Bangladesh Cricket: Constructive Steps need to be Fulfilled by BCB

Bangladesh endured their second consecutive crushing defeat, with the first Test extending to the final day and the second succumbing within just two and a half days. On the third day, the visitors capitulated meekly, failing to last long on a pitch that was flat and highly conducive to batting. In both matches, the track remained largely unremarkable, but Bangladesh's batting and bowling exhibited fundamental flaws. Technically and temperamentally, the team appeared disjointed, leaving little to critique other than their own deficiencies—both in their application at the crease and in their inability to adapt to conditions that did not favor the opposition.

South Africa’s bowling attack, though not at full strength, did not present any particularly menacing challenges. The first Test saw them lacking firepower, while in the second, they operated with a depleted unit. Despite the absence of blistering pace or consistent short-pitched tactics to exploit the ribcage area, Bangladesh’s top and middle orders crumbled under relatively straightforward conditions. South African pacers, without delivering deceptive pace or attacking relentlessly, still found significant success.

Kagiso Rabada, in his post-day-two press conference, pointedly remarked, "About the Bangladeshi batsmen, I don’t know what happened. We just stuck to our plan and at the end of the day they got themselves out." This candid statement highlighted the stark lack of application and resolve among the Bangladeshi batsmen, underscoring a worrying pattern of self-destruction rather than any significant challenge posed by the opposition.

In a devastating collapse, Bangladesh was dismissed for 172 on the third day, following their meager total of 147 in the first innings. This marked their heaviest defeat to South Africa in Test cricket. It is imperative, however, not to hastily dismiss this result as an anomaly. There are critical lessons to be learned, both in technique and temperament, if the team is to rise from this setback and avoid further humiliation in the future.

 

Rethink about Mushfiqur Rahim’s Captaincy

This is not the first instance where Mushfiqur Rahim’s cautious approach has undermined Bangladesh's progress. While his defensive mindset has occasionally served the team, his emotional outbursts—often erratic and ill-timed—have become a source of ridicule in the global cricketing community. A Test captain must be a figure of authority, possessing not only a strong personality but also an innate sense of confidence and a proactive, attacking mindset. Unfortunately, despite over a decade of international cricket and five years at the helm of the national side, Mushfiq remains emotionally fragile and overly pragmatic in his leadership.

His ill-advised decision at the toss in the second Test was so baffling that it even left Faf du Plessis, the South African captain, astounded and prompted him to mock Mushfiq's choice. On the field, Mushfiq seemed uncertain, his leadership lacking clarity, and his batting—once seen as a strength—failed to inspire the team. He has yet to demonstrate growth, consistently repeating mistakes without the ability to learn or evolve from them.

It is time for the Bangladesh cricket fraternity to reconsider Mushfiq's role as Test captain. The team requires a leader who is not only resolute and emotionally stable but also bold and attacking in approach. At this juncture, it is clear that Tamim Iqbal might be the more fitting candidate to guide Bangladesh in Test cricket, offering the calm, confident, and decisive leadership that the team so desperately needs.

Imrul Kayes and Soumya Sarkar Need Break

Imrul Kayes repeatedly expressed his desire to open the batting, a wish that was eventually granted during Bangladesh's tour of South Africa. Unfortunately, he was unable to capitalize on this opportunity. His dismissals were disappointing, marked by soft shots that reflected a lack of mental fortitude. On the other hand, Soumya Sarkar, a player I had placed considerable faith in, proved to be a greater frustration. I had hoped he would address the technical shortcomings that had previously plagued him, but instead, he continued to fall victim to basic errors. His inability to manage an angled bat outside the off stump against pace bowlers—something that should be second nature at this level—raises serious concerns. If Soumya cannot rectify these fundamental flaws, it might be time for him to step away from Test cricket for a while, to reassess and refine his game. Similarly, Kayes also needs a break to rediscover his form and confidence.

With both of these players struggling, Bangladesh now faces the pressing challenge of identifying a reliable opening partner for Tamim Iqbal in Test cricket. While some local sports journalists and fans have persistently called for the return of Shahriar Nafees, the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) should resist such short-sighted clamouring. Instead, they should look to the future, focusing on the promising talent emerging from the Under-19 team, which performed admirably last year. Additionally, several young players have been making waves in domestic cricket, showing potential that cannot be ignored. Batsmen like Saif Hasan, Yasir Ali, Zakir Hasan, and others are demonstrating the kind of skill and consistency that could make them worthy candidates for the opening position alongside Tamim. It's time for the BCB to place their trust in these emerging talents, who can make a lasting impact on the national team.

Is the Batting Coach Good Enough?

 The Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) expressed dissatisfaction with the performance of the previous batting coach, Thilan Samaraweera, ultimately opting not to extend his contract. However, the replacement they appointed has not demonstrated any superior credentials. His first-class career was modest at best, and his exposure to international cricket was minimal. Furthermore, his previous stint as a batting consultant yielded little in terms of measurable success. To make matters more perplexing, Akram Khan, one of the key figures within the BCB, revealed that the new coach was appointed to focus on the lower middle and lower-order batsmen—a statement that raised eyebrows, given the need for a comprehensive approach to the entire batting lineup.

Since Mark O'Neil took over as batting coach, it appears that Bangladesh's ability to perform in five-day matches has diminished. While the team showed resilience and character in New Zealand and against some of the world's best bowling attacks, and even exhibited strong temperament against Rangana Herath in Colombo, their performances at home against Australia and in South Africa were riddled with uncharacteristic errors. The top and middle order made elementary mistakes, reflecting a lack of mental and technical preparation. It seems that Mark O'Neil has not been able to maintain the progress achieved under Thilan Samaraweera’s tenure. Despite the potential for improvement, O'Neil has struggled to make a significant impact on Bangladesh's batting.

Given the underwhelming results, it is unlikely that the BCB should consider extending O'Neil’s contract. What Bangladesh urgently needs is a competent and experienced batting coach who can instill discipline, refine technique, and help the team consistently perform at the highest level. Without a capable leader in this role, the team’s batting woes are unlikely to be resolved.

Courtney Walsh has not been Impactful like Heath Streak

 The appointment of Heath Streak as Bangladesh’s bowling coach had a transformative effect, particularly on the pace bowlers, who began to bowl with a level of menace and intensity previously unseen. Under Streak, the bowlers embraced aggression and intent, setting a new benchmark for Bangladesh's bowling attack. However, following Streak's departure last year, the BCB brought in the legendary Courtney Walsh, a move that raised expectations among both fans and analysts alike. Yet, despite his vast experience, Walsh’s tenure has seen the pace attack lose some of its earlier vibrancy.

While Bangladesh's bowlers occasionally produce good spells, they no longer exhibit the same consistent aggression or intent that marked their time under Streak. This shift in approach is concerning for the BCB, as Walsh has been in charge for over a year, and by now, one would have expected a more tangible impact. The lack of sustained improvement under Walsh has left many, myself included, longing for the era of Streak’s leadership.

If Walsh is unable to deliver the results expected of him, the BCB must seriously consider whether continuing with his services is in the best interest of the team. Bangladesh needs a bowling coach who can inspire the same level of intensity and consistency that the team once displayed.

This Test series offers an opportunity for Bangladesh to reflect on its shortcomings and correct its mistakes. While this defeat should not spell the end of their aspirations, failing to address these issues could prove disastrous in the long run. Therefore, it is imperative that the BCB takes decisive and informed action to rectify the current course, ensuring that lessons are learned and the team can move forward with renewed purpose.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Liton Kumar Das: A Beacon of Resilience in Bangladesh's Struggle Against South Africa

The rain-delayed second day of the Test match saw the sun finally shine over the Manuang Oval Cricket Ground in Bloemfontein, but for Bangladesh, the day began in familiar frustration. South Africa’s Hashim Amla and Faf du Plessis, with their trademark class and effortless elegance, cruised to centuries, piling more pressure on Bangladesh’s beleaguered captain, Mushfiqur Rahim. Despite Rahim’s best efforts to curb the runs through defensive tactics, Amla and du Plessis's steady accumulation of runs highlighted the gap in quality, as Faf declared at a dominant 573 for 4.

In an unexpected turn, the injured Imrul Kayes took to the field, opening with Soumya Sarkar. Yet the early South African bowlers, led by Kagiso Rabada, Duanne Olivier, and Wayne Parnell, shattered Bangladesh’s top order with clinical precision. At 65 for 6, the collapse seemed inevitable, and a humiliating defeat loomed large. It was in this moment of despair that Liton Kumar Das emerged, providing a glimmer of hope amidst the wreckage of his team’s failing batting line-up.

Liton Kumar Das: A Moment of Resilience

The situation was dire. Soumya was dismissed cheaply, Mominul was caught behind, and Mushfiq, seemingly flustered, followed his teammates back to the dressing room after a spectacular catch by Temba Bavuma. Mahmudullah Riyad, a man of great temperament in the first innings at Potchefstroom, started with promise but perished to a poor shot against a wide delivery from Parnell. As Bangladesh’s hopes of mounting a respectable reply began to fade, Liton stood resolutely at the crease.

Liton, often a player of great promise but inconsistency, chose the moment to demonstrate his skill and mental fortitude. In the face of the relentless South African pace, he opted not for a defensive mindset but for an intelligent counterattack, reminiscent of classical batting rather than the frantic T20 style that dominates the modern game.

His first boundary came via an edge, but it was his second that showcased his true technique. Parnell, pitching on a good length, was punished with a boundary through long off—Liton had quickly assessed the length and got into position with remarkable clarity. His ability to read the bowler and play with such controlled aggression began to frustrate the South African bowlers.

The Art of Counterattack: Liton’s Mastery

After tea, Bangladesh’s position deteriorated further with the loss of Imrul Kayes and Sabbir Rahman, but Liton remained undeterred. He assumed the role of a calm anchor for the tail-enders, notably Taijul Islam, with great composure and remarkable skill. Liton’s shot selection against South African pacers was outstanding—he exhibited great technique and footwork, especially when confronted by the likes of Rabada.

Rabada, known for his searing pace, was taken on by Liton with remarkable poise. In the 22nd over, Rabada banged in a short ball, and Liton executed a superb hook shot, keeping the ball down on the ground. It was a shot executed with such sublime technique that it stood out as a rare gem in modern cricket, where the hook shot has become less of a common sight.

Liton continued to frustrate Rabada, who switched to a back-of-a-length line outside off. Liton, however, responded with a series of elegant strokes through the offside, two of which were classic boundaries, delivered with perfect timing and balance. Rabada, caught off guard by Liton’s flawless execution, had no answer.

A Lesson in Temperament and Technique

As the innings progressed, Liton’s composure was evident. Against Phehlukwayo, he unleashed a sequence of brilliant boundaries, taking control of the game and dragging Bangladesh out of a seemingly insurmountable hole. His fifty was a milestone, but it was the ease with which he found the gaps, even in the face of relentless pressure, that spoke volumes about his skill and character.

Liton’s partnership with Taijul Islam blossomed into a vital 52-run stand, showcasing his ability to marshal the tail. Phehlukwayo became the next victim of Liton’s calculated aggression, as he dispatched the bowler to all corners of the field, with four boundaries in a single over—a dazzling display of footwork and timing.

However, despite his brilliance, Liton’s innings came to a soft end. Attempting a pull shot against Rabada, he edged the ball to Faf du Plessis, bringing his fine knock to a close. Yet, his effort earned him wide recognition as one of the few bright spots in an otherwise grim batting display by Bangladesh.

Conclusion: A Test of Character

Liton’s innings, though ultimately falling short of what could have been a match-saving knock, provided valuable insight into what Bangladesh need to focus on in their quest for improvement in Test cricket. His batting was a lesson in the right attitude and the right technique. Liton demonstrated that, while the pitch might present challenges, the real test lies in the temperament and approach to the game. His ability to counterattack intelligently, his footwork against pace, and his composure under pressure all point to a player with the potential to be a mainstay in Bangladesh’s Test side.

His performance with both bat and gloves offers hope for Bangladesh’s future in the longer format of the game. Liton Kumar Das has shown that, with the right mental approach, no challenge is insurmountable—a sentiment that should resonate deeply within Bangladesh’s cricketing circle.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Mushfiqur Rahim’s Leadership: A Reflection of Fragility and Missteps

Leadership in cricket, especially at the Test level, is a crucible that demands clarity of thought, tactical acumen, and the ability to inspire. Mushfiqur Rahim’s captaincy during the Bloemfontein Test against South Africa, however, painted a picture of confusion and a troubling lack of accountability. His decisions on the field, compounded by baffling statements off it, not only hurt Bangladesh’s chances but also raised serious questions about his suitability as a leader. 

The Toss: A Gift Squandered 

Winning the toss in cricket is often considered an advantage, offering the captain a chance to dictate terms. Yet, Mushfiqur’s post-match statement—“I think it was my mistake to win the toss”—defies both logic and expectation. This comment, delivered with an emotional undertone, betrayed not only his fragile confidence but also his inability to shoulder responsibility. 

The essence of captaincy lies in using opportunities wisely. At Potchefstroom and Bloemfontein, the toss presented Mushfiqur with a chance to leverage conditions favourable for batting first. Instead, his misreading of the pitch resulted in decisions that left his team vulnerable. To attribute failure to the fortune of winning the toss reflects a mindset unfit for the rigours of Test leadership. 

The real question is not about the toss but about Mushfiqur’s inability to read the track.

Was it the toss or the captain’s judgment that failed Bangladesh? The answer is glaringly obvious. 

The Blame Game: Bowlers and Beyond 

In his post-day press conference, Mushfiqur laid blame on the bowlers, stating, “Our bowling wasn’t up to the standard.” While the bowlers’ performances were not exemplary, this critique conveniently ignored the captain’s role in their ineffectiveness. 

Let us revisit the critical moments: 

1. Field Settings: Starting with only two slips for Mustafizur Rahman, despite favourable conditions, deprived the bowler of attacking options. A leg slip was inexplicably placed, forcing Mustafizur to bowl on middle and leg, playing into Dean Elgar’s strengths. 

2. Bowling Changes: Within the first six overs, Mushfiqur replaced his new-ball bowlers with Rubel Hossain and part-timer Soumya Sarkar—a chaotic rotation that disrupted rhythm and ceded momentum to the South African batsmen. 

3. Defensive Fields: Throughout the first session, defensive field placements allowed the opposition to settle. Aggressive bowling without aggressive fields is akin to a blade without its edge. 

4. Captain’s Positioning: Mushfiqur’s decision to field outside the inner circle, citing instructions from the team management, was perplexing. A captain’s presence in the inner circle is vital for strategy and communication. Delegating this responsibility to others undermined the very essence of his role. 

Blaming the bowlers for failing to execute plans is futile when the plans themselves are flawed. Leadership demands ownership, and Mushfiqur’s reluctance to acknowledge his missteps only deepened the team’s woes. 

The Role of a Captain: Courage, Intelligence, and Autonomy 

Mushfiqur’s claim that he was merely following the team management’s instructions raises a fundamental question: why, then, is he the captain? Cricket, unlike soccer, places the captain at the heart of decision-making. While inputs from coaches and team management are valuable, the captain must have the courage and intelligence to make independent decisions on the field. 

A captain who abdicates this responsibility reduces himself to a figurehead, eroding the team’s trust and morale. Mushfiqur’s remarks not only reflected a lack of autonomy but also hinted at a tendency to deflect blame—a trait unbecoming of a leader. 

The Personality Gap 

Leadership in Test cricket requires more than tactical knowledge; it demands a commanding personality, the ability to inspire confidence, and the resilience to face adversity. Mushfiqur’s repeated missteps and emotional responses suggest a leader struggling under the weight of expectations. 

Contrast this with players like Tamim Iqbal, whose assertive personality and understanding of the game have often been evident. Tamim’s leadership qualities, coupled with his ability to handle pressure, make him a compelling candidate for the role of Test captain. 

The Way Forward 

For Bangladesh cricket to progress, the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) must reevaluate its leadership choices. Mushfiqur Rahim’s tenure as Test captain has been marked by inconsistency, defensive tactics, and an inability to learn from mistakes. While his contributions as a player remain invaluable, leadership may not align with his strengths. 

Investing in a captain like Tamim Iqbal, who embodies the qualities of a modern leader, could rejuvenate the team and instil a sense of direction. Leadership is not about avoiding mistakes but about learning from them and inspiring others to rise above challenges. 

Conclusion 

Mushfiqur Rahim’s captaincy at Bloemfontein will be remembered not for its strategic brilliance but for its misjudgments and misplaced accountability. His comments off the field only underscored the gaps in his leadership. For Bangladesh cricket, this moment should serve as a turning point—a chance to reflect, reassess, and rebuild. Leadership is the cornerstone of success, and it is time for Bangladesh to find a leader who can truly rise to the occasion. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The Enigma of Mushfiqur Rahim’s Captaincy: A Study in Stubbornness

On October 4, 2017, ESPNcricinfo’s South African correspondent, Firdose Moonda, painted a vivid picture of the Bloemfontein pitch ahead of the second Test between South Africa and Bangladesh. Photographs showed a verdant strip, indistinguishable from the outfield, sparking speculation of a pace-friendly track. By the time of the toss, however, the reality was starkly different. Persistent rain had kept the pitch under covers, and what emerged was a dry surface, devoid of the anticipated grass and bounce. It was, as South African captain Faf du Plessis quipped, “a very normal cricket wicket,” ideal for batting first. 

Yet, Mushfiqur Rahim, leading Bangladesh, defied conventional wisdom and chose to field first—a decision that raised eyebrows and evoked ridicule. Du Plessis, with a smirk, encapsulated the incredulity of the moment, remarking, “Nine times out of 10, you bat first.” What followed was a masterclass in poor decision-making and flawed execution, an episode emblematic of Mushfiqur’s troubled captaincy. 

The Repetition of Errors 

Cricket, at its highest level, demands adaptability and a willingness to learn from past mistakes. Yet, Mushfiqur Rahim’s tenure as captain often seemed like a case study in the refusal to evolve. His decisions at Bloemfontein mirrored the errors made just days earlier at Potchefstroom. The toss decision, the defensive field placements, and the chaotic use of bowlers—all pointed to a captain who either lacked awareness or stubbornly resisted the lessons of experience. 

The decision to field first was perplexing enough, but the execution compounded the problem. Mustafizur Rahman, operating with the breeze from the Loch Logan End, was given a defensive field with only two slips and a leg slip—a placement that forced him to bowl on the middle and leg stump, allowing Dean Elgar to score with ease. Subashis Roy, after conceding 15 runs in a single over, was inexplicably replaced by part-time medium-pacer Soumya Sarkar within the first five overs—a move that defied logic on the opening morning of a Test match. By the 10th over, Mushfiqur had already cycled through four bowlers, a pattern more befitting of a club-level game than international cricket. 

Defensive Fields and Aggressive Bowlers 

Even when the Bangladeshi pacers found rhythm post-lunch, Mushfiqur’s defensive field placements undermined their efforts. The aggressive intent of Mustafizur, Rubel Hossain, and Subashis Roy was neutralized by a captain who seemed more intent on damage control than wicket-taking. South Africa’s batsmen, untroubled by the lack of attacking fields, treated the session as a leisurely outing, accumulating runs with ease. 

This recurring pattern of defensive captaincy not only frustrated the bowlers but also highlighted a deeper issue: Mushfiqur’s inability to trust his players and his own instincts. In Test cricket, bold decisions often yield the greatest rewards, but Mushfiqur seemed trapped in a cycle of indecision and fear. 

The Psychological Barrier 

Why does Mushfiqur persist with these flawed strategies? Psychology offers a potential explanation. Experts describe a phenomenon known as choice-supportive bias, where individuals rationalize their decisions post hoc, attributing positive qualities to their choices while downplaying their faults. Mushfiqur’s repeated justifications for his decisions—often couched in emotional or weakly logical terms—suggest a deep-seated reluctance to acknowledge mistakes. 

This bias is further compounded by a tendency to avoid discomfort. Admitting to errors is inherently unpleasant, but it is also the first step toward growth. Mushfiqur’s refusal to confront his missteps creates a self-perpetuating loop: flawed decisions lead to poor outcomes, which are then rationalized, ensuring the cycle continues. 

A Case Study in Leadership 

Mushfiqur’s captaincy offers a fascinating case study for leadership and behavioral psychology. His steadfast adherence to flawed strategies, even in the face of repeated failures, underscores the importance of adaptability and self-awareness in leadership. Neuroscientists and psychologists might find in him a rare subject to study the mechanisms of stubbornness and the barriers to learning from failure. 

For Bangladesh cricket, however, this is no academic exercise. Leadership at the international level is not just about tactics; it is about inspiring confidence, fostering trust, and making decisions that maximize the team’s potential. Mushfiqur’s struggles as captain suggest a disconnect between his role and his natural inclinations—a gap that has often left Bangladesh adrift in critical moments. 

The Way Forward 

To move forward, Mushfiqur must first confront the truth of his own fallibility. Mistakes, while inevitable, are only valuable if they lead to growth. A captain who cannot learn from the past is a liability to his team, no matter how skilled he may be as a player. 

For Bangladesh cricket, the lesson is equally clear: leadership is not just about seniority or individual talent but about the ability to adapt, inspire, and make sound decisions under pressure. As the team continues its journey on the global stage, it must prioritize leaders who embody these qualities, ensuring that the lessons of Bloemfontein are not lost to history. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Fearsome Heights: The Evolution of Fast Bowling from the Caribbean to the Transvaal

 In the golden age of fast bowling, the West Indies unleashed a battery of towering pacemen who not only terrorized batsmen but also captivated spectators with their raw power and imposing presence. Joel Garner, standing at a staggering 6'8", bowled with a windmill-like action that seemed to summon tempests. His expressionless visage after each delivery was as chilling as his toe-crushing yorkers. Garner didn’t need theatrics; his very existence on the pitch was a nightmare personified. If one were to imagine him with wings and fangs, he’d be the perfect casting choice for a Dracula movie. 

Then came Curtly Ambrose, the 6'7" Antiguan colossus whose piercing glare and menacing aura could make even the bravest batsmen wilt. The fifth Test at Perth in 1993 remains etched in memory—not just for his fiery spells but for the sheer terror he exuded. His red eyes and steam-like intensity gave him the demeanour of a predator stalking its prey, ready to deliver the final blow with a snorter aimed at the ribs. 

For fans of fast bowling, these "Eiffel Tower" pacemen were the ultimate thrill—unpredictable, unrelenting, and unforgettable. 

The Gentle Giant from Transvaal 

Fast forward to the modern era, and the fearsome archetype found an unlikely outlier in Morne Morkel. At 6'5", Morkel had the physique of a destroyer but the demeanour of a gentleman. With his disarming smile and boy-next-door charm, he seemed more likely to offer you a cup of tea than a searing bouncer. 

Yet, beneath the calm exterior lay a predator of a different kind. Morkel’s journey began humbly, bowling to Jacques Kallis in the nets as a nervous youngster. Ray Jennings, his mentor, introduced him to South Africa’s finest, and Kallis immediately saw the potential. “He should be playing for South Africa,” Kallis remarked. Three years later, Morkel was sharing the dressing room with the great all-rounder, and the rest is history. 

For much of his career, Morkel lived in the shadow of Dale Steyn, whose fiery temperament and devastating spells often stole the limelight. Morkel’s Achilles’ heel—a chronic issue with overstepping—also undermined his reputation. Yet, when the stars aligned, Morkel’s spells were symphonies of destruction, and the world witnessed the quiet giant transform into a panther on the hunt. 

The Panther Awakens: Potchefstroom 

Day 4 of the first Test at Potchefstroom was a stage set for Morkel to remind the world of his prowess. Under gloomy skies, the Bangladesh batsmen faced a predator in full flight. 

His opening delivery was a harbinger of doom—a full-length ball angled in from wide off the crease, swinging late at 140 km/h. Tamim Iqbal managed to defend it, but the unease was palpable. Morkel’s run-up was smooth, his grip on the red cherry firm, and his intensity unmistakable. 

The fourth ball of the over was a masterpiece. Wide off the crease, Morkel delivered a length ball that deviated sharply, sneaking past Tamim’s defences to rattle the stumps. It was the kind of delivery that would have tested even the greatest—be it Viv Richards or Don Bradman. 

Mominul Haque, fresh off a strong performance, was the next victim. Another length ball, delivered with precision, thudded into his pads before he could decide whether to move forward or back. The umpire’s finger went up, and Mominul walked off, a picture of disbelief. 

Bangladesh captain Mushfiqur Rahim was then undone by a nip-backer that shattered his stumps. However, fortune intervened as Morkel had overstepped—his 14th no-ball in Test cricket. The no-ball curse cut short what could have been a career-defining spell. Soon after, a thigh strain forced Morkel off the field, and the Bangladesh batsmen heaved a collective sigh of relief. 

Aggression Redefined 

“Aggression with the ball is being able to bowl at 90mph for an entire day in a Test match, to have good body language, and even if you are leaking runs, never show the batsman that he is on top of you,” Morkel once said in an interview. At Potchefstroom, he embodied this ethos. His spell was a masterclass in controlled aggression—precise, unrelenting, and devastating. 

For Bangladesh, it was a harsh lesson in the unforgiving nature of Test cricket. For Morkel, it was a reminder of his enduring brilliance. While he may lack the theatrical menace of Garner or Ambrose, Morkel’s spells carry a quiet ferocity that is no less effective. 

The gentle giant from Transvaal proved that he doesn’t need red eyes or fearsome glares to haunt batsmen. When the panther is on the prowl, even the bravest find themselves in disarray.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Mominul Haque: Rediscovering the Art of Resilience

Once heralded as Bangladesh cricket’s brightest Test prospect, Mominul Haque found himself grappling with an alarming slump in form that nearly erased him from the national conversation. From averaging an impressive 51.17 in 2014, his numbers plummeted to 36.86 in 2015, 23.50 in 2016, and 28.25 in 2017. This downward spiral culminated in his exclusion from the 14-man squad for the Test series against Australia, a decision that sent ripples through Bangladesh’s cricketing fraternity.

The backlash from fans and journalists was swift and severe. At the press conference, chief selector Minhajul Abedin faced intense scrutiny but remained composed. "Mominul made just one fifty in the last six innings. He was dropped because of his form," he asserted, adding, “Others are ahead of him based on current performance.” Despite the controversy, Mominul’s fortunes shifted dramatically. An eye infection sidelined Mosaddek Hossain, and following intervention from BCB President Nazmul Hassan, Mominul was drafted back into the squad.

However, the comeback was far from triumphant. In the second Test, batting at his favoured number four in the first innings, he showed flashes of his old self before faltering. An uncharacteristic stint at number eight in the second innings only magnified his struggles. Critics sharpened their knives, and questions loomed over his place in the squad.

A Test of Character: South Africa Beckons

With a drawn series against Australia behind them, Bangladesh faced an intimidating tour to South Africa. For Mominul, it was a chance to prove he belonged at the highest level. The challenge was daunting, as Morne Morkel and Kagiso Rabada unleashed a barrage of pace and aggression. When Imrul Kayes departed early, Mominul was thrust into the fray at number three—a position where his average of 38.14 hardly inspired confidence.

Faced with adversity, Mominul drew upon the lessons of a previous encounter against New Zealand, where he had counterattacked to rescue his team from 8 for 2. This time, he chose a different path. Eschewing his natural flair, he opted for patience and discipline. The result? A gritty 77 that spoke volumes about his determination to adapt and evolve.

Technical Evolution: Breaking Down the Knock

Mominul’s innings was more than just a display of resilience; it was a masterclass in adapting technique under pressure. 

Occupying the Crease

Understanding his precarious form, Mominul prioritized survival over flamboyance. Early nerves were evident, but his resolve to spend time at the crease allowed him to regain rhythm. With each passing over, his confidence grew, and he began to craft his innings with measured precision.

Straightening the Bat Path

A significant flaw in Mominul’s recent technique had been the angle of his bat during defence. On Day 2, his bat came down toward the second slip, disrupting his balance and leaving gaps between the bat and pad. By Day 3, these issues had been rectified. His straight bat and improved alignment enabled him to time his drives exquisitely, anchoring the innings with authority.

Masterful Footwork

Keshav Maharaj, South Africa’s wily spinner, posed a formidable challenge with his variations. Mominul’s response was a lesson in footwork. Dancing down the track, he disrupted Maharaj’s length and used his supple wrists to convert threatening deliveries into scoring opportunities.

Back Foot Trigger

On South African pitches, the initial trigger movement often dictates success. Mominul mirrored the techniques of greats like Sachin Tendulkar and Brian Lara, whose backward movement allowed them to play late and under their eyes. This adjustment was instrumental in countering Rabada and Morkel’s pace and bounce.

Redemption and the Road Ahead

Mominul’s knock was a beacon of hope—not only for him but for Bangladesh cricket. In rediscovering his form, he reminded selectors, critics, and fans of his immense value to the team. For the Tigers, consistency at the top order is a necessity, not a luxury. Mominul’s resurgence could be the spark that reignites his career and strengthens Bangladesh’s Test aspirations.

While one knock doesn’t silence critics, it can shift the narrative. Mominul Haque’s innings was not just a score on the board; it was a statement—a testament to grit, adaptability, and the unyielding spirit of a player unwilling to fade away.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Liton Das: A Glimpse of Promise Amid South Africa’s Strategic Play

The atmosphere at Potchefstroom shifted unexpectedly after the tea break on the second day of the first Test. South African captain Faf du Plessis, known for his sharp tactical instincts, declared his team’s innings at 496 for 3, leaving spectators puzzled. The home side seemed poised to cross the 550-run mark, but Faf had a deeper game plan—a move reminiscent of his shrewd declaration against Australia in the third Test of 2016. 

Back then, Du Plessis had capitalized on David Warner’s absence from the field due to injury, catching the Australians off guard by forcing them to bat underprepared. At Potchefstroom, he applied a similar ploy, targeting Bangladesh’s batting backbone, Tamim Iqbal. Observing Tamim’s prolonged absence from the field, Faf sensed an opportunity to disrupt the visiting side’s rhythm. His decision compelled Bangladesh to send out an unfamiliar opening pair of Imrul Kayes and Liton Das, with Liton, fresh from 146 grueling overs behind the stumps, facing the daunting task of countering South Africa’s fiery pace attack.

Liton Das: Baptism Under Fire

Stepping out to open the innings in such high-pressure circumstances was an unenviable challenge for Liton Das. The Dinajpur-born wicketkeeper-batsman showed composure far beyond his experience, enduring the probing spells of Morne Morkel and Kagiso Rabada with a blend of courage and technical finesse.  

The opening delivery from Morkel—a full, rapid ball angling into the middle and leg stump—was enough to test even seasoned batsmen. Yet, Liton exhibited remarkable calm, shuffling his feet confidently to flick it down the leg for a couple of runs. It was a signal of intent, but the road ahead was treacherous. Morkel responded with a barrage of searing deliveries, testing Liton’s reflexes and fortitude. Against the third delivery of the over, Liton’s response—a precise back-foot defence—showcased his ability to absorb pressure and adjust to the pace. 

A Masterclass in Technique

Liton’s performance against Morkel was an insightful exhibition of modern batsmanship. By the third over, Morkel began probing outside off-stump, searching for an error in judgment. Liton, however, remained disciplined. He displayed the poise of a seasoned opener, leaving deliveries that posed a threat and curbing any reckless instinct to chase balls outside the line. 

His footwork was precise and assured, a hallmark of his technical prowess. When Morkel overpitched, Liton capitalized with an effortless drive, transferring his weight seamlessly from back foot to front, caressing the ball with perfect timing. 

It was in the ninth over, however, that Liton truly stamped his authority. Morkel unleashed a short-pitched ball of venomous pace, targeting Liton’s body. The response was breathtaking—a controlled pivot on the back foot, his wrists rolling over the ball in a manner reminiscent of Ricky Ponting. The result was a perfectly placed boundary through backward square leg. A similar delivery followed, and Liton dispatched it with equal elegance. 

A Glimpse of Greatness

What set Liton apart during his brief innings was his ability to get on top of the bounce. This quality, combined with his compact technique, high backlift, and still head, made him a captivating prospect at the top of the order. His balance, both physically and mentally, was noteworthy for a batsman thrust into an unfamiliar role under immense pressure. 

But for all his brilliance, Liton’s innings ended on a note of frustration. Morkel tempted him with a delivery outside off-stump, and this time, the youngster’s patience wavered. Reaching for the ball, he edged it into the slips, marking the end of his valiant effort. 

Lessons to Be Learned

Liton’s dismissal highlighted an area for growth: the need for temperance in building innings. His eagerness to dominate the bowling, while admirable, sometimes led to lapses in judgment. Patience and shot selection, especially on testing pitches, are qualities he must hone to realize his full potential. 

The silver lining is that these are learnable skills, ones that come with experience and consistent opportunities at the highest level. For a player with his technical foundation and natural talent, the ceiling is high. What Liton needs now is trust from the team management—a clear role, ample exposure, and the confidence that he belongs on the international stage. 

A Star in the Making

Liton Das’s performance at Potchefstroom was a microcosm of Bangladesh’s Test cricket journey: flashes of brilliance, moments of vulnerability, and lessons to be absorbed. Against one of the world’s most fearsome bowling attacks, Liton exhibited the resilience and skill required to succeed at the highest level. 

His ability to handle pace, particularly on bouncy tracks, makes him an invaluable asset for Bangladesh in conditions outside the subcontinent. If nurtured properly, Liton could become the dependable top-order batsman that Bangladesh has long searched for—a player capable of weathering storms and delivering artistry under pressure. 

In a match dominated by Faf du Plessis’ tactical brilliance and South Africa’s overwhelming superiority, Liton Das’s short but impactful innings was a beacon of hope for Bangladesh’s cricketing future. The stage is set; it is now up to Liton and the team to seize the moment and turn potential into legacy. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Mushfiqur Rahim’s Captaincy: A Regressive Stint at Potchefstroom

Bangladesh's maiden tour of South Africa in 2002 was a steep learning curve. A promising start in the second Test at Potchefstroom, then North West Cricket Stadium, gave way to an embarrassing collapse, as the team succumbed to an innings and 160-run defeat. Such setbacks, however, were forgivable for a side still finding its footing in Test cricket. Fast forward 15 years to 2017, and the expectations were different. The Tigers had shown glimpses of maturity, with notable Test wins and growing experience. Yet, on the very same ground, Mushfiqur Rahim’s questionable decisions at the toss, field placements, and overall captaincy reignited doubts about Bangladesh’s ability to adapt in the longest format. 

A Familiar Misstep at the Toss

The Potchefstroom pitch had a reputation for being batting-friendly, a fact underscored by Kagiso Rabada’s pre-match assessment: 

“It is good to bat on, and the outfield is extremely quick. There is still something in the wicket for the bowlers, but these are good batting conditions.”

Even visually, the pitch bore the hallmarks of a dry, even surface with good bounce—ideal for batting. Yet Mushfiqur, inexplicably, opted to field first after winning the toss. This wasn’t the first time he misread conditions; in 2014, he had taken a similar approach on a flat track in Kingstown, where Chris Gayle and Kraigg Brathwaite piled on the runs for the West Indies. The repetition of such a tactical error raises serious questions about Mushfiqur’s ability to interpret pitches effectively, despite over a decade of international experience. 

Blaming this decision on the team management or coaching staff is a deflection. Ultimately, the captain is the final authority on such matters. A Test captain must possess clarity of thought and confidence in their instincts. Mushfiqur’s decision betrayed neither. 

Squandering the New Ball with Aimless Experimentation

If choosing to field was a mistake, Mushfiqur’s handling of the new ball was a disaster. Early overs in South African conditions are often the most fruitful for seamers, offering lateral movement and bounce. However, Mushfiq’s strategy lacked aggression. 

In a bewildering move, he introduced Mehidy Hasan Miraz, an off-spinner, as early as the sixth over. While Miraz’s skills with a new ball are well-documented in subcontinental conditions, where lower bounce aids his trajectory, Potchefstroom’s surface demands pace and discipline. Unsurprisingly, Miraz proved ineffective, forcing Mushfiq to revert to his pacers—Taskin Ahmed and Mustafizur Rahman—after South Africa’s openers had already settled. 

This chopping and changing of bowlers within the first 13 overs not only wasted the new ball but also handed the psychological edge to South Africa. Aiden Markram and Dean Elgar capitalized on this lack of coherence, crafting a dominant opening partnership. 

Defensive Field Placements Undermine Bowlers

Mushfiqur’s field placements compounded the problems. His decision to abandon an attacking slip cordon early in the innings reflected a defensive mindset unworthy of Test cricket. With South Africa yet to cross the 100-run mark, Mushfiq set just one slip for Taskin Ahmed, allowing the batsmen to score freely. 

A particularly glaring example of poor fielding strategy occurred when Mustafizur Rahman was positioned at backward point—a role demanding agility and sharp reflexes. When Markram edged a mistimed drive off Taskin, the opportunity was squandered as Mustafiz failed to capitalize on the chance. A more natural fielder, such as Sabbir Rahman, would have been better suited for this position. 

The defensive mindset extended to Taskin’s line of attack. Instead of pitching on off-stump with an attacking field, Taskin was forced to bowl middle-and-leg lines, largely due to Mushfiq’s insistence on a leg slip. While the intention to exploit Elgar’s flick shot was understandable, the timing and execution of this strategy were misaligned. Such tactics, better suited for later overs, proved counterproductive when the ball was still new. 

The Absence of a Contingency Plan

In Test cricket, captains must always have a Plan B. When Plan A falters, the ability to adapt and innovate becomes paramount. Unfortunately, Mushfiqur displayed neither aggression nor imagination. His default strategy appeared to be damage control rather than proactive engagement. 

An effective Test captain balances attack with foresight, creating opportunities for breakthroughs even in adverse conditions. Mushfiq’s leadership lacked both qualities. His inability to adjust field settings or inspire his bowlers translated into a monotonous defensive display, allowing South Africa to dictate terms with ease. 

A Regressive Step for Bangladesh Cricket

The Potchefstroom Test was a stark reminder that Bangladesh still struggles with the nuances of Test cricket. While the team has made strides in skill development and occasional victories, lapses in judgment at the leadership level continue to undermine their progress. 

For a team aspiring to establish itself in the Test arena, such elementary mistakes are costly. A captain who cannot interpret pitches, manage resources effectively, or exhibit tactical acumen in challenging conditions limits the potential of an otherwise talented side. 

A Need for Accountability

Mushfiqur Rahim’s tenure as captain has been marked by both promise and frustration. His contributions as a batsman are undeniable, but his captaincy raises critical concerns. Bangladesh’s performance at Potchefstroom wasn’t just a defeat—it was a missed opportunity to showcase their evolution as a Test side. 

If Bangladesh hopes to compete consistently at the highest level, they need leaders who can marry tactical awareness with on-field execution. Mushfiqur’s shortcomings in this Test serve as a cautionary tale for the team’s future, emphasizing the need for introspection, accountability, and growth. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar