It’s better to talk about the joy of watching Mitchell Starc
rather than controversial matters.
Well, just less than twenty-four hours left for the second
Test to commence at Port Elizabeth. But the enthusiasm has been dented by the
David Warner and Quinton de Kock controversy. Be it in the print and electronic
media or social media, the analysis regarding this matter is still on and fans
and critics are dishing out various theories.
Who started it first? Who is the actual villain? Or how
gentler the cricketers should be? Such questions are asked repeatedly in
Facebook Groups which is triggering an ugly argument among the fans who’re
mostly neutrals. The comment section continues to increase in numbers and
attracting other young fans to join the bandwagon of arguments, which already
left the Australia and South African horizon to settle in an Indo-Pak clash.
Fans and critics always forget cricket has never been a
gentleman’s game. Aggression and mental intimidation have always been a part
and parcel of this game. Of course, there always has to have a limit, but do
you think, any sports can survive without that ultra-dose of aggression? You
don’t want any sports to be boring, do you?
***
Somewhere in the Facebook Group or newspaper, Mitchell Starc
could occupy some space for his enthralling exhibition of reverse-swing on the
slow, low and abrasive surface of Durban. The situation is similar like the
summer of 1992 when Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis’ devastating display of
reverse-swing crushed England at their own backyard, but as, the torchbearer of
cricket’s traditional thinker, England did not accept it. Anything unorthodox
is an enemy of traditions and when you fail to decipher it, it is a black
magic!
Wasim swung it from round and over the wicket while Waqar
crushed toes at Lord’s and Oval, by making the old ball swing late at an
astonishing pace. But, the English media and some of the ex-cricketers ignored
the excellence of 2Ws and overshadowed their skilful display with hate
statements. The newspapers were loaded with controversial news rather than
Wasim and Waqar’s brilliance.
Thirteen years later, a certain Andrew Flintoff and Simone
Jones would mesmerize the all-conquering Australian side to break the Ashes
jinx. England did not tag reverse-swing as a black magic in 2005, but were left
praising about the brilliant exponents of this art – Sarfraz Nawaz, Imran Khan,
Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis.
“Reverse-swing is an art,” this statement of Waqar Younis in
1994 has been accepted by the cricketing world and at present, on modern-day
tracks, which is more suited to batters and spinners to an extent, for the
pacers, the so-called black magic has become a must-skill to bag wickets.
Two of cricket’s traditional rivals, Australia and England, utilizing
this art at its maximum best.
***
Anyhow, in 1992, as a school kid, the display of amazing 2Ws
attracted me more than the filthy controversies. Similarly, twenty-six years
later, I am absolutely amazed by Mitchell Starc’s skill with the old ball. At
Durban, when he came round the wicket to fire the old cherry straight into the
blockhole from an acute angle, the sight was one to relish for a fan like me,
who could forget anyone and everything for such spectacular moments.
Starc’s run-up is not something like Imran Khan, Wasim,
Waqar, Shoaib Akhtar or Dennis Lillee to trigger the rush of adrenaline, nor
does he has that killer-look like a an Andy Roberts or a Sylvester Clarke to
instill fear in the hearts of a batsman, but as soon as the old red-ball leaves
his hand, while bowling round the wicket, after completing all the complex
mechanism of a bowling action, it’s a story of thrill-and-chill.
The old red-ball starts to move in the air at pace, giving
the impression of going towards middle and leg, but at the last moment, it
changes its direction to the utter astonishment of batsmen and lands at the base
of middle and offstump to disturb the woodwork. For me, the sound of a ball
breaking the stump is as sweet as the ball kissing the middle of the bat. The
sound is generated because of the sheer skill of the pace bowler on a slow and
low deck. It’s never easy to create a hole in the defence of a Test batsman,
but a skilful speed-merchant can break the wall with his art.
Starc can swing the new ball by holding it with an upright
seam, but for me, he is not a treat to watch with the new cherry. Yes, when the
ball moves on a fresh deck, definitely, it leaves me in all praise for the
pacer, but when a pacer moves the old ball, it outweighs the joy of watching a
conventional swing bowling. Very few can do such as this a tough art to master.
Thankfully, Starc is one of the best exponents of reverse-swing at present in
the absence of Dale Steyn.
***
Now, the choice is up to you. Do you wish to relish the
moments gifted by cricketers like Starc or keep your brain busy with
Warner-de-Kock debate? I preferred to talk about Starc with my friends rather
than the controversial subjects. It’s very important for me to enjoy the beauty
of this game. I decided to watch the videos of Starc’s reverse-swing display
from round the wicket before the second Test. F you wish, you can join me!
Note: This article has been posted at Cricketsoccer on Calm down and enjoy Mitchell Starc
Thank You
Faisal Caesar
No comments:
Post a Comment