Mushfiqur Rahim at 100 Tests: The Relentless Craftsman Who Willed Bangladesh into Belonging

The childish celebration that spans for more than two decades - The cherubic smile that softened even the most exhausting days – The celebration with a roar and clenched fist. The long, meditative hours of batting practice under a punishing sun. These are the images that surface whenever the name Mushfiqur Rahim is uttered in Bangladesh cricket. They are not merely memories; they are fragments of a national journey—an epic told through the life of a cricketer who refused to surrender to history, circumstance, or mediocrity.

Now, as Mushfiqur becomes the first Bangladeshi to step into the rarefied company of 100 Test cricketers, his milestone demands more than celebration. It demands a reckoning with what he has symbolised: resilience in a cricket culture built on the uneasy coexistence of soaring dreams and cruel limitations.

Bangladesh has played 155 Tests in its 25-year history. Mushfiqur has featured in nearly two-thirds of them. That is not longevity; that is institutional memory.

A Career Forged in Adversity

When Mushfiqur Rahim first walked onto Lord’s in 2005, he looked startlingly young—almost child-like—set against the theatre of cricket’s most storied stage. His tiny frame and cautious smile contrasted violently with the four-pronged English pace attack poised to dismantle an inexperienced Bangladesh side. Yet he resisted. It was not a match-saving act, not even a noteworthy statistical contribution, but it contained something Bangladesh cricket desperately needed in those days: defiance.

Defiance from a team mocked for simply being present.

Defiance from a boy who could easily have been swallowed by the cynicism that enveloped Bangladesh cricket in those formative years.

Through the next two decades, that thread of resistance evolved into a science—a disciplined, almost monastic approach to preparation that became Mushfiqur’s signature. He was neither the most flamboyant nor the most naturally gifted, but he became the most dependable. And in a nation where sporting fragility has often been cultural, Mushfiqur’s discipline was radical.

The Last of a Generation

The modern pillars of Bangladesh cricket—Shakib Al Hasan, Mashrafe Mortaza, Tamim Iqbal, Mahmudullah—have all now faded from the arena. Yet Mushfiqur remains, not because he had fewer reasons to retire but because he had more reasons to keep going. When he quit T20Is and ODIs, whispers grew louder that he was nearing the end. Mushfiqur instead treated the speculation as an indictment of his work ethic.

He responded the only way he knows: with runs, with fitness, with sweat, with monastic routine.

At 38, he is still in the “why retire?” phase of his journey—an astonishing mindset in a cricket culture that has historically lacked long-term athletic conditioning, infrastructure, or continuity.

The Arc of a Craftsman

Mushfiqur’s career has not been smooth—it has been sculpted. He entered Test cricket with technical flaws, fought through years of inconsistency, and rebuilt himself. Coaches like Dav Whatmore and Jamie Siddons tinkered with his backlift, his pull shot, and his game against pace. Tamim recalls that the raw talent was never the story; the story was the work ethic. Mushfiqur made himself.

He did so under difficult conditions: a brittle batting order, a domestic structure still learning how to behave like a Test system, and a national expectation perpetually oscillating between premature hope and volatile disappointment.

His double-hundred in Galle in 2013—Bangladesh’s first—was not just a statistical milestone; it felt like an emancipation. Mominul Haque, who debuted in that match, remembers it as a watershed, an innings that allowed younger batters to believe that Bangladesh could dream beyond survival.

That was the year Mushfiqur turned the corner. His average leapt past 50, his discipline matured, and his role crystallised: he became Bangladesh’s immovable spine.

Captain, Keeper, Workhorse

Few cricketers anywhere have carried a national team the way Mushfiqur has.

He captained 34 Tests.

He kept wicket in 55.

He combined both roles in 28 matches—second only to MS Dhoni in Test history.

And he still averaged over 41 as captain.

When he finally relinquished the gloves in 2019, his batting blossomed further. The numbers reveal the story of a cricketer who aged like a craftsman, not an athlete: smarter, calmer, technically tighter, more self-assured.

Since 2013, Mushfiqur has averaged over 42 in 69 Tests—the only Bangladeshi batter with a 40+ average over that period.

The Traveller in a Land of Two-Test Series

There is a peculiar tragedy in Mushfiqur’s career. Had he been Australian, English, or Indian, he might have played 150 or even 180 Tests. Instead, Bangladesh’s limited fixture list forced his career into a series of compressed, under-resourced, two-match tours. Yet, within those constraints, he carved out achievements that rival global greats:

Three Test double-centuries — the most by any wicketkeeper-batter in history.

Hundreds in six countries.

Bangladesh’s highest away average among top-order batters.

Involved in five of the team’s six partnerships exceeding 250 runs.

A balls-per-dismissal ratio of 78.6 — the toughest Bangladeshi batter to dislodge.

He was not merely a participant in Bangladesh’s story; he was the axis around which its Test evolution rotated.

The Human Behind the Legend

The milestone Test brought emotional truths to the surface. In the team huddle before his 100th match, he told his teammates something revealing and profoundly un-Bangladeshi in its humility:

“Mushfiqur Rahim exists because of Bangladesh. I am just a drop in the ocean.”

He dedicated his century in that match—he became only the eleventh cricketer in history to score a hundred in his 100th Test—to his grandparents, who once confessed they wished to live long enough to watch him bat.

These gestures strip away the statistical armour and expose the emotional engine that has powered this journey: gratitude, duty, and a sense of national responsibility that is rare in modern cricket.

A Legacy Beyond the Scorebook

Mushfiqur Rahim is more than the sum of his runs or the longevity of his career. He is the embodiment of Bangladesh’s slow, painful, stubborn rise into Test relevance. He represents an entire generation that learned to endure humiliation, absorb defeat, and still imagine a better cricketing tomorrow.

He is proof that greatness in Bangladesh cricket is not something inherited; it is something engineered.

As he looks ahead to yet another Test series—Pakistan at home next April—he leaves the future deliberately ambiguous. Perhaps he doesn’t need to plan too far. Legends rarely do. Their careers do not end; they taper into memory, into habit, into cultural inheritance.

In a cricket world structured against the small and unfashionable, Mushfiqur Rahim stood only five feet tall but stood tall enough for all of Bangladesh.

And perhaps that is the true meaning of his 100th Test: not a milestone, but a metaphor for a nation that learned—through him—how to stay, resist, and finally belong.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Mushfiqur Rahim: The Relentless Constant in Bangladesh’s Cricketing Story

Coming in with Bangladesh in trouble is nothing new for Mushfiqur Rahim. It’s a role he’s embraced since he was a teenager in 2005 — his boyish face and disarming smile belying the grit beneath, the grit of a cricketer who has spent two decades cushioning the tremors of Bangladesh’s batting collapses like a sponge soaking pressure.

That pressure became familiar long before it became routine.

Rahim arrived at a time of strategic upheaval in Bangladesh cricket. In 2005, the selectors — led by a visionary think tank comprising Dav Whatmore, Steve McInnes, and Arafat Rahman — made an audacious call to build for the future. Out went the old guard, despite the criticism of so-called "paid experts"; in came a clutch of raw, untested youth, among whom Mushfiqur was the cornerstone.

That decision would, with time, prove inspired.

A Productive Partnership 

Fast forward to Galle in 2025. Najmul Hossain Shanto had just faced three deliveries when Mushfiqur walked in at 45 for 3 — a precarious yet familiar scenario. On his sixth ball, Shanto danced down the track and lofted one over the bowler’s head, signalling intent. It wasn’t reckless aggression, but a calm defiance. It was as though the innings had inhaled new air.

Despite a pitch that looked flatter than usual on Day 1, Bangladesh resisted the urge to accelerate. Galle demands respect, not bravado. Bat first, bat long. That has long been the script.

Sri Lanka, buoyed by Angelo Mathews’ farewell and Tharindu Rathnayake’s dream debut (including a double-strike in consecutive overs), might have imagined a different story unfolding. But they hadn’t accounted for Mushfiqur and Shanto’s poise.

The pair weathered the storm, punished loose deliveries, and ran with urgency. By lunch on Day 2, Bangladesh had crossed 400. The duo's partnership had swelled to 247 runs — both unbeaten, Shanto on 136, Mushfiqur on 105.

It was Mushfiqur’s 12th Test century, ending a 14-innings drought. And yet, this was no free ride. Dhananjaya de Silva rotated the field shrewdly. Sri Lanka’s bowlers probed, particularly targeting Mushfiqur’s patience. He survived 23 balls in the nineties before nudging into three figures in the 86th over.

For Shanto, it was a return to rhythm — his first Test ton since November 2023. For Mushfiqur, it was a full-circle moment in Galle, where 12 years ago he etched his name in Bangladesh’s history books with the team’s first Test double-century.

A Career of Two Halves

Rahim’s career has been, in many ways, a study in duality.

He debuted before MS Dhoni, Kevin Pietersen, Michael Hussey, and Alastair Cook. Nearly two decades later, he remains the last man standing from the Class of 2005 in active Test cricket. And yet, he has rarely been named in conversations about the greats of the modern era. That is both a disservice and an inevitability.

The first half of his career was marked by promise without potency — 12 Tests in, he averaged under 20. His first Test hundred came in 2010 against India. The next arrived three years later. By the end of 2015, Rahim’s average had clawed its way to 32.31 — decent, but not dazzling.

And then came the pivot.

2017 marked a seismic shift. In Wellington, alongside Shakib Al Hasan, Rahim stitched together a record-breaking 359-run partnership against a formidable New Zealand attack. His 159 — the highest by an Asian wicketkeeper in a SENA country — heralded a new chapter. From that point on, Rahim transformed into one of the most consistent Test performers of his generation.

Since that Wellington innings, he has amassed 3,410 runs in 47 Tests at an average of 44.86. Only four players globally have scored more at a higher average during this span. Rahim’s numbers have outstripped Virat Kohli (44.43), Usman Khawaja (44.35), and Babar Azam (43.82) in that period — a stunning metric for a man often left out of elite lists.

And yet, perception lags behind reality.

Limited by Circumstance, Not by Skill

Rahim’s ascent has been constrained by the asymmetries of Test cricket. He has played only 14 Tests in SENA countries, averaging 21.92. Six of those came after 2017 — two in New Zealand, where he averaged 94.50, and four in South Africa, where he struggled at 19. No Tests in England or Australia since 2016. Even in Bangladesh, SENA opposition has been sporadic.

That uneven exposure has distorted the perception of Rahim’s quality. The weight given to performances in SENA countries remains the litmus test for batting greatness. And Rahim has had neither the platform nor the privileges to make that case fully.

What he has done is maximize every controllable within his grasp.

Since 2017, his home and away averages are strikingly consistent: 43.93 and 46.15. His centuries span the globe — from Galle to Rawalpindi, Hyderabad to Wellington. At home, he has flourished: three unbeaten scores over 175, including two double centuries. Since 2020, his Test average of 46.42 eclipses Steve Smith’s 46.17 — a quiet, almost ironic, footnote in cricket's statistical archives.

A Legacy Cast in Grit, Not Glamour

Rahim has always been a cricketer's cricketer. Understated. Uncelebrated. Yet unmistakably elite. His skill against spin is matched by few. His glove work may have often taken a back seat to his batting, but it was never unworthy. In hindsight, had he relinquished the gloves earlier, he might have soared higher with the bat. But Rahim chose devotion over convenience.

He has been criticized for wearing his heart on his sleeve — sometimes too tightly. The emotional strain of carrying Bangladesh’s middle order and the added burden of wicketkeeping may have exacted a toll. But that emotional core also fuelled his longevity, his resilience, and his quiet dominance.

Mushfiqur Rahim will perhaps never be counted among the pantheon of global greats. But within the context of Bangladesh cricket — and indeed, the global narrative of undervalued brilliance — he stands tall.

Not every great player makes headlines. Some, like Rahim, make history — quietly, persistently, and with unwavering grace.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Bangladesh Triumphs in Rawalpindi: A Historic Win Amid Political Turmoil and Tragedy

The political landscape in Bangladesh has rarely resembled a calm river, especially over the past 15 years under a repressive regime. Protests and chaos have become almost normative, with student demands—such as those surrounding the controversial quota system—often dismissed as fleeting moments. However, the situation escalated violently following inflammatory remarks from former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, revealing the deep-seated tensions within the country.

Under Hasina’s directives, law enforcement and factions of the Awami League pointed weapons at peaceful protesters, leading to horrific bloodshed that did not even spare a four-year-old child. The violence persisted until early August when the Bangladesh Army intervened in a bid for peace. Ultimately, Hasina fled to India, and on August 5, 2024, Bangladeshis took to the streets, celebrating their newfound independence after a prolonged period of oppression.

Tragically, reports indicate that between July 16 and August 16, 2024, 624 lives were lost—354 before Hasina’s resignation, with 66 of the deceased being children. A United Nations investigation later confirmed that at least 650 people had been killed, with over 20,000 injured and more than 11,000 arrested across the nation. The gruesome imagery shared on social media after a seven-day internet blackout left the populace stunned, exposing the brutal reality of Hasina’s regime. The names of martyrs—Abu Sayed, Mir Mugdho, Shaykh Ashhabul Yamin, and others—became synonymous with the struggle against tyranny.

While some Awami League supporters remained silent amidst the massacre, a larger segment joined the student-led movement, ultimately propelling the quest for freedom forward. The struggle for democracy has never been easy in Bangladesh, especially with fascist elements attempting counter-revolutions and external supporters rallying behind the oppressive regime. Compounding the nation’s struggles, a devastating flash flood struck, triggered by the opening of the Damburu Dam in Tripura.

Against this chaotic backdrop, the Bangladesh Cricket Team embarked on a bilateral series in Pakistan. The nation, preoccupied with aiding flood victims, paid little heed to the cricketing spectacle. Yet, amid turmoil, the team displayed remarkable resilience. On Day 1, after a delayed start due to wet conditions, the Bangladeshi bowlers initially had the Pakistani batsmen on the ropes. However, the home side eventually countered, declaring their innings with a strong performance.

By Day 3, Shadman Islam’s patient 93 laid the groundwork, supported by half-centuries from Mominul Haque, Mushfiqur Rahim, and Litton Das. Bangladesh entered the final stretch at 132 runs adrift of Pakistan’s first innings total, with Mushfiqur and Litton forming a crucial partnership. On Day 4, Mushfiqur’s masterful 191 shifted the momentum, showcasing a blend of caution and aggression that was essential for a team still recovering from the July atrocities.

The pitch at Rawalpindi, predictably flat, suggested a dull draw. Yet the Bangladeshi pacers, along with spinners Mehidy Hasan Miraz and the controversial Shakib Al Hasan—who faced scrutiny for his past political affiliations—turned the tables against the odds. Hasan Mahmud applied relentless pressure, while Nahid Rana’s express pace jolted the Pakistani lineup. Shakib and Miraz exploited the conditions expertly, with the spinners posting remarkable figures: Mehidy claimed 5 for 101, and Shakib took 4 for 144.

In a historic turn of events, Bangladesh bowled Pakistan out cheaply, requiring just 30 runs for a momentous victory. Zakir Hasan and Shadman Islam sealed the win, with Zakir striking the winning runs, making history as Pakistan faced a ten-wicket defeat at home in a Test match for the first time.

In a poignant gesture, Bangladesh skipper Najmul Hossain dedicated the victory to the martyrs of the July Massacre. Before the Test, he expressed confidence, stating, “Records can change. It won't be easy for Pakistan. We have a balanced side. We believe we can do special things this time.” Indeed, the records shifted as the Bangladeshi flag soared high in Rawalpindi, symbolizing a nation's resilience.

Focusing on cricket amid such turmoil was a monumental challenge, yet the Tigers channelled their adversities into motivation, determined to uplift a nation still grappling with the aftermath of political upheaval and natural disasters. This victory was not merely a sporting triumph; it represented a collective sigh of relief, a moment of hope, and a reaffirmation of the spirit of a nation that had endured much but refused to be subdued.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

 

 

Mushfiqur Rahim and Litton Das: Architects of a Historic Comeback

On Day 1 of the second Test between Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, the Mirpur crowd witnessed a remarkable tale of resilience and grit. As Mushfiqur Rahim and Litton Das joined forces at the crease, Bangladesh's hopes seemed buried under the rubble of a catastrophic start. The duo, however, turned the tide in a fashion reminiscent of the legendary Wallis Mathias and Shujauddin, who orchestrated a similar rescue act for Pakistan against the West Indies in Dhaka back in 1959.

A Precarious Beginning

Bangladesh's innings began under ominous clouds, not of weather but of expectation and fragility. Kasun Rajitha and Asitha Fernando, exploiting the early assistance from the pitch, delivered a devastating opening salvo. Within seven overs, the scoreboard read a dismal 24/5. Mahmudul Hasan Joy, Nazmul Hasan Shanto, Shakib Al Hasan, Tamim Iqbal, and Mominul Haque all fell prey to incisive seam bowling. Rajitha's precision and Fernando's sharp movement left Bangladesh teetering on the brink of humiliation.

The Context: Pressure on Mushfiqur and Litton

Mushfiqur Rahim entered the series under immense scrutiny. His recent scores—5, 48, 12, 5, 7, 0, 51, and 1—painted the picture of a batter struggling to find his rhythm. Criticized for his shot selection and emotional outbursts, Mushfiqur needed a performance that would reaffirm his status as Bangladesh's premier batter.

Litton Das, too, bore the brunt of public ire. Once derided by fans and even mocked by corporate advertisements, he had recently emerged as Bangladesh's most improved batter. With his technique and temperament honed over the past year, Litton was ready to silence his detractors.

The Partnership: A Study in Contrasts

Faced with adversity, Mushfiqur and Litton crafted a partnership that was as much about survival as it was about dominance. Mushfiqur anchored one end with stoic determination, curbing his penchant for risky strokes like the reverse sweep. Litton, on the other hand, counterattacked with flair, forcing Sri Lankan skipper Dimuth Karunaratne to adopt defensive field placements.

The duo saw off the new ball, blunting the seamers' early threat. After lunch, Litton showcased his mastery against short-pitched bowling, repeatedly pulling and cutting Fernando with authority. Against spin, he was equally commanding, driving and sweeping with precision. Mushfiqur, meanwhile, grew in confidence, stepping out to punish overpitched deliveries and rotating the strike with ease.

Records Tumble

Their partnership of 272 runs for the sixth wicket became a landmark in Test cricket. It was the highest stand ever recorded after a team had lost five wickets for 25 runs or fewer. Litton’s 141, a masterpiece of controlled aggression, was the highest score by a number seven batter in such dire circumstances, surpassing Moin Khan’s 117 against Sri Lanka in 1995.

Mushfiqur’s innings, a masterclass in endurance and technique, culminated in an unbeaten 175. His partnership with Taijul Islam added a further 49 runs, frustrating Sri Lanka’s bowlers and pushing Bangladesh to a total of 365. This score set a new record as the highest by any team in first-class cricket where six or more batters were dismissed for ducks. The previous best was Derbyshire's 300 in 2021.

A Comeback for the Ages

Bangladesh’s performance was not merely a statistical marvel but a testament to the indomitable spirit of its players. The innings transformed a potential debacle into a story of resilience, skill, and determination. Mushfiqur’s disciplined approach and Litton’s audacious strokeplay complemented each other perfectly, creating a blueprint for batting under pressure.

As the Mirpur crowd erupted in applause, the partnership between Mushfiqur Rahim and Litton Das etched itself into the annals of cricketing history. It was not just a fightback; it was a statement. Bangladesh, a team often familiar with the sting of collapse, had turned despair into triumph, proving once again that in cricket, as in life, comebacks are always possible.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Mirpur Test: Nothing New as Run-fest Dominates

The one-off Test series against Zimbabwe was positioned as an opportunity for Bangladesh's faltering batting line-up to regain its composure, particularly after they struggled against stronger teams like India, and Pakistan, and the surprising defeat to Afghanistan. The match was seen as a chance to rebuild confidence, and by the third day, it had evolved into a showcase of Bangladesh's batting prowess, with the Zimbabwean bowlers left powerless in the face of a relentless onslaught.

From the outset, it was clear that the Zimbabwean attack lacked the necessary venom to trouble the Bangladeshi batters. After claiming the third wicket, they failed to adjust their lines or lengths, nor did they exploit the conditions to their advantage. The overnight not-out pair of Mushfiqur Rahim and Mominul Haque seized the opportunity, building a monumental 222-run partnership for the fourth wicket. Mominul, who had promised a big score before the match, delivered with a composed knock, while Mushfiq batted with the assurance of a man in complete control, extending Bangladesh's lead to a commanding 295 before the declaration.

This innings marked Bangladesh’s second-highest first-innings lead, following their record 397-run advantage against the West Indies in 2018. It was an innings characterized by ease and elegance, where the need for precision in back lift, footwork, or defence seemed almost redundant. The drives, cuts, and pulls flowed effortlessly through the onside, cover, and point regions, with each stroke lifting the confidence of the batters. Mominul’s assured century was a testament to his temperament, while Mushfiq's double century, his third in Test cricket (two of which have come against Zimbabwe), underlined his dominance. It was a curious situation, however, that Mushfiq would not feature in the upcoming Karachi Test. Perhaps, in hindsight, it would have been beneficial for Bangladesh to include Mahmudullah Riyad in the squad, offering him the chance to regain his form against such a toothless attack.

Mushfiq’s innings was a masterclass in boundary-hitting, with each milestone – fifty, hundred, hundred and fifty, and double century – marked by exquisite shots through the point region or gliding past the gully. Zimbabwe’s decision to leave the third-man area open for long stretches seemed an odd tactical choice, further compounding their struggles. Liton Kumar Das also joined the run feast, contributing a half-century to the growing total.

The day unfolded as little more than an exhibition match, with Bangladesh batting Zimbabwe out of contention. The Zimbabwean bowlers, bereft of ideas, were unable to mount any serious resistance. As the day drew to a close, Bangladesh had not only established a commanding lead but had also put Zimbabwe on the back foot with two quick wickets in the final overs of the day. With the game firmly in their control, Bangladesh appeared poised to wrap up the match on Day 4 – barring any intervention from the weather or an unlikely display of defiance from the Zimbabwean batsmen.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar  

Mushfiqur Rahim’s Milestone Amidst Bangladesh’s Test Cricket Conundrum

The second day of the second Test between Bangladesh and Zimbabwe at Mirpur belonged to Mushfiqur Rahim—a diminutive yet dynamic figure whose bat spoke volumes in an arena where Bangladesh often struggles to assert dominance. Mushfiqur’s masterful double hundred, a feat etched into the annals of cricket history, underscored his ability to rise above mediocrity. Yet, the broader narrative of Bangladesh’s Test cricket—riddled with tactical inertia and individual priorities—remains a story of missed opportunities and unfulfilled potential. 

Mushfiqur’s Record-Breaking Feat 

Patient and composed, Mushfiqur navigated the Zimbabwean attack with precision, becoming the first wicketkeeper in Test history to notch two double centuries. His marathon innings of 421 balls, spanning 589 minutes, broke records and solidified his place in an elite club of batsmen—including Sir Don Bradman, George Headley, and Brian Lara—who have twice rewritten their country’s highest individual Test scores. 

While Mushfiqur’s innings offered a masterclass in endurance and technique, it also highlighted a recurring theme in subcontinental cricket: the prioritization of personal milestones over team strategy. With Bangladesh in a commanding position, a more aggressive approach could have hastened a declaration, granting the bowlers more time to dismantle Zimbabwe. 

The Need for Tactical Clarity 

Bangladesh’s primary objective should have been to maximize their chances of forcing a result. The pitch, showing signs of uneven bounce, provided an opportunity to unsettle Zimbabwe early. However, the extended wait for Mushfiqur’s double century—and Mehidy Hasan’s half-century—meant precious time was squandered. Captain Mahmudullah Riyad’s eventual declaration left the bowlers just 18 overs to test the Zimbabwean batsmen, yielding only one wicket. 

This cautious approach, while understandable in certain contexts, seemed misaligned with the team’s overarching goal of securing a decisive victory. If Zimbabwe’s batsmen dig in during subsequent sessions, the slow passages of play on Day 2 might come back to haunt Bangladesh. 

Mahmudullah’s Struggles and Leadership Prospects 

For Mahmudullah Riyad, this Test series represents more than just another cricketing assignment. With Shakib Al Hasan unavailable and seemingly reluctant to commit to Test cricket, Mahmudullah has emerged as a candidate for long-term leadership in the format. Yet, his own form with the bat raises serious concerns. 

In 2018, Mahmudullah’s Test performances have been underwhelming. Across six matches, he has amassed just 169 runs at an average of 21.13, with a solitary unbeaten 83 on a batting-friendly Chattogram pitch against Sri Lanka. His recent scores—0, 4, 0, 16, 36, 28, 17, 6, 0, and 15—paint a grim picture of a batsman grappling with technical deficiencies and a lack of confidence. 

Mahmudullah’s vulnerabilities against both pace and spin have become glaringly apparent. Against pacers, he struggles to move his feet effectively and often pokes at deliveries outside off-stump, a recurring pattern in his dismissals. Against spinners, his approach has been erratic—alternating between reckless sweeps and poorly judged advances down the track. His dismissal on Day 2, caught behind off a delivery moving away from off-stump, epitomized a batsman out of rhythm and ideas. 

A Call for Redemption 

Despite his lean patch, Mahmudullah’s reputation as a hardworking cricketer offers hope. To justify his role as a linchpin in the batting order and a prospective captain, he must confront his technical shortcomings with urgency and determination. Refining his footwork, rediscovering the art of leaving deliveries outside off-stump, and adopting a measured approach against spin will be crucial to his resurgence. 

More importantly, Mahmudullah needs to lead by example. A captain’s form often sets the tone for the team, and his ability to rise above adversity could inspire his teammates to follow suit. 

Conclusion 

Mushfiqur Rahim’s double century was a moment of individual brilliance that illuminated an otherwise complex picture of Bangladesh’s Test cricket. While the innings showcased the potential of Bangladeshi batsmen to excel in the longest format, it also highlighted the need for greater tactical acumen and team-oriented thinking. 

As for Mahmudullah, the road ahead demands introspection and transformation. His struggles reflect not just his personal challenges but also the broader inconsistencies that plague Bangladesh’s Test cricket. To elevate the team’s standing in the format, Mahmudullah must rise to the occasion—not just as a batsman, but as a leader who embodies resilience and vision. 

In the end, Test cricket remains the ultimate measure of a team’s mettle. For Bangladesh, the path to redemption lies in embracing this challenge with renewed vigour, discipline, and a collective commitment to excellence.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Why Do I Watch Cricket? The Courage, Commitment, and Stories That Transcend the Game

 I have often asked myself: why do I watch cricket? The answer has evolved over time. Initially, it was sheer passion—a raw and unrelenting love for the game. But as I delved deeper, I realized passion alone cannot sustain a lifelong connection with a sport. 

Cricket, like life, is a tapestry woven with threads of intelligence, skill, and courage. To truly fall in love with the game, one must appreciate how these elements converge to create moments that transcend the boundaries of the sport itself. Among these, courage often stands out as the defining trait that elevates cricket from a mere contest to a theatre of human resilience and spirit. 

Courage Under Fire: The Centenary Test of 1977

The Centenary Test of 1977 at the Melbourne Cricket Ground epitomized the courage cricket demands. It was a gladiatorial contest dominated by fiery fast bowlers like Dennis Lillee, Max Walker, Bob Willis, and Chris Old. The stakes were high, the egos massive, and the atmosphere electric. 

Amid this cauldron of pressure, Rick McCosker, Australia’s opener, suffered a brutal blow to the jaw from a Bob Willis bouncer. His jaw fractured, and McCosker was forced to retire hurt, leaving Australia with one less batsman for the second innings. Yet, in a moment that has since become folklore, McCosker returned to the crease, his face swathed in bandages, to add a crucial 54-run partnership with Rodney Marsh. 

The sight of McCosker, battered but unbroken, galvanized his team. His courage was contagious, inspiring his teammates to fight tooth and nail. Lillee, embodying the same indomitable spirit, ensured McCosker’s bravery did not go in vain. Australia won the Test by the same margin as the first-ever Test in 1877—a fitting tribute to the game’s enduring spirit. 

Courage in Modern Cricket: Tamim Iqbal’s One-Handed Heroics

Cricket’s history is replete with such tales of courage, but few resonate more with Bangladeshi fans than Tamim Iqbal’s unforgettable act of bravery during the 2018 Asia Cup. 

Bangladesh was in disarray against Sri Lanka, their innings teetering on the brink of collapse. Tamim, struck on the wrist by a vicious Suranga Lakmal bouncer, was forced to retire hurt. His injury was severe enough to rule him out of the tournament. Yet, as Bangladesh’s innings neared its end, with only one wicket in hand and three overs to play, Tamim walked out to bat—this time with one hand. 

The image of Tamim, his left hand bandaged and rendered useless, standing at the crease was a testament to the courage that cricket so often demands. His presence was not about scoring runs but about making a statement: that no matter how dire the circumstances, commitment and courage can inspire a team to rise above adversity. 

Tamim’s selfless act ignited something extraordinary in Mushfiqur Rahim. Until that point, Mushfiq had batted with composure, building partnerships and anchoring the innings. But with Tamim at the other end, Mushfiq switched gears, unleashing a ferocious onslaught that added 32 runs in the final three overs. His unbeaten 144 not only rescued Bangladesh from the brink but also left Sri Lanka psychologically shattered. 

The Anatomy of Courage in Cricket

What compels a cricketer to risk personal injury for the team’s cause? Courage in cricket is not merely about physical bravery; it is a complex interplay of mental fortitude, selflessness, and an unwavering commitment to the team. 

Rick McCosker’s return to the crease in 1977 and Tamim Iqbal’s one-handed stand in 2018 share a common thread: they were acts of defiance against fear and adversity. They were moments that transcended individual glory, becoming symbols of collective resilience and inspiration. 

In Tamim’s case, his act silenced critics who had previously questioned his commitment. For years, his laid-back demeanour had drawn scepticism, but that night, he redefined himself in the eyes of his countrymen. His courage was not just about facing Lakmal’s bouncers but about lifting the spirit of a beleaguered team. 

The Heart of the Game

Why do I watch cricket? Because it offers stories like these—stories of courage that inspire, of intelligence that fascinates, and of skill that leaves one in awe. Cricket is not just a game of runs and wickets; it is a celebration of the human spirit, a stage where the extraordinary emerges from the ordinary. 

As Bangladesh triumphed over Sri Lanka that night, it was not just a victory on the scoreboard but a triumph of courage and commitment. It was a reminder that in cricket, as in life, adversity is not the end but the beginning of something remarkable. 

Tamim Iqbal’s one-handed stand and Mushfiqur Rahim’s heroic innings encapsulated the essence of cricket: a game where courage and commitment can turn the tide, where the improbable becomes possible, and where the human spirit shines brightest under the most challenging circumstances.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Tale of Pressure and Planning: Mushfiqur Rahim and Bangladesh’s Battle with Close Finishes

The departure of Shakib Al Hasan in the 30th over of a crucial ODI left Mushfiqur Rahim and Mahmudullah Riyad to shoulder the responsibility of the chase. What followed was a masterclass in middle-order batting, as the duo orchestrated an 87-run partnership that seemed poised to script yet another memorable victory for Bangladesh. 

This stand was not about Tamim Iqbal’s uncharacteristic caution or Shakib’s calculated restraint. Instead, it was a display of tactical acceleration—relying on deft touches, strike rotation, and occasional boundaries to keep the asking rate within reach. With every run, the West Indian bowlers appeared increasingly bereft of ideas, while their captain, Jason Holder, looked on helplessly as the match slipped away. 

Bangladesh’s asking rate escalated as the innings progressed, but the confidence and poise of Mushfiqur and Mahmudullah made it feel like the game was theirs to lose. And lose it they did, in a heart-stopping finale that epitomized Bangladesh’s recurring struggles in close encounters. 

The Turning Point: A Run-Out and a Risk

Mahmudullah’s untimely run-out brought Sabbir Rahman to the crease. Together with Mushfiqur, Sabbir began to complement the latter’s aggression. The chase seemed firmly under control until Keemo Paul dismissed Sabbir in the final ball of the penultimate over, leaving Bangladesh needing eight runs from the last six balls. 

With Mushfiqur Rahim—the team’s most experienced finisher—still at the crease, the equation seemed manageable. Memories of his match-winning exploits against India in the Asia Cup six years ago resurfaced, filling fans with cautious optimism. But cricket, as always, had its own script. 

The Final Over: A Moment of Misjudgment

Jason Holder’s first delivery of the last over was a full toss—an error that should have been punished with clinical precision. Instead, Mushfiqur opted for a glory stroke, aiming to seal the match with flair. The ball soared towards the midwicket region, his favoured area, but instead of crossing the boundary, it found the fielder’s hands. 

It was a soft dismissal, one that even Holder seemed surprised by. Mushfiqur’s strength—his ability to target the midwicket region—had once again proved to be his undoing. The West Indies clung to a narrow three-run victory, and Bangladesh was left to rue yet another lost opportunity. 

A Pattern of Heartbreaks

The critics and fans were unforgiving, citing a litany of similar instances where Mushfiqur had faltered under pressure. Captain Tamim Iqbal’s post-match remarks captured the collective frustration: 

“It is not the first time we have lost a close encounter. It has happened quite a few times in the recent past. It is very disappointing that we are not learning from our mistakes. We should have finished the game easily, but unfortunately, we could not.”

At the centre of this recurring narrative is Mushfiqur Rahim—a player celebrated for his skill but increasingly scrutinized for his decision-making in critical moments. 

The Missing Ingredient: Planning Under Pressure

Why does Bangladesh, and Mushfiqur in particular, crumble under pressure so often? The answer lies not merely in temperament but in the art of planning. 

Michael Bevan, one of the greatest finishers in ODI history, once attributed his success to meticulous planning and disciplined execution. Bevan emphasized the importance of understanding the match situation, adapting to the conditions, and making calculated decisions. 

“Even when it looks hard to score, it’s about being disciplined and carrying out your plans. One of my goals was to be there till the end. If I was there till the end, we would win more matches than we lost.” 

The operative word here is “planning.” Bevan’s approach was not about heroics but about calculated strategy—choosing the right ball, playing to his strengths, and remaining adaptable to the game’s evolving demands. 

Where Mushfiqur Fell Short

In the final moments of this match, Mushfiqur appeared to abandon the very discipline that had brought him so close to victory. Rather than continuing the steady accumulation of runs, he opted for a high-risk shot that defied the situational demands. 

Perhaps he believed the hard work was already done, that no further planning was required. But cricket is an unforgiving game, where a single misjudgment can undo an innings of brilliance. Mushfiqur’s decision to go for the glory stroke, rather than sticking to his established rhythm, cost Bangladesh the match. 

Lessons for the Future

This loss is not just a missed opportunity but a stark reminder of the importance of mental fortitude and strategic clarity in high-pressure situations. For Mushfiqur, it is an opportunity to introspect and refine his approach. For Bangladesh as a team, it underscores the need to cultivate a culture of adaptability and resilience. 

The path to becoming a consistent finisher, as Bevan demonstrated, lies in the ability to stay calm, assess the situation, and make the right decisions—even when the stakes are at their highest. Bangladesh’s journey in cricket has been marked by flashes of brilliance and moments of heartbreak. The challenge now is to learn from these experiences and ensure that close finishes become victories, not regrets. 

In the end, cricket is as much a mental game as it is a physical one. And for Mushfiqur Rahim, the next step in his evolution as a player lies in mastering the mind.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Crisis of Commitment and a Flicker of Redemption: Bangladesh Cricket’s Mixed Fortunes

 

A few days ago, the President of the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) dropped a bombshell that sent shockwaves through the cricketing fraternity. In a candid interaction with the press, Nazmul Hassan alleged that senior players Shakib Al Hasan and Mustafizur Rahman were reluctant to play Test cricket. The revelation stunned reporters and reverberated across the nation, leaving fans and critics grappling with disbelief. 

In a democratic world, personal choice is sacrosanct. Yet, for professional athletes, individual preferences often collide with the greater responsibility of representing their nation. Shakib and Mustafiz, under their exceptional talent, have become icons of Bangladesh cricket. However, it is Test cricket—the sport’s most demanding and prestigious format—that has elevated Shakib to global stardom and holds the potential to do the same for Mustafiz. 

The timing of Nazmul Hassan’s statement could not have been worse. Coming on the heels of a humiliating Test series defeat against the West Indies, it further fueled doubts about the commitment and temperament of Bangladesh’s senior players. The Tigers’ spineless performances raised uncomfortable questions about their dedication to the format. While defeats are part of the game, losing without a semblance of fight is a bitter pill for fans to swallow. 

A Ray of Hope in Guyana

Just as the shadow of doubt began to engulf Bangladesh cricket, the team produced a morale-boosting victory in Guyana. The triumph, though not flawless, temporarily lifted the gloom and provided a glimmer of hope for the Tigers’ faithful. 

At the toss, West Indies captain Jason Holder expressed little concern over losing, confident that the dampness in the pitch would dissipate as the match progressed. Bangladesh’s innings began with Tamim Iqbal and Shakib Al Hasan adopting a cautious approach, their grafting partnership laying a foundation that begged for acceleration in the latter stages. 

However, it was Mushfiqur Rahim who rose to the occasion, crafting a masterful innings that demonstrated the ideal approach to batting on the surface. His knock was a blueprint of controlled aggression, transforming a middling total into a competitive one. Bangladesh finished just shy of 250—a score that, while not imposing, was defendable with disciplined bowling and fielding. 

The Bowlers Step Up

Defending the target, Bangladesh’s bowlers faced the daunting task of containing a West Indies batting lineup known for its explosive power. Mashrafe Bin Mortaza led from the front, exploiting the home side’s lack of intent with a display of guile and precision. 

While Mashrafe excelled, the rest of the attack delivered mixed performances. Mehidy Hasan Miraz and Mosaddek Hossain provided valuable support, but Shakib and Rubel Hossain struggled with their lengths, and Mustafizur Rahman appeared erratic in his early spells before regaining control towards the end. 

The West Indies’ batting effort was uncharacteristically subdued, resembling a rudderless ship adrift at sea. Their top and middle order faltered, failing to replicate the heroics of earlier matches on the same pitch. This lacklustre display ultimately handed Bangladesh a much-needed victory. 

A Fragile Redemption

While the win in Guyana offers a respite, it does not erase the underlying issues plaguing Bangladesh cricket. The doubts about the team’s consistency and commitment remain. Success, as the adage goes, has many fathers, but failure is an orphan. The Tigers’ ability to sustain the momentum from this victory will determine whether this was a turning point or merely a fleeting moment of relief. 

Bangladesh cricket stands at a crossroads. The reluctance of senior players to commit to Test cricket is a symptom of deeper structural and cultural challenges. The BCB must address these issues with urgency, fostering an environment that values Test cricket as the ultimate stage for greatness. 

For the players, especially Shakib and Mustafiz, the challenge is twofold: to honour their immense talent and to recognize the responsibility that comes with representing a Test-playing nation. The Guyana victory is a reminder that redemption is possible, but it requires sustained effort, unity, and a collective will to rise above mediocrity. 

The Tigers’ journey continues, fraught with challenges but not devoid of hope. The road ahead demands introspection, resilience, and a renewed commitment to the game’s highest ideals. Only then can Bangladesh cricket truly roar.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Mirpur Turns Hostile: A Test of Patience and Composure

 

After the International Cricket Council (ICC) deemed the Chittagong pitch “below average” for yielding 1533 runs at the cost of just 24 wickets, Mirpur was expected to restore balance to the battle between bat and ball. The curator, perhaps mindful of the criticism, prepared a surface that offered turn from the first hour of play—a rare but welcome sight in modern Test cricket. By stumps, it was evident that this wicket had delivered a riveting day of cricket, where the ball held the upper hand without completely extinguishing the batsmen's hopes. 

For stand-in captain Mahmudullah Riyad, losing the toss might have been a blessing in disguise. His bowlers, led by the returning Abdur Razzak, exploited the conditions skillfully to bundle out Sri Lanka for 222—a score that was competitive on this treacherous surface but far from insurmountable. 

A Test of Technique: Sri Lanka’s Survival Act

Sri Lanka’s innings was a tale of two halves. At 116 for 6, they were teetering on the edge of disaster. Yet, Roshen Silva and Dilruwan Perera demonstrated the virtues of patience and technique, stitching together a partnership that steadied the ship. Unlike the earlier batsmen, who fell prey to loose strokes or misjudged turns, Silva and Perera chose caution over aggression. 

CricViz revealed their methodical approach: *“Since the fall of the sixth wicket, the pair of Roshen Silva and Dilruwan Perera have batted off the front foot to 66.6% of the deliveries they faced, compared to 56.9% earlier. The defensive shot percentage rose to 32.6% from 20.7%.”* 

Their partnership underscored a key lesson on this surface—survival required adaptability. As the pitch began to offer extravagant turn, it demanded composure and the ability to resist the temptation of flashy strokes. 

Earlier, Kusal Mendis had exploited the initial conditions, cashing in on the shorter deliveries from Mehidy Hasan Miraz and Razzak. CricViz noted his contrasting approach: *“Mendis camped more on the back foot (42%) compared to Silva (22%) and played defensive shots off just 18% of the deliveries to Silva’s 27%.”* While Mendis reaped early rewards, Silva’s and Perera’s innings demonstrated the discipline needed as the track began to bite. 

Bangladesh's Collapse: A Lesson in Panic and Poor Technique

Bangladesh’s response with the bat was nothing short of a calamity. The batsmen, fresh off a run-fest in Chittagong, seemed ill-prepared for the challenges of a wicket demanding restraint. Tamim Iqbal set the tone—unfortunately, for all the wrong reasons. His authoritative drive off the second ball of the innings was a statement of intent, but his dismissal on the very next delivery exposed his inability to adjust. Suranga Lakmal’s good-length ball demanded respect, but Tamim’s half-hearted forward push resulted in a simple return catch. It was not a wicket-taking delivery, but it claimed a wicket nonetheless. 

The chaos continued. Mominul Haque, scorer of twin centuries in the previous Test, committed an inexplicable error, running himself out with his bat in the air—a mistake more befitting a novice than a seasoned top-order batsman. ESPNcricinfo’s commentary aptly described it as “atrociously shoddy.”

Mushfiqur Rahim, Bangladesh’s most reliable batsman, appeared a shadow of himself. Struggling to judge the length and movement of Lakmal’s deliveries, he shouldered arms to a ball that jagged back to rattle his stumps. Once again, it was not a delivery of extraordinary quality; it was a moment of indecision that cost Bangladesh dearly. 

Imrul Kayes compounded the misery by misjudging a delivery from Dilruwan Perera, playing for turn that wasn’t there. His decision to waste a review on an obvious lbw only added to the frustration. 

A Crisis of Composure

Bangladesh’s collapse was less about Sri Lanka’s brilliance and more about their own inability to handle pressure. In the days of Chandika Hathurusingha, the Tigers had developed a reputation for resilience. They had learned to claw their way out of difficult situations and embrace the pressure of big moments. That character, however, seems to have faded. 

The recent failures in the Tri-series final and the struggles on a flat Chittagong pitch hinted at deeper issues, but Mirpur laid them bare. The loss of one or two quick wickets was enough to send the entire batting lineup into disarray. Sri Lanka’s bowlers bowled smartly, but they did not produce unplayable deliveries. Bangladesh’s batsmen simply lacked the mental fortitude to weather the storm. 

The Way Forward

This match serves as a stark reminder of the importance of adaptability in Test cricket. Tracks like Mirpur demand more than just technical skill; they test a batsman’s temperament and ability to think on their feet. While Sri Lanka’s Silva and Perera showed how to survive and thrive on such a wicket, Bangladesh’s batsmen succumbed to panic and poor decision-making. 

If Bangladesh are to regain their fighting spirit, they must address these psychological frailties. It is not enough to thrive on flat pitches; they must learn to embrace the challenge of difficult conditions. For now, the Mirpur track stands as a cruel teacher, exposing the flaws of a team that has forgotten how to fight. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Mushfiqur Rahim’s Leadership: A Reflection of Fragility and Missteps

Leadership in cricket, especially at the Test level, is a crucible that demands clarity of thought, tactical acumen, and the ability to inspire. Mushfiqur Rahim’s captaincy during the Bloemfontein Test against South Africa, however, painted a picture of confusion and a troubling lack of accountability. His decisions on the field, compounded by baffling statements off it, not only hurt Bangladesh’s chances but also raised serious questions about his suitability as a leader. 

The Toss: A Gift Squandered 

Winning the toss in cricket is often considered an advantage, offering the captain a chance to dictate terms. Yet, Mushfiqur’s post-match statement—“I think it was my mistake to win the toss”—defies both logic and expectation. This comment, delivered with an emotional undertone, betrayed not only his fragile confidence but also his inability to shoulder responsibility. 

The essence of captaincy lies in using opportunities wisely. At Potchefstroom and Bloemfontein, the toss presented Mushfiqur with a chance to leverage conditions favourable for batting first. Instead, his misreading of the pitch resulted in decisions that left his team vulnerable. To attribute failure to the fortune of winning the toss reflects a mindset unfit for the rigours of Test leadership. 

The real question is not about the toss but about Mushfiqur’s inability to read the track.

Was it the toss or the captain’s judgment that failed Bangladesh? The answer is glaringly obvious. 

The Blame Game: Bowlers and Beyond 

In his post-day press conference, Mushfiqur laid blame on the bowlers, stating, “Our bowling wasn’t up to the standard.” While the bowlers’ performances were not exemplary, this critique conveniently ignored the captain’s role in their ineffectiveness. 

Let us revisit the critical moments: 

1. Field Settings: Starting with only two slips for Mustafizur Rahman, despite favourable conditions, deprived the bowler of attacking options. A leg slip was inexplicably placed, forcing Mustafizur to bowl on middle and leg, playing into Dean Elgar’s strengths. 

2. Bowling Changes: Within the first six overs, Mushfiqur replaced his new-ball bowlers with Rubel Hossain and part-timer Soumya Sarkar—a chaotic rotation that disrupted rhythm and ceded momentum to the South African batsmen. 

3. Defensive Fields: Throughout the first session, defensive field placements allowed the opposition to settle. Aggressive bowling without aggressive fields is akin to a blade without its edge. 

4. Captain’s Positioning: Mushfiqur’s decision to field outside the inner circle, citing instructions from the team management, was perplexing. A captain’s presence in the inner circle is vital for strategy and communication. Delegating this responsibility to others undermined the very essence of his role. 

Blaming the bowlers for failing to execute plans is futile when the plans themselves are flawed. Leadership demands ownership, and Mushfiqur’s reluctance to acknowledge his missteps only deepened the team’s woes. 

The Role of a Captain: Courage, Intelligence, and Autonomy 

Mushfiqur’s claim that he was merely following the team management’s instructions raises a fundamental question: why, then, is he the captain? Cricket, unlike soccer, places the captain at the heart of decision-making. While inputs from coaches and team management are valuable, the captain must have the courage and intelligence to make independent decisions on the field. 

A captain who abdicates this responsibility reduces himself to a figurehead, eroding the team’s trust and morale. Mushfiqur’s remarks not only reflected a lack of autonomy but also hinted at a tendency to deflect blame—a trait unbecoming of a leader. 

The Personality Gap 

Leadership in Test cricket requires more than tactical knowledge; it demands a commanding personality, the ability to inspire confidence, and the resilience to face adversity. Mushfiqur’s repeated missteps and emotional responses suggest a leader struggling under the weight of expectations. 

Contrast this with players like Tamim Iqbal, whose assertive personality and understanding of the game have often been evident. Tamim’s leadership qualities, coupled with his ability to handle pressure, make him a compelling candidate for the role of Test captain. 

The Way Forward 

For Bangladesh cricket to progress, the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) must reevaluate its leadership choices. Mushfiqur Rahim’s tenure as Test captain has been marked by inconsistency, defensive tactics, and an inability to learn from mistakes. While his contributions as a player remain invaluable, leadership may not align with his strengths. 

Investing in a captain like Tamim Iqbal, who embodies the qualities of a modern leader, could rejuvenate the team and instil a sense of direction. Leadership is not about avoiding mistakes but about learning from them and inspiring others to rise above challenges. 

Conclusion 

Mushfiqur Rahim’s captaincy at Bloemfontein will be remembered not for its strategic brilliance but for its misjudgments and misplaced accountability. His comments off the field only underscored the gaps in his leadership. For Bangladesh cricket, this moment should serve as a turning point—a chance to reflect, reassess, and rebuild. Leadership is the cornerstone of success, and it is time for Bangladesh to find a leader who can truly rise to the occasion. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The Enigma of Mushfiqur Rahim’s Captaincy: A Study in Stubbornness

On October 4, 2017, ESPNcricinfo’s South African correspondent, Firdose Moonda, painted a vivid picture of the Bloemfontein pitch ahead of the second Test between South Africa and Bangladesh. Photographs showed a verdant strip, indistinguishable from the outfield, sparking speculation of a pace-friendly track. By the time of the toss, however, the reality was starkly different. Persistent rain had kept the pitch under covers, and what emerged was a dry surface, devoid of the anticipated grass and bounce. It was, as South African captain Faf du Plessis quipped, “a very normal cricket wicket,” ideal for batting first. 

Yet, Mushfiqur Rahim, leading Bangladesh, defied conventional wisdom and chose to field first—a decision that raised eyebrows and evoked ridicule. Du Plessis, with a smirk, encapsulated the incredulity of the moment, remarking, “Nine times out of 10, you bat first.” What followed was a masterclass in poor decision-making and flawed execution, an episode emblematic of Mushfiqur’s troubled captaincy. 

The Repetition of Errors 

Cricket, at its highest level, demands adaptability and a willingness to learn from past mistakes. Yet, Mushfiqur Rahim’s tenure as captain often seemed like a case study in the refusal to evolve. His decisions at Bloemfontein mirrored the errors made just days earlier at Potchefstroom. The toss decision, the defensive field placements, and the chaotic use of bowlers—all pointed to a captain who either lacked awareness or stubbornly resisted the lessons of experience. 

The decision to field first was perplexing enough, but the execution compounded the problem. Mustafizur Rahman, operating with the breeze from the Loch Logan End, was given a defensive field with only two slips and a leg slip—a placement that forced him to bowl on the middle and leg stump, allowing Dean Elgar to score with ease. Subashis Roy, after conceding 15 runs in a single over, was inexplicably replaced by part-time medium-pacer Soumya Sarkar within the first five overs—a move that defied logic on the opening morning of a Test match. By the 10th over, Mushfiqur had already cycled through four bowlers, a pattern more befitting of a club-level game than international cricket. 

Defensive Fields and Aggressive Bowlers 

Even when the Bangladeshi pacers found rhythm post-lunch, Mushfiqur’s defensive field placements undermined their efforts. The aggressive intent of Mustafizur, Rubel Hossain, and Subashis Roy was neutralized by a captain who seemed more intent on damage control than wicket-taking. South Africa’s batsmen, untroubled by the lack of attacking fields, treated the session as a leisurely outing, accumulating runs with ease. 

This recurring pattern of defensive captaincy not only frustrated the bowlers but also highlighted a deeper issue: Mushfiqur’s inability to trust his players and his own instincts. In Test cricket, bold decisions often yield the greatest rewards, but Mushfiqur seemed trapped in a cycle of indecision and fear. 

The Psychological Barrier 

Why does Mushfiqur persist with these flawed strategies? Psychology offers a potential explanation. Experts describe a phenomenon known as choice-supportive bias, where individuals rationalize their decisions post hoc, attributing positive qualities to their choices while downplaying their faults. Mushfiqur’s repeated justifications for his decisions—often couched in emotional or weakly logical terms—suggest a deep-seated reluctance to acknowledge mistakes. 

This bias is further compounded by a tendency to avoid discomfort. Admitting to errors is inherently unpleasant, but it is also the first step toward growth. Mushfiqur’s refusal to confront his missteps creates a self-perpetuating loop: flawed decisions lead to poor outcomes, which are then rationalized, ensuring the cycle continues. 

A Case Study in Leadership 

Mushfiqur’s captaincy offers a fascinating case study for leadership and behavioral psychology. His steadfast adherence to flawed strategies, even in the face of repeated failures, underscores the importance of adaptability and self-awareness in leadership. Neuroscientists and psychologists might find in him a rare subject to study the mechanisms of stubbornness and the barriers to learning from failure. 

For Bangladesh cricket, however, this is no academic exercise. Leadership at the international level is not just about tactics; it is about inspiring confidence, fostering trust, and making decisions that maximize the team’s potential. Mushfiqur’s struggles as captain suggest a disconnect between his role and his natural inclinations—a gap that has often left Bangladesh adrift in critical moments. 

The Way Forward 

To move forward, Mushfiqur must first confront the truth of his own fallibility. Mistakes, while inevitable, are only valuable if they lead to growth. A captain who cannot learn from the past is a liability to his team, no matter how skilled he may be as a player. 

For Bangladesh cricket, the lesson is equally clear: leadership is not just about seniority or individual talent but about the ability to adapt, inspire, and make sound decisions under pressure. As the team continues its journey on the global stage, it must prioritize leaders who embody these qualities, ensuring that the lessons of Bloemfontein are not lost to history. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar