Crack Down on the Bowlers by ICC: The Perils of Regulation and the Struggle for Innovation

Bangladesh cricket is at a crossroads. The national team’s ongoing struggles, marked by repeated defeats on the field and constant controversies off it, have cast a long shadow over the game in the country. For passionate Bangladeshi cricket fans, there has been little to celebrate recently, as the cricketing landscape remains dominated by disappointment, scandal, and uncertainty. Amid this tumult, a new controversy has emerged that threatens to further unravel the sport: the ICC's renewed crackdown on suspected illegal bowling actions.

The Crackdown on Bowling Actions

The recent news that Bangladesh fast bowler Al-Amin Hossain has been reported for a suspected illegal bowling action has sent shockwaves through the cricketing fraternity. Hossain, a promising talent, is the latest in a growing list of bowlers flagged by the ICC for their actions. He becomes the sixth player to be reported, joining a list that includes his compatriot Sohag Gazi, and becoming the first fast bowler from Bangladesh to face such scrutiny. The timing of this development has been particularly unsettling for the Bangladesh cricket community, already reeling from the national team’s poor performances.

This issue is not just about one player; it represents a broader concern over the ICC's increasingly stringent stance on what constitutes a ‘legal’ bowling action. For the governing body of world cricket, the message is clear: the integrity of the game must be upheld, and any action that threatens the fairness and spirit of the game must be rooted out. The crackdown on illegal bowling actions, however, raises complex questions about fairness, innovation, and the evolution of the sport.

A Renewed War on ‘Illegal’ Actions

The ICC's focus on illegal bowling actions has intensified in recent years, with the governing body implementing new measures to ensure that bowlers’ actions are within the regulations. In June, during an ICC Cricket Committee meeting, the governing body expressed concerns over the effectiveness of the biomechanical lab at the University of Western Australia in Perth, which has long been the standard for testing bowling actions. As a result, the ICC has moved to accredit other biomechanics labs around the world to offer greater support to match officials and ensure that suspected illegal actions are accurately identified.

This renewed scrutiny has had its fair share of casualties. Bowlers like Sri Lanka’s Sachithra Senanayake, New Zealand’s Kane Williamson, and Pakistan’s Saeed Ajmal have all been banned or suspended after their actions were deemed illegal by the ICC. Ajmal's suspension in 2013, which declared his action illegal for all deliveries, shocked the cricket world and marked a turning point in the ICC’s approach to illegal actions.

While the ICC’s drive to uphold the integrity of the game is commendable, it raises serious concerns about the implications for bowlers, particularly those whose actions fall within a grey area. The focus on biomechanics, while scientifically rigorous, risks overlooking the nuances and complexities of bowling as an art form. The more rigid the rules become, the more constrained bowlers feel, particularly those who rely on subtle variations in their actions to deceive batsmen.

A Crisis of Confidence: Muttiah Muralitharan and the Legacy of Innovation

The ICC's growing scrutiny of bowling actions inevitably leads to questions about its approach to legendary bowlers whose actions were once considered to be within the legal parameters but are now coming under fresh examination. The case of Muttiah Muralitharan, one of the greatest bowlers in cricket history, is particularly pertinent. Muralitharan, whose action was deemed legal by the University of Western Australia’s biomechanics lab, is now caught in the crosshairs of a broader debate about what constitutes a 'legal' action.

If the ICC is now dissatisfied with the results of the biomechanics lab in Perth, should it re-evaluate the validity of bowlers who have passed through it, including Muralitharan? This hypothetical scenario is not as far-fetched as it might seem, especially considering the evolving nature of biomechanics and the increasing scrutiny placed on bowling actions in the modern game. The very idea of reopening Muralitharan's case sends a chilling message to current and future bowlers: innovation, no matter how brilliant or effective, is under constant threat.

The Stifling of Innovation

At the heart of the debate over illegal bowling actions lies a deeper issue: the growing stifling of bowling innovation. Over the years, the ICC's increasing regulation of bowling actions has created an environment where bowlers are afraid to experiment. What was once celebrated as the art of deception—the subtle variations in pace, spin, and angle that make bowling such a fascinating and complex discipline—has now become a minefield of legal boundaries.

The fear of having a unique delivery reported as illegal has led to many bowlers, particularly spinners, retreating into more orthodox, and sometimes less effective, methods. The doosra, a delivery popularized by the likes of Saeed Ajmal and Muttiah Muralitharan, has become a symbol of the battle between innovation and regulation. It is now regarded with suspicion, despite being one of the most ingenious deliveries in the game. Similarly, reverse swing bowling, once a hallmark of fast bowling, is now viewed with wariness, as bowlers fear being branded as violators of the laws of cricket.

This growing fear of innovation threatens the very essence of the game. Cricket, like all sports, evolves through the ingenuity of its players. Just as batsmen are encouraged to experiment with new shots, such as the reverse sweep or switch-hit, bowlers too should have the freedom to innovate within the rules. If we accept that a batsman can change the way the game is played with a new stroke, why should a bowler be penalized for developing a new delivery?

The Need for Balance

As the ICC continues its battle against illegal actions, there is a pressing need for a more balanced approach—one that recognizes the importance of both fairness and innovation. There is no doubt that the integrity of the game must be protected, but this should not come at the cost of stifling the creative spirit that has made cricket such a dynamic and evolving sport.

The ICC must strike a delicate balance, allowing bowlers to push the boundaries of their craft while ensuring that they remain within the parameters of fairness. This may mean revisiting some of the existing rules and guidelines surrounding bowling actions to ensure they reflect the changing nature of the game and the challenges faced by bowlers in a modern cricketing landscape. Just as the laws of batting have evolved over time to accommodate innovation, so too should the laws governing bowling.

Ultimately, cricket must remain a place where both batsmen and bowlers can express their skills and creativity without fear of being unfairly punished. The ICC's role is not only to regulate but also to foster the growth and evolution of the game. By doing so, it can ensure that the game remains both fair and vibrant and that the innovations of today’s bowlers are not tragically lost to the past.

In the end, cricket’s future lies in finding harmony between the strictures of fairness and the freedom of creativity. The question remains: will the ICC rise to the challenge? Or will it continue down a path that risks suffocating the very innovations that have made the game what it is today?

 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Bangladesh Cricket at Crossroads: Lessons from a Misstep Against Sri Lanka

Before the opening Test against Sri Lanka at Mirpur, Bangladesh cricket stood at a crossroads, shadowed by uncertainty. In a tense and politically charged atmosphere, only a display of character on the field could have lifted spirits. Expectations were high; after years of learning the nuances of Test cricket, Bangladesh had shown incremental improvement. But hopes were dashed, as Bangladesh’s performance fell short, revealing both tactical missteps and missed opportunities.

The root of the problem lay in an ill-prepared team and management strategy that ignored Bangladesh’s historical strengths. Spin has long been the weapon of choice for Bangladesh, especially on home soil. Yet, the team opted for three pace bowlers, an unusual move considering Bangladesh’s limited options in quality seam bowling outside of the experienced Mashrafe Mortaza. This decision seemed less tactical and more aspirational as if hoping for a quick solution to years of pace-bowling limitations.

Bangladesh’s approach was complicated by a widespread call among players and management for “sporting” tracks—bouncier, livelier surfaces that could offer an equal contest between bat and ball. While this ambition mirrors Bangladesh’s desire to grow as a cricketing nation, it raises an important question: are the players ready for such tracks? Bangladesh’s domestic circuit has traditionally featured flat pitches, ideal for batting but ineffective for preparing players for the conditions of a sporting wicket. Developing skill on these surfaces requires a gradual, systemic shift starting at the domestic level, where batsmen can learn to handle movement, bounce, and carry. Without this foundation, the call for sporting tracks risks backfiring.

The decision to trust in an untested pace attack quickly unravelled. While the Mirpur pitch showed early promise, the surface soon revealed itself as typically subcontinental—flat and slowing as the game progressed. Sri Lankan bowler Shaminda Eranga was able to generate bounce later on, but this success owed more to his own abilities than to any inherent quality in the pitch. Rather than attempting to counter these conditions with spin, captain Mushfiqur Rahim stuck to a pace-spin combination that often neutralized the momentum generated by Shakib Al Hasan. His handling of Sohag Gazi, a reliable wicket-taker, was particularly puzzling; used sparingly on the second day, Gazi was brought on too late to make a difference, despite proving his effectiveness whenever he was introduced.

Mushfiqur Rahim’s captaincy displayed a blend of skill and inconsistency. While undoubtedly talented and capable of inspiring his team, his choices sometimes seemed emotionally driven rather than grounded in tactical insight. The sporadic use of Gazi, combined with a reliance on outmatched pacers, allowed Sri Lanka to settle into comfortable partnerships. A more strategic use of Bangladesh’s spinners in tandem could have kept the Sri Lankan batsmen under greater pressure, creating opportunities to gain control of the game.

Adding to these tactical missteps was Bangladesh’s erratic batting approach, which appeared more suited to the rhythm of limited-overs cricket. At a moment when patience and resilience were crucial, key players like Tamim Iqbal, Mominul Haque, and Shakib Al Hasan adopted a casual, almost reckless approach, throwing away wickets with poorly judged shots. This lack of Test match temperament was evident as players abandoned the methods they had previously used to anchor the innings and resist opposition pressure.

Bangladesh’s task ahead of the second Test is to revisit and strengthen its basics. The challenge is not simply to avoid defeat but to develop a mindset focused on long-form cricket—a mindset that values patience, strategic shot selection, and judicious use of resources. Playing for a draw should not be the goal of a team with over a decade of Test experience; rather, the objective should be to craft performances that demonstrate skill, adaptability, and resilience to contend with the demands of Test cricket.

Bangladesh cricket has made remarkable strides over the years, and the fans’ expectations are a testament to this progress. However, to truly honour the promise of this growth, the team must recalibrate its approach and embrace its unique strengths. Spin, methodical batting, and disciplined captaincy have been the hallmarks of Bangladesh’s best performances. By grounding its strategy in these qualities, Bangladesh can hope to not only improve but to compete in the highest tiers of world cricket. As they approach the second Test, Bangladesh must remember that while learning to save matches is essential, learning to win them defines a team’s future.

Thank You
Faisal Caesar

Unleashing Potential: Sohag Gazi's Historic Performance Marks a New Era for Bangladesh Cricket

Corey Anderson, New Zealand's left-arm medium pacer, raised a spirited appeal for leg-before against Mominul Haque. When the umpire’s finger rose, it signalled the end of one of Bangladesh’s finest Test innings, as well as an inspiring 121-run stand between Mominul and Mushfiqur Rahim. The very next over, Doug Bracewell delivered a fearsome short ball to Mushfiqur, and the Bangladeshi captain had no answer. The quick wickets brought back memories of familiar collapses, the kind that have too often defined Bangladesh’s Test innings. Nasir Hossain, renowned for his calculated aggression, was left to continue his charge—but he needed someone with equal resolve to see him through.

In past Tests, Mahmudullah often fulfilled this role, coming in at number seven or eight, stabilizing partnerships with careful strike rotation and flashes of aggression. Typically, Bangladesh selected a specialist batsman at number eight, adding depth to their lineup. But in the Chittagong Test, the team made a bold move: Mahmudullah was left out, and they entrusted all-rounder Sohag Gazi with the responsibility. Although Gazi’s bowling had earned him his international reputation, his domestic batting prowess was well known. It was a test of his mettle, and what followed was nothing short of extraordinary.

The next day began with a setback, as Nasir mistimed a pull shot, and Bangladesh ended the day still trailing New Zealand by 89 runs. Early on the fourth morning, Abdur Razzak fell quickly, leaving a useful lead tantalizingly close for New Zealand. But then, Gazi transformed the narrative, digging in and taking on the Kiwi bowlers with audacity and skill.

It was a masterclass of counter-attacking batting. Gazi’s pugnacious cover drives, deft late cuts, and thumping slogs through mid-wicket stunned the Kiwis, who watched their advantage slip away as the lead narrowed. Together with Robiul Islam, Gazi crafted a 105-run ninth-wicket partnership, dragging Bangladesh into the lead. His hundred, a remarkable feat under immense pressure, turned the spotlight onto his often-overlooked batting abilities. Yet his contributions were far from over.

When New Zealand resumed batting in their second innings, their aggressive approach suggested an imminent declaration, with the lead nearing a safe total. But Gazi, unwilling to relent, took up the ball and orchestrated a spell that would enter the annals of Test cricket history. On a pitch offering little assistance to spinners, Gazi’s skill and guile came to life.

His first scalp was the formidable Brendon McCullum, whom he bowled just as the Kiwis were building dangerous momentum. Then, in a thrilling turn, Gazi unleashed a devastating over. Corey Anderson was the first to go, trapped lbw, and BJ Watling, who had scored a century in the first innings, soon edged a sharply bouncing delivery to the wicketkeeper. Bracewell arrived at the crease, tasked with thwarting Gazi’s hat-trick attempt, but Gazi had other plans. He sent down a vicious arm-ball that glanced off Bracewell’s bat, deflecting from the wicketkeeper's gloves to slip, where Shakib Al Hasan snatched it with a one-handed leap. The stadium erupted. Gazi’s feat—a hundred, a five-wicket haul, and a hat-trick in the same Test—made him the first cricketer in history to achieve such a milestone.

Sohag Gazi’s story is one of determination and adaptability. Although he may not have the natural flair of Nasir Hossain or Mominul Haque, Gazi's grit and tireless work ethic have fueled his rapid growth since his debut against the West Indies. He may not yet be fully established in the team, but his fearless display at Chittagong showed a cricketer of extraordinary potential, a player willing to fight until the end. 

In the years ahead, Gazi's future appears bright. His performance not only underscored his own promise but also sent a clear message to the cricketing world: Bangladesh’s players are learning, growing, and achieving, slowly carving out a place for themselves in the Test arena. With hard work and resilience, the Tigers are laying the groundwork for a new era in their cricketing journey.

 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

From Doubt to Determination: Bangladesh's Resurgence in Test Cricket

In the world of Test cricket, there’s a familiar refrain: “Who cares about Bangladesh?”The question, so often tossed around by non-Bangladeshi fans, reflects a longstanding scepticism. Since gaining Test status, the Tigers have endured years of disheartening defeats, each one reinforcing doubts about their place in the longest format. Critics have seldom shown sympathy, pointing out the lack of a consistent Test temperament and, at times, questioning the very credibility of Bangladesh as a Test-playing nation.

Yet, as time turns and experience grows, so too does potential. Change, after all, is inevitable, and Bangladesh has slowly but surely been learning the art of Test cricket. Thirteen years into their Test journey, some may wonder why progress has been slow, but growth is rarely linear. For Bangladesh, it’s been the slow-and-steady path, a deliberate effort to build a foundation that can eventually stand tall in the crucible of five-day cricket.

This cautious journey was evident in their recent Test series against New Zealand at Chittagong. As usual, the series drew little interest from international fans and was marred by the usual trolling of Bangladeshi cricketers on social media. But the Tigers responded in the best way they knew—on the field, with gritty and determined displays. 

New Zealand, after a formidable start, built an imposing first-innings total, with BJ Watling and Trent Boult’s last-wicket partnership dashing early Bangladeshi hopes. Facing such a total, Bangladesh's reputation suggested they might crumble. Early in their first innings, the script appeared to repeat itself, with both openers dismissed quickly, leaving the Tigers reeling at 8-2. But then, Mominul Haque, a young talent from Cox’s Bazar, took centre stage, picked over the more experienced Naeem Islam, and his response was emphatic. He shifted gears, punishing the New Zealand attack with striking ease, his offside stroke play a visual delight reminiscent of Kumar Sangakkara’s graceful precision.

While Mominul dazzled, doubts loomed—Bangladesh’s batsmen are known for bright starts that often fizzle out. But this time, Mominul found steady support from debutant Marshall Ayub, and a budding partnership helped steady the innings. As the match progressed, there were moments of peril; in the third morning, Marshall and Shakib fell in quick succession, reigniting fears of another collapse. Yet, a crucial partnership between Mominul and Mushfiqur Rahim followed, as the pair put on a 121-run stand for the fifth wicket, steering Bangladesh into safer waters. Mominul was denied a double century, and Mushfiq fell to a searing delivery from Doug Bracewell, yet Bangladesh resisted another collapse. Nasir Hossain and Sohag Gazi held firm with a 70-run stand, and although Nasir fell late in the day, Bangladesh's resolve was evident.

The fourth day saw Bangladesh’s tail wag ferociously. Sohag Gazi scored a spectacular century, while Robiul Islam provided a steady 33, propelling Bangladesh to a lead of 32. What began as a hope for survival became a memorable fightback, drawing Bangladesh close to a historic result. The final day held its own share of drama as Sohag Gazi etched his name in the record books with a hat-trick, becoming the first player in Test history to score a century, take a five-wicket haul, and secure a hat-trick in the same match. It was a remarkable feat, a gift for fans celebrating Durga Puja and Eid alike.

Beyond individual brilliance, something deeper has shifted in Bangladesh’s approach. Historically, the weight of a large total would have triggered panic, scattering partnerships and inviting collapses. But in Chittagong, Bangladesh’s batsmen showed newfound composure, and understanding when to attack and when to defend. The calmness under pressure, and the resilience to hold partnerships together—are qualities that signal a turning tide. Bangladesh may still have a way to go, but performances like these hint at a future where they can stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the world's Test elite.

Such spirited displays serve as a reminder of the importance of nurturing emerging cricketing nations. A few months ago, Zimbabwe outplayed Pakistan in an upset victory, yet their opportunities to play Test cricket remain limited. The broader cricketing world must realize that genuine growth cannot be confined to T20 tournaments or fleeting ODI series. Development should mean giving all teams, including those ranked lower, a fair shot at competing in Tests against the best.

Bangladesh’s journey in Test cricket underscores the value of patience and persistence. If cricket’s custodians are truly invested in a global game, they must ensure that opportunities for Test cricket are extended to all. For now, Chittagong serves as a reminder that Bangladesh is no longer content to simply participate—they are here to compete, and in time, to conquer.

 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar