Sunday, December 17, 2017

What a jaffa from Mitchell Starc, but delivery of the century? Delivery of the Ashes?


Mitchell Starc's delivery to James Vince was an absolute Jaffa, but to term it as the ball of the Ashes or ball of the century is a pretty overrated statement. Especially, 'Ball of the century'.

If a delivery is rated as the 'Ball of the century' on the basis of #Ashes then it's quite funny. In the history of Test cricket there are many deliveries better than this or Shane Warne's delivery to Gatting.
Neither do we have idea about deliveries before the television era nor idea about those deliveries since matches started to get telecast on TV. The amount of live telecast of matches were lesser in amount before cable television burst into the scene in 90s.

It's tough to rate any deliveries as so highly or any deliveries as 'Ball of the century' or 'Ball of the Ashes'.


If I need to term any delivery as the best of all times since 90s on Australian soil, it would be Wasim Akram's mesmerising stuff to Allan Lamb in the World Cup final at MCG. Wasim bowled from round the wicket, got the ball to move the other way from an acute angle - far, far better than Starc and should be the all-time best delivery ever bowled on Australian soil since the 90s.

Thank You
Faisal Caesar 

Steve Smith: The captain, the batsman


Steve Smith can bat. Yes, he can not only bat but score runs in plenty and he doesn’t get satisfied with a hundred only – a daddy hundred is needed to satisfy his appetite. But the picture was different eight years ago. On December 2009, Steve was called into the Australian squad as a cover of injured Nathan Haruitz before a Test against West Indies at Perth. Smith had to wait 18 more months to wear the Baggy Green Cap.

A dissatisfied Terry Jenner said, “In my view he’s not just ready for this level of cricket”. Terry was someone who predicted, Smith would be one of the best wrist spinners for Australia if given enough time and space, but he was not in favour of Smith’s early entry to Test squad. Neither Terry nor the Australian selectors could deny how desperate they all were during to that period to discover another Shane Warne despite knowing the fact, such legends are born once in a generation.

Smith made his debut at Lord’s in 2010 against Pakistan and showed glimpses of his talent as an all-rounder, but since then, his expertise remained a mystery to all – all kept guessing about whether Smith is a legspinner or a bowling allrounder.

***
After watching that daring 77 at Leeds against Pakistan in 2010, I came to the conclusion, he was going to be another limited-overs sensation and obviously a poster boy of franchise-based league cricket. His technique was no way near Test standard and he was more of a slam-bang sort of batter. My interest waned about him.

But in cricket, you don’t always need the ideal technique to flourish. There are so many examples and the biggest of them all is Sir Don Bradman, whose greatness developed on his own technique. Javed Miandad was another batsman who became the backbone of Pakistan batting relying on his self-made technique. Gradually, Smith would register his name in the school of self-made technique since 2014 and would continue to plunder the bowlers around the park by scoring daddy hundreds.

Not only that, he would also be given the captaincy of Australian team – a matter which was never thought when he made his debut and when Ponting was angry with him during World Cup 2011 about a catch. He lacked temperamental refinement. But he learned fast to adjust with everything and the result is, he is captain of Australia at present.     

***

Smith lacks the aggression of Ian Chappell or technical brain of Mark Taylor as a captain, but still, he is someone who has the ability to lead from the front. In this years’s Ashes, he was found wanting as a captain on the field at Brisbane, but he made that irrelevant with a gutsy hundred and at Perth, he responded to England’s glory in first innings with a double ton – a ton which battered his counterpart Joet Root and his men psychologically. As the day progressed, it proved more to be Smith v England.


How good was the hundred at Perth? In my opinion, it was just better as I have seen his best in India on testing tracks and all those hundreds were scored on the basis of self-made technique. You cannot say, he struggles on turning tracks as he learned fast after that debacle in Sri Lanka. He can play pace and spin very well or may be there is still another exam left where he needs to pass – swing bowling. But the way he is learning fast, in a matter of time, he might overcome that with flying colours as well.   

Thank You
Faisal Caesar 

Friday, December 15, 2017

Son, you made me proud


Jonny Bairstow was stuck on 99 at Cape Town in the second Test on 2016. He needed just one more run and plenty of thoughts cropped up in his mind, especially the thoughts of his father late David Bairstow whose death anniversary was tow days later. Mr. David was suffering from a depression and on one black day, the eight-year old Jonny and his family experienced his father’s suicide in a very uncomfortable manner. It was tough times for the Bairstow family. His mother was suffering from a cancer while his sister was too young to feel the horrendous impact of the tragedy.

Mr. David was a renowned cricketer himself and had a lot of influence on the blue-eyed young Jonny to take cricket seriously. Bairstow’s mother struggled to the limits to make her children able enough. At Cape Town, perhaps, she was nervous when his son needed one run to break the hoodoo of nervous nineties – he failed to overcome a red hot Morkel at Lord’s in 2012 and ended up the ghost on 95.

Morkel was still giving him troubles but Bairstow sustained the pressure despite the memories of his father trying to overcast his concentration. One more run, yes one more run was needed to make Mr. Bairstow happy. One more run was needed to say “YES”.

South Africa brought on Van Zyl and Jonny middled one to backward pont for four. We all heard “Yesssss”. The heavens heard it as well as Jonny went on to notch up 150 runs.

“My mum is sometimes unable to look when I bat; she might hide in a corridor when I get near a landmark score. I know she’ll braved this one out, but everyone is standing and applauding so I can’t hear her first. I point my bat towards where I know for certain she and Becky are sitting, gesture for them alone.

Eventually the noise of the crowd dies away. And I think of starting my innings again. But first, I take one last look at the sky. If heaven has a pub, I hope my dad is in it now. I hope he’s ordering a pint to celebrate.

Then I hope he orders another one”.

***
Dawid Malan and Jonny have already scripted an influential partnership to boost England’s confidence. Malan reached his hundred to earn all the accolades, but at the other end, Jonny was calm and quiet and thinking of reaching another milestone to stabilise England’s position and make his father happy on the eve of Christmas. Just like Cape Town, he needed one more run. One more run to answer the critics of head-butt and make his father say “YES” in the heaven.

Mitchell Marsh delivered one short and Jonny swung it towards leg to reach his fourth Test hundred. His celebration was a bit of a nuzzle for his helmet and then look towards the sky in search of his father.

“What a brilliant knock! Son, you made me proud. More strength to you. This is my Christmas gift.”

Perhaps, David said such. May be yes, may be no. Only Bairstow can say as all son and daughter have a special telepathic connection with their parents.    

David is a proud father today. Surely an Ashes ton in the home of enemy means a lot! 


Thank You
Faisal Caesar 

Thursday, December 14, 2017

Courage wrapped in the box of composure


William Harvey, the physician who discovered the principals of blood circulation, hails from Roehampton, a suburban district in southwest of London. Dr. Harvey was a genius and tough character and Roehmapton has the tradition of producing tough characters – Earl of Derby, William Pitt the younger, Peter Westbury, Earl of Garnard etc. were also from Roehmapton and in that sense, it’s not a surprise that Dawid Malan would exhibit such a tough temperament at WACA Ground against the barrage of short pitch bowling on first day.

Starc tested him with his cannon balls and so did Cummins. While Josh Hazlewood was nippy as always. Still, Malan progressed safely through some of the tricky passages of play by investing faith in his will power and technique. It was more about courage wrapped in a box of composure. Just like Harvey used to exhibit his guts in a calm and composed manner towards those women who were accused of witchcraft in 1634 and the king sent Harvey to examine those women and give his final reports.    


It was a great knock. A much needed one from a figure who was not expected to do such. A figure who’s Test future is always hanging on a thin rope. Cook’s defensive strokeplay doesn’t fetch him results these days and succumbed to a straighter one too early while Root failed to lead from the front and it was all left to England’s new faces to show the way. Malan marshalled the innings in a mature way and of course, I need to praise Jonny Bairstow’s support at the other end.  

Thank You
Faisal Caesar 

Sunday, December 10, 2017

Shakib Al Hasan as the Test captain - Smart decision but not without a risk


Nazmul Hassan is a smart guy. He knows how to play chess and so far, his chess playing abilities have struck gold, despite the criticisms of local press and ex-cricketers. But such criticism hardly mattered to him as barking dogs seldom bites.
Whatever Nazmul Hassan has done so far, he did it with utter confidence and with maximum risks.  

There always remained a but in his decisions and today’s “Breaking News” would also not be without a but....

Yes, there will always be a ‘but’ in case of Shakib Al Hasan’s ascendancy to Test captain of Bangladesh. The ‘but’ is whether Shakib is interested to lead or not. If he is given the captaincy with the thinking of keeping the superstar busy with Test cricket and shift his interest from playing foreign leagues, then it might prove handy for Bangladesh.

Shakib is more of a whimsical character who relies more on his instincts while fulfilling the responsibilities – if the great man is not enjoying anything, you cannot force him to fetch results. It is very important, he is given the space to to think his own way and sort out matters on his own. But it is also important to notice, such characters don’t cross the limits.

Shakib ‘crossed the limits’ by seeking for a break for five-day formats before a major series against South Africa and, perhaps, to teach him a lesson, BCB shouldered him a big responsibility. But, I repeat, but, they also need to keep in mind whether Shakib is ready for it or not.

Without a doubt, Shakib is a far better captain than others, but he needs to enjoy it at first because he is a mixed big like Romario and Kevin Pietersen. You never know what he can come up with. Either it might be absolutely silly or ridiculous or it might be something eye-popping and jaw-dropping stuff.


But also, I must say, with time, a professional sports person earns maturity and professionalism. In that sense, Shakib should take Test captaincy as a motivating factor. Moreover, he, along with Mashrafe Mortaza and Mushfiqur Rahim expressed their confidence of leading the side against Sri Lanka even without a head-coach. So, I don’t think he should be taken aback by Test captaincy but give his absolute best to prove his worth as the captain in white clothes.  

Thank You
Faisal Caesar      

Tuesday, December 5, 2017

Richard Pybus should not be the ideal choice as head coach


Let me be loud and clear about Richard Pybus: He is not the ideal choice as the head coach of Tigers. While he was involved with Pakistan and West Indies, he could only earn plenty of negatives rather than positives. I have been following Pybus’ coaching since he was involved with Pakistan cricket in 1999. Whenever Pybus was around, Pakistan’s results were nothing but shambolic.

As soon as he was removed as coach after the Australian tour, Pakistan picked themselves up tremendously under Javed Miandad in 2000 until that defeat in the dark at Karachi. In 2001, General Tauqir Zia, whom I always rated as someone who knew nothing about the game, re-appointed Pybus again to coach the Pakistan team in England. Pakistan’s performance was good but showed his disinterest to coach Pakistan in 2001 and left after 9/11 terrorist attack.

Pakistan roped in Mudassar Nazar and until Australia dashed them at Colombo and Middle East, Mudassar was doing a fantastic job. Pybus was reappointed for the fouth time in 2002, September and one thing I could realise, Pakistan’s future would be dark under this man, who might have been a very competent customer as domestic level but at international level, he lacks the ability to manage the men, plan accordingly, bring the best out of the talents available and heavily lacks the ability to accept cultural differences. Pakistan continued to take the downward spirals and at the end of World Cup 2003, Pakistan cricket hit the rock bottom and Pybus had to leave forever. It took Pakistan and Mr. Tauqir Zia so long to realise how poor Pybus was as an international coach.

***

Pybus went to West Indies and I would only sahre the quotes of Andre E Baptiste, “his is not the first time that Pybus has been negatively associated with West Indies cricket, as we have all heard of his many battles with leading players.
If one did not know better,  it would be easy to surmise that Pybus was actually jealous of some West Indian players. Some suggest it could be the style, the dress, the wealth of the players or something as basic as their good looks, which is probably a more important criteria than most believe in light of how easy foreigners seem to be attracted to our West Indian stars.

So who is Richard Pybus?  And why did the WICB hire him? And what of the fact that coaches in the Caribbean squirm, when they hear his name? Pybus was employed with both Pakistan and Bangladesh cricket associations, with little noticeable success during either term”.        

Andre also added, “As we are now in May 2016 (31 months into a 36 month contract), we can honestly look at the Professional Cricket League pioneered by Pybus and state it has failed. He did not understand and respect the cultural differences from Guyana to St Kitts to Jamaica to Antigua to Barbados to St Vincent to T&T to Grenada to Dominica to St Lucia. But this is not his fault. He is a stranger in a land, where there is a rich history of pride, reputation, style and not one of dogma and contempt. It has been difficult to make the necessary adjustment”.

Even there was a school of thought, Pybus interfered with each and everything in West Indies.

Thankfully, that guy left West Indies.

Good for Pakistan, they did not decide to stick to him further. 

***

Pybus’ association with Pakistan and West Indies were not chummy. Even when he came to Bangladesh five years ago,the experience was not good. He left in the twinkle of an eye. If I had to praise the previous BCB boss for one reason, Mustafa Kamal, then it would be his decision to let Pybus go without even caring his proposals. 

Whether Pybus would be the head coach of Bangladesh or not, still not yet decided, but for the sake of engaging a foreign coach, it would not be smart enough to rope in someone like Pybus, who, as a person is very critical and lacks the personality to control the team.

I expect the Bangladesh media and celebrated critics to act sensibly in this case.


Bangladesh matter more than settling personal scores.  

Thank You
Faisal Caesar

Sunday, November 26, 2017

Hazlewood dazzles


Line, length and Josh Hazlewood

Be it in Test cricket or 50-over format, Josh Hazlewood is the bowler on whom you would love to invest faith.  He is a damn good bowler. He created an immediate impact on his debut at Brisbane against the touring Indian team. India lost six wickets for 87 runs at the hands of Hazlewood. On the second day, Hazlewood found nifty movement and steep trajectory against which the visitors had no clue. Hazlewood announced his arrival with a five-wicket haul and since then, world cricket only witnessed the rise and rise of Hazlewood as a competent bowler.

He doesn’t care about media attention. He doesn’t bother about spending time on social media. In fact, he doesn’t have any accounts on Twitter. He doesn’t talk much and focuses only on making the ball to do all the talking. Moreover, he doesn’t bang the ball short to target the rib cage. Nor does he have the lethal expresse yorkers and make our jaw drop. He comes from the school of Fazal Mahmood, Sir Richard Hadlee and Glenn McGrath, where pitching the ball on the right line and length, is given the topmost priority – target the top of off and you reap a rich harvest.

And, since his debut, his McGrath-like-ploy paid rich dividends. He has proved himself as one of the saints in the pace-bowling fraternity who can pitch the ball in that good length spot and attacking line over after over and Test matches after Test matches. Neither does he get bored nor does he get tired of doing the same thing. Hashim Amla and Murali Vijay can tell you better about Hazlewood’s mind-blowing consistency.

Especially Amla who was outclassed by him last year. Hazlewood tested him with his expertise and so far, Amla has been dismissed five times by Hazlewood.

“I had a little chat with him after the series was finished as well, just about different things he'd worked on to try and counteract, but obviously didn't work”, Hazlewood said. “He's one person who does watch a lot of footage and you could see the changes there in that last Test that he made, just dragged a bit wider and same result”.

“I could just see that he changed, he set up a little bit differently. He was getting further across outside off, wanting me to follow him and target the stumps a bit more and then he's a class player off his pads. I just took it a little bit wider and took the stumps out of the equation. He probably could have left a lot more, which he did do early on, but then he started playing a couple through impatience, I guess, and I got the result."

Australia lost the series against South Africa, but Hazlewood’s bowling did not lose its shine but continue to dazzle against Pakistan as well. The Pakistani top order found how tough was it to counter Hazlewood’s nagging and incisive line and length.

Length too full, struggle on Day 1

26% of his dismissals are caught while 39.7% are caught behind, an indication of how much he targets the edge like McGrath and Sir Richard Hadlee. In the ongoing Ashes series, Hazlewood’s such line-and-length bowling were much needed, but in the first innings he frustrated his team and fans as he struggled to pitch the ball on the right length:  Of the 72 balls Josh Hazlewood bowled, 24 were full deliveries and yielded 28 runs. Nine of the 13 boundaries scored until tea came off full-length deliveries on the first day. England capitalised on it big time. The Australian shoulders dropped as their pacers failed to deliver on Day 1. Especially, Hazlewood’s struggle with the length became a huge concern as he is an expert in utilising the length in any conditions.

The roar of the New South Wales man on Day 3 and 4   

Steve Smith’s brilliant hundred gave Australia a lead in first innings and at the fag end of Day 3, Smith needed his battery of pace bowlers to fire all cylinders and they did not let him down.

Hazlewood drew first flood by dismissing the backbone of English batting line-up Alastair Cook. This time he set Cook up by pitching it short in and around middle and leg and attempted Cook to go for the hook shot as a man was standing at long leg. The ploy worked as Cook forgot his abilities to resist and holed out to long leg.

This wicket changed the complexion of the Australian pacers. Pat Cummins kept on bowling with a lot of hostility whereas, Hazlewood rediscovered his bowling mojo: He pulled his length back and pitched 43% of his deliveries on the good line and length. And from a good length, he made the ball to swing and seam to create doubts in the minds of English batters.

On Day 4, he carried on his bowling rhythm and the way he set up Joe Root in the afternoon session, allowed Australia to strengthen their position on this Test more.

In a tricky passage of play in afternoon session, Steve Smith engaged Hazlewood and Lyon against Root and Moeen Ali. Root was well set to stitch a very important partnership for the fifth wicket. Smith needed to break this partnership and with few overs left for tea, a wicket might provide a huge psychological boost.

In the 39th over of England’s second innings, Hazlewood bowled with a short-length and tad fuller. Such deliveries were a cakewalk for a batsman like Root who fetched two boundaries in one over – the second one was a straight drive back past the bowler to please the purists of the game. But very few could realize, Root was allowed to relax a bit so that he fell into the trap.

In the 40th over, Hazlewood pitched one on the pads of Root who flicked it for two runs to bring up his half-century. Root was already in the comfort zone and was made to expect more mediocre stuff from Hazlewood. With ten minutes left for tea, Josh nipped one back into Root along the middle and leg which seamed a bit and trapped Root lbw. Root, the best batsman in the world, failed to use his feet and could not even get enough time to get back and behind the line of the ball.

A couple of hit-me deliveries followed by a peach – a perfect way to trap the best batsman in modern cricket. Hazlewood delivered his team the breakthrough which ensured Australia’s command.


And after tea when Ali was dismissed by creating a lot of buzz in social media, England’s confidence was buried. Mitchell Starc’s hostility and Nathan Lyon’s expertise ended England’s innings. Australia are few runs away from taking the lead and the credit must be given to Hazlewood to instill the intent which was lacking among Australian pacers in first innings.

Note: This article is published at Cricketsoccer on 26/11/2017 Hazlewood dazzles

Thank You
Faisal Caesar 

Saturday, November 25, 2017

When the going gets tough, Smith gets going



A leader is one who knows the way, goes the way, and shows the way.

John C. Maxwell

When the going gets tough, Australian skipper gets going

Three and a half years ago, at Cape Town, in the third Test against South Africa, Australian captain Michael Clarke responded the queries about his form in the most emphatic fashion with a magnificent 161 against a fast and furious Proteas attack. The series was locked 1-1 and when Clarke came out to bat, Australia desperately needed their captain to shine and erase the memories of Steyn’s fiery spell in the second Test. Clarke did what the doctors ordered.

Then in 2005, at Manchester, Ricky Ponting was fighting it out against a rejuvenated English unit who threatened the number one side in the world at that time. The series was hanging in the balance and England were all set to take a lead in the third. But Ponting played one of the best captain’s knocks in the history of Ashes and denied England of a victory. Of course, the gallant resistance of Brett Lee and Glenn McGrath in the final overs could not be undermined.

Rewind to 1975 and Clive Lloyd’s fast men was in no mood to show any sympathy towards Greg Chappell who inherited the captaincy from his brother Ian Chappell. It was his first series as captain and in the first Test at Brisbane, Greg unleashed his true self by smashing hundreds in both innings against Andy Roberts, Michael Holding and Lance Gibbs. Australia drew first blood against Lloyd’s men and that hundred set the tone for rest of the series. West Indies left Australian shore bruised and battered.

Allan Border, Mark Taylor, Steve Waugh and even Adam Gilchrist responded in tough circumstances while leading the team. It has always been the nature of Australian captains to deliver the best when the going gets tough and certainly, Steve Smith, the present captain of Australia, would respond towards adversity like his past masters. On the third day of first Test at Brisbane, when the going got tough, Smith got going.

Captaincy, the Australian way  

The Australian way of captaincy is unique. An Australian captain must be a lateral thinker and must have the stomach to walk on water and make his men do the same. He must be adventurous and of course, he must not think about losing but think of how to win from any situation.

According to Ian Chappell a captain, “must earn it in three categories: as a player, as a human being and finally as a leader. If a captain achieves those aims and complements them with a good knowledge of the game which he applies with common sense and a dash of daring, and he's endowed with a reasonable share of luck, he's on the way to a rating of excellent. If he also has very good players around him, then there's no stopping the guy”.

He also said, “Having agreed there are a variety of ways for a skipper to get the best out of a team, there is one sure way: make the cricket interesting. A captain shouldn't fear losing, but he should hate losing. There's a big difference. The former will be a defensive captain, the latter aggressive. Why? Because in the first case the captain will do everything in his power to avoid defeat, including manoeuvring into a position from which he can't lose before he goes for the win. The second type will go flat out for victory from ball one and only opt for the draw when all hope of winning is lost”.

Character is very important to become a leader and his ability to lead by an example must play a vital role in lifting the confidence of the team. If you are not leading by an example, then you cannot be called an Australian skipper in the true sense of term.

Leading from the front at The Gabba

Steve Smith’s captaincy is not as proactive as Michael Clarke, Allan Border or Chappell brothers. At times I tend to get annoyed with him when he starts to think like an orthodox skipper and waits for the things to happen which is quite un-Australian. Then last year, when he failed to respond boldly at Sri Lanka and got dismissed in an amateurish way, I wondered, is Smith tough enough to conquer adverse circumstances? After the defeat against South Africa, my thinking about Smith, the captain, started to become permanent. He is not a typical Australian captain.

Steve Smith responded well against Pakistan, but it was a gift from Misbah-ul-Haq’s pragmatic approach rather than Smith’s impact as the captain and at the start of 2017, in India, Smith did give us the impression, he is changing as a captain and under tough circumstances, he has learned to manage his innings.

In the first session of third day, Australia lost three wickets in a quick succession. Shaun Marsh, Tim Paine and Mitchell Starc walked for the pavilion leaving the hosts tottering at 209 for 7. They were still trailing by 93 runs and the way James Anderson and Stuart Broad were bowling it seemed, England would start their second innings with a healthy lead.

But one man denied to give up easily and it was the captain of Australia Steve Smith. Having learned from the past mistakes and having acquired the ability to read the situation of a Test match over the years, Smith believed, if he could occupy the crease more and exhibit composure, there would be a possibility of taking upper hand against the visitors.

Joe Root tried to attack Smith but he curbed his urge to counterattack and continued to leave the balls outside off which posed a threat from the back of a length. He invested his scoring chances more on loose deliveries and frustrated the captain, fielders and bowlers who were forced to run out of ideas as the time progressed. In modern day cricket, the critics highlight the importance of scoring quickly even in test matches only to glorify Twenty20 format, but Smith made them realise, scoring at a slow rate in Test cricket is as valuable as gold no matter in which era you play.

Had Smith counterattacked, the situation would have been worse and the kind of field Root set, it required the assistance of a smart thinker who would only occupy the crease and win each moment with sheer grit. At the end of the day, it was Smith’s patience which won the day for Australia. It was an absolute masterclass from Smith, similar to the one which he palyed against India on a testing Ranchi track a couple months back.

Captaincy has brought the best out Smith’s batting as ESPNcricinfo suggest, “Since he took over the leadership in December 2014, Smith has the most centuries among all captains in Tests. Virat Kohli is second with 11; no other captain has more than five. Smith's average of 61.23 is also the second highest for any captain to have led in a minimum of 10 matches. Only Bradman has a higher average with 101.51”.

He faced 261 balls to reach his 21st Test ton, the slowest Ashes century for Australia since 1993 when David Boon took 284 balls to score a hundred at Lord’s. A slow knock, but when you think about the impact of such knocks, you are forced to think how tough Test cricket is and how tough scoring runs are in a five-day match.

Smith led from the front. His presence at the crease made all of us think, when the going gets tough, an Australian captain does get going. Today Smith got going and whenever an Australian captain scored a hundred at The Gabba, Australia hardly lost a Test. Only time will tell how impactful Smith’s knock would be in the remaining two days.  

Note: This article is published at Cricketsoccer on 25/11/2017 When the going gets tough, Smith gets going

Thank You 
Faisal Caesar 

  

Friday, November 24, 2017

Joe Root's attacking and innovative captaincy on Day 2


Joe Root, at the age of seven, attracted his schoolmates when a giant butterfly landed on his shoulders. The boy from Yorkshire was surrounded by enthusiastic kids at the Tropical Butterfly House. Then, he was found holding a cricket bat at the age of two days! As a cricketer at the school level, he would attract everyone with his power of resistance. At home, he would be practicing shadow shots by holding a bat in front of the mirror and in those days, his routine was limited to eating and practicing in the nets. His activities attracted the people surrounding him, he had always been the centre of attraction and if I am not wrong, a born leader is more often the centre of attraction and hints such at a very early age.

Blue eyes, silky hair, polite nature and the boyish smile on a baby face have always hide the tough thinking cricketer within him. But his qualities as a cricketer never remained hidden for long, but it was discovered at an early age. Root was awarded a scholarship at the age of 13. Kevin Sharp, the former County coach said, “There was something special about him: he listened and asked the right questions. He already thought like an adult”.

Root led the Youth team at Collegiate. He was leading the side because he was already a very thinking and innovative captain apart from the best batsman of the team.

Daniel Bringham wrote at Cricket Monthly, “While playing for adult teams he would advise the skipper and, unusually for one so young, set his own fields when bowling - first medium pace, then offspin. When batting with senior players, many three times his age, he would always be talking between overs, saying to them, "Right, this is what we have to do”.

These are unique qualities and are much-needed to evolve as a great cricketer. Root certainly has evolved as one of the best cricketers of modern times alongside Virat Kohli, Steve Smith, Kane Williamson and AB de Villiers.

The first time I witnessed him five years ago in India, his technique and assured-presence at the crease, gave me the impression, he would went on to improve, improve and improve for England in the upcoming days. And certainly, I was not wrong, but I was not sure whether he would be the ideal person to replace Alastair Cook – who had to step down after failing to overcome his defensive mindset and a frustrating lean-patch during the tour in subcontinent last year.

May be I was not well aware of his abilities which he showed at a very young age. The cricketing fraternity in England knew how good captain Root could be and so far, Root has only impressed everyone not only with his man-management and pressure-handling capabilit s, but the ability to innovate when nothing is happening and read the situation deeply and go for the right moves.

Root is an attackingly innovative captain.

We could see his attacking captaincy in England and he brought the same attacking flair in Australia as well.

Brilliant captaincy at The Gabba on Day 2

On Day 2, Australia halted England’s further progress. Mitchell Starc and co found their mojo – hit the right length at last and triggered a collapse. England were all out for 302, but when Australia came out to bat, they found the going tough. The English pacers were right on the money from word go and wickets kept on tumbling at a regular interval – extra lift from back of  a length outside off posed a huge threat.

While Australia were reeling against the English bowlers, Root was making things tough for the hosts with his captaincy.   

Firstly, Root’s decision to engage Moeen Ali in the ninth over when the ball was still hard and new for James Anderson and Stuart Broad to utilise. But what made Root to go for Moeen was the presence of two left-handers at the crease. An Offspinner always poses a threat to the southpaws and Usman Khawaja has always been a soft target against right-arm orthodox. In the third ball of eleventh over, Ali trapped Khawaja lbw and Root’s innovative move to engage Ali paid off.

Secondly, he smartly used Chris Woakes as the stock bowler and replacement of Ben Stokes. While bowling, Stokes brings on a lot of raw energy with his aggression and deceptive pace. He doesn’t fetch a lot of wickets but always helps to maintain the pressure at one end. Root used Whoakes in a similar fashion. Woakes clocked around 87-90 mph and his deliveries were mostly around the ribcage area like Neil Wagner – highly effective kinds of stuff to put chills in the spine and create the platform for taking wickets.

Thirdly, keeping a short midwicket against David Warner, despite knowing the fact, he is a very good player on the onside and on the backfoot. Dawid Malan was kept in that position only to stare at Warner and his bat. Root noticed how Warner was gaining his momentum by smothering boundaries and thus thought, he might get carried away if the length drops short. Jake Ball dragged his length to a shorter one in the fourth ball of 20th over and Warner played it neither on the back nor on the front, failed to keep it down and holed out to short midwicket.

Finally, Root’s field setting was absolutely up to the mark throughout the day. For Steve Smith, he kept a leg slip to pressurize him more. It reminded me of Douglas Jardine. The English pacers understood what his captain wanted from them and thus, banged in short and extracted bounce from a good length in and around middle and off so that Smith falls while attempting to duck, pull or hook.


Then, Jimmy went round the wicket with a leg slip in place and two slips and a gully against Shaun Marsh. The leg slip was kept to fool the batsmen as the plan was to move the cherry away from the batsman and kiss the edge.

With Marsh and Smith exhibiting resolve and stitching a partnership to drag Australia out of the fire, Root decided to make things happen. He kept three fielders on the offside facing towards Marsh from short mid-off and mid-off. The plan was to instill a mental intimidation and attempt Marsh to play a false stroke and script his end.

Certainly, Root’s captaincy had been praiseworthy.

At the end of the day, Australia ended with without any further trouble but their going won’t be easier on Day 3.       

 Note: This article is published at Cricketsoccer on 24/11/2017 Joe Root’s attacking and innovative captaincy on Day 2

Thank You
Faisal Caesar 

Thursday, November 23, 2017

Australian pacers were too easy to handle


Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins

After reading such names, any batting lineup would be tensed and feel the heat even before facing them. Starc’s aggression, Hazlewood’s nagging and incisive line-and-length and Cummins’ raw pace generated a lot of hype among critics and fans all around the world.  Especially, the brilliant Ryan Harris rated the current Australian attack better than 2013-14. He said, "(Josh) Hazlewood's probably doing the job that I did, and he's quicker than me and gets more bounce”.

"You've got Starc, who can definitely do a Johnson role, and you've got (Pat) Cummins - so you've probably got an extra bit of pace."

But after first day of first Test at Brisbane; Starc, Hazlewood and Cummins failed to live up to the expectations. It was England who dominated the proceedings most of the times and ended the day with a lot of positives to count for.

Nature of Brisbane track  

Being a follower cricket since the late 80s, my experience of first day at Brisbane had been all about pace and bounce. During the overcast conditions, naturally it used to aid the swing bowlers but on rest of the time, even on a bright sunny day, the track provided enough assistance for the fast men.

Not only that, the bounce at The Gabba hardly diminished throughout the five days. In fact, Brisbane used to be one of those wickets which maintained the balance between bat and ball. If a batsman is good enough to play on the backfoot, he can score runs while if a bowler keeps line-and-length accurate in and around that middle and offstump line, wickets would come.

Moreover, historically, Brisbane has always supported teams batting first: The Gabba exhibits a small advantage to teams batting first. In 59 Tests 25 have been won by the team batting first and 20 have been won by the team batting second with four Tests drawn.

But since 2006, the nature of Brisbane wicket changed. According to CricViz, “Pace bowlers have found less seam (0.82°) and swing (0.60°) at The Gabba than at any other Australian ground while the spinners have found less spin (2.83°) than at any venue other than Hobart”. But still, the bounce at Brisbane remained good enough as CricViz said, “Since 2006 no ground has a higher average bounce height at the stumps than the Gabba’s 91cm for pace bowlers, while for spinners the 78cm stump bounce height is only one less than the 79cm at The WACA”.

The ideal length to bowl at Gabba

The best way to fetch wickets at the Gabba is by keeping the length correct. As CricViz states, “Typically the best length for pace bowlers in Test cricket is between six and eight meters from the batsman’s stumps, however, at The Gabba the optimal length is in fact fractionally shorter than that – around eight to nine meters from the batsman’s stumps. From this length pace bowlers average 23.83 compared to 30.73 from the traditional full-length. When playing on the front foot against pace at The Gabba batsmen average 41.64”.

You might extract enough lateral movement by bowling a full-length from rest of the world, but at The Gabba, by keeping the length full won’t be helpful enough. The best way is to bowl at the back of a length with an attacking line. Years after years, Glenn McGrath did such and even you can be extremely successful by bouncing the ball from a short of a length and good length at an express pace – Mitchell Johnson scripted terror four years ago by applying such a tactic.

Australian pacers erred in length, lacked the aggressive intent   

Even though, the track for the first Test was different from the previous ones, still, it had a stiff bounce for the bowlers to utilise. Gradually, the track started to aid the spinners, but the bounce was always there. Nathan Lyon bowled brilliantly after tea and used the bounce to his advantage. He kept the line and length right and gave English batters some nervous moments.

 Whereas, the Australian pacers too easy to handle.

Since Starc dismissed Alastair Cook with a beautiful delivery, his lively presence was missing rest of the day. At the other end, Hazlewood and Cummins lacked the cutting edge which was required to knock off a shaky Mark Stoneman and James Vince when they were not yet set at the crease.

The Australian pacers kept the length too full as ESPNcricinfo’s numbers suggest, “at tea, Australia had bowled 91 balls at a full length and conceded 65 runs at 4.28 runs per over. Of the 72 balls Josh Hazlewood bowled, 24 were full deliveries and yielded 28 runs. Nine of the 13 boundaries scored until tea came off full-length deliveries”.

In contrast, Mitchell Johnson bowled just pitched 14 deliveries on a fuller length four years ago while McGrath, Lee and Gillespie bowled lesser amount of fuller lengths than Johnson whenever they played at Brisbane.

Even Stuart Broad expressed his plans about bowling at Brisbane and he wished to go the McGrath way – no fuller length but landing on ideal length. He said, “I don’t want to swing it. That will be against my strengths to come here and bowl a full length looking to swing the Kookaburra. I want to do what McGrath and Hazlewood do, bashing away, bringing in both sides of the bat. I’ve done some good work and that will continue leading into the first Test. I feel like my time is coming”.

Moreover, the Australian pacers lacked aggression which was a big surprise for me. Starc displayed a killer instinct at Shield Cricket while Cummins’ aggression on the flat tracks of Dhaka and Chittagong hinted how lethal he would be on Australian pitches and Hazlewood’s McGrath-like-intent would have been an interesting thing to watch on Day 1. But astonishingly, all of them displayed a ‘just okay’ show –  no bone-chilling kinds of stuff were evident.


England were allowed to exhibit resolve.  

Note: This article is published at Cricketsoccer on 23/11/2017 Australian pacers were too easy to handle

Thank You
Faisal Caesar   

Monday, November 20, 2017

Eden Gardens, you beauty


Yet again, Eden Gardens did not dissatisfy the cricket followers. The City of Joy has always lived up to the expectations of fans and students of the great game. Be it a Test match or 50-over format, the wonderful Eden Gardens has dished out the kind of excitement for which one can skip the most romantic date with his or her love without a second thought. There is something special in Eden Gardens and it is made special by the think tanks of Bengal cricket.   

November 20, 2017. Day Five. The first Test was all set to meet a dull draw. But as usual, Kolkata did not frustarte the fans as the twenty two yards left all of us spell bound. Courtesy of a sporting track whose brain child was Prince of Kolkata, Sourav Ganguly.  

The first three days were hit by inclement weather but on a greenish track and overcast conditions, produced some thrilling stuffs which were quite unbelievable on the subcontinent. But Cricket Association of Bengal’s most prominent figure, Ganguly, thought of killing the boredom of flat and turning tracks and decided to unleash a track which allows more assistance to seam and swing bowlers.

Day 1 witnessed India to reel against Suranga Lakmal and co’s movement. Day 3 witnessed a gallant fight back from Sri Lanka’s tail and Day 4 witnessed India’s dominance with the bat.

On the final day, Virat Kohli scripted his 50th international hundred relying on his typical counterattacking abilities to give Sri Lanka a target to chase within 47 overs. As soon as Mohammed Shami and Bhuvneshwar Kumar rolled their arms, Sri Lanka experienced hell – the track had not lost its spice despite the sunshine and not even offered enough assistance for the spinners. It was all about pacers and a slip cordon which Clive Lloyd’s West Indies used to operate in the 80s.   

The Test match ended in a draw and it was a lucky escape for Sri Lanka, but the amount of drama Eden Gardens provided us, cannot be expressed in few words – it’s unmeasurable.
Had the track not been a sporting one, we might have experienced a dull end to the proceedings, but because of such a sporting track, we all could experience all four innings being played and the interference of weather became irrelevant.

Cricket Association of Bengal deserves a big thanks for such a cracking contest and like I said earlier in my post in Bengali, a lot depends of BCCI to inject life in Test cricket and it seems, they are doing just that.

Thank You
Faisal Caesar 

   

Friday, November 17, 2017

Surprised by the omission of Matt Renshaw and selection of Tim Paine, but.....


Omission of Matt Renshaw and picking Tim Paine haven’t not impress many, but Australia have the reputation of selecting players on form and not names. Eg. Steve Smith’s selection in Test side as a batsman when many thought his days as a Test cricketer was over while according to many, Steve was supposed to fill the boots of Shane Warne and not do the tasks with the willow. But Steve shut the mouths of all those who doubted his abilities as a top order batsman.

The same can be said about Matthew Hayden. Australia omitted Greg Blewett to make a room for Matthew Hayden. Hayden was performing very well domestic circuit than Belweet and Australian selectors like to invest faith in those who are in form and not the out-of-form customers who are going through a lean patch. Even, they did not care to omit Michael Slater during Ashes 2001 and play Justin Langer as an opener from number three to make space for Ricky Ponting in that position.

What Hayden, Langer and Ponting did in their batting positions, each and everyone is aware of it.    
  
We, the fans and critics, have our own expert opinion, liking and disliking, but we still have not been able to decipher the eyes of an Australian selector. What they see in a player and plan about him, we cannot understand.

A consistent performer in Sheild Cricket can never be underestimated as it’s not a place where someone like Tushar Imran and Shariar Nafees can score runs and hope for a call back in the national team.  


I am surprised by the omission of Renshaw and selection of Paine as a genuine wicketkeeper, but at the end of the day, I need to think, they were called back by the Australian selectors and they were judged on the performance in Shield Cricket. 

Thank You
Faisal Caesar 

হায় রে বিপিএল!

যে কোন টি২০ লীগ যে জুয়ার আসর ছাড়া আর কিছুই না সেটা সেই ২০০৯ সাল থেকেই বলে আসছি। আর বিপিএল নিয়ে কি বলব? যখন কাওকে এই থার্ড ক্লাস টুর্নামেন্টকে খুব হাইলাইট করতে দেখি তখন খুবই বিরক্ত হই। এরা জেনে শুনে একটি জুয়ার আসরকে কিভাবে প্রমোট করে?

প্রথম আলোর মতে, "এরই মধ্যে ৭৭ জন জুয়াড়িকে ধরেছে বিসিবি। এর মধ্যে বাংলাদেশের ৬৫ জন। ১২ বিদেশি জুয়াড়ির ১০ জনই ভারতীয়। সবাইকে পুলিশের কাছে তুলে দেওয়া হয়েছে। কিন্তু দেশে ক্রিকেট জুয়া নিয়ে আইন না থাকায় তাঁদের বিরুদ্ধে মামলা বা সাধারণ ডায়েরি করা যায়নি"।

দেখ অবস্থা! আরও কয়েকদিন পর তো বিপিএল নামক এই জুয়ার আসর নিয়ে টিনএজ বয়সের ইয়ো-ইয়ো জেনারেশনদের মধ্যে খুনাখুনি শুরু হয়ে যাবে।
আর, ক্রিকেট জুয়া নিয়ে যদি আইন না থাকে তাহলে সেটা কি প্রনয়ন করা যায় না? নাকি প্রণয়ন করার ইচ্ছে নেই।

বাংলাদেশ ক্রিকেটে বিপিএল নামক জুয়ার আসর এখন পর্যন্ত কি দিয়েছে? হ্যাঁ, আগে ম্যাচ ফিক্সিং-এ বাংলাদেশের নাম জড়ানো ছিল কিন্তু বিপিএলের কল্যাণে এটাও হয়ে গিয়েছে।


দেশপ্রেমের কথা তুলে জুয়াকে যারা প্রমোট করছে তারা মুখোশধারি শয়তান ছাড়া আর কিছুই না। কারন বিপিএলের জুয়ায় এরাও জড়িত আছে বলে মনে করি।

ধন্যবাদ 
ফয়সাল সিজার 

Thursday, November 16, 2017

ইডেন গার্ডেনের সবুজ উইকেট এবং কিছু কথা


আগামী বছরের শুরুতেই ভারত দক্ষিন আফ্রিকা সফরে যাবে ওখানকার উইকেট পেস বোলারদের সহায়ক হবে ভেবে ভারত নিজের দেশে সেরকম উইকেট তৈরি করেছে যেন দক্ষিন আফ্রিকার জন্য প্রস্তুতিটা এই সিরিজেই হয়ে যায় ভারতের এরকম চিন্তাকে স্বাগত জানাতেই হয় এই তো ২০১৩ সালেও দক্ষিন আফ্রিকা সফরের পূর্বে ভারতের এরকম প্রস্তুতি নিতে দেখা যায়নি ভারতের মাটিতে সুইং এবং সিম ফ্রেন্ডলি উইকেট? এটা ভাবাটা এক রকম বোকামি ছিল কিন্তু কালের প্রবাহে ভারতের সর্বত্র উন্নতির সাথে, সাথে ক্রিকেট কালচারে একটা আমূল পরিবর্তন লক্ষ্য করা গেছে এবং সেটি হলো একঘেয়েমি হোম কন্ডিশনের অবসান ঘটানোর প্রচেষ্টা

একটি দেশের ক্রিকেট কালচার বলুন কিংবা অর্থনীতি আর রাজনীতির কালচারই বলুন, সেখানে যখন সস্তা আবেগ এবং তৈল মর্দনকারীদের অতিমাত্রায় প্রশ্রয় না দিয়ে প্রাকটিক্যাল চিন্তধারার উপর জোর বেশী দেওয়া তখন স্বভাবতই সেই দেশে শিক্ষিত এবং ভিসিওনারী জনগোষ্ঠীরদের উদয় বেশী হবে এবং তাদেরকে সেরকম গুরুত্ব বেশী দেওয়া হয় এবং এই কোয়ালিটি জনগোষ্ঠীই দেশকে এগিয়ে নিয়ে যায় কারন এই জনগোষ্ঠী তেল মারা কিংবা শোআপ নয় বরং অর্থবহ কাজের উপর গুরুত্ব বেশী দেয়

***

আচ্ছা মনে করুন, আগামী বছর বাংলাদেশ দক্ষিন আফ্রিকা সফরে যাচ্ছে এখন যাবার পূর্বে দেশীয় সিরিজ জিম্বাবুয়ের সাথে বাংলাদেশ কি এরকম দুর্বল টেস্ট দলের সাথে পেস বোলারদের সহায়ক উইকেট বানাতে সাহস করবে? ওটা করা তো দূরের কথা, উল্টো হয়ত দেখা যাবে জিম্বাবুয়ের সাথে সিরিজ আয়োজনের জন্য নাজমুল হাসানের বাপ-দাদার চৌদ্দ গুষ্ঠি উদ্ধার করা হচ্ছে কিংবা সিরিজ হলেও পেস বলিং সহায়ক উইকেট বানানোর জন্য বিসিবিকেহোম কন্ডিশনঅবহেলার বরাত দিয়ে আবারও গুষ্ঠি উদ্ধার করা হবে এরকমটি হবে কারন আমাদের ক্রিকেট কালচার ব্যক্তি পূজা এবং অযোগ্যদের দখলে শুধু ক্রিকেট নয় এই দেশের অনেক কিছুই এরকম পাবলিকদের জয়জয়কার উদাহরনঃ মন্ত্রী পলক, মেয়র আনিসুল হক ইত্যাদি ইত্যাদি

***
ভারতে আমার বন্ধু এবং বান্ধবী দুটোই আছে ক্রিকেটের সূত্র ধরে এদের সাথে অনেক কাজ করার সুযোগ হয়েছে আমি এখনও এদের সাথেই কাজ করছি যতই ভারতীয়দের সাথে কাজ করছি ততই তাদের কাজের ইথিকাল দিক গুলো এবং জ্ঞানের গভীরতা দেখে, আমার বন্ধু এবং বান্ধবীদের উপর শ্রদ্ধা দিনের পর দিনে বেড়েই যাচ্ছে

এই যেমন, আমারই একজন পরিচিত কর্পোরেট, ক্রিকেট নিয়ে বই লিখেছেন এখন সে তার লিংক গুলোকে ব্যবহার করে অনেক নামিদামী লোক জড়ো করে তার বইয়ের মোড়ক উন্মোচনের অনুষ্ঠান করবেন বইয়ের রিভিউয়ের ব্যাপারে তারই ক্রিকেট লেখক বন্ধুদের তিনি রিকোয়েস্ট করেছেন আমি আশ্চর্য হয়ে দেখলাম, তার বন্ধুরা বইটির ব্যাপারে কোন ভালো রিভিউ দেয়নি কারন এসব ক্রিকেট লেখকদের মনে হয়েছে, তার বন্ধুর বইয়ে অনেক ফাঁকফোকর আছে এবং একটা এভারেজ জিনিসকে তারা প্রমোট করতে চায়নি কারন এটাতে তাদের ক্রিকেট কালচারের ক্ষতি হবে

এই ব্যাপারটি বাংলাদেশে কল্পনা করা অসম্ভব কোন অনুষ্ঠানে মাশরাফি এসে যদি বইয়ের মোড়ক উন্মোচন করে তাহলে সেই বই যতই বাজে হোক, সেটাকে জোর করে হলেও হিট করাতেই হবে কারন কালচার গরে উঠুক আর নাই উঠুক ব্যক্তি পূজা করা বেশী দরকার এবং লেখক যদি কোন কর্পোরেট জগতের হেভিওয়েট হন তাহলে তো কথাই নেই যাতা জিনিস প্রমোটেড হয়ে যাবে এবং বাংলাদেশে এরকম অহরহ হচ্ছে আর তাই আমরা একটা জায়গায় এসে থেমে আছি

***

আমি লক্ষ্য করেছি, একজন ভারতীয় সহজেই তাদের একটি চিন্তাকে অন্য কারও দ্বারা প্রভাবিত করতে দেয় না আপনি কিছু বললে তারা সেটা নিয়ে স্টাডি করবে এবং পরবর্তীতে যদি দেখে আপনার মতামত যুক্তিসংগত, তাহলে সে আপনাকে ধন্যবাদ বলে সহায়তা করার হাত বাড়িয়ে দেবে এটাই পরিণত কালচার একটি পরিণত কালচারই দেশকে এগিয়ে নিতে সাহায্য করে এবং কেই কংগ্রেস হোক আর বিজেপি হোক, এই পরিণত কালচারের লেগেসি সবাই ভালোভাবে মেইনটেন করছে


ভারতের উন্নতি কোন ম্যাজিক নয় বরং তারা বেসিক ব্যাপার গুলোর উপর গুরুত্ব দিয়েছে যেটা এত বছরেও আমরা দিতে শিখিনি একজন ভারতীয় দেশপ্রেমী এবং একজন বাংলাদেশী দেশপ্রেমিক কিন্তু ভারত বাংলাদেশীদের মত অন্ধ দেশপ্রেমিক না যে, ব্যক্তি পূজা এবং দলকানার খাতিরে সব ভুল হজম করে নিবেন   

ধন্যবাদ 
ফয়সাল সিজার