When Heroes Go Quiet: Tamim Iqbal’s Moral Collapse

Tamim Iqbal’s greatest achievement in Bangladeshi cricket may not be his runs, but his mastery of timing - political timing, narrative timing, and most importantly, self-preserving timing.

For nearly two decades, Tamim cultivated the image of the defiant batsman, the man of the people, the torchbearer of Bangladesh’s cricketing pride. Yet when the people themselves needed voices of moral clarity, that image dissolved into studied silence. This silence was not accidental. It was strategic.

Tamim belongs to a powerful trinity, alongside Mashrafe Bin Mortaza and Shakib Al Hasan, that transformed Bangladeshi cricket from a sporting institution into a carefully managed ecosystem of influence, patronage, and selective outrage. Cricket, already weakened by syndicates and opaque power structures, became further politicized, not through resistance, but through compliance.

What separates Tamim from the fans who sustained him is not class or fame, but conscience.

In 2024, when innocent lives were lost amid national turmoil, the silence from Bangladesh’s most powerful cricketing voices was deafening. Long before that, when a prominent and widely admired figure was murdered in broad daylight, Tamim and his contemporaries chose discretion over dissent. In moments when moral neutrality itself becomes a political act, silence is not innocence, it is alignment.

Throughout his career, Tamim demonstrated a consistent pattern: confrontation only when it is safe, emotion only when it benefits him, and rebellion only when it can be theatrically contained. His much-publicized emotional episodes, particularly the 2023 retirement drama, were not acts of protest but performances of control, designed to redirect public sympathy while leaving entrenched power structures untouched.

This is where Tamim’s opportunism becomes undeniable.

Like Mashrafe and Shakib, Tamim learned early that in Bangladesh, sporting stardom can be leveraged into political capital without ever paying the price of political responsibility. He learned that remaining useful to power is safer than being accountable to the public. And so, even today, he continues to serve interests larger than cricket and far removed from the fans whose devotion built his legacy.

Harsh criticism, therefore, is not cruelty, it is consequence.

When public figures enjoy extraordinary privilege while refusing moral accountability, they invite scrutiny. When they benefit from systems that suppress dissent, they become collaborators—willing or otherwise. And when they repeatedly choose self-interest over solidarity, history remembers them not as heroes, but as enablers.

Tamim Iqbal’s tragedy is not that he failed Bangladesh cricket. It is that, when Bangladesh itself was tested, he chose comfort over courage.

And for collaborators of authoritarian systems, silence, no matter how polished, is never neutral.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Bangladesh’s Politics of Distraction: When Power Plays Cricket and Crisis Becomes Theatre

Bangladesh never runs short of spectacle. Every sunrise delivers a new headline, every sunset a fresh controversy, and almost without exception, the resolution arrives at the same address. At the centre of every crisis, real or manufactured, stands Sheikh Hasina, cast once again as the nation’s indispensable problem-solver.

Over time, this has become a ritual. Institutions malfunction, officials stumble, boards collapse into infighting, and then the Prime Minister is summoned, as if dysfunction itself were merely a prelude to her intervention. From governance to sports, the pattern is painfully familiar: chaos below, decree above.

What should alarm us is not that Sheikh Hasina intervenes, but that the system appears designed to require her intervention.

Cricket: The Nation’s Favourite Distraction

For more than a decade, cricket has served as Bangladesh’s most reliable escape hatch — a space where national frustration is suspended for ninety overs and patriotic emotion is safely redirected. What once united the country has now devolved into a theatre of egos, melodrama, and political patronage, where professionalism routinely bows to personality.

Cricket, in Bangladesh, no longer functions as a sport alone. It is a soap opera — endlessly episodic, predictable in structure, and immune to reform.

And in the latest episode, the lead role was played by Tamim Iqbal.

Tears, Timing, and Theatre

Barely three months before a World Cup, Tamim — the most recognisable opener of the last sixteen years — announced an abrupt retirement from international cricket. The setting was Chattogram. The delivery was tearful. The cameras were ready.

The timing was impeccable: the announcement came a day after a meek defeat to Afghanistan. The press feasted. Talk shows dissected. Social media erupted. It was grief, vulnerability, and spectacle packaged for national consumption.

Then came the inevitable twist.

Within twenty-four hours, Tamim reversed his decision after a three-hour meeting, not with selectors, coaches, or medical staff, but with the Prime Minister herself. Also present, predictably, was Mashrafe Bin Mortaza, because no Bangladeshi drama is complete without a familiar chorus.

A question of form, fitness, and discipline had now been elevated into a matter of political reconciliation.

Politics in the Pavilion

The Bangladesh Cricket Board is frequently described as “autonomous.” Yet when the Prime Minister must mediate between the board president, the captain, and a former fast bowler-turned-MP, the word loses all meaning.

Is Sheikh Hasina non-political?

Is Mashrafe non-political?

Of course not.

Their presence transforms every cricketing decision into a political statement. It blurs the already fading line between governance and showmanship. Cricket becomes governed by proxy, and governance becomes performance.

This is not leadership. It is a theatre.

Decline, Discipline, and the Blame Game

Lost beneath the melodrama is an inconvenient reality: Tamim Iqbal has been in visible physical decline. His chronic back issues are no secret. His mobility has reduced. His discipline and availability have repeatedly come into question.

Before the first ODI against Afghanistan, Tamim admitted he was “not 100% fit.” The response from BCB president Nazmul Hassan was not an internal review, but a public outburst, delivered to the media, not the dressing room.

That single moment triggered national chaos. Criticism intensified. Ego bruised. Pressure mounted. Tamim quit — and then, under political spotlight, un-quit.

Not resolved by coaches.

Not resolved by doctors.

Not resolved by administrators.

Resolved by Sheikh Hasina.

This is not crisis management. It is an institutional surrender.

The Numbers That No One Wants to See

Beyond sentiment and symbolism, Bangladesh’s cricketing failures are painfully quantifiable.

Since 2019, Powerplay statistics tell a grim story:

Strike rate: 68.95

Average: 30.09 (49 innings)

Runs: 2257

Wickets lost: 75

Elite teams use the Powerplay to dominate. Bangladesh uses it to survive.

Yet instead of confronting structural flaws — batting intent, fitness culture, long-term planning  the national conversation orbits around reconciliations, egos, and emotional performances.

It is easier to host tea at Ganabhaban than to overhaul cricketing logic.

The Real Tragedy

This saga is not about Tamim alone. It is about an ecosystem addicted to dysfunction.

Players behave like celebrities.

Boards behave like politicians.

Politicians behave like selectors.

When a Prime Minister must personally mediate a captain’s retirement, the problem is no longer in the dressing room. It is systemic.

Bangladesh does not suffer from a shortage of emotion. It suffers from a shortage of accountability.

A Republic of Permanent Circus

Bangladesh today resembles a travelling circus that never packs up its tents. Every morning unveils a new act, every evening a fresh spectacle. At the centre of the ring stands the ringmaster, omnipresent, omnipotent, and carefully projected as the solution to everything.

Domestic failures are elevated into matters of “state concern.” Cameras roll. Headlines scream. The public applauds, while inflation rises, institutions decay, and responsibility quietly exits through the back door.

Tamim’s initial retirement may have been sensible, even dignified. Its reversal turned resolve into farce. By seeking political intervention, a cricketing decision was transformed into a loyalty performance. In the process, credibility was sacrificed at the altar of proximity to power.

And so the circus continues.

The ringmaster smiles.

The spotlight shifts.

The crowd applauds.

What it costs us, seriousness, standards, and self-respect, goes largely unnoticed.

Until the theatre ends, every crisis will demand the same tired conclusion:

“Hasina has solved it.”

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Tamim Iqbal: Inheriting the Mantle Amidst Uncertainty

The world stands on edge, consumed by a crisis unprecedented in its global reach. SARS-CoV-2, the virus that emerged from China, has cast a shadow over nations, economies, and lives. Fear has gripped humanity, spreading faster than the virus itself. While the world grapples with this pandemic, Bangladesh, too, finds itself navigating the early stages of this crisis. With three confirmed cases of COVID-19, the nation remains vigilant, yet cautiously optimistic that it will avoid the catastrophic scenarios witnessed in countries like China, Italy, and Iran. 

But even as the spectre of the virus looms large, life in Bangladesh moves forward. In stark contrast to countries where sporting events have been halted, cricket in Bangladesh continues to weave its magic. Against this backdrop, the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) has announced Tamim Iqbal as the new captain of the ODI team, succeeding the iconic Mashrafe Bin Mortaza. 

The decision signals the dawn of a new era in Bangladesh cricket, but it also raises critical questions: Can Tamim shoulder the immense responsibility of captaincy while maintaining his prowess as a batsman? And will he rise to the occasion in the shadow of Mashrafe’s legacy? 

Tamim’s First Stint: A Bitter Prelude

Tamim’s leadership journey is not without precedent, albeit one marked by disappointment. When he led Bangladesh during the Sri Lanka tour in 2019, the results were dismal. A whitewash at the hands of the hosts was compounded by Tamim’s uninspiring performance with the bat—scores of 0, 19, and 2 in three matches. His captaincy on the field, too, failed to ignite confidence, leaving fans and analysts questioning his ability to handle the dual pressures of leadership and personal performance. 

However, one failure does not define a captain. Leadership is as much about learning from setbacks as it is about celebrating triumphs. Tamim now has the opportunity to rewrite that chapter, but it will require introspection, adaptability, and an unrelenting commitment to growth. 

The Anatomy of Leadership in Cricket

Captaincy in cricket is a crucible that tests not just skill but character. A captain’s every move—his batting, his field placements, his demeanour under pressure—is scrutinized. In longer formats, leadership demands a rare combination of tactical acumen, emotional intelligence, and the ability to inspire. 

Tamim, by all accounts, is a player of immense talent. His evolution as a batsman, particularly since overcoming a rough patch in 2014, reflects his ability to adapt and persevere. Known for his aggressive style, Tamim has tempered his natural flair with a more calculated approach, becoming one of Bangladesh’s most reliable run-scorers. 

Yet, leadership is a different beast. It demands not just personal excellence but the ability to elevate the entire team. A captain must be a strategist, a motivator, and, above all, a calming presence in the face of adversity. This is where Tamim faces his greatest challenge. 

Temperament: The Achilles’ Heel?

One of the criticisms often levelled at Tamim is his temperamental nature. Leadership requires calm and composure, especially in high-pressure situations. The ability to think clearly and make decisions under duress is what separates good captains from great ones.  

Mashrafe Bin Mortaza, Tamim’s predecessor, embodied this quality. Even during the most challenging phases, Mashrafe’s calm demeanour and unyielding optimism inspired confidence. For Tamim to succeed, he must channel similar composure, learning to manage both his emotions and the expectations of a cricket-obsessed nation. 

There are signs that Tamim has matured. The experience of international cricket, coupled with the responsibility of being one of Bangladesh’s senior players, has likely instilled a deeper understanding of the game’s intricacies. But maturity alone will not suffice. Tamim must demonstrate that he can balance the demands of captaincy with his primary role as a batsman. 

The Legacy of Mashrafe and the Road Ahead

The shadow of Mashrafe’s legacy looms large. As a leader, Mashrafe was more than a captain; he was a symbol of resilience and hope. Under his stewardship, Bangladesh cricket achieved unprecedented success, earning respect on the global stage. Replacing such a figure is no small task, and comparisons will be inevitable. 

Tamim must navigate this transition with grace, focusing on building his own legacy rather than emulating Mashrafe’s. His first priority must be to lead by example. Consistent performances with the bat will not only boost his confidence but also inspire his teammates. 

At the same time, Tamim must hone his skills as a tactician. Cricket is a game of strategy, and a captain’s ability to outthink the opposition often determines the outcome. Tamim’s experience and cricketing intelligence will be crucial, but he must also be willing to learn and adapt. 

A Test of Faith and Patience

While some argue that Mahmudullah Riyad would have been a safer choice for captaincy, the BCB’s decision to invest in Tamim reflects a long-term vision. The board’s faith in him must now be matched by his performance. 

The road ahead will be challenging. Tamim will face scrutiny, criticism, and moments of self-doubt. But within these challenges lie opportunities—to grow, to lead, and to inspire. 

As Bangladesh embarks on this new chapter, the nation must rally behind its captain. For Tamim, this is more than just a role; it is a chance to etch his name in the annals of Bangladesh cricket history. 

In the words of Mashrafe himself, leadership is about courage, composure, and commitment. Tamim Iqbal has the potential to embody these qualities. Now, it is up to him to prove that he can carry the torch forward, lighting the way for the Tigers in the years to come. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar  

Rain, Resilience, and Rib-Line Fury: Bangladesh’s Fragile Middle Order Exposed

The first two days of the Wellington Test were drenched in relentless downpour, casting doubts over whether the match would see any meaningful play. When the rain finally relented, the grey clouds overhead still threatened another interruption. Despite the truncated schedule, over 70 overs of cricket unfolded, offering a microcosm of the challenges and beauty of the game: Neil Wagner’s rib-crunching hostility, a masterful cameo from Tamim Iqbal, and the recurring frailty of Bangladesh’s middle order under pressure. 

Tamim and Shadman: A Beacon of Hope

On a lush green pitch—reminiscent of a bygone era—Bangladesh’s openers, Tamim Iqbal and Shadman Islam, rose above the occasion. The duo replicated their success from Hamilton, stitching together their third consecutive fifty-run partnership in New Zealand. Such consistency from Bangladeshi openers on foreign soil is a rarity; the last time a visiting pair achieved such a feat in New Zealand was in 1999 when South Africa’s Gary Kirsten and Herschelle Gibbs dominated the scene. 

The green tinge on the Wellington pitch, often a harbinger of doom for batsmen, did little to perturb Tamim and Shadman. Early on, Tim Southee and Trent Boult struggled to extract significant movement, allowing the openers to settle. By the time the Kiwi pacers found their rhythm, Tamim was already in his element. His back-foot artistry—marked by slashes square of the wicket—was a visual treat, showcasing his ability to turn adversity into opportunity. 

The Collapse: A Familiar Tale

The platform laid by the openers should have been the foundation for a competitive total. However, Bangladesh’s middle order, as if scripted by fate, faltered once again. Kane Williamson turned to his enforcer, Neil Wagner, who unleashed a barrage of short-pitched deliveries, targeting the batsmen’s resolve as much as their technique. Predictably, the middle order crumbled like a sandcastle against the tide. 

The Mind Games: Wagner vs. Mominul

Neil Wagner’s bowling is as much about psychology as it is about precision. Against Mominul Haque, the Kiwis executed their plan with surgical accuracy. 

In the 32nd over, Southee softened up Mominul with a probing line targeting his middle-and-leg stump, forcing him into a defensive mindset. A single brought Mominul face-to-face with Wagner, who approached the crease like a predator closing in on its prey. 

Mominul, expecting Wagner to continue Southee’s leg-stump line, adjusted his stance accordingly. Wagner, however, shifted gears. His first two deliveries were short and wide outside off, surprising Mominul and forcing him into tentative pushes. The third ball reverted to Southee’s leg-stump tactic, catching Mominul unprepared. Attempting to leave a short ball aimed at his ribcage, Mominul failed to drop his wrists, and the ball grazed his gloves on its way to BJ Watling. The dismissal mirrored his first-innings downfall in Hamilton—a testament to New Zealand’s meticulous planning and Mominul’s inability to adapt. 

Wagner’s Chess Match with Mithun

Mohammad Mithun initially displayed commendable composure against Wagner’s rib-line assault. He defended stoutly and ducked with confidence, weathering the storm for four deliveries. However, pressure is Wagner’s ally, and Mithun’s resolve began to waver. 

In the final delivery before lunch, Wagner switched his line to off-stump. Mithun, caught in two minds, hesitated. Failing to drop his wrists while attempting to leave the ball, he edged it to Watling. Wagner’s subtle change in line exposed Mithun’s indecision, a moment of brilliance in a battle of attrition. 

Soumya Sarkar: A Misjudged Counterattack

Soumya Sarkar’s back-and-across movement had been his ally in Hamilton, enabling him to counter short-pitched deliveries with aplomb. However, New Zealand adapted quickly. Against Matt Henry’s nagging line outside off-stump, Soumya’s aggressive instincts betrayed him. 

After dispatching a short ball for six, Soumya attempted an ill-advised swing at a half-long-hop with an angled bat. The resultant edge found its way to the slip cordon, ending his innings prematurely. His dismissal underscored the fine line between controlled aggression and reckless abandon. 

Mahmudullah: A Captain’s Struggle

Mahmudullah Riyad’s dismissals in Wellington were emblematic of Bangladesh’s collective woes. In Hamilton, his attempt to attack Wagner ended in disaster, and in Wellington, he fell into a similar trap. Despite showing greater discipline early in his innings, Mahmudullah’s back-and-across movement against Wagner appeared exaggerated, leaving him vulnerable to a harmless delivery. His lack of temperament, more than technique, proved to be his undoing. 

A Lesson in Mental Toughness

The Wellington Test, truncated though it was, offered a masterclass in the mental aspects of cricket. New Zealand’s bowlers, led by Wagner, demonstrated the value of adaptability, patience, and relentless pressure. Bangladesh’s middle order, in contrast, succumbed to self-doubt and poor shot selection. 

While Tamim and Shadman provided a glimmer of hope, their efforts were overshadowed by the middle order’s inability to withstand New Zealand’s mind games. If Bangladesh is to compete at the highest level, they must learn to pair technical refinement with mental resilience—a lesson as old as the game itself. 

For now, Wagner’s rib-line fury and the Kiwis’ tactical acumen remain the defining narratives of this rain-marred Test.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Bangladesh’s Battle in Hamilton: A Tale of Promise Undone by Impatience

 The lead-up to Bangladesh’s first Test at Hamilton was riddled with setbacks. Shakib Al Hasan’s absence due to a finger injury, Mushfiqur Rahim sidelined by wrist trouble, and the exclusion of Mustafizur Rahman left the team without its most experienced stars. The prospect of an inexperienced bowling attack further dimmed the outlook. Yet, there was a glimmer of hope. 

Sri Lanka’s recent defiance in South Africa, where they thrived despite missing key players, served as inspiration. Bangladesh, long removed from the label of cricket’s underdogs, hoped to replicate such resilience. Mahmudullah, standing in as captain, exuded optimism: 

"How we are performing in overseas conditions is always a challenge for us. Everyone doubts whether we can win an overseas Test or not. But I can assure you, as a captain and on players' behalf, we are not thinking on that line. We want to play according to our strengths."

His intent was clear: take on New Zealand’s challenge head-on, drawing strength from recent successes. It was a sentiment echoed by Tamim Iqbal, who brought this intent to life with a sublime century that stood as a beacon of grit and skill on a sunlit Hamilton morning. 

Tamim’s Masterclass: A Solitary Spark in the Gloom

Tamim Iqbal’s century was a study of audacity and adaptation. Facing the formidable duo of Trent Boult and Tim Southee, he displayed technical finesse and unyielding resolve. In a memorable thirteenth over, Tamim dismantled Boult’s rhythm with a series of authoritative strokes. By positioning himself closer to the line of delivery and employing a quicker bat-swing, he neutralized the swing and executed boundary after boundary, carving 17 runs off the over. 

Even Southee, known for his clever variations, could not unsettle Tamim. A crisp drive in front of square off Southee epitomized his dominance. Tamim’s innings wasn’t merely about runs—it was a demonstration of how to assert control in hostile conditions. 

Yet, his brilliance was a lone act. Despite his technical adjustments and back-foot mastery, Tamim found little support from his teammates. 

The Collapse: Impatience Amidst the Storm

New Zealand’s response to Tamim’s aggression was strategic. Enter Neil Wagner, armed with a barrage of short-pitched deliveries aimed at unsettling the batsmen. Wagner’s relentless assault demanded patience, a quality often more valuable than technical perfection in navigating such challenges. 

Bangladesh’s batsmen, however, succumbed not to extraordinary bowling but to their own lapses in judgment. 

Mominul Haque, one of Bangladesh’s most dependable batsmen with a Test average exceeding 44, inexplicably tickled a harmless leg-side delivery from Wagner to the keeper—a dismissal borne more of lethargy than intimidation. Mahmudullah, too, fell victim to a needlessly aggressive stroke against another unthreatening short ball. 

The afternoon session became a procession of poor shot selection and lacklustre temperament. With Tamim’s dismissal, the responsibility fell on the senior players to shepherd the innings. Instead, their recklessness precipitated a collapse that turned a promising day into one of frustration. 

Reflections on Responsibility

Tamim’s innings showcased the potential within the Bangladesh lineup, a reminder of the team’s ability to compete even in the most challenging conditions. However, cricket is seldom a solo act. The failures of seasoned campaigners like Mominul and Mahmudullah to anchor the innings underscored a persistent issue—an inability to translate intent into sustained application. 

In Test cricket, patience and resolve often triumph over raw skill. Bangladesh’s senior batsmen missed the opportunity to demonstrate these virtues, leaving the team to rue what might have been a day as bright as the Hamilton sunshine. 

As the series progresses, the lessons from this collapse must resonate. Talent, as Tamim exemplified, can ignite sparks. But only collective discipline and determination can keep the flame alive.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Why Do I Watch Cricket? The Courage, Commitment, and Stories That Transcend the Game

 I have often asked myself: why do I watch cricket? The answer has evolved over time. Initially, it was sheer passion—a raw and unrelenting love for the game. But as I delved deeper, I realized passion alone cannot sustain a lifelong connection with a sport. 

Cricket, like life, is a tapestry woven with threads of intelligence, skill, and courage. To truly fall in love with the game, one must appreciate how these elements converge to create moments that transcend the boundaries of the sport itself. Among these, courage often stands out as the defining trait that elevates cricket from a mere contest to a theatre of human resilience and spirit. 

Courage Under Fire: The Centenary Test of 1977

The Centenary Test of 1977 at the Melbourne Cricket Ground epitomized the courage cricket demands. It was a gladiatorial contest dominated by fiery fast bowlers like Dennis Lillee, Max Walker, Bob Willis, and Chris Old. The stakes were high, the egos massive, and the atmosphere electric. 

Amid this cauldron of pressure, Rick McCosker, Australia’s opener, suffered a brutal blow to the jaw from a Bob Willis bouncer. His jaw fractured, and McCosker was forced to retire hurt, leaving Australia with one less batsman for the second innings. Yet, in a moment that has since become folklore, McCosker returned to the crease, his face swathed in bandages, to add a crucial 54-run partnership with Rodney Marsh. 

The sight of McCosker, battered but unbroken, galvanized his team. His courage was contagious, inspiring his teammates to fight tooth and nail. Lillee, embodying the same indomitable spirit, ensured McCosker’s bravery did not go in vain. Australia won the Test by the same margin as the first-ever Test in 1877—a fitting tribute to the game’s enduring spirit. 

Courage in Modern Cricket: Tamim Iqbal’s One-Handed Heroics

Cricket’s history is replete with such tales of courage, but few resonate more with Bangladeshi fans than Tamim Iqbal’s unforgettable act of bravery during the 2018 Asia Cup. 

Bangladesh was in disarray against Sri Lanka, their innings teetering on the brink of collapse. Tamim, struck on the wrist by a vicious Suranga Lakmal bouncer, was forced to retire hurt. His injury was severe enough to rule him out of the tournament. Yet, as Bangladesh’s innings neared its end, with only one wicket in hand and three overs to play, Tamim walked out to bat—this time with one hand. 

The image of Tamim, his left hand bandaged and rendered useless, standing at the crease was a testament to the courage that cricket so often demands. His presence was not about scoring runs but about making a statement: that no matter how dire the circumstances, commitment and courage can inspire a team to rise above adversity. 

Tamim’s selfless act ignited something extraordinary in Mushfiqur Rahim. Until that point, Mushfiq had batted with composure, building partnerships and anchoring the innings. But with Tamim at the other end, Mushfiq switched gears, unleashing a ferocious onslaught that added 32 runs in the final three overs. His unbeaten 144 not only rescued Bangladesh from the brink but also left Sri Lanka psychologically shattered. 

The Anatomy of Courage in Cricket

What compels a cricketer to risk personal injury for the team’s cause? Courage in cricket is not merely about physical bravery; it is a complex interplay of mental fortitude, selflessness, and an unwavering commitment to the team. 

Rick McCosker’s return to the crease in 1977 and Tamim Iqbal’s one-handed stand in 2018 share a common thread: they were acts of defiance against fear and adversity. They were moments that transcended individual glory, becoming symbols of collective resilience and inspiration. 

In Tamim’s case, his act silenced critics who had previously questioned his commitment. For years, his laid-back demeanour had drawn scepticism, but that night, he redefined himself in the eyes of his countrymen. His courage was not just about facing Lakmal’s bouncers but about lifting the spirit of a beleaguered team. 

The Heart of the Game

Why do I watch cricket? Because it offers stories like these—stories of courage that inspire, of intelligence that fascinates, and of skill that leaves one in awe. Cricket is not just a game of runs and wickets; it is a celebration of the human spirit, a stage where the extraordinary emerges from the ordinary. 

As Bangladesh triumphed over Sri Lanka that night, it was not just a victory on the scoreboard but a triumph of courage and commitment. It was a reminder that in cricket, as in life, adversity is not the end but the beginning of something remarkable. 

Tamim Iqbal’s one-handed stand and Mushfiqur Rahim’s heroic innings encapsulated the essence of cricket: a game where courage and commitment can turn the tide, where the improbable becomes possible, and where the human spirit shines brightest under the most challenging circumstances.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Crisis of Commitment and a Flicker of Redemption: Bangladesh Cricket’s Mixed Fortunes

 

A few days ago, the President of the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) dropped a bombshell that sent shockwaves through the cricketing fraternity. In a candid interaction with the press, Nazmul Hassan alleged that senior players Shakib Al Hasan and Mustafizur Rahman were reluctant to play Test cricket. The revelation stunned reporters and reverberated across the nation, leaving fans and critics grappling with disbelief. 

In a democratic world, personal choice is sacrosanct. Yet, for professional athletes, individual preferences often collide with the greater responsibility of representing their nation. Shakib and Mustafiz, under their exceptional talent, have become icons of Bangladesh cricket. However, it is Test cricket—the sport’s most demanding and prestigious format—that has elevated Shakib to global stardom and holds the potential to do the same for Mustafiz. 

The timing of Nazmul Hassan’s statement could not have been worse. Coming on the heels of a humiliating Test series defeat against the West Indies, it further fueled doubts about the commitment and temperament of Bangladesh’s senior players. The Tigers’ spineless performances raised uncomfortable questions about their dedication to the format. While defeats are part of the game, losing without a semblance of fight is a bitter pill for fans to swallow. 

A Ray of Hope in Guyana

Just as the shadow of doubt began to engulf Bangladesh cricket, the team produced a morale-boosting victory in Guyana. The triumph, though not flawless, temporarily lifted the gloom and provided a glimmer of hope for the Tigers’ faithful. 

At the toss, West Indies captain Jason Holder expressed little concern over losing, confident that the dampness in the pitch would dissipate as the match progressed. Bangladesh’s innings began with Tamim Iqbal and Shakib Al Hasan adopting a cautious approach, their grafting partnership laying a foundation that begged for acceleration in the latter stages. 

However, it was Mushfiqur Rahim who rose to the occasion, crafting a masterful innings that demonstrated the ideal approach to batting on the surface. His knock was a blueprint of controlled aggression, transforming a middling total into a competitive one. Bangladesh finished just shy of 250—a score that, while not imposing, was defendable with disciplined bowling and fielding. 

The Bowlers Step Up

Defending the target, Bangladesh’s bowlers faced the daunting task of containing a West Indies batting lineup known for its explosive power. Mashrafe Bin Mortaza led from the front, exploiting the home side’s lack of intent with a display of guile and precision. 

While Mashrafe excelled, the rest of the attack delivered mixed performances. Mehidy Hasan Miraz and Mosaddek Hossain provided valuable support, but Shakib and Rubel Hossain struggled with their lengths, and Mustafizur Rahman appeared erratic in his early spells before regaining control towards the end. 

The West Indies’ batting effort was uncharacteristically subdued, resembling a rudderless ship adrift at sea. Their top and middle order faltered, failing to replicate the heroics of earlier matches on the same pitch. This lacklustre display ultimately handed Bangladesh a much-needed victory. 

A Fragile Redemption

While the win in Guyana offers a respite, it does not erase the underlying issues plaguing Bangladesh cricket. The doubts about the team’s consistency and commitment remain. Success, as the adage goes, has many fathers, but failure is an orphan. The Tigers’ ability to sustain the momentum from this victory will determine whether this was a turning point or merely a fleeting moment of relief. 

Bangladesh cricket stands at a crossroads. The reluctance of senior players to commit to Test cricket is a symptom of deeper structural and cultural challenges. The BCB must address these issues with urgency, fostering an environment that values Test cricket as the ultimate stage for greatness. 

For the players, especially Shakib and Mustafiz, the challenge is twofold: to honour their immense talent and to recognize the responsibility that comes with representing a Test-playing nation. The Guyana victory is a reminder that redemption is possible, but it requires sustained effort, unity, and a collective will to rise above mediocrity. 

The Tigers’ journey continues, fraught with challenges but not devoid of hope. The road ahead demands introspection, resilience, and a renewed commitment to the game’s highest ideals. Only then can Bangladesh cricket truly roar.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Mirpur Turns Hostile: A Test of Patience and Composure

 

After the International Cricket Council (ICC) deemed the Chittagong pitch “below average” for yielding 1533 runs at the cost of just 24 wickets, Mirpur was expected to restore balance to the battle between bat and ball. The curator, perhaps mindful of the criticism, prepared a surface that offered turn from the first hour of play—a rare but welcome sight in modern Test cricket. By stumps, it was evident that this wicket had delivered a riveting day of cricket, where the ball held the upper hand without completely extinguishing the batsmen's hopes. 

For stand-in captain Mahmudullah Riyad, losing the toss might have been a blessing in disguise. His bowlers, led by the returning Abdur Razzak, exploited the conditions skillfully to bundle out Sri Lanka for 222—a score that was competitive on this treacherous surface but far from insurmountable. 

A Test of Technique: Sri Lanka’s Survival Act

Sri Lanka’s innings was a tale of two halves. At 116 for 6, they were teetering on the edge of disaster. Yet, Roshen Silva and Dilruwan Perera demonstrated the virtues of patience and technique, stitching together a partnership that steadied the ship. Unlike the earlier batsmen, who fell prey to loose strokes or misjudged turns, Silva and Perera chose caution over aggression. 

CricViz revealed their methodical approach: *“Since the fall of the sixth wicket, the pair of Roshen Silva and Dilruwan Perera have batted off the front foot to 66.6% of the deliveries they faced, compared to 56.9% earlier. The defensive shot percentage rose to 32.6% from 20.7%.”* 

Their partnership underscored a key lesson on this surface—survival required adaptability. As the pitch began to offer extravagant turn, it demanded composure and the ability to resist the temptation of flashy strokes. 

Earlier, Kusal Mendis had exploited the initial conditions, cashing in on the shorter deliveries from Mehidy Hasan Miraz and Razzak. CricViz noted his contrasting approach: *“Mendis camped more on the back foot (42%) compared to Silva (22%) and played defensive shots off just 18% of the deliveries to Silva’s 27%.”* While Mendis reaped early rewards, Silva’s and Perera’s innings demonstrated the discipline needed as the track began to bite. 

Bangladesh's Collapse: A Lesson in Panic and Poor Technique

Bangladesh’s response with the bat was nothing short of a calamity. The batsmen, fresh off a run-fest in Chittagong, seemed ill-prepared for the challenges of a wicket demanding restraint. Tamim Iqbal set the tone—unfortunately, for all the wrong reasons. His authoritative drive off the second ball of the innings was a statement of intent, but his dismissal on the very next delivery exposed his inability to adjust. Suranga Lakmal’s good-length ball demanded respect, but Tamim’s half-hearted forward push resulted in a simple return catch. It was not a wicket-taking delivery, but it claimed a wicket nonetheless. 

The chaos continued. Mominul Haque, scorer of twin centuries in the previous Test, committed an inexplicable error, running himself out with his bat in the air—a mistake more befitting a novice than a seasoned top-order batsman. ESPNcricinfo’s commentary aptly described it as “atrociously shoddy.”

Mushfiqur Rahim, Bangladesh’s most reliable batsman, appeared a shadow of himself. Struggling to judge the length and movement of Lakmal’s deliveries, he shouldered arms to a ball that jagged back to rattle his stumps. Once again, it was not a delivery of extraordinary quality; it was a moment of indecision that cost Bangladesh dearly. 

Imrul Kayes compounded the misery by misjudging a delivery from Dilruwan Perera, playing for turn that wasn’t there. His decision to waste a review on an obvious lbw only added to the frustration. 

A Crisis of Composure

Bangladesh’s collapse was less about Sri Lanka’s brilliance and more about their own inability to handle pressure. In the days of Chandika Hathurusingha, the Tigers had developed a reputation for resilience. They had learned to claw their way out of difficult situations and embrace the pressure of big moments. That character, however, seems to have faded. 

The recent failures in the Tri-series final and the struggles on a flat Chittagong pitch hinted at deeper issues, but Mirpur laid them bare. The loss of one or two quick wickets was enough to send the entire batting lineup into disarray. Sri Lanka’s bowlers bowled smartly, but they did not produce unplayable deliveries. Bangladesh’s batsmen simply lacked the mental fortitude to weather the storm. 

The Way Forward

This match serves as a stark reminder of the importance of adaptability in Test cricket. Tracks like Mirpur demand more than just technical skill; they test a batsman’s temperament and ability to think on their feet. While Sri Lanka’s Silva and Perera showed how to survive and thrive on such a wicket, Bangladesh’s batsmen succumbed to panic and poor decision-making. 

If Bangladesh are to regain their fighting spirit, they must address these psychological frailties. It is not enough to thrive on flat pitches; they must learn to embrace the challenge of difficult conditions. For now, the Mirpur track stands as a cruel teacher, exposing the flaws of a team that has forgotten how to fight. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Mirpur’s Third Day: Australia’s Resilience Shines Amidst Adversity

  

The third day at Mirpur unfolded under the blazing sun, its oppressive heat testing players and amplifying the stakes of a fiercely contested Test. Australia, bruised from Bangladesh’s upper hand, entered the day with a mountain to climb. Yet, true to their reputation, they crafted a stirring comeback, blending strategy with execution to claw back into the game. 

A Morning of Attrition: Bangladesh Tightens the Noose

The day began with promise for Bangladesh. Tamim Iqbal, in sublime form, dictated terms, extending their lead with fluid stroke play. The absence of Josh Hazlewood, who exited clutching his left side after just one over, further bolstered the hosts’ dominance. Cricket Australia later confirmed Hazlewood’s injury as a "sore side," ruling him out of the remainder of the innings—a significant blow to Steve Smith’s already limited arsenal. 

By lunch, Bangladesh were in command, their lead swelling and a target of 300-plus looking imminent. Australia, already fragile from their first-innings debacle, faced a daunting task. Yet, the Australians are a team that thrives in adversity, finding strength in their resourcefulness. 

Post-Lunch Turnaround: Cummins and Lyon Breathe Fire

Steve Smith returned from lunch with a renewed strategy. Knowing that Tamim Iqbal and Shakib Al Hasan were the linchpins of Bangladesh’s batting, Smith targeted them with precision and aggression. Pat Cummins and Nathan Lyon, Australia’s two most potent weapons in the absence of Hazlewood, were tasked with turning the tide. 

Cummins vs. Tamim: A Battle of Wits and Fire

Smith’s approach was methodical. He began with Usman Khawaja’s innocuous deliveries, creating a false sense of security for Tamim. The ploy worked. By the time Cummins returned, Tamim was caught off-guard by a barrage of rib-snorters, delivered with venom and impeccable accuracy. 

The breakthrough came in Cummins’ third over post-lunch. A ferocious short ball reared off the surface, forcing Tamim into a tentative jab. Australia appealed for a faint edge, and while the on-field umpire denied it, the decision was overturned upon review. The ultra-edge confirmed a faint nick, and Tamim’s crucial wicket was secured. 

The dismissal was a masterpiece of planning and execution, a testament to Australia’s ability to strategize under pressure. 

Lyon’s Masterclass: Outthinking Shakib Al Hasan

Shakib Al Hasan strode to the crease with the intent to counterattack, much as he had in the first innings. His initial response was aggressive, flashing at a full delivery from Cummins. Recognizing the pattern, Smith and Lyon devised a trap, exploiting Shakib’s tendency to trust the turn. 

Nathan Lyon, who had struggled for consistency in the first innings, adjusted brilliantly. He varied his length, enticing Shakib to play on instinct. The fifth ball of the 55th over was the coup de grâce—a delivery targeting the middle stump that held its line instead of turning. Shakib, expecting spin, misjudged and lofted a mistimed shot to extra cover, where Cummins gleefully completed the catch. 

Shakib’s dismissal was more than a wicket; it was a psychological blow to Bangladesh. 

Pressure Mounts: Bangladesh’s Fragility Exposed

With Tamim and Shakib gone, Bangladesh’s innings faltered. Cummins and Lyon bowled in tandem, exploiting the conditions and maintaining relentless pressure. While Bangladesh managed to keep the scoreboard ticking, the regular fall of wickets prevented them from building partnerships. 

By the time Bangladesh’s innings ended, they had set Australia a target of 264—a respectable lead but far from the insurmountable mountain they had hoped for at lunch. 

Australia’s Tactical Brilliance: A Day of Redemption

Day 3 highlighted Australia’s hallmark qualities: adaptability, aggression, and mental toughness. Despite the loss of Hazlewood and the oppressive conditions, Smith’s tactical acumen and the bowlers’ precision gave them a foothold in the game. 

Cummins’ spell was fiery and disciplined, a reminder of his prowess as a spearhead. Lyon’s ability to outthink the batsmen showcased his value on spinning tracks, where subtle variations often outweigh raw turn. Together, they turned the tide, bringing Australia back into contention. 

The Road Ahead: Momentum Shifts to Australia

For the first time in this Test, the momentum seemed to favour Australia. Chasing 264 on a track that was starting to offer variable bounce and spin would be no easy task, but Australia’s belief had been rekindled. With two days remaining, the match was poised delicately, a thrilling contest that encapsulated the unpredictable charm of Test cricket. 

Conclusion

Mirpur’s third day will be remembered for Australia’s tenacity in adversity. While Bangladesh still held an advantage, Australia’s fightback set the stage for a captivating finish. Would the visitors’ grit prevail, or would Bangladesh’s spinners weave a web too intricate to escape? The answer lay in the drama yet to unfold. 

Thank You
Faisal Caesar

Whims of Nature, Drama of Cricket: The Mirpur Test Unfolds

 

Bangladesh, a land of poetry and passion, found itself at the mercy of whimsical weather last week. The brightness of the sun was often overshadowed by dark clouds, and torrents of rain alternated between blessings for the parched lands and curses for those battling floods. The unpredictable rhythms of Mother Nature cast a shadow over the much-anticipated first Test at Mirpur between Bangladesh and Australia. Yet, as if heeding the prayers of cricket enthusiasts, the heavens offered respite, allowing the action to take centre stage under a bright sun.

Cummins: The Harbinger of Chaos

Test cricket thrives on theatre, and Pat Cummins wasted no time scripting the opening act. With Josh Hazlewood maintaining an impeccable line and length, Cummins brought contrasting aggression to the attack. The plan was simple: unsettle the Bangladeshi top order with pace and precision. It worked like clockwork.

Soumya Sarkar and Imrul Kayes fell to lapses in judgment. Soumya poked at a delivery he should have left alone, while Kayes misjudged a short one, playing an ill-advised shot off his body. Sabbir Rahman, caught off guard by Cummins' fuller delivery at a searing pace, edged to the keeper, leaving Bangladesh reeling at 10 for 3. 

Cummins’ spell was a masterclass in controlled aggression, setting the tone for a series that demanded every ounce of resilience from the Tigers. 

Tamim and Shakib: A Counterpunch in Harmony

As the scoreboard read 10 for 3, two stalwarts of Bangladesh cricket, Tamim Iqbal and Shakib Al Hasan, walked out with a mission to rescue their side. What followed was not just a recovery but an exhibition of counterattacking cricket at its finest.

Tamim, initially squared up by Hazlewood, signalled his intent with a commanding pull shot off a short delivery. Shakib, always a step ahead, slashed Cummins’ wide offering with authority. Their approach echoed the philosophy of Brazil’s Tele Santana—attack as the best form of defence. When Steve Smith brought in Nathan Lyon in just the seventh over, Tamim greeted him with a majestic six over extra cover, underlining Bangladesh’s refusal to retreat. 

Shakib’s innings was a masterclass in technical adaptation. He relied on a solid backlift, precise footwork, and the ability to disturb the bowlers’ lengths by advancing down the track. His disciplined approach, punctuated by judicious leaves and authoritative strokes, complemented Tamim’s controlled aggression. The duo stitched together a 155-run partnership, lifting Bangladesh from the depths of despair and turning the day into a spectacle of counterpunching brilliance.

Smith’s Tactical Response

Steve Smith, ever the cerebral tactician, recognized the danger posed by the flourishing partnership. Tamim and Shakib thrived on backfoot play, comfortably countering the bowlers' lengths. The solution was to induce errors by altering the rhythm.

Smith’s gamble with Glenn Maxwell paid off. Hazlewood maintained relentless pressure, while Maxwell bowled a probing line, inviting the batsmen to overreach. Tamim, previously restrained in his strokeplay, succumbed to temptation. Maxwell delivered a stiffly bouncing ball, and Tamim’s attempted horizontal strike resulted in his downfall. 

Australia’s ability to exploit a momentary lapse brought the partnership to an end. The Tigers, who had clawed their way back into the contest, lost their last five wickets for just 72 runs. It was a timely reminder that in Test cricket, dominance is fleeting, and one mistake can shift the momentum.

The Twilight Roar: Shakib and Miraz Strike Back

As the Australians walked out to bat, they were greeted not just by fading light but by the ominous figures of Shakib Al Hasan and Mehidy Hasan Miraz. The duo spun a web of deceit, turning the ball prodigiously and extracting alarming bounce to unnerve the visitors. 

David Warner, the architect of countless Australian victories, was undone by Miraz’s faster delivery, while Shakib deceived Nathan Lyon with a subtle variation that drifted in and turned sharply. Usman Khawaja, caught in a haze of indecision, looked like a man out of his depth. 

By the close of play, Australia was tottering at 18 for 3, a fitting conclusion to a day that showcased the unpredictable beauty of Test cricket.

The Essence of Test Cricket in Mirpur

The Mirpur Test was not just a game; it was a tapestry of human error, brilliance, and resilience woven together under the watchful gaze of a bright sun. Pat Cummins’ fiery spell, Tamim and Shakib’s counterpunch, and the twilight magic of Bangladesh’s spinners encapsulated the essence of the longest format—a format where every session tells a story and every mistake invites consequences.

As Bangladesh and Australia continue their battle, one thing is certain: Test cricket is alive and thriving, and the Tigers are ready to roar.

Thank You
Faisal Caesar 

Tamim Iqbal: The Evolution of Bangladesh’s Cricketing Luminary

Amid the sombre clouds hanging over England during the summer of 2017, a nation sought solace in the unifying power of cricket. Yet, even as the cricketing world rallied to defy the shadows of recent terrorist attacks, the on-field narratives offered moments of introspection. For Bangladesh, their contest against Australia at the Kennington Oval became a tale of resilience, not just for the team but for a batsman who stood tall against adversity: Tamim Iqbal. 

Tamim’s 95-run innings, carved under challenging conditions, was not merely a standout performance in an otherwise tepid team display. It symbolized the transformation of a cricketer who had, through grit and technical refinement, become the bedrock of Bangladesh’s batting lineup. His knock underlined the hallmarks of a player who thrives in adversity—displaying technique, temperament, and adaptability that have come to define his recent purple patch. 

The Context: A Day Shrouded in Gloom 

The match was set against a poignant backdrop, with London still reeling from the June 3 Southwark attack. The overcast sky mirrored the collective grief, yet cricket persisted as a testament to humanity's resilience. Bangladesh captain Mashrafe Mortaza’s decision to bat first was both a calculated gamble and a nod to courage—choosing to face the Australian pace barrage under daylight rather than the trickier conditions of floodlit play. 

Unfortunately, Bangladesh’s batting lineup, barring Tamim, faltered under the relentless scrutiny of Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood, and Pat Cummins. The innings ended prematurely, with Tamim’s valiant 95 standing out as the sole resistance. However, nature intervened with torrential rain, and Bangladesh escaped with an undeserved point. 

Tamim’s Technical Renaissance 

Tamim’s brilliance at the Oval wasn’t born of chance. It was the result of deliberate adjustments in technique and mindset over the past few years. Once plagued by inconsistency and technical flaws, Tamim has transformed himself into a batsman capable of excelling in any condition—a testament to hard work and introspection. 

1. Back Lift: Precision Reimagined

A batsman’s backlift is the cornerstone of their stroke-making ability. Tamim, during his lean patch three years ago, struggled with a flawed backlift. Picking the bat up towards the third slip rather than between the first and second slip, he failed to align his strokes with the ball's trajectory, leading to frequent dismissals. 

The present-day Tamim has redefined this aspect of his game. His backlift now adheres to the textbook, with subtle variations depending on the type of bowling. Against pace, he employs a higher back lift, ensuring power and precision, while against spin, it is slightly lower, facilitating control. This adjustment, coupled with an ideal stance—knees bent, weight on toes, elbow away from the body, and eyes fixed on the bowler—has enabled him to play confidently through the line of the ball. 

2. Improved Defence: The Bedrock of Consistency

A hallmark of Tamim’s evolution is his vastly improved defensive technique. In the past, his defence often lacked solidity, with the ball frequently finding the inside edge or lodging awkwardly between bat and pad. Today, Tamim exhibits a compact defensive game, whether on the front or back foot. This solidity has provided him with the platform to build long innings and weather challenging spells. 

3. Soft Hands: A Lesson for the Lineup

One of the common pitfalls for Bangladeshi batsmen is their tendency to go hard at the ball, a risky approach against quality attacks. Tamim, however, has embraced the art of playing with soft hands. By allowing the ball to come closer to his body and using minimal force, he has negated the movement and bounce generated by bowlers like Starc and Hazlewood. This adjustment has not only reduced risks but has also allowed him to manoeuvre the ball with finesse. 

4. Mastery on the Back Foot

The ability to play confidently off the back foot is a rarity among Bangladeshi batsmen, who often overcommit to the front foot due to their upbringing on flat subcontinental pitches. Tamim, however, has shown remarkable aptitude on the back foot, getting behind the line of the ball with precision. Against Australia’s hostile pace attack, this skill was instrumental in his ability to counter the short ball and play with authority. 

Beyond Technique: The Mental Fortitude 

While technical adjustments have fueled Tamim’s resurgence, it is his mental fortitude that has truly set him apart. He is no longer a batsman who crumbles under pressure or throws away his wicket in moments of impatience. Instead, he leads by example, demonstrating a calm yet determined approach, even in the face of adversity. His ability to read the game, adapt to conditions, and make strategic decisions mid-innings is a reflection of his maturity. 

A Beacon for Bangladesh Cricket 

Tamim Iqbal’s resurgence is a beacon of hope for Bangladesh cricket, a testament to what can be achieved through dedication and adaptability. His transformation from a mercurial talent to a dependable stalwart offers valuable lessons for his teammates. In a lineup often marred by inconsistency, Tamim’s approach serves as a blueprint for aspiring batsmen. 

As he continues to shine on the international stage, Tamim’s journey underscores an enduring truth: greatness is not a product of fleeting brilliance but of sustained effort, meticulous preparation, and the willingness to evolve. For Bangladesh, he remains not just a batsman in form but a symbol of what their cricket can aspire to become.  

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The Tigers’ Tale at Kennington: A Symphony of Hope and Missed Opportunities

The stage was set at Kennington Oval for a high-octane encounter as England, the pre-tournament favourites, locked horns with a spirited Bangladesh side. The pitch—a batting paradise, glistening under the London sun—promised a run feast. Yet, the day unfolded as a narrative of brilliance tinged with frustration, where Bangladesh glimpsed glory but faltered in seizing it. 

Woakes’ Early Exit and England’s Dilemma

Chris Woakes’ departure with a side strain after just two overs cast a shadow over England’s plans. The experienced all-rounder’s absence was evident, and skipper Eoin Morgan’s furrowed brows betrayed his concern. A fresh pitch often demands tactical acumen, but Morgan’s scheme to leverage early breakthroughs unravelled against the resilient Bangladeshi openers. 

Tamim Iqbal and Soumya Sarkar stood tall against England’s initial bursts, crafting a gallant 56-run partnership in the first 12 overs. Despite England snaring two wickets before the century mark, the third-wicket stand between Tamim and Mushfiqur Rahim became the cornerstone of Bangladesh’s innings. Their 166-run alliance exuded dominance, frustrating England's bowlers and injecting hope into the Bangladeshi camp. 

Tamim and Mushfiqur: A Symphony of Mastery

Tamim was a maestro in his element, conducting his innings with unmatched finesse. Whether rotating the strike or counterattacking with audacity, he seemed untouchable. Mushfiqur, the perfect foil, played an understated yet equally effective role. Together, they dismantled England’s bowling, turning the contest into an exhibition of precision and power. 

However, cricket’s cruel irony surfaced as the partnership ended. From 250 runs in the 43rd over, Bangladesh managed only 55 more in the last six—a damp squib on a deck primed for fireworks. The inability to capitalize on a solid foundation highlighted a recurring Achilles' heel for the Tigers. 

Batting Woes in the Final Overs

Bangladesh’s tendency to lose momentum in the slogovers has been their undoing in recent years. The trend, evident in the tri-nation series in Ireland and now on the grand stage, underscores a strategic void. England’s bowlers, led by Liam Plunkett and Mark Wood, deployed variations masterfully, denying Bangladesh’s hitters the room to free their arms. 

Effective death-overs batting demands innovation and intent. The likes of MS Dhoni and Glenn Maxwell exemplify this art—standing outside the crease, creating a room, and unleashing a baseball-esque assault. Yet, despite boasting hitters like Sabbir Rahman and Mosaddek Hossain, Bangladesh’s approach lacked clarity. The coaching staff, led by Chandika Hathurusingha, must focus on refining this critical phase to ensure a robust finish in future games. 

The Case for a Balanced Attack

Defending 305 on a featherbed pitch against England’s fearless stroke-makers was always going to be a Herculean task. Yet, questions linger over team selection. Ignoring Mehedi Hasan, a proven performer against England, seemed a misstep. His inclusion could have added variety to the attack and lent crucial control during the middle overs. 

Additionally, relying on part-time bowlers as the fifth option appeared defensive. An attacking combination—anchored by specialist bowlers—has historically underpinned Bangladesh’s success in ODIs. With Mehedi in the XI and Sabbir Rahman promoted to number three, the Tigers might have crafted a more formidable unit, maintaining their fearless brand of cricket. 

Lessons from the Kennington Canvas

England’s victory, achieved with clinical ease, affirmed their status as tournament favourites. Yet, Bangladesh’s spirited fight was a reminder of their potential to upset the giants. The Kennington clash underscored the need for adaptability on flat tracks. 

Bangladesh’s bowlers must master the art of restricting runs, even on batting-friendly surfaces. A dual approach—drying up runs from one end while attacking from the other—could disrupt partnerships and build pressure. The length in death overs must remain full, with subtle pace variations to keep batters guessing. Integrating spin into the middle overs could also provide the balance needed to turn the tide. 

Looking Ahead 

While the Tigers’ defeat may sting, it also offers invaluable lessons. The potential within the team is undeniable, but realizing it demands a fine balance of strategy, execution, and bold decision-making. With introspection and preparation, Bangladesh can emerge stronger, turning their moments of brilliance into sustained dominance. 

As the tournament unfolds, one can only hope the Tigers roar louder, not just in glimpses, but across every phase of the game—a symphony perfected, resonating with their untapped potential.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

March: The Month of Triumph and Resilience for Bangladesh

March in Bangladesh’s history is no mere page in the calendar—it is a living testament to resilience, courage, and the unyielding will to stand free. In 1971, the month’s final week ignited the nation’s defining struggle: the Liberation War. On March 25, the West Pakistani military unleashed a night of brutality in Dhaka, but the flames they sought to extinguish only blazed higher. Within two days, Major Ziaur Rahman’s declaration of independence—broadcast from Kalurghat Radio Station on behalf of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman—rang across the land, a call that transformed fear into defiance.

Decades later, March would again test Bangladesh’s spirit—not on a battlefield, but on a cricket field. In 2017, amid the shadow of terrorist attacks and national anxiety, the Bangladesh cricket team stepped into Colombo for their landmark 100th Test. Against Sri Lanka, a nation long dominant on its home turf, Bangladesh sought not only victory but affirmation—a moment that could stand alongside the great turning points of their sporting history.

Day One: A Statement of Intent

The P Sara Oval greeted Bangladesh with ceremonial warmth, but the challenge ahead was severe. Losing the toss could have tilted the balance, yet Mustafizur Rahman’s early incision and Mehedi Hasan’s guile dismantled Sri Lanka’s top order. By lunch, the hosts were tottering at 70 for 4. Chandimal’s defiance—86 not out at stumps—kept them afloat, but Bangladesh had made their presence felt.

There was more than skill at play; there was belief. Tamim Iqbal’s constant chatter in the field, Shakib Al Hasan’s tight spells, Mushfiqur Rahim’s sharp glove work—all spoke of a side determined to seize the moment. This was no ordinary start; it was a declaration that Bangladesh would not be passengers in their centennial Test.

The Middle Passage: Endurance and Errors

Cricket’s narrative often swings on discipline. On the second day, Bangladesh’s bowlers found themselves on the wrong end of Chandimal’s patience. His century, built alongside Herath and Lakmal, lifted Sri Lanka to 338. In reply, Bangladesh began brightly—Tamim and Soumya Sarkar stroking a fluent stand—but wickets at crucial intervals stunted momentum. By stumps, the scoreboard reflected both promise and peril.

It was on the third day that Bangladesh turned the match’s tide. Starting on 214 for 5, they needed a seasoned hand to anchor the innings. Shakib answered with a measured, risk-averse century—his fifth in Tests—while debutant Mosaddek Hossain added a composed 75. Their seventh-wicket stand of 131 propelled Bangladesh to 467, a lead of 129. For only the second time in their history, they had taken a first-innings lead away from home while batting second.

Day Four: The Spell That Tilted the Game

If Shakib’s innings was the backbone, Mustafizur’s post-lunch spell on day four was the dagger. In oppressive Colombo heat, he bent the ball like a conjurer, dismissing Mendis, Chandimal, and de Silva in a seven-over burst that reshaped the contest. Shakib’s three wickets and Taijul Islam’s late strike ensured Sri Lanka closed with only a 139-run lead. The tension was now palpable—the fourth innings would be the crucible.

Day Five: Crossing the Threshold

Chasing 191 in an away Test is treacherous terrain for Bangladesh, but Tamim and Sabbir Rahman’s 109-run stand for the third wicket was a masterclass in poise. Tamim’s 82 was a blend of caution and calculated aggression, featuring drives through extra cover and a towering six over long-on. Yet, as is often the case in Bangladesh’s history, the finish was not without drama.

Shakib’s dismissal with 29 still required stirred nerves. Mushfiqur narrowly escaped an lbw on review. Mosaddek’s crisp boundaries brought the target within touching distance before he fell. Finally, Mehedi Hasan’s sweep sealed the win—their first ever Test victory over Sri Lanka and a fitting jewel for their 100th match.

The Turning Point Beyond the Field

This victory did not emerge from thin air. It was forged in an hour-long dressing-room meeting after their heavy Galle defeat—a session of candid self-assessment led by coach Chandika Hathurusingha and senior players. They spoke of valuing every run, every saved boundary, every moment of pressure applied. It was not unlike the fabled 2003 Indian World Cup team meeting that sparked a turnaround.

In Colombo, the lessons bore fruit. The bowlers attacked with intelligence; the fielders stayed alert; the batsmen absorbed pressure and built partnerships. Hathurusingha later called Mustafizur’s fourth-day spell “the game changer,” but the real change was deeper—an alignment of focus, effort, and belief.

Conclusion: March, Again

Bangladesh’s win at the P Sara Oval was more than a statistical milestone. It was the proof of a team’s capacity to learn, adapt, and prevail against a formidable home side. For a nation that marks March as the month of liberation, the victory was symbolic—another chapter of resilience, another reaffirmation that perseverance yields triumph.

The 100th Test was not just a cricket match. It was an echo of 1971’s spirit: that under pressure, with the odds against them, Bangladesh can still rise. And if they hold onto the lessons from Colombo—cherishing every run, guarding every chance—they might just find that the place they have always sought to succeed, Test cricket, is now within their grasp.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar