Test Twenty: The Gimmick That Could Finish What T20 Started

Cricket has always evolved — sometimes gracefully, sometimes by force. But the unveiling of Test Twenty on October 16, conceived by sports entrepreneur Gaurav Bahirvani of The One One Six Network, feels less like evolution and more like erosion. Sold as a revolutionary “fourth format,” this new hybrid — part Test, part T20 — could end up stripping cricket of the very thing that made it beautiful: its patience, its poetry, its purpose.

A Test in Name Only

On paper, Test Twenty sounds clever: 80 overs in total, two innings of 20 overs per side, all wrapped up neatly in a single day. It promises the strategic nuance of Tests and the entertainment punch of T20s. The results — win, loss, draw, or tie — mimic tradition, while the structure is designed for the modern attention span.

But let’s be honest: this isn’t a reinvention of Test cricket. It’s a repackaged short-form product dressed up in nostalgia. What makes a Test isn’t just two innings and whites — it’s the slow burn, the psychological tug-of-war, the narrative that stretches and morphs over five days. Compressing that into a few hours doesn’t preserve the format’s soul; it suffocates it.

The Fast-Fooding of a Fine Meal

We’ve been down this road before. T20 was meant to be a supplement, not a substitute. It was the dessert that ended up replacing the meal. The explosion of franchise cricket — from the IPL to The Hundred — has already tilted the balance irreversibly toward entertainment over endurance. Players now retire from Tests at 30 to chase league contracts; boards prioritize broadcast windows over bilateral series.

Now, Test Twenty threatens to finish what T20 started — to turn even the last bastion of cricket’s authenticity into another bite-sized commodity. The message is clear: if something doesn’t fit the digital clock, it doesn’t deserve to exist.

The Allure of Technology, The Absence of Soul

The format’s biggest boast is its AI Discovery Engine, a data-driven system using motion sensors and video analysis to scout talent “impartially.” It’s a fascinating tool — but it misunderstands what cricket’s romance is built on. Algorithms can identify technique; they can’t identify temperament. Data can measure bat speed; it can’t capture the quiet defiance of a batter surviving the last hour in fading light.

Cricket’s legacy is human. It thrives in imperfection — in the missed edge, the fading pitch, the weary spell on the fifth morning. To replace that with AI-driven metrics is to miss the point entirely.

Innovation or Invasion?

The first Test Twenty season, set for January 2026, will feature six global franchises — three from Indian cities, and three from Dubai, London, and the United States. Predictably, the emphasis is on global reach and television appeal. Once again, the game’s guardians are confusing growth with glamour.

Cricket doesn’t need another format; it needs conviction. Test cricket doesn’t need a facelift; it needs faith. The answer to declining Test interest isn’t to dilute it — it’s to defend it, to invest in it, to tell its stories better.

What’s Left When Everything’s Shortened?

Test Twenty might market itself as innovation, but it risks being an obituary. Test cricket isn’t just a format — it’s the conscience of the sport. It’s where cricket’s mythology lives, where legends are forged not by sixes but by survival.

We’ve already lost enough of the game’s soul to the ticking clock of commercial convenience. The question now is simple: when every version of cricket is fast, who will still have the patience to watch the game unfold slowly — beautifully — as it once did?

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Cricket: From Patience and Character to a Game of Entertainment and Commerce

The Golden Era: A Symphony of Patience and Skill

When I first began to follow cricket and football during the 1980s and 1990s, cricket stood tall as a game of endurance, artistry, and strategy. It was not merely a contest of bat and ball, but a theatre of discipline and mental resilience. Test cricket, in particular, was the ultimate trial—where each session and each delivery tested a player’s character and temperament. Patience was not just a virtue; it was the foundation of greatness.

One-day cricket (the 50–over format) emerged as a bridge between tradition and modernity. It offered a beautiful balance—where careful construction and bold aggression could coexist. It added vibrancy to the game without sacrificing its soul.

This was an era illuminated by legends: Viv Richards’ swagger, Gordon Greenidge’s aggression and solidity of Desmond Haynes, Malcolm Marshall and Curtly Ambrose’s fire,  Brian Lara’s artistry, Workhorse like Stamina of Walsh, Imran Khan’s all-round brilliance, Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis' swing and pace, Richard Hadlee and Glenn McGrath's precision, Steve Waugh’s grit, David Gower and Mark Waugh's style, Ponting, Hayden, Langer and Gilchrist's effectiveness, Abdul Qadir and Shane Warne’s magic, Allan Border’s resilience, intensity of Martin Crowe, Graham Gooch, Graham Thorpe, Allan Lamb, Michael Atherton, Alec Stewart and Mike Gatting, Javed Miandad’s guile, class of Saeed Anwar and Inzamam-ul-Haq, chicky a TS of Moin Khan, Romesh Kaluwitharana and Salim Yousuf, Sanath Jayasuriya’s revolution, Aravinda de Silva’s finesse, Leadership of Arjuna Ranatunga, Muttiah Muralitharan’s sorcery, impact of Vaas, Gary Kirsten's class, Jacques Kallis’ completeness, Allan Donald’s pace, the mastery of Sunil Gavaskar, Sachin Tendulkar, Kapil Dev, Dilip Vengsarkar, Mohinder Amarnath, Rahul Dravid, Sourav Ganguly, Anil Kumble and VVS Laxman, the impactful display of Flower Brothers, Heath Streak, Alastair Campbell, David Houghton, Eddo Brandes , Paul Strang, Henry Olonga and Neil Johnson—the list is endless. 

These were not merely players; they were custodians of cricket’s enduring spirit - fit for any era - on any testing conditions. 

The Rise of T20: Speed, Spectacle, and the Lure of Wealth

The early 21st century ushered in a new epoch, Twenty20 cricket. Initially introduced as a novelty to attract crowds, it soon became the heartbeat of modern cricket. Short bursts of excitement, relentless hitting, and guaranteed results transformed the game into a spectacle tailor-made for television audiences.

Yet, this transformation came at a cost. The essence of cricket began to erode. Players earned immense wealth and global recognition, but the depth of the craft diminished. Batters became addicted to extravagant strokes, their defense weakened, and footwork—once the bedrock of technique—grew careless.

Statistics flourished, but substance declined. James Anderson’s 700 wickets, remarkable as they are, came in an age where batsmen are often reckless. Ten thousand runs, once the Everest of batting, now appear more achievable, aided by flatter pitches, batting-friendly laws, and a culture designed to glorify aggression.

Media, Franchises, and the Changing Priorities

The media’s obsession with franchises and the glamour of league cricket has further altered the game’s identity. Commentators heap praise on franchise heroes, while technically sound, consistent performers often go unnoticed.

The shift in priorities is stark. The pride of representing one’s country has diminished for many players, overshadowed by the allure of lucrative leagues. Cricket boards struggle, national teams weaken, and fans find themselves fragmented. What once united nations is now often reduced to fragmented loyalties, tied to franchises rather than flags.

Powerhouses and the Forgotten Few

In the 1990s, nearly every Test-playing nation posed a serious challenge. The West Indies, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, even Zimbabwe, were forces to be reckoned with. Today, the cricketing world is polarized: India, Australia, England, South Africa, and New Zealand dominate, while others languish in decline.

The fall of West Indies, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka is not just disappointing—it is tragic. Once brimming with champions, they now struggle to compete. Bangladesh, Afghanistan, and Ireland have emerged as spirited “giant-killers,” but remain on the periphery of consistent dominance. Zimbabwe, ravaged by political turmoil, has all but vanished from the competitive stage.

Gambling, Fixing, and the Shadows of T20

T20’s meteoric rise has also carried darker undercurrents—gambling, spot-fixing, and corruption. The brevity of the format makes manipulation easier, and leagues across the globe have become breeding grounds for illicit money flows.

It's not that such things didn't exist before T20 arrived, but in the longer formats, it's never easy to fix a match. The shorter the format, the easier it becomes for fixing - no wonder T20 is the fertile ground for fixing. 

From tea stalls in the subcontinent to betting websites across the region and beyond, the shadow economy of cricket thrives. Bangladesh Premier League, Indian Premier League, The Hundred, even women’s tournaments, are exploited by gamblers. Arrests, scandals, and even violent crimes linked to betting highlight the corrosive influence of this culture.

It is not merely the game that suffers; society itself absorbs the damage. Young people, drawn by the glamour of easy money, slip into destructive habits. What was once a game of inspiration risks becoming a conduit for vice.

The Soul in Crisis—and the Way Forward

In its bid to evolve, cricket has misplaced its soul. Once a symbol of patience, character, and national pride, it now often resembles a commercial enterprise fueled by entertainment value and financial stakes.

Yet, hope remains. To restore balance, the guardians of the game must protect the sanctity of Test cricket, reinvigorate the 50–over format as the bridge between eras, and regulate the excesses of franchise cricket. Without such recalibration, cricket risks becoming a hollow spectacle—loud but shallow.

Conclusion: Cricket Belongs to All of Us

For over fifteen years, I have written as a cricket lover, not merely as a spectator. To me, cricket is not just entertainment; it is culture, history, and inspiration. It has shaped generations and built character.

The custodians of the game must remember: progress must not come at the cost of cricket’s soul. The game belongs to all of us, and its future lies in striking a balance between innovation and tradition, between entertainment and essence.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

The Arc of Mastery: James Anderson’s evolution from promising talent to All-Time Great

Six Overs. Forty-six Runs. One Wicket 

That was James Anderson’s unceremonious debut on a cool December evening in 2002 at the Melbourne Cricket Ground during the VB Tri-Series. Bowling alongside James Kirtley, Anderson showed glimpses of swing, but his control was erratic. On that night, as Adam Gilchrist launched an onslaught en route to 124, Anderson looked like just another English quick—one more in the long line of fast bowlers since the ’90s who teased with promise but faded away quietly, like morning mist dissipating under the first rays of sunlight. 

But Anderson did not fade. 

Within months, he showcased flashes of something more. In Cape Town during the 2003 World Cup, he sliced through Pakistan’s batting order, exposing their fragile middle and lower order. Weeks later, he tore through Zimbabwe on his Test debut at Lord’s. Later that summer, Pakistan felt his wrath again at The Oval. Yet, these early bursts of brilliance were not enough to cement his place. The hard lessons of Test cricket were beginning to reveal themselves: it demanded more than raw talent.

 The Making of an Outcast

By the mid-2000s, England’s bowling attack was dominated by pace, height, and aggression. Steve Harmison, Matthew Hoggard, Simon Jones, and Andrew Flintoff embodied a blend of power and discipline, traits Anderson’s swing-centric game lacked. While they flourished, Anderson found himself on the sidelines. His early promise seemed destined to be squandered, and for a time, he became better known as a fashion model than as a dependable bowler in whites. 

Struggling for consistency, Anderson tinkered with his bowling action to gain extra pace - a decision that almost backfired. His strength lay in swing and seam, not raw speed, and the changes nearly robbed him of the attributes that made him dangerous. With selectors favouring faster bowlers like Liam Plunkett and Sajid Mahmood, Anderson’s career drifted. He could have been another name lost to history, another "what-if" in England’s long search for world-class bowlers. 

But Anderson was no passenger. He had no interest in being consigned to obscurity. He went back to the grind of county cricket, recalibrating his skills and waiting for his opportunity. Meanwhile, a new crop of global seamers emerged and dazzled: 

- Dale Steyn, lethal with pace and reverse swing. 

- Mohammad Asif, evoking comparisons to Fazal Mahmood with his seam mastery. 

- Mohammad Amir, devastating with new-ball movement. 

- Lasith Malinga, with his slingy action, becoming a white-ball phenomenon. 

Anderson saw these contemporaries rise to fame—only to fade for various reasons. Amir and Asif succumbed to scandal, Steyn pursued the IPL at the expense of Tests, and Malinga quit the red-ball game altogether. Anderson, in contrast, avoided the distractions of stardom and focused quietly on honing his craft. His resolve was clear: *adapt or perish.*

 Transformation through Patience

The turning point came when Anderson re-embraced what made him special—swing and seam. He studied the techniques of his rivals and incorporated them. The "wobble seam" deliveries that Asif had used so effectively became part of Anderson’s repertoire. He sharpened his line and length to Glenn McGrath-like precision, targeting the top of the off-stump with relentless intent. Spell after spell, match after match, he fine-tuned his rhythm. He learned how to manipulate conditions—whether under cloudy skies in England or under oppressive heat on the subcontinent.

Consistency became his mantra. He learned to use every variable—humidity, pitch conditions, even the way the shine wore off the ball—to his advantage. What others saw as obstacles, Anderson viewed as opportunities. The wear and tear on his body, the setbacks, and the competition for places only made him more determined. Slowly, almost imperceptibly, he transformed from a raw talent into a master craftsman.

The Stars Align

There comes a point in every great bowler’s career when everything falls into place. For Anderson, it was a combination of physical mastery, tactical acumen, and mental clarity. The shine on the ball, the dampness (or lack thereof) in the air, the angle of his wrist, the position of his fingers on the seam—each element aligned in perfect harmony. His run-up was precise; his length kissed the bat’s edge with surgical precision. Fielders, now attuned to his subtle craft, snapped up the chances he created. 

The wickets started to tumble - consistently and in all conditions. Anderson’s mastery transcended English pitches. He found success in the blistering heat of Asia, the hard tracks of Australia, and the seam-friendly surfaces of New Zealand. His longevity became his hallmark, defying the odds and outlasting his peers. 

A Testament to Endurance

By the time Anderson had bowled over 40,000 deliveries in Test cricket, he had amassed a staggering 704 Test wickets - with 364 of those coming after the age of 32. His numbers in Asian conditions, often a graveyard for English seamers, are remarkable: 92 wickets at 27.51. He has accounted for 4% of all seam deliveries** bowled in the history of Test cricket. In pursuit of these milestones, Anderson has run close to 430 miles in his bowling run-ups alone. His achievements are not just records; they are a testament to stamina, discipline, and unrelenting ambition.

Since 2014 - after most fast bowlers would have retired—Anderson has taken 224 wickets  at an average of 22.71, proving that his game only grew sharper with age. His success was not accidental but the outcome of sustained hard work, adaptability, and focus. He became the epitome of persistence, redefining what it means to age in a physically demanding sport.

From Raw Talent to Test Cricket Legend

Anderson’s journey defies the familiar narrative of English quicks whose careers flare briefly before being extinguished by injury or inconsistency. His career arc is not just about talent but about the triumph of discipline over doubt, persistence over setbacks, and mastery over mediocrity. He stands as one of the greatest seam bowlers in the history of the game—not because of raw speed or a single standout series, but because he never stopped learning, never stopped evolving.

In a sport that is as much about survival as it is about skill, Anderson has proven that hard work and patience outlast even the brightest of talents. His story is a reminder that age is not a barrier but a measure of experience and that greatness is not a gift but a reward for those willing to strive for it.

And so, 21 years after that chilly night at the MCG, James Anderson has etched his name in the annals of cricketing history, not just as a bowler, but as a symbol of what relentless perseverance can achieve.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Four-Day Test Matches: A Betrayal of Cricket’s Essence

South Africa's proposal to host Zimbabwe in a four-day, day-night match beginning December 26 in Port Elizabeth has sparked an intense debate about the future of Test cricket. Cricket South Africa (CSA) awaits the International Cricket Council’s (ICC) approval to designate the match as an official Test. Yet, the very idea of a truncated Test match raises pressing questions about the sanctity of the game’s longest and most revered format. 

This initiative, presented under the guise of innovation, is deeply troubling. Test cricket is already under threat, with its enduring appeal overshadowed by the rise of shorter formats. Reducing its duration from five days to four is not a solution but a surrender—a capitulation to commercial interests and a misunderstanding of what makes Test cricket unique. 

The Wrong Prescription for the Wrong Problem

The justification for four-day Test matches often stems from the criticism that many matches fail to last the full five days. This critique, however, misdiagnoses the issue. The problem lies not in the length of the format but in the declining technique, temperament, and mental toughness of modern players. 

Test cricket was never intended to be a sprint; it is a marathon that demands resilience, adaptability, and strategy. Historically, matches lasted the full five days because players possessed the skills and the mindset to endure. Today, with many cricketers honing their craft in T20 leagues, their ability to handle the complexities of the longer format has diminished. 

Instead of reducing the duration of Test matches, cricket boards and governing bodies should focus on nurturing players who are better equipped to excel in this demanding format. Investment in coaching, infrastructure, and domestic competitions designed to prepare cricketers for Test-level challenges would yield more meaningful results than tinkering with the format itself. 

Test Cricket: More Than Just a Game

Test cricket is not merely a sporting contest; it is a cultural institution. Its five-day structure mirrors the ebb and flow of life, with moments of drama, attrition, and redemption. Reducing it to four days undermines its essence. The beauty of Test cricket lies in its rhythm—the way sessions build narratives, and matches evolve into epics that linger in memory. 

By compressing this narrative into four days, cricket risks losing the very qualities that set Test cricket apart from its shorter counterparts. It would cease to be a "Test" of endurance and strategy, becoming instead a glorified warm-up match. 

The Commercialization of Test Cricket

At the heart of this proposal lies the influence of commercial interests. Sponsors and broadcasters, driven by the pursuit of profit, see shorter matches as more marketable and cost-effective. While their role in promoting the game cannot be dismissed, Test cricket should not be shaped solely by their whims. 

Cricket, especially its purest format, must remain a sanctuary from the relentless pursuit of commercial gain. It is not a product to be packaged and sold but a tradition to be preserved. The intrusion of businessmen and their so-called "innovations" has already reshaped cricket in ways that prioritize entertainment over excellence. Test cricket, however, should remain untouched—a bastion for purists and an inspiration for the next generation of cricketers. 

A Call to the ICC

The ICC, as cricket’s governing body, must resist this proposal with conviction. Its role is not merely to regulate the game but to safeguard its spirit and legacy. By succumbing to the allure of four-day Tests, the ICC risks alienating the loyal fans who hold Test cricket closest to their hearts. 

If the ICC truly values the game’s heritage, it must prioritize the integrity of Test cricket over short-term gains. This means rejecting proposals that undermine the format and focusing instead on measures to revitalize it—such as creating better schedules, ensuring equitable revenue distribution, and fostering competitive balance among Test-playing nations. 

Preserve the Majesty of Test Cricket 

Test cricket is not for the casual observer; it demands patience, understanding, and a deep appreciation for the game’s intricacies. It is not a spectacle for the uninitiated but a masterpiece for the discerning. Attempts to dilute its essence by reducing its duration betray its rich history and enduring appeal. 

As cricket evolves, innovation is both necessary and welcome. However, not all changes are progressive. Some, like the proposal for four-day Tests, cross the line from innovation to irreverence. The ICC and cricket boards must tread carefully, for their decisions today will shape the game’s future. 

Cricket deserves better than a "circus show" designed to appease commercial interests. It deserves to remain a sport that values skill, strategy, and spirit. Test cricket, the pinnacle of this ethos, must be protected at all costs. The cricketing world must rally to ensure that this cherished format remains true to its name—a true "Test" of character, ability, and endurance. 

 Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Cricket’s Crossroads: A Tense Tug of Tradition and Modernity

 

In a rapidly transforming world, change has become both an inevitability and a challenge. Society’s constant evolution delivers a stream of surprises, some welcomed as progress and others grudgingly endured in the name of modernization or democratic values. Democracy, often celebrated for its virtues, can reveal cracks when misused. When the whims of a few overshadow the needs of the many, or when misguided interpretations of freedom dominate, democracy risks losing its way. 

This tension is not confined to politics; it permeates sports, where democratic ideals of fairness and inclusion shape decisions. However, when changes are adopted without discerning their long-term impact, the health of the game itself may suffer. Cricket, a sport of heritage and resilience, finds itself caught in this delicate balance. 

The Dilemma of Change

Cricket, perhaps more than any other sport, has demonstrated an ability to adapt while retaining its core essence. Yet, not all changes have enriched the game. The advent of Twenty20 (T20) leagues has revolutionized cricket, introducing unprecedented cash flow and global audiences. But this glitz has come at a cost, most notably to Test cricket, the game’s most storied and challenging format. 

Despite Test cricket's precarious position, proponents of T20 leagues persist in their acclaim. They argue that the format has modernized the sport, democratizing access and generating excitement. However, this celebration often overlooks the deeper implications. Test cricket, the format that truly tests a cricketer’s mettle, risks losing its best practitioners to the lure of franchise riches. 

The media-fueled frenzy around T20 leagues further complicates matters. The narrative often sidelines the voices that question this trend. Among the dissenters stands Mike Brearley, the former chairman of the MCC World Cricket Committee, whose warnings about cricket’s future demand attention. 

Brearley’s Call to Action

Brearley, reflecting on the game’s trajectory, has voiced grave concerns about the sustainability of international cricket. Using AB de Villiers’ absence from South Africa’s Test series against England as a case in point, Brearley highlighted a growing tension: the conflict between Test cricket and the shorter formats, as well as between international commitments and lucrative domestic leagues. 

Brearley’s argument is stark: Test cricket is in crisis. Domestic leagues like the IPL and the Big Bash are drawing players away from the longer format, particularly seasoned stars nearing the twilight of their careers. While financial security is a legitimate concern, the imbalance threatens to erode the sanctity of Test cricket. 

The Shakib Conundrum

Bangladesh's Shakib Al Hasan exemplifies this dilemma. A player of immense talent and a pivotal figure in Bangladesh’s cricketing success, Shakib recently requested a sabbatical from Test cricket, citing mental and physical fatigue. While the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) partially granted his request, his decision has sparked widespread debate. 

Shakib’s absence from the Test series against South Africa is a significant loss for Bangladesh, a team still striving for consistency in the longest format. While his workload as an all-rounder is undeniable, it pales in comparison to players like India’s Virat Kohli or England’s Ben Stokes, who embrace the relentless grind of international cricket. 

Shakib’s choice underscores a troubling trend: the preference for the shorter, more financially rewarding formats over Test cricket. Unlike stalwarts such as Sachin Tendulkar and Jacques Kallis, who thrived under pressure and relished the challenge of Test cricket, the modern cricketer seems increasingly inclined to prioritize self-preservation and franchise commitments. 

A Game at Risk

The larger question is whether cricket’s administrators are prepared to address these challenges. The rise of T20 leagues has undoubtedly enriched the game’s coffers, but at what cost? If Test cricket continues to be sidelined, the very foundation of cricket could crumble, leaving behind a spectacle devoid of substance. 

Brearley’s plea for a rethinking of cricket’s distribution model is timely. Boards must find ways to incentivize participation in Test cricket, ensuring that the format remains attractive both financially and professionally. Equally, players must recognize their role as custodians of the game. The glory of Test cricket lies not in immediate rewards but in its enduring legacy. 

Shaping the Future

The road ahead requires a delicate balance between tradition and innovation. While T20 leagues have their place, they should not eclipse Test cricket’s significance. For this to happen, cricket’s stakeholders must act decisively, prioritizing the health of the game over short-term gains. 

Shakib’s decision, like that of AB de Villiers before him, is a symptom of a deeper malaise. It is a wake-up call for the cricketing world to reassess its priorities. Without thoughtful intervention, cricket risks losing its soul, replaced by a shallow spectacle. The time to act is now, for the sake of the game’s integrity and its future.  

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

           

A Dream Forged in Adversity: Bangladesh’s Cricketing Journey

In the 1980s and 90s, cricket in Bangladesh was not just a sport—it was an unfulfilled dream, shrouded in scepticism and societal disregard. For the youth of that era, the desire to pursue cricket professionally was met with derision, often dismissed as an impractical folly. Parents, if they entertained the notion of sports as a career at all, leaned toward football—a game that, at least, held some local prestige. 

For cricket, there was no pathway to success. The absence of Test status loomed as an insurmountable barrier, rendering the sport a pastime rather than a profession. Visionaries like Gazi Ashraf Hossain Lipu, Yousuf Babu, Aminul Islam, Minhazul Abedin, and Akram Khan tried to ignite the flames of aspiration, yet their efforts often dissipated like the morning dew—momentary, fleeting, and overshadowed by the harsh realities of the time. 

A Nation Adrift 

In those years, Bangladesh was a footballing nation. Streets, fields, and hearts were dominated by the beautiful game. Cricket was relegated to an afterthought, its place on the national stage marginal at best. To dream of Bangladesh as a Test-playing nation felt like wishful thinking—impossible, unattainable. 

The road to Test cricket was clear, but it was also treacherous: Bangladesh had to make its mark in the ICC Trophy, a proving ground for aspiring nations. However, early performances in the tournament were disappointing, and the dream of playing alongside the likes of Australia, England, or India seemed ever distant. 

Personal Struggles and Quiet Defiance 

I remember those days vividly. In 1992, like many others my age, I played cricket in the narrow gullies of Dhaka. But every six hit or wicket taken came at a price—a torrent of scolding from family members who saw no future in the game. 

One evening, I returned home late after a spirited game, only to face a barrage of criticism. “Give up playing cricket! Bangladesh has no future in cricket,” they said, the words cutting like a blade. 

But I refused to accept this narrative. To my sister, I said with quiet conviction, “Things will change someday. Wasim, Waqar, Lara, and Tendulkar will come to play in Dhaka.”

Her response? A dismissive laugh and a single word: “Kochu!”(nonsense). 

The Turning Point 

Fast forward to March 15, 2017. Bangladesh stood on the cusp of playing their 100th Test match. From the margins of the cricketing world to the grandest stage of them all, the Tigers had clawed their way forward, defying odds, sceptics, and their own limitations. 

For those of us who lived through the days when Bangladesh cricket was an afterthought, this milestone was profoundly emotional. We bore witness to the transformation—from being a team that struggled to qualify for ICC tournaments to competing with the giants of the game. The journey was anything but easy. 

The Spirit of the Tigers 

The path to Test status was littered with obstacles, yet Bangladesh’s cricketers persevered. They won hearts with grit and resilience, enduring losses, learning from defeats, and slowly earning the respect of the cricketing world. 

Every victory, every milestone, and every individual performance carried the weight of a nation’s dreams. Aminul Islam’s century in Bangladesh’s inaugural Test against India, Habibul Bashar’s fearless batting, and Shakib Al Hasan’s rise as one of the finest all-rounders in the world** became symbols of what was possible. 

The scepticism of the past gave way to belief. The voices that once said, “Bangladesh has no future in cricket,” were drowned out by roars of celebration as the Tigers grew into a competitive, proud Test-playing nation. 

A Nation United 

On the day of the 100th Test, those who had endured the doubts and dismissals of the 80s and 90s felt a wave of vindication. It wasn’t just about cricket—it was about the spirit of a nation that refused to be written off. 

Bangladesh’s cricket history is not one of ease. It is a story of struggle, perseverance, and triumph against the odds. The Tigers’ journey from gully cricket to Test cricket mirrors the resilience of the nation itself—a testament to what can be achieved through hope, effort, and an unyielding belief in dreams. 

Long live Bangladesh. Long live the Tigers. 

Bangladesh Zindabad!

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Alastair Cook: The Burden of Leadership and the Echoes of 2012

Alastair Cook, England’s most prolific Test batsman, walked out to bat in Mumbai with an air of quiet determination. A few early strokes suggested composure, and his footwork against Ravindra Jadeja hinted at a revival of form. At the other end, debutant Keaton Jennings exuded fluency, and for a brief period, England’s opening pair seemed poised to weather the storm. Then, calamity struck. Attempting an uncharacteristic cross-batted shot against Jadeja, Cook was stumped—an aberration in judgment that encapsulated his recent struggles. Once again, Cook’s inability to convert a start into a significant innings fed the growing murmurs of discontent surrounding his form and captaincy.

This was not the Cook of four years ago, a man who had led England to an improbable triumph on Indian soil. That Cook had been a towering figure of resolve, dragging his team to success with a purple patch of batting and leadership that defied expectation. In contrast, the Cook of 2016 appears burdened by the weight of expectation, his form and decision-making faltering under the relentless scrutiny of a demanding tour.

2012: The Captain Who Conquered India

England’s 2012 tour of India had begun amid chaos. The retirement of Andrew Strauss had left a leadership void, while the Kevin Pietersen saga had fractured the dressing room. Defeat in a home series against South Africa had further dented confidence. Cook, newly appointed as captain, faced the unenviable task of leading a divided, demoralized side into one of the most challenging arenas in world cricket.

India’s squad was formidable, featuring stalwarts like Zaheer Khan and Harbhajan Singh, alongside the rising spin duo of Ravi Ashwin and Pragyan Ojha. On paper, England appeared outmatched, with even optimists predicting a rout on the turning tracks of Ahmedabad, Mumbai, and Kolkata. But Cook emerged as the anchor his team desperately needed. 

Despite losing the first Test in Ahmedabad, Cook’s defiant second-innings century infused belief into the English camp. The captain’s runs transformed his team’s mindset, demonstrating that survival—and even dominance—was possible on Indian tracks. England regrouped, outplaying India in Mumbai and Kolkata to seal an unexpected series victory. Cook’s runs, resilience, and leadership were central to England’s resurgence, marking one of the greatest achievements in modern English cricket.

2016: The Shadow of Former Glory

Fast forward to 2016, and the scenario is starkly different. England arrived in India on the back of a promising start to their winter campaign in Bangladesh, but Cook’s form has been patchy. While he showed glimpses of fluency in Rajkot, his subsequent failures in Vizag and Mohali have been glaring. This inconsistency has not only hurt England on the scoreboard but has also undermined his leadership.

Cook’s tactical decisions have mirrored his struggles with the bat. In Mohali, his defensive captaincy allowed India to recover from a precarious position on the first day. Opting for the new ball in conditions where the old one was proving difficult to score off, Cook handed the initiative back to the opposition. Similarly, his decision to introduce Zafar Ansari during a crucial passage of play in Vizag released the pressure on Virat Kohli and Cheteshwar Pujara, who built a match-defining partnership.

These errors, compounded by dropped catches, have further fueled criticism. In contrast, Kohli’s aggressive captaincy and sublime form have been pivotal for India. His tactical nous—such as employing short balls on spinning tracks—has kept England under relentless pressure. Kohli’s batting, too, has been a lesson in how a captain’s runs can galvanize a team, lifting their morale and instilling confidence.

What Cook Must Learn from Kohli—and Himself

Kohli’s approach offers valuable lessons. Aggression, intent, and faith in his players have enabled him to extract the best from his team. Cook, by contrast, has appeared hesitant, both in his shot selection and his on-field strategies. To reverse England’s fortunes, Cook must not only rediscover his batting form but also adopt a more proactive mindset as captain.

Crucially, Cook has a blueprint for success—his own performance from 2012. Then, his batting was the bedrock upon which England built their resurgence. He must summon that version of himself, providing stability at the top of the order while inspiring his teammates with a combination of runs and resolute leadership.

 The Road Ahead

Trailing 2-0, England’s task is herculean. But Test cricket’s allure lies in its capacity for dramatic turnarounds. Cook must lead from the front, rediscovering the mental fortitude and technical precision that defined him four years ago. His team, too, must rise to the occasion, channelling their captain’s determination to overcome a formidable Indian side.

Alastair Cook remains one of England’s finest, but his legacy as captain hinges on his ability to lift his team in the face of adversity. To script a memorable comeback, Cook must embrace the qualities that once made him indomitable: patience, resolve, and a refusal to be undone by pressure. The question is not whether Cook has the ability, but whether he has the will to summon it once more.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

  

Mehedi Hasan Miraz: A Rising Maestro in the Art of Spin

In the pantheon of cricket, moments of instant brilliance often mark the arrival of a prodigy. For Bangladesh, the advent of Mehedi Hasan Miraz in Test cricket is one such tale of inspiration. The 19-year-old’s first ball in Test cricket—a delivery that teased the surface, spun sharply, and landed with precision—was an emphatic announcement of his readiness for the grandest stage. By the close of the first day of the Chittagong Test against England, Miraz's exuberant smile reflected the culmination of years of promise and preparation. 

A Historic Debut

In his maiden outing, Miraz dismantled England’s top and middle order with an artistry seldom witnessed from one so young. Ben Duckett, Joe Root, Gary Ballance, Moeen Ali, Jonny Bairstow, and Stuart Broad succumbed to his guile as he etched his name into history as the youngest Bangladeshi to claim a five-wicket haul on debut. His hunger for wickets remained insatiable; in the second innings, he dismissed none other than the English captain, Alastair Cook, with a delivery of rare brilliance. 

Miraz’s magic was not confined to Chittagong. In the second Test at Mirpur, he once again tormented England’s top order, claiming six wickets in the first innings. These performances transcended mere statistics—they embodied a mastery of spin bowling that belied his years. 

The Craft of Deception

What makes Mehedi Hasan Miraz such a formidable force, particularly against England, lies in the subtle nuances of his bowling craft. At first glance, he appears to be an orthodox off-spinner, employing a round-arm action to deliver his arsenal. Yet beneath this apparent simplicity lies a nuanced understanding of grip, seam, and trajectory. 

Miraz employs a deceptive grip. While a conventional finger spinner spreads the first and second fingers on the seam, Miraz adjusts his hold so that the forefingers align along the seam. This sleight of hand tricks batsmen into anticipating conventional turn. Instead, the ball often deviates unexpectedly, creating opportunities for catches in the slip cordon or stumpings by the wicketkeeper. 

His wristwork is equally masterful. By subtly cocking his wrist—akin to turning a doorknob in the direction of spin—Miraz generates a downward rip that adds zip to his deliveries. Combined with his slightly bent elbow, his action engages the shoulder muscles to impart force and achieve sharp turn and bounce, even at pace. 

The Strategic Mind of a Young Assassin

At a tender age, Miraz has already displayed a precocious understanding of strategy. His mastery of length is pivotal—he reads conditions astutely, choosing spots that confound batsmen. In Chittagong, for instance, he baited Alastair Cook with an array of loose deliveries, allowing the seasoned opener to settle. Yet when the moment was ripe, Miraz unleashed a delivery of sublime precision that trapped Cook leg-before, a testament to his ability to set up and execute plans. 

What makes Miraz particularly dangerous is his willingness to experiment. Bowling from around the wicket, he conjures challenging angles, forcing batsmen to second-guess their footwork. Even when attacked, his positive mindset and resilience enable him to bounce back swiftly—a hallmark of a world-class bowler in the making. 

Countering the Smiling Assassin

Facing Miraz requires more than technical finesse; it demands mental fortitude. Batsmen must disrupt his rhythm, stepping down the track to smother spin or using nimble footwork to manipulate his length. Above all, reading his grip and deciphering the seam’s position are crucial to predicting the ball’s behaviour. Yet even these strategies are no guarantee of success against a bowler who thrives on adaptation. 

The Road Ahead

Miraz’s rise is far from a flash in the pan. His triumphs are rooted in natural talent, an insatiable appetite for improvement, and an ability to learn swiftly from experience. Beyond his technical prowess, his ever-present smile and buoyant spirit reflect a cricketer at peace with his craft yet hungry for greater heights. 

As the cricketing world watches, Mehedi Hasan Miraz stands poised to become a linchpin of Bangladesh’s bowling attack. His journey has just begun, but if his early exploits are any indication, the future of Bangladeshi spin is in capable—and magical—hands.  

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The True Test of Cricket: Bangladesh’s Struggle in the Purest Format

Test cricket—the very phrase carries an aura of endurance, skill, and relentless discipline. It isn’t merely a sport; it’s an art form that examines not just a team’s technique but its temperament, concentration, and character. Over five long days, teams are tested to their limits, often multiple times in a single session. This format is the cradle of greatness, where legends are born, and mediocrity is ruthlessly exposed. 

For Bangladesh, the journey in this hallowed arena has been fraught with challenges. Since being awarded Test status sixteen years ago, the Tigers have endured a tumultuous path. Unlike Zimbabwe, whose decline was largely shaped by internal discord, Bangladesh’s story is one of a slow struggle to meet the rigorous demands of the game’s longest format. Criticism has been a constant companion, yet despite the scepticism, they remain a part of the Test fraternity. On October 20, in Chittagong, Bangladesh is set to host England—one of the most formidable teams in world cricket—for a two-match Test series. 

A Tale of Two Formats

England, unsurprisingly, enters the series as overwhelming favourites. Their squad, brimming with seasoned professionals, is a stark contrast to Bangladesh's outfit. Yet, the interest in this contest stems from Bangladesh’s stellar performances in the shorter formats over the last year and a half. Since their breakthrough World Cup campaign in Australia and New Zealand, Bangladesh has emerged as a force in limited-overs cricket, their resurgence offering hope to other emerging cricketing nations. 

But herein lies the paradox: while their exploits in ODIs and T20s have been impressive, they do little to address the deficiencies in Test cricket. Success in the shorter formats, though rewarding, cannot mask the glaring gaps in a side’s ability to endure the rigours of five-day cricket. 

As the whites replace the coloured jerseys, Bangladesh finds itself stripped of its most dynamic pace options. Mashrafe Mortaza, Taskin Ahmed, and Rubel Hossain—bowlers who have thrived in the limited-overs arena—are either unavailable or unsuited to the demands of Test cricket. The absence of Mustafizur Rahman, sidelined by injury, further exacerbates the issue. 

Strength in Batting, Weakness in Bowling

A glance at the 14-man squad announced for the series reveals a familiar pattern. The top order, featuring stalwarts like Tamim Iqbal, Mushfiqur Rahim, and Shakib Al Hasan, inspires confidence. But as one reads further down the list, optimism gives way to concern. The bowling unit, conspicuously underpowered, remains the Achilles’ heel of this team. 

Shafiul Islam’s pedestrian medium pace, Taijul Islam’s struggling left-arm orthodox spin, and debutant Kamrul Islam Rabbi, whose first-class average of 40.89 hardly inspires fear, form the backbone of the attack. The burden on Shakib Al Hasan, Bangladesh’s talismanic all-rounder, is enormous. But expecting him to single-handedly take 20 wickets against a robust English batting lineup is unrealistic. 

The Defensive Mindset

Compounding the issue is Bangladesh’s defensive approach to Test cricket. Fielding teams with eight batters and three frontline bowlers has become a norm, the strategy centred on survival rather than victory. This mindset stymies growth, reducing Test matches to exercises in damage control rather than opportunities for competitive excellence. 

History has repeatedly shown that the most dominant Test sides—Australia in the late 1990s, and the West Indies in the 1980s—were built around formidable bowling attacks. A potent bowling unit, capable of consistently taking wickets, is the cornerstone of success in this format. Without it, no batting effort, however monumental, can secure victories. 

The ODI Conundrum

Ironically, Bangladesh’s rise in limited-overs cricket has, in some ways, hindered their Test progress. The spectacle of ODI and T20 success has overshadowed the grind of Test cricket, influencing young cricketers to prioritize the former. Role models like Taskin Ahmed and Rubel Hossain, whose skills are better suited to the shorter formats, further perpetuate this trend. 

Even within the cricketing establishment, there seems to be a tacit acceptance of mediocrity in Test cricket. The lack of investment in nurturing a versatile bowling attack reflects a shortsighted approach that prioritizes immediate results in ODIs and T20s over the long-term development of Test cricketers. 

The Road Ahead

As Bangladesh prepares to face England, the challenge is not just about competing with one of the best teams in the world but about redefining their approach to Test cricket. The English batting lineup, disciplined and relentless, will test the Tigers in ways they are rarely tested. Without a balanced and incisive bowling attack, Bangladesh’s strategy of relying heavily on batting depth is unlikely to succeed. 

Virat Kohli’s assertion that “a bowler wins you a Test match” rings particularly true for Bangladesh. Until their think tank places greater emphasis on nurturing quality bowlers and adopts a more positive approach to the format, their Test journey will remain an uphill struggle. 

Test cricket, after all, is a game of character—a format where teams earn their respect not by merely surviving but by fighting to win. For Bangladesh, the time has come to abandon defensive strategies, invest in their bowling, and embrace the true spirit of Test cricket. Only then can they hope to forge a legacy in the game’s most demanding format

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

First-Class Cricket: The Unsung Guardian of Test Cricket's Legacy

In the tapestry of cricket’s evolution, one constant has stood firm against the tides of change—first-class cricket. The game, once considered immutable, has undergone dramatic transformations over the past century. From the introduction of one-day internationals in the 1960s to the revolution of Twenty20 cricket in the early 2000s, cricket has adapted, thrived, and reinvented itself. Yet, amidst this whirlwind of innovation, the bedrock of the sport—first-class cricket—remains irreplaceable. 

Had Rev. Holmes, who in 1893 proclaimed that "there is no fresh ground to be explored" in cricket, lived to see the modern game, he might have eaten his words with the humility of a batsman who misreads a googly. Cricket’s evolution has been relentless, driven by both the lure of commercial success and the demands of an ever-changing audience. But as the allure of instant gratification grows, the value of patience, discipline, and technique nurtured in first-class cricket has become more critical than ever. 

The Rise of Instant Cricket: A Double-Edged Sword

The advent of limited-overs formats, particularly T20 cricket, has undoubtedly broadened cricket's appeal. The spectacle of big hits, flashing lights, and packed stadiums has captivated audiences globally, injecting unprecedented wealth into the game. For players, the financial rewards and fame of T20 leagues are irresistible, often overshadowing the less glamorous grind of first-class cricket. 

However, this surge in popularity has come at a cost. The prioritization of instant cricket has diminished the importance of the longer formats, particularly Test cricket, which demands a depth of skill and temperament that cannot be developed overnight. The rise of players selected for Tests based on their limited-overs exploits has further muddied the waters, leading to results that often expose the pitfalls of such an approach. 

The Case Studies: Hales, Maxwell, and Shahid

Consider Alex Hales, a prolific striker in limited-overs cricket. Hales’ ability to bludgeon bowlers in T20 and one-day matches earned him a Test cap as Alastair Cook’s opening partner. But as the colour of his kit changed, so did his fortunes. His struggles against the moving ball, inability to guard his off stump, and lack of footwork were glaring in Test cricket—deficiencies masked by the frenetic nature of shorter formats. 

Glenn Maxwell, another gifted hitter, exemplifies the same paradox. A maestro in T20 cricket, capable of inventive and audacious strokes, Maxwell's Test performances have been inconsistent, plagued by technical and mental lapses. His flamboyance, so effective in limited-overs games, often falters under the scrutiny of Test cricket’s probing discipline. 

In stark contrast is the story of Mohammad Shahid, a medium pacer from Bangladesh. Shahid’s relentless accuracy and ability to maintain pressure stem from his toil in domestic cricket’s unglamorous grind. His selection for Tests was based on first-class credentials rather than limited-overs performances, and his success against South Africa, where he tied down the batsmen and created opportunities for his team, vindicated that approach. 

The Essence of First-Class Cricket

First-class cricket is more than a proving ground; it is a crucible that forges the skills essential for success in Test cricket. The four-day format demands patience, resilience, and the ability to adapt. A batsman learns to leave deliveries outside off stump, build innings, and balance caution with aggression. A bowler learns to adjust his length, vary his pace, and sustain spells in adverse conditions. 

Unlike the adrenaline-driven environment of limited-overs cricket, first-class matches test the player’s temperament and fitness over extended periods. It instils habits that become second nature—adjusting to deteriorating pitches, handling reverse swing, and countering spin in its most potent form. 

This is why players like Damien Martyn, Matthew Hayden, and Justin Langer reached their zenith after years of toil in the Sheffield Shield. Even legends like Imran Khan and Rahul Dravid attribute their mastery to the lessons learned in first-class cricket. Imran’s transformation from an average pacer to a world-class fast bowler was forged in the rigorous demands of county cricket, while Dravid’s moniker “The Wall” was built on the foundation of discipline honed in domestic cricket. 

The Mirage of Instant Success 

The modern trend of selecting Test players based on limited-overs performances is a dangerous gamble. In T20 cricket, a mistimed shot or a misfield can go unnoticed amidst the chaos. In Tests, such lapses are magnified, often determining the outcome of a session, if not the match. Test cricket is unforgiving, exposing even the slightest technical or mental frailty. 

Exceptions like Virender Sehwag or AB de Villiers, who thrived across formats, are rare. Their brilliance is an anomaly, not a template. For most players, the path to Test success is paved through hard-earned lessons in first-class cricket. 

 The Road Ahead: Preserving the Backbone of Cricket

As cricket continues to evolve, the role of first-class cricket must not be diminished. It is the foundation upon which the sport’s most enduring format—Test cricket—is built. Without it, the game risks losing its soul, succumbing to the transient allure of instant gratification. 

Colin Powell’s words resonate deeply: “Excellence is not an exception; it is a prevailing attitude.”For cricket to sustain its excellence, it must continue to invest in first-class cricket, ensuring that it remains the breeding ground for legends. 

The game of glorious uncertainty does not need bits-and-pieces cricketers. It needs artists and artisans, players whose craft can withstand the scrutiny of time and the rigours of the longest format. For that, the value of first-class cricket must not just be remembered but celebrated.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The Slow Decline of Test Cricket: Weather Woes and T20’s Growing Influence

The recent scheduling of a Test series in the West Indies during July and August, the height of the Caribbean’s rainy season, was puzzling at best and irresponsible at worst. For someone like me, who grew up enjoying the Calypso Carnival of cricket between March and April, it felt like an unfortunate disruption of tradition. It wasn’t long before the obvious culprit emerged—scheduling priorities dictated by the Indian Premier League (IPL). The outcome was predictable: Test cricket was marred by rain interruptions, poor facilities, and a general sense of neglect.  

Rain saved the West Indies in one Test, while on another occasion, it washed away four days of play. But it wasn’t just the weather that was to blame—the poorly maintained Queen’s Park Oval in Trinidad played its part in the debacle. The sight of a sunlit outfield remaining unplayable due to inadequate drainage and outdated infrastructure was disgraceful. That such a historic venue, once synonymous with legendary moments, could fail to deliver even a full day’s play due to logistical issues was both ironic and tragic.  

Misplaced Priorities: T20 Over Test Cricket

This raises a troubling question: where does the responsibility lie? The West Indies Cricket Board (WICB) must account for the decay in Test cricket infrastructure. The success of the Caribbean Premier League (CPL) seems to be where their attention—and finances—are directed. With the CPL thriving as a commercial venture, the focus on nurturing and sustaining Test cricket appears to have diminished.  

Unfortunately, this shift reflects a broader malaise in cricket. Test cricket, with its deep-rooted traditions and strategic depth, has been slowly marginalized by the demands of Twenty20 leagues, which emphasize quick entertainment and revenue generation. The WICB’s apparent indifference to the plight of Test cricket in the region signals the erosion of a legacy that once commanded global respect.  

The greatest casualty of this neglect is not just West Indies cricket but the cricketing world at large. The slow decline of one of Test cricket’s most storied nations—whose fast bowlers once terrorized batsmen and whose batsmen were the epitome of flair—is a painful spectacle.  

Hurricane Season and the Folly of Scheduling

A closer look at the Caribbean weather patterns reveals the folly of hosting Test matches during July and August. According to regional weather data, July marks the beginning of the hurricane season, bringing heavy rains and storms to several parts of the Caribbean, including the Bahamas, Barbados, and St. Lucia. The chance of rain increases dramatically in August, making it the least favourable month for outdoor sports. A travel guide humorously described August as “Ugh,” reflecting its poor conditions for tourism—and by extension, cricket.  

Given this, the decision to stage an international Test series during these months was inexplicable. The predictable rain disruptions didn’t just frustrate fans but also undermined the credibility of West Indies cricket. Such poor planning reveals how the cricketing calendar is now dictated more by the IPL and other T20 leagues than by common sense. Had the Test series been scheduled during the traditional March-April window, the outcomes might have been very different.  

A Broader Problem: T20 Leagues and Test Cricket’s Marginalization

The story of Test cricket’s decline in the West Indies is not unique. Around the world, the growing influence of T20 leagues is reshaping the sport’s priorities. The balance between commercial interests and preserving the sport’s rich traditions is tipping precariously in favour of quick returns.  

Even elite cricketing nations like South Africa are not immune to this trend. A recent Test series in Durban revealed how far Test cricket has fallen in some quarters. Rain once again proved to be the villain, but what shocked fans was the state of the drainage facilities at Kingsmead, Durban’s premier cricket venue. Poor infrastructure meant that days of play were lost, even after the rain stopped—an embarrassment for a country with South Africa’s cricketing pedigree.  

For a team that has been among Test cricket’s elite, South Africa’s apparent indifference to maintaining world-class facilities signals a shift in priorities. Has South African cricket, too, decided to follow the West Indies’ path, placing more emphasis on T20 leagues at the expense of Test cricket? The worry is that, like the West Indies, they might soon find themselves reduced to a T20 powerhouse with little to offer in the longer formats.  

A Cry for Change: Restoring Balance

Test cricket, despite its slower pace and longer format, remains the soul of the sport. It demands skill, patience, and resilience—qualities that T20 cricket, with its emphasis on instant gratification, cannot replicate. While T20 leagues generate significant revenue, they should not come at the cost of Test cricket. If cricketing boards continue to prioritize commercial leagues over Test matches, the sport risks losing its identity.  

West Indies cricket offers a cautionary tale. Once the dominant force in world cricket, the team now struggles to compete consistently at the highest level, particularly in Tests. The erosion of cricket infrastructure, coupled with an overreliance on T20 leagues, has led to a slow but steady decline. South Africa risks following a similar trajectory unless urgent measures are taken to restore Test cricket to its rightful place.  

The administrators of world cricket must recognize that the game’s long-term health depends on the survival of all formats. Test cricket cannot thrive on tradition alone—it needs investment, better scheduling, and genuine commitment from boards and players alike. The allure of T20 leagues is undeniable, but cricket’s heritage is far too valuable to be sacrificed at the altar of short-term profits.  

A Call to Action

The rain-ruined series in the West Indies was more than just a scheduling mishap—it was a symptom of a deeper problem plaguing world cricket. The marginalization of Test cricket by T20 leagues is a troubling trend, and the failure of cricket boards to balance tradition with commerce is becoming increasingly apparent.  

If cricket is to preserve its soul, boards like the WICB and Cricket South Africa must rethink their priorities. Test cricket needs nurturing, not neglect. Facilities must improve, scheduling must be thoughtful, and the love for the longer format must be rekindled. Above all, the cricketing world must remember that Test cricket is not just a format—it is the game’s heartbeat. And without it, cricket risks losing what makes it truly great.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Spin’s Eternal Spell: Australia’s Struggles on Turning Tracks

Last year, Cricket Australia (CA) unveiled an ambitious project at the National Cricket Centre in Brisbane: a hybrid spin pitch designed to mimic subcontinental conditions. Located at Ray Lindwall Oval near Allan Border Field, this initiative aimed to address Australia's recurring nightmares against spin bowling on turning tracks. Coupled with the recruitment of spin maestro Muttiah Muralitharan, it was expected to bolster the Aussies’ technique and temperament against quality spin.

Yet, one year on, the project seems to have yielded little fruit. When the number-one Test side set foot in Sri Lanka, expectations ran high. They were the clear favourites against a young Sri Lankan team still smarting from a disastrous tour of England. But cricket’s enduring charm lies in its unpredictability, and after eight days of compelling cricket, it was Sri Lanka who emerged victorious with back-to-back wins.

This triumph was not born of rank-turners—the pitches at Pallekele and Galle were not the venomous minefields one might anticipate in Sri Lanka. Instead, they demanded application, discipline, and a refined technique. For Australia, those qualities were in short supply. Their batting against spin resembled an amateurish effort, riddled with technical flaws and mental lapses that belied their top billing.

The Art of Tackling Spin: A Lost Cause for Australia?

To succeed against spin, a batsman must play with the straightest of bats and an uncluttered mind. Whether driving with a high elbow or playing with soft hands, the golden rule is clear: play with the spin. Using the full face of the bat and keeping the ball on the ground are non-negotiable fundamentals. Yet, Australia's batsmen seemed to abandon these basics in favour of reckless strokes more suited to the Big Bash League than the cauldron of Test cricket.

The art of reading the spinner’s hand, the trajectory of the ball, and its movement off the pitch was all but absent. While fleeting moments of composure—marked by forward presses and watchful play—offered glimpses of capability, these were exceptions rather than the rule. Instead, Australia’s batsmen often lunged at deliveries or hung back indecisively, leaving them vulnerable to Sri Lanka’s trio of spinners—Rangana Herath, Lakshan Sandakan, and Dilruwan Perera.

Footwork: The Missing Link

The hallmark of effective batting against spin lies in purposeful footwork. Yet, Australia's batsmen appeared leaden-footed, their legs seemingly paralyzed by the sight of a turning ball. A still head, nimble feet, and the ability to rotate the strike are critical on pitches like Pallekele and Galle. But modern batsmanship, enamoured by the allure of power hitting, often overlooks these essentials. The Australians’ inability to adapt showcased not only a technical deficiency but also a deeper temperamental failure.

Strike Rotation: A Dying Art

On turning tracks, rotating the strike is as valuable as hitting boundaries. It disrupts a spinner’s rhythm, forces fielding adjustments, and alleviates pressure. Yet, Australia's batsmen, seemingly conditioned by the glamour of improvisation and big hits, neglected this critical aspect of the game. Their unwillingness to grind, spend time at the crease, and build partnerships highlighted a glaring lack of patience and game awareness.

A Tale of Two Sides

In stark contrast, Sri Lanka’s young side displayed grit and guile. Kusal Mendis, in particular, was a revelation, showcasing the resilience and technical acumen Australia so sorely lacked. Where the Australians faltered, Sri Lanka thrived—playing late, using soft hands, and adapting their strokes to the conditions.

The Path Forward

Australia’s woes on spin-friendly tracks are not new, but their repetition is troubling. The hybrid spin pitch at Brisbane and the expertise of Muralitharan may have been well-intentioned measures, but they cannot substitute for on-field application and mental fortitude. The Australians’ inability to learn from their mistakes in Pallekele and adjust for Galle is a stark reminder of the importance of adaptability in Test cricket.

If Australia hopes to avoid a 3-0 whitewash, they must return to basics. The path to redemption lies in embracing patience, improving footwork, and honing the mental resilience required to withstand the trials of subcontinental pitches. Without these adjustments, Australia’s struggles against spin will remain an enduring Achilles' heel, a painful reminder of their vulnerability on the global stage.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Edgbaston: A Lesson in Test Cricket's Ruthless Dynamics for Misbah and Pakistan

The beauty of Test cricket lies in its unpredictability. When two top-tier teams clash in pursuit of supremacy, the battle often becomes a captivating spectacle, a treasure trove for cricket purists. In an era dominated by the blitzkrieg of Twenty20 cricket, the engrossing contests of July and August reminded us why Test cricket endures, silencing those who prematurely declare it a dying art. 

The fourth Test between England and Pakistan at Edgbaston was a masterclass in the topsy-turvy nature of this format. For four-and-a-half days, Pakistan appeared in control, only for England to execute a dramatic turnaround, seizing an improbable victory. While credit is due to England’s resilience, Pakistan’s undoing was largely self-inflicted, stemming from tactical missteps, poor execution, and a lack of adaptability under pressure. 

Misbah's Misstep: Winning the Toss, Losing the Initiative

The great W.G. Grace once famously advised: "When you win the toss—bat. If in doubt, think about it, then bat. If you have very big doubts, consult a colleague—then bat." Misbah-ul-Haq, however, disregarded this sage wisdom. Choosing to field first on a true Edgbaston pitch—a surface ideal for batting—proved a pivotal error. 

While Misbah may have been influenced by past records (since 2005, teams batting first at Edgbaston had failed to win), such decisions must be grounded in the strengths and weaknesses of one’s team, not historical trends. Pakistan’s batting lineup, fragile and inconsistent, thrives better when defending totals rather than chasing them. By opting to field first, Misbah exposed his team to the unenviable task of batting last on a wearing pitch, ultimately resulting in their dramatic collapse. 

The Fragility of the Tail: Sarfaraz Left Alone

Starting day three at 257 for 3, Pakistan were well-placed to bat England out of the game. However, a sudden batting collapse, exacerbated by the tail’s inability to support Sarfaraz Ahmed, squandered this advantage. 

Sarfaraz, the lone warrior, displayed grit and composure, but the tailenders crumbled, adding just 143 runs for the last seven wickets. Historically, Pakistan's lower order has shown the ability to stretch leads in critical moments. At Edgbaston, however, they wilted under pressure, leaving Pakistan’s first-innings total insufficient to challenge an England side adept at bouncing back. 

The Absence of a Fifth Bowler: A Fatal Flaw

Pakistan’s four-man bowling attack, so effective at Lord’s, proved inadequate at Edgbaston. While Sohail Khan’s first-innings heroics offered a glimmer of hope, his fatigue in the second innings became glaringly evident. Similarly, Rahat Ali’s erratic line and length placed undue strain on Mohammad Amir and Yasir Shah, who bore the brunt of the workload. 

In contrast, England’s balanced attack highlighted the importance of a fifth bowling option. When Steven Finn and Moeen Ali struggled, Chris Woakes and James Anderson stepped up, ensuring relentless pressure. A competent all-rounder in Pakistan’s ranks could have provided much-needed support, but the lack of such a player—and the unwillingness to adapt strategies—left them vulnerable. 

Pragmatism Over Attack: Misbah’s Defensive Captaincy

In Test cricket, especially against a team like England, containment rarely yields success. Yet, on the fourth day, Misbah’s approach shifted from aggression to pragmatism. As Mohammad Amir and Yasir Shah applied pressure, Misbah chose to contain Moeen Ali and Jonny Bairstow rather than push for wickets. 

This defensive mindset allowed England to regain their composure and build momentum. Instead of setting attacking fields to exploit England’s vulnerabilities, Misbah’s defensive placements enabled Moeen and Bairstow to score freely. In the longest format, defensive tactics can backfire spectacularly, as they did here, allowing the opposition to dictate terms. 

Reverse Swing: Pakistan’s Kryptonite

Chasing 343 on the final day was always going to be a formidable task. Yet, after the early loss of Mohammad Hafeez, Azhar Ali and Sami Aslam offered a glimmer of hope with a resolute partnership. However, the old ball—and England’s mastery of reverse swing—proved decisive. 

Alastair Cook’s field placements provided a clear indication of England’s strategy, emphasizing middle and leg-stump lines. Despite this, Pakistan’s batsmen failed to adapt. Poor technique, over-ambitious strokes, and excessive shuffling across the crease played into England’s hands. Against reverse swing, maintaining a lower backlift, tracking the ball’s shine, and exercising caution are essential. Yet, Pakistan’s batsmen, seemingly unprepared, succumbed to the pressure. 

Lessons to Learn Ahead of The Oval

This defeat at Edgbaston serves as a stark reminder that success in Test cricket demands more than talent—it requires astute decision-making, tactical flexibility, and mental resilience. Misbah-ul-Haq, celebrated for his calm demeanour, must shed his pragmatic instincts in favour of a more proactive approach. 

Pakistan’s think-tank must address key issues: selecting a fifth bowler, shoring up the tail’s batting, and refining techniques to counter reverse swing. Above all, the team needs to develop a mindset that embraces aggression and seizes opportunities, rather than waiting for the opposition to falter. 

As they prepare for the final Test at The Oval, Pakistan have the chance to rectify their mistakes and showcase the fighting spirit that has long been synonymous with their cricket. For a team as mercurial as Pakistan, redemption is never out of reach—it merely requires the courage to evolve.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Pakistan's Redemption at Lord’s: A Tale of Collective Triumph

The 75th over on Day 4 at Lord’s saw a delivery that symbolized more than just a wicket. Mohammad Amir’s full, straight ball dismantled Jake Ball’s stumps, igniting a cascade of emotions among the Pakistani players. Joy erupted, hugs followed, and, in a poignant tribute to their armed forces, the team performed push-ups on the hallowed turf of Lord’s. This was not merely a celebration of a Test match victory; it was the culmination of a six-year journey of redemption, resilience, and resurgence. 

Pakistan’s last visit to England in 2010 left scars that cut deep. The spot-fixing scandal not only tarnished reputations but also cast a shadow over the very existence of cricket in Pakistan. Fast forward six years, and under the steady stewardship of Misbah-ul-Haq, this team has emerged from those dark times, finding its footing in the demanding arena of Test cricket. For Amir, the venue was poetic—Lord’s, which once bore witness to his nadir, now stood as the stage for his resurgence. 

A Bowling Renaissance

Pakistan’s fielding at Lord’s was lacklustre, and their batting oscillated between promise and collapse. Yet, as has been their hallmark, it was the bowling unit that proved decisive, carving out a victory that ended a 20-year drought at this historic ground. Traditionally, Pakistan’s bowling success has often hinged on individual brilliance. Legends like Imran Khan and Wasim Akram epitomized this trend, conjuring spells of devastation to singlehandedly alter the course of matches. 

This time, however, the script was different. The four-man pace attack operated as a cohesive unit, hunting in packs and complementing one another with precision and discipline. While pre-match anticipation centred on Amir’s much-anticipated return, the collective effort of the bowlers redefined the narrative. 

Amir, though struggling at times to find the right length in the second innings, remained a key component. His ability to set up batsmen created opportunities for his teammates. Rahat Ali emerged as the quiet assassin, operating under the radar of media-driven hype. His relentless accuracy with the new ball, coupled with raw energy, consistently troubled the English batsmen. He worked tirelessly, landing deliveries just outside off-stump with a sharp pace that demanded precision from the batters. 

Then there was Wahab Riaz, a bowler whose volatility often borders on brilliance. With the old ball, Wahab’s round-the-wicket spells were mesmerizing. His ability to swing the ball late and make it leave the batsman showcased the artistry of left-arm pace bowling. His spell during the gritty resistance of Jonny Bairstow and Chris Woakes was nothing short of a masterclass in sustained hostility, leaving fans enthralled by the sheer skill on display. 

At the heart of this bowling assault stood Yasir Shah, a leg-spinner who delivered far beyond the expectations of his supporting role. Yasir’s performance was a clinic in spin bowling, blending drift, turn, and subtle variations of pace to dismantle England’s batting order. With his flipper and googly, Yasir evoked memories of Shane Warne, his wicket tally elevating him to the status of a modern-day maestro. 

The Alchemy of Unity

What made this victory particularly special was its collective nature. Each bowler—Amir, Rahat, Wahab, and Yasir—played a vital role, ensuring no respite for the English batsmen. It was a seamless orchestra of pace and spin, where each performer contributed to the crescendo. This unity of purpose, often elusive in Pakistan’s cricketing history, was the cornerstone of their success. 

The Challenge of Consistency

As Pakistan looks ahead to the remainder of the series, this victory serves as both a beacon and a warning. Traditionally, Pakistan’s cricketing highs have been followed by inexplicable slumps. Consistency, more than brilliance, will be the key to building on this performance. The challenge lies in maintaining the intensity and discipline that defined their bowling at Lord’s. 

This triumph was more than a Test match win; it was a statement of resilience, a redemption arc for a team and a player who had been to the brink and back. At Lord’s, Pakistan exorcised the ghosts of 2010, proving that cricket is not just a game of skill but also of character. As they celebrated on the green canvas of cricket’s most iconic venue, it was evident that this was not merely a victory; it was a resurrection.  

 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Nation’s Fandom and the Forgotten Imperatives of Test Cricket

Bangladesh cricket finds itself in the throes of rhapsody, fueled by the meteoric rise of Mustafizur Rahman, affectionately known as “Fizz.” Fresh from his triumphant stint in the Indian Premier League, where he played a pivotal role in Sunrisers Hyderabad’s title win, Mustafizur returned home to a hero’s welcome. The reception bordered on the extravagant, with political leaders, media outlets, and fans vying for a piece of his glory. 

While the adulation for Mustafizur is understandable, the frenzy underscores a deeper issue—a tendency to latch onto short-lived euphoria while neglecting long-term priorities. Amid the celebrations, cricketing stakeholders must remember an essential truth: an overcooked biryani, no matter how promising, ultimately disappoints. 

The Bigger Picture: ICC’s Vision for Test Cricket

While Bangladesh immerses itself in Mustafizur mania, a significant development in cricket’s global structure looms on the horizon. ICC Chief Executive David Richardson recently proposed a transformative idea to revitalize Test cricket—a format many fear is losing its lustre in the modern era. 

Richardson’s plan envisions a two-division Test structure with promotion and relegation, mirroring the systems used in football. This change would not only provide a competitive framework but also address the disparity in the quality of matches, ensuring that every Test has context and consequence. 

“There’s a general realization now,” Richardson stated, “that if we’re going to keep Test cricket going well into the future, we can’t just say it’s going to survive on its own. Unless we give meaning to these series, interest in Test cricket will continue to waver.” 

The proposed system could expand to include up to 18 teams, offering opportunities for emerging cricketing nations like Ireland and Afghanistan to participate at the highest level. The structure would allow for promotion from Division 2 to Division 1 and even playoff matches, making the stakes higher for every contest. 

What This Means for Bangladesh

Richardson’s vision should be a wake-up call for Bangladesh. Despite having Test status since 2000, Bangladesh’s performance in the format has been largely underwhelming. Beyond occasional successes against Zimbabwe and a weakened West Indies, the Tigers have struggled to compete with the traditional powerhouses of Test cricket. 

In 2023, they secured draws against South Africa and India due to rain, not resilience. Matches against stronger opponents often end in humiliating defeats, highlighting the gap between Bangladesh and the elite Test-playing nations. If the two-division system is implemented, Bangladesh risks being relegated to Division 2, a scenario that would erase much of the progress they have achieved over the past two decades. 

This is a sobering prospect for a nation that fought hard to earn Test status. The dream of becoming a competitive Test-playing nation inspired a generation of Bangladeshi fans in the 80s and 90s. Losing that credibility would not only be a blow to the team’s morale but also to the nation’s cricketing identity. 

A Misplaced Focus

The Bangladesh cricketing ecosystem—its board, players, and media—seems increasingly enamoured with the shortest format of the game. T20 cricket dominates headlines, sponsorship deals, and fan engagement, relegating Test cricket to a distant afterthought. Yet, it is the Test format that has historically shaped the legacy of great cricketers and nations. 

Bangladesh’s media and cricketing authorities bear responsibility for this decline in Test priorities. Rather than celebrating every fleeting T20 triumph, they must channel their efforts into fostering a robust Test culture. Fans and players alike must recognize that cricket’s truest glory lies in the longest format, where patience, skill, and endurance are rewarded. 

The Road Ahead

To avoid relegation and restore pride in their Test performances, Bangladesh needs a cultural shift. The Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) must prioritize Test cricket in their development plans, investing in infrastructure, nurturing technically sound players, and hiring experts to improve the team’s strategic acumen. 

The media, too, has a vital role to play. Instead of indulging in jingoistic coverage of short-term successes, they must promote the value and nuances of Test cricket, inspiring the next generation to embrace the format. 

Lastly, fans must temper their fleeting infatuations with players like Mustafizur and recognize the broader challenges facing their team. A sustainable cricketing legacy requires more than fleeting adoration; it demands a commitment to the game’s purest form. 

Bangladesh has the potential to thrive as a Test-playing nation, but only if it heeds the lessons of history and responds to the warnings of the present. Otherwise, the nation may find itself relegated—not just in rankings, but in relevance.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar