“In this age of neutral umpires and technology, if the
poor decisions crop up time and again, then their credibility comes under
scrutiny, which is not good for the game”
In 1988, Imran Khan’s Pakistan was well set to bring an end
to mighty West Indies’ more-than-a-decade-long dominance in Test cricket.
Imran’s men started off the Test series as underdogs and quite astonishingly,
they took a lead in the series and maintained that lead until the fourth day of
the final Test. But on the final day, some poor umpiring denied Imran of
creating history. West Indies went on to level the series despite reeling at
207 for 8, while chasing 262 runs in fouth innings.
Abdul Qadir said to ESPNcricinfo, “After Wasim had got rid
of Ambrose and Richards, I had Marshall plumb lbw on the back foot to a
flipper, but the umpire turned down the appeal”. Qadir further added, “I
thought Pakistan were a bit unlucky not to have got the benefit of that Dujon
bat-and-pad catch. I thought that towards the end of the match, the umpire was
no-balling me unnecessarily, allowing Benjamin to go for big shots”.
Javed Miandad in his autobiography wrote, “We would
have wrapped up the game, but a couple of crucial umpiring decisions robbed us
of victory. We would have been successful if it was not for the poor umpiring
that spoilt our chances in the end”.
Imran was crestfallen after that defeat at Barbados, which
he thought, Pakistan were robbed of a victory. At Lahore, almost six months
ago, in that eventful semi-final clash against Australia during World Cup 1987,
another dubious decision against Imran by the renowned Dickie Bird, disturbed a
famous come back from Pakistan. Australia would not only stun the local crowd,
but would stun the world by lifting the trophy for the first time and start the
beginning of a new era in Australian cricket.
Fast forward to 1999 at Hobart, where Steve Waugh’s men were
finding the going tough against Wasim Akram’s Pakistan. Australia were five
down and at the crease, Justin Langer – a struggling customer and one-Test old
Adam Gilchrist were facing the heat of the best attack in the world to chase
down 369 – quite an impossible task from 126 for 5.
Shortly after Pakistan had taken the new ball on Day 5,
Justin Langer, on 76, appeared clearly to have snicked one to wicketkeeper Moin
Khan off Wasim Akram but 'home' umpire Parker ruled that not out. Australia's
total then was 5 for 237. Wasim lost her temper and so the Pakistani players on
the field lost their motivation. That wicket could have changed everything, but
in turn, it helped Australia to script a world record 16-Test-victory on a
trot. Whereas, Pakistan returned home demoralized, with Akram losing his
captaincy once and for all.
There are many such crucial decisions in the history of Test
cricket, which led to hamper the rhythm of a team and deny them from a victory.
Above all, they simply dented the morale of the game and thus, killed the joy
of watching a Test match.
Since Imran became the captain of Pakistan, he had been
vocal about neutral umpires and the use of technology in cricket. It took a
while for ICC to realise the importance of Imran’s words and at present,
cricket witnesses neutral umpires in Test matches and utilization of modern
technology at its best. Even though neutral umpires and technology have
benefited teams to a great extent, but in the critical junctures of Test
matches, the ghost of Barbados or Hobart tends to revisit.
That ghost revisited at Centurion on Day 3 of first Test
between Pakistan and South Africa. South Africa needed 149 runs to win on a
deck, which was a pretty tough one to counter. Yes, for a team like South
Africa, chasing 149 would not be a big deal, but on such a spicy deck and
against the mercurial bowling attack of Pakistan, it was expected to be a
tricky chase. And in the morning session, the Pakistani pacers struck gold
pretty early and the home team could have been two down pretty soon had the
television umpire not disappointed.
In the fifth ball of ninth over of the day, Dean Elgar edged
one towards slip, where Azhar Ali took a low catch. The on-field umpire wanted
to be fully assured about the catch and went upstairs. But before going
upstairs, the on-field umpire’s soft signal was out.
Now, an umpire gives a soft signal about what he is thinking
and that becomes a very important part in decision-making. If the umpire’s soft
signal is out, the first primitive decision is out. If the 3rd umpire doesn't
find conclusive evidence of ball hitting the ground or not, the benefit of
doubt is given the umpire’s decision and is termed out. The same applies when a
decision is referred. The ratio is 60:40 for umpires call. If the ball hits the
leg, off or top of stumps, the ratio of contact and umpires decision comes into
play.
Azhar Ali’s catch was low and even the video evidence
showed, the ball touched Ali’s fingers and not the ground. But to the utter
astonishment of on-field umpire, television commentators and Pakistani players,
the television umpire – Joel Wilson – turned down the decision. Elgar was saved
and Pakistan lost their morale.
A century partnership was scripted between Elgar and Hashim
Amla and when it was breached, South Africa lost two more wickets quickly, but
it was too late for Pakistan to strike back. South Africa have taken a lead.
0 for 1
119 for 2
136 for 2
137 for 4
Just imagine the situation if Elgar was dismissed. South
Africa would have been 16 for 2 as Pakistan could have spiced things up and
made the Test a lot more interesting. But a bad decision simply killed all the
thrills of a contest, which offered so much.
Maybe, the talk would more about Pakistan’s poor batting
display, Imam-ul-Haq and his uncle and Sarfraz Ahmed’s credibility as the captain,
but somewhere, I feel, Pakistan still could have pulled off something special
if that decision did not go against them.
Elgar was out and that’s what I feel and even the great
Graeme Smith felt the same.
In this age of neutral umpires and technology, if the poor
decisions crop up time and again, then their credibility comes under scrutiny,
which is not good for the game.
Note: This article has bene published at Cricketsoccer on 28/12/2018 Dean Elgar was OUT, credibility of ‘modern day’ umpiring comes under scrutiny…..yet again
Thank You
Faisal Caesar
No comments:
Post a Comment