Cricket has always carried a moral mythology. It was meant to be the Gentleman’s Game, a sport where rivalry ended at the boundary rope and politics stopped at the pavilion door. That mythology is now collapsing. And when Nasser Hussain publicly questions the selective morality of global cricket governance, it is not an off-hand remark, it is an indictment.
Hussain’s intervention exposes an uncomfortable truth: international cricket is no longer governed by rules, reciprocity, or sporting ethics. It is governed by money, leverage, and fear. And at the center of this imbalance sits the Indian cricket establishment, operating with the confidence of a regime that knows it cannot be challenged.
What Nasser Hussain Really Said (and Why It Matters)
Hussain’s critique is devastating precisely because it is simple. He asks the question everyone in cricket whispers but no institution dares to confront:
Would the ICC ever punish India the way it punishes others?
By raising this hypothetical, Hussain unmasks the double standards of the International Cricket Council. Bangladesh and Pakistan face swift disciplinary consequences. India, by contrast, enjoys negotiated exceptions, “neutral venues,” and moral exemptions.
This is not leadership. It is immunity.
The IPL as a Political Weapon
The most chilling example is the quiet removal of Mustafizur Rahman from Kolkata Knight Riders. This was not an injury call. It was not a cricketing decision. It was a signal.
When a domestic franchise league becomes an instrument of geopolitical pressure, cricket crosses a red line. Players stop being professionals and become hostages to national mood swings. Hussain rightly identifies this as the moment when sport gave way to coercion.
In any democratic sporting order, a legally contracted international player cannot be removed because of diplomatic discomfort. In cricket’s current ecosystem, however, Indian domestic politics now outranks international sporting law.
The Illusion of “Cricket Diplomacy”
For decades, India projected cricket as a bridge, between nations, cultures, and conflicts. Today, that bridge has become a checkpoint.
Refused handshakes. Avoided trophy ceremonies. Matches cancelled not by weather or logistics, but by ideology. What Hussain calls “depressing” is in fact something more serious: the normalization of hostility inside the dressing room.
Cricket diplomacy once softened borders. Indian cricket now hardens them.
Power Without Responsibility
The Board of Control for Cricket in India, the Board of Control for Cricket in India, commands unparalleled financial power. With that power should come stewardship. Instead, it has produced domination without accountability.
The consequences are self-defeating:
Commercial erosion: No India–Pakistan rivalry means no global spectacle. Everyone loses.
Sporting insecurity: If Mustafizur can be discarded overnight, no overseas player is safe.
Moral decay: The message is clear, compliance is rewarded, independence is punished.
This is not hegemony with vision. It is control without consequence.
The ICC’s Moral Collapse
The ICC’s role in this drama is the most damning of all. By enforcing rules rigidly on weaker boards while bending endlessly for India, as seen repeatedly in tournament arrangements like the Asia Cup, the ICC has forfeited its claim to neutrality.
A governing body that cannot govern its most powerful member is not a regulator. It is a subcontractor.
In practice, global cricket now operates on an unspoken hierarchy: some members are equal, but one member is indispensable.
A Lonely Empire at the Top
If cricket continues down this road, India may well stand alone at the summit, financially dominant, politically unchecked, and competitively isolated. But it will be a hollow peak.
The beauty of cricket lies in its pluralism: Bangladesh’s rise, Pakistan’s unpredictability, the shared chaos of rivalry. Strip those away, and the game becomes a closed circuit, loud, lucrative, and spiritually empty.
Nasser Hussain did not attack India. He defended cricket.
The real question now is whether the game still has the courage to defend itself.
Thank You
Faisal Caesar
No comments:
Post a Comment