The Enigma of Shakib Al Hasan: A Test Captaincy Conundrum

Nazmul Hassan is a tricky thinker, a quality that has served him well in navigating the complexities of cricket administration in Bangladesh. His ability to make calculated moves, akin to a seasoned chess player, has often yielded impressive results, even amidst criticism from the local press and former cricketers. Yet, such critiques seem to faze him little; as the saying goes, "barking dogs seldom bite."

Every decision Nazmul has made so far has been marked by confidence and a risk appetite. However, his bold strategies often come with a caveat—a lingering "but." Today’s "Breaking News" surrounding Shakib Al Hasan’s potential return as Bangladesh’s Test captain is no exception. The question remains: Is Shakib truly interested in the role?

If the move to reinstate Shakib as Test captain is motivated by a desire to anchor him in the longer format and divert his focus from lucrative foreign leagues, it could be a masterstroke. However, this strategy hinges on one critical factor: Shakib’s willingness and enthusiasm to lead. Shakib is a mercurial figure, a player who thrives on instinct and emotion. Forcing responsibilities upon him without his genuine interest risks undermining his effectiveness. Shakib must be granted the freedom to chart his own course while staying within the bounds of team discipline.

Shakib’s past actions have often sparked debate. His request for a break from Test cricket ahead of a crucial series against South Africa was seen by many as crossing the line. In response, the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) appears to be placing the weight of Test captaincy on his shoulders, perhaps as a way to channel his focus and commitment. Yet, the critical question remains: Is Shakib ready to embrace this responsibility?

There is no denying Shakib’s credentials as a leader. He is arguably a more astute captain than most of his contemporaries. However, his success as a leader hinges on his enjoyment of the role. Shakib is a complex character, a blend of brilliance and unpredictability—a mix reminiscent of sporting greats like Romário and Kevin Pietersen. With Shakib, the outcome is always uncertain: it could be a moment of genius or an act of folly.

As with any professional athlete, maturity and a sense of responsibility develop over time. For Shakib, this could be an opportunity to channel his vast experience and tactical acumen into motivating the Test side. His past collaborations with stalwarts like Mashrafe Mortaza and Mushfiqur Rahim have shown that he thrives in leadership roles, even under challenging circumstances. The trio once confidently led the team against Sri Lanka without a head coach, demonstrating their ability to rise to the occasion.

Taking on the Test captaincy should not intimidate Shakib but rather inspire him to leave a lasting legacy in the longest format of the game. For Bangladesh cricket, his leadership could mark a turning point, provided he approaches the role with the same passion and professionalism that have defined his illustrious career. The BCB, in turn, must ensure that Shakib is supported and empowered, allowing him to strike the delicate balance between freedom and accountability. In doing so, both Shakib and Bangladesh cricket stand to benefit immensely.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar      

The Shakoor Rana-Mike Gatting Saga: A Study in Controversy and Conflict

Cricket, often romanticized as a gentleman’s game, has occasionally descended into episodes of acrimony and controversy, leaving indelible marks on its storied history. Few incidents encapsulate this better than the clash between Pakistani umpire Shakoor Rana and English captain Mike Gatting during the Faisalabad Test of 1987—a confrontation that transcended the boundary lines to become a diplomatic and cultural flashpoint.

Shakoor Rana: The Provocateur of Controversy

Shakoor Rana’s career as an umpire was as much defined by his flair for confrontation as it was by his decision-making. From the outset, he carried an air of defiance, often challenging players and teams with an uncompromising demeanor that drew both ire and fascination. His first major brush with controversy came in 1978, during India’s historic tour of Pakistan after a 17-year hiatus. When he reprimanded Mohinder Amarnath for running onto the danger area during his follow-through, an outraged Sunil Gavaskar accused Rana of turning a blind eye to similar infractions by Imran Khan and Sarfraz Nawaz. Although the incident was diplomatically resolved, it signaled the beginning of Rana’s tumultuous relationship with international cricket.

The umpire’s contentious calls continued to plague touring sides. New Zealand’s normally affable captain Jeremy Coney once threatened to pull his team off the field in 1984 after a questionable decision involving Javed Miandad. Ravi Shastri, recalling his own experiences in Pakistan, likened playing against Pakistan to facing a four-pronged pace attack—Imran, Sarfraz, Khizer Hayat, and Shakoor Rana. Rana, it seemed, was as much a player in the drama as those wielding the bat and ball.

Mike Gatting: The Combustible Counterpart

Mike Gatting, England’s burly and combative captain, was no stranger to controversy himself. Known for his fiery temper and uncompromising attitude, Gatting’s tenure as captain was punctuated by brushes with authority and moral scandals. It was almost inevitable that these two fractious figures—Rana and Gatting—would collide in a manner that shook the cricketing world.

The stage was set in Faisalabad during the second Test of England’s 1987 tour of Pakistan. With three balls left on the second day, Gatting moved David Capel from deep square-leg to prevent a single, claiming he had informed the batsman, Saleem Malik. Rana, standing at square leg, intervened, accusing Gatting of cheating. What followed was an explosive confrontation: fingers wagged, obscenities flew, and the stump microphone ensured that the world listened in on their heated exchange.

The Fallout: Cricket Meets Diplomacy

Rana refused to continue the match until Gatting apologized—a demand the English captain staunchly resisted. The standoff escalated to the point of halting play for an entire day, necessitating the involvement of the British Foreign Office and the Pakistani Cricket Board. Under pressure from the English selectors, who were already dissatisfied with his leadership, Gatting begrudgingly penned a brief apology. Rana, never one to shy away from theatrics, reportedly kept the note under his pillow as a trophy of his victory in the altercation.

The incident left a lasting legacy. Rana stood in just three more Tests, yet he remained unapologetic, basking in his newfound fame and charging significant sums for recounting the episode in interviews. Meanwhile, Gatting’s career as captain unravelled further. Just months later, he was removed from his post following a scandal involving a barmaid—a sacking that many believe the English selectors had been planning since the Faisalabad fiasco.

Legacy and Reflection

The Rana-Gatting affair has been dissected endlessly, evolving into a cricketing parable of clashing egos and cultural misunderstandings. Gatting himself later admitted it was not his finest moment, though some critics argue he should have apologized not for his behaviour but for apologizing to Rana. The incident also cast a spotlight on the growing tensions between touring teams and local umpires in an era before the advent of neutral officiating—a reform partly inspired by episodes like this.

While Gatting and Rana have since become footnotes in the broader narrative of cricket, their infamous confrontation serves as a reminder of the game’s human vulnerabilities. It underscores the complexity of personalities and politics that often bubble beneath cricket’s veneer of decorum, revealing that even a game built on gentlemanly ideals can sometimes resemble a battlefield.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

A Shocker: Italy Will Not Fly To Russia

The night was heavy with despair at San Siro. Italy pressed. They pushed. Yet, they failed to breach the Swedish defence. As the final whistle echoed, Gian Piero Ventura looked shattered on the sidelines. Daniele De Rossi seethed with anger, and the iconic Gianluigi Buffon, in a moment of profound heartbreak, shed tears that resonated with millions of Azzurri fans around the globe. For a nation steeped in footballing tradition, the unthinkable had occurred—Italy would not grace the World Cup stage in 2018.

This was a cataclysmic moment in Italian football, a cruel déjà vu of 1958 when Northern Ireland shut the door on Italy’s World Cup ambitions. That absence six decades ago was an anomaly; since then, Italy had been a permanent fixture, lifting the trophy twice and finishing as runners-up twice. Yet here we were, on the cusp of modern football history, with Italy inexplicably sidelined from the greatest show on Earth.

A team of such illustrious pedigree—renowned for its defensive mastery, tactical ingenuity, and thrilling counterattacks—was now reduced to spectators. How could this have happened?

An Azzurri Supporter’s Lament

For me, an admirer of Italian football since my school days, the pain was personal. Serie A in its heyday captivated me, and Italia '90 solidified my allegiance to the Azzurri alongside Brazil and Germany. Over the decades, Italy’s defenders, goalkeepers, and clutch strikers brought unmatched joy to the beautiful game. But last night, Sweden dealt a fatal blow to those cherished memories.

A Tactical Disaster

Italy’s failure can largely be laid at the feet of Gian Piero Ventura. When Antonio Conte left the national team, he handed over a squad transformed into a cohesive and promising unit. Under Ventura, that transformation unravelled. The brilliance faded, leaving behind a shadow of the team that once struck fear into opponents.

Ventura’s reign was reminiscent of Carlos Dunga’s ill-fated second tenure with Brazil—a coach whose decisions were dictated by personal preferences rather than tactical acumen. Much like Dunga, Ventura favoured ageing players over dynamic talents. Brazil’s footballing hierarchy realized their mistake in time; Italy, unfortunately, did not.

The decisions were baffling. Lorenzo Insigne, arguably Italy’s most creative and clinical forward, was inexplicably confined to the bench. Ciro Immobile, a striker whose golden touch seemed to have deserted him, was entrusted with leading the attack. Meanwhile, talents like Mario Balotelli—a natural number nine—and Stephan El Shaarawy—perfect for exploiting Sweden’s defensive flanks—were overlooked. Instead, Matteo Darmian, more suited to defensive roles, was thrust into attacking duties.

A Tactical Void

Italy’s midfield, led by Jorginho and Antonio Candreva, showed flashes of cohesion. They spread the play, moved with pace, and created opportunities. Yet the absence of a genuine finisher rendered their efforts futile. The lack of coordination in the final third pointed squarely to Ventura’s inability to devise a coherent attacking strategy.

Ventura’s failure wasn’t limited to the tactical realm. His pedigree—marked by a modest record in Serie C—was ill-suited for a team of Italy’s stature. The signs of decline were evident long before that fateful night in Milan. Struggling against Macedonia in qualifiers should have set alarm bells ringing. But the Italian football federation’s inertia allowed mediocrity to fester.

 A Painful Epilogue

The fallout from Ventura’s tenure extends beyond the 2018 World Cup. Italy’s absence was not just a national tragedy but a global loss for football. For fans who cherish the game beyond the polarizing realms of Lionel Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo, and club allegiances, Italy’s brand of football was a cultural and emotional cornerstone.

This debacle serves as a cautionary tale. In football, history and tradition mean little without vision and decisive action. The Azzurri’s failure is a stark reminder that complacency and mismanagement can erode even the most storied legacies. For now, we mourn not just Italy’s absence but also the dimming of a tradition that has illuminated football for generations

Thank You

Faisal Caesar  

A Cricketing Renaissance: The Chandika Hathurusingha Effect on Bangladesh Cricket

Every cricketing nation has its watershed moment - a defining period when mediocrity gives way to ambition. For Bangladesh, the years between 2014 and 2017, under the stewardship of Chandika Hathurusingha, represent such a chapter. His tenure redefined the team's philosophy, instilling discipline and pragmatism, and recalibrated the nation's cricketing trajectory. What Hathurusingha achieved was not merely a string of victories; it was the construction of a cricketing identity that exuded boldness, clarity, and adaptability.

Chandika Hathurusingha in 2014, Bangladesh cricket remained a tale of unfulfilled potential.

The national team oscillated between occasional brilliance and prolonged mediocrity. Neither their style of play nor their results reflected any sense of consistency or ambition. However, Hathurusingha’s appointment marked the beginning of a dramatic transformation that rewrote the narrative of Bangladesh cricket. Within months, the team adopted a fearless approach, abandoning outdated strategies in favour of a more modern and aggressive style. This bold shift led to unprecedented success across formats, elevating Bangladesh into a force to be reckoned with.

Rewriting the Script: The Shift from Spin to Pace

Before Hathurusingha’s arrival, Bangladesh cricket was trapped in a tactical rut, overly dependent on spinners and the home advantage. This mindset was a reflection of insecurity - a reluctance to embrace change. Hathurusingha disrupted this inertia by prioritizing pace bowling. Under his guidance, the team’s fast-bowling unit - led by Mashrafe Mortaza and comprising the likes of Taskin Ahmed, Rubel Hossain, and Al-Amin Hossain - evolved from mere support acts into match-winners.

This was a seismic shift. Pace bowling demanded better fitness, deeper analysis, and sharper execution, traits the team had previously lacked. The transformation was gradual but unmistakable: Bangladesh began to win not just on familiar, spinning tracks but in conditions where seam movement and bounce dictated terms and formats, elevating Bangladesh into a force to be reckoned with.

 Statistical Resurgence: The ODI Renaissance 

Before Hathurusingha’s arrival, Bangladesh’s ODI win-loss ratio was a dismal 0.4, and excluding matches against lower-ranked sides, their record against top-tier nations was even bleaker - 27 wins in 191 matches, with a ratio of just 0.16. Hathurusingha, however, transformed this dynamic almost overnight. During his tenure, Bangladesh won 25 of 52 ODIs, improving their win-loss ratio to 1.086.

Key milestones during this period included their quarterfinal appearance at the 2015 World Cup, where Bangladesh famously knocked England out of the tournament. They followed this success by defeating powerhouses like India, Pakistan, South Africa, and  Afghanistan at home, and nearly upstaged England in a thrilling series in 2016. Their journey to the semifinals of the 2017 ICC Champions Trophy cemented Bangladesh’s status as a serious competitor in the 50-over format.

Redefining Test Cricket: A New Era 

Test cricket, long considered Bangladesh’s Achilles’ heel, witnessed a quiet revolution under Hathurusingha. Until his appointment, Bangladesh had managed to win just 4 of 83 Tests, with a win-loss ratio of 0.058. However, during his tenure, they won 6 out of 21 matches and drew 4, lifting their ratio to 0.545.

Their most notable victories came at home: Bangladesh defeated England in 2016 and followed it up with a historic win against Australia in 2017. In an inspiring away performance, the team also held Sri Lanka to a series draw in 2017, further establishing that they were no longer pushovers in the longest format.

 Individual Growth: The Rise of Bangladesh’s Stars 

Hathurusingha’s influence was not limited to collective achievements; it also spurred individual players to reach their potential. Tamim Iqbal was among the first to flourish under his guidance. From being inconsistent and heavily criticized, Tamim evolved into a dependable opener. Between 2015 and 2017, his ODI average surged from 26 to  46.38, 45.22, and 64.60 in successive years. His Test average, too, climbed from 37.29 in 2014 to over 50.

Similarly, Mushfiqur Rahim  grew into a formidable Test player. Before Hathurusingha’s tenure, Mushfiqur averaged 33.48 in Tests. That figure rose to 40.69 in 20 matches under Hathurusingha, as he recorded three centuries, including one in South Africa - the first by any Bangladeshi batsman in that region. His ODI numbers also improved significantly, with three hundreds across 50 matches.

Mahmudullah Riyad, another key player, credited Hathurusingha for his transformation from a lower-order all-rounder into a reliable middle-order batsman. "He gave me the confidence to bat higher up the order," Mahmudullah remarked. "The freedom he provided us allowed me to discover my potential as a middle-order player." This newfound confidence saw Mahmudullah play career-defining knocks in the 2015 World Cup  and 2017 Champions Trophy, turning him into one of Bangladesh’s most dependable batsmen.

Harnessing the Power of Youth 

Hathurusingha’s tenure also heralded the rise of a new generation of players. Under his leadership, Mustafizur Rahman burst onto the international stage, bamboozling batsmen with his unorthodox cutters. Meanwhile, the flair of Soumya Sarkar, the composure of Liton Das, and the all-around brilliance of Mehidy Hasan Miraz infused the team with youthful exuberance and depth.

Crucially, Hathurusingha dismantled the old mindset of relying on ageing players past their prime, making way for fresh talent. This blend of youth and experience proved vital in Bangladesh’s resurgence across formats.

Chandika Hathurusingha’s stint from 2014 to 2017 was not merely a successful chapter in Bangladesh cricket - it was a blueprint for transformation. He redefined the team’s approach, empowered individuals, and fostered a culture of discipline and professionalism. His tenure underscored that cricket is as much a mental game as it is a physical one, and that success lies in clarity of thought, trust in youth, and the courage to evolve.

The Hathurusingha era proved that Bangladesh can stand tall among cricket’s elite - not by imitating others but by crafting their own identity. His return now holds the promise of unfinished business - a chance to consolidate the gains made during his first tenure and build a team that not only competes but wins on the biggest stages.

For Bangladesh cricket, the lessons from Hathurusingha’s reign are clear: bold decisions, relentless professionalism, and an unwavering belief in the process will pave the way for sustained excellence. The story of Bangladesh’s transformation under Hathurusingha is not just one of victory—it is a testament to the power of change, both on the field and within.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Andrea Pirlo: The Architect of Elegance and Genius

When one speaks of elegance, class, and technical brilliance in football, Andrea Pirlo’s name inevitably rises to the forefront. Known as the Maestro, the Architect, or simply the Professor, Pirlo’s artistry on the pitch transcended the physicality of the sport, elevating it to an almost ethereal realm. His career, a masterclass in vision, technique, and composure, redefined the role of the deep-lying playmaker and etched his name into football’s pantheon of legends.

The Genesis of a Genius

Born on May 19, 1979, in Brescia, Italy, Pirlo’s journey into football was atypical. Unlike many footballers who emerge from humble beginnings, Pirlo’s affluent upbringing afforded him opportunities that nurtured his burgeoning talent. Enrolled in a paid school and introduced to football at an early age, his prodigious skill was evident from the start. His peers instinctively sought him out on the field, recognizing his uncanny ability to read the game and execute decisive passes.

Pirlo’s potential was quickly identified by his hometown club, Brescia Calcio, where he made his Serie A debut at just 16 years old under the tutelage of coach Mircea Lucescu. His immediate impact and maturity belied his age, and by the following season, he was an indispensable part of Brescia’s squad, helping them secure promotion to Serie A.

Trials and Transformations

In 1998, Inter Milan acquired Pirlo for over €2 million, a testament to his burgeoning reputation. Joining a squad that boasted luminaries like Ronaldo and Roberto Baggio, Pirlo’s future seemed destined for greatness. Yet, his time at Inter was fraught with challenges. Limited opportunities, managerial upheavals, and tactical misfits curtailed his progress. Loan spells at Reggina and a return to Brescia, however, proved pivotal. It was at Brescia under Carlo Mazzone that Pirlo was repositioned as a deep-lying playmaker, a role that would come to define his career.

The Milan Renaissance

Pirlo’s true ascension began in 2001 when AC Milan acquired him for €18 million. Initially a substitute, Pirlo’s fortunes changed under Carlo Ancelotti, who recognized the young midfielder’s potential to revolutionize the game. Positioned at the base of Milan’s midfield, flanked by the industrious Gennaro Gattuso and the versatile Clarence Seedorf, Pirlo became the fulcrum of one of football’s most celebrated midfields.

The 2002-2003 season marked the dawn of Pirlo’s golden era. His precise passing, unparalleled vision, and tactical intelligence orchestrated Milan’s attack, culminating in victories in the Coppa Italia and the UEFA Champions League. Over the next decade, Pirlo’s influence grew, guiding Milan to domestic and European glory, including the 2007 Champions League triumph—a poetic redemption against Liverpool following the heartbreak of 2005.

The World Cup Triumph

Pirlo’s brilliance extended to the international stage, where he was instrumental in Italy’s 2006 World Cup victory. From his sublime goal against Ghana to his four assists and ice-cold penalty in the final against France, Pirlo epitomized composure and class. His ability to dictate the tempo of games earned him the Bronze Ball, solidifying his status as one of the tournament’s standout performers.

A Juventus Renaissance

In 2011, Pirlo’s move to Juventus was seen by many as the twilight chapter of his career. Instead, it became a renaissance. Under Antonio Conte and later Massimiliano Allegri, Pirlo’s genius flourished. Leading Juventus to four consecutive Serie A titles, he shattered records and redefined expectations of an ageing playmaker. His contributions were instrumental in Juventus’s resurgence, including their run to the 2015 Champions League final.

The Pirlo Role: A Tactical Revolution

Andrea Pirlo’s tactical versatility enabled him to excel across various midfield roles, though he was predominantly deployed as a central midfielder, often in the role of a deep-lying playmaker, by both his club and national teams. His exceptional vision, passing precision, and ability to dictate the tempo of the game made him a unique asset. Widely regarded as one of the greatest players in his position, Pirlo’s name has been etched into the annals of football history, with players, managers, and pundits alike acknowledging him as one of the finest midfielders of all time. Throughout his illustrious career, he was not only seen as one of the best of his generation but also as one of Italy’s greatest-ever players.

Pirlo’s journey began in a more advanced role, where he was initially deployed as an attacking midfielder. On occasion, he even featured as a supporting striker. Though his talent was evident from a young age, drawing comparisons to the legendary Gianni Rivera, Pirlo’s early career was marked by struggles in these more forward positions. His lack of pace, compounded by the competition from more dynamic and athletic players, hindered his impact in these areas.

Recognizing his limitations in advanced roles, coaches such as Carlo Mazzone, Fatih Terim, and Carlo Ancelotti repositioned Pirlo to a deeper, more central role on the pitch. This tactical shift allowed Pirlo to leverage his innate creativity and intelligence. The deep-lying playmaker role suited his style perfectly, granting him the space and time necessary to orchestrate attacks from the back. It was in this capacity that Pirlo truly flourished, dictating the rhythm of the game with his trademark long passes and precise deliveries, creating opportunities from deep within the midfield. His ability to control the game from a seemingly defensive position, often operating just in front of the defence, was revolutionary—so much so that this role became colloquially known as "the Pirlo role," a testament to his mastery of the position.

In the twilight of his career, Pirlo's adaptability was again on display under the management of Massimiliano Allegri, who utilized him on the wing during his final season at Milan. This tactical tweak highlighted Pirlo's ability to provide accurate, cutting crosses, further demonstrating his multifaceted skill set. Thus, Pirlo's career is a reflection of both his technical brilliance and his tactical intelligence, which allowed him to transcend positional limitations and leave an indelible mark on the game.

Andrea Pirlo's playing style was characterized by a profound technical mastery that compensated for his lack of physical attributes such as pace, stamina, and defensive prowess. While not known for his work rate or tackling ability, Pirlo's composure on the ball became his defining trait. His touch, technique, balance, and elegance were second to none, allowing him to glide across the pitch with a fluidity that belied his lack of physical dynamism. His close control and dribbling, coupled with his flair and creativity, allowed him to navigate tight spaces, often using deft feints to beat opponents and retain possession. These attributes enabled him to create time and space for himself, facilitating his ability to orchestrate play and deliver incisive passes.

Despite his physical limitations, Pirlo's sharp footballing intelligence allowed him to anticipate plays and cover ground in midfield with remarkable efficiency. His ability to read the game and intercept passes demonstrated that speed of thought could often compensate for a lack of raw pace. As a playmaker, he was lauded for his exceptional vision and awareness, traits that enabled him to dictate the tempo of the game. His movement and positional sense were key to his success, as he effortlessly found pockets of space from which to launch attacks. Pirlo’s distribution was equally varied and precise, ranging from quick, short exchanges to more ambitious, risk-taking passes. His long-range passing, both on the ground and in the air, was particularly renowned, with his ability to execute pinpoint deliveries with either foot—a skill that set him apart as one of the best passers in football history. Even under pressure, Pirlo rarely relinquished possession, instead maintaining an unrivalled composure that allowed him to consistently thread passes through opposition lines. His ability to contribute to his team’s offensive play, whether through assists or goals, was a testament to his all-encompassing vision and technical acumen.

Beyond his general playmaking abilities, Pirlo was a dead-ball specialist, renowned for his precision in free-kicks and penalty-kicks. He was widely regarded as one of the best free-kick takers of his era, drawing admiration for his versatility and ability to both score and create chances from set pieces. Pirlo’s free-kick technique was an art form in itself, particularly his ability to curl shots with pinpoint accuracy from close range. This skill was honed through the rigorous study of Roberto Baggio during their time together at Brescia, with Baggio’s technique serving as a significant influence on Pirlo’s development. As a youngster, other iconic players such as Zico, Michel Platini, and Diego Maradona also shaped Pirlo’s approach to free-kick taking.

Pirlo’s mastery extended to long-range free kicks, where his unique technique—borrowed from the "knuckleball" free kicks of Juninho—enabled him to strike the ball with both power and swerve. This technique, which the Italian media later dubbed the maledetta ("accursed"), became one of Pirlo’s signature moves. His proficiency from set pieces was unmatched, with Pirlo sharing the record for the most free-kick goals in Serie A with Siniša Mihajlović. His ability to bend the ball around walls and past goalkeepers was a defining feature of his career, further cementing his reputation as a player capable of altering the course of a game with a single moment of brilliance.

Legacy of a Maestro

Pirlo’s retirement in 2017 marked the end of an era. His farewell match, the “Night of the Maestro,” celebrated a career that had redefined footballing artistry. Tributes from luminaries like Roberto Baggio, Marcello Lippi, and Gianluigi Buffon underscored his unique brilliance.

Pirlo’s legacy transcends statistics and trophies. He embodied the poetry of football, a player whose every touch was a brushstroke on the canvas of the beautiful game. From Brescia to Milan, Juventus to the global stage, Pirlo’s career is a testament to the enduring power of elegance, intelligence, and artistry in football. As Carlo Ancelotti aptly put it, “Pirlo spots a pass in a split-second that lesser players could spend a lifetime waiting to see.”

Thank You

Faisal Caesar  

A Tale of Redemption and Triumph: Allan Border’s Australia in the 1987 Cricket World Cup

It was a journey across continents, a pilgrimage undertaken not for mere sport but for a story that would transcend the boundaries of cricket itself. On that November afternoon in 1987, at the Eden Gardens in Calcutta, Allan Border's Australia crowned themselves world champions, etching a new chapter in cricketing history. The game’s denouement—a tense seven-run victory over England—was more than a contest of bat and ball; it was a symphony of resilience, strategy, and, ultimately, redemption.

The Semifinal Shadows

Just days earlier, cricket fans had witnessed a heartbreak of a different kind. In the semifinal against England, India’s skipper Kapil Dev, the hero of 1983, had fallen to an ill-judged slog sweep. His counterpart, Mike Gatting, dismissed it as a “silly” stroke, the kind that unravels well-laid plans. Yet irony has a sharp sense of humour. In the final, with England cruising at 135 for 2 in pursuit of 254, it was Gatting’s turn to err. His audacious reverse sweep off Border ended in ignominy, a top edge spiralling into the grateful gloves of Greg Dyer. The symmetry was poetic, the consequences catastrophic for England.

The Forgotten Gem

Australia’s 253 seemed precarious at one point, their innings floundering at 188 for 4 after 44 overs. But then came an unsung hero, Mike Veletta, whose unheralded brilliance transformed the game. His ferocious assault on Phil DeFreitas—plundering 45 runs off just 31 deliveries—breathed life into Australia’s total. In an era preceding T20’s audacious finishes, Veletta’s cameo was revolutionary, adding a crucial 65 runs in the last six overs. It was a knock that would fade into the annals of cricket but remained pivotal in that moment.

The Turning Tides

As dusk descended upon Eden Gardens, England, too, felt the creeping shadows of panic. Bill Athey’s run-out, orchestrated by a young Steve Waugh, set the tone. Paul Downton succumbed to a careless stroke, his downfall engineered by the unassuming Allan Border. Emburey, a seasoned campaigner, fell victim to another run-out, the chaos reflecting England’s unravelling mindset.

Border’s leadership was almost mystical in its efficacy. Every move he made seemed divinely inspired. His decision to reintroduce Craig McDermott for a brief two-over spell mid-innings slowed England’s charge, building pressure that would later prove insurmountable. His faith in Waugh, then a 22-year-old yet to blossom into his eventual greatness, was rewarded as the young bowler held his nerve in the death overs with unerring precision.

A Flicker of Hope, Extinguished

Even as England faltered, there was a moment when the scales threatened to tilt. DeFreitas, heralded as the heir to Ian Botham, unleashed a flurry of boundaries against McDermott—4, 6, 4—rekindling faint hopes. But where McDermott faltered, Waugh stood firm. His guile, concealed beneath his innocuous medium pace, outwitted the English lower order. When DeFreitas mistimed his aggression, Bruce Reid’s towering presence in the outfield snuffed out the flicker of rebellion. Waugh’s penultimate over conceded a mere two runs, leaving the impossible task of 17 runs from the final over.

McDermott, redeemed after his earlier punishment, delivered the coup de grâce. Foster and Small were no match for the task at hand. With every ball, the dream crumbled further, and Australia clinched a seven-run victory—an outcome that seemed improbable mere weeks before.

A New Dawn for Australia

Australia’s triumph was not just a victory; it was a statement. Only three years earlier, the team had been in disarray, reeling from the retirements of Greg Chappell, Dennis Lillee, and Rod Marsh. Border had inherited a team in shambles, burdened with the weight of rebuilding. The World Cup victory symbolized the culmination of that arduous journey, a triumph of grit and character over despair.

As Border lifted the trophy, his typically stoic visage softened into a smile—a rare, luminous expression that captured the essence of what his team had achieved. It was not merely the culmination of a tournament but a vindication of a captain’s belief in his team, a redemption arc that echoed far beyond the boundaries of cricket.

In that moment, it was clear: some journeys are worth crossing the world for, not for the destination alone, but for the stories that unfold along the way.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

The Wankhede Heartbreak: India’s Fall in the World Cup Semifinal

The 1987 Cricket World Cup semifinal between India and England at Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai was more than just a cricket match—it was a confluence of anticipation, strategy, and high-stakes drama. Defending champions India entered the fray as favourites, buoyed by an exceptional run in the tournament, including a commanding chase against New Zealand at Nagpur. England, while formidable, carried the psychological baggage of two losses to Pakistan and a visible vulnerability against quality spin bowling.

Yet, cricket’s beauty lies in its unpredictability. In a contest defined by decisive moments, Graham Gooch’s tactical brilliance with the bat and India’s lapses under pressure turned what seemed a destined triumph into a tale of heartbreak.

England's First Innings: The Masterclass of Graham Gooch

Kapil Dev’s decision to field first on a true surface under clear skies seemed astute, especially with their ace spinner Maninder Singh in prime form. Early breakthroughs vindicated the choice momentarily. Tim Robinson fell to a classic piece of flight and guile from Maninder, while Bill Athey struggled against the relentless Indian attack before edging behind.

However, Gooch, England’s linchpin, was prepared for this day. His meticulous preparation to counter India’s spinners with the sweep shot transformed the narrative. With deliberate precision, he swept both Maninder and Ravi Shastri to every corner of the leg side, rendering their variations ineffective. The innings, anchored by Gooch’s 136-ball 115, was a clinic in resilience and execution. Mike Gatting, England’s captain, complimented him with aggressive strokes and deft placements, adding 117 in partnership to tilt the match firmly in England’s favour.

India’s bowlers toiled, with occasional successes from Maninder and Kapil in the latter overs, but Allan Lamb’s dynamic 29-ball 32 ensured England finished with a daunting 254 for 5. The target was challenging but not insurmountable, especially for a team as resourceful as India.

India’s Chase: From Hope to Despair

The stage was set for Sunil Gavaskar to script a memorable farewell on his home ground. Yet, destiny had other plans. A loose defensive stroke saw him bowled for a mere five, silencing the Wankhede crowd. Navjot Singh Sidhu and Krishnamachari Srikkanth steadied the innings with contrasting styles, but England’s bowlers, led by Neil Foster and Phil DeFreitas, kept the pressure on.

Mohammad Azharuddin and Chandrakant Pandit provided a glimmer of hope, blending elegance with urgency. Azhar’s artistry through the off-side and Pandit’s audacious strokeplay brought India closer. When Kapil Dev walked in and unleashed a series of commanding strokes, belief surged. However, his departure at a critical juncture underscored the fragility of India’s middle-order depth.

Azhar continued to fight valiantly, reaching a fluent fifty, but his untimely dismissal—attempting an ill-advised paddle sweep—was a turning point. With the lower order failing to contribute significantly, the burden fell squarely on Ravi Shastri. His calculated aggression momentarily rekindled hope, but an ill-fated mistimed shot marked the end of India’s aspirations. The defending champions folded for 219, falling short by 35 runs.

 The Aftermath: Lessons in Triumph and Despair

England’s victory was a triumph of meticulous preparation and unyielding execution. Gooch’s calculated assault on India’s spin arsenal showcased the value of strategic foresight, while Gatting’s captaincy decisions were precise and effective. For India, the loss was a stark reminder of cricket’s unforgiving nature. Their over-reliance on key players and failure to adapt under pressure proved costly.

In the grander scheme, the match epitomized the essence of cricket—a sport where brilliance and heartbreak coexist, where glory hinges on moments seized and mistakes exploited. For Indian fans, the semi-final at Wankhede remains a bittersweet memory, a tale of what could have been in the annals of World Cup history.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar  

A Tale of What Could Have Been: Pakistan vs. Australia, 1987 World Cup Semifinal

Cricket, often described as a game of glorious uncertainties, seldom delivers heartbreak with such dramatic flair as it did in the 1987 World Cup semi-final between Pakistan and Australia. The clash at Lahore's Gaddafi Stadium unfolded as a saga of resilience, tactical gambles, and missed opportunities, culminating in a result that dashed the dreams of an expectant nation.

Prelude to a Dream

This was meant to be Imran Khan’s crowning moment, the perfect farewell on home soil. The charismatic all-rounder had been the heartbeat of Pakistan's cricketing resurgence, leading his team to five consecutive victories in the tournament. The semi-final was not just another game; it was a stage set for destiny. The Lahore crowd, carrying banners emblazoned with “IMRAN WE’LL MISS YOU,” was ready to witness their hero script the fairy tale ending they so deeply craved.

On the other hand, Australia entered as the underdog. Their campaign had been scrappy, marked by narrow victories over India and New Zealand. Yet, their gritty captain, Allan Border, and a core of dependable players embodied the fighting spirit that made them dangerous.

A Game of Momentum Swings

Choosing to bat first, Australia began with a solid platform. Geoff Marsh and David Boon combined for a steady 73-run opening stand, but Marsh’s run-out due to a sharp direct hit from Saleem Malik disrupted their rhythm. Dean Jones, with his characteristic audacity, kept the scoreboard ticking, even surviving a contentious LBW decision from umpire Dickie Bird that could have swung the game Pakistan’s way.

The innings gathered pace as partnerships flourished. Border’s calm head and Mike Veletta’s aggression pushed the total upwards. A flurry of wickets—including two brilliant direct hits—seemed to tilt the balance towards Pakistan. Yet, the lower-order resilience of Steve Waugh and Tim May proved pivotal. Waugh’s blitz in the final over against Saleem Jaffar turned a manageable target into a formidable 267. The 18 runs conceded in that over loomed large over the game, a cruel reminder of the margin for error in crunch moments.

The Chase: Hope and Despair

Pakistan’s reply began on a disastrous note. Rameez Raja was run out in the first over, and when Saleem Malik and Mansoor Akhtar followed cheaply, the hopes of the home crowd dimmed. But then, Imran Khan and Javed Miandad, veterans of countless battles, took the stage. Their contrasting styles—Imran’s flamboyant aggression and Miandad’s unyielding determination—complemented each other perfectly as they rebuilt the innings.

The partnership, worth 112 runs, infused life into the chase. Imran’s commanding presence and Miandad’s crafty manoeuvring of the fielders ignited dreams of an improbable victory. Yet, just as the tide seemed to favour Pakistan, a reckless slog off Allan Border’s part-time spin ended Imran’s sublime innings. It was a shot unworthy of the occasion, leaving Miandad to shoulder the burden of the chase alone.

The Final Act

Miandad soldiered on, crafting a masterful 70, but wickets tumbled around him. Wasim Akram’s cameo injected hope, but his dismissal exposed Pakistan’s fragile tail. The task fell to Abdul Qadir and Saleem Jaffar, who ran valiantly and swung desperately. In the end, the target proved insurmountable. Craig McDermott’s fiery spell, culminating in a five-wicket haul, sealed Pakistan’s fate, and with it, the dreams of millions.

A Post-Mortem of Missed Chances

This match, more than any other in the tournament, was defined by the “what-ifs.” What if Saleem Jaffar had held his nerve in the final over? What if Imran had trusted Abdul Qadir or Malik instead? What if Miandad had found a more reliable partner in the lower order? Cricket, however, offers no solace in hypotheticals.

For Imran Khan, this was a bitter pill to swallow. The image of him walking off the field, acknowledging the crowd’s applause, was a poignant reminder of how close he had come to a fairytale ending. Yet, the seeds of Pakistan’s ultimate redemption—four years later in Melbourne—were sown in this heartbreak.

Legacy of a Classic

This semi-final was not merely a cricket match; it was a narrative of human endeavour and fallibility. Australia’s triumph was a testament to their grit and determination, setting the stage for their ascendancy in world cricket. For Pakistan, it was a lesson in the cruel arithmetic of sport, where moments of brilliance can be undone by lapses in execution

Gaddafi Stadium’s roars turned into sighs, and the banners proclaiming “WORLD CUP IS OURS” were folded away. But the memories of this dramatic contest endure, a tale of hope, heartbreak, and the indomitable spirit of cricket.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

 

A Nail-Biting Thriller: Pakistan vs. West Indies, 1987 World Cup

The 1987 Cricket World Cup bore witness to some unforgettable encounters, but the clash between Pakistan and West Indies in Lahore stands out as a gripping spectacle of cricketing drama and sportsmanship. Both teams entered the game with contrasting fortunes: Pakistan eager to consolidate their position, and West Indies desperate to revive their campaign after an early loss to England. What unfolded was a tale of resilience, nerves, and an unforgettable gesture of integrity.

A Promising Start for West Indies

The West Indies began on a confident note. Desmond Haynes and debutant Phil Simmons provided a solid foundation, with Simmons crafting a brisk half-century. At 91 for 1, the Caribbean side seemed poised for a commanding total. However, the introduction of Saleem Jaffar changed the equation. With three quick wickets, Jaffar disrupted the middle order, leaving the West Indies reeling.

Enter Viv Richards. The maestro’s 52-ball 51 brought much-needed acceleration. His commanding presence steadied the innings until Imran Khan, Pakistan’s talismanic captain, returned to the attack. Imran’s spell (4 for 37) dismantled the tail, and West Indies were bowled out for a modest 216 in 49.3 overs. Jaffar (3 for 30) and Wasim Akram (2 for 45) provided stellar support.

The Chase: A Story of Resolve

Pakistan’s reply began shakily. At 110 for 5, the home side’s hopes seemed to be slipping away. It was at this juncture that wicketkeeper-batsman Saleem Yousuf joined Imran Khan. Yousuf, often overshadowed by his more illustrious teammates, showcased his ability with a counterattacking display. His audacious stroke play rattled the West Indies bowlers and exploited fielding lapses, as the visitors spilled multiple chances under pressure.

Imran played the anchor role, rotating the strike to allow Yousuf to flourish. Together, they revived Pakistan’s innings, but Courtney Walsh’s disciplined bowling ended their partnership. Imran departed with 15 runs still required. Yousuf, battling valiantly, fell shortly after, leaving the tail to secure the final runs.

The Final Over: A Test of Nerves

With 14 runs needed off the last over, Walsh, who had endured heartbreak against England days earlier, was entrusted with the ball. Abdul Qadir and Saleem Jaffar were Pakistan’s last hopes at the crease.

The drama unfolded ball by ball. A single from Qadir followed by another scrambled run from Jaffar left 12 required off four deliveries. Then, in a moment of brilliance, Qadir danced down the pitch and lofted Walsh over long-off for a six. The Gaddafi Stadium erupted, and the equation shifted to four runs off two balls.

Qadir’s clever placement for two runs brought Pakistan within striking distance. But as Walsh prepared to deliver the final ball, a moment of extraordinary sportsmanship stunned everyone. Noticing Jaffar backing up too far, Walsh stopped mid-run and opted not to dislodge the bails. Instead, he issued a warning, earning admiration and applause from both players and spectators.

With two needed off the last ball, Walsh delivered a straight yorker. Qadir squeezed it past a drawn-in third man, and the batsmen ran two to seal a famous win for Pakistan.

The Aftermath: A Lesson in Integrity

The victory bolstered Pakistan’s semi-final hopes and left the West Indies’ campaign in jeopardy. However, it was Walsh’s act of sportsmanship that transcended the game. Despite the heartbreak, his decision to warn rather than appeal against Jaffar for backing up became a defining moment of cricketing ethics.

Saleem Jaffar later remarked, “The old cricketers had great character and played with integrity. Walsh’s gesture was a reminder of the spirit in which the game should be played.”

For Pakistan, the win exemplified their resilience under pressure. For the West Indies, it was a bittersweet chapter in a tournament that slipped away. Above all, this match remains etched in cricketing lore as a perfect blend of competition and camaraderie, where the game’s spirit shone as brightly as its skills.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar  

The Day Viv Richards Reigned Supreme: A Tale of Unrelenting Power

Once upon a time, the cricketing world trembled at the sight of a figure whose mere presence on the field could alter the course of a match. This figure, none other than the indomitable Viv Richards, wielded his bat like a mace, striking fear into the hearts of bowlers across the globe. On this fateful day, the West Indian legend unleashed a devastating display of power that would etch itself into the annals of cricket history.

Sri Lanka, under the captaincy of Duleep Mendis, came into the match with a respectable bowling attack. Vinothen John, Ravi Ratnayeke, Don Anurasiri, and Ashantha de Mel formed the backbone of their bowling unit, supported by the part-time options of Aravinda de Silva, Arjuna Ranatunga, and Asanka Gurusinha. Though the Sri Lankan side boasted a solid batting lineup, they were still the underdogs in the face of a West Indian team led by Richards, a squad brimming with talent and dominance.

Mendis’ decision to put the West Indies into bat was a gamble, one that appeared to backfire early on. John and Ratnayeke bowled with discipline, restricting the West Indian openers. Ratnayeke struck first, clean-bowling Carlisle Best, and then claimed the wicket of Richie Richardson, who edged his first ball to Brendon Kuruppu. At 45 for 2, with Ratnayeke on a hat-trick, Sri Lanka were firmly in control, and the West Indies seemed rattled.

The King Takes Over 

But then, from the shadows of uncertainty, emerged the man who would change the course of the game. Viv Richards, his biceps rippling beneath his shirt, chewed gum with an intensity that seemed to signal the beginning of something ominous. His gaze, as Sunil Gavaskar once remarked, conveyed the message: “What am I doing here among children? I should be among men.”* Richards was not just a batsman; he was a force of nature.

He began cautiously, playing a couple of elegant cover drives, before quickly accelerating. Desmond Haynes, his opening partner, also found his rhythm, and the runs began to flow. Richards’ fifty came up off 62 balls, but this was merely the calm before the storm. The first signs of his impending onslaught came when Aravinda de Silva bowled a delivery aimed at leg stump. Richards, ever the master of improvisation, moved outside leg and dispatched the ball through extra cover with such ferocity that the fielders barely moved. It was the first six of the innings, and the warning signs were clear.

As the game progressed, Richards' destructive power became evident. His hundred came off 98 balls, with the second fifty coming in just 35 balls—a blistering pace that left the Sri Lankan bowlers helpless. With Gus Logie content to play the role of a supporting act, Richards took full control. His shots were a masterclass in power and timing, with extra-cover, square-leg, and mid-wicket becoming the favoured targets. The ball flew over the boundary with ease, and when it didn’t, it raced to the fence so quickly that the fielders had no time to react.

The Carnage

At this point, the West Indies had surpassed Pakistan’s previous record of 338 for five, set just four years earlier. Richards then surpassed Kapil Dev’s iconic 175 not out, with a towering straight six that further cemented his place in cricketing folklore. The Sri Lankan bowlers, particularly de Mel, were helpless in the face of this onslaught. De Mel, who had been a key figure in the previous World Cup, finished with figures of 1 for 97 from his ten overs, a record for the worst economy rate in World Cup history for a bowler who had bowled ten or more overs.

Richards’ assault continued until, with his score at 181, he mishit a delivery from de Mel. As his left hand came off the bat, Roshan Mahanama, running from backward point to third man, pulled off an astonishing catch that would go down in history. Richards’ innings, which included 16 fours and seven sixes, had come to an end, but by then, the damage was done. The West Indies were on 343, and they would go on to finish with a monumental 360 for 4 in their allotted 50 overs.

The Sri Lankan response, though valiant, was never truly a contest. Mahanama, in particular, threatened to take the fight to the West Indies, striking three boundaries off the first three balls he faced. However, his dismissal, caught off Walsh, was the beginning of the end. Sri Lanka’s middle order, led by Gurusinha and Ranatunga, could only delay the inevitable. Gurusinha’s 36 off 108 balls was a brave effort, but it lacked the urgency needed to chase down such a daunting target. Sri Lanka, despite a valiant fifty from Ranatunga and some fine strokes from Mendis, were never in the hunt. The West Indies triumphed by 191 runs, with Richards’ brilliance ensuring that the result was never in doubt.

In the end, this match was not just a victory for the West Indies, but a testament to the raw, unbridled power of Viv Richards. It was a performance that transcended the boundaries of cricket, a reminder that in the right hands, a bat could become a weapon capable of destruction on a scale rarely seen. The Sri Lankans, despite their best efforts, were left to wonder what might have been had they been able to contain the beast that was Richards on that unforgettable day.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

The Pakistan-England Thriller At Rawalpindi in 1987 Cricket World Cup : A Clash of Grit, Spin, and Strategy

Throughout the 1980s, England faced a rollercoaster of cricketing emotions. They challenged Australia head-on, traded blows with India, and suffered relentless hammerings from the West Indies' fearsome pace attack. Their encounters with Pakistan, however, carried a unique tension. The infamous Shakoor Rana incident symbolized their fraught relationship, and the mystique of Abdul Qadir, Pakistan’s spin wizard, added another layer of torment for the Englishmen.

Qadir’s mastery over England was legendary. His unorthodox leg-spin baffled even seasoned batters. Vic Marks summed it up best: “Good Lord, he’s bowled me a full-toss. Where shall I smash it? Hang on it’s a low full-toss. Not to worry. Maybe it’s a half-volley. Oh no, it’s a length ball and I’m groping hopelessly.” Qadir’s dominance against England was a critical factor whenever the two teams met, and this match at Rawalpindi was no exception.

A Muddy Start and a Defiant Pakistan

Pakistan, entering the 1987 World Cup as one of the favourites, had already faced a stiff challenge from Sri Lanka in their opening match. England, on the other hand, came off a thrilling victory against the West Indies at Gujranwala, courtesy of Allan Lamb’s heroics. The stakes were high as the two teams clashed in Rawalpindi for Pool A supremacy.

Rain on the scheduled day of play turned the outfield into what Wisden aptly described as a “mudfield.” When play resumed on the reserve day, Mike Gatting’s decision to field first seemed justified as England’s fielders struck early. Chris Broad’s sharp fielding ran out Rameez Raja, putting Pakistan on the back foot. But the seasoned duo of Saleem Malik and Javed Miandad steadied the ship, countering England’s disciplined bowling with grit and precision.

DeFreitas’s double breakthrough, dismissing Miandad and Malik in quick succession, threatened to derail Pakistan’s innings. However, Ijaz Ahmed and a food-poisoned Imran Khan anchored the middle order with a crucial 79-run partnership. Imran’s resilience, despite his illness, allowed Ijaz to accelerate, and Qadir’s late cameo alongside Saleem Yousuf propelled Pakistan to a respectable 239 for 7.

England’s Response and Qadir’s Magic

 Chasing 240, England’s openers began cautiously, adding 52 runs before Qadir’s artistry dismantled Graham Gooch’s defence. Broad’s dismissal by Tauseef Ahmed and Qadir’s removal of Tim Robinson further tightened Pakistan’s grip. Gatting’s brisk 43 from 47 balls kept England in the hunt, but his dismissal left the visitors needing 34 from 24 balls with Lamb and Derek Pringle at the crease.

 Qadir, entrusted with the ball during the critical phase, turned the game on its head. Lamb, England’s hero against the West Indies, fell leg-before to Qadir’s guile. A disastrous mix-up between Emburey and Pringle led to Emburey’s run out. Paul Downton’s edge off Qadir was brilliantly caught by Saleem Yousuf, marking a dramatic collapse as Qadir claimed three wickets in the span of one run.

England’s slim hopes were extinguished by further run-outs of Pringle and Foster, leaving Gladstone Small—a bowler with no batting pretensions—to face the music. Saleem Jaffar delivered the final blow, trapping Small leg-before to seal Pakistan’s 18-run victory.

A Triumph of Spin and Fielding

This match epitomized Pakistan’s reliance on spin and strategic fielding. Abdul Qadir’s spell, coupled with sharp fielding and tactical captaincy, turned a potentially close contest into a decisive victory. His ability to outfox England’s batters highlighted their longstanding vulnerability against high-quality spin.

For England, the loss underscored the perils of poor running between the wickets and the inability to counter spin effectively. Despite moments of brilliance from Gatting and Lamb, their middle and lower order crumbled under pressure, handing Pakistan a crucial win.

The Rawalpindi encounter remains a testament to the impact of spin and fielding in limited-overs cricket. Abdul Qadir’s wizardry and Pakistan’s strategic acumen prevailed, reaffirming their status as tournament favourites while exposing England’s frailties on the subcontinental stage.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

A Critical Look at the Relationship Between Bangladesh Cricket and the Press: A Call for Change

 In the ongoing cricket series between Bangladesh and South Africa, a significant controversy has emerged regarding the Bangladesh team’s interaction with the media. According to Prothom Alo, one of Bangladesh’s most popular yet controversial newspapers, the Bangladesh cricket team, under the leadership of head coach Chandika Hathurusingha, has refused to grant interviews to Bangladeshi journalists who travelled to South Africa to cover the series. The team’s practice sessions were held indoors, behind an iron gate, and journalists were denied access. This decision, though controversial, has sparked a deeper conversation about the dynamics between the Bangladesh cricket team and the local sports media.

The Strained Relationship Between Hathurusingha and Local Journalists

Since his appointment as head coach in 2014, Chandika Hathurusingha has faced consistent criticism from a faction of Bangladesh’s sports journalists. Despite his success in transforming the team from a state of mediocrity to a competitive force in international cricket, some journalists have persistently painted him as an "autocrat" and "rude" figure. However, players like Shakib Al Hasan, Mahmudullah Riyad, and Tamim Iqbal have repeatedly expressed their satisfaction with Hathurusingha’s methods and leadership.

The criticism levelled against Hathurusingha often seems to be more personal than professional, rooted in a longstanding vendetta. For a coach to bring out the best in his players, a strict approach to discipline and ethics is often necessary, and if this so-called "autocratic" style results in positive outcomes for the team, it should be seen as a strength rather than a flaw. Hathurusingha’s preference for privacy and consultation with only the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) and team management should not be viewed as a flaw, but rather as a deliberate strategy to maintain focus and avoid unnecessary distractions.

The Role of the Press: Superiority Complex and the Misuse of Influence

The issue at hand is not merely about Hathurusingha’s reluctance to engage with the media, but the broader attitude that some of Bangladesh’s sports journalists bring to their work. A certain section of the media seems to believe that they are entitled to access and influence, treating their relationship with players and officials as one of superiority. When coaches or players choose to withhold comments or deny access, these journalists often retaliate by twisting statements or publishing negative stories, creating a toxic atmosphere around the team.

This phenomenon is not new. The case of Nazmul Hassan, the BCB president, is a prime example. His comments about Mushfiqur Rahim were misinterpreted and twisted, leading to widespread outrage among fans. Similarly, when players like Soumya Sarkar or Liton Das choose to avoid certain journalists, they are often subjected to public criticism and their reputations are undermined. This behaviour not only harms the individuals involved but also damages the overall image of Bangladesh cricket.

One must ask: what is the real contribution of these journalists to Bangladesh cricket? Beyond sensationalizing stories and spreading misinformation, what positive impact have they had on the sport? While there are certainly competent and knowledgeable sports journalists in Bangladesh, a disturbing trend has emerged where less-skilled individuals with a limited understanding of the game have gained prominence in the media landscape. This has led to a dilution of the quality of sports journalism in the country.

The Mashrafe Mortaza Conundrum: Exploiting Personal Relationships for Professional Gain?

A particularly troubling aspect of this media-player dynamic is the relationship between some journalists and key players, notably Mashrafe Mortaza, one of Bangladesh’s most beloved cricketers. The "bromance" between Mashrafe and certain journalists has given rise to a harmful syndicate that undermines the integrity of the sport. These journalists, using their personal relationships with Mashrafe, have gained easy access to the team and have used this access to create unnecessary hype and stir controversy.

This unhealthy influence has led to the creation of sensationalized stories and conspiracies, which only serve to confuse and divide the fanbase. It raises the question: is Mashrafe using these journalists for his own benefit? Is he seeking to manipulate public perception and position himself as a hero by vilifying others? This manipulation of the media for personal gain is detrimental to the health of Bangladesh cricket and must be addressed.

The Need for Change: A Call for BCB’s Intervention

It is high time that the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) takes a firm stance against the negative influence of certain journalists. A code of conduct needs to be established, one that ensures that access to players and officials is controlled and that journalists are held accountable for their actions. The BCB must prioritize the welfare of the team and the sport over the interests of a select few journalists who seek to exploit their access for personal or professional gain.

While journalism is a noble and challenging profession, it must be practised with integrity and responsibility. The current state of sports journalism in Bangladesh, with its emphasis on sensationalism and personal vendettas, is not only disgraceful but also harmful to the development of the sport. The constant provocation and manipulation of players and coaches, as seen with former coaches like Heath Streak and Thilan Samaraweera, have resulted in their premature departure from the team.

Conclusion: A Call for a More Responsible Media

Bangladesh cricket, its players, and its fans deserve better. The BCB must act swiftly to address the growing issue of negative media influence and ensure that the focus remains on the game, not on personal rivalries or sensationalist stories. The media’s role should be to support and uplift the sport, not to tear it down with misinformation and personal agendas. For the sake of Bangladesh cricket, it is crucial that the BCB enforces stricter guidelines on media access and ensures that the voices of those who truly understand the game and its nuances are the ones that are heard.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Tale of Heroics and Heartbreak: Dave Houghton’s Masterclass and Martin Crowe’s Magic

It was late afternoon on October 10, 1987. The ball hung in the air for what seemed like an eternity. Dave Houghton’s eyes followed its arc, willing it to carry just a little further. The fate of an extraordinary contest rested on that streak of red leather, suspended in time and tension.

The Lal Bahadur Shastri Stadium in Hyderabad had drawn a sizeable crowd, lured not by marquee teams but by the magnetism of the Reliance World Cup. The unsung New Zealand side faced a Zimbabwe team yet to achieve Test status, and yet, the unfolding drama transcended reputations. For those in attendance, this match became a cherished chapter in cricketing folklore.

By the halfway mark of Zimbabwe’s chase, the match adhered to the expected script. New Zealand had posted a competitive 242, built on the measured half-centuries of makeshift opener Martin Snedden and the ever-elegant Martin Crowe. John Traicos, the veteran off-spinner, bowled with precision, conceding a mere 28 runs in his 10 overs. Zimbabwe’s response, however, began in disarray. At 104 for 7, with only Andy Pycroft showing resistance apart from the audacious Houghton, the result seemed inevitable.

Then, the script flipped. Ian Butchart, stoic and unyielding, refused to relinquish his wicket. At the other end, Houghton batted as though possessed, conjuring strokes that bordered on the ethereal. Boundaries flowed with effortless grace to all corners of the ground, punctuated by towering sixes that electrified the crowd. The wicketkeeper-batsman’s innings was a masterclass in controlled aggression, blending technical brilliance with raw power. The Kiwis, so assured moments earlier, began to unravel. Fielding lapses emerged, gaps appeared, and Houghton exploited them with surgical precision.

The partnership between Houghton and Butchart blossomed into a remarkable 117-run stand, transforming despair into hope. The equation narrowed: 22 runs needed from 21 balls. Snedden, returning to bowl, faced a visibly fatigued yet determined Houghton. Spotting the mid-on fielder inside the circle, Houghton seized the moment. With both feet airborne, he unleashed a mighty swing. The ball soared high, seemingly destined to clear the boundary.

Thousands of eyes followed its arc toward the fence. But one pair of eyes remained unwavering—those of Martin Crowe. The Kiwi stalwart, a paragon of athleticism and focus, turned and sprinted toward the long-on boundary. His strides were purposeful, his gaze fixed on the ball. As it threatened to elude him, Crowe launched into a full-stretch dive. Time seemed to freeze as his outstretched hands clasped the ball. Against all odds, it stuck. Crowe tumbled and rolled, emerging triumphant with the red cherry still firmly clutched.

It was a moment of cricketing transcendence. Houghton’s miraculous innings—an epic 142 off 137 balls adorned with 13 fours and 6 sixes—had been extinguished by an equally miraculous catch. Disbelief hung in the air. Houghton, stunned, walked back in silence, while Crowe, perhaps equally astonished, marvelled at his own feat. The stadium reverberated with a mix of awe and heartbreak as Zimbabwe’s hero departed.

In the end, Zimbabwe fell agonizingly short, losing by just three runs. Yet, this match was far more than a narrow defeat for the minnows. It was a testament to cricket’s unpredictable beauty, where individual brilliance and collective resilience can momentarily rewrite destiny. Houghton’s innings and Crowe’s catch remain immortalized, a poignant reminder that in cricket, as in life, the journey often outshines the destination.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Sri Lanka: The Decade-Breaking Lions

In the annals of Test cricket, few teams have the knack for disrupting dominance quite like Sri Lanka. In 1995, they ended Pakistan’s decade-long home supremacy, and in 2024, history repeated itself. Pakistan’s fortress, carefully guarded over ten years, has been breached once again by the resilient Lankan Lions. This is no coincidence—it is a testament to Sri Lanka’s ability to rise against the odds, even when branded as underdogs. 

For Sri Lanka, this victory is more than just a series win; it is a resurrection. Once teetering on the brink of irrelevance in the Test arena, this triumph marks a significant turning point. It is a reminder that transitions, however daunting, can lead to triumph with perseverance and faith. 

A Victory Against the Odds 

Sri Lanka entered the series against Pakistan as the definitive underdogs. Their Test side, long overshadowed by the retirement of legends and plagued by inconsistency, was seen by many as a team in decline. Yet, cricket has a way of rewarding faith, and for those who believed in the Lankan Lions, this series was a vindication. 

This victory was not merely a result of skill but also of sheer will. The Lankan players, coaches, and fans deserve every accolade for pulling off a series win that seemed improbable at the outset. Their journey from near obscurity to conquering a formidable opponent on foreign soil is nothing short of inspiring. 

Pakistan: A Tale of What Could Have Been 

For Pakistan, this series will be remembered as an opportunity lost. Their batting, a traditional stronghold, faltered when it mattered most. In both Tests, moments of brilliance were overshadowed by collective lapses, leaving Sarfraz Ahmed’s side with more questions than answers. 

The dressing room mood will undoubtedly be sombre. For Sarfraz, a captain who gave everything on the field, this defeat will be hard to digest. Yet, defeats often serve as the harshest yet most valuable teachers. Pakistan must now reflect on their mistakes—not to dwell on them, but to learn and rebuild. 

Drama in Abu Dhabi: A Tale of Two Collapses 

The first Test in Abu Dhabi was a slow burner, with attritional cricket dominating the first four days. The final day, however, was a different story. Wickets tumbled in a frenzy, transforming a sedate match into a nail-biter. Yasir Shah triggered a Sri Lankan collapse, only for Pakistan to crumble spectacularly while chasing a modest target of 136. 

The drama was quintessentially Pakistani—unpredictable, thrilling, and nerve-wracking. It was less about Rangana Herath’s brilliance and more about Pakistan’s flair for the unexpected. The joy of Sri Lankan players and fans was matched by the collective sigh of disbelief from Pakistan supporters. 

Dubai: A Rollercoaster of Emotions 

The second Test in Dubai followed a similar script of unpredictability. After conceding a massive 220-run deficit in the first innings, Pakistan’s bowlers, led by Wahab Riaz and Yasir Shah, mounted a stunning comeback. Haris Sohail, the surprise package, joined the fray, and Sri Lanka were bundled out for a mere 96 in their second innings. 

Under the lights, Wahab Riaz delivered a spell of hostile pace bowling that sent chills down the spine. Yasir Shah complemented him with relentless accuracy, while Haris Sohail added crucial breakthroughs. Suddenly, a match that seemed lost became a 50-50 contest. 

Chasing 317, Pakistan found themselves at 52 for 5, staring at yet another collapse. But Asad Shafiq and Sarfraz Ahmed had other plans. Their partnership revived hope, turning the chase into a dramatic spectacle. Yet, as the dust settled, it was Sri Lanka who emerged victorious, celebrating a hard-fought series win. 

The Unpredictable Gift of Pakistan Cricket 

While Sri Lanka deservedly claimed the series, Pakistan’s unpredictable nature made it unforgettable. Their ability to oscillate between brilliance and chaos is both their greatest strength and weakness. It is this unpredictability that keeps fans glued to the screen, ensuring that no match involving Pakistan is ever devoid of drama. 

In an era where Test cricket often struggles for relevance, Pakistan’s flair for the dramatic is a blessing. Their penchant for making the simple seem impossible and the impossible seem achievable ensures that the format retains its allure. 

Lessons and Legacies 

For Sri Lanka, this series is a stepping stone to a brighter future. It should instil confidence in a team that has often doubted itself. For Pakistan, it is a wake-up call—a reminder that dominance, however long, is fragile without consistent performances. 

As the cricketing world celebrates this thrilling series, it is a moment to reflect on the beauty of Test cricket. In an age dominated by commercial interests, this series was a testament to the enduring charm of the longest format. 

Sri Lanka’s victory is a reminder that underdogs can roar, transitions can lead to triumph, and Test cricket, despite its challenges, remains the pinnacle of the sport.  

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Duel of Grit and Glory: England's Thrilling Triumph Over West Indies in the 1987 World Cup

The Indian subcontinent buzzed with excitement and anticipation as it prepared to host the World Cup for the first time, breaking free from England’s traditional grasp on the tournament. In the second game of the 1987 Reliance World Cup, England faced the mighty West Indies, former champions with a reputation for dominance.

While most teams tailored their strategies to the spin-friendly surfaces of the subcontinent, England defied convention. They opted for a pace-heavy attack featuring Phil DeFreitas, Neil Foster, Gladstone Small, and Derek Pringle, supported by the lone off-spinner, John Emburey. This decision would come under scrutiny, especially as the advantages of a balanced bowling attack became evident against the West Indies.

The West Indies’ innings began with early setbacks as Carlisle Best and Desmond Haynes departed cheaply. However, Viv Richards and Richie Richardson steadied the ship, combining sharp running between the wickets with elegant boundary strokes. It was Foster who broke the partnership, dismissing both Richards and Richardson in quick succession. Emburey was introduced soon after, and though he remained wicketless, his precision and control stifled the West Indies’ scoring rate. Conceding just 22 runs from his 10 overs, including a maiden, Emburey proved to be a quiet but significant thorn in the West Indian batting lineup.

With Emburey out of the attack, the West Indies found their rhythm. Jeff Dujon and Gus Logie unleashed a counterattack, dismantling the English pacers, particularly Pringle and Foster. Dujon’s run-out momentarily stemmed the flow of runs, but Roger Harper took up the mantle, smashing 22 off Pringle’s final over, the penultimate of the innings. Logie fell for a brisk 41-ball 49, and Harper’s cameo of 24 from 10 balls ended when Small rattled his stumps. From a modest 151 for 4 at the 40-over mark, the West Indies accelerated to a formidable 243 for 7, plundering 92 runs in the final 10 overs.

Chasing 244 was always going to be a challenge for England, especially without Ian Botham. Their task was further complicated by the fiery West Indian pace trio of Patrick Patterson, Courtney Walsh, and Winston Benjamin, complemented by the spin of Harper and Carl Hooper.

England’s innings began poorly, with Chris Broad edging Walsh to wicketkeeper Dujon and Tim Robinson’s ill-fated run-out adding to the early woes. Mike Gatting and Graham Gooch offered brief resistance, adding 58 runs in nine overs, but Hooper’s off-breaks proved too clever for them. Once the duo departed, England’s middle order crumbled under pressure.

Allan Lamb stood as the lone beacon of hope, crafting a gritty knock while wickets tumbled around him. He found a brief ally in Pringle, but Hooper’s sharp fielding ended Pringle’s stay, leaving England teetering at 123 for 5. Paul Downton’s brief appearance ended in a run-out, and Emburey’s arrival brought a flicker of hope. Emburey’s quickfire 22, including a four and a six, injected momentum before Patterson’s searing yorker sent his stumps cartwheeling. At 162 for 7, England needed 82 runs from 54 balls, with their chances hanging by a thread.

Enter DeFreitas, whose fearless approach turned the tide. Lamb and DeFreitas stitched together a vital 47-run partnership, taking the attack to the West Indies. DeFreitas’s brisk 23 off 21 balls ended with another Patterson special, but his contribution had kept England in the hunt. Foster joined Lamb with 35 runs required from the final three overs.

The tension peaked as Walsh’s penultimate over leaked 16 runs, 15 of them from Lamb’s blade. Patterson’s final over tightened the screws, conceding just six runs and leaving England needing 13 from the last six balls. Walsh, under immense pressure, faltered. Four leg-side wides, a no-ball, and a boundary from a full-toss gifted England the edge. Foster’s composed strike to the fence sealed a famous victory, with Lamb unbeaten on a masterful 67 off 68 deliveries, featuring five boundaries and a six.

This dramatic encounter was a testament to the unpredictability of cricket, where grit and determination can triumph over adversity. England’s calculated gamble on Lamb’s brilliance and DeFreitas’s audacity turned a seemingly lost cause into a moment of World Cup glory, etching this game into the annals of cricketing history.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

 

A Clash for the Ages: India vs. Australia, 1987 World Cup Thriller

 

The 1987 World Cup delivered countless moments of cricketing brilliance, but few matches stand out as vividly as the Chennai encounter between defending champions India and eventual winners Australia. The clash on that sultry October day remains etched in memory as one of the greatest contests in the tournament's storied history, a testament to the unpredictability and drama of cricket.

The Prelude: A Battle of Strategies

India, led by the charismatic Kapil Dev, won the toss and elected to field. The decision, perhaps influenced by the humid conditions, proved to be a double-edged sword. Australia, guided by their shrewd skipper Allan Border, came prepared with a meticulous game plan. Openers Geoff Marsh and David Boon executed it to near perfection, crafting an opening partnership of 110 runs that laid the foundation for a daunting total.

Marsh, the architect of Australia’s innings, compiled a masterful 110, blending patient accumulation with precise stroke play. Boon’s 49 complemented Marsh’s knock, as the pair nullified the Indian bowlers on a pitch offering little assistance. As Marsh later reflected, "It was important to bat first and create pressure. For that, one of us had to stay there, which I did."

Dean Jones, an integral part of the Australian middle order, highlighted the meticulousness of their approach: "One of the rules inscribed on our kitbags was: 'To lose patience is to lose the battle.' We focused on rotating strike and taking singles, making the opposition’s fielding look ragged."

The Six That Wasn’t—Or Was It?

A moment of controversy arose during the innings when Jones lofted Maninder Singh towards long-on. Ravi Shastri leapt at the boundary but signalled the ball had landed inside the rope. Umpire Dickie Bird took Shastri’s word, awarding four runs. However, Australian coach Bobby Simpson, observing from close quarters, insisted it was a six. Post-innings discussions ensued, and Kapil Dev, embodying the spirit of the game, agreed to adjust the score. The Australian total was revised to 270—a decision that would later prove pivotal.

India’s Fiery Response: A Tale of Momentum

India’s chase began with a flurry of aggression. Sunil Gavaskar, often criticized for his conservative approach in ODIs, unleashed an uncharacteristic onslaught, smashing 37 off 32 balls. His partner, Krishnamachari Srikkanth, dazzled with a 70-run blitz, leaving the Australians scrambling. Debutant Navjot Singh Sidhu, shedding his "strokeless wonder" tag, showcased audacious hitting, racing to 73 off 79 deliveries. By the time India reached 207 for 2, victory seemed a foregone conclusion.

Dean Jones aptly summarized the shift in Indian mindset: "It was surprising to see Sunny take the lead. He set the tempo and lifted the entire team’s confidence."

The Turning Tide: McDermott’s Spell of Magic

Just as India appeared poised for a comfortable win, Allan Border turned to Craig McDermott. The pacer’s second spell proved transformative. Mixing pace with cunning off-cutters, McDermott dismantled India’s middle order, sending Sidhu, Mohammad Azharuddin, and Dilip Vengsarkar back to the pavilion in quick succession. Ravi Shastri fell to a deceptive slower ball, leaving India’s lower order to navigate a mounting crisis.

"McDermott was like a racehorse," Jones remarked. "Once he got his confidence, he grew stronger and better. His 'gorilla teeth' were out, and the bite was real."

The Final Act: Drama at the Death

The match was a microcosm of cricket’s unpredictable nature, where every moment was fraught with tension and the outcome hung by the thinnest of threads. India, chasing a target set by Australia, needed just 16 runs from the final 24 balls, with 4 wickets still intact. The equation seemed favourable, yet the ghosts of earlier moments in the game, particularly the havoc wreaked by Craig McDermott, lingered. McDermott had put India on the back foot with his incisive spell, but with Kapil Dev and K. Srikkanth at the crease, there was still hope.

Kapil Dev, a man synonymous with Indian cricketing glory, had been the architect of many memorable victories. But in this instance, the pressure of the chase seemed to have gotten to him. He holed out to Simon O'Donnell, and suddenly, the equation became much more precarious. The score remained at 265, but now only 3 wickets stood between India and the elusive victory. At the same score, Roger Binny, who had been one of India’s unsung heroes in the 1983 World Cup, attempted to pressurize the Australian fielders with a quick single off Geoff Lawson. However, in a moment of brilliance, David Jones, positioned at mid-on, unleashed a direct hit that left Binny stranded, and India’s hopes were further dimmed. With Binny’s departure, India was now 265 for 7, and the chase seemed to be slipping away.

Yet, cricket is a game of ebb and flow, and Srikkanth, a batsman known for his fearless stroke play, was not about to give up. He struck Steve Waugh for two brilliant fours, both to the leg side, momentarily reigniting India’s chances. But as the score stood at 265, Manoj Prabhakar, who had been a key figure in India’s bowling attack, was next to face. He pushed a ball to cover and began to sprint down the wicket for a quick single. The tension was palpable as Allan Border, one of Australia’s most reliable fielders, swiftly picked up the ball and threw down the stumps with unerring accuracy. Prabhakar was run out, leaving India with just two wickets to go and the target still looming large.

As the final over began, Maninder Singh, the number eleven batsman, stood at the crease, facing Steve Waugh. India needed 6 runs to win, and the atmosphere was charged with an almost surreal sense of déjà vu. Maninder had been at the centre of a similarly tense finish in the 1986 tied match between India and Australia, and the memories of that encounter must have weighed heavily on his mind. But the man known for his calm demeanour in pressure situations was not easily rattled.

Maninder, with remarkable composure, played two intelligent shots. The first, a well-timed stroke past point for two runs, and the second, a neatly turned ball to backward square for another two. The equation had now narrowed down to 2 runs from 2 balls, and the tension was almost unbearable. The crowd, the players, and even the commentators could feel the weight of the moment. Jones, positioned at mid-on, later admitted that a sense of eerie déjà vu washed over him as he silently willed the ball into the air, hoping for a catch that would seal the match.

Steve Waugh, one of the most reliable bowlers in Australian cricket, ran in with the ball, his eyes fixed on the target. The ball, delivered with precision, was dead straight, and Maninder, in a moment of misfortune, missed it entirely. The sound of the ball clattering into the stumps echoed around the stadium, signalling the end of India’s valiant chase. The death rattle was unmistakable, and with it, India’s hopes of victory were dashed.

The final score of 269—one run more than the target set by Australia—was a cruel irony. India had fallen short by a mere 1 run, but the result was far more than just a statistic. It was a loss that cut deep, a loss that was defined not just by the runs on the scoreboard but by the moments that led to it. Kapil Dev’s decision to declare the innings had been a magnanimous gesture, aimed at giving his bowlers enough time to dismiss Australia. But in hindsight, it proved to be a double-edged sword. The two runs added during the break had, in the end, proven decisive.

The loss was one of the closest margins in World Cup history, and it underscored the razor-thin margin between success and failure in cricket. India had fought valiantly, and yet, the cruel reality of sport was that the smallest of mistakes, the slightest of miscalculations, could tip the scales in favour of the opposition. It was a defeat that would haunt the Indian team for years to come, a defeat that lingered not just in the numbers but in the hearts of those who had watched, lived, and breathed every moment of that unforgettable match.

The Aftermath: A Match for the Ages

The six—or four—that sparked controversy ultimately decided the outcome. Bob Simpson reflected, "It may have seemed like good fortune for us, but it was right."

The loss was a bitter pill for India, yet it underscored cricket’s inherent unpredictability. For Australia, it was a stepping stone towards their maiden World Cup triumph, solidifying their status as a cricketing powerhouse.

This match remains a symbol of cricket’s glorious uncertainty, where every run, decision, and moment can alter the course of history.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar