Bangladesh: When Turning Off the Screen Becomes an Act of Resistance

If Bangladesh’s decision to suspend the broadcast of the Indian Premier League (IPL), followed by its reluctance to travel to India for the upcoming T20 World Cup, is dismissed as an emotional reaction or a cricketing tantrum, then we have failed to read the deeper grammar of South Asian power politics. This was not an impulsive gesture born of wounded pride. It was a calculated, understated, and dignified act of resistance, polite in form, political in substance.

No slogans were shouted. No diplomatic ultimatums were issued. Instead, symbolism was deployed. And in politics, particularly in unequal relationships, symbolism often carries more weight than confrontation.

The government justified the move in simple terms: Bangladesh’s premier fast bowler, Mustafizur Rahman, was dropped from the Kolkata Knight Riders squad without any explanation. On the surface, this might appear to be routine franchise management. But the absence of explanation is precisely where the politics begin. Silence, in such contexts, is not neutrality. It is a hierarchy made visible.

In modern cricket, to exclude without explanation is not merely to sideline a player; it is to disregard a country’s cricketing dignity. It is to say that some questions do not deserve answers, because not everyone is entitled to ask them.

The Board of Control for Cricket in India has long ceased to treat cricket as a sport alone. It is now a multi-billion-dollar corporate ecosystem, where bats and balls are ornamental, and real decisions are made in boardrooms shaped by capital, political proximity, and strategic leverage. Cricketing logic is optional. Performance is negotiable. Power is not.

The IPL is marketed as the world’s greatest meritocracy, a carnival where talent triumphs above all else. In reality, it resembles a gated community: open to many, owned by a few. You may play, entertain, and generate revenue, but you may not ask questions. If you do, you are reminded—quietly but firmly, of “how things work.”

For Bangladeshi cricketers, this reality is particularly unforgiving. Their presence in the IPL is never framed as a right; it is extended as a favour. A privilege that can be granted today and withdrawn tomorrow, without explanation. To seek clarity is to risk discomfort.

Contrast this with how Australian or English players are treated. Scheduling conflicts are negotiated. Security concerns are delicately managed. Calendars bend. Justifications soften. Global cricket suddenly becomes flexible.

Is this what “global cricket leadership” now looks like?

In this lexicon, leadership means imposition. Cooperation means compliance. And the much-celebrated “cricketing family” exists only as long as everyone understands their place.

Mustafizur Rahman is not an anonymous journeyman. His cutters, variations, and composure under pressure have earned him global recognition. He is not new to the IPL. His credentials are well established. Yet neither the franchise nor the governing power felt compelled to explain his exclusion. Because power does not explain itself. It announces decisions and expects acceptance.

This is where the mask slips. Unity is celebrated when dominant interests are secure. But when smaller nations ask for parity or respect, they become inconvenient relatives, best ignored.

At this point, cricket bleeds seamlessly into politics. The IPL does not exist in isolation from the broader contours of India–Bangladesh relations, which have long been defined by asymmetry, whether in trade, water sharing, border killings, visa regimes, or diplomatic leverage. Cricket simply offers a softer, more palatable theatre in which dominance can be exercised under the banner of sport.

Bangladesh’s decision to suspend the IPL broadcast is not economic retaliation. It is a moral and political statement. No one seriously believes this will dent the league’s revenue or dull its spectacle. The IPL is too vast, too entrenched, too profitable for that.

But symbolism is not measured in balance sheets.

Suspending the broadcast sends a clear message: Bangladesh is not merely a consumer market. It is a cricket-loving nation that demands respect. Passion can be monetised. Humiliation, however, is remembered.

In India’s political ecosystem, cricket has long functioned as soft power. Fixtures, exclusions, and selective “security concerns” often double as diplomatic instruments. Who plays, who doesn’t, who is deemed indispensable, and who is dispensable—these decisions are rarely apolitical.

Bangladesh’s quiet rebuff forces an uncomfortable question: is cricket still a global game? Or has it become a stage where the largest shareholder decides who plays, who watches, and who is expected to absorb indignity in silence?

The IPL will go on. Cameras will roll. Stadiums will fill. The festival will resume. But outside the glare, some will stand apart, aware that this celebration is not equal for all.

If cricket continues down this path, where power consistently eclipses merit, its future is already visible. The game will cease to be global. It will become a franchised entertainment system, where players are assets, questions are unwelcome, and rules are rewritten without explanation.

In that version of cricket, the “Man of the Match” will no longer be decided by bat or ball. It will belong to institutions that write the rules, bend them when convenient, and never feel obliged to justify themselves.

Bangladesh’s restraint offers a reminder: submission is not the only response to power. Sometimes silence itself is resistance. And sometimes, turning off the screen says more than any protest ever could.

Thank You

Faisal Caeasar

Mustafizur Rahman: The Quiet Maestro of Bangladesh Cricket

In the annals of sporting history, some rare individuals transcend the game, becoming symbols of hope and joy for their nations. Brazil had Pelé and Garrincha, Argentina had Maradona, and the world marvelled at Muhammad Ali’s poetry in motion. For Bangladesh, a cricketing nation still carving its identity, such gifts have been few and far between. Shakib Al Hasan has long been hailed as the torchbearer, but in Mustafizur Rahman—affectionately known as Fizz—Bangladesh has found a cricketer whose artistry on the pitch rivals the finest poetry. 

The Genesis of a Phenomenon 

Mustafizur’s journey from the quiet district of Satkhira to international stardom is a story of quiet determination and extraordinary talent. In 2012, a shy, wiry teenager arrived in Dhaka to attend a fast-bowling camp at the Shere Bangla National Stadium. His left-arm seam and uncanny ability to deliver off-cutters caught the attention of local coaches, earning him a spot in Bangladesh’s age-group teams. By 2014, he was representing Khulna Division in the Bangladesh Cricket League, and his nine-wicket haul at the Under-19 World Cup in the Middle East hinted at the promise within. 

However, it was under the watchful eye of Chandika Hathurusingha and Heath Streak that Fizz truly blossomed. Recognizing his potential, Hathurusingha unleashed him on the international stage in 2015. Mustafizur’s performances against Pakistan, India, and South Africa were nothing short of revelatory. His cutters left batsmen bewildered, and his unassuming demeanour only added to his mystique. The cricketing world sat up and took notice as Fizz became an overnight sensation. 

The Magic of Fizz 

Mustafizur Rahman is not your archetypal fast bowler. He does not possess the raw pace of a Shoaib Akhtar, the swing mastery of Wasim Akram, or the menacing bouncers of Mitchell Johnson. Instead, his genius lies in his subtlety. Clocking in at a modest 120-135 km/h, Mustafizur relies on guile, precision, and his trademark off-cutters to outwit batsmen. 

The off-cutter, his pièce de résistance, is a delivery that seems innocuous at first glance. With no discernible change in action, the ball leaves his hand with a scrambled seam, gripping the surface and deviating unpredictably. Muttiah Muralitharan once remarked, “In Mustafizur’s case, he can bowl the slower ball without any significant change in his action, making it very difficult for the batsman to pick up the variation. This is a real skill.” 

Fizz’s mastery of deception lies in his ability to mask his intentions. The batsman sees no change in arm speed, no telegraphed signals of a slower ball. Yet, as the ball lands on the pitch, it grips and turns like a spinner’s delivery, leaving even the most seasoned players grasping at air. 

The Evolution of a Craftsman 

Like all great artists, Mustafizur has evolved over time. Injuries in 2016 threatened to derail his progress, but under the guidance of Courtney Walsh, he underwent meticulous rehabilitation. Today, he is a more complete bowler. He has added new dimensions to his repertoire, including the ability to move the old ball and fire yorkers into the blockhole with unerring accuracy. 

His ability to bowl around the wicket and exploit angles has drawn comparisons to Wasim Akram, though Fizz’s approach is less destructive and more cerebral. His bowling is a study in subtlety, a blend of skill and strategy that keeps batsmen guessing. 

The X-Factor 

Mustafizur’s impact extends beyond his wicket-taking abilities. During Chandika Hathurusingha’s tenure, Fizz was the linchpin of a four-man pace attack that marked a paradigm shift in Bangladesh cricket. Once reliant on left-arm spinners, the team now boasted a pace arsenal led by Mashrafe Mortaza, Rubel Hossain, Taskin Ahmed, and Mustafizur. This transformation injected new life into Bangladesh’s cricketing identity, and Fizz was at the heart of it. 

What sets Mustafizur apart is his ability to rise to the occasion. Whether it’s bamboozling India’s batting stalwarts or dismantling South Africa’s lineup, Fizz thrives under pressure. His performances have often overshadowed even the omnipresent Shakib Al Hasan, a testament to his extraordinary talent. 

A Gift to Be Cherished 

Mustafizur Rahman is not merely a bowler; he is an artist whose canvas is the cricket pitch. His cutters are brushstrokes, and his variations are a palette of colours that paint a picture of ingenuity. In a cricketing world dominated by raw power and aggression, Fizz offers a refreshing contrast—a reminder that subtlety and skill still have a place in the modern game. 

Bangladesh is fortunate to have a talent like Mustafizur Rahman. But with such gifts comes responsibility. The cricketing fraternity must allow Fizz the freedom to express himself, to play the game on his terms. As Eric Clapton once said, “In playing, my greatest gift was to express the way I felt.” Mustafizur’s brilliance lies in his ability to do just that—to bring joy to millions with every delivery he bowls. 

The Legacy of Fizz 

The world has witnessed the artistry of Bill Voce, Alan Davidson, and Wasim Akram. Now, it is Mustafizur Rahman’s turn to enchant us. His poetry is quieter, less destructive, but no less beautiful. As he continues to weave his magic, let us cherish this special gift from Bangladesh—a bowler who reminds us that cricket, at its heart, is an art form. 

Fizz is not just a cricketer; he is a celebration of ingenuity, a symbol of hope, and a testament to the beauty of the game. Let us savour every moment of his journey, for talents like his are as rare as they are precious.  

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Morning of Mayhem: Bangladesh's Collapse and Mustafizur's Resolve

The second morning of the second Test was nothing short of a nightmare for Bangladesh, evoking memories of their early Test-playing days. A team that has steadily improved since 2015 suddenly appeared to regress, resembling a novice side overwhelmed by the occasion. Five wickets fell for just three runs—a catastrophic collapse reminiscent of a bygone era when such implosions were almost routine. In today’s context, however, such a debacle is difficult to digest, given the strides Bangladesh has made in the longer format of the game. 

Childish Dismissals and a Shattered Top Order 

The dismissals were not the result of unplayable deliveries but rather a series of schoolboy errors. Liton Das, expected to anchor the innings, played a loose shot away from his body with no discernible footwork, dragging a Suranga Lakmal delivery onto his stumps. Mahmudullah Riyad, the stand-in captain, was undone by a peach from Akila Dananjaya, but Sabbir Rahman followed with an ill-advised stroke that sent him back without troubling the scorers. The tail offered little resistance, leaving Mehidy Hasan Miraz stranded and stunned at the other end. 

Sri Lanka’s lead, already significant, grew into a towering advantage, with every additional run piling pressure on the beleaguered hosts. A deficit of over 100 runs on such a tricky surface is daunting, but what compounded the misery was the lack of fight. 

A Team Without a Backbone 

This Bangladesh side lacks the resilience that once defined them under the stewardship of Chandika Hathurusingha. Back then, the Tigers were known for their tenacity and their ability to claw back from impossible situations. Today, they resemble an ice sculpture in the desert—melting under the relentless heat of pressure. 

The pitch, offering sharp turn and variable bounce from the good-length area, was tailor-made for Bangladesh’s spinners to exploit. Yet, neither Taijul Islam nor Abdur Razzak could rise to the occasion. Taijul, who impressed on Day 1 with fuller lengths, inexplicably reverted to bowling shorter and wider, leaking runs in the process. Razzak, on the other hand, struggled with his line, frequently drifting to the leg side—a cardinal sin on a turning track. 

Negative Tactics and Sri Lanka’s Resurgence 

Instead of attacking, the spinners adopted a containment strategy, a defensive approach that proved both futile and counterproductive. Their lack of aggression allowed Sri Lanka’s batsmen, particularly Roshen Silva, to settle in and capitalize. Silva’s wagon wheel revealed the extent of Bangladesh’s wayward bowling, with runs flowing freely through backward point, cover, long-off, and fine leg. 

Mehidy Hasan Miraz toiled valiantly at one end, probing and testing the batsmen, but he was let down by the lack of support from the other bowlers. The collective energy of the team visibly sagged, shoulders drooping as Sri Lanka’s lead continued to grow. 

Mustafizur Rahman: A Beacon of Hope 

Amid the gloom, one man stood tall—Mustafizur Rahman. The left-arm pacer was a shining example of how to bowl with intent and precision, even on a surface favouring spinners. 

In the 56th over, Mustafizur was handed the ball for a short burst, and he delivered spectacularly. Operating from around the wicket, he pitched a delivery on a good length that moved away just enough to induce an edge from Dilruwan Perera, caught by Liton Das. The very next ball, he tempted Akila Dananjaya into a similar mistake, with Liton completing another sharp catch. A hat-trick was on the cards, but Lakmal managed to survive. 

Mustafizur’s spell was a masterclass in controlled aggression. Mixing his trademark cutters with conventional deliveries, he consistently hit the good and back-of-a-length areas, extracting movement and unsettling the batsmen. His ability to generate contrast swing at pace added another layer of complexity to the Sri Lankan lineup. 

Even earlier in the innings, Mustafizur had been Bangladesh’s most effective bowler. His relentless focus on attacking the top of the off-stump set him apart from his colleagues, who often strayed into defensive lines. His positive intent throughout the day was a lesson for his teammates, highlighting the importance of belief and purpose in the face of adversity. 

 The Road Ahead 

While Sri Lanka’s lead looms large and Bangladesh’s batting frailties have been laid bare, Mustafizur’s performance offers a glimmer of hope. His fiery spell serves as a reminder that resilience and intent can turn the tide, even in dire circumstances. For Bangladesh to salvage something from this Test, they must channel the fighting spirit that once defined them and take a leaf out of Mustafizur’s book. Only then can they hope to rewrite the narrative of this forgettable morning. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Day 3: Sri Lanka Dominate on a Chittagong Featherbed

 It was a day of toil and tedium for Bangladesh as Sri Lanka, led by a masterclass from Kusal Mendis (196) and a fluent 173 from Dhananjaya de Silva, ended Day 3 of the first Test in Chittagong at a commanding 504 for 3. Roshen Silva added an unbeaten 87 to the mix, further deepening Bangladesh's woes on a pitch that has turned into a veritable batting paradise. Sri Lanka now trail Bangladesh’s first innings total of 513 by just nine runs, with seven wickets still in hand.

While the scoreboard painted a picture of dominance, the story of the day was the Chittagong surface, which has effectively neutralized the contest. The track, offering little to no assistance for bowlers, has already yielded over a thousand runs in just three days. Even a member of the Bangladesh team’s support staff was caught napping during the monotony of the day’s play—a telling image of the grind that unfolded.

The Revival of Mendis and de Silva

Six months ago, both Kusal Mendis and Dhananjaya de Silva were grappling with form issues. However, the benign conditions in Chittagong seemed tailor-made for their resurgence. The duo batted with elegance and authority, scoring at a brisk rate of 3.5 runs per over. Mendis’ innings, in particular, was a study in balance, as he drove, cut, and flicked with precision to anchor Sri Lanka’s reply.

De Silva, meanwhile, was in imperious touch, mixing caution with aggression. His innings not only showcased his technical prowess but also his ability to accelerate when required. Together, they made Bangladesh’s bowling attack look toothless, milking runs with ease.

Bangladesh’s Spinners: Toil Without Reward

The three-pronged spin attack of Taijul Islam, Mehidy Hasan Miraz, and Sunzamul Islam bore the brunt of Sri Lanka’s dominance, sending down a combined 117 overs for 379 runs. Mehidy, in particular, struggled to find the rhythm, conceding runs at an alarming economy rate of 5.10. While there were occasional attempts to vary pace and trajectory, the lack of bite and pace on the deliveries rendered these efforts largely ineffective.

In the early part of the day, Bangladesh’s spinners bowled at speeds hovering around 75 to 80 km/h, far too slow to trouble batsmen on this placid surface. By the final session, they marginally increased their speeds to 80-87 km/h, but the damage had already been done. The spinners’ inability to adapt quickly to the conditions underscored the limitations of a one-dimensional attack.

Mustafizur Rahman: A Lone Warrior

On a day when bowlers were consigned to the role of spectators, Mustafizur Rahman stood out with his skill and intent. With the first new ball, he consistently probed the good and full-length areas, generating movement off the seam and beating the bat on several occasions. His ability to bowl with precision from both over and around the wicket added variety to his attack.

Mustafiz’s second spell with the new ball was even more impressive. Recognizing the futility of defensive bowling on such a lifeless pitch, he opted for an aggressive approach, mixing short-pitched deliveries with off-cutters, away swingers, and in-cutters. This attacking mindset accounted for the wicket of Dhananjaya de Silva, who fell to a well-directed short ball while attempting to accelerate. De Silva’s dismissal marked a brief period of control for Bangladesh, as Sri Lanka’s scoring rate dipped to 2.7 runs per over in the final session.

What set Mustafiz apart was his unrelenting pursuit of wickets. He attacked the top of off-stump with precision and wasn’t afraid to pitch the ball on middle and leg to induce movement back into the right-handers. Even when these tactics carried the risk of being punished, Mustafiz’s courage and commitment to his craft were evident.

A Missed Opportunity for Bangladesh’s Think Tank

In hindsight, Bangladesh’s decision to field three spinners and only two pacers appears shortsighted. On a track that offered no assistance to spin, an additional pacer could have provided Mustafizur with much-needed support and added a cutting edge to the attack. The absence of a second seamer capable of exploiting reverse swing or maintaining pressure with pace was glaring.

The lack of balance in the bowling attack has left Bangladesh reliant on individual brilliance rather than a cohesive unit. Mustafizur’s efforts deserve commendation, but Test cricket is seldom won by lone warriors. A more proactive approach in team selection and strategy will be crucial if Bangladesh hopes to compete on unforgiving surfaces.

Looking Ahead

With two days still to play, Sri Lanka will look to bat Bangladesh out of the game, piling on a lead that could put the hosts under pressure in the fourth innings. For Bangladesh, the focus will be on damage control and salvaging pride. However, unless the pitch undergoes a dramatic transformation, the prospect of a result in this Test seems as remote as any assistance for the bowlers on this Chittagong deck.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar   

March: The Month of Triumph and Resilience for Bangladesh

March in Bangladesh’s history is no mere page in the calendar—it is a living testament to resilience, courage, and the unyielding will to stand free. In 1971, the month’s final week ignited the nation’s defining struggle: the Liberation War. On March 25, the West Pakistani military unleashed a night of brutality in Dhaka, but the flames they sought to extinguish only blazed higher. Within two days, Major Ziaur Rahman’s declaration of independence—broadcast from Kalurghat Radio Station on behalf of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman—rang across the land, a call that transformed fear into defiance.

Decades later, March would again test Bangladesh’s spirit—not on a battlefield, but on a cricket field. In 2017, amid the shadow of terrorist attacks and national anxiety, the Bangladesh cricket team stepped into Colombo for their landmark 100th Test. Against Sri Lanka, a nation long dominant on its home turf, Bangladesh sought not only victory but affirmation—a moment that could stand alongside the great turning points of their sporting history.

Day One: A Statement of Intent

The P Sara Oval greeted Bangladesh with ceremonial warmth, but the challenge ahead was severe. Losing the toss could have tilted the balance, yet Mustafizur Rahman’s early incision and Mehedi Hasan’s guile dismantled Sri Lanka’s top order. By lunch, the hosts were tottering at 70 for 4. Chandimal’s defiance—86 not out at stumps—kept them afloat, but Bangladesh had made their presence felt.

There was more than skill at play; there was belief. Tamim Iqbal’s constant chatter in the field, Shakib Al Hasan’s tight spells, Mushfiqur Rahim’s sharp glove work—all spoke of a side determined to seize the moment. This was no ordinary start; it was a declaration that Bangladesh would not be passengers in their centennial Test.

The Middle Passage: Endurance and Errors

Cricket’s narrative often swings on discipline. On the second day, Bangladesh’s bowlers found themselves on the wrong end of Chandimal’s patience. His century, built alongside Herath and Lakmal, lifted Sri Lanka to 338. In reply, Bangladesh began brightly—Tamim and Soumya Sarkar stroking a fluent stand—but wickets at crucial intervals stunted momentum. By stumps, the scoreboard reflected both promise and peril.

It was on the third day that Bangladesh turned the match’s tide. Starting on 214 for 5, they needed a seasoned hand to anchor the innings. Shakib answered with a measured, risk-averse century—his fifth in Tests—while debutant Mosaddek Hossain added a composed 75. Their seventh-wicket stand of 131 propelled Bangladesh to 467, a lead of 129. For only the second time in their history, they had taken a first-innings lead away from home while batting second.

Day Four: The Spell That Tilted the Game

If Shakib’s innings was the backbone, Mustafizur’s post-lunch spell on day four was the dagger. In oppressive Colombo heat, he bent the ball like a conjurer, dismissing Mendis, Chandimal, and de Silva in a seven-over burst that reshaped the contest. Shakib’s three wickets and Taijul Islam’s late strike ensured Sri Lanka closed with only a 139-run lead. The tension was now palpable—the fourth innings would be the crucible.

Day Five: Crossing the Threshold

Chasing 191 in an away Test is treacherous terrain for Bangladesh, but Tamim and Sabbir Rahman’s 109-run stand for the third wicket was a masterclass in poise. Tamim’s 82 was a blend of caution and calculated aggression, featuring drives through extra cover and a towering six over long-on. Yet, as is often the case in Bangladesh’s history, the finish was not without drama.

Shakib’s dismissal with 29 still required stirred nerves. Mushfiqur narrowly escaped an lbw on review. Mosaddek’s crisp boundaries brought the target within touching distance before he fell. Finally, Mehedi Hasan’s sweep sealed the win—their first ever Test victory over Sri Lanka and a fitting jewel for their 100th match.

The Turning Point Beyond the Field

This victory did not emerge from thin air. It was forged in an hour-long dressing-room meeting after their heavy Galle defeat—a session of candid self-assessment led by coach Chandika Hathurusingha and senior players. They spoke of valuing every run, every saved boundary, every moment of pressure applied. It was not unlike the fabled 2003 Indian World Cup team meeting that sparked a turnaround.

In Colombo, the lessons bore fruit. The bowlers attacked with intelligence; the fielders stayed alert; the batsmen absorbed pressure and built partnerships. Hathurusingha later called Mustafizur’s fourth-day spell “the game changer,” but the real change was deeper—an alignment of focus, effort, and belief.

Conclusion: March, Again

Bangladesh’s win at the P Sara Oval was more than a statistical milestone. It was the proof of a team’s capacity to learn, adapt, and prevail against a formidable home side. For a nation that marks March as the month of liberation, the victory was symbolic—another chapter of resilience, another reaffirmation that perseverance yields triumph.

The 100th Test was not just a cricket match. It was an echo of 1971’s spirit: that under pressure, with the odds against them, Bangladesh can still rise. And if they hold onto the lessons from Colombo—cherishing every run, guarding every chance—they might just find that the place they have always sought to succeed, Test cricket, is now within their grasp.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

A Nation’s Fandom and the Forgotten Imperatives of Test Cricket

Bangladesh cricket finds itself in the throes of rhapsody, fueled by the meteoric rise of Mustafizur Rahman, affectionately known as “Fizz.” Fresh from his triumphant stint in the Indian Premier League, where he played a pivotal role in Sunrisers Hyderabad’s title win, Mustafizur returned home to a hero’s welcome. The reception bordered on the extravagant, with political leaders, media outlets, and fans vying for a piece of his glory. 

While the adulation for Mustafizur is understandable, the frenzy underscores a deeper issue—a tendency to latch onto short-lived euphoria while neglecting long-term priorities. Amid the celebrations, cricketing stakeholders must remember an essential truth: an overcooked biryani, no matter how promising, ultimately disappoints. 

The Bigger Picture: ICC’s Vision for Test Cricket

While Bangladesh immerses itself in Mustafizur mania, a significant development in cricket’s global structure looms on the horizon. ICC Chief Executive David Richardson recently proposed a transformative idea to revitalize Test cricket—a format many fear is losing its lustre in the modern era. 

Richardson’s plan envisions a two-division Test structure with promotion and relegation, mirroring the systems used in football. This change would not only provide a competitive framework but also address the disparity in the quality of matches, ensuring that every Test has context and consequence. 

“There’s a general realization now,” Richardson stated, “that if we’re going to keep Test cricket going well into the future, we can’t just say it’s going to survive on its own. Unless we give meaning to these series, interest in Test cricket will continue to waver.” 

The proposed system could expand to include up to 18 teams, offering opportunities for emerging cricketing nations like Ireland and Afghanistan to participate at the highest level. The structure would allow for promotion from Division 2 to Division 1 and even playoff matches, making the stakes higher for every contest. 

What This Means for Bangladesh

Richardson’s vision should be a wake-up call for Bangladesh. Despite having Test status since 2000, Bangladesh’s performance in the format has been largely underwhelming. Beyond occasional successes against Zimbabwe and a weakened West Indies, the Tigers have struggled to compete with the traditional powerhouses of Test cricket. 

In 2023, they secured draws against South Africa and India due to rain, not resilience. Matches against stronger opponents often end in humiliating defeats, highlighting the gap between Bangladesh and the elite Test-playing nations. If the two-division system is implemented, Bangladesh risks being relegated to Division 2, a scenario that would erase much of the progress they have achieved over the past two decades. 

This is a sobering prospect for a nation that fought hard to earn Test status. The dream of becoming a competitive Test-playing nation inspired a generation of Bangladeshi fans in the 80s and 90s. Losing that credibility would not only be a blow to the team’s morale but also to the nation’s cricketing identity. 

A Misplaced Focus

The Bangladesh cricketing ecosystem—its board, players, and media—seems increasingly enamoured with the shortest format of the game. T20 cricket dominates headlines, sponsorship deals, and fan engagement, relegating Test cricket to a distant afterthought. Yet, it is the Test format that has historically shaped the legacy of great cricketers and nations. 

Bangladesh’s media and cricketing authorities bear responsibility for this decline in Test priorities. Rather than celebrating every fleeting T20 triumph, they must channel their efforts into fostering a robust Test culture. Fans and players alike must recognize that cricket’s truest glory lies in the longest format, where patience, skill, and endurance are rewarded. 

The Road Ahead

To avoid relegation and restore pride in their Test performances, Bangladesh needs a cultural shift. The Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) must prioritize Test cricket in their development plans, investing in infrastructure, nurturing technically sound players, and hiring experts to improve the team’s strategic acumen. 

The media, too, has a vital role to play. Instead of indulging in jingoistic coverage of short-term successes, they must promote the value and nuances of Test cricket, inspiring the next generation to embrace the format. 

Lastly, fans must temper their fleeting infatuations with players like Mustafizur and recognize the broader challenges facing their team. A sustainable cricketing legacy requires more than fleeting adoration; it demands a commitment to the game’s purest form. 

Bangladesh has the potential to thrive as a Test-playing nation, but only if it heeds the lessons of history and responds to the warnings of the present. Otherwise, the nation may find itself relegated—not just in rankings, but in relevance.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The Tale of Mustafizur Rahman: Between Glory and the Allure of Modern Cricket

On a memorable evening in Mirpur, a vociferous crowd witnessed history as a young boy from Satkhira, Mustafizur Rahman, etched his name into cricketing folklore. It was June 18, 2015, the same date that had once seen Bangladesh stun Australia at Cardiff a decade earlier. This time, however, the victims were a full-strength Indian side, humbled by the magic of Mustafizur on his ODI debut. The young left-armer’s unplayable cutters and deceptive variations flummoxed the Indian batting order, earning him a remarkable five-wicket haul—a feat only his compatriot Taskin Ahmed had achieved before him on debut. 

Throughout that series and beyond, Mustafizur continued to dazzle. His spellbinding performances against South Africa, particularly in the Chittagong Test, confirmed that he was not merely a one-series wonder but a generational talent. On that fateful day in Chittagong, the world’s top-ranked Test team collapsed dramatically under the weight of his lethal deliveries. His ability to dismiss three class players—Hashim Amla, Quinton de Kock, and JP Duminy—in one over showcased a bowler of exceptional skill and temperament. Mustafiz wasn’t just good; he had the makings of one of the all-time great left-arm pacers. 

Yet, in the years that followed, Mustafiz’s trajectory began to align with cricket’s newest paradigm—the franchise-driven, fast-paced world of Twenty20 cricket. While his performances in leagues like the IPL garnered global attention, a deeper question emerged: would the glittering lure of T20 cricket steer Mustafiz away from the longer formats, where legends are truly forged? 

The Allure and the Cost of T20 Leagues 

There is no denying the appeal of T20 cricket. It is quick, glamorous, and immensely profitable, offering players global recognition in the blink of an eye. Mustafiz’s success in the IPL, where his cutters became the talk of the tournament, catapulted him into the global spotlight. Franchise teams in England, Australia, and beyond began vying for his services. Bangladeshi fans, long starved of global heroes, embraced his rise with unbridled enthusiasm. 

However, as a cricket romantic, I find myself torn. T20 leagues, for all their excitement, rarely mold players into enduring legends. Cricketing immortality is not achieved through quick bursts of brilliance but through sustained excellence in the crucible of Test cricket. The likes of Viv Richards, Imran Khan, Brian Lara, and Wasim Akram are remembered not for their exploits in short-format cricket but for their ability to dominate the game’s most challenging format. 

The experience of senior West Indian players in T20 leagues serves as a cautionary tale. While stars like Chris Gayle and Andre Russell have achieved phenomenal success in franchise cricket, the West Indies' decline in Test cricket has been stark and painful. Their prowess in T20 leagues has done little to revive the fortunes of their national team, a stark reminder that T20 cricket, for all its glamour, cannot replace the foundational rigors of first-class cricket. 

The Crucible of First-Class Cricket 

Mustafizur’s immense talent deserves a stage where it can be nurtured and refined. Unfortunately, T20 leagues, with their emphasis on instant results, offer little room for the kind of technical and mental growth that first-class cricket fosters. The likes of Kumar Sangakkara and Ajinkya Rahane understood this well. Sangakkara chose the grind of County Cricket to elevate his game, while Rahane turned to the Ranji Trophy to rediscover his form. These formats test a cricketer’s patience, resilience, and adaptability—qualities essential for success at the highest level. 

For Mustafizur, a stint in County Cricket could be transformative. The exposure to different conditions, coupled with mentorship from seasoned coaches and players, would help him evolve into a more complete bowler. Shakib Al Hasan’s time at Worcestershire in 2010 is a testament to how such experiences can elevate a player’s game. Shakib returned from County Cricket as a more mature and versatile cricketer, and the same could be true for Mustafiz. 

The Road Ahead 

As Mustafiz continues to dazzle in T20 leagues, the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) and his well-wishers face a critical responsibility: to ensure that his talent is not confined to the shortest format. He must be encouraged to embrace the challenges of Test and first-class cricket, where his legacy can truly take shape. A bowler of Mustafizur’s calibre deserves to be remembered not as a T20 specialist but as one of the game’s all-time greats. 

Test cricket remains the ultimate yardstick of greatness. While T20 cricket may provide the fireworks, it is in the marathon of five-day cricket that true legends are forged. Players like Viv Richards and Graeme Pollock continue to be revered not because of their T20 exploits but because they excelled in the format that demanded the most from them. 

For Mustafizur Rahman, the path to immortality lies not in the glittering arenas of franchise cricket but in the quiet, grinding fields of first-class cricket. It is my fervent hope that he chooses this path, for it is only then that he can fulfil his immense potential and secure his place among the pantheon of cricketing greats.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar   

The Rise of a 'New Bangladesh': A Cricketing Renaissance

 

Not long ago, Bangladesh's cricket team was often dismissed as an afterthought on the international stage. Mocked mercilessly in social media and labelled "whipping boys" of the cricketing world, their presence in the arena of giants was frequently questioned by pundits and critics alike. Their struggles, particularly in Test and one-day cricket, made them a perennial subject of ridicule, a sentiment painfully endured by the nation’s passionate fans. 

Yet, within mere months, this narrative has been turned on its head. Today, the term, ' New Bangladesh’ reverberates not just within the country but across the cricketing globe. A side once synonymous with defeat has evolved into a symbol of hope, confidence, and resilience, culminating in a stunning series victory against South Africa—a triumph that was as commanding as it was historic. 

 From Underdogs to Fearsome Contenders 

The second and third ODIs of the South Africa series exemplify Bangladesh’s metamorphosis. Historically, matches between the two sides attracted little attention, given the Tigers’ predictable defeats against the formidable Proteas. Even this year, early losses in the T20 series and the first ODI suggested a continuation of that bleak tradition. 

But what unfolded in Chittagong was nothing short of extraordinary. Bangladesh scripted one of the greatest comebacks in their cricketing history, overturning decades of disappointment to clinch the series. This victory wasn’t a fluke—it was a ruthless, calculated performance that left little doubt about the team’s new-found credentials. 

The triumph was particularly sweet for a nation starved of success at the highest level. Until now, Bangladesh had only once recovered from a series deficit to secure victory—against Zimbabwe in 2005. Against cricket’s elite, such a feat had seemed unattainable. But this time, the Tigers roared back with an authority that silenced doubters and ignited the belief that this truly is a 'New Bangladesh'. 

What Defines the 'New Bangladesh'?

The emergence of this 'New Bangladesh' is not an isolated phenomenon but the result of years of groundwork, careful nurturing of talent, and a collective shift in mindset. The transformation lies not just in individual performances but in a team-wide evolution marked by fearlessness, discipline, and ambition. 

 1. The Power of Youth

The infusion of young, exciting talents has been instrumental in reshaping the team. Players like Soumya Sarkar, Litton Das, and Mustafizur Rahman have redefined Bangladesh cricket with their bold and fearless approach. 

- Soumya’s audacious handling of short-pitched deliveries, epitomized by his inventive periscope shot, speaks volumes of his confidence. 

- Litton’s poise under pressure and willingness to take on fast bowlers with daring hook shots reflects a fearlessness once foreign to Bangladesh cricket. 

- Mustafizur’s devastating cutters and unrelenting accuracy have turned him into one of the most formidable bowlers in the limited-overs format. 

These players embody a fresh, fearless brand of cricket, setting the tone for the team. Their energy has been infectious, inspiring seasoned campaigners like Mashrafe Mortaza, Shakib Al Hasan, and Mahmudullah Riyad to elevate their own performances. 

 2. Leadership and Environment

The *new Bangladesh* owes much of its rise to an enabling environment fostered by the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB), head coach Chandika Hathurusingha, and bowling coach Heath Streak. These mentors have not only honed the technical skills of the players but also instilled a belief in their ability to compete with the best. 

Under Mashrafe Mortaza’s astute captaincy, the team has learned to stay composed under pressure. His leadership style—both as a tactician and as a motivator—has been crucial in creating a cohesive unit. Meanwhile, senior players like Shakib and Mushfiqur have seamlessly blended experience with youthful exuberance, ensuring that the team’s progress is built on a solid foundation. 

The Challenges Ahead

While the 'New Bangladesh' has risen to prominence in the limited-overs format, sustaining this success will require consistency, adaptability, and a focus on the longer formats of the game. The team’s meteoric rise has sparked immense expectations, but they must guard against complacency and remain hungry for success.  

The real test will be to replicate this form in foreign conditions, where Bangladesh has historically struggled. Additionally, transitioning this newfound confidence into Test cricket—a format that demands patience and resilience—will be a challenge. 

 A Nation Transformed 

This resurgence is more than just a cricketing story; it reflects the resilience and determination of a nation that refuses to be defined by its past. The 'New Bangladesh; has given its people a reason to believe, proving that with talent, preparation, and the right mindset, even the unlikeliest of contenders can rise to greatness. 

As they continue their journey, the Tigers must remember that this is not the end of the road but the beginning of a new era. An era where they are no longer underdogs, but fearsome contenders capable of taking on the best. An era where they no longer play to survive but to dominate. This is the 'New Bangladesh'—a team that dreams big and delivers even bigger. 

Thank You
Faisal Caesar 

The Dawn of a New Era: Bangladesh’s Evolution in Embracing Pace Bowling

Bangladesh’s cricketing identity has long been intertwined with the dominance of left-arm spinners. For years, the team leaned heavily on their spin arsenal, often deploying them as early as the first innings, sidelining pace bowlers to a mere supporting role. This strategy, coupled with spin-friendly pitches, perpetuated a cycle where seamers were seen as secondary contributors—used sparingly with the new ball and fading into irrelevance as the game progressed. 

However, this fixation on spin came at a cost. It overshadowed the potential of Bangladesh’s pace bowlers and stymied their development. For far too long, the cricketing fraternity ignored the fact that Bangladesh possessed seamers who, if nurtured and utilized effectively, could make a significant impact—even on the flat tracks of the subcontinent. 

The Test match against India at Fatullah in 2015 exemplified this outdated philosophy. Bangladesh fielded just one pace bowler in a team built around spin, reflecting a defensive mindset that prioritized avoiding defeat over striving for victory. The result was predictable—a rain-marred draw that left fans and critics alike questioning the team’s approach. The match underscored an essential truth: in cricket, timidity is seldom rewarded. 

 A Shift in Philosophy

The Fatullah Test’s defensive team selection starkly contrasted with the fearless brand of cricket Bangladesh had displayed earlier that year during the ICC World Cup in Australia and New Zealand. The Tigers had adopted an attacking approach that captured the imagination of fans and critics worldwide. It was a strategy that demanded boldness not only in execution but also in team composition—a lesson that came to fruition just days later in the first ODI against India at Mirpur. 

This time, the team embraced a radically different approach, fielding a pace-heavy attack that paid dividends in spectacular fashion. The decision to include four pace bowlers proved to be a masterstroke. Bangladesh not only outplayed India but also showcased a blueprint for future success, anchored in faith in their seamers. 

 The Rise of the Pacers

In the Mirpur ODI, the spotlight shifted decisively to Bangladesh’s pace battery. From the first ball, the young duo of Taskin Ahmed and Mustafizur Rahman set the tone with aggression and intent, unsettling India’s vaunted batting lineup on a traditionally placid subcontinental surface. 

Taskin bowled with pace and precision, maintaining a probing line and length that left the Indian batsmen uncomfortable. Meanwhile, Mustafizur delivered a spell for the ages. His ability to vary pace and extract movement both ways was nothing short of mesmerising. His five-wicket haul not only dismantled India’s chase but also announced his arrival as a bowler of exceptional promise. 

The supporting cast - Mashrafe Mortaza and Rubel Hossain—ensured sustained pressure throughout, preventing any Indian batter from settling. For a change, the spinners, who had long been the focal point of Bangladesh’s bowling plans, took a backseat, with the pacers spearheading the charge. 

 Breaking the Spin Dependency

The Mirpur victory was not merely a triumph over a formidable opponent; it was a watershed moment in Bangladesh cricket. It demonstrated that a well-rounded attack, with an emphasis on pace, could thrive even on subcontinental wickets. For decades, India’s batsmen had struggled against quality pace attacks, and Bangladesh exploited this vulnerability to perfection. 

This performance also highlighted a crucial cricketing truism: pace bowling is indispensable for creating a balanced and successful team. Seamers bring a dimension of unpredictability, especially on flat tracks, where spinners often struggle to penetrate. The decision to trust their pacers was a bold departure from tradition, and it paid off handsomely. 

 The Way Forward 

The Mirpur win was more than just a momentary triumph; it symbolized a broader cultural shift within Bangladesh cricket. The days of relying exclusively on spin as the primary weapon must give way to a more balanced approach. To build a formidable team, the think tank must continue to invest in pace bowlers, providing them with the resources, mentorship, and match experience necessary to thrive. 

Bangladesh’s management must also ensure that pitches are designed to be more competitive, offering assistance to both seamers and spinners. Sporting wickets not only produce high-quality cricket but also foster the development of versatile players who can adapt to diverse conditions. 

The journey will not be without challenges. Developing and sustaining a pipeline of quality pacers requires long-term vision, infrastructure, and consistent backing. But the Mirpur performance proved that the potential is there. With bowlers like Mustafizur and Taskin leading the charge, Bangladesh has a golden opportunity to redefine its cricketing identity. 

Conclusion 

Cricket is a game that rewards bravery and innovation. Bangladesh’s triumph at Mirpur was a testament to what can be achieved when a team sheds its inhibitions and embraces boldness. The young pacers breathed new life into the Tigers’ attack, delivering a performance that resonated far beyond the boundaries of the Sher-e-Bangla Stadium. 

The message was clear: the future of Bangladesh cricket lies in a balanced attack, where pace and spin coexist to complement each other. If this philosophy takes root, the Tigers can look forward to a brighter, more competitive future on the world stage.

Change is in the air, and it is blowing at the speed of Bangladesh’s rising pacers.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar