A Test Match That Died a Slow Death: Chittagong’s Pitch Fiasco

At 3:20 pm local time, Mahmudullah Riyad and Dinesh Chandimal shook hands, signalling the end of the first Test between Bangladesh and Sri Lanka in Chittagong. A match that spanned five laborious days concluded in a draw, leaving cricket fans with little to cherish apart from personal milestones. The pitch, a lifeless stretch of turf, offered no assistance to bowlers and ensured a run-fest that stretched the patience of even the most ardent Test cricket enthusiasts.

The statistics were damning: 1,533 runs scored for the loss of just 24 wickets over five days. While batsmen like Mominul Haque, Dhananjaya de Silva, Kusal Mendis, and Roshen Silva feasted on the benign surface to notch up centuries, others such as Tamim Iqbal, Mushfiqur Rahim, and Liton Das fell agonizingly short. Dimuth Karunaratne, ironically, would be the most disappointed of all, failing to even open his account on this batting paradise.

Yet, amidst the accolades for Mominul Haque, who became the first Bangladeshi to score centuries in both innings of a Test, there was a lingering sense of hollowness. His technical flaw—bringing the bat down from the gully region instead of straight—remains unaddressed, a concern that will likely haunt him on more challenging surfaces. Praises for such feats on this dead track seem misplaced, for this was not a Test that celebrated the spirit of cricket but rather exposed its vulnerabilities.

The Death of Contest

The Chittagong pitch was a disaster for Test cricket, a poor advertisement for the format’s relevance. Zahid Reza, the local curator, prepared a wicket that failed to deteriorate over five days, depriving bowlers of any semblance of assistance. The bounce remained low and slow, the turn negligible, and the contest between bat and ball virtually non-existent.

According to the International Cricket Council (ICC), a good Test pitch should strike a balance, offering something for bowlers early on while progressively deteriorating to challenge batsmen as the match wears on. By those standards, the Chittagong surface was a travesty. It favoured batsmen excessively, reduced bowlers to mere spectators and robbed the match of any intrigue or excitement.

ICC Standards and the "Poor" Rating

The ICC rates pitches based on several criteria, emphasizing the need for a fair contest between bat and ball. Pitches are categorized as "very good," "good," "average," "below average," "poor," or "unfit." A "poor" pitch is one that fails to provide bowlers with sufficient opportunities or skews the game excessively in favour of batsmen. The Chittagong pitch fits this description perfectly.

Consider the Boxing Day Test at the Melbourne Cricket Ground (MCG) in 2017. The ICC deemed that pitch "poor" after only 24 wickets fell in five days, with just 1,081 runs scored. The lifeless nature of the surface led to widespread criticism, and Cricket Australia faced significant scrutiny. If the historic MCG was not spared, why should Chittagong escape similar censure?

Lessons from History

Bangladesh’s recent successes in Test cricket have come on challenging tracks that offered assistance to bowlers. Memorable victories against England and Australia in 2016 and 2017 were achieved on turning pitches in Mirpur. Tamim Iqbal’s gritty century against England in 2016 on a spinning track remains far more significant than Mominul’s twin centuries on this lifeless deck.

By preparing such dead surfaces, Bangladesh risks stagnating in their development as a Test-playing nation. These tracks may inflate batting averages and pad individual records, but they do little to prepare the team for the rigours of international cricket. Worse, they reflect a fear of losing—a mindset that will only perpetuate the team’s struggles abroad.

Accountability and Change

The Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) must take accountability. Just as they sought explanations from Gamini Silva for the Mirpur track during the Tri-series final, they must hold Zahid Reza accountable for this debacle. Test cricket thrives on competitive surfaces that challenge both batsmen and bowlers. Preparing pitches that are devoid of life not only harms the game but also tarnishes Bangladesh’s reputation as a host nation.

The Way Forward

If Bangladesh is serious about improving in Test cricket, they must abandon the practice of preparing such docile tracks. True progress comes from competing on surfaces that test technique, temperament, and strategy. Home advantage should not mean stripping the game of its essence but rather leveraging conditions to foster growth and resilience.

For now, the Chittagong Test will be remembered not for the records it produced but for the opportunities it squandered. It was a match that promised much but delivered little—a stark reminder of what happens when the balance of cricket is sacrificed at the altar of convenience.

 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Day 4: Bangladesh Under Pressure as Sri Lanka Tighten the Noose

 

“We have a pretty good chance to win the Test. It is a pretty good wicket. It is all turning from the rough and outside the stumps. We are hoping to start the day well. We are bowling in good areas, line and length.”

These were the confident words of Niroshan Dickwella, Sri Lanka’s charming and ever-optimistic wicketkeeper, at the end of Day 4 of the first Test in Chittagong. For followers of Bangladesh cricket, such a statement might have been unexpected on a pitch that had been an unyielding paradise for batsmen. Bangladesh, after all, had vocally advocated for pitches tailored to their strengths, yet the very track they wished for seemed to have betrayed them.

As the scoreboard read 81 for 3 at stumps, with two of Bangladesh’s in-form batsmen back in the pavilion, questions about the team’s temperament resurfaced. Could the Tigers handle the pressure of chasing down a daunting target? History suggests they have shown flashes of resilience under scoreboard pressure, but all too often, these moments have ended in disappointment. Once again, the specter of collapse loomed large.

A Tale of Missed Opportunities

Dickwella’s assessment of the Chittagong wicket was accurate: the ball was turning, but only from the rough and primarily outside the stumps. On Day 4, such behavior from the pitch was to be expected, but the surface remained fundamentally good for batting. Isolated instances of turn and uneven bounce should not have unsettled the hosts. A positive mindset and disciplined shot selection were the need of the hour. Instead, Bangladesh’s top order faltered, playing into Sri Lanka’s hands.

Sri Lanka had declared earlier in the day with a lead of 200 runs, setting the stage for Bangladesh to salvage the situation. Tamim Iqbal and Imrul Kayes began promisingly, stitching together a 50-run partnership before the drinks break. However, the calm was short-lived. Kayes’ ill-advised ramp shot against Dilruwan Perera, despite the field being adjusted moments earlier, epitomized poor decision-making. The ball, innocuous in its trajectory, caught the toe-end of the bat and was gleefully pouched at square leg. It was a gift Sri Lanka didn’t need to ask for.

Tamim, who had been handling Lakshan Sandakan’s quick deliveries with relative ease, then fell to a lapse in judgment. Chasing a wide skidder outside off-stump, he edged to Dickwella, playing a shot more suited to a limited-overs game. On a surface that still favored batsmen, such dismissals were less a testament to the bowlers’ guile and more an indictment of the batsmen’s lack of application.

The Spin Web Tightens

While Perera and Sandakan had already made their mark, the wily veteran Rangana Herath entered the fray in the final over of the day. His subtle variations and unerring accuracy were on full display as he trapped Mushfiqur Rahim at silly point. Herath’s late strike bolstered Sri Lanka’s position and lent weight to Dickwella’s optimistic post-match comments.

Tactical Insights and Oversights

Dickwella’s observations about the rough outside off-stump deserve attention. On Day 3, a specific area on the back of a length around off-stump began to show signs of uneven bounce, with puffs of dust rising ominously. Such nuances are critical on flat tracks, offering bowlers a glimmer of hope. Sri Lanka’s think tank, led by the astute Chandika Hathurusingha, capitalized on these cues, directing their spinners to exploit the rough with precision.

In contrast, Bangladesh’s tactical approach appeared reactive and uninspired. Their inability to identify and target these areas highlighted a lack of situational awareness. On a surface as docile as this, such oversights can prove costly.

The Road Ahead

As the final day looms, Bangladesh must tread carefully. The rough areas on the pitch will continue to pose challenges, but the onus is on the batsmen to adapt and display resolve. Positive intent, combined with judicious shot selection, will be crucial. Anything less risks turning this match into an embarrassment for the hosts.

For Sri Lanka, the equation is simple. With the momentum firmly in their favour, they will aim to maintain pressure and exploit any chinks in Bangladesh’s armour. The Tigers, now cornered, must summon every ounce of grit and determination to salvage a draw if not an unlikely victory.

In the end, this Test may well be remembered not for the lifeless pitch but for the stark contrast in how the two teams approached its challenges. One embraced the nuances; the other was undone by them.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

 

Tigers Roar at Mirpur: A Triumph Over Ghosts of the Past

For over a decade, Bangladesh’s Test cricket journey has been punctuated by heartbreaks that have cast doubt on their mental fortitude. From the nail-biting loss in Multan in 2003 to the close calls at Fatullah in 2006 and Chittagong in 2008, the Tigers had often roared but failed to deliver the decisive blow. These narrow defeats against cricketing giants dented their confidence, casting shadows on their ability to sustain competitive intensity over a series. 

The script seemed ominously familiar in Chittagong in 2016, during the first Test of a two-match series against England. Dominating for large parts of the match, Bangladesh faltered at the crucial juncture. England’s narrow victory revisited old wounds, threatening to shatter the Tigers’ fragile self-belief. Yet, what unfolded next in Mirpur was a story of resilience, redemption, and resurgence. 

The Weight of History

Bangladesh’s Test legacy had long been a tale of unfulfilled potential. Despite possessing talent, the team often stumbled at the cusp of glory, leaving critics to question their temperament. While they had sporadic successes—primarily against Zimbabwe or a depleted West Indies—victories against elite opposition remained elusive. 

The loss at Chittagong could have been another nail in the coffin of Bangladesh’s Test aspirations. Instead, it became the crucible that forged a new chapter. Much of the credit for this transformation lies with Chandika Hathurusingha, the head coach who, like a master craftsman, understood the psyche of his players. Hathurusingha’s ability to shield his team from negativity and instill positivity proved crucial in the aftermath of Chittagong’s heartbreak. 

Mirpur: Redemption’s Stage

Entering the second Test at Mirpur, the Tigers faced immense pressure. Their shaky first innings, where nine wickets fell for just 49 runs, only deepened doubts. Tactical missteps, such as Mushfiqur Rahim’s passive captaincy and lapses in fielding, further compounded their woes. At one point, the specter of another agonizing defeat loomed large. 

But the complexion of the match shifted dramatically after Tea on Day 3. Chandika’s reputed dressing-room intervention lit a fire under the team. Mushfiqur, often criticized for defensive tactics, adopted an aggressive approach. Close-in fielders encircled the English batsmen like hawks, and Mushfiq’s decision to unleash Mehedi Hasan Miraz proved inspired. 

Miraz, the teenage prodigy who had already proven his mettle in Chittagong, struck immediately. His incisive bowling rattled the English middle order, while Shakib Al Hasan provided the perfect foil at the other end. What ensued was a spell of relentless pressure and precision. England, once cruising, crumbled under the weight of Bangladesh’s newfound ferocity. 

Victory Beyond the Scoreboard

The Mirpur triumph was historic—not just as a victory but as a statement of intent. For the first time, Bangladesh overcame their propensity to "snatch defeat from the jaws of victory." They buried the ghosts of Chittagong and established themselves as contenders capable of upsetting the game’s heavyweights. 

This victory meant more than levelling the series. It was a turning point for a team whose Test status had often been questioned. For years, critics had dismissed Bangladesh as a team incapable of matching the rigor and resilience demanded by the longest format. Mirpur provided a resounding rebuttal. 

Lessons and the Road Ahead

While the Mirpur win was monumental, it also underscored areas of improvement. The team’s struggles against reverse swing, the lack of consistency in batting, and questionable shot selection remain glaring weaknesses. Tactical lapses, such as ineffective use of pace bowlers and moments of indecision in leadership, further highlight the need for introspection. 

Yet, the victory also showcased the Tigers’ hunger and growth. Under Hathurusingha’s meticulous guidance, there is hope that these flaws will be addressed systematically. His emphasis on mental toughness and preparation could transform the Test side into a formidable force, capable of competing consistently against the best. 

A New Dawn for Bangladesh Cricket

Mirpur was not just a match; it was a moment—a declaration that the Tigers had arrived on the Test stage with intent and belief. It signified a break from the past, a shedding of the “nearly there” tag that had haunted them for years. 

While there remains a long road ahead, the Mirpur triumph provides a foundation of belief. If nurtured with the right balance of discipline, ambition, and introspection, the Tigers may soon find themselves not just playing against the big boys but standing tall among them. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Echoes of Multan and Fatullah at Chattogram: A Tale of Hope, Heartbreak, and Lessons Learned

As the fifth day at Chattogram dawned, Bangladesh stood just 33 runs away from history. Sabbir Rahman, the calm debutant, was entrusted with steering the ship home alongside the tail-enders. Ninety overs lay ahead—a lifetime in cricketing terms—for the Tigers to exorcise the ghosts of Multan and Fatullah. Yet, within 19 minutes, dreams crumbled, and the hopes of a nation sank in the Bay of Bengal. 

The heartbreak was palpable. Another defeat, another haunting memory to join the ranks of Bangladesh’s near-misses. But amidst the wreckage, there were undeniable positives. This was no meek surrender; it was a battle, a statement of intent against one of the world’s most formidable Test teams. Bangladesh proved their mettle, testing England’s nerves and skills in a way few expected. 

As the caravan moves to Mirpur for the second Test, the task before Bangladesh is clear: to build on Chattogram’s promise and ensure that their spirited performance doesn’t remain an isolated spark. 

A Need to Move On: Learning from Chattogram

History warns of complacency. After the heroics at Fatullah against Australia in 2006, Bangladesh wilted in the second Test. Similarly, the defiant stand by Tamim Iqbal and Imrul Kayes at Khulna last year was followed by a dismal collapse in the next match against Pakistan. Both times, focus faltered, and hunger waned. 

This time must be different. The Chattogram defeat should not become a weight that drags the team down but rather a springboard for growth. Captain Mushfiqur Rahim’s post-match words struck a chord: 

"We tried what we could. Nobody expected Bangladesh to play in this manner after 15 months. We showed our character to a side like England. It’s not frustrating; it’s a learning experience."

This perspective is essential. Bangladesh’s next challenge is not just to replicate the fight but to elevate their game, correcting the errors that proved costly. 

Tactical Adjustments for Mirpur

1. Sabbir Rahman: A Star Rises

Sabbir Rahman’s debut was nothing short of remarkable. His calm, composed innings belied his inexperience, showcasing a batsman of immense promise. Too often in Bangladesh, Sabbir has been pigeonholed as a flamboyant limited-overs player. Yet, his Chattogram performance revealed a batsman with refined technique, exquisite timing, and the maturity to play grounded, risk-free strokes. 

For Mirpur, Sabbir should be promoted to number five. Shakib Al Hasan, while an all-round genius, can thrive lower in the order as a finisher and counter-attacker at six or seven. Sabbir’s elevation would add stability to the middle order, allowing Mushfiqur and Shakib to play their natural games without undue pressure. 

2. Strengthening the All-Round Core

Mehedi Hasan’s emergence as a bowler of substance has added a new dimension to Bangladesh’s attack. However, his batting, though promising, isn’t yet reliable enough for the number eight position. To bolster the lower order, Bangladesh should consider an all-rounder like Soumya Sarkar or Mosaddek Hossain. 

Soumya’s ability to contribute with both bat and ball makes him an ideal fit at eight. His medium-pace bowling can offer crucial support in keeping one end tight, while his batting has the potential to provide the late-order resistance often needed in tight contests. 

3. A Singular Focus on Pace

Bangladesh’s pace-bowling cupboard remains sparse, necessitating careful resource management. At Chattogram, Kamrul Islam struggled to make an impact, his lack of aggression and belief starkly evident. Mirpur could be the stage for Subashis Roy, a bowler with a proven track record in domestic cricket and the hunger to seize his chance. 

Bangladesh might also consider fielding only one specialist pacer, with Soumya Sarkar serving as a part-time seamer. This would allow the team to focus on their spinners, who are better equipped to exploit Mirpur’s conditions. 

Devising a Plan for Ben Stokes

Ben Stokes was England’s heartbeat at Chattogram. His controlled aggression with the bat and reverse swing with the ball turned the tide in England’s favor on multiple occasions. Neutralizing him will be critical. 

With the bat, Stokes has shown vulnerability against full, quick deliveries aimed at the stumps. Shakib Al Hasan’s quicker ball in the first innings exposed this weakness, and Bangladesh must persist with this strategy. With the ball, Stokes thrives on exploiting gaps in defence. Sabbir Rahman’s approach of staying back and behind the line offers a blueprint for countering his reverse swing. 

Chattogram’s Legacy and the Road Ahead

The Chattogram Test was more than just a cricket match—it was a crucible of resilience, a showcase of talent, and a reminder of the beauty of Test cricket. It forced Bangladesh to confront their limitations but also revealed its potential. 

As they head to Mirpur, the challenge will be to channel the lessons learned, staying focused, hungry, and united. This is an opportunity to prove that the fight at Chattogram was not a fleeting glimpse of greatness but the beginning of a new chapter in Bangladesh’s Test journey. 

Mirpur awaits. The ghosts of Multan and Fatullah can finally be laid to rest—but only if the Tigers roar with the same intensity that captivated the world at Chattogram.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Chattogram Test: A Masterclass in Cricketing Drama

 The Chattogram Test between Bangladesh and England came to a dramatic conclusion on the 82nd over of the final day. Ben Stokes, England’s indefatigable allrounder, delivered a good-length ball that darted into Shafiul Islam after pitching. The ball struck Shafiul’s front pad, and the appeal that followed was as emphatic as the umpire’s raised finger. Kumar Dharmasena, who endured a torrid match with his decisions, adjudged Shafiul out, reasoning that he was not offering a shot. Bangladesh’s review was in vain, and so ended one of the most thrilling Test matches of the year. 

This match was a kaleidoscope of cricketing excellence: breathtaking all-round displays by two of the game’s premier allrounders, Ben Stokes and Shakib Al Hasan; the promise of two exceptional debutants, Sabbir Rahman and Mehedi Hasan; and a pitch that became the silent protagonist of an unforgettable cricketing tale. 

The Chattogram Pitch: A Silent Hero

In today’s cricket, the idea of a “good pitch” is often reduced to a batsman-friendly surface where runs flow freely, with bowlers left to toil in frustration. Such surfaces inflate batting averages but come at the cost of Test cricket’s essence: the battle between bat and ball. These sterile pitches frequently yield dull draws or lopsided contests, raising questions about the future of the game. 

Yet, history tells us a different story. The most enthralling Test matches have often been contested on pitches that challenged batters and empowered bowlers. The Chattogram deck was one such surface—far from the modern ideal, but a perfect canvas for the artistry of Test cricket. 

This pitch had everything: bounce for the new-ball bowlers, turn for the spinners, and just enough unpredictability to keep batters second-guessing. As the match progressed, the surface slowed down, but not excessively. It demanded skill, adaptability, and precise technique from the batters. Careless footwork or a misjudged stroke proved costly, while disciplined batting was richly rewarded. 

Unlike the proverbial minefields, this deck was balanced—it didn’t outright favour bowlers, nor did it allow for freewheeling stroke play. Instead, it demanded that batters play each ball on merit, employing late adjustments and flawless footwork. For bowlers, it offered just enough to make them an integral part of the narrative. 

A Test of Skills and Mental Fortitude

The pitch’s character infused the match with drama, pushing players to their limits. It reduced reckless shot-making, forcing batters to focus on composure and calculated shot selection. It tested their ability to leave deliveries, rotate strikes, and build partnerships—hallmarks of classical Test batting. 

Bangladeshi fans, who often delight in boundary-laden innings, found themselves cheering for subtler moments of cricketing mastery. Sabbir Rahman’s singles and twos, Mushfiqur Rahim’s patience in leaving deliveries, and Tamim Iqbal’s restraint with big shots drew applause. Similarly, the crowd was captivated by England’s ability to rotate strikes during Ben Stokes and Jonny Bairstow’s vital partnership in the third innings. 

This shift in perspective among fans highlights a broader lesson: Test cricket’s allure lies not only in flamboyant shots but in its nuanced battles. The Chattogram pitch underscored the value of patience, resilience, and strategic gameplay—qualities that elevate the format above its shorter counterparts. 

The Call for Sporting Pitches

The match rekindled a debate about the role of pitches in preserving Test cricket’s relevance. As Sachin Tendulkar aptly observed, “The wickets need to change; they need to be more helpful for bowlers. In T20s, the greatest of bowlers are being reverse-swept. Three hundred is no longer competitive in ODIs. So there should be at least one format where bowlers have a better chance of executing their skills.” 

Tendulkar’s words resonate deeply in an era where batting often dominates. A true contest between bat and ball is the lifeblood of cricket, and pitches like Chattogram’s are critical to restoring balance. A track that challenges both batters and bowlers creates a narrative filled with tension, unpredictability, and moments of brilliance—everything that Test cricket should aspire to be. 

Preserving Test Cricket’s Soul

The Chattogram Test was a reminder of why this format remains the pinnacle of cricket. The pitch, meticulously crafted by Bangladeshi curators, played a pivotal role in this epic encounter. Its balanced nature enriched the contest, forcing players to adapt and innovate while captivating spectators with its twists and turns. 

As Test cricket faces challenges from shorter formats, pitches like these must become the norm rather than the exception. They hold the key to ensuring that the oldest format of the game not only survives but thrives in an era of instant gratification. 

In the end, the Chattogram Test wasn’t just a match; it was a celebration of cricket’s purest form—a tale where the pitch itself was a co-author of history.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The True Test of Cricket: Bangladesh’s Struggle in the Purest Format

Test cricket—the very phrase carries an aura of endurance, skill, and relentless discipline. It isn’t merely a sport; it’s an art form that examines not just a team’s technique but its temperament, concentration, and character. Over five long days, teams are tested to their limits, often multiple times in a single session. This format is the cradle of greatness, where legends are born, and mediocrity is ruthlessly exposed. 

For Bangladesh, the journey in this hallowed arena has been fraught with challenges. Since being awarded Test status sixteen years ago, the Tigers have endured a tumultuous path. Unlike Zimbabwe, whose decline was largely shaped by internal discord, Bangladesh’s story is one of a slow struggle to meet the rigorous demands of the game’s longest format. Criticism has been a constant companion, yet despite the scepticism, they remain a part of the Test fraternity. On October 20, in Chittagong, Bangladesh is set to host England—one of the most formidable teams in world cricket—for a two-match Test series. 

A Tale of Two Formats

England, unsurprisingly, enters the series as overwhelming favourites. Their squad, brimming with seasoned professionals, is a stark contrast to Bangladesh's outfit. Yet, the interest in this contest stems from Bangladesh’s stellar performances in the shorter formats over the last year and a half. Since their breakthrough World Cup campaign in Australia and New Zealand, Bangladesh has emerged as a force in limited-overs cricket, their resurgence offering hope to other emerging cricketing nations. 

But herein lies the paradox: while their exploits in ODIs and T20s have been impressive, they do little to address the deficiencies in Test cricket. Success in the shorter formats, though rewarding, cannot mask the glaring gaps in a side’s ability to endure the rigours of five-day cricket. 

As the whites replace the coloured jerseys, Bangladesh finds itself stripped of its most dynamic pace options. Mashrafe Mortaza, Taskin Ahmed, and Rubel Hossain—bowlers who have thrived in the limited-overs arena—are either unavailable or unsuited to the demands of Test cricket. The absence of Mustafizur Rahman, sidelined by injury, further exacerbates the issue. 

Strength in Batting, Weakness in Bowling

A glance at the 14-man squad announced for the series reveals a familiar pattern. The top order, featuring stalwarts like Tamim Iqbal, Mushfiqur Rahim, and Shakib Al Hasan, inspires confidence. But as one reads further down the list, optimism gives way to concern. The bowling unit, conspicuously underpowered, remains the Achilles’ heel of this team. 

Shafiul Islam’s pedestrian medium pace, Taijul Islam’s struggling left-arm orthodox spin, and debutant Kamrul Islam Rabbi, whose first-class average of 40.89 hardly inspires fear, form the backbone of the attack. The burden on Shakib Al Hasan, Bangladesh’s talismanic all-rounder, is enormous. But expecting him to single-handedly take 20 wickets against a robust English batting lineup is unrealistic. 

The Defensive Mindset

Compounding the issue is Bangladesh’s defensive approach to Test cricket. Fielding teams with eight batters and three frontline bowlers has become a norm, the strategy centred on survival rather than victory. This mindset stymies growth, reducing Test matches to exercises in damage control rather than opportunities for competitive excellence. 

History has repeatedly shown that the most dominant Test sides—Australia in the late 1990s, and the West Indies in the 1980s—were built around formidable bowling attacks. A potent bowling unit, capable of consistently taking wickets, is the cornerstone of success in this format. Without it, no batting effort, however monumental, can secure victories. 

The ODI Conundrum

Ironically, Bangladesh’s rise in limited-overs cricket has, in some ways, hindered their Test progress. The spectacle of ODI and T20 success has overshadowed the grind of Test cricket, influencing young cricketers to prioritize the former. Role models like Taskin Ahmed and Rubel Hossain, whose skills are better suited to the shorter formats, further perpetuate this trend. 

Even within the cricketing establishment, there seems to be a tacit acceptance of mediocrity in Test cricket. The lack of investment in nurturing a versatile bowling attack reflects a shortsighted approach that prioritizes immediate results in ODIs and T20s over the long-term development of Test cricketers. 

The Road Ahead

As Bangladesh prepares to face England, the challenge is not just about competing with one of the best teams in the world but about redefining their approach to Test cricket. The English batting lineup, disciplined and relentless, will test the Tigers in ways they are rarely tested. Without a balanced and incisive bowling attack, Bangladesh’s strategy of relying heavily on batting depth is unlikely to succeed. 

Virat Kohli’s assertion that “a bowler wins you a Test match” rings particularly true for Bangladesh. Until their think tank places greater emphasis on nurturing quality bowlers and adopts a more positive approach to the format, their Test journey will remain an uphill struggle. 

Test cricket, after all, is a game of character—a format where teams earn their respect not by merely surviving but by fighting to win. For Bangladesh, the time has come to abandon defensive strategies, invest in their bowling, and embrace the true spirit of Test cricket. Only then can they hope to forge a legacy in the game’s most demanding format

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Tale of Strategy and Composure: England Triumphs Over Bangladesh in Chittagong

The third One-Day International (ODI) between Bangladesh and England in Chittagong carried the weight of anticipation and uncertainty. With the series delicately poised at 1-1 and heavy rains lashing the city for days, cricket fans braced themselves for potential disappointment. The weather threatened to overshadow what promised to be an enthralling decider, especially since England had declined to use the reserve day. Yet, fate smiled on the cricketing world as the rains ceased, and the toss unfolded amid roaring cheers, setting the stage for a battle of wits and skills. 

A Pivotal Toss and a Tactical Beginning

England's captain, Jos Buttler, demonstrated astute tactical awareness by opting to bowl first under overcast skies on a pitch offering bounce and carry. It was a decision rooted in pragmatism, as the track was expected to ease for batting as the game progressed. Bangladesh’s opening duo, Tamim Iqbal and Imrul Kayes, approached the innings with caution, adopting a traditional method of survival rather than capitalizing on the bounce. While their circumspection was understandable, it lacked the flair needed to seize the initiative against a disciplined English attack. 

Buttler’s foresight came into play as he exploited the subdued approach of Bangladesh’s openers. Ben Stokes’ clever cross-seam delivery to Kayes—paired with a fielder stationed strategically at short leg—proved to be the first masterstroke. Kayes’ misjudged flick epitomized how pressure can force errors, gifting England an early breakthrough. 

Tamim, on the other hand, found a rhythm and partnered with Sabbir Rahman to lift the scoring rate, unfurling a flurry of pugnacious strokes. However, England’s strategy was calculated: Buttler unleashed Adil Rashid, who baited Tamim with a loose delivery outside off. Tamim, in his aggressive intent, played a rash stroke and fell prey to the trap. The wicket highlighted England’s ability to outthink their opponents, even at the cost of conceding boundaries. 

The Middle Overs: Bangladesh Falters Under Pressure

Mahmudullah Riyad’s dismissal off a harmless long-hop underscored a frustrating trait of Bangladesh’s batting—impatience against mediocrity. Rashid’s ploy to serve occasional loose deliveries worked, as Bangladeshi batsmen repeatedly took the bait. Despite a brief revival by Sabbir and Mushfiqur Rahim, the innings lost momentum with the dismissal of Shakib Al Hasan, a pivotal moment engineered by England’s spinners. 

The latter stages saw Rahim rekindle his touch, anchoring the innings to a modest total. Yet, with only 249 runs on the board, Bangladesh found themselves 30-40 runs short on a track that demanded a stronger finish. 

England’s Clinical Chase

England’s response was a masterclass in composure and precision. Unlike Bangladesh, they prioritized strike rotation over flamboyance, ensuring the pressure of the required run rate never mounted. Ben Duckett emerged as the architect of the chase, showcasing technical prowess and an authoritative sweep shot that neutralized the Bangladeshi spinners. His ability to accumulate runs with deft placements was a testament to his maturity as a batsman. 

The hallmark of England’s approach lay in their temperament. Partnerships flourished even after dismissals, as incoming batsmen seamlessly adapted to the situation. The middle overs, often the Achilles’ heel for chasing sides, became a stage for England to solidify their grip on the game. They refrained from rash risks, opting instead for calculated aggression, a strategy that paid dividends as they eased to victory. 

Bangladesh’s Shortcomings: Lessons to Be Learned

Bangladesh’s performance, though spirited, revealed familiar flaws. Their spinners faltered by relying on turn rather than bowling a disciplined line and length. The inability to contain England’s singles and twos compounded their woes, with fielding lapses punctuating a lacklustre display. While Mashrafe Bin Mortaza’s late resurgence hinted at resilience, it was not enough to unsettle England’s determination. 

A Contest of Contrasts

The third ODI was a microcosm of contrasting philosophies. While England exuded professionalism and clarity of purpose, Bangladesh seemed to waver under pressure, undermining their potential. Buttler’s captaincy, bolstered by a collective effort from bowlers and batsmen, stood out as a template for modern limited-overs cricket. 

For Bangladesh, the match served as a reminder of the importance of adaptability and discipline, qualities they must hone to compete against the best. As the series concluded, it left fans with both moments of brilliance and lessons for the future—a testament to the enduring allure of cricket. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Liton Das: A Beacon of Promise Amidst Chittagong’s Rain-Soaked Drama

In the humid embrace of a Bangladeshi summer, where the relentless sun exhausts both land and spirit, the arrival of rain is often celebrated as a divine reprieve. Yet, for cricket lovers, the monsoon often plays the antagonist, turning promising matches into soggy tales of what might have been. Such was the fate of the first Test between Bangladesh and South Africa in Chittagong—a game beautifully poised before torrential rain washed away the narrative of a potential historic triumph for the Tigers. 

While fans mourned the curtailed encounter, the preceding three days had already etched several positives into Bangladesh’s cricketing ledger. At the heart of these gains stood Liton Das, a young cricketer from Dinajpur whose steady rise through the ranks had culminated in a performance that silenced doubters and inspired dreams. 

A Rain-Drenched Glimpse of Promise 

The Test had unfolded with an unexpected twist: South Africa, a team known for their dominance, found themselves on the back foot from day one. Bangladesh, riding on improved tactics under Mushfiqur Rahim’s captaincy, showcased a level of discipline and resolve seldom associated with their Test performances against top-tier opposition. 

Among the standout contributions was Liton’s maiden Test fifty—a knock that transcended mere numbers. It was a statement of intent, forged in the crucible of pressure and adversity. Coming to the crease with Bangladesh still trailing by 53 runs and their top order back in the pavilion, Liton partnered with Shakib Al Hasan to stitch an 82-run stand that not only erased the deficit but handed Bangladesh a crucial lead. 

Liton Das: The Artist in the Making 

Liton’s innings was an exhibition of patience, composure, and technical brilliance. Gone were the flashy strokes and fleeting moments of brilliance that had once marked his game. Instead, he embraced restraint, meeting South Africa’s formidable pace attack with maturity beyond his years. 

Morne Morkel tested him with short-pitched deliveries, Dale Steyn probed with searing accuracy, and Vernon Philander sought to exploit any chink in his technique. Yet, Liton stood tall, his defensive technique as unyielding as the rainclouds above. His ability to read the game and adapt his approach was particularly striking—a clear sign of his evolution as a Test cricketer. 

As he settled, Liton unveiled his repertoire of elegant strokes. A cover drive off Morkel, timed so exquisitely that the ball seemed to glide through the covers, stood out as the shot of the day. It was not power but precision that defined him—a characteristic reminiscent of the legendary Mark Waugh. Liton’s back-foot play and wristy flicks, honed since his BKSP days, were on full display, reinforcing the belief that he is one of Bangladesh’s finest timers of the cricket ball. 

A Journey Rooted in Talent and Perseverance 

Liton’s journey to the Chittagong Test had been anything but straightforward. Hailing from Dinajpur, he first garnered attention during his time at BKSP, where his appetite for big scores set him apart. His performances in two consecutive Under-19 World Cups cemented his reputation as a technically sound batsman with a temperament suited for the longer format. 

His transition to domestic cricket was marked by consistency. By the 2014-15 season, he was the leading run-scorer in the National Cricket League and a standout performer in the Dhaka Premier League. These exploits earned him a national call-up, but his initial outings in limited-overs cricket revealed a penchant for flamboyance over consistency. 

However, the Liton who walked out at Chittagong was a transformed player. The weight of expectations, combined with competition for spots in the national team, seemed to have sharpened his focus. His ability to adapt to the demands of Test cricket—curbing his natural instincts and playing for the team—was evident throughout the innings. 

The Road Ahead 

Liton Das’s performance in Chittagong was not just a personal milestone but a testament to Bangladesh cricket’s growing depth. His solid technique, paired with an eye for timing, makes him a rare gem in Bangladesh’s batting lineup. While his drives and flicks evoke nostalgia for the artistry of Mark Waugh, his grit and adaptability speak of a player determined to carve his own legacy. 

As the rain robbed Bangladesh of a potential 1-0 series lead, it also left fans dreaming of what the future holds for Liton. He belongs higher up the order, where his technique and temperament can be fully utilized. If nurtured well, Liton Das has all the makings of becoming Bangladesh’s finest batsman—a player who doesn’t just perform but inspires. 

In the end, while Chittagong’s rain might have ended the match prematurely, it also heralded the arrival of a player destined to shine for Bangladesh, rain or shine.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Aftab Ahmed: The Tragic Decline of a Bright Talent

 Aftab Ahmed, once heralded as one of the most exciting talents to emerge from Bangladesh, remains a poignant example of what might have been. His cricketing journey was marked by flashes of brilliance, yet it ended far too soon, leaving behind a sense of lost promise and unrealized potential. The early excitement surrounding his career slowly faded into obscurity, a reminder of the fragility of even the brightest careers in the sport.

The Promise of a Chittagong Prodigy

Aftab’s story began in Chittagong, where, influenced by his father, he first embraced the game that would later define his life. His natural talent, especially his aggressive stroke play, quickly caught the eye of the national selectors. During the 2002 Under-19 World Cup, his fearless approach to batting stood out, garnering significant attention. His confidence and aggression were qualities that made him a compelling prospect for the future of Bangladeshi cricket.

In 2003, Aftab was included in the Bangladesh Test squad for a series against England, despite a somewhat underwhelming performance in the warm-up matches. His selection was met with scepticism, especially from local media, and it took another year before he made his debut. The road to recognition for Aftab, however, was only just beginning, and what followed would set the stage for a career that promised much but ultimately delivered far less than expected.

A Breakout Moment: The Rise of an All-Rounder

Aftab’s breakthrough came dramatically. During just his third One-Day International (ODI) at the Bangabandhu National Stadium in Dhaka, Bangladesh was defending a modest total of 146 runs against New Zealand. On paper, it appeared to be a simple chase for the Kiwis. However, Aftab's medium-paced bowling became the turning point. With a spell of inspired bowling, he single-handedly rattled New Zealand’s batting order, taking five wickets as the Kiwis collapsed from 76 for 1 to 133 for 7. Each of his dismissals was met with a smile—a mix of youthful exuberance and disbelief— as a previously silent crowd erupted in support. 

Although he had been selected as a batsman, Aftab’s performance with the ball that day marked the beginning of his evolution into an all-rounder. His role as a bowler became a fixture in most of his appearances, and it was clear that he could contribute with both bat and ball, a rare and valuable asset in the team. That day, he demonstrated a level of skill that went beyond mere technical ability—it was his innate sense of belief and his ability to perform under pressure that made him stand out.

The Batting Talent: A Celebration of Aggression

Aftab’s true calling, however, was with the bat. As a stroke-maker, he was a force to be reckoned with. His attacking style of play made him a crowd favourite, and he quickly became known for bulldozing bowlers with an array of powerful shots. He was happiest when driving the ball on the front foot, but could shift his balance with ease to pull or hook the ball when necessary. His cuts and lofted drives were executed with power and precision, and he was capable of improvising in ways that made his batting both exhilarating and unpredictable.

Yet, Aftab was not merely a reckless hitter. When the situation demanded, he demonstrated a maturity beyond his years, tempering his natural aggression and playing the role of a sheet anchor. He was involved in several key partnerships during his limited-overs career, anchoring the innings when required, and proving that he could adapt his game to the needs of the team. His versatility as a batsman—able to counter both spin and pace with equal flair—made him a significant asset for Bangladesh. Aftab’s batting was not just a display of technical ability; it was a celebration of the spirit of cricket itself—bold, fearless, and free-spirited.

The Downfall: A Career Cut Short

The turning point in Aftab’s career came in 2008, when, along with several national team players, he joined the rebel Indian Cricket League (ICL). The move resulted in a ten-year ban from the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB). Though Aftab eventually quit the ICL and expressed his willingness to return to national duty, his career never regained its former momentum. By the time he made his comeback, his confidence had been severely shaken, and his performance, once so promising, had begun to falter. He played his last match for Bangladesh in 2010, and after that, he slowly faded from the national consciousness, his name relegated to the annals of what could have been.

In recent years, Aftab announced his retirement from all forms of the game at the age of 29. The news was met with a sense of inevitability, as though his career had long been in decline. It is difficult to reconcile the premature end of such a promising career—one that had shown so much potential but failed to fulfil it. Aftab's retirement at such a young age serves as a tragic reminder of how fleeting success can be, and how quickly a career can be derailed by decisions both on and off the field.

The Bigger Picture: A Legacy of Unfulfilled Potential

Aftab Ahmed’s career is not an isolated case. Over the years, many promising talents have emerged from Bangladesh cricket, only to see their potential go unrealized. The question remains: why do such promising careers flame out prematurely? While there is no simple answer, a combination of factors—such as inconsistent management, lack of nurturing, and off-field distractions—have certainly played a role in thwarting the careers of many young cricketers.

The Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) must take a long, hard look at how it handles emerging talent. Instead of allowing raw potential to wither away due to a lack of proper development programs or strategic planning, the BCB must act as a responsible guardian of the country's cricketing future. The system should not just focus on producing players, but on ensuring that those players have the right environment to thrive and reach their full potential.

For Aftab, the story has already been written. His bright start, his early promise, and his sudden fall from grace will remain a tragic chapter in the history of Bangladesh cricket. But for the next generation of players, there is still hope. The BCB, the coaches, and the cricketing fraternity must learn from past mistakes and work together to create a system that nurtures and sustains talent, rather than letting it slip through their fingers.

As we look back on Aftab Ahmed’s career, we are reminded that the game is not just about the players who make it to the top—it is also about those who, for various reasons, never do. And in that, there is a great deal to learn. Aftab's story, though sad, is not the end of the road for Bangladeshi cricket. It should serve as a call to action—one that demands more care, more foresight, and more responsibility in preserving the country's cricketing future.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar

From Doubt to Determination: Bangladesh's Resurgence in Test Cricket

In the world of Test cricket, there’s a familiar refrain: “Who cares about Bangladesh?”The question, so often tossed around by non-Bangladeshi fans, reflects a longstanding scepticism. Since gaining Test status, the Tigers have endured years of disheartening defeats, each one reinforcing doubts about their place in the longest format. Critics have seldom shown sympathy, pointing out the lack of a consistent Test temperament and, at times, questioning the very credibility of Bangladesh as a Test-playing nation.

Yet, as time turns and experience grows, so too does potential. Change, after all, is inevitable, and Bangladesh has slowly but surely been learning the art of Test cricket. Thirteen years into their Test journey, some may wonder why progress has been slow, but growth is rarely linear. For Bangladesh, it’s been the slow-and-steady path, a deliberate effort to build a foundation that can eventually stand tall in the crucible of five-day cricket.

This cautious journey was evident in their recent Test series against New Zealand at Chittagong. As usual, the series drew little interest from international fans and was marred by the usual trolling of Bangladeshi cricketers on social media. But the Tigers responded in the best way they knew—on the field, with gritty and determined displays. 

New Zealand, after a formidable start, built an imposing first-innings total, with BJ Watling and Trent Boult’s last-wicket partnership dashing early Bangladeshi hopes. Facing such a total, Bangladesh's reputation suggested they might crumble. Early in their first innings, the script appeared to repeat itself, with both openers dismissed quickly, leaving the Tigers reeling at 8-2. But then, Mominul Haque, a young talent from Cox’s Bazar, took centre stage, picked over the more experienced Naeem Islam, and his response was emphatic. He shifted gears, punishing the New Zealand attack with striking ease, his offside stroke play a visual delight reminiscent of Kumar Sangakkara’s graceful precision.

While Mominul dazzled, doubts loomed—Bangladesh’s batsmen are known for bright starts that often fizzle out. But this time, Mominul found steady support from debutant Marshall Ayub, and a budding partnership helped steady the innings. As the match progressed, there were moments of peril; in the third morning, Marshall and Shakib fell in quick succession, reigniting fears of another collapse. Yet, a crucial partnership between Mominul and Mushfiqur Rahim followed, as the pair put on a 121-run stand for the fifth wicket, steering Bangladesh into safer waters. Mominul was denied a double century, and Mushfiq fell to a searing delivery from Doug Bracewell, yet Bangladesh resisted another collapse. Nasir Hossain and Sohag Gazi held firm with a 70-run stand, and although Nasir fell late in the day, Bangladesh's resolve was evident.

The fourth day saw Bangladesh’s tail wag ferociously. Sohag Gazi scored a spectacular century, while Robiul Islam provided a steady 33, propelling Bangladesh to a lead of 32. What began as a hope for survival became a memorable fightback, drawing Bangladesh close to a historic result. The final day held its own share of drama as Sohag Gazi etched his name in the record books with a hat-trick, becoming the first player in Test history to score a century, take a five-wicket haul, and secure a hat-trick in the same match. It was a remarkable feat, a gift for fans celebrating Durga Puja and Eid alike.

Beyond individual brilliance, something deeper has shifted in Bangladesh’s approach. Historically, the weight of a large total would have triggered panic, scattering partnerships and inviting collapses. But in Chittagong, Bangladesh’s batsmen showed newfound composure, and understanding when to attack and when to defend. The calmness under pressure, and the resilience to hold partnerships together—are qualities that signal a turning tide. Bangladesh may still have a way to go, but performances like these hint at a future where they can stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the world's Test elite.

Such spirited displays serve as a reminder of the importance of nurturing emerging cricketing nations. A few months ago, Zimbabwe outplayed Pakistan in an upset victory, yet their opportunities to play Test cricket remain limited. The broader cricketing world must realize that genuine growth cannot be confined to T20 tournaments or fleeting ODI series. Development should mean giving all teams, including those ranked lower, a fair shot at competing in Tests against the best.

Bangladesh’s journey in Test cricket underscores the value of patience and persistence. If cricket’s custodians are truly invested in a global game, they must ensure that opportunities for Test cricket are extended to all. For now, Chittagong serves as a reminder that Bangladesh is no longer content to simply participate—they are here to compete, and in time, to conquer.

 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

The Redemption at Mirpur: A Tale of Revenge and Reawakening

Cricket, in Bangladesh, is more than just a sport—it’s an emotional lifeline. When the Tigers collapsed for a mere 58 runs against the West Indies in a World Cup encounter at Mirpur, it wasn't just a loss—it was a national heartbreak. Fans were stunned, disheartened, and outraged. The dismal showing wasn’t just seen as a setback but as a blow to national pride, one that haunted both the players and their devoted supporters long after the game was over.  

Yet, in cricket, as in life, redemption is always around the corner. Bangladesh managed a tense victory against England in their next game, but the bitter taste of humiliation lingered. The desire for poetic justice grew stronger with every passing day. The Tigers and their passionate followers didn’t just crave a win—they longed for vengeance, the kind that would mirror the pain inflicted by the West Indies.

And when the opportunity arrived, the Tigers roared with fury.  

The Fire Rekindled  

After two underwhelming performances in the opening matches of the ODI series, Bangladesh's bowlers appeared to have lost their bite. But something shifted—whether it was pride, determination, or the sting of old wounds, the Tigers rediscovered their edge. The West Indies, confident and composed at 33 for 1, looked set for another solid performance. However, the mood changed in an instant.  

Enter Shakib Al Hasan, Bangladesh’s talisman. On this day, he wasn’t just a cricketer—he was a force of reckoning. With surgical precision, Shakib tore through the middle and lower order, turning the match on its head. His spell of 4 for 16 was more than just numbers; it was a performance laden with purpose, driven by a deep-seated desire to exorcise the ghosts of Mirpur. In the blink of an eye, the West Indian batting lineup, once brimming with confidence, crumbled. By the 22nd over, it was all over—their innings lay in ruins.  

A Nation Rejoices  

For Bangladesh, this victory wasn’t just a win on the scoreboard—it was emotional catharsis. Fans erupted in joy, their faith restored as the Tigers avenged their humiliation in the same ruthless manner they had once endured. The parallels with the World Cup collapse made the triumph even sweeter. It was as though the cricketing gods had granted Bangladesh the justice they so desperately sought.  

While the ODI series was lost, this particular win was a moment of immense satisfaction. It wasn’t just about levelling a score—it was about reclaiming lost pride and proving that the Tigers could roar when it mattered most.  

Beyond Revenge: A Glimpse of the Future  

Though revenge offers momentary gratification, this victory holds deeper significance for Bangladesh cricket. It serves as a reminder of the team’s potential and resilience. For a side that has often oscillated between brilliance and mediocrity, this win might become a turning point, injecting much-needed confidence and belief.  

At this moment, however, the nation's heart beats with joy. For now, it is enough to know that the pain of the past has been answered with a triumph that mirrors its depth. The Tigers have roared, and in doing so, they have reminded the world—and themselves—of their true spirit.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

 

Shafiul Islam: The Rise of a Fast-Bowling Successor?

In cricket, there are moments that either shatter a young player’s spirit or forge it into something indomitable. For a budding fast bowler, few experiences are as demoralizing as being torn apart by a batter as ruthless as Virender Sehwag. The Indian opener’s disdain for bowlers can reduce even the most promising pacers to rubble, and such was the baptism by fire for 21-year-old *Shafiul Islam* during the 2011 World Cup opener. Conceding runs in torrents, it would have been understandable if Shafiul's confidence crumbled under the weight of that nightmare. But in a tale of grit and resurgence, the young seamer bounced back with poise, delivering performances that not only restored his confidence but also solidified his place as a vital cog in Bangladesh’s cricketing machinery. 

 Adversity as a Catalyst for Growth

The pressure on Shafiul was immense even before the World Cup began. Bangladesh’s ace pacer, Mashrafe Mortaza, was sidelined with injury, and the burden of leading the pace attack fell on Shafiul’s shoulders. In a team that had long relied on Mortaza’s control and experience, expectations were heavy on the youngster to fill those shoes. Many would have faltered under such pressure, but Shafiul thrived, showing admirable self-belief. His early failure against Sehwag became a springboard for reflection and growth.

Against Ireland and the Netherlands, Shafiul turned things around. With accurate lines, sharp swing, and remarkable discipline, he bowled with a newfound sense of purpose. His comeback was more than just a statistic; it was a demonstration of resilience—proof that even when struck down, he could rise again stronger. 

A Lesson in Control and Craft

Shafiul’s early career had been marked by inconsistency. Although blessed with the natural ability to swing the ball, his control often deserted him, allowing batters to punish his wayward deliveries. His raw talent needed refining, and the arrival of *Ian Pont* as Bangladesh’s bowling coach proved to be a turning point. Under Pont’s guidance, Shafiul honed his precision, learned to maintain discipline, and refined his ability to read the game. The transformation was evident. What had once been a bowler prone to erratic spells became a weapon that Bangladesh could trust. 

In the World Cup match against Ireland, Shafiul wielded his late swing like a master craftsman. He bowled fuller lengths, teasing the edge of the bat, and moved the ball just enough to leave the Irish batters in disarray. Late swing—an art difficult to master—became a signature feature of his bowling, and he used it to devastating effect. The result? Ireland’s hopes were dismantled, one delivery at a time.

Against the Netherlands, Shafiul showcased a different facet of his skill set. His bowling spell wasn’t just effective; it was a tactical masterpiece. He varied his lengths, mixed yorkers with slower balls, and explored every angle. Despite going wicketless, his impact was profound—he tightened the screws, restricting the Dutch batsmen and paving the way for Bangladesh’s spinners, Shakib Al Hasan, Razzak, and Shuvo, to reap the rewards. His ability to operate without ego, to toil without immediate reward, revealed a maturity beyond his years. 

The Batting Hero Bangladesh Never Knew It Had

Shafiul’s heroics were not confined to the ball. When Bangladesh found themselves staring down the barrel against England at 169 for eight, needing 57 more runs for an unlikely victory, it seemed the match was all but over. Yet Shafiul, unshaken by the gravity of the situation, turned the game on its head with the bat.

In a calculated assault, he dismantled England’s premier spinner, Graeme Swann, smashing a four and a six in a critical 42nd over. His unbeaten 24 off 24 balls was nothing short of a masterstroke, blending composure with audacity. It was an innings that will live on in the annals of Bangladesh’s cricket history—not merely for the runs but for the spirit it embodied. Against all odds, Shafiul helped script one of the most memorable victories of the World Cup, breathing life into Bangladesh’s campaign and inspiring an entire nation. 

 A Successor to Mashrafe Mortaza?

Comparisons with *Mashrafe Mortaza* are inevitable, given the similarities in their roles. Mortaza’s influence on Bangladesh cricket has been unparalleled, with his ability to lead from the front and deliver in critical moments. But Shafiul is carving out his own identity, not by mimicking Mortaza’s pace but by bringing his unique strengths to the table—control, swing, and composure under pressure.

In Shafiul, Bangladesh has discovered more than just a replacement for Mortaza; they have found a bowler with the temperament to thrive on the big stage. His versatility as both a bowler and a lower-order batter adds valuable depth to the team. More importantly, his performances in the 2011 World Cup suggest that Bangladesh can look to the future with confidence. 

Forged in Fire, Rising in Glory

Shafiul Islam’s journey during the World Cup epitomizes the power of resilience. From being hammered mercilessly by Sehwag to delivering match-winning performances with both bat and ball, he has shown that setbacks are not the end but merely a part of the process. His transformation—fueled by discipline, self-belief, and the guidance of Ian Pont—has been remarkable.

Bangladesh cricket has often been defined by its stars—Tamim, Shakib, and Mortaza. But it is players like Shafiul, the ones who rise quietly from the shadows, who complete the story. His performances in the World Cup have not only eased the absence of Mortaza but also signalled the arrival of a new leader in the pace department.

In Shafiul, Bangladesh has found more than just an able bowler. They have found a fighter—a cricketer who refuses to be beaten, who embraces pressure as a challenge, and who delivers when it matters most. Whether with ball in hand or bat in the lower order, Shafiul has shown that he is more than just a supporting act. He is a player destined to leave a lasting mark on Bangladesh cricket.

 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

The Unsung Hero: Imrul Kayes and The Silent Symphony of Bangladesh’s Top Order

In cricket, a few batsmen stand out as ruthless marauders, born with an innate ability to dismantle bowling attacks. Players like Virender Sehwag, Sachin Tendulkar, Tillakaratne Dilshan, and Tamim Iqbal captivate fans with their sheer audacity. When these dashers are on the crease, they demand the spotlight, reducing the role of their batting partners to mere spectators. Yet, cricket is rarely a one-man show. At the other end of the pitch stands the unsung hero—steady, composed, and silently vital—whose role in anchoring the innings goes unnoticed but remains indispensable. For Bangladesh, that steady presence for many years has been Imrul Kayes.

The Enigma of Tamim Iqbal’s Explosive Brilliance

Tamim Iqbal, Bangladesh’s dashing opener, embodies a brand of cricket that sends adrenaline coursing through crowds. When his bat starts blazing, stadiums erupt with euphoria, craving every boundary with growing hunger. But with Tamim, the ecstasy is often short-lived. His dismissal casts an eerie silence over the ground, shifting the pressure squarely onto the shoulders of his teammates. Over the years, Bangladesh’s middle order has wavered under such pressure, often crumbling after Tamim’s exit. 

While Tamim’s brilliance can be exhilarating, his flamboyance comes with risks. He is not a batsman built to carry the innings to the end in the traditional sense. His game is about momentum, not longevity. Bangladesh, therefore, needed an opener with the temperament to build innings brick by brick—a stabilizing force who could hold one end, maintain composure, and rotate the strike without surrendering to the chaos. That steady hand would arrive in the form of Imrul Kayes.

A Rocky Start and a Turning Point

Kayes’s early career was far from impressive. After making his first-class debut in 2006, his initial years at the international level were riddled with inconsistency. He struggled in his Test debut against South Africa in 2008, scoring just 10 and 4 in two innings. His introduction to One-Day Internationals (ODIs) wasn’t much better, managing only 12 runs in his first outing against New Zealand. His batting in those formative years was frustrating—erratic, riddled with lapses in concentration, and lacking the patience required to construct meaningful innings. 

However, the year 2010 marked a turning point in Kayes’s career. On Bangladesh’s tour to New Zealand, he emerged as a different player—confident, focused, and deliberate. In that breakthrough year, Kayes amassed 867 runs in ODIs, finishing as the fifth-highest run-scorer of the year. His maiden ODI century came against New Zealand, a symbol of his newfound resilience and composure. From that moment, he began to redefine his role—not as a flashy crowd-pleaser but as a dependable innings-builder.

The Yin to Tamim’s Yang

Tamim and Kayes complement each other in a way that balances Bangladesh’s batting dynamics. Where Tamim dazzles with boundaries, Kayes anchors the innings with singles and well-placed twos. If Tamim is the lightning bolt that strikes fear into the bowlers, Kayes is the steady drizzle that quietly chips away at their resolve. His ability to rotate the strike, pick gaps in tight field settings, and keep the scoreboard ticking gives Bangladesh much-needed stability at the top of the order.

Though overshadowed by the explosive brilliance of “Boom-Boom” Tamim, Kayes's presence brings a calming effect to the innings. His game is built on patience rather than spectacle, endurance over extravagance. He has a knack for placing the ball into gaps with precision, reminiscent of Bangladesh’s batting pioneer, Aminul Islam. Over time, his appetite for runs has grown, and his knack for pacing an innings has earned him consecutive man-of-the-match awards—proof of his growing stature in the side.

The Redemption Arc: From Frustration to Mr. Dependable

For many years, Bangladesh’s top order suffered from instability. The absence of Shahriar Nafees, the country’s most elegant timer of the ball, left a gaping hole after his sudden exile from international cricket in 2008. Kayes was thrust into the spotlight, and though his initial performances were underwhelming, his transformation over time has been remarkable. By 2010, he had evolved into the dependable opener Bangladesh had long craved—someone who could drop anchor, absorb pressure and keep the innings afloat when the aggressive stroke-makers faltered.

Kayes’s value lies not only in his technical ability but also in his temperament. He puts a price on his wicket, rarely gifting it away as he once did. In an era where Bangladesh often relied on the brilliance of Tamim or the all-round genius of Shakib Al Hasan to win matches, Kayes emerged as the steady heartbeat of the batting order—quietly effective, relentlessly determined, and utterly reliable.

A Name Carved in Shadows

While Tamim Iqbal may continue to dominate headlines with his boundary-strewn innings, Imrul Kayes’s role in Bangladesh’s cricketing narrative is equally significant. Cricket, after all, is not only about fireworks but also about those who keep the flame burning through quiet, patient toil. Kayes’s contribution at the top of the order ensures that the flamboyance of others is not wasted.

As Bangladesh moves forward, the importance of having a player like Kayes—someone who thrives in the shadows—cannot be overstated. He is no longer just Tamim’s silent partner but a batsman who has etched his own name into the annals of Bangladesh cricket. The crowd may not erupt in applause for every single or two he scampers, but his innings serve as the foundation upon which greater victories are built. And in the end, every team needs a Kayes—an unsung hero who ensures the show goes on.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Heroism in Chittagong: How Mahmudullah and Shafiul Islam Rescued Bangladesh from the Abyss

Bangladesh cricket has often lived on the edge of heartbreak. The team’s penchant for batting collapses, especially under pressure, has become a frustrating pattern. When faced with adversity, cool heads tend to desert them, and the absence of a reliable finisher has haunted the side repeatedly. Against England in Chittagong, this familiar tale threatened to unravel again - only this time, two unlikely heroes emerged to rewrite the script and etch their names into Bangladesh’s cricketing folklore.

Another Collapse, Another Familiar Tale?

Bangladesh seemed to have built a stable foundation at 155 for 3, only for the innings to unravel spectacularly. Within minutes, the team slumped to 169 for 8, a collapse both brutal and all too familiar. The stadium, once throbbing with hope and excitement, emptied quickly, fans abandoning their seats in silent resignation. With 58 runs still required and only two wickets left, it looked like yet another chapter in Bangladesh’s saga of missed opportunities and failed chases.

The English bowlers smelled blood. Their deliveries were full of intent, brimming with energy, as they tore into the Bangladeshi lower order. Against this onslaught stood two cricketers: Mahmudullah Riyad - a composed yet uncelebrated figure in the middle order -  and Shafiul Islam, a tailender with no reputation to suggest he belonged on this stage. 

What followed was nothing short of extraordinary.

 Shafiul Islam: A Tailender Unleashed

The 42nd over became the turning point - not through textbook cricket but through sheer audacity. With Graeme Swann at the crease, few expected fireworks. But Shafiul Islam had other ideas. He wound up and hammered Swann’s fourth delivery over cover for four, a shot that dripped with an unexpected confidence. If that was a statement, the next ball was a declaration: Shafiul leaned back, swung hard, and dispatched Swann high over long-on for six. 

In that moment, the timid tailender transformed into a fearless striker. His eyes sparkled with intent, and his body language radiated defiance. Was this the same slender, quiet Shafiul? His bold stroke play was reminiscent of Mashrafe Mortaza on one of his more inspired days. The English bowlers, who had expected the tail to fold, suddenly found themselves facing a rejuvenated opponent. 

Shafiul’s burst of runs did more than just alter the scoreboard - it shattered England’s composure. It gave Bangladesh a foothold where none seemed possible, but the real architect of this remarkable recovery was the man at the other end: Mahmudullah Riyad. 

Mahmudullah Riyad: The Calm in the Chaos

If Shafiul’s aggression rattled England, it was Riyad’s unflinching composure that ensured Bangladesh stayed in the contest. Mahmudullah’s batting was a masterclass in situational awareness. He didn’t just block recklessly or succumb to pressure — he calculated every stroke, nudging singles and twos into gaps, never allowing England’s packed field to smother him. His boundaries were precise and deliberate, arriving only when the moment demanded them. There was no room for rashness or panic in Riad’s approach. 

While his teammates crumbled under pressure earlier in the innings, Riad embodied the qualities Bangladesh has long sought but rarely found in a middle-order batsman: patience, calm, and strategic brilliance. His temperament evoked memories of Michael Bevan and Mike Hussey - two legends renowned for steering their teams through the trickiest situations. Like them, Riyad possessed the ability to rotate strike effortlessly, offering his batting partner both support and confidence.

His quiet determination at the crease ensured that Shafiul’s adventurous strokes weren’t in vain. It was Riad’s reassuring presence that shielded the inexperienced tailender from undue pressure, giving him the freedom to attack. 

The Art of Finishing: Riyad’s Essential Role for Bangladesh

For a team that has long struggled with inconsistency, particularly in the middle order, Mahmudullah’s innings was a revelation. Bangladesh has often been guilty of leaving chases unfinished - undone by impulsive stroke-making and mental lapses. Riyad’s performance against England offered a glimpse of what the team could achieve with a dependable finisher at the helm. 

The question many fans asked in frustration after the India game - why was Riyad not utilized more often in key situations?  - Now found an answer. In Mahmudullah, Bangladesh has discovered a rare gem: a cricketer with the temperament to guide his team through turbulent waters and the skill to deliver under pressure. His absence from crucial moments in recent games left many wondering if the team was squandering a vital asset. 

 A Sting in the Tail: Shafiul’s Role in the Rescue Act

While Riyad provided the anchor, Shafiul’s contribution was no less significant. His fearless stroke play and refusal to buckle under pressure offered a glimpse into the hidden depths of Bangladesh’s tail. Though his reputation as a batsman was nonexistent, Shafiul’s heroics showed that sometimes courage and self-belief can outmatch even the most polished techniques. 

In a game that was slipping out of their grasp, it was these two unlikely heroes - one a cool-headed middle-order mainstay, the other a defiant tailender - who scripted a comeback for the ages. Their partnership didn’t just rescue Bangladesh from defeat; it embodied the "never-say-die" spirit that fans long to see in their team. 

 A Chapter for the Ages

When the final runs were scored and Bangladesh secured an unforgettable victory, the narrative had shifted. The familiar tale of collapse was replaced by one of resilience and redemption. Had it not been for Riyad’s calming influence and Shafiul’s fearless onslaught, the team would have fallen prey to criticism from pundits and the unforgiving ire of fans. Navjot Singh Sidhu’s taunts would have been relentless, and social media would have erupted in scorn from disappointed supporters. 

Instead, the victory at Chittagong became a story of heroes who defied expectations. For once, Bangladesh’s batting was not about what went wrong but about two individuals who did everything right. Mahmudullah Riyad emerged as the finisher Bangladesh had long sought, and Shafiul Islam provided a sting in the tail that no one saw coming. 

Together, they etched their names in the annals of Bangladesh cricket, turning what could have been yet another collapse into a shining example of courage and composure. Their partnership wasn’t just a victory for Bangladesh on the field - it was a promise of what the team could achieve with heart, grit, and belief.

 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar