Tigers Roar at Mirpur: A Triumph Over Ghosts of the Past

For over a decade, Bangladesh’s Test cricket journey has been punctuated by heartbreaks that have cast doubt on their mental fortitude. From the nail-biting loss in Multan in 2003 to the close calls at Fatullah in 2006 and Chittagong in 2008, the Tigers had often roared but failed to deliver the decisive blow. These narrow defeats against cricketing giants dented their confidence, casting shadows on their ability to sustain competitive intensity over a series. 

The script seemed ominously familiar in Chittagong in 2016, during the first Test of a two-match series against England. Dominating for large parts of the match, Bangladesh faltered at the crucial juncture. England’s narrow victory revisited old wounds, threatening to shatter the Tigers’ fragile self-belief. Yet, what unfolded next in Mirpur was a story of resilience, redemption, and resurgence. 

The Weight of History

Bangladesh’s Test legacy had long been a tale of unfulfilled potential. Despite possessing talent, the team often stumbled at the cusp of glory, leaving critics to question their temperament. While they had sporadic successes—primarily against Zimbabwe or a depleted West Indies—victories against elite opposition remained elusive. 

The loss at Chittagong could have been another nail in the coffin of Bangladesh’s Test aspirations. Instead, it became the crucible that forged a new chapter. Much of the credit for this transformation lies with Chandika Hathurusingha, the head coach who, like a master craftsman, understood the psyche of his players. Hathurusingha’s ability to shield his team from negativity and instill positivity proved crucial in the aftermath of Chittagong’s heartbreak. 

Mirpur: Redemption’s Stage

Entering the second Test at Mirpur, the Tigers faced immense pressure. Their shaky first innings, where nine wickets fell for just 49 runs, only deepened doubts. Tactical missteps, such as Mushfiqur Rahim’s passive captaincy and lapses in fielding, further compounded their woes. At one point, the specter of another agonizing defeat loomed large. 

But the complexion of the match shifted dramatically after Tea on Day 3. Chandika’s reputed dressing-room intervention lit a fire under the team. Mushfiqur, often criticized for defensive tactics, adopted an aggressive approach. Close-in fielders encircled the English batsmen like hawks, and Mushfiq’s decision to unleash Mehedi Hasan Miraz proved inspired. 

Miraz, the teenage prodigy who had already proven his mettle in Chittagong, struck immediately. His incisive bowling rattled the English middle order, while Shakib Al Hasan provided the perfect foil at the other end. What ensued was a spell of relentless pressure and precision. England, once cruising, crumbled under the weight of Bangladesh’s newfound ferocity. 

Victory Beyond the Scoreboard

The Mirpur triumph was historic—not just as a victory but as a statement of intent. For the first time, Bangladesh overcame their propensity to "snatch defeat from the jaws of victory." They buried the ghosts of Chittagong and established themselves as contenders capable of upsetting the game’s heavyweights. 

This victory meant more than levelling the series. It was a turning point for a team whose Test status had often been questioned. For years, critics had dismissed Bangladesh as a team incapable of matching the rigor and resilience demanded by the longest format. Mirpur provided a resounding rebuttal. 

Lessons and the Road Ahead

While the Mirpur win was monumental, it also underscored areas of improvement. The team’s struggles against reverse swing, the lack of consistency in batting, and questionable shot selection remain glaring weaknesses. Tactical lapses, such as ineffective use of pace bowlers and moments of indecision in leadership, further highlight the need for introspection. 

Yet, the victory also showcased the Tigers’ hunger and growth. Under Hathurusingha’s meticulous guidance, there is hope that these flaws will be addressed systematically. His emphasis on mental toughness and preparation could transform the Test side into a formidable force, capable of competing consistently against the best. 

A New Dawn for Bangladesh Cricket

Mirpur was not just a match; it was a moment—a declaration that the Tigers had arrived on the Test stage with intent and belief. It signified a break from the past, a shedding of the “nearly there” tag that had haunted them for years. 

While there remains a long road ahead, the Mirpur triumph provides a foundation of belief. If nurtured with the right balance of discipline, ambition, and introspection, the Tigers may soon find themselves not just playing against the big boys but standing tall among them. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Mehedi Hasan Miraz: A Rising Maestro in the Art of Spin

In the pantheon of cricket, moments of instant brilliance often mark the arrival of a prodigy. For Bangladesh, the advent of Mehedi Hasan Miraz in Test cricket is one such tale of inspiration. The 19-year-old’s first ball in Test cricket—a delivery that teased the surface, spun sharply, and landed with precision—was an emphatic announcement of his readiness for the grandest stage. By the close of the first day of the Chittagong Test against England, Miraz's exuberant smile reflected the culmination of years of promise and preparation. 

A Historic Debut

In his maiden outing, Miraz dismantled England’s top and middle order with an artistry seldom witnessed from one so young. Ben Duckett, Joe Root, Gary Ballance, Moeen Ali, Jonny Bairstow, and Stuart Broad succumbed to his guile as he etched his name into history as the youngest Bangladeshi to claim a five-wicket haul on debut. His hunger for wickets remained insatiable; in the second innings, he dismissed none other than the English captain, Alastair Cook, with a delivery of rare brilliance. 

Miraz’s magic was not confined to Chittagong. In the second Test at Mirpur, he once again tormented England’s top order, claiming six wickets in the first innings. These performances transcended mere statistics—they embodied a mastery of spin bowling that belied his years. 

The Craft of Deception

What makes Mehedi Hasan Miraz such a formidable force, particularly against England, lies in the subtle nuances of his bowling craft. At first glance, he appears to be an orthodox off-spinner, employing a round-arm action to deliver his arsenal. Yet beneath this apparent simplicity lies a nuanced understanding of grip, seam, and trajectory. 

Miraz employs a deceptive grip. While a conventional finger spinner spreads the first and second fingers on the seam, Miraz adjusts his hold so that the forefingers align along the seam. This sleight of hand tricks batsmen into anticipating conventional turn. Instead, the ball often deviates unexpectedly, creating opportunities for catches in the slip cordon or stumpings by the wicketkeeper. 

His wristwork is equally masterful. By subtly cocking his wrist—akin to turning a doorknob in the direction of spin—Miraz generates a downward rip that adds zip to his deliveries. Combined with his slightly bent elbow, his action engages the shoulder muscles to impart force and achieve sharp turn and bounce, even at pace. 

The Strategic Mind of a Young Assassin

At a tender age, Miraz has already displayed a precocious understanding of strategy. His mastery of length is pivotal—he reads conditions astutely, choosing spots that confound batsmen. In Chittagong, for instance, he baited Alastair Cook with an array of loose deliveries, allowing the seasoned opener to settle. Yet when the moment was ripe, Miraz unleashed a delivery of sublime precision that trapped Cook leg-before, a testament to his ability to set up and execute plans. 

What makes Miraz particularly dangerous is his willingness to experiment. Bowling from around the wicket, he conjures challenging angles, forcing batsmen to second-guess their footwork. Even when attacked, his positive mindset and resilience enable him to bounce back swiftly—a hallmark of a world-class bowler in the making. 

Countering the Smiling Assassin

Facing Miraz requires more than technical finesse; it demands mental fortitude. Batsmen must disrupt his rhythm, stepping down the track to smother spin or using nimble footwork to manipulate his length. Above all, reading his grip and deciphering the seam’s position are crucial to predicting the ball’s behaviour. Yet even these strategies are no guarantee of success against a bowler who thrives on adaptation. 

The Road Ahead

Miraz’s rise is far from a flash in the pan. His triumphs are rooted in natural talent, an insatiable appetite for improvement, and an ability to learn swiftly from experience. Beyond his technical prowess, his ever-present smile and buoyant spirit reflect a cricketer at peace with his craft yet hungry for greater heights. 

As the cricketing world watches, Mehedi Hasan Miraz stands poised to become a linchpin of Bangladesh’s bowling attack. His journey has just begun, but if his early exploits are any indication, the future of Bangladeshi spin is in capable—and magical—hands.  

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Day of Drama: Mirpur Witnesses Test Cricket at its Best

The first day of the Mirpur Test between Bangladesh and England unfolded like a gripping drama, blending joy, despair, and tactical brilliance into one riveting narrative. Thirteen wickets tumbled amidst rain interruptions, but even the elements couldn't overshadow the cricketing spectacle. It was a day where fortunes ebbed and flowed, leaving fans and players alike caught in a whirlwind of emotions. 

The Early Breakthroughs 

The morning began with Bangladesh's talismanic captain, Shakib Al Hasan, striking gold to rattle England's top order. His guile paved the way for young Mehedi Hasan, who continued his dream run, turning the English batting line-up into a house of cards. Alastair Cook’s typically stoic resistance ended with Mehedi’s artistry, while the beleaguered Gary Ballance departed cheaply, amplifying questions about his place in the side. 

Yet, England’s woes weren’t the day’s defining narrative. That honour belonged to Bangladesh’s own collapse — a sudden and spectacular implosion that transformed a position of strength into one of despair. 

A Tale of Two Sessions 

Bangladesh’s innings started with promise. Imrul Kayes fell early, but Tamim Iqbal, in imperious form, partnered with the ever-composed Mominul Haque to craft a 170-run partnership. Tamim’s fluent strokeplay, blending caution with aggression, evoked memories of his birthday century against England at the same venue years ago. Mominul, the perfect foil, anchored the innings with serene determination. 

Cook’s spinners struggled to break through in the first session, prompting him to turn to his pace battery as conditions began to favour seam and swing. And it was here that the match pivoted dramatically. 

Moeen Ali delivered the crucial breakthrough, dismissing Tamim, and from 171 for 1, Bangladesh crumbled to 220 all out. In a span of just eleven overs, five wickets fell, leaving the hosts stunned. The collapse was not just a testament to England’s bowling brilliance but also a stark reminder of the challenges of Test cricket’s toughest passages of play. 

The Anatomy of a Collapse 

1. England’s Masterful Bowling Tactics

Ben Stokes and Moeen Ali were the architects of Bangladesh’s demise, executing a near-perfect plan. Stokes, relentless and precise, exploited the overcast conditions to make the ball talk. He alternated between short-pitched deliveries and those back of a length, using reverse swing to deadly effect. His ability to extract movement both ways left the Bangladeshi batsmen groping in uncertainty. 

Moeen, on the other hand, found drift and turn at critical junctures, complementing Stokes’ hostility with subtle variations. Together, they dismantled the Bangladeshi batting lineup, claiming five wickets for 31 runs in a spell that will be remembered as the turning point of the day. 

2. Bangladesh’s Technical Deficiencies

The inability to counter reverse swing was glaring. Facing the old ball requires composure, technical precision, and an understanding of the nuances of swing. A batsman must identify the shine, adjust his stance, and delay his movement to play late. The Bangladeshi batsmen, however, appeared hurried and tentative, often playing down the wrong line or attempting ambitious strokes ill-suited to the situation. 

3. Tactical Setups and Mental Frailty

Stokes’ dismissal of Mahmudullah epitomized England’s strategic acumen. By repeatedly bowling outside off-stump, Stokes lured the batsman into a false sense of security. When Mahmudullah finally chased a wider delivery, the trap snapped shut, and England celebrated another crucial breakthrough. 

Such moments underscored a broader issue: Bangladesh’s mental fragility under pressure. In Test cricket, survival during tough periods requires resolve and grit — qualities that were conspicuously absent in this passage of play. 

A Broader Context 

Bangladesh’s struggles cannot be viewed in isolation. Their infrequent exposure to quality Test opposition has hindered their development in handling the game’s longer format. Regular encounters with high-calibre bowling attacks are essential for honing the skills needed to navigate challenging conditions. Without these opportunities, even gifted players like Shakib and Tamim find themselves at sea against the world’s best. 

Looking Ahead 

As day two dawns, both teams will reflect on the lessons of a dramatic opening day. For England, it’s a chance to consolidate their advantage and address lingering top-order frailties. For Bangladesh, it’s an opportunity to prove that the collapse was an aberration, not the norm, and to show that they belong at this level. 

Mirpur has already given us a taste of Test cricket at its unpredictable best — a blend of brilliance, blunders, and sheer drama. The stage is set for more.

 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Echoes of Multan and Fatullah at Chattogram: A Tale of Hope, Heartbreak, and Lessons Learned

As the fifth day at Chattogram dawned, Bangladesh stood just 33 runs away from history. Sabbir Rahman, the calm debutant, was entrusted with steering the ship home alongside the tail-enders. Ninety overs lay ahead—a lifetime in cricketing terms—for the Tigers to exorcise the ghosts of Multan and Fatullah. Yet, within 19 minutes, dreams crumbled, and the hopes of a nation sank in the Bay of Bengal. 

The heartbreak was palpable. Another defeat, another haunting memory to join the ranks of Bangladesh’s near-misses. But amidst the wreckage, there were undeniable positives. This was no meek surrender; it was a battle, a statement of intent against one of the world’s most formidable Test teams. Bangladesh proved their mettle, testing England’s nerves and skills in a way few expected. 

As the caravan moves to Mirpur for the second Test, the task before Bangladesh is clear: to build on Chattogram’s promise and ensure that their spirited performance doesn’t remain an isolated spark. 

A Need to Move On: Learning from Chattogram

History warns of complacency. After the heroics at Fatullah against Australia in 2006, Bangladesh wilted in the second Test. Similarly, the defiant stand by Tamim Iqbal and Imrul Kayes at Khulna last year was followed by a dismal collapse in the next match against Pakistan. Both times, focus faltered, and hunger waned. 

This time must be different. The Chattogram defeat should not become a weight that drags the team down but rather a springboard for growth. Captain Mushfiqur Rahim’s post-match words struck a chord: 

"We tried what we could. Nobody expected Bangladesh to play in this manner after 15 months. We showed our character to a side like England. It’s not frustrating; it’s a learning experience."

This perspective is essential. Bangladesh’s next challenge is not just to replicate the fight but to elevate their game, correcting the errors that proved costly. 

Tactical Adjustments for Mirpur

1. Sabbir Rahman: A Star Rises

Sabbir Rahman’s debut was nothing short of remarkable. His calm, composed innings belied his inexperience, showcasing a batsman of immense promise. Too often in Bangladesh, Sabbir has been pigeonholed as a flamboyant limited-overs player. Yet, his Chattogram performance revealed a batsman with refined technique, exquisite timing, and the maturity to play grounded, risk-free strokes. 

For Mirpur, Sabbir should be promoted to number five. Shakib Al Hasan, while an all-round genius, can thrive lower in the order as a finisher and counter-attacker at six or seven. Sabbir’s elevation would add stability to the middle order, allowing Mushfiqur and Shakib to play their natural games without undue pressure. 

2. Strengthening the All-Round Core

Mehedi Hasan’s emergence as a bowler of substance has added a new dimension to Bangladesh’s attack. However, his batting, though promising, isn’t yet reliable enough for the number eight position. To bolster the lower order, Bangladesh should consider an all-rounder like Soumya Sarkar or Mosaddek Hossain. 

Soumya’s ability to contribute with both bat and ball makes him an ideal fit at eight. His medium-pace bowling can offer crucial support in keeping one end tight, while his batting has the potential to provide the late-order resistance often needed in tight contests. 

3. A Singular Focus on Pace

Bangladesh’s pace-bowling cupboard remains sparse, necessitating careful resource management. At Chattogram, Kamrul Islam struggled to make an impact, his lack of aggression and belief starkly evident. Mirpur could be the stage for Subashis Roy, a bowler with a proven track record in domestic cricket and the hunger to seize his chance. 

Bangladesh might also consider fielding only one specialist pacer, with Soumya Sarkar serving as a part-time seamer. This would allow the team to focus on their spinners, who are better equipped to exploit Mirpur’s conditions. 

Devising a Plan for Ben Stokes

Ben Stokes was England’s heartbeat at Chattogram. His controlled aggression with the bat and reverse swing with the ball turned the tide in England’s favor on multiple occasions. Neutralizing him will be critical. 

With the bat, Stokes has shown vulnerability against full, quick deliveries aimed at the stumps. Shakib Al Hasan’s quicker ball in the first innings exposed this weakness, and Bangladesh must persist with this strategy. With the ball, Stokes thrives on exploiting gaps in defence. Sabbir Rahman’s approach of staying back and behind the line offers a blueprint for countering his reverse swing. 

Chattogram’s Legacy and the Road Ahead

The Chattogram Test was more than just a cricket match—it was a crucible of resilience, a showcase of talent, and a reminder of the beauty of Test cricket. It forced Bangladesh to confront their limitations but also revealed its potential. 

As they head to Mirpur, the challenge will be to channel the lessons learned, staying focused, hungry, and united. This is an opportunity to prove that the fight at Chattogram was not a fleeting glimpse of greatness but the beginning of a new chapter in Bangladesh’s Test journey. 

Mirpur awaits. The ghosts of Multan and Fatullah can finally be laid to rest—but only if the Tigers roar with the same intensity that captivated the world at Chattogram.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Chattogram Test: A Masterclass in Cricketing Drama

 The Chattogram Test between Bangladesh and England came to a dramatic conclusion on the 82nd over of the final day. Ben Stokes, England’s indefatigable allrounder, delivered a good-length ball that darted into Shafiul Islam after pitching. The ball struck Shafiul’s front pad, and the appeal that followed was as emphatic as the umpire’s raised finger. Kumar Dharmasena, who endured a torrid match with his decisions, adjudged Shafiul out, reasoning that he was not offering a shot. Bangladesh’s review was in vain, and so ended one of the most thrilling Test matches of the year. 

This match was a kaleidoscope of cricketing excellence: breathtaking all-round displays by two of the game’s premier allrounders, Ben Stokes and Shakib Al Hasan; the promise of two exceptional debutants, Sabbir Rahman and Mehedi Hasan; and a pitch that became the silent protagonist of an unforgettable cricketing tale. 

The Chattogram Pitch: A Silent Hero

In today’s cricket, the idea of a “good pitch” is often reduced to a batsman-friendly surface where runs flow freely, with bowlers left to toil in frustration. Such surfaces inflate batting averages but come at the cost of Test cricket’s essence: the battle between bat and ball. These sterile pitches frequently yield dull draws or lopsided contests, raising questions about the future of the game. 

Yet, history tells us a different story. The most enthralling Test matches have often been contested on pitches that challenged batters and empowered bowlers. The Chattogram deck was one such surface—far from the modern ideal, but a perfect canvas for the artistry of Test cricket. 

This pitch had everything: bounce for the new-ball bowlers, turn for the spinners, and just enough unpredictability to keep batters second-guessing. As the match progressed, the surface slowed down, but not excessively. It demanded skill, adaptability, and precise technique from the batters. Careless footwork or a misjudged stroke proved costly, while disciplined batting was richly rewarded. 

Unlike the proverbial minefields, this deck was balanced—it didn’t outright favour bowlers, nor did it allow for freewheeling stroke play. Instead, it demanded that batters play each ball on merit, employing late adjustments and flawless footwork. For bowlers, it offered just enough to make them an integral part of the narrative. 

A Test of Skills and Mental Fortitude

The pitch’s character infused the match with drama, pushing players to their limits. It reduced reckless shot-making, forcing batters to focus on composure and calculated shot selection. It tested their ability to leave deliveries, rotate strikes, and build partnerships—hallmarks of classical Test batting. 

Bangladeshi fans, who often delight in boundary-laden innings, found themselves cheering for subtler moments of cricketing mastery. Sabbir Rahman’s singles and twos, Mushfiqur Rahim’s patience in leaving deliveries, and Tamim Iqbal’s restraint with big shots drew applause. Similarly, the crowd was captivated by England’s ability to rotate strikes during Ben Stokes and Jonny Bairstow’s vital partnership in the third innings. 

This shift in perspective among fans highlights a broader lesson: Test cricket’s allure lies not only in flamboyant shots but in its nuanced battles. The Chattogram pitch underscored the value of patience, resilience, and strategic gameplay—qualities that elevate the format above its shorter counterparts. 

The Call for Sporting Pitches

The match rekindled a debate about the role of pitches in preserving Test cricket’s relevance. As Sachin Tendulkar aptly observed, “The wickets need to change; they need to be more helpful for bowlers. In T20s, the greatest of bowlers are being reverse-swept. Three hundred is no longer competitive in ODIs. So there should be at least one format where bowlers have a better chance of executing their skills.” 

Tendulkar’s words resonate deeply in an era where batting often dominates. A true contest between bat and ball is the lifeblood of cricket, and pitches like Chattogram’s are critical to restoring balance. A track that challenges both batters and bowlers creates a narrative filled with tension, unpredictability, and moments of brilliance—everything that Test cricket should aspire to be. 

Preserving Test Cricket’s Soul

The Chattogram Test was a reminder of why this format remains the pinnacle of cricket. The pitch, meticulously crafted by Bangladeshi curators, played a pivotal role in this epic encounter. Its balanced nature enriched the contest, forcing players to adapt and innovate while captivating spectators with its twists and turns. 

As Test cricket faces challenges from shorter formats, pitches like these must become the norm rather than the exception. They hold the key to ensuring that the oldest format of the game not only survives but thrives in an era of instant gratification. 

In the end, the Chattogram Test wasn’t just a match; it was a celebration of cricket’s purest form—a tale where the pitch itself was a co-author of history.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The True Test of Cricket: Bangladesh’s Struggle in the Purest Format

Test cricket—the very phrase carries an aura of endurance, skill, and relentless discipline. It isn’t merely a sport; it’s an art form that examines not just a team’s technique but its temperament, concentration, and character. Over five long days, teams are tested to their limits, often multiple times in a single session. This format is the cradle of greatness, where legends are born, and mediocrity is ruthlessly exposed. 

For Bangladesh, the journey in this hallowed arena has been fraught with challenges. Since being awarded Test status sixteen years ago, the Tigers have endured a tumultuous path. Unlike Zimbabwe, whose decline was largely shaped by internal discord, Bangladesh’s story is one of a slow struggle to meet the rigorous demands of the game’s longest format. Criticism has been a constant companion, yet despite the scepticism, they remain a part of the Test fraternity. On October 20, in Chittagong, Bangladesh is set to host England—one of the most formidable teams in world cricket—for a two-match Test series. 

A Tale of Two Formats

England, unsurprisingly, enters the series as overwhelming favourites. Their squad, brimming with seasoned professionals, is a stark contrast to Bangladesh's outfit. Yet, the interest in this contest stems from Bangladesh’s stellar performances in the shorter formats over the last year and a half. Since their breakthrough World Cup campaign in Australia and New Zealand, Bangladesh has emerged as a force in limited-overs cricket, their resurgence offering hope to other emerging cricketing nations. 

But herein lies the paradox: while their exploits in ODIs and T20s have been impressive, they do little to address the deficiencies in Test cricket. Success in the shorter formats, though rewarding, cannot mask the glaring gaps in a side’s ability to endure the rigours of five-day cricket. 

As the whites replace the coloured jerseys, Bangladesh finds itself stripped of its most dynamic pace options. Mashrafe Mortaza, Taskin Ahmed, and Rubel Hossain—bowlers who have thrived in the limited-overs arena—are either unavailable or unsuited to the demands of Test cricket. The absence of Mustafizur Rahman, sidelined by injury, further exacerbates the issue. 

Strength in Batting, Weakness in Bowling

A glance at the 14-man squad announced for the series reveals a familiar pattern. The top order, featuring stalwarts like Tamim Iqbal, Mushfiqur Rahim, and Shakib Al Hasan, inspires confidence. But as one reads further down the list, optimism gives way to concern. The bowling unit, conspicuously underpowered, remains the Achilles’ heel of this team. 

Shafiul Islam’s pedestrian medium pace, Taijul Islam’s struggling left-arm orthodox spin, and debutant Kamrul Islam Rabbi, whose first-class average of 40.89 hardly inspires fear, form the backbone of the attack. The burden on Shakib Al Hasan, Bangladesh’s talismanic all-rounder, is enormous. But expecting him to single-handedly take 20 wickets against a robust English batting lineup is unrealistic. 

The Defensive Mindset

Compounding the issue is Bangladesh’s defensive approach to Test cricket. Fielding teams with eight batters and three frontline bowlers has become a norm, the strategy centred on survival rather than victory. This mindset stymies growth, reducing Test matches to exercises in damage control rather than opportunities for competitive excellence. 

History has repeatedly shown that the most dominant Test sides—Australia in the late 1990s, and the West Indies in the 1980s—were built around formidable bowling attacks. A potent bowling unit, capable of consistently taking wickets, is the cornerstone of success in this format. Without it, no batting effort, however monumental, can secure victories. 

The ODI Conundrum

Ironically, Bangladesh’s rise in limited-overs cricket has, in some ways, hindered their Test progress. The spectacle of ODI and T20 success has overshadowed the grind of Test cricket, influencing young cricketers to prioritize the former. Role models like Taskin Ahmed and Rubel Hossain, whose skills are better suited to the shorter formats, further perpetuate this trend. 

Even within the cricketing establishment, there seems to be a tacit acceptance of mediocrity in Test cricket. The lack of investment in nurturing a versatile bowling attack reflects a shortsighted approach that prioritizes immediate results in ODIs and T20s over the long-term development of Test cricketers. 

The Road Ahead

As Bangladesh prepares to face England, the challenge is not just about competing with one of the best teams in the world but about redefining their approach to Test cricket. The English batting lineup, disciplined and relentless, will test the Tigers in ways they are rarely tested. Without a balanced and incisive bowling attack, Bangladesh’s strategy of relying heavily on batting depth is unlikely to succeed. 

Virat Kohli’s assertion that “a bowler wins you a Test match” rings particularly true for Bangladesh. Until their think tank places greater emphasis on nurturing quality bowlers and adopts a more positive approach to the format, their Test journey will remain an uphill struggle. 

Test cricket, after all, is a game of character—a format where teams earn their respect not by merely surviving but by fighting to win. For Bangladesh, the time has come to abandon defensive strategies, invest in their bowling, and embrace the true spirit of Test cricket. Only then can they hope to forge a legacy in the game’s most demanding format

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Tale of Strategy and Composure: England Triumphs Over Bangladesh in Chittagong

The third One-Day International (ODI) between Bangladesh and England in Chittagong carried the weight of anticipation and uncertainty. With the series delicately poised at 1-1 and heavy rains lashing the city for days, cricket fans braced themselves for potential disappointment. The weather threatened to overshadow what promised to be an enthralling decider, especially since England had declined to use the reserve day. Yet, fate smiled on the cricketing world as the rains ceased, and the toss unfolded amid roaring cheers, setting the stage for a battle of wits and skills. 

A Pivotal Toss and a Tactical Beginning

England's captain, Jos Buttler, demonstrated astute tactical awareness by opting to bowl first under overcast skies on a pitch offering bounce and carry. It was a decision rooted in pragmatism, as the track was expected to ease for batting as the game progressed. Bangladesh’s opening duo, Tamim Iqbal and Imrul Kayes, approached the innings with caution, adopting a traditional method of survival rather than capitalizing on the bounce. While their circumspection was understandable, it lacked the flair needed to seize the initiative against a disciplined English attack. 

Buttler’s foresight came into play as he exploited the subdued approach of Bangladesh’s openers. Ben Stokes’ clever cross-seam delivery to Kayes—paired with a fielder stationed strategically at short leg—proved to be the first masterstroke. Kayes’ misjudged flick epitomized how pressure can force errors, gifting England an early breakthrough. 

Tamim, on the other hand, found a rhythm and partnered with Sabbir Rahman to lift the scoring rate, unfurling a flurry of pugnacious strokes. However, England’s strategy was calculated: Buttler unleashed Adil Rashid, who baited Tamim with a loose delivery outside off. Tamim, in his aggressive intent, played a rash stroke and fell prey to the trap. The wicket highlighted England’s ability to outthink their opponents, even at the cost of conceding boundaries. 

The Middle Overs: Bangladesh Falters Under Pressure

Mahmudullah Riyad’s dismissal off a harmless long-hop underscored a frustrating trait of Bangladesh’s batting—impatience against mediocrity. Rashid’s ploy to serve occasional loose deliveries worked, as Bangladeshi batsmen repeatedly took the bait. Despite a brief revival by Sabbir and Mushfiqur Rahim, the innings lost momentum with the dismissal of Shakib Al Hasan, a pivotal moment engineered by England’s spinners. 

The latter stages saw Rahim rekindle his touch, anchoring the innings to a modest total. Yet, with only 249 runs on the board, Bangladesh found themselves 30-40 runs short on a track that demanded a stronger finish. 

England’s Clinical Chase

England’s response was a masterclass in composure and precision. Unlike Bangladesh, they prioritized strike rotation over flamboyance, ensuring the pressure of the required run rate never mounted. Ben Duckett emerged as the architect of the chase, showcasing technical prowess and an authoritative sweep shot that neutralized the Bangladeshi spinners. His ability to accumulate runs with deft placements was a testament to his maturity as a batsman. 

The hallmark of England’s approach lay in their temperament. Partnerships flourished even after dismissals, as incoming batsmen seamlessly adapted to the situation. The middle overs, often the Achilles’ heel for chasing sides, became a stage for England to solidify their grip on the game. They refrained from rash risks, opting instead for calculated aggression, a strategy that paid dividends as they eased to victory. 

Bangladesh’s Shortcomings: Lessons to Be Learned

Bangladesh’s performance, though spirited, revealed familiar flaws. Their spinners faltered by relying on turn rather than bowling a disciplined line and length. The inability to contain England’s singles and twos compounded their woes, with fielding lapses punctuating a lacklustre display. While Mashrafe Bin Mortaza’s late resurgence hinted at resilience, it was not enough to unsettle England’s determination. 

A Contest of Contrasts

The third ODI was a microcosm of contrasting philosophies. While England exuded professionalism and clarity of purpose, Bangladesh seemed to waver under pressure, undermining their potential. Buttler’s captaincy, bolstered by a collective effort from bowlers and batsmen, stood out as a template for modern limited-overs cricket. 

For Bangladesh, the match served as a reminder of the importance of adaptability and discipline, qualities they must hone to compete against the best. As the series concluded, it left fans with both moments of brilliance and lessons for the future—a testament to the enduring allure of cricket. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Mashrafe Mortaza: The Beacon of Resilience in Bangladesh Cricket

The aftermath of Bangladesh’s dramatic collapse in the first ODI against England left the cricketing fraternity in anguish. Despite being in a commanding position, the Tigers faltered under pressure, raising familiar questions about their ability to handle high-stakes moments against top-tier opponents. The blame was widespread, with even Mashrafe Mortaza’s reckless shot against Adil Rashid drawing scrutiny. 

For a team that has historically struggled to recover from such heartbreaks, the challenge was daunting. Yet, Bangladesh cricket is fortunate to have a leader in Mashrafe Mortaza—a figure whose resilience and determination have repeatedly lifted the team from despair. His leadership after the demoralizing first ODI was a case study in how to transform frustration into resolve and channel disappointment into action. 

The Turning Point: Mortaza’s Leadership

Mashrafe’s response to the defeat was not one of despair but of resolve. Aided by coach Chandika Hathurusingha, he worked tirelessly to rebuild the team’s morale, ensuring they didn’t crumble under the weight of self-doubt. 

Mashrafe understands the mental fragility of his team. He knows that such losses often breed hesitation and anxiety, qualities that can quickly spiral into a chain of defeats. It is in these moments that a leader’s presence becomes invaluable—not just for tactical guidance but for emotional fortitude. 

A Shaky Start in the Second ODI

On a Mirpur track offering bounce and movement, Jos Buttler’s decision to bowl first placed immediate pressure on Bangladesh’s batting lineup. The early dismissals of Tamim Iqbal, Sabbir Rahman, Mushfiqur Rahim, and Shakib Al Hasan left Bangladesh reeling at 113 for 5. Composure, not aggression, was needed, but the top order failed to adapt to the testing conditions. 

The team’s plight deepened further when the partnership between Mahmudullah Riyad and Mosaddek Hossain, which had momentarily steadied the ship, was broken. At 169 for 7, Bangladesh seemed destined for another below-par total. 

Mortaza: The Captain Who Wouldn’t Yield

Enter Mashrafe Mortaza, the captain who thrives in adversity. Joining Nasir Hossain at the crease, Mortaza faced the unenviable task of reviving an innings that was on life support. With just eight overs remaining, there was no time for cautious consolidation. Instead, Mortaza adopted an unorthodox approach, blending brute force with clever improvisation to rattle the English bowlers. 

His unconventional shot-making—sometimes awkward but always effective—forced England into tactical disarray. Fielders scrambled, bowlers hesitated, and a semblance of control slipped through their grasp. Mortaza’s dynamic innings of 44 off 29 balls, coupled with Nasir’s steady support, propelled Bangladesh to a respectable 238 for 8, a score that seemed improbable an hour earlier. 

The Bowler Who Made the Difference

But Mashrafe’s contribution wasn’t confined to his heroics with the bat. When it was time to defend the total, he took charge with the ball, delivering a spell that epitomized control, precision, and leadership. 

Opening the bowling with Shakib Al Hasan—a move born of tactical foresight—Mortaza struck early, dismissing three key English batsmen in his first spell. His variations in length and intelligent use of the conditions unsettled the visitors, leaving them struggling to build partnerships. 

When the tenth-wicket pair of Adil Rashid and Jake Ball threatened to replicate the first ODI’s late drama, Mortaza took it upon himself to end the resistance. His return to the attack brought immediate dividends, sealing a crucial victory and sparing Bangladesh another painful collapse. 

Leadership in Action

Mortaza’s captaincy was not just effective but inspired. His decision-making reflected a deep understanding of both his team’s strengths and the match situation. Recognizing Taskin Ahmed’s struggles and the absence of a frontline spinner, he crafted a bowling strategy that prioritized control and pressure. 

Alternating between pace and spin, Mortaza disrupted England’s rhythm, maintaining attacking fields that signaled his intent to take wickets rather than merely contain runs. His approach conveyed confidence—a trait his teammates absorbed and mirrored on the field. 

A Lesson in Resilience

Mashrafe Mortaza’s performance in the second ODI was more than just a display of individual brilliance; it was a testament to the transformative power of leadership. He wasn’t merely a player leading by example; he was a symbol of defiance, resilience, and belief. 

Through his actions, Mortaza reminded his team—and the cricketing world—that adversity can be a catalyst for greatness. His innings with the bat and his spell with the ball embodied the spirit of a leader who refuses to accept defeat, no matter how dire the circumstances. 

The Captain Bangladesh Needs

In a sport where mental fortitude often outweighs technical skill, Mashrafe Mortaza stands as a beacon of hope for Bangladesh cricket. His ability to inspire, his tactical acumen, and his unwavering belief in his team’s potential make him the leader Bangladesh needs during times of trial. 

The victory in the second ODI was not just a win on the scoreboard; it was a triumph of spirit and resolve. And at the heart of it all was Mortaza, a captain who, time and again, has shown the courage to rise above despair and lead his team into the light.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The Anatomy of a Collapse: Lessons from Mirpur

Four years ago, Bangladesh endured a heartbreak at the Asia Cup final, losing to Pakistan by a mere two runs in a low-scoring thriller. That memory still haunts Bangladeshi cricket fans, a painful reminder of how close they came to scripting history. Fast forward to their ODI clash against England in Mirpur, and it seems history found a way to repeat itself—not as a triumph, but as a tragedy. 

Despite visible progress in the past few years, Bangladesh’s Achilles’ heel remains: the inability to handle pressure in critical moments. This recurring shortfall was on full display on a warm evening in Dhaka when England clinched a dramatic victory in the first ODI, snatching it from the jaws of what seemed like certain defeat. 

The Build-Up: A Sporting Challenge

The Mirpur track was a well-balanced surface, offering assistance to both batsmen and bowlers. England’s innings was built on the backbone of a steady partnership between Ben Stokes and Ben Duckett, followed by a late assault from Jos Buttler. The visitors posted a challenging total of 309 for 8 in 50 overs—competitive, but far from unassailable on such a track. 

Bangladesh began their chase with cautious optimism. Steady progress marked the early overs, but England’s disciplined bowling and sharp fielding turned the tide, leaving the Tigers teetering at 153 for 4. However, Imrul Kayes and Shakib Al Hasan, two of Bangladesh’s most experienced players, forged a partnership that tilted the balance back in favour of the home side. 

With only 37 runs required from eight overs and six wickets in hand, the match seemed to be Bangladesh’s to lose. And lose they did, in the most inexplicable fashion, crumbling under the weight of their own insecurities to hand England an improbable victory. 

The Collapse: A Study in Pressure

Shakib’s dismissal in the 42nd over was the turning point, an event that sowed the seeds of doubt and panic in the Bangladeshi camp. What followed was a textbook collapse: six wickets fell for a paltry 17 runs, leaving fans and analysts alike questioning how such a favourable position could unravel so dramatically. 

Jake Ball and Adil Rashid were instrumental in England’s resurgence, varying their pace and exploiting the bounce to unsettle the lower-order batsmen. But more than England’s brilliance, it was Bangladesh’s mental fragility that scripted their downfall. 

The Role of Pressure

Rudi Webster’s observations in *Think Like a Champion* provide a lens through which this collapse can be analyzed. According to Webster, “You create most of your pressure by the way you evaluate the situations you face and assess your ability to handle them.” For Bangladesh, the pressure wasn’t just external—it was self-imposed, magnified by fear of failure and a history of capitulations in similar scenarios. 

When Shakib departed, the lower order seemed paralyzed by the thought of an English comeback. Instead of focusing on strike rotation and playing percentage cricket, they overthought the situation, allowing fear to cloud their judgment. In sport, pressure often amplifies the significance of the moment, and in this case, it reduced a composed chase to chaos. 

England’s Edge: Belief and Composure 

England, on the other hand, exemplified the art of handling pressure. Despite being on the back foot for most of Bangladesh’s chase, they never lost belief in their ability to turn the game around. Their bowlers rediscovered their rhythm, their fielders lifted their intensity, and their captain marshaled his resources with precision. 

That mental toughness, combined with tactical adaptability, was the decisive factor. England didn’t just outplay Bangladesh—they out-thought them. 

The Lessons: Moving Beyond Tragedy

For Bangladesh, the loss is a painful reminder of the importance of mental strength in high-stakes cricket. Physical skills and tactical planning can only take a team so far; it is composure under pressure that often separates victory from defeat. 

The Tigers must learn to view pressure not as a threat, but as an opportunity to excel. They need to trust their abilities, minimize overthinking, and execute their plans with clarity and confidence. 

As Rudi Webster aptly notes, “Your action is controlled by your mind and when you overthink about the negative outcomes, catastrophic outcomes are sure to come.” Bangladesh must internalize this wisdom if they are to avoid such collapses in the future. 

A Call to Resilience

The defeat at Mirpur is a harsh but necessary lesson for Bangladesh cricket. It is a reminder that while skill and talent lay the foundation for success, the true test lies in the mind. As the Tigers continue their journey, they must embrace the challenges of pressure-filled moments and rise above them, transforming tragedy into triumph. 

Only then will they write a new chapter in their cricketing history—one of resilience, composure, and victory.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Terror and Triumph: Why England Must Tour Bangladesh in 2016

July 1, 2016—a date etched in sorrow for Bangladesh. On the holiest night of Ramadan, the serenity of Dhaka was shattered by an unprecedented act of terror. Five assailants stormed the Holey Artisan Bakery in Gulshan, one of the city's most secure and affluent areas, taking hostages and unleashing violence that left the nation grief-stricken. In the aftermath of "Operation Thunderbolt," the standoff ended, but the scars it left on Bangladesh’s collective psyche lingered. 

Just days later, as Bangladesh gathered for Eid prayers at Sholakia, another bomb blast deepened the wounds of an already mourning nation. These events sent shockwaves throughout the world, with repercussions extending beyond immediate security concerns. For Bangladesh, a country with burgeoning ambitions in sports and tourism, the attacks threatened not only safety but also economic progress and national pride. 

A Nation on Edge 

The ripple effects of terrorism were immediate. Foreign investors hesitated, international tourists reconsidered their plans, and Bangladesh's growing reputation as a cricketing destination came under scrutiny. Only a year earlier, Australia had postponed their tour of Bangladesh, citing security concerns after the fatal shooting of an Italian charity worker in Dhaka. The Tigers, brimming with form and optimism, had looked forward to testing themselves against a historically strong side, but the cancellation left them without Test cricket for nearly a year. 

Now, England’s planned 2016 tour hung in the balance. A security delegation from the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) visited Dhaka, Chittagong, and Fatullah, inspecting venues, accommodations, and protocols. Despite reassurances from the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) and government, uncertainty lingered. Would the shadow of terrorism thwart the hopes of millions of Bangladeshi fans once more? 

Sport in the Face of Adversity 

Terrorism is not unique to Bangladesh. France hosted the UEFA Euro 2016 tournament just months after a series of devastating attacks in Paris. In 2008, England toured India despite the Mumbai terrorist attacks. Why, then, should Bangladesh be treated differently? 

As Mashrafe Mortaza, Bangladesh’s inspirational captain, poignantly remarked: “This kind of attack is happening all over the world. There were attacks in France, and still, the Euro was held there. I think it depends on ECB-BCB, what is going on between them. But I think they should come.”

Mashrafe’s words underscore a truth often overlooked: terrorism seeks to sow fear and disrupt life. Allowing such acts to dictate the course of international cricket would hand victory to those who seek to spread chaos. 

Bangladesh: Rising Above Adversity 

Bangladesh is no stranger to resilience. In recent years, the nation has hosted major international tournaments, including the ICC World T20 and the Asia Cup, with flawless security arrangements. These events showcased the country’s ability to ensure the safety of players and fans alike, dispelling doubts about its readiness to host high-stakes games. 

The government’s response to the Gulshan and Sholakia incidents has been decisive. Security measures have been bolstered across the nation, and life in Bangladesh continues with characteristic determination. Foreign investors remain engaged, and tourists, drawn by the country’s natural beauty and cultural richness, continue to visit. 

Cricket, the heartbeat of Bangladesh, has always been a unifying force. The sport transcends divisions and brings people together in ways few other things can. For a country like Bangladesh, where cricket is woven into the fabric of national identity, the game holds an even deeper significance. 

Why England Must Tour 

The stakes of the England tour extend beyond the boundary ropes. For Bangladesh, hosting England would signal a triumph over fear and an affirmation of its place on the global cricketing stage. For England, the tour represents an opportunity to honor the resilience of a nation and contribute to the unifying power of sport. 

Bangladesh is no longer the underdog that once struggled against cricket’s elite. The Tigers have roared onto the world stage, defeating giants like India, South Africa, and Pakistan in recent years. England would face a fiercely competitive side eager to prove its mettle in a bilateral series. 

The tour would also serve as a reminder of cricket’s unique ability to inspire and unite. Where politics often falters, sport succeeds, fostering connections and breaking barriers. In a world plagued by division, cricket can be a force for peace, demonstrating that life—and the game—goes on, even in the face of adversity. 

 A Defiant Answer to Terrorism 

If England tours Bangladesh, it would be a statement of solidarity and defiance against terrorism. It would signal that the world will not cower but instead stand united against those who seek to disrupt peace. The sight of cricket flourishing in Dhaka and Chittagong would not only uplift Bangladeshi spirits but also reinforce the sport’s role as a symbol of hope and resilience. 

As Mashrafe aptly put it, “The sport should continue.” For Bangladesh, for cricket, and for the world, England’s tour would be more than a series of matches—it would be a victory for the human spirit.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The Unsung Hero: Imrul Kayes and The Silent Symphony of Bangladesh’s Top Order

In cricket, a few batsmen stand out as ruthless marauders, born with an innate ability to dismantle bowling attacks. Players like Virender Sehwag, Sachin Tendulkar, Tillakaratne Dilshan, and Tamim Iqbal captivate fans with their sheer audacity. When these dashers are on the crease, they demand the spotlight, reducing the role of their batting partners to mere spectators. Yet, cricket is rarely a one-man show. At the other end of the pitch stands the unsung hero—steady, composed, and silently vital—whose role in anchoring the innings goes unnoticed but remains indispensable. For Bangladesh, that steady presence for many years has been Imrul Kayes.

The Enigma of Tamim Iqbal’s Explosive Brilliance

Tamim Iqbal, Bangladesh’s dashing opener, embodies a brand of cricket that sends adrenaline coursing through crowds. When his bat starts blazing, stadiums erupt with euphoria, craving every boundary with growing hunger. But with Tamim, the ecstasy is often short-lived. His dismissal casts an eerie silence over the ground, shifting the pressure squarely onto the shoulders of his teammates. Over the years, Bangladesh’s middle order has wavered under such pressure, often crumbling after Tamim’s exit. 

While Tamim’s brilliance can be exhilarating, his flamboyance comes with risks. He is not a batsman built to carry the innings to the end in the traditional sense. His game is about momentum, not longevity. Bangladesh, therefore, needed an opener with the temperament to build innings brick by brick—a stabilizing force who could hold one end, maintain composure, and rotate the strike without surrendering to the chaos. That steady hand would arrive in the form of Imrul Kayes.

A Rocky Start and a Turning Point

Kayes’s early career was far from impressive. After making his first-class debut in 2006, his initial years at the international level were riddled with inconsistency. He struggled in his Test debut against South Africa in 2008, scoring just 10 and 4 in two innings. His introduction to One-Day Internationals (ODIs) wasn’t much better, managing only 12 runs in his first outing against New Zealand. His batting in those formative years was frustrating—erratic, riddled with lapses in concentration, and lacking the patience required to construct meaningful innings. 

However, the year 2010 marked a turning point in Kayes’s career. On Bangladesh’s tour to New Zealand, he emerged as a different player—confident, focused, and deliberate. In that breakthrough year, Kayes amassed 867 runs in ODIs, finishing as the fifth-highest run-scorer of the year. His maiden ODI century came against New Zealand, a symbol of his newfound resilience and composure. From that moment, he began to redefine his role—not as a flashy crowd-pleaser but as a dependable innings-builder.

The Yin to Tamim’s Yang

Tamim and Kayes complement each other in a way that balances Bangladesh’s batting dynamics. Where Tamim dazzles with boundaries, Kayes anchors the innings with singles and well-placed twos. If Tamim is the lightning bolt that strikes fear into the bowlers, Kayes is the steady drizzle that quietly chips away at their resolve. His ability to rotate the strike, pick gaps in tight field settings, and keep the scoreboard ticking gives Bangladesh much-needed stability at the top of the order.

Though overshadowed by the explosive brilliance of “Boom-Boom” Tamim, Kayes's presence brings a calming effect to the innings. His game is built on patience rather than spectacle, endurance over extravagance. He has a knack for placing the ball into gaps with precision, reminiscent of Bangladesh’s batting pioneer, Aminul Islam. Over time, his appetite for runs has grown, and his knack for pacing an innings has earned him consecutive man-of-the-match awards—proof of his growing stature in the side.

The Redemption Arc: From Frustration to Mr. Dependable

For many years, Bangladesh’s top order suffered from instability. The absence of Shahriar Nafees, the country’s most elegant timer of the ball, left a gaping hole after his sudden exile from international cricket in 2008. Kayes was thrust into the spotlight, and though his initial performances were underwhelming, his transformation over time has been remarkable. By 2010, he had evolved into the dependable opener Bangladesh had long craved—someone who could drop anchor, absorb pressure and keep the innings afloat when the aggressive stroke-makers faltered.

Kayes’s value lies not only in his technical ability but also in his temperament. He puts a price on his wicket, rarely gifting it away as he once did. In an era where Bangladesh often relied on the brilliance of Tamim or the all-round genius of Shakib Al Hasan to win matches, Kayes emerged as the steady heartbeat of the batting order—quietly effective, relentlessly determined, and utterly reliable.

A Name Carved in Shadows

While Tamim Iqbal may continue to dominate headlines with his boundary-strewn innings, Imrul Kayes’s role in Bangladesh’s cricketing narrative is equally significant. Cricket, after all, is not only about fireworks but also about those who keep the flame burning through quiet, patient toil. Kayes’s contribution at the top of the order ensures that the flamboyance of others is not wasted.

As Bangladesh moves forward, the importance of having a player like Kayes—someone who thrives in the shadows—cannot be overstated. He is no longer just Tamim’s silent partner but a batsman who has etched his own name into the annals of Bangladesh cricket. The crowd may not erupt in applause for every single or two he scampers, but his innings serve as the foundation upon which greater victories are built. And in the end, every team needs a Kayes—an unsung hero who ensures the show goes on.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Heroism in Chittagong: How Mahmudullah and Shafiul Islam Rescued Bangladesh from the Abyss

Bangladesh cricket has often lived on the edge of heartbreak. The team’s penchant for batting collapses, especially under pressure, has become a frustrating pattern. When faced with adversity, cool heads tend to desert them, and the absence of a reliable finisher has haunted the side repeatedly. Against England in Chittagong, this familiar tale threatened to unravel again - only this time, two unlikely heroes emerged to rewrite the script and etch their names into Bangladesh’s cricketing folklore.

Another Collapse, Another Familiar Tale?

Bangladesh seemed to have built a stable foundation at 155 for 3, only for the innings to unravel spectacularly. Within minutes, the team slumped to 169 for 8, a collapse both brutal and all too familiar. The stadium, once throbbing with hope and excitement, emptied quickly, fans abandoning their seats in silent resignation. With 58 runs still required and only two wickets left, it looked like yet another chapter in Bangladesh’s saga of missed opportunities and failed chases.

The English bowlers smelled blood. Their deliveries were full of intent, brimming with energy, as they tore into the Bangladeshi lower order. Against this onslaught stood two cricketers: Mahmudullah Riyad - a composed yet uncelebrated figure in the middle order -  and Shafiul Islam, a tailender with no reputation to suggest he belonged on this stage. 

What followed was nothing short of extraordinary.

 Shafiul Islam: A Tailender Unleashed

The 42nd over became the turning point - not through textbook cricket but through sheer audacity. With Graeme Swann at the crease, few expected fireworks. But Shafiul Islam had other ideas. He wound up and hammered Swann’s fourth delivery over cover for four, a shot that dripped with an unexpected confidence. If that was a statement, the next ball was a declaration: Shafiul leaned back, swung hard, and dispatched Swann high over long-on for six. 

In that moment, the timid tailender transformed into a fearless striker. His eyes sparkled with intent, and his body language radiated defiance. Was this the same slender, quiet Shafiul? His bold stroke play was reminiscent of Mashrafe Mortaza on one of his more inspired days. The English bowlers, who had expected the tail to fold, suddenly found themselves facing a rejuvenated opponent. 

Shafiul’s burst of runs did more than just alter the scoreboard - it shattered England’s composure. It gave Bangladesh a foothold where none seemed possible, but the real architect of this remarkable recovery was the man at the other end: Mahmudullah Riyad. 

Mahmudullah Riyad: The Calm in the Chaos

If Shafiul’s aggression rattled England, it was Riyad’s unflinching composure that ensured Bangladesh stayed in the contest. Mahmudullah’s batting was a masterclass in situational awareness. He didn’t just block recklessly or succumb to pressure — he calculated every stroke, nudging singles and twos into gaps, never allowing England’s packed field to smother him. His boundaries were precise and deliberate, arriving only when the moment demanded them. There was no room for rashness or panic in Riad’s approach. 

While his teammates crumbled under pressure earlier in the innings, Riad embodied the qualities Bangladesh has long sought but rarely found in a middle-order batsman: patience, calm, and strategic brilliance. His temperament evoked memories of Michael Bevan and Mike Hussey - two legends renowned for steering their teams through the trickiest situations. Like them, Riyad possessed the ability to rotate strike effortlessly, offering his batting partner both support and confidence.

His quiet determination at the crease ensured that Shafiul’s adventurous strokes weren’t in vain. It was Riad’s reassuring presence that shielded the inexperienced tailender from undue pressure, giving him the freedom to attack. 

The Art of Finishing: Riyad’s Essential Role for Bangladesh

For a team that has long struggled with inconsistency, particularly in the middle order, Mahmudullah’s innings was a revelation. Bangladesh has often been guilty of leaving chases unfinished - undone by impulsive stroke-making and mental lapses. Riyad’s performance against England offered a glimpse of what the team could achieve with a dependable finisher at the helm. 

The question many fans asked in frustration after the India game - why was Riyad not utilized more often in key situations?  - Now found an answer. In Mahmudullah, Bangladesh has discovered a rare gem: a cricketer with the temperament to guide his team through turbulent waters and the skill to deliver under pressure. His absence from crucial moments in recent games left many wondering if the team was squandering a vital asset. 

 A Sting in the Tail: Shafiul’s Role in the Rescue Act

While Riyad provided the anchor, Shafiul’s contribution was no less significant. His fearless stroke play and refusal to buckle under pressure offered a glimpse into the hidden depths of Bangladesh’s tail. Though his reputation as a batsman was nonexistent, Shafiul’s heroics showed that sometimes courage and self-belief can outmatch even the most polished techniques. 

In a game that was slipping out of their grasp, it was these two unlikely heroes - one a cool-headed middle-order mainstay, the other a defiant tailender - who scripted a comeback for the ages. Their partnership didn’t just rescue Bangladesh from defeat; it embodied the "never-say-die" spirit that fans long to see in their team. 

 A Chapter for the Ages

When the final runs were scored and Bangladesh secured an unforgettable victory, the narrative had shifted. The familiar tale of collapse was replaced by one of resilience and redemption. Had it not been for Riyad’s calming influence and Shafiul’s fearless onslaught, the team would have fallen prey to criticism from pundits and the unforgiving ire of fans. Navjot Singh Sidhu’s taunts would have been relentless, and social media would have erupted in scorn from disappointed supporters. 

Instead, the victory at Chittagong became a story of heroes who defied expectations. For once, Bangladesh’s batting was not about what went wrong but about two individuals who did everything right. Mahmudullah Riyad emerged as the finisher Bangladesh had long sought, and Shafiul Islam provided a sting in the tail that no one saw coming. 

Together, they etched their names in the annals of Bangladesh cricket, turning what could have been yet another collapse into a shining example of courage and composure. Their partnership wasn’t just a victory for Bangladesh on the field - it was a promise of what the team could achieve with heart, grit, and belief.

 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar