Premier League presents an opportunity for the BCB to implement these protections within Bangladesh’s domestic circuit. Corruption poses a real threat to Bangladesh’s cricketing future, and the BCB must adopt firm policies to prevent the spread of match-fixing. BCB President Nazmul Hasan stands out as a leader who prioritizes the integrity of cricket above personal profit. Despite being a businessman himself, his reverence for the sport suggests he will take the decisive action necessary to protect Bangladesh’s cricket from the taint of corruption.

While money will always be a part of professional sports, it must not overshadow cricket’s essence. By fostering a culture of integrity, Bangladesh can help secure a brighter, cleaner future for the game, ensuring that cricket’s spirit outlasts the shadow of spot-fixing.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

A Glimpse into the Future: Bangladesh’s Rising Stars from the U-19 World Cup

The recently concluded ICC Under-19 World Cup in Australia was a showcase of future cricketing talents from across the globe. Teams like India, South Africa, Australia, Sri Lanka, West Indies, and Pakistan brought to light some exciting young prospects, hinting at the bright futures that await them at the international stage. Bangladesh, too, unearthed a few gems who demanded attention—not just for their numbers but for their temperament and technique, qualities often found lacking in the country's senior cricketers.  

At the forefront of this emerging brigade are Anamul Haque, Litton Das, and Soumya Sarkar. These three cricketers displayed a level of maturity and skill that is rare in Bangladesh cricket’s youth, raising hopes that the nation's longstanding search for reliable top-order batsmen may finally be coming to an end. The performances of these young players were not just promising—they were statements, loud and clear, that they are ready to shoulder responsibilities in the next phase of Bangladesh cricket.  

Stars of the Campaign: Anamul, Litton, and Soumya  

Anamul Haque was the standout performer among the trio, leading the tournament’s run-scoring chart with 365 runs at an impressive average of 60.83 and a strike rate of 85.08. His tally included two centuries and a fifty—innings that not only earned wins for his team but also demonstrated his ability to rise to the occasion. What distinguished Anamul was his poise under pressure. He thrived on challenging tracks where the ball swung and demanded precise technique, conditions that have historically troubled even Bangladesh’s most seasoned batsmen.  

Litton Das was equally impressive, accumulating 262 runs at an average of 52.40, including a century and two fifties. His ability to adapt his game to different situations was remarkable. Litton played with confidence against the moving ball, both on the front and back foot, a rare sight among Bangladeshi batsmen accustomed to subcontinental conditions. He showed that he could occupy the crease for long periods, a quality desperately needed at the top of the order.  

Meanwhile, Soumya Sarkar—Litton’s opening partner—may not have enjoyed the same consistency but left an impression with his all-round contributions. His 73 in the quarterfinals against Australia’s formidable attack showcased his potential to thrive in high-pressure scenarios. Soumya’s additional value as a part-time bowler, picking up four wickets at an average of 21.25 and an economy rate of 5.79, hinted at the versatility that could make him an asset in the future.

A New Dawn for Bangladesh’s Batting Order  

The emergence of Anamul, Litton, and Soumya comes at a critical juncture for Bangladesh cricket. For years, the national team has relied heavily on the individual brilliance of players like Tamim Iqbal and Shakib Al Hasan, often without sufficient support from the rest of the batting order. Tamim, in particular, has long lacked a dependable opening partner, while the middle order still leans heavily on Shakib to rescue games. Litton’s ability to anchor the innings at the top could perfectly complement Tamim, and Soumya’s aggressive flair may make him an ideal candidate for the No. 3 spot. Anamul, with his solidity, could stabilize the middle order—offering Bangladesh much-needed depth and structure.  

Many might argue that these young players need time to mature before being thrown into the deep waters of international cricket. But in truth, their performances suggest otherwise. They are already equipped with the temperament necessary to thrive at the highest level. In a nation where Test cricket opportunities are limited, the best way to prepare these talents is to expose them early to the rigours of first-class and international competition.  

The current system cannot afford to wait for these players to ripen slowly—Bangladesh must act decisively to integrate them into the national framework. Mediocrity has been tolerated for far too long, with many long-serving players contributing little to the team’s progress. A bold step is needed to ensure these young stars do not fade into obscurity, as has tragically happened with others before them.  

The Lessons of the Past: Avoiding Another Lost Generation  

The biggest threat to these rising talents lies not in their abilities but in the management of the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB). The BCB has a troubling history of mishandling promising players, with names like Shahriar Nafees, Aftab Ahmed, and Alok Kapali standing as stark reminders of what happens when the potential is squandered. These players arrived with great fanfare, only to be mismanaged, misused, and ultimately forgotten—a testament to the lack of foresight within Bangladesh’s cricketing ecosystem.  

Young talents need more than just selection—they require mentorship, guidance, and a nurturing environment that balances development with exposure. Cricket boards like the BCB must emulate the strategies employed by figures such as *Sourav Ganguly* and *Imran Khan*, who took active roles in shaping the careers of their younger teammates. Ganguly’s encouragement of players like MS Dhoni and Yuvraj Singh, or Imran Khan’s mentorship of Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis, are examples of how great leaders cultivate talent. Bangladesh’s seniors must adopt a similar responsibility, not merely sharing tactical advice but also imparting lessons on professionalism and discipline.  

Guarding Against the Lure of T20 Leagues  

A critical challenge lies in balancing ambition with discipline. The lure of T20 leagues can often be overwhelming for young cricketers, promising instant financial rewards but threatening to stunt long-term growth. Anamul, Litton, and Soumya must not be allowed to drift into the comfort of short-form cricket too soon. The temptation of immediate success can derail careers that should otherwise flourish over the longer arc of Test cricket. The BCB must resist the urge to prioritize short-term gains over sustainable development, ensuring that these players grow into complete cricketers rather than mere entertainers.  

A Time for Bold Decisions  

The emergence of Anamul, Litton, and Soumya signals the dawn of a new chapter for Bangladesh cricket—one that promises hope, provided it is handled with care. These young players possess the technique, temperament, and hunger to succeed at the highest level, but they need a system that supports and nurtures their development. The BCB must break from the mistakes of the past and provide them with the tools and opportunities to thrive.  

This is not the time for hesitation. It is a time for bold decisions, and for embracing the future with confidence. Bangladesh has long waited for dependable top-order batsmen—now that they are here, it is up to the cricket board, senior players, and fans to ensure that these young stars are given the best possible chance to shine. The nation cannot afford another lost generation. The journey of Anamul, Litton, and Soumya must be one of steady growth, not fleeting promise. The future beckons—it is time to answer the call.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

 

The Perils of Power: Shakib Al Hasan’s Axing and the Fragile Nature of Leadership in Bangladesh Cricket

 

As Dhaka braces for the glamour of Lionel Messi’s arrival in the much-anticipated Argentina-Nigeria clash, the Bangladesh cricket fraternity finds itself in turmoil. The Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) has unceremoniously stripped Shakib Al Hasan of the captaincy, with vice-captain Tamim Iqbal also removed from his leadership role. A decision that reflects not only on the volatile dynamics of Bangladeshi cricket but also on the complexities of leadership and the fragile relationship between talent and responsibility.

The Rise of a Cricketing Icon

Shakib's journey to the top was a story of meteoric ascent. Stepping into the captaincy when Mashrafe Mortaza was sidelined by injury, Shakib quickly emerged as the undisputed leader of a young, ambitious team. His dynamic presence on the field, sharp cricketing mind, and ability to lead by example elevated Bangladesh’s profile on the international stage. Under his stewardship, the Tigers earned memorable victories, and Shakib himself became a figure of national pride—embodying Bangladesh’s growing stature in world cricket.  

Yet, with every peak comes the threat of a fall. Shakib’s on-field brilliance was soon overshadowed by off-field turbulence. The recent series defeat against Zimbabwe, which saw a lacklustre display from both players and leadership, exacerbated frustrations. However, what seemed to seal his fate was not poor form but his behaviour away from the field—deemed arrogant by the BCB and unbecoming of a national captain.

Youth, Fame, and the Pitfalls of Success

Shakib’s removal raises critical questions about how leadership is cultivated and managed in modern sports. At 24 years old, it’s not unusual for an athlete to struggle with the sudden pressures of fame, wealth, and responsibility. Shakib found himself thrust into the dual burden of leading a national side while managing the distractions that come with success. His story is not unique—sports history is littered with young stars whose talents were nearly derailed by the weight of expectations.   

Rather than nurturing their young captain through these inevitable growing pains, the BCB chose the path of punitive action. In axing Shakib, the board may have sown seeds of discord between themselves and one of the finest talents the nation has ever produced. What might have been a defining partnership between a gifted cricketer and a maturing institution now risks turning into an avoidable conflict.

The BCB's decision reflects a deeper issue: a lack of structured mentoring and emotional support within the team environment. Cricket boards elsewhere have invested in psychological training, leadership development, and mentorship programs to help young captains grow into their roles. The absence of such systems in Bangladesh leaves players vulnerable, forced to navigate fame and leadership with little guidance. 

Had the BCB implemented a structured mentoring program, perhaps drawing expertise from countries like Australia, South Africa, or England, Shakib’s trajectory might have been different. In fact, many cricket boards across the world recognize that leadership is not just about tactical acumen but also about personal growth—and that even the most talented individuals need help to grow into effective leaders.

A Tale of Two Captains: Lessons from Dhoni

A parallel can be drawn with India’s captain, Mahendra Singh Dhoni, who, like Shakib, faced immense pressure during a crisis. After a disastrous 0-4 whitewash in England, the media and fans clamoured for Dhoni’s removal. But the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) resisted the urge to axe him, recognizing that leaders—no matter how successful—will inevitably face rough patches. Dhoni’s quiet resilience through those troubled times is now the stuff of legend, as he went on to guide India to greater heights.  

The BCB might have drawn a lesson from this. Shakib is to Bangladesh what Dhoni is to India—a natural leader with the ability to galvanize a team. Yet, instead of recognizing that leadership grows through adversity, the BCB opted for a quick fix. It is easy to forget that captaincy, like any craft, requires patience and support. It is in moments of crisis that great leaders are forged, but only if they are given the time and tools to rise again.

The Future: A Leadership Gamble

In the aftermath of Shakib’s removal, Mushfiqur Rahim is likely to take over the reins. While Rahim is an able cricketer with a sound mind for the game, one cannot help but wonder whether Bangladesh has lost more than it has gained. Shakib’s removal risks unsettling a team still finding its identity—one that needs both stability and inspiration. For a side with an average age hovering between 20 and 25, leadership is not merely about strategy; it’s about teaching young players how to handle fame, setbacks, and success with grace.

The board’s decision to sever Shakib’s tenure rather than repair it may leave long-lasting scars. When a cricket board acts impulsively, it risks not just the morale of the player in question but the collective spirit of the entire team. Leaders are not born—they are shaped. And in Shakib, Bangladesh had the raw material for greatness. With more measured intervention—a stern conversation, a public show of support, or a temporary demotion—the BCB could have addressed Shakib’s behavioural issues without dismantling his leadership.

A Missed Opportunity for Growth

Leadership in sports, like life, is about more than just performance. It is about navigating the highs and lows with resilience, humility, and wisdom. Shakib Al Hasan may have faltered off the field, but his potential as a leader remains untapped. The BCB’s decision to remove him as captain seems less a solution and more a missed opportunity—an opportunity to mould a young, talented cricketer into a long-term leader who could guide the team through future challenges. 

Time will tell whether the board’s gamble pays off. For now, one can only hope that this decision does not widen the rift between Shakib and the BCB beyond repair. Cricket, after all, is not just about runs and wickets; it is about the relationships that define a team’s journey. And in the case of Bangladesh, the story of Shakib Al Hasan may well become a cautionary tale—a reminder of what happens when talent is not met with trust and when potential is squandered in the name of discipline.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

The Triumph and Turmoil of Shakib Al Hasan: A Study in Arrogance and Aspiration

In the past week, the behaviour of Shakib Al Hasan—Bangladesh's greatest cricket icon—has ignited fervent discussions across the country. The media suggests that a change in captaincy is looming, but that, in itself, would only be a cosmetic fix for deeper structural issues. The problem demands introspection beyond the surface narrative. Bangladesh cricket faces a crisis of leadership, one intertwined with Shakib’s triumphs, flaws, and the system that shaped him.

The Rise: A Boy from Magura  

The cricketing world first noticed Shakib Al Hasan in 2009, a bright talent from Magura who ascended to the top of ICC’s ODI rankings and cemented his place among the finest Test bowlers. With both bat and ball, he proved to be Bangladesh's talisman, a player of rare mettle. He was more than a cricketer; he was the living embodiment of the nation’s cricketing ambition—a champion who brought legitimacy to Bangladesh's aspirations on the global stage.  

Shakib redefined the possibilities for Bangladeshi cricket. He advocated for a high-performance program to bridge the gap between domestic and international standards and lobbied for reforms in the country’s first-class structure. He has inspired by setting high standards, often critiquing himself harshly even after impressive performances. Yet, the charisma that catapulted him to stardom now finds itself in conflict with his demeanour off the field.  

The Flaws Beneath the Genius  

For all his brilliance, Shakib’s off-field antics have begun to erode his leadership aura. His clash with the selectors ahead of the Zimbabwe tour earlier this year revealed an alarming streak of arrogance. Labelling the selectors liars and barring former captain Habibul Bashar from the dressing room crossed boundaries of both professionalism and respect. He further antagonized the management by resisting the inclusion of Mohammad Ashraful on the Test side.  

Such behaviour not only strains team cohesion but also isolates Shakib himself. Despite individual brilliance, his aloofness diminishes his ability to inspire those around him. Leadership, after all, is more than scoring runs and taking wickets—it is about galvanizing a collective spirit.  

Shakib, now 24, finds himself in a precarious position, where his success seems to have bred complacency and entitlement. The trappings of fame—wealth, adulation, and influence—have swelled his ego. Yet arrogance, as history teaches, is a treacherous companion to talent.  

A System That Failed to Nurture Character  

The root of Shakib's arrogance may lie in a systemic failure—one that plagues much of Asian cricket. As Srinivasan Narayanan, a cricket analyst, aptly pointed out, "Asian cricket often encounters a double-edged weapon. Boards eagerly thrust young talent onto the international stage, but they neglect to establish mentoring systems to guide these athletes through success, failure, fame, and criticism."  

The absence of mentors for young cricketers like Shakib is glaring. His confrontations with Bashar exemplify the rift between generations that should ideally be building bridges, not barriers. In Bashar’s maturity lies an opportunity—an opportunity that has so far been wasted. It is not merely Shakib’s responsibility to reach out for guidance; it is equally incumbent upon the seniors to nurture him. Confabulation, not confrontation, should be the way forward.

The Need for Mentorship and Institutional Reform  

Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) must take urgent steps to address the deeper issue—a lack of mentorship and psychological support for young players. Systems must be put in place at the grassroots level to equip cricketers with life skills, teaching them to handle the pitfalls of success. Exposing them to the lives of legendary figures—Sachin Tendulkar, Imran Khan, Clive Lloyd, and Gary Sobers—can offer valuable lessons in humility, resilience, and leadership.  

Tendulkar’s restraint, Imran’s political astuteness, Lloyd’s unity-building, and Sobers' grace remain exemplars of how to wield influence without arrogance. These icons not only played the game at the highest level but also navigated success without losing sight of humility. Shakib must learn that talent alone is not enough—it is the ability to inspire through actions and attitude that defines true greatness.

The Path Forward: Not a Change, But a Challenge  

Calls for Shakib’s removal as captain are misguided. He remains Bangladesh’s finest cricketer and the most capable leader—if his energies can be redirected. Stripping him of captaincy would address only the symptoms, not the cause. Bangladesh cricket needs Shakib, but it also needs Shakib to evolve.  

The solution lies in remedial action, not rejection. A structured mentoring program, combined with regular psychological counselling, could help restore balance to his leadership. Shakib must rediscover the joy and responsibility that comes with leading a nation. As Bangladesh's cricketing torchbearer, he has the opportunity not just to lead but to redefine leadership for future generations.  

If Shakib’s arrogance is the problem, then the answer lies in guided introspection, not punishment. A great player is not one who never falls, but one who rises every time he does. Shakib has fallen—but he can rise again, not just as a cricketer, but as a leader who embodies grace, humility, and vision.  

Bangladesh cricket is at a crossroads. The time to act is now—not by changing the captain, but by changing the system that failed to nurture his spirit. Shakib Al Hasan remains the best man to lead the team. It is up to the BCB, the seniors, and Shakib himself to ensure that this opportunity for transformation is not squandered.  

Because in the final analysis, it isn’t merely about one player—it is about the future of Bangladesh cricket.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar