The first Test at
Chittagong is drawn and it was evident from Day 1. Overall, the Chittagong
track prepared by local curator Zahid Reza produced five days of dull cricket
and deserves to be rated as poor by ICC.
At 3:20 pm local time, Mahmudullah Riyad and Dinesh
Chandimal shook hands and called it a draw. And, with that, the painstaking
first Test ended. Apart from some nervy moments gifted by the poor shot
selection of Bangladesh batsmen in the final session of Day 4 and second
session of Day 5, the rest of the day only witnessed a hard toil for the
bowlers. The track was like a road which offered absolutely nothing for the
bowlers and only let the batsmen reach personal milestones.
The Bangladeshi and Sri Lankan batsmen scored heavily and
easily on this track. Mominul Haque, Dhananjaya de Silva, Kusal Mendis and
Roshen Silva cashed in big time to notch up hundreds while the likes of Dinesh
Chandimal, Tamim Iqbal, Mushfiqur Rahim and Liton Das had to regret not getting
a hundred on this easy deck. Meanwhile, Dimuth Karunaratne would be kicking
himself for not opening his account on this deck.
Mominul Haque has become the first Bangladesh batsman to
notch up tons in both innings of the same Test. A nice feat to cherish, but I
wish he achieved such on a more testing track. Still, Mominul’s problem with
the back lift persist. The bat is still not coming straight, but from third
slip and gully – a technical chink, which might trouble him on challenging
tracks.
You can shower all the praises on Mominul and keep bashing
Chandika Hathurusingha, but as a matter of fact, there is nothing to celebrate
about such feats on such a dead deck.
The first Test at Chittagong was an absolute poor
advertisement for Test cricket. In five days, it only killed Test cricket each
second and each minute. The local curator Zahid Reza prepared a wicket which
could only fetch 24 wickets in five days at the cost of 1533 runs.
***
Now let us know about how the International Cricket Council
(ICC) rates pitches and deems them unfit to play on. There are certain
conditions that the ICC has laid out in order for a pitch to meet their
requirements. They are listed below:
The objective of a Test pitch shall be to allow all the
individual skills of the game to be demonstrated by the players at various
stages of the match. If anything, the balance of the contest between bat and
ball in a Test match should slightly favour the bowling team,
A pitch should be expected to deteriorate as the match progresses,
and as a consequence, the bounce could become more inconsistent, and the ball
could deviate more (seam and spin) off the wearing surface.
The pitches can be rated:
Very Good: (if
there is) Good carry, limited seam movement and consistent good bounce early in
the match and as the pitch wears as the match progresses, with an acceptable
amount of turn on the first two days but natural wear sufficient to be
responsive to spin later in the game
Good: (if there
is) Average carry, moderate seam movement and consistent bounce both early in
the match and as the pitch wears as the match progresses, natural wear
sufficient to be responsive to spin from day 1, though not quite meeting the
criteria for carry and bounce for a "very good" pitch.
Average: (If it)
Lacks carry, and/or bounce and/or occasional seam movement, but consistent in
carry and bounce. A degree of turn, but with average bounce for the spinner.
Falling significantly short of "very good" with respect to carry,
bounce and turn.
Below Average:
(If there is) Either very little carry and/or bounce and/or more than
occasional seam movement, or occasional variable (but not excessive or
dangerous) bounce and/or occasional variable carry. If a pitch demonstrates
these features, then the pitch cannot be rated in a higher category regardless
of the amount of turn the pitch displays at any stage of the match.
Poor: A Poor
pitch is one that does not allow an even contest between bat and ball, either
by favouring the batters too much, and not giving the bowlers (seam and spin)
from either team sufficient opportunity to take wickets, or by favouring the
bowlers too much (seam or spin), and not giving the batters from either team
the opportunity to make runs. If any of the following criteria apply, a pitch
may be rated "poor":- The pitch offers excessive seam movement at any
stage of the match- The pitch displays excessive unevenness of bounce for any
bowler at any stage of the match- The pitch offers excessive assistance to spin
bowlers, especially early in the match- The pitch displays little or no seam
movement or turn at any stage in the match together with no significant bounce
or carry, thereby depriving the bowlers of a fair contest between bat and
ball.- The pitch offers excessive assistance to spin bowlers, especially early
in the match
Unfit: A pitch
may be rated 'unfit' if it is dangerous.
It is recognised that a limited amount of seam movement is
acceptable early in the match and that a pitch may develop some unevenness of
bounce for seam bowlers as the match progresses. This is acceptable, but should
not develop to a point where they would be described as "excessive".
It is acceptable for a pitch to offer some degree of turn on
the first day of a match, particularly in the sub-continent, though anything
more than occasional unevenness of bounce at this stage of the match is not
acceptable. It is to be expected that a pitch will turn steadily more as a
match progresses, and it is recognised that a greater degree of unevenness of
bounce may develop.
It is impossible to quantify the amount that a ball is
"allowed" to turn as bowlers will turn the ball differing amounts. The
type and identity of bowler shall be taken into account when assessing this
factor.
In no circumstances should the pitch 'explode'.
***
Now, considering the ratings and their criteria given above,
the track at Chittagong can be rated as poor. As because, there was hardly any
contest between bat and ball. It favoured the batters too much and gave bowlers
absolutely no opportunities. The bounce of the track was medium and got slower
as the day progressed. The nature of the deck hardly changed in five days and
gave no evidence of natural deterioration.
Last year, during the Boxing Day Test at Melbourne Cricket
Ground, The ICC has officially put Cricket Australia (CA) on notice about the
docile drop-in deck, which hardly broke up at all as Australia and England
battled to a dull draw. It was the first time an Australian Test pitch has
suffered the ignominy of being dubbed 'poor' by the sport's global governing
body.
Like Chittagong, only 24 wickets fell at MCG in five days.
Only 1081 runs in five days which ultimately killed the excitement of a Boxing
Day Test. The ICC match referee did not even bother to think about the
reputation of MCG and acted accordingly to report and the ICC rated the pitch
of historic ground as poor.
***
If the track at Melbourne can be rated as poor, then why not
the Chittagong one? The local curator has delivered a track similar to
Bangladesh’s National Cricket League, which heavily favours the batsmen. Yes,
the home team enjoys the benefits of home advantage, but that does not mean to
dish out a deck which is harmful for Test cricket and also, there is no meaning
to put the reputation of Bangladesh at stake.
Last week, Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) called up Gamini
Silva to seek an explanation about the Mirpur track where Bangladesh lost the
final of Tri-series. It was a track where there was no demon underneath, but
Bangladesh’s defeat was more about their lack of temperament, still, fingers
were pointed towards Gamini.
If BCB seeks explanation from Gamini then why not Zahid?
Judgments should not be biased.
Preparing such tracks won’t help Bangladesh to improve.
Bangladesh’s improvement in Test cricket in recent times has been due to the
tracks which offered help for the bowlers. Bangladesh’s success on home soil
against England and Australia in five-day matches were on turning tracks. Any
critic would rate Tamim Iqbal’s hundred at Mirpur against England in 2016 than
Mominul’s milestone at Chittagong against Sri Lanka.
For a team to improve in Test cricket, they need to shun
playing on such dead decks. Preparing such decks only indicate, the team is
afraid to lose and they found themselves at bay while touring abroad.
If the Bangladesh think tank and fans want the Tigers to
improve, they should not support on playing such poor decks.
Note: This article has been published at cricketsoccer on 04/02/2018 It’s a draw and it was evident on such a dead deck
Thank You
Faisal Caesar
No comments:
Post a Comment