For a footballing nation that has come to represent inevitability, there was something almost surreal about how Germany's 2018 World Cup campaign came to an end: not with fury, nor resistance, nor even heartbreak—but with a shrug. The skies didn’t thunder, the stands didn’t wail. Instead, in the mild afternoon sun of Kazan, an empire crumbled with barely a tremor. There was no Sturm. There was no Drang.
Germany,
four-time world champions and reigning holders, exited the group stage for the
first time in 80 years. A tournament they entered not just as champions, but as
Confederations Cup winners—with a ‘B team’ no less—ended with a 2-0 defeat to
South Korea, a team already eliminated and historically inconsistent. If
history repeats itself, this one came not as tragedy or farce, but as something
more inert: the silent breakdown of a machine that once ran too perfectly to
notice its own decay.
A Disassembly of Myth
Germany
arrived in Russia bearing the sheen of systematic excellence. Their youth academy
overhaul was envied globally. Their talent conveyor belt, seemingly endless.
Their depth so vast that Leroy Sané, one of the Premier League’s most electric
players at the time, was left at home. But when called upon to score a single
goal—against a South Korea side that had lost to Sweden, Mexico, China, and
Qatar—Germany struggled to create so much as a coherent chance.
In the end,
VAR sealed their fate, correctly awarding Kim Young-Gwon’s goal after it was
revealed that the ball had come off Toni Kroos. The final act—the ultimate
ignominy—was pure absurdity: Manuel Neuer, playing as an auxiliary midfielder,
lost possession far upfield, allowing Son Heung-Min to sprint onto a long
clearance and roll the ball into an empty net. A sweeper-keeper turned
tragicomic figure, Neuer’s demise was football’s cruel joke on its former
innovator.
No Collapse, Just Erosion
Unlike
Spain’s catastrophic implosion in 2014 or France’s meltdown in 2002, Germany’s
exit bore no dramatic singularity. There was no 5–1 drubbing, no mutiny, no
narrative peak. It was instead a steady, grey unravelling—a tournament defined
by bluntness, timidity, and unearned certainty. Their only win came via a
95th-minute wonder strike against Sweden. The rest was static.
Mats Hummels’s
skewed header in the 87th minute—eight yards out, unchallenged, and somehow
sent shoulder-wide—was symbolic. Germany didn’t just lose; they forgot how to
be Germany.
Low's Miscalculations and the Echoes of 2012
Joachim
Löw's selections echoed errors past. Reinstating Mesut Özil and Sami Khedira
for the South Korea match, after their exclusion from the Sweden game, hinted
not at flexibility but indecision. Thomas Müller, long off-form, was finally
benched—the first time he had missed a tournament start since 2012. Neuer,
meanwhile, started all three matches despite not playing for Bayern Munich
since the previous autumn. His form was uncertain; his decision-making, worse.
Low’s
refusal to rotate aggressively or abandon a faltering 4-2-3-1 setup displayed a
conservatism incompatible with his squad’s condition. Against South Korea, the
gegenpress returned in part, denying counters—but at the cost of any attacking
spontaneity. Germany's famed balance between rigor and invention never
materialized. By the time Goretzka’s flicked header drew a save from Jo
Hyun-woo early in the second half, it was already too late.
The Keeper, the Cult Hero, and the Cartoonish
Ending
Cho
Hyun-Woo, South Korea’s surprise No.1, became an unlikely cult hero. Initially
selected for his height—his manager obsessed over Sweden’s aerial threat—he
ended the tournament as a viral icon, nicknamed “Dae-hair,” a pun on David de
Gea. Against Germany, he looked every bit the world-beater, saving six of 26
shots, many of which were tame, misplaced, or panicked.
Germany had
26 attempts, six on target—numbers that masked the lack of conviction behind
them. They played not like world champions, but like students scrambling to
finish a week-long assignment the night before its deadline.
The Big Bad Wolf, Defanged
Germany’s
historical role has often been to end fairytales: to smother romance with
ruthless order. In 1974, it was the Dutch and Total Football. In 2014, it was
Brazil and their dream of redemption. But in 2018, the wolf had lost its teeth.
They huffed and puffed but could not topple South Korea’s straw house.
Low’s
loyalty to experience over form echoed his Euro 2012 decisions, when he trusted
an aging core against Italy. Then, as now, he placed faith in names rather than
performances, and the cost was terminal.
What Comes Next?
This was
not merely a bad tournament; it was the consequence of creeping stagnation.
Germany’s sixth-youngest squad masked internal contradictions: overreliance on
fading stars, tactical inertia, and a leadership core that no longer led. For a
nation steeped in rationalism, post-mortems will be meticulous. No doubt the
German press will dissect the campaign with the cold logic of Gödel, Escher,
and Bach. Some might even commit the ultimate insult—comparing Germany to England’s
lost years: a team of egos and illusions, rather than purpose and preparation.
But there
is, too, in this collapse, a familiar thread. Germany, more than most nations,
has shown a remarkable capacity for reinvention. The same system that bred
complacency is also capable of deep reform. It will ask the hard questions.
It will
find answers.
But as the
curtain fell in Kazan, twilight did not descend on champions—it fell on gods
who forgot they could bleed.
Thank You
Faisal Caesar

No comments:
Post a Comment