A Morning of Mayhem: Bangladesh's Collapse and Mustafizur's Resolve

The second morning of the second Test was nothing short of a nightmare for Bangladesh, evoking memories of their early Test-playing days. A team that has steadily improved since 2015 suddenly appeared to regress, resembling a novice side overwhelmed by the occasion. Five wickets fell for just three runs—a catastrophic collapse reminiscent of a bygone era when such implosions were almost routine. In today’s context, however, such a debacle is difficult to digest, given the strides Bangladesh has made in the longer format of the game. 

Childish Dismissals and a Shattered Top Order 

The dismissals were not the result of unplayable deliveries but rather a series of schoolboy errors. Liton Das, expected to anchor the innings, played a loose shot away from his body with no discernible footwork, dragging a Suranga Lakmal delivery onto his stumps. Mahmudullah Riyad, the stand-in captain, was undone by a peach from Akila Dananjaya, but Sabbir Rahman followed with an ill-advised stroke that sent him back without troubling the scorers. The tail offered little resistance, leaving Mehidy Hasan Miraz stranded and stunned at the other end. 

Sri Lanka’s lead, already significant, grew into a towering advantage, with every additional run piling pressure on the beleaguered hosts. A deficit of over 100 runs on such a tricky surface is daunting, but what compounded the misery was the lack of fight. 

A Team Without a Backbone 

This Bangladesh side lacks the resilience that once defined them under the stewardship of Chandika Hathurusingha. Back then, the Tigers were known for their tenacity and their ability to claw back from impossible situations. Today, they resemble an ice sculpture in the desert—melting under the relentless heat of pressure. 

The pitch, offering sharp turn and variable bounce from the good-length area, was tailor-made for Bangladesh’s spinners to exploit. Yet, neither Taijul Islam nor Abdur Razzak could rise to the occasion. Taijul, who impressed on Day 1 with fuller lengths, inexplicably reverted to bowling shorter and wider, leaking runs in the process. Razzak, on the other hand, struggled with his line, frequently drifting to the leg side—a cardinal sin on a turning track. 

Negative Tactics and Sri Lanka’s Resurgence 

Instead of attacking, the spinners adopted a containment strategy, a defensive approach that proved both futile and counterproductive. Their lack of aggression allowed Sri Lanka’s batsmen, particularly Roshen Silva, to settle in and capitalize. Silva’s wagon wheel revealed the extent of Bangladesh’s wayward bowling, with runs flowing freely through backward point, cover, long-off, and fine leg. 

Mehidy Hasan Miraz toiled valiantly at one end, probing and testing the batsmen, but he was let down by the lack of support from the other bowlers. The collective energy of the team visibly sagged, shoulders drooping as Sri Lanka’s lead continued to grow. 

Mustafizur Rahman: A Beacon of Hope 

Amid the gloom, one man stood tall—Mustafizur Rahman. The left-arm pacer was a shining example of how to bowl with intent and precision, even on a surface favouring spinners. 

In the 56th over, Mustafizur was handed the ball for a short burst, and he delivered spectacularly. Operating from around the wicket, he pitched a delivery on a good length that moved away just enough to induce an edge from Dilruwan Perera, caught by Liton Das. The very next ball, he tempted Akila Dananjaya into a similar mistake, with Liton completing another sharp catch. A hat-trick was on the cards, but Lakmal managed to survive. 

Mustafizur’s spell was a masterclass in controlled aggression. Mixing his trademark cutters with conventional deliveries, he consistently hit the good and back-of-a-length areas, extracting movement and unsettling the batsmen. His ability to generate contrast swing at pace added another layer of complexity to the Sri Lankan lineup. 

Even earlier in the innings, Mustafizur had been Bangladesh’s most effective bowler. His relentless focus on attacking the top of the off-stump set him apart from his colleagues, who often strayed into defensive lines. His positive intent throughout the day was a lesson for his teammates, highlighting the importance of belief and purpose in the face of adversity. 

 The Road Ahead 

While Sri Lanka’s lead looms large and Bangladesh’s batting frailties have been laid bare, Mustafizur’s performance offers a glimmer of hope. His fiery spell serves as a reminder that resilience and intent can turn the tide, even in dire circumstances. For Bangladesh to salvage something from this Test, they must channel the fighting spirit that once defined them and take a leaf out of Mustafizur’s book. Only then can they hope to rewrite the narrative of this forgettable morning. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Mirpur Turns Hostile: A Test of Patience and Composure

 

After the International Cricket Council (ICC) deemed the Chittagong pitch “below average” for yielding 1533 runs at the cost of just 24 wickets, Mirpur was expected to restore balance to the battle between bat and ball. The curator, perhaps mindful of the criticism, prepared a surface that offered turn from the first hour of play—a rare but welcome sight in modern Test cricket. By stumps, it was evident that this wicket had delivered a riveting day of cricket, where the ball held the upper hand without completely extinguishing the batsmen's hopes. 

For stand-in captain Mahmudullah Riyad, losing the toss might have been a blessing in disguise. His bowlers, led by the returning Abdur Razzak, exploited the conditions skillfully to bundle out Sri Lanka for 222—a score that was competitive on this treacherous surface but far from insurmountable. 

A Test of Technique: Sri Lanka’s Survival Act

Sri Lanka’s innings was a tale of two halves. At 116 for 6, they were teetering on the edge of disaster. Yet, Roshen Silva and Dilruwan Perera demonstrated the virtues of patience and technique, stitching together a partnership that steadied the ship. Unlike the earlier batsmen, who fell prey to loose strokes or misjudged turns, Silva and Perera chose caution over aggression. 

CricViz revealed their methodical approach: *“Since the fall of the sixth wicket, the pair of Roshen Silva and Dilruwan Perera have batted off the front foot to 66.6% of the deliveries they faced, compared to 56.9% earlier. The defensive shot percentage rose to 32.6% from 20.7%.”* 

Their partnership underscored a key lesson on this surface—survival required adaptability. As the pitch began to offer extravagant turn, it demanded composure and the ability to resist the temptation of flashy strokes. 

Earlier, Kusal Mendis had exploited the initial conditions, cashing in on the shorter deliveries from Mehidy Hasan Miraz and Razzak. CricViz noted his contrasting approach: *“Mendis camped more on the back foot (42%) compared to Silva (22%) and played defensive shots off just 18% of the deliveries to Silva’s 27%.”* While Mendis reaped early rewards, Silva’s and Perera’s innings demonstrated the discipline needed as the track began to bite. 

Bangladesh's Collapse: A Lesson in Panic and Poor Technique

Bangladesh’s response with the bat was nothing short of a calamity. The batsmen, fresh off a run-fest in Chittagong, seemed ill-prepared for the challenges of a wicket demanding restraint. Tamim Iqbal set the tone—unfortunately, for all the wrong reasons. His authoritative drive off the second ball of the innings was a statement of intent, but his dismissal on the very next delivery exposed his inability to adjust. Suranga Lakmal’s good-length ball demanded respect, but Tamim’s half-hearted forward push resulted in a simple return catch. It was not a wicket-taking delivery, but it claimed a wicket nonetheless. 

The chaos continued. Mominul Haque, scorer of twin centuries in the previous Test, committed an inexplicable error, running himself out with his bat in the air—a mistake more befitting a novice than a seasoned top-order batsman. ESPNcricinfo’s commentary aptly described it as “atrociously shoddy.”

Mushfiqur Rahim, Bangladesh’s most reliable batsman, appeared a shadow of himself. Struggling to judge the length and movement of Lakmal’s deliveries, he shouldered arms to a ball that jagged back to rattle his stumps. Once again, it was not a delivery of extraordinary quality; it was a moment of indecision that cost Bangladesh dearly. 

Imrul Kayes compounded the misery by misjudging a delivery from Dilruwan Perera, playing for turn that wasn’t there. His decision to waste a review on an obvious lbw only added to the frustration. 

A Crisis of Composure

Bangladesh’s collapse was less about Sri Lanka’s brilliance and more about their own inability to handle pressure. In the days of Chandika Hathurusingha, the Tigers had developed a reputation for resilience. They had learned to claw their way out of difficult situations and embrace the pressure of big moments. That character, however, seems to have faded. 

The recent failures in the Tri-series final and the struggles on a flat Chittagong pitch hinted at deeper issues, but Mirpur laid them bare. The loss of one or two quick wickets was enough to send the entire batting lineup into disarray. Sri Lanka’s bowlers bowled smartly, but they did not produce unplayable deliveries. Bangladesh’s batsmen simply lacked the mental fortitude to weather the storm. 

The Way Forward

This match serves as a stark reminder of the importance of adaptability in Test cricket. Tracks like Mirpur demand more than just technical skill; they test a batsman’s temperament and ability to think on their feet. While Sri Lanka’s Silva and Perera showed how to survive and thrive on such a wicket, Bangladesh’s batsmen succumbed to panic and poor decision-making. 

If Bangladesh are to regain their fighting spirit, they must address these psychological frailties. It is not enough to thrive on flat pitches; they must learn to embrace the challenge of difficult conditions. For now, the Mirpur track stands as a cruel teacher, exposing the flaws of a team that has forgotten how to fight. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Tale of Two Spinners in Mirpur: The Return of Abdur Razzak But Taijul Islam Was More Impressive

The eve of the second Test saw the cricketing fraternity of Bangladesh abuzz with the surprising inclusion of Abdur Razzak. Once a stalwart in Bangladesh’s limited-overs setup, Razzak’s Test career had been far from stellar. Averaging 67 with only 22 wickets in 12 Tests, his performances in the longer format had failed to justify his potential. Over time, his inconsistency led to his omission, and his name slowly faded from national contention.

But Razzak never gave up. While the door to international cricket seemed firmly shut, he continued to toil in domestic cricket, amassing wickets and keeping his name alive in conversations. However, the competition for places in the Bangladesh team is fiercer than ever, with young talents rising steadily. For Razzak, the wait was a test of patience, faith, and resilience. The media, too, played its part, persistently advocating for his recall despite the apparent futility of investing in a cricketer whose prime had seemingly passed.

Yet, as cricket often reminds us, persistence has its rewards. With Sunzamul Islam’s underwhelming performance in the first Test, the selectors turned to the veteran. Razzak was handed a lifeline, and he seized it with both hands. On his comeback, he claimed four wickets, silencing critics and reigniting discussions about his utility in the Test side. 

However, a closer analysis of his wickets reveals a mixed picture. While his dismissals of Dinesh Chandimal and Kusal Mendis showcased his guile, the wickets of Dimuth Karunaratne and Danushka Gunathilaka owed more to the batsmen’s poor shot selection than to any brilliance from the bowler. Regardless, wickets are the currency of bowlers, and Razzak’s tally of four on his comeback day cannot be dismissed. 

The Quiet Brilliance of Taijul Islam

Amid the celebration of Razzak’s return, the efforts of Taijul Islam went largely unnoticed—a familiar story for the tireless left-arm spinner. Taijul has long played the role of the unsung hero in Bangladesh’s bowling lineup. Often overshadowed by Shakib Al Hasan’s brilliance or Mustafizur Rahman’s flair, Taijul has been the dependable workhorse, toiling away under the sun on unforgiving pitches. 

On Razzak’s comeback day, Taijul once again proved his mettle, delivering a performance that arguably outshone the veteran. While Razzak and Mehidy Hasan Miraz leaked runs at over four per over, Taijul brought control and discipline. He adjusted his length masterfully, pitching fuller and attacking the stumps, forcing the batsmen onto the front foot. 

His reward came in the form of key wickets. Dhananjaya de Silva was undone by a sharp slider that found the edge, while Niroshan Dickwella’s over-eager advance down the track ended in shattered stumps. When Roshen Silva and Dilruwan Perera threatened to rebuild, Taijul broke their resistance with a loopy delivery that induced a bat-pad catch. He capped off his day with a delivery that reared off a good length, grazing Roshen’s glove and landing safely in Liton Das’s hands. 

Statistics further highlight Taijul’s impact. According to CricViz, Taijul bowled fuller and more probing lengths, drawing batsmen forward 61.1% of the time compared to Razzak’s 56%. He also kept the batsmen on a tighter leash, with only 22.2% of his deliveries attacked, compared to Razzak’s 29%. 

Unlike his usual role as a defensive bowler tasked with holding one end, Taijul embraced the responsibility of being a strike bowler. His change in approach—from containment to aggression—was evident in his altered lines and lengths. On a day when the spotlight was on Razzak, Taijul quietly stole the show with his craft and consistency. 

 A Tale of Two Spinners

Razzak’s return is a testament to perseverance and the unpredictable nature of cricket, but it also raises questions about the long-term direction of Bangladesh’s Test cricket strategy. While his four-wicket haul is a moment to celebrate, it is Taijul’s adaptability and skill that point to the future. Bangladesh must recognize the value of nurturing bowlers like Taijul, who can deliver under pressure and adapt to different roles.

On a day when Bangladesh’s batting woes continued to dominate the narrative, Taijul’s performance was a silver lining. His ability to overshadow a veteran’s much-celebrated return speaks volumes about his potential and the impact he can have on Bangladesh’s Test fortunes. 

As the dust settles on this day of contrasting stories, one thing is clear: while comebacks are worth celebrating, the quiet contributions of unsung heroes like Taijul must not be overlooked. For it is in their relentless efforts that the foundation of a team’s success is built. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Test Match That Died a Slow Death: Chittagong’s Pitch Fiasco

At 3:20 pm local time, Mahmudullah Riyad and Dinesh Chandimal shook hands, signalling the end of the first Test between Bangladesh and Sri Lanka in Chittagong. A match that spanned five laborious days concluded in a draw, leaving cricket fans with little to cherish apart from personal milestones. The pitch, a lifeless stretch of turf, offered no assistance to bowlers and ensured a run-fest that stretched the patience of even the most ardent Test cricket enthusiasts.

The statistics were damning: 1,533 runs scored for the loss of just 24 wickets over five days. While batsmen like Mominul Haque, Dhananjaya de Silva, Kusal Mendis, and Roshen Silva feasted on the benign surface to notch up centuries, others such as Tamim Iqbal, Mushfiqur Rahim, and Liton Das fell agonizingly short. Dimuth Karunaratne, ironically, would be the most disappointed of all, failing to even open his account on this batting paradise.

Yet, amidst the accolades for Mominul Haque, who became the first Bangladeshi to score centuries in both innings of a Test, there was a lingering sense of hollowness. His technical flaw—bringing the bat down from the gully region instead of straight—remains unaddressed, a concern that will likely haunt him on more challenging surfaces. Praises for such feats on this dead track seem misplaced, for this was not a Test that celebrated the spirit of cricket but rather exposed its vulnerabilities.

The Death of Contest

The Chittagong pitch was a disaster for Test cricket, a poor advertisement for the format’s relevance. Zahid Reza, the local curator, prepared a wicket that failed to deteriorate over five days, depriving bowlers of any semblance of assistance. The bounce remained low and slow, the turn negligible, and the contest between bat and ball virtually non-existent.

According to the International Cricket Council (ICC), a good Test pitch should strike a balance, offering something for bowlers early on while progressively deteriorating to challenge batsmen as the match wears on. By those standards, the Chittagong surface was a travesty. It favoured batsmen excessively, reduced bowlers to mere spectators and robbed the match of any intrigue or excitement.

ICC Standards and the "Poor" Rating

The ICC rates pitches based on several criteria, emphasizing the need for a fair contest between bat and ball. Pitches are categorized as "very good," "good," "average," "below average," "poor," or "unfit." A "poor" pitch is one that fails to provide bowlers with sufficient opportunities or skews the game excessively in favour of batsmen. The Chittagong pitch fits this description perfectly.

Consider the Boxing Day Test at the Melbourne Cricket Ground (MCG) in 2017. The ICC deemed that pitch "poor" after only 24 wickets fell in five days, with just 1,081 runs scored. The lifeless nature of the surface led to widespread criticism, and Cricket Australia faced significant scrutiny. If the historic MCG was not spared, why should Chittagong escape similar censure?

Lessons from History

Bangladesh’s recent successes in Test cricket have come on challenging tracks that offered assistance to bowlers. Memorable victories against England and Australia in 2016 and 2017 were achieved on turning pitches in Mirpur. Tamim Iqbal’s gritty century against England in 2016 on a spinning track remains far more significant than Mominul’s twin centuries on this lifeless deck.

By preparing such dead surfaces, Bangladesh risks stagnating in their development as a Test-playing nation. These tracks may inflate batting averages and pad individual records, but they do little to prepare the team for the rigours of international cricket. Worse, they reflect a fear of losing—a mindset that will only perpetuate the team’s struggles abroad.

Accountability and Change

The Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) must take accountability. Just as they sought explanations from Gamini Silva for the Mirpur track during the Tri-series final, they must hold Zahid Reza accountable for this debacle. Test cricket thrives on competitive surfaces that challenge both batsmen and bowlers. Preparing pitches that are devoid of life not only harms the game but also tarnishes Bangladesh’s reputation as a host nation.

The Way Forward

If Bangladesh is serious about improving in Test cricket, they must abandon the practice of preparing such docile tracks. True progress comes from competing on surfaces that test technique, temperament, and strategy. Home advantage should not mean stripping the game of its essence but rather leveraging conditions to foster growth and resilience.

For now, the Chittagong Test will be remembered not for the records it produced but for the opportunities it squandered. It was a match that promised much but delivered little—a stark reminder of what happens when the balance of cricket is sacrificed at the altar of convenience.

 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Day 4: Bangladesh Under Pressure as Sri Lanka Tighten the Noose

 

“We have a pretty good chance to win the Test. It is a pretty good wicket. It is all turning from the rough and outside the stumps. We are hoping to start the day well. We are bowling in good areas, line and length.”

These were the confident words of Niroshan Dickwella, Sri Lanka’s charming and ever-optimistic wicketkeeper, at the end of Day 4 of the first Test in Chittagong. For followers of Bangladesh cricket, such a statement might have been unexpected on a pitch that had been an unyielding paradise for batsmen. Bangladesh, after all, had vocally advocated for pitches tailored to their strengths, yet the very track they wished for seemed to have betrayed them.

As the scoreboard read 81 for 3 at stumps, with two of Bangladesh’s in-form batsmen back in the pavilion, questions about the team’s temperament resurfaced. Could the Tigers handle the pressure of chasing down a daunting target? History suggests they have shown flashes of resilience under scoreboard pressure, but all too often, these moments have ended in disappointment. Once again, the specter of collapse loomed large.

A Tale of Missed Opportunities

Dickwella’s assessment of the Chittagong wicket was accurate: the ball was turning, but only from the rough and primarily outside the stumps. On Day 4, such behavior from the pitch was to be expected, but the surface remained fundamentally good for batting. Isolated instances of turn and uneven bounce should not have unsettled the hosts. A positive mindset and disciplined shot selection were the need of the hour. Instead, Bangladesh’s top order faltered, playing into Sri Lanka’s hands.

Sri Lanka had declared earlier in the day with a lead of 200 runs, setting the stage for Bangladesh to salvage the situation. Tamim Iqbal and Imrul Kayes began promisingly, stitching together a 50-run partnership before the drinks break. However, the calm was short-lived. Kayes’ ill-advised ramp shot against Dilruwan Perera, despite the field being adjusted moments earlier, epitomized poor decision-making. The ball, innocuous in its trajectory, caught the toe-end of the bat and was gleefully pouched at square leg. It was a gift Sri Lanka didn’t need to ask for.

Tamim, who had been handling Lakshan Sandakan’s quick deliveries with relative ease, then fell to a lapse in judgment. Chasing a wide skidder outside off-stump, he edged to Dickwella, playing a shot more suited to a limited-overs game. On a surface that still favored batsmen, such dismissals were less a testament to the bowlers’ guile and more an indictment of the batsmen’s lack of application.

The Spin Web Tightens

While Perera and Sandakan had already made their mark, the wily veteran Rangana Herath entered the fray in the final over of the day. His subtle variations and unerring accuracy were on full display as he trapped Mushfiqur Rahim at silly point. Herath’s late strike bolstered Sri Lanka’s position and lent weight to Dickwella’s optimistic post-match comments.

Tactical Insights and Oversights

Dickwella’s observations about the rough outside off-stump deserve attention. On Day 3, a specific area on the back of a length around off-stump began to show signs of uneven bounce, with puffs of dust rising ominously. Such nuances are critical on flat tracks, offering bowlers a glimmer of hope. Sri Lanka’s think tank, led by the astute Chandika Hathurusingha, capitalized on these cues, directing their spinners to exploit the rough with precision.

In contrast, Bangladesh’s tactical approach appeared reactive and uninspired. Their inability to identify and target these areas highlighted a lack of situational awareness. On a surface as docile as this, such oversights can prove costly.

The Road Ahead

As the final day looms, Bangladesh must tread carefully. The rough areas on the pitch will continue to pose challenges, but the onus is on the batsmen to adapt and display resolve. Positive intent, combined with judicious shot selection, will be crucial. Anything less risks turning this match into an embarrassment for the hosts.

For Sri Lanka, the equation is simple. With the momentum firmly in their favour, they will aim to maintain pressure and exploit any chinks in Bangladesh’s armour. The Tigers, now cornered, must summon every ounce of grit and determination to salvage a draw if not an unlikely victory.

In the end, this Test may well be remembered not for the lifeless pitch but for the stark contrast in how the two teams approached its challenges. One embraced the nuances; the other was undone by them.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

 

Day 3: Sri Lanka Dominate on a Chittagong Featherbed

 It was a day of toil and tedium for Bangladesh as Sri Lanka, led by a masterclass from Kusal Mendis (196) and a fluent 173 from Dhananjaya de Silva, ended Day 3 of the first Test in Chittagong at a commanding 504 for 3. Roshen Silva added an unbeaten 87 to the mix, further deepening Bangladesh's woes on a pitch that has turned into a veritable batting paradise. Sri Lanka now trail Bangladesh’s first innings total of 513 by just nine runs, with seven wickets still in hand.

While the scoreboard painted a picture of dominance, the story of the day was the Chittagong surface, which has effectively neutralized the contest. The track, offering little to no assistance for bowlers, has already yielded over a thousand runs in just three days. Even a member of the Bangladesh team’s support staff was caught napping during the monotony of the day’s play—a telling image of the grind that unfolded.

The Revival of Mendis and de Silva

Six months ago, both Kusal Mendis and Dhananjaya de Silva were grappling with form issues. However, the benign conditions in Chittagong seemed tailor-made for their resurgence. The duo batted with elegance and authority, scoring at a brisk rate of 3.5 runs per over. Mendis’ innings, in particular, was a study in balance, as he drove, cut, and flicked with precision to anchor Sri Lanka’s reply.

De Silva, meanwhile, was in imperious touch, mixing caution with aggression. His innings not only showcased his technical prowess but also his ability to accelerate when required. Together, they made Bangladesh’s bowling attack look toothless, milking runs with ease.

Bangladesh’s Spinners: Toil Without Reward

The three-pronged spin attack of Taijul Islam, Mehidy Hasan Miraz, and Sunzamul Islam bore the brunt of Sri Lanka’s dominance, sending down a combined 117 overs for 379 runs. Mehidy, in particular, struggled to find the rhythm, conceding runs at an alarming economy rate of 5.10. While there were occasional attempts to vary pace and trajectory, the lack of bite and pace on the deliveries rendered these efforts largely ineffective.

In the early part of the day, Bangladesh’s spinners bowled at speeds hovering around 75 to 80 km/h, far too slow to trouble batsmen on this placid surface. By the final session, they marginally increased their speeds to 80-87 km/h, but the damage had already been done. The spinners’ inability to adapt quickly to the conditions underscored the limitations of a one-dimensional attack.

Mustafizur Rahman: A Lone Warrior

On a day when bowlers were consigned to the role of spectators, Mustafizur Rahman stood out with his skill and intent. With the first new ball, he consistently probed the good and full-length areas, generating movement off the seam and beating the bat on several occasions. His ability to bowl with precision from both over and around the wicket added variety to his attack.

Mustafiz’s second spell with the new ball was even more impressive. Recognizing the futility of defensive bowling on such a lifeless pitch, he opted for an aggressive approach, mixing short-pitched deliveries with off-cutters, away swingers, and in-cutters. This attacking mindset accounted for the wicket of Dhananjaya de Silva, who fell to a well-directed short ball while attempting to accelerate. De Silva’s dismissal marked a brief period of control for Bangladesh, as Sri Lanka’s scoring rate dipped to 2.7 runs per over in the final session.

What set Mustafiz apart was his unrelenting pursuit of wickets. He attacked the top of off-stump with precision and wasn’t afraid to pitch the ball on middle and leg to induce movement back into the right-handers. Even when these tactics carried the risk of being punished, Mustafiz’s courage and commitment to his craft were evident.

A Missed Opportunity for Bangladesh’s Think Tank

In hindsight, Bangladesh’s decision to field three spinners and only two pacers appears shortsighted. On a track that offered no assistance to spin, an additional pacer could have provided Mustafizur with much-needed support and added a cutting edge to the attack. The absence of a second seamer capable of exploiting reverse swing or maintaining pressure with pace was glaring.

The lack of balance in the bowling attack has left Bangladesh reliant on individual brilliance rather than a cohesive unit. Mustafizur’s efforts deserve commendation, but Test cricket is seldom won by lone warriors. A more proactive approach in team selection and strategy will be crucial if Bangladesh hopes to compete on unforgiving surfaces.

Looking Ahead

With two days still to play, Sri Lanka will look to bat Bangladesh out of the game, piling on a lead that could put the hosts under pressure in the fourth innings. For Bangladesh, the focus will be on damage control and salvaging pride. However, unless the pitch undergoes a dramatic transformation, the prospect of a result in this Test seems as remote as any assistance for the bowlers on this Chittagong deck.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar   

Mahmudullah Riyad: The Unsung Hero of Bangladesh Cricket

In the annals of Bangladesh cricket, certain moments stand out as defining—the kind that light up a nation’s collective memory. Yet, lurking in the shadows of these celebrated episodes is a man who has quietly held the team together time and again: Mahmudullah Riyad. His story is not one of glamour or flamboyance but of resilience, composure, and an understated brilliance that often goes unnoticed.

Gazi’s Breakthrough, Mahmudullah’s Resolve

The year was 2012, and the cricketing world was abuzz with Sohag Gazi’s debut against the West Indies. Opening the bowling alongside Shahadat Hossain, Gazi’s dismissal of Chris Gayle turned him into an overnight sensation. As the West Indies declared after amassing a formidable total, Bangladesh’s reply was spearheaded by Nasir Hossain’s audacious counterattack. In the midst of this, Mahmudullah—batting at number seven—played a vital yet largely overlooked role, guiding Bangladesh to a 29-run lead. When the team faltered against Tino Best’s fiery spell on a spin-friendly track, it was Mahmudullah’s steely resolve that kept the dream alive. Yet, his efforts went unheralded as Bangladesh’s hopes were dashed with his dismissal.

Khulna 2012: Abul’s Euphoria Overshadows the Anchor

The second Test in Khulna saw Bangladesh reeling at 193 for 8 on the first day. It seemed another collapse was imminent until Mahmudullah found an unlikely ally in Abul Hasan. The pair stitched together a record-breaking 184-run partnership for the ninth wicket, with Abul’s flamboyant century capturing the nation’s imagination. While the spotlight firmly rested on Abul, few paused to acknowledge Mahmudullah’s role as the sheet anchor, providing stability and assurance in a precarious situation. His innings was a masterclass in tempering aggression with composure, yet it was drowned in the cacophony of Abul mania.

Chittagong 2015: Composure Amid the Fizz Mania

By 2015, Mustafizur Rahman had become the poster boy of Bangladesh cricket, his exploits in limited-overs cricket spilling over into the Test arena. On a sluggish Chittagong pitch against South Africa, Mustafiz’s incisive bowling dominated headlines. Amid the frenzy, Mahmudullah once again emerged as the quiet savior. Coming in at number four, he weathered the storm with a gritty 67 off 192 balls, laying the foundation for a strong Bangladesh response. Unfortunately, the Test was abandoned due to rain, and Mahmudullah’s efforts were eclipsed by the “Fizz” phenomenon.

Mirpur 2018: Holding Firm Against Sri Lanka

In the first Test against Sri Lanka at Mirpur, Bangladesh’s middle order seemed intent on squandering a flat batting track. Yet, Mahmudullah stood firm, marshalling the lower order to push the team past 500 runs. His innings was a testament to his ability to adapt and persevere, but as soon as the innings ended, the focus shifted to Mominul Haque and others. Once again, Mahmudullah’s quiet heroics faded into the background.

The Culture of Forgotten Heroes

Bangladesh cricket has long celebrated its flamboyant stars—those who dazzle with aggression or stir emotions with patriotic fervor. Tamim Iqbal’s stroke play, Shakib Al Hasan’s all-round brilliance, and Mustafiz’s youthful exuberance have made them household names. In contrast, Mahmudullah’s calm demeanor and workmanlike approach often fail to capture the public imagination. Yet, his contributions have been no less critical. He has been the glue holding the team together in moments of crisis, his innings often the difference between defeat and survival.

A Hero in the Shadows

Christopher Reeve once said, “A hero is an ordinary person who finds the strength to persevere and endure in spite of overwhelming obstacles.” By this definition, Mahmudullah is a true hero of Bangladesh cricket. He does not seek the limelight, nor does he crave adulation. Instead, he lets his bat do the talking, crafting innings of quiet significance that anchor the team in turbulent waters.

The Need for Recognition

As fans and pundits, we must learn to value substance over spectacle. Mahmudullah’s contributions may lack the fireworks of a Tamim six or the drama of a Mustafiz spell, but they are no less vital. His ability to bat with the lower order, his calm under pressure, and his unyielding determination make him an indispensable part of Bangladesh cricket.

Let us not forget Mahmudullah Riyad. He may not fit the mold of a conventional superstar, but in his quiet, steadfast way, he embodies the spirit of the game. It is high time we celebrate the unsung hero who has so often lit the way when the Tigers have lost their path.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The Fine Balance: Pitch Preparation and Accountability in Bangladeshi Cricket

 Cricket, often described as a battle between bat and ball, thrives on balance. However, recent controversies surrounding pitch preparation in Bangladesh have reignited debates about the fine line between home advantage and fairness. The Mirpur wicket for the Tri-series final between Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, which saw the hosts succumb to a heavy defeat, has become a focal point of discussion. Rather than introspection over poor batting, much of the blame has been shifted to the curator, Gamini Silva, for preparing a slow wicket. This episode reflects a recurring pattern of scapegoating in Bangladeshi cricket.

The Blame Game and Its Pitfalls

The Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) sought an explanation from Silva, alleging that the wicket failed to meet expectations. BCB Media Committee Chairman Jalal Yunus expressed discontent, claiming the pitch, expected to yield 320 runs, turned sluggish. This criticism, however, was based largely on speculative reports rather than concrete evidence. A private television channel’s conjectures fueled the narrative, prompting the BCB to question Silva. Yunus defended the inquiry as a routine procedure, but the optics of blaming an individual for a collective failure were hard to ignore.

From a neutral perspective, the criticism seems misplaced. While the pitch may not have been ideal, it was not unplayable. Mahmudullah Riyad’s composed innings on the same surface highlighted that application and adaptability, rather than conditions, were the key determinants of success. The tendency to deflect accountability onto external factors undermines efforts to address deeper issues within the team’s performance.

Home Advantage vs. Sporting Integrity

Bangladesh’s desire for pitches tailored to their strengths is not unusual. Home teams often leverage familiar conditions to gain an edge. However, there is a distinction between preparing result-oriented wickets and creating surfaces that overly favour one aspect of the game. The Chittagong pitch for the first Test against Sri Lanka exemplifies the latter. Described as a "road," it offered little for bowlers, reducing the contest to a batting exhibition. While Tamim Iqbal, Imrul Kayes, Mominul Haque, and Mushfiqur Rahim capitalized on the benign conditions, the lack of challenge rendered the match a predictable affair. Such wickets, while beneficial for boosting batting averages, do little to enhance the competitive spirit of Test cricket.

Result-oriented wickets, by contrast, test the skills of both batsmen and bowlers. They demand adaptability, resilience, and strategic acumen, qualities that define great teams. Bangladesh’s reliance on flat tracks reflects a defensive mindset, prioritizing safety over growth. True progress lies in embracing challenging conditions that expose weaknesses and foster improvement.

The Global Perspective on Pitches

The International Cricket Council (ICC) has been vigilant in addressing substandard pitches. Both bowler-friendly and batsman-dominated tracks have faced scrutiny. The Johannesburg wicket for the third Test between South Africa and India, rated “poor” by the ICC, was penalized for being excessively bowler-friendly. Similarly, the Melbourne Cricket Ground (MCG) received a warning and fines for a lifeless deck that produced a tame draw during the Boxing Day Test against England.

These examples highlight the ICC’s commitment to maintaining balance in cricket. While wickets should not disproportionately favor bowlers, they must also avoid reducing bowlers to mere spectators. Cricket’s essence lies in the contest between bat and ball, and curators play a pivotal role in preserving this equilibrium.

The Way Forward

Bangladesh’s approach to pitch preparation requires a paradigm shift. Emotional decisions, driven by short-term goals, often backfire. Instead, curators must adopt a logical and holistic perspective, considering the broader implications of their choices. Tracks that cater exclusively to batsmen may yield short-lived success but hinder the team’s development in the long run.

Moreover, the obsession with batsmen’s safety and comfort must give way to a more balanced outlook. Cricket is not merely about runs; it is about resilience, adaptability, and the ability to thrive under diverse conditions. Bowlers, who toil tirelessly on unresponsive surfaces, deserve equal consideration. After all, the beauty of cricket lies in its unpredictability, in the moments when a bowler’s skill triumphs over a batsman’s prowess.

Conclusion

The Mirpur controversy and the Chittagong batting parade underscore the need for introspection in Bangladeshi cricket. Blaming curators or conditions is a convenient escape, but true progress demands accountability and a willingness to embrace challenges. Bangladesh must strive for wickets that foster competitive cricket, where both bat and ball have their moments to shine. Only then can the team realize its full potential and contribute meaningfully to the global cricketing narrative.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A wind of change: The silent renaissance of Sri Lankan Cricket

Cricket often mirrors life-fleeting moments of triumph and heartbreak stitched together by resilience. On a balmy afternoon, when Tamim Iqbal charged down the wicket to hammer a delivery from Dushmantha Chameera, fate had something different in mind. Chameera, startled, let the ball slip through his grasp, a reminder of how brutal milliseconds in cricket can be. But what followed was not the expected script. The pacer didn't crumble, as he might have six months ago. Instead, he bounced back with a ferocious short-pitched ball that tempted Tamim into a mistimed hook shot—one that landed straight in the hands of midwicket.

 A glimpse of Sri Lanka’s transformation

The moment encapsulated a quiet but palpable shift in Sri Lanka’s approach to cricket. Chameera’s ability to remain unfazed after dropping a catch epitomized the newfound grit. This wasn’t the Sri Lankan team that seemed adrift not long ago, defeated by Zimbabwe and Bangladesh. Something intangible had changed: a culture of belief was seeping back into the veins of the team. 

In the eighth over, another subtle yet telling incident unfolded. Mohammad Mithun’s defensive push eked out a single thanks to a sloppy piece of fielding at cover. What could have demoralized the fielding side instead sparked a response—determination to tighten every bolt, leaving no room for lethargy. The very next over, Thisara Perera delivered a pinpoint direct hit from mid-off, catching Mithun short of his ground. 

 This was not just a team playing cricket; this was a team-building character.** 

From Chaos to Cohesion: Chandimal and the Rise of Leadership 

Mushfiqur Rahim and Mahmudullah Riyad fought back, stitching together a partnership that threatened to tilt the momentum. Sri Lankan captain Dinesh Chandimal, a player often criticized for lacking leadership flair, seemed undeterred. As his teammates quenched their thirst during the drinks break, Chandimal moved among them, offering words of encouragement. It was a subtle yet profound image - a captain uniting his men with purpose. 

And that leadership soon bore fruit. Chandimal’s tactical acumen came to life when he placed a leg slip for Mushfiq, sensing the batter’s intent to sweep Akila Dananjaya. The plan worked to perfection: a sweep, a gentle flick, and Mushfiq was caught, a dismissal born of strategy rather than chance. 

Chandimal’s evolution mirrored Sri Lanka’s broader resurgence

 Youthful Zeal and Strategic Gambles 

Sri Lanka’s newfound resilience wasn't limited to seasoned campaigners. The inclusion of Shehan Madushanka—plucked from the bench in place of the more experienced Sandakan—was a bold move that exemplified the team’s new philosophy. What seemed like a gamble paid off spectacularly, as the young pacer bagged a hat-trick on his debut, announcing himself to the cricketing world. 

This youthful exuberance - blended with fearless intent - symbolized a fundamental shift in the team’s mentality. No longer content with mediocrity, the Islanders embraced the idea of playing to win. 

Victory was no longer a distant dream - it was a destination they were sprinting toward.

Hathurusingha's Invisible Hand 

The silent architect of this renaissance was none other than Chandika Hathurusingha. His arrival as head coach came amid scepticism, but within weeks, the transformation was undeniable. Even when Sri Lanka lost key players like Angelo Mathews and Kusal Perera to injuries, Hathurusingha remained calm, urging his squad to focus on effort over outcome. His mantra? Play with intent, and the results will follow. 

Ironically, Bangladesh—where Hathurusingha once worked his magic—had let him go, seemingly blind to the coach's transformative powers. Under his tutelage, Bangladesh had grown from an underdog to a force to reckon with, and now, Sri Lanka was reaping the rewards of his philosophy. 

As Chandimal aptly put it, “We’re not thinking about the result. We’re focused on how to play good cricket.”

That mindset, simple yet profound, was redefining Sri Lanka’s cricketing future. 

Redemption from the Ashes 

Barely a week ago, this same Sri Lankan team had stumbled against Zimbabwe and been humbled by Bangladesh. Fans, exhausted by years of inconsistency, were quick to write them off. But Hathurusingha never flinched. He knew that the story was far from over. 

And now, with the team surging into the final—against all odds—it was clear that a new chapter was being written. The Sri Lankans were playing not just for pride but with conviction, a fearless brand of cricket that was born from self-belief, unity, and strategic brilliance. 

The Magic of a Coach 

In the end, it wasn’t just the tactics or the talent that made the difference - it was belief. Hathurusingha, through meticulous man-management and strategic insight, had rekindled the fire within the team. The heydays of Sri Lankan cricket might not be far away after all. 

For fans of Bangladesh, however, there was a bitter aftertaste. How could they let go of such a visionary coach, someone who had taken their team to new heights? Some in the media had even insulted Hathurusingha, failing to see the genius at work. 

Now, as the Sri Lankan team danced on the brink of redemption, it was hard not to feel a pang of regret. 

The magic of Hathurusingha was real—and it had just begun to cast its spell on the Islanders.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar