Friday, January 29, 2021

South Africa’s Return to Pakistan: A Tale of Resurgence, Redemption, and Resilience - Clinical Pakistan in Karachi

 

After more than thirteen years, South Africa returned to Pakistan—a land known for its rich tapestry of music, vibrant cities, and cricket as unpredictable as its poetry. Their last tour in 2007 was marked by triumph and tears: the Proteas won the Test series, and Pakistan bid an emotional farewell to the legendary Inzamam-ul-Haq, who retired from the format amidst an outpouring of emotion. 

In the intervening years, Pakistan endured a cricketing exile. A decade passed without international cricket gracing its soil, a barren stretch that tested the nation’s spirit. But like a phoenix, Pakistan cricket has risen from the ashes. Teams have begun to return, and the South African tour signals a revival that promises visits from England, New Zealand, and Australia shortly. 

The Fortress Awakens: Karachi’s National Stadium 

The first Test was hosted at Karachi’s iconic National Stadium (NSK), a venue steeped in history and reverence. For nearly four decades, NSK was Pakistan’s fortress, a stage for legendary battles and unforgettable moments. The sight of a top-tier Test team competing in whites once again under its sunlit skies was as heartwarming as it was symbolic. 

South African captain Quinton de Kock, winning the toss, opted to bat—a decision rooted in the expectation that the pitch would deteriorate as the game progressed. Yet, history at NSK has often favoured teams chasing, a nuance De Kock perhaps underestimated. 

South Africa’s Batting Struggles 

The visitors faltered on Day 1. The pitch, still good for batting, offered little turn, but South Africa’s batters succumbed to deliveries that barely deviated. Only Faf du Plessis fell to a genuinely turning ball from Yasir Shah, a delivery that drifted and spun away to catch the edge. The rest of the dismissals reflected poor shot selection and a lack of application. 

Their total of 220 was underwhelming, but late on Day 1, South Africa’s pacers breathed life into the contest, reducing Pakistan to 33 for four. For a brief moment, 220 seemed like a fighting total. 

The Fawad Alam Story: Redemption at Last 

Enter Fawad Alam, a man whose journey epitomizes perseverance. Overlooked for more than a decade despite a stellar domestic record, Fawad’s unorthodox technique was deemed unsuitable for international cricket. The presence of stalwarts like Misbah-ul-Haq, Younis Khan, Azhar Ali, and Asad Shafiq further crowded him out. 

Yet, Fawad never wavered. During his 11-year hiatus, he amassed 26 first-class centuries and 7965 runs at an average of 56.48, a testament to his resilience and hunger. Recalled in 2020, he has since silenced his doubters with performances that combine grit and elegance. 

In Karachi, under immense pressure, Fawad crafted a masterful century, rescuing Pakistan from the brink at 33 for four. His partnerships with Azhar Ali (94), Mohammad Rizwan (55), and Faheem Ashraf (102) not only erased South Africa’s modest lead but also built a formidable one for Pakistan. 

Nauman Ali: The Unsung Hero 

While Fawad garnered well-deserved accolades, the debutant Nauman Ali quietly scripted his own fairytale. At 34, an age when most cricketers are contemplating retirement, Nauman made his Test debut. Hailing from the small town of Khipro in Sindh, his journey to the national team was marked by years of toil in domestic cricket. 

Nauman’s discipline and mastery of line and length were on full display in Karachi. Operating as the second spinner to Yasir Shah, he bowled with the poise of a veteran, extracting bounce and turn with subtle variations. His five-wicket haul in the second innings was instrumental in dismantling South Africa’s resistance. 

The Fall of the Proteas 

South Africa’s second innings began with resolve, but Pakistan’s spinners soon tightened their grip. Aiden Markram stood tall, but Nauman’s persistence paid off when he used his height to extract extra bounce, forcing Markram into an error. 

Temba Bavuma and George Linde fought valiantly, but Nauman’s guile proved too much. A well-flighted delivery kissed Linde’s edge, and a sharp turn breached Kagiso Rabada’s extravagant drive. Nauman completed his five-wicket haul by trapping Bavuma in front, leaving Pakistan a modest target of 88 runs. 

 A Triumph of Spirit 

The victory was comprehensive, but it was the individual stories that elevated the match to a narrative of triumph and redemption. Fawad Alam, the epitome of persistence, delivered under pressure. Nauman Ali, the late bloomer, proved that age is but a number when paired with determination. And Yasir Shah, the seasoned magician, reminded the cricketing world of his enduring brilliance. 

For Pakistan, this win was more than just a step toward reclaiming their cricketing heritage—it was a celebration of resilience, a testament to the power of perseverance, and a promise of brighter days ahead. 

As South Africa departs, the smiles of Fawad and Nauman linger as symbols of what Pakistan cricket stands for: a relentless pursuit of excellence against all odds. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Thursday, January 28, 2021

James Anderson: The Ageless Maestro and His Eternal Love Affair with Test Cricket

 

At the age of 38, James Anderson continues to defy the laws of time and physiology, standing as a testament to the art of fast bowling in an era increasingly dominated by batters. His recent exploits in Galle, where he claimed his 30th five-wicket haul in Test cricket, reaffirm his status as a freak of nature—one who seems to age like fine wine, refining his craft with every passing year. 

Anderson's six-wicket haul in the second Test against Sri Lanka not only broke records but also redefined them. No seamer has ever taken a five-wicket haul at his age, surpassing the legendary Sir Richard Hadlee, who last achieved the feat at 37 years and 145 days. The conditions at Galle—oppressively humid, with a deck offering scant assistance to seamers—only added to the magnitude of Anderson's accomplishment. It was a performance steeped in skill, resilience, and a deep respect for the nuances of Test cricket. 

Anderson vs. Steyn: A Rivalry Revisited 

For years, cricketing debates have oscillated between James Anderson and Dale Steyn, two of the finest seamers of their generation. While Steyn often held the edge in terms of records in foreign conditions, particularly in Asia, injuries curtailed his career. Anderson, in contrast, has weathered the storm, amassing over 600 Test wickets in an era where rules, pitches, and even the bats have tilted heavily in favor of batters.  

What sets Anderson apart is his persistence and adaptability. His ability to evolve with the game, mastering reverse swing and subtle variations, has allowed him to thrive even as others faded away. His continued success is not just a celebration of his skill but also a tribute to his unwavering commitment to the longest format of the game. 

The Galle Triumph: A Seamer’s Paradise 

The second Test at Galle was a rarity in Sri Lankan cricket history. For the first time since 2001, all ten wickets in an innings were claimed by seamers—a testament to the skill and determination of England's pacers on typically spin-friendly tracks. Anderson's performance was the linchpin of this success, his ability to extract life from an unyielding surface standing as a masterclass in seam bowling. 

Anderson and India: A Storied Rivalry 

As Anderson prepares to travel to India, a nation where cricket is both religion and theatre, he faces a challenge that has historically been considered the ultimate test for any bowler. Success in the Ashes might bring more adulation in England, but it is against India that Anderson has truly shone. 

With 110 wickets in 27 Tests against India at an average of 25.98, Anderson has been a nemesis for generations of Indian batters. His record in India, 26 wickets in 10 Tests at an average of 33.46, may not seem extraordinary, but numbers often fail to capture the impact of a bowler who thrives on guile and precision. 

Anderson’s memorable performances in India include his four-wicket hauls in Nagpur and Mumbai during the 2006 series, which helped England level the contest. In 2012, his incisive spells on rank turners in Kolkata played a pivotal role in England's historic series win. Even during England’s drubbing in the 2016-17 tour, Anderson’s skill remained evident, though overshadowed by the team’s collective failure. 

The Kohli Conundrum 

Anderson’s rivalry with Virat Kohli has been one of the most captivating duels in modern cricket. In 2014, Anderson exposed Kohli’s vulnerabilities outside the off-stump, dismissing him four times as the Indian skipper averaged a meagre 13.4. But Kohli returned in 2018 as a transformed batsman, leaving Anderson and his peers in awe. 

Reflecting on Kohli’s evolution, Anderson noted, “He left the ball really well in 2018. In 2014, he chased the outswinger early on, but in 2018, he was patient and waited for the bowler to come to him. His mental approach and technique were significantly better.” 

The upcoming series in India presents yet another chapter in this storied rivalry. For Anderson, it is not just about dismissing Kohli but also about proving that age is no barrier to excellence. 

The Science Behind Anderson’s Art 

Sachin Tendulkar, the master batsman who faced Anderson in his prime, once revealed the secret behind the Englishman’s success. According to Tendulkar, Anderson’s ability to bowl a “reverse outswinger” with the wrist position of a conventional inswinger made him nearly unplayable. 

“Anderson was possibly the first to bowl reverse swing also reverse,” Tendulkar explained. “He would hold the ball as if bowling an outswinger but, at the release point, would make it come back in. It forced the batsman to commit to a shot, only for the ball to move away late.”  

Such innovations underline Anderson’s genius and his relentless pursuit of perfection. 

The Final Frontier 

For Anderson, the upcoming series in India is more than just another assignment—it is a chance to conquer the ultimate challenge. Beating India in their backyard is the holy grail of Test cricket, a feat achieved by only a handful of teams. With India riding high on confidence after their historic series win in Australia, the task is monumental. 

But Anderson is no stranger to adversity. Over the years, he has learned to adapt, to endure, and to excel in conditions that test the mettle of even the greatest. As he prepares to take the field in India, the cricketing world watches in anticipation, knowing that James Anderson is far from done. 

At 38, Anderson remains the embodiment of Test cricket’s enduring charm—a player who thrives on the purity of the contest, who respects the game enough to keep reinventing himself, and who inspires a generation to believe that age is just a number. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Tuesday, January 26, 2021

West Indies Toir of Bangladesh: What is the Purpose of West Indies in Bangladesh?


In a world still grappling with the shadow of the COVID-19 pandemic, cricket has served as a bridge to normalcy, a reminder of shared passions amid global uncertainties. For Bangladesh, the return of international cricket, albeit under stringent health protocols, offered a sense of purpose. However, the West Indies tour of Bangladesh in early 2021 was far from the competitive spectacle that fans might have hoped for. 

A Depleted Side and the Shadow of Doubt 

The West Indies arrived in Bangladesh with a squad that could, at best, be described as makeshift. Ten of their frontline players, including stalwarts like Jason Holder, Kieron Pollard, and Shai Hope, opted out due to COVID-19 concerns or personal reasons. The void left by these absences was glaring, and while coach Phil Simmons and stand-in captain Jason Mohammed spoke optimistically about the tour, their words struggled to mask the reality of the situation. 

The squad was a blend of untested talents and journeymen, with several players earning maiden call-ups. The Test team, led by Kraigg Brathwaite, and the ODI side, captained by Mohammed, carried the weight of expectations that seemed insurmountable given their lack of experience. 

The ODI Series: A Sobering Reality 

From the outset, the ODI series highlighted the disparity between the two sides. Bangladesh, buoyed by the return of stalwarts like Shakib Al Hasan and Mushfiqur Rahim, outclassed the visitors in every department. The opening match in Dhaka set the tone: six West Indies players made their ODI debuts, and the team folded meekly, managing only 122 runs—a target Bangladesh chased down with ease. 

The second and third ODIs followed a similar script, with Bangladesh clinching a 3-0 series win. The Tigers displayed clinical efficiency, but the lack of resistance from the West Indies rendered their victories hollow. The Caribbean side's performance was characterized by brittle batting, toothless bowling, and a lack of intensity—a far cry from the swagger and resilience that once defined West Indies cricket. 

Questions of Intent and Commitment 

The West Indies’ lacklustre showing raised uncomfortable questions about their priorities. Was this tour merely an obligation, a box to tick in the ICC Super League? The absence of key players, coupled with the underwhelming performances of those who did take the field, suggested a troubling indifference to the longer formats of the game. 

Jason Mohammed, in his pre-series remarks, spoke of leading a young and exciting group. Yet, the promise of emerging talent was nowhere to be seen. The team’s body language betrayed a lack of hunger, and their cricketing execution bordered on amateurish. For a side that once dominated world cricket, the display in Bangladesh was nothing short of a travesty. 

The Legacy of West Indies Cricket 

The West Indies' decline in the longer formats is not a new narrative, but the tour of Bangladesh underscored the depths to which they have sunk. The legendary Clive Lloyd, a symbol of the Caribbean’s golden era, has often spoken about the need for discipline, pride, and commitment to the badge. Yet, those qualities were conspicuously absent in Dhaka and Chattogram. 

For Bangladesh, the series served as a warm-up for tougher assignments ahead. But for the West Indies, it was a sobering reminder of their cricketing reality. The ODI Super League, designed to add context to bilateral series, demands consistency and competitiveness. By fielding a third-tier side, the West Indies not only jeopardized their chances of direct qualification for the 2023 World Cup but also undermined the integrity of the competition. 

Looking Ahead: The Test Series and Beyond 

The Test series loomed as an opportunity for redemption. Kraigg Brathwaite and his men had the chance to restore some pride and show that the West Indies still value the traditional format. The challenge, however, was steep. Bangladesh, emboldened by their ODI triumph, were unlikely to relent, and the onus was on the visitors to rise above their limitations. 

The words of Clive Lloyd and other Caribbean greats should serve as a rallying cry for this generation of West Indies cricketers. The legacy they inherit is one of dominance, flair, and resilience. To honour that legacy, they must embrace the hard yards, whether on the spinning tracks of Bangladesh or the seaming pitches of England. 

A Call for Reflection 

The West Indies tour of Bangladesh was more than a series; it was a litmus test for the region’s cricketing ethos. The results were disappointing, but the lessons are invaluable. Cricket in the Caribbean has always been about more than just the game—it is a reflection of the region’s identity, spirit, and unity. To reclaim their place in the cricketing world, the West Indies must find a way to balance the allure of T20 leagues with the demands of international cricket. 

For now, the memories of Dhaka and Chattogram linger as a painful reminder of what was lost. But within those memories lies the potential for a renaissance—if only the West Indies are willing to seize it. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Root Reigns Supreme: A Masterclass in Galle

 

The United Kingdom, a nation buffeted by the relentless waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, has found solace in its twin obsessions: football and cricket. While the Premier League dazzles with its weekly drama, cricket, the sport of English summers, provides a more meditative escape. And in early 2021, as the spectre of a new virus strain loomed, Joe Root offered the beleaguered British cricket faithful a masterclass of resilience and artistry on the spinning tracks of Sri Lanka.

The Pandemic Backdrop and England’s Cricketing Mission

For England, the series against Sri Lanka was more than a contest; it was a crucial prelude to their much-anticipated tour of India, a place that has become a litmus test for cricketing excellence. Sri Lanka, weakened and inconsistent, seemed more an obstacle than a true adversary, but the subcontinental pitches were no less treacherous. Enter Joe Root, England’s talismanic captain, whose recent form had sparked doubts among critics.

Since taking over as skipper, Root's batting average had faltered, inviting comparisons with his peers—Virat Kohli, Kane Williamson, and Steve Smith—all of whom seemed to thrive under the burden of leadership. Galle, however, witnessed the re-emergence of a cricketer who once seemed destined for greatness, and by the end of the two-Test series, Root had not just silenced his doubters; he had redefined the art of batting against spin.

The Galle Gambit: Root’s Tactical Brilliance

The first Test at Galle began with Sri Lanka folding for a modest total. England's reply faltered early, but Root's entrance at the crease signalled a transformation. With a calmness that belied the pressure, he navigated the turn and bounce of a surface that confounded most others. The sweep shot became his signature weapon, a stroke executed with such precision and frequency that it evoked memories of Graham Gooch’s epic knock in Mumbai, in 1987.

Root’s double century in the first Test was a testament to his tactical adaptability and technical refinement. His trigger movement, a subtle shift back and across, prevented him from being squared up by sharp turners. By opening his stance slightly, he enhanced his ability to counter deliveries pitching on or outside off-stump, allowing his bat to come down straighter and more decisively.

Sri Lanka’s spinners, led by the industrious Lasith Embuldeniya, probed with discipline. Yet Root’s response—built on rotation of strike, occasional boundaries, and unerring judgment—was a masterclass in nullifying pressure. The statistics told part of the story: Root faced 291 balls for his 228, scoring 54% of England’s first-innings runs. But the visual narrative was more compelling. Every sweep, every deft placement, underscored his supreme confidence and control.

Sustained Brilliance: The Second Test

Root’s hunger for runs was undiminished in the second Test, where he again carried England’s batting on his shoulders. On a pitch that turned even more viciously, his application and temperament shone through. Despite the energy-sapping heat and humidity, he amassed another century and was only denied a second double-ton of the series by an unfortunate run-out. His aggregate of 426 runs across the two matches accounted for an astonishing 44.4% of England’s total runs—an achievement that placed him among the greats of the game.

A Captain’s Evolution

Root’s resurgence as a batsman coincided with a noticeable maturity in his captaincy. In his own words, the enforced break during the pandemic had given him time to reflect and refine. His understanding of spin—both as a batsman and a tactician—was evident in his field placements, bowling changes, and the way he orchestrated England’s dominance.

Technically, Root’s batting adjustments were subtle but significant. His compact back-lift and quicker pick-up allowed him to stay balanced and respond to sharp turn with precision. The front shoulder engaged more effectively, and his footwork—both forward and back—was decisive. These changes ensured that Root not only survived but thrived in conditions that exposed lesser techniques.

A Glimpse of What’s to Come

The series against Sri Lanka was a prologue to the sterner test awaiting England in India. Root’s performances suggested that he had rediscovered his form and his love for the challenge. The statistics—his double-centuries, strike rotation, record-breaking sweep shots—offered a quantitative measure of his brilliance. Yet, it was the qualitative aspects—the composure under pressure, the artistry against spin, the ability to inspire his team—that truly marked his return to the pantheon of cricketing greats.

For England, the hope is that this rejuvenated Root can lead them to new heights in India and beyond. For cricket lovers, his performances in Galle were a reminder of the beauty and complexity of Test cricket—a format where class, patience, and strategy converge to create something timeless.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar  

Saturday, January 23, 2021

The Fall of the Gabbatoir: A Literary and Analytical Perspective

 

In 1987, an unfancied Australian cricket team led by Allan Border and guided by coach Bob Simpson defied all odds to lift the Reliance World Cup. Against the backdrop of a packed Eden Gardens, the Australians arrived as no-hopers but left as champions, overcoming heavyweights like India, Pakistan, and England. Yet, despite this triumph, that Australian unit was still a work in progress. Subsequent defeats to Pakistan and the West Indies, both away and at home, reflected their vulnerability, with losses at Brisbane and Melbourne considered routine during that era.

The transformation of Australian cricket began in the mid-1990s. Brisbane, once a site of occasional Australian defeats, became a fortress, while the Boxing Day Tests at Melbourne evolved into a symbol of Australian dominance. The aura of invincibility passed from the West Indies in 1995, defined Australian cricket for nearly two decades. Yet, as the years progressed, even this dominance began to exhibit cracks. By the time India’s young, injury-ridden team breached Brisbane’s fortress in January 2021, Australia’s long-held supremacy at these iconic venues had been reduced to mere memory.

The Decline of Australian Mentality

The last time Australia stumbled through a home Test without a single batsman scoring fifty was against the mighty West Indies at the MCG in 1988. Similarly, their last defeat at Brisbane, in the same year, was also against the West Indies. Those losses were acceptable; they came against a team that epitomized dominance. But losing to an Indian side decimated by injuries, relying heavily on its bench strength, raises serious questions about Australia’s temperament—a team once synonymous with mental toughness, ruthlessness, and professionalism.

India’s ignominious collapse at Adelaide, where Australian pacers breathed fire, could have set the tone for a dominant series. Yet, after that eventful session, Australia’s bowling unit inexplicably lost its aggression and precision. Among the four frontline bowlers, consistency was elusive; when one bowler stepped up, the others let the pressure dissipate. The famed Spartan line and length, the hallmark of Australian fast bowling, appeared only sporadically.

More glaring was the failure of the Australian batting unit. Steve Smith, the lynchpin of their lineup, was uncharacteristically out of form. Marnus Labuschagne squandered starts, David Warner played recklessly, and the rest of the batting order faltered against an inexperienced Indian attack. There was a palpable lack of intent, patience, and grit—qualities once emblematic of Australian cricket. The batsmen’s execution of shots lacked confidence, and their shoulders slumped under pressure, a far cry from the defiance shown during Border and Simpson’s rebuilding era.

Leadership Under Scrutiny

Tim Paine’s captaincy was emblematic of Australia’s struggles. Where Allan Border galvanized his team with proactive leadership, Paine appeared reactive and indecisive. His inability to maintain composure under pressure—evident in his verbal spats and tactical missteps—highlighted the erosion of Australia’s mental intimidation. Rather than unsettling the Indians, Paine’s approach seemed to embolden them.

The decision to target the body rather than attack the stumps, especially the top of off, was a tactical blunder. This approach, uncharacteristic of Australian greats like Glenn McGrath and Jason Gillespie, allowed Indian batsmen to settle and frustrate the bowlers. Greg Chappell aptly noted in the Sydney Morning Herald that the Gabba pitch, traditionally known for its bounce and pace, resembled a T20 track rather than the “Gabbatoir” of old. This misreading of conditions compounded Australia’s woes.

A Series of Missed Opportunities

Shane Warne’s critique encapsulated Australia’s failures. “Australia had so many chances in this series to bury it and crush India, but they couldn’t do it,” he remarked. Ricky Ponting echoed this sentiment, expressing shock at Australia’s inability to defeat what was essentially an India A team. Both legends highlighted the lack of tactical acumen and the failure to seize key moments, hallmarks of Australia’s cricketing ethos in the past.

India’s Triumph Amid Adversity

India’s victory at the Gabba was not merely a cricketing achievement but a testament to resilience and character. Despite losing key players to injuries and enduring setbacks, the young Indian side, led by Ajinkya Rahane, displayed grit and determination. Mohammed Siraj, Washington Sundar, Shardul Thakur, Shubman Gill, and Rishabh Pant rose to the occasion, while Cheteshwar Pujara’s stoic resistance laid the foundation for success. Their collective effort exposed Australia’s vulnerabilities and underscored the shifting balance of power in world cricket.

 Conclusion

The Gabba, once a symbol of Australian dominance, now stands as a reminder of their mortality. India’s triumph was a watershed moment, not only for Indian cricket but for the sport itself. It highlighted the enduring allure of Test cricket, where resilience and strategy triumph over power and reputation. For Australia, this defeat should serve as a wake-up call to rediscover the mental toughness and tactical sharpness that once defined their cricketing legacy.

 Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Tuesday, January 19, 2021

Triumph of Grit: India’s Historic Conquest at the Gabba

If you are fighting, let the world witness how valiantly you fight. Don’t let your efforts end in obscurity; let the bruises on your face and body symbolize your victory. When adversity drags you into quicksand, don’t wait for the earth to swallow you—crawl out, defy the darkness, and emerge triumphant. Let the world witness your grit and patience, and how challenges fuel your resolve.

Don’t lose.

 

Don’t give up.

 

Keep trying.

 

Fortune favours the brave.

The Legacy of the Gabba

Back in December 1977, Australia faced a formidable Indian unit in Brisbane. Bishan Bedi spun a web around the Australians in the first innings, but India succumbed to a relatively inexperienced Australian bowling attack. With 341 runs to chase in the fourth innings, Sunil Gavaskar led India’s spirited pursuit. Despite falling short by just 16 runs, the encounter left an indelible mark on cricketing history.

Over the years, the Gabba became a fortress for Australia. From the late 1980s, it was a venue where visiting teams, no matter how strong, crumbled under the weight of Australian dominance. For nearly three decades, this bastion remained unbreachable. Teams from England, South Africa, West Indies, New Zealand, Pakistan, and India all left Brisbane empty-handed, reinforcing its status as an impenetrable stronghold.

But on January 19, 2021, history was rewritten. The fortress fell, and the tricolour flew high at the Gabba.

A Shift in Cricket’s Power Dynamics

Cricket has evolved dramatically over the years. Gone are the days of invincible teams like Clive Lloyd’s West Indies or Steve Waugh’s Australia. The balance of power has shifted eastward. India has emerged as a cricketing powerhouse, consistently proving its mettle on foreign soil. For over 17 years, India has demonstrated how to excel in Australia, and the Border-Gavaskar Trophy has become a marquee contest, rivaling even the Ashes in prestige.

While other Test series have lost their sheen, the Border-Gavaskar Trophy has kept the flame of Test cricket alive. It is a testament to the enduring appeal of the longest format, showcasing its dramatic twists and unparalleled intensity.

From Disgrace to Glory

India’s journey in the 2020-21 series began with humiliation in Adelaide, where they were bowled out for a mere 36 runs. Critics and pundits wrote them off, but this young team, led by Ajinkya Rahane, refused to capitulate. Adversity became their ally, fueling their determination to fight back. Each setback only strengthened their resolve.

By the time they reached Brisbane, India’s squad was a patchwork of young, inexperienced players. Yet, these underdogs defied expectations, embodying the spirit of resilience. The Gabba Test became a stage for an extraordinary display of character and skill.

The Unsung Hero: Cheteshwar Pujara

While the heroics of Mohammed Siraj, Washington Sundar, Shardul Thakur, Shubman Gill, and Rishabh Pant captured headlines, the contributions of Cheteshwar Pujara were equally vital. His stoic batting laid the foundation for India’s success. Often criticized for his slow scoring, Pujara’s approach was a masterclass in patience and perseverance. His ability to blunt the Australian attack allowed others to flourish.

On Day 5, Pujara endured a barrage of short-pitched deliveries, taking blows to his helmet, thumb, and body. Despite the physical toll, he stood firm, facing 211 deliveries for his 56 runs. His defiance frustrated the Australian bowlers, who grew fatigued and erratic. Pujara’s resilience created the platform for Pant’s audacious counterattack and Gill’s elegant strokeplay.

A Day for the Ages

The final day of the Gabba Test was a microcosm of Test cricket’s enduring allure. It was a day of relentless challenges and dramatic momentum shifts. The young Indian team faced the might of Australia’s world-class bowling attack, but they refused to back down.

Shardul Thakur and Washington Sundar’s spirited lower-order contributions in the first innings had kept India in the game. On Day 5, Shubman Gill’s fluent 91 and Rishabh Pant’s fearless 89 not out stole the show. Pant’s innings was a blend of calculated aggression and audacious strokeplay, epitomizing the fearless brand of cricket this Indian team embodies.

As the final runs were scored, the Gabba fortress crumbled. India’s victory lap was not just a celebration of a Test match win but a tribute to the indomitable spirit of a team that refused to surrender.

The Broader Implications

This victory was more than a cricketing achievement; it was a statement. It reaffirmed the relevance and beauty of Test cricket in an era dominated by shorter formats. It showcased the importance of grit, character, and teamwork. It reminded the cricketing world that the longest format remains the ultimate test of skill and temperament.

For Australia, the series exposed vulnerabilities in their batting and bowling. For India, it was a moment of vindication, proving that even in the face of adversity, they could rise to the occasion.

Conclusion

India’s triumph at the Gabba was not just about breaching a fortress; it was about redefining resilience. It was a victory that celebrated the essence of Test cricket—a format where patience, skill, and character reign supreme. As the team basked in the glory of their historic win, they also reminded the world why Test cricket remains the pinnacle of the sport.

 Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Monday, January 11, 2021

GĂ©rson: The Golden Left Foot Behind Brazil's Greatest Triumph

The Brazil team that triumphed in the 1970 World Cup is often hailed as one of the most exceptional assemblages of footballing talent ever seen on the international stage. It was a squad brimming with star power, each player capable of altering the course of a match with a moment of individual brilliance. Yet, it was not just the sum of these individual talents that made the team so remarkable; it was the seamless fusion of their abilities into a collective performance that transcended personal glory. Their play was not merely a display of technical mastery, but an exuberant reassertion of *jogo bonito*, a celebration of football that invited all who cherish the beautiful game to believe in its power once again.

At the heart of this team stood PelĂ©, the undisputed icon, often regarded as the first among equals in a group of extraordinary talents. Yet, alongside him, were other figures who left indelible marks on the tournament. Rivelino, with his cannonball shots, TostĂŁo, whose elegance was matched by an almost brutal grace, and Jairzinho, whose star was on the rise, all contributed to the brilliance of the Seleção. But it was Carlos Alberto, the imperious captain, whose majestic fourth goal in the final against Italy became the defining moment of Brazil’s World Cup triumph, leading his team to glory and immortalizing their place in football history.

However, there was one player whose contribution, though often overshadowed by the more flamboyant stars, was indispensable to the team’s success. GĂ©rson de Oliveira Nunes, known simply as GĂ©rson, may not have garnered the same level of adulation as PelĂ© or Carlos Alberto, but his role was nothing short of pivotal. Often described as the brain of the team, GĂ©rson was the linchpin around which the team’s fluid attacking play revolved. His vision and composure in midfield allowed him to dictate the tempo of the game, pulling the strings that made the rest of the team dance to the irresistible rhythm of their collective brilliance. While his name may not be the first to come to mind when recalling the 1970 World Cup, GĂ©rson’s influence on the pitch was profound, his quiet genius providing the foundation for Brazil’s most celebrated victory.

The Start of a Football Journey

 Born in the winter of 1941, GĂ©rson de Oliveira Nunes—later to be immortalized by the moniker Canhotinha de Ouro (Golden Left Foot)—seemed destined by the hand of fate to become a footballer. His lineage was steeped in the sport; both his father and uncle were professional players, with his father also being a close confidant of the legendary Zizinho. This pedigree, rich in footballing heritage, would be honoured by GĂ©rson with a career that transcended the ordinary.

As a teenager, GĂ©rson’s rise to prominence was swift and inevitable. He joined Flamengo, where his innate talent was quickly apparent. His ability to transition the ball from defence to attack with a single, incisive pass, to control the tempo of the game with unhurried precision, and to orchestrate play with an almost prophetic sense of timing, set him apart. These gifts—rarely seen even at the highest level—marked him as a player of exceptional vision and intelligence. His capacity to read the game, to probe and prompt with an intuitive understanding of when and how to execute each option, suggested a maturity far beyond his years.

At this early juncture in his career, GĂ©rson’s talent drew inevitable comparisons to Didi, the linchpin of the Brazilian national team at the time. It was the highest of praises and one that placed GĂ©rson in the company of Brazil’s finest. Although he lacked the blistering speed that often defined great players, his footballing intellect embodied the adage that the first five yards of a player’s pace reside in the mind. In this, GĂ©rson was the epitome of cerebral football, his awareness and anticipation allowing him to outmanoeuvre opponents without the need for rapid acceleration.

Such mastery of the game, however, requires not only talent but the self-assurance to recognize one’s own potential and the audacity to execute it on the grandest stage. GĂ©rson possessed this self-belief in abundance. It was a characteristic that would define not only his playing days but also his post-football career. His confidence in his abilities, coupled with a refusal to accept anything less than the highest level of competition, would shape the trajectory of his professional life.

Less than a year after making his debut for Flamengo, GĂ©rson’s prodigious talents were recognized on a broader stage when he was selected for the Brazilian team that contested the 1959 Pan-American Games. The following year, he represented Brazil at the Rome Olympics, where he scored four goals, although Brazil’s campaign ended at the group stage. By this point, it was evident to both club and national team managers that GĂ©rson was not merely a promising young player, but a rare and exceptional talent in the making. His development was a story of inevitable progression, a gem polished through experience and destined for greatness.

The Flamengo Days

 Back at Flamengo’s Ilha do Urubu stadium in Rio, the club’s Paraguayan manager, Fleitas Solich, entrusted GĂ©rson with the role of the team’s primary creative force. This decision was mirrored by national coach AymorĂ© Moreira, who called up the young playmaker to the Brazilian squad that would defend their World Cup title in Chile—an honour that had been sealed by PelĂ©’s iconic performances in Sweden four years earlier. However, GĂ©rson’s dreams of contributing to Brazil’s bid for a second consecutive triumph were shattered by a knee injury. As PelĂ©, Garrincha, and the rest of the Seleção lifted the trophy once more, GĂ©rson was left on the sidelines, a cruel reminder that injury would often thwart his career at pivotal moments.

In his four years with Flamengo, GĂ©rson played over 150 league matches, scoring an impressive 80 goals—a remarkable tally for a player primarily tasked with orchestrating play from midfield. Despite this success and the adoration of the fans, GĂ©rson’s relentless desire to improve led him to leave the club in 1963, seeking new challenges that would test his talents further.

One such challenge came the previous year when Flamengo faced Botafogo in the final of the Rio Championship. It was a high-stakes match, an opportunity for the young midfielder to showcase his abilities on a grand stage. Yet, in a tactical move that would test his versatility, GĂ©rson’s manager instructed him to abandon his attacking instincts and focus instead on a man-marking job against Botafogo’s star player, the legendary Garrincha. It was a defensive assignment that contrasted sharply with GĂ©rson’s usual role as the creative heartbeat of his team.

This tactical shift was reminiscent of the approach taken by Helmut Schön during the 1970 World Cup, when he tasked Franz Beckenbauer with man-marking England’s Bobby Charlton in the quarter-finals. However, there was a key difference: Beckenbauer was a seasoned international, already in his second World Cup, and his ability to adapt to such a role was honed through years of experience. In contrast, GĂ©rson was a young player still learning the nuances of top-level football, and the task of neutralizing Garrincha—one of the most elusive and unpredictable players of all time—was a far greater challenge. Whereas Beckenbauer’s defensive duties allowed him to eventually unshackle himself and influence the game once Charlton was substituted, GĂ©rson’s inexperience made his task far more daunting. The weight of the responsibility, coupled with the complexity of facing a player of Garrincha’s calibre, underscored the vast gap between theory and execution for a young talent still in the process of defining his career.

Signing for Botafogo

 The task of man-marking Garrincha was, in fact, a challenge beyond even the world’s most accomplished defenders, a reality underscored in two World Cups. It came as no great surprise—perhaps only to Flamengo’s manager—that despite GĂ©rson’s determined adherence to his tactical assignment, the job proved insurmountable for such a young and relatively inexperienced player. Botafogo triumphed 3-0, and GĂ©rson’s influence on the match was minimal, his attempts to fulfil his defensive duties largely ineffectually.

For GĂ©rson, this failure was frustrating but hardly unexpected. It marked a turning point in his relationship with Flamengo, leading him to reject a contract renewal the following year. The decision to leave the club and join his conquerors seemed almost inevitable. The old adage, “If you can’t beat them, join them,” may well have echoed in his mind as he made the move to Botafogo. There, he would play alongside Garrincha for the next few years, though the "Little Bird" would soon leave the nest to join Corinthians, leaving GĂ©rson to continue his journey with the FogĂŁo.

For any young Brazilian footballer, a move to Botafogo was a coveted opportunity. At the time, the club boasted one of the most illustrious squads in the country. Alongside Garrincha, GĂ©rson would join a roster that included Didi—whose style had often been compared to GĂ©rson’s own—NĂ­lton Santos, and Mário Zagallo, each of whom added their own creative spark to the team’s brilliance. To play alongside such luminaries was a rare privilege, and GĂ©rson flourished in the company of these footballing giants. His move to Botafogo marked the beginning of a highly successful chapter in his career. The club won the Rio-SĂŁo Paulo Championship in both 1966 and 1967, and in 1967 and 1968, they also claimed the Rio Championship. The pinnacle of this period came in 1968, when Botafogo secured their first national title, lifting the Brazilian Cup after defeating Fortaleza in the final. In this fertile environment, GĂ©rson’s talent blossomed, and he became an integral part of a team that would go down in history as one of Brazil’s finest.

Genesis of a World Champion

The 1966 World Cup proved to be a cruel chapter in GĂ©rson’s career, a tournament that did little to enhance his reputation despite his undeniable talent. Brazil, having won two consecutive titles, travelled to England with high hopes of completing a historic hat-trick. Yet, the tournament unfolded as a nightmare. Brazil’s campaign was marred by a brutal physicality that bordered on barbaric, a treatment that could be likened to the malevolent image of breaking a butterfly upon a wheel, as Alexander Pope once wrote. While it’s true that GĂ©rson’s performances were underwhelming, one could hardly blame him given the circumstances. The tournament, a cruel and violent ordeal, left its mark on the entire team, and GĂ©rson would take four years to put matters right.

In 1969, GĂ©rson’s time with Botafogo came to an end, having achieved considerable success. Over nearly 250 league appearances, he scored close to a century of goals—an impressive tally for a player whose primary role was as a playmaker. Yet, in a squad brimming with attacking talent, his goal-scoring potential might have been even greater had he been the focal point of the attack. Seeking new challenges, GĂ©rson moved to SĂŁo Paulo in 1969, a decision that would mark the beginning of a fresh chapter in his illustrious career. However, just as he had in the past, injury once again cast a shadow over his prospects for the 1970 World Cup, threatening to derail his third attempt at the ultimate prize.

Despite these setbacks, GĂ©rson was selected for Brazil’s opening match against Czechoslovakia. However, just past the hour mark, with Brazil leading 3-1, GĂ©rson was forced to leave the field due to injury, missing the final two group-stage matches against England and Romania. Brazil managed to secure victories in both, including a tense 1-0 win over England, but the absence of their cerebral midfielder was felt. When GĂ©rson returned for the quarter-final against Peru, Brazil’s fortunes seemed to shift. With him back in the fold, the Seleção regained their rhythm, dispatching Peru 4-2 before cruising to a 3-1 victory over Uruguay in the semi-finals.

The final against Italy, however, would test Brazil’s mettle in ways they hadn’t anticipated. After PelĂ©’s early header put Brazil ahead, it seemed as though the match would follow the expected script, with the Azzurri fading under the weight of their exhaustion after a gruelling 4-3 semi-final victory over West Germany. But when Roberto Boninsegna capitalized on a defensive lapse to equalize, Brazil’s confidence faltered. The equalizer punctured their momentum, and Italy, reinvigorated by the unexpected turn of events, gained belief.

It is often said that the best team in a tournament does not always win the World Cup—just ask the Hungarian team of 1954, who were defeated by West Germany in the final despite having trounced them 8-3 in the group stages. Brazil needed a catalyst to reignite their game, a player capable of lifting the team’s spirits and reasserting control. GĂ©rson, the orchestrator of Brazil’s midfield, was that player. As the match wore on, Brazil regained their composure and dominance, and it was GĂ©rson who, just past the hour mark, struck the decisive blow. His goal restored Brazil’s lead and propelled them towards their third World Cup triumph. While much of the attention was rightly focused on PelĂ© and Carlos Alberto, it was GĂ©rson who had steered the ship through turbulent waters, and his emotional reaction at the final whistle, as he was swept up in the euphoria of Brazil’s greatest achievement, was a poignant reminder of his central role in their victory.

After 75 league appearances for SĂŁo Paulo, GĂ©rson made his final move, returning to his boyhood club, Fluminense. His time there, however, was brief and less illustrious, as injuries and the toll of age began to diminish his influence on the field. Over two years, he made 57 league appearances and scored just five goals—far from the prolific numbers he had once posted. GĂ©rson’s career, which had spanned 533 league games across four clubs, came to an end in 1974, with almost 200 goals to his name. On the international stage, he earned 85 caps for Brazil, winning 61 of those matches and scoring 19 goals. But none of those goals were as significant as the one he scored in the 1970 World Cup final, a strike that restored Brazil’s lead and ultimately secured their victory. His final appearance for the Seleção came in July 1972, a fitting conclusion to his international career, as Brazil triumphed 1-0 over Portugal in what was another hard-fought victory.

A Gem in The Centre of Park

 Although GĂ©rson was primarily deployed as a holding midfielder, his role in the 1970 World Cup-winning Brazilian team transcended the conventional expectations of the position. As Jonathan Wilson astutely observed in a 2013 article for The Guardian, GĂ©rson was an early and pioneering example of a more creative interpretation of the holding midfielder role—one focused not merely on regaining possession, but on controlling the game through ball retention and precise passing. His approach to the position was a harmonious blend of tactical intelligence, technical mastery, and an almost instinctive understanding of the flow of the game.

In this capacity, GĂ©rson was the cerebral force behind Brazil’s triumph, often described as the "brain" of the team. His ability to dictate the tempo of play from midfield, to calm the game when necessary and accelerate it when the moment demanded, marked him as a player of exceptional vision and composure. His passing, renowned for its accuracy and elegance, allowed him to orchestrate play from deep positions, setting the rhythm for his teammates and ensuring that the ball was always moving with purpose. GĂ©rson’s capacity to switch from defence to attack with a single, incisive long ball—often delivered with a precision that seemed almost preordained—was one of the defining features of his game. His vision allowed him to spot runs and make passes that would launch his team forward with devastating effect, a hallmark of Brazil's fluid, attacking style.

GĂ©rson’s technical gifts were matched by his tactical acumen. He possessed an exceptional positional sense, always appearing in the right place at the right time, whether to intercept an opposing pass or to dictate the next phase of play. His deep understanding of the game allowed him to remain composed under pressure, and his decisions were invariably calculated to benefit the team as a whole. Yet, despite his role as a facilitator, he was no stranger to taking matters into his own hands when required. His powerful left foot, which could strike the ball with precision and force, earned him the nickname *Canhotinha de Ouro* (Golden Left Foot), a fitting tribute to one of the most formidable weapons in his arsenal.

Regarded as one of the finest passers in football history, GĂ©rson’s influence extended far beyond the statistics of goals and assists. His legacy lies in his ability to shape the game, to turn fleeting moments into opportunities for his team, and to play with a calmness and intelligence that belied the intensity of the competition. In a team filled with stars, GĂ©rson’s brilliance was often understated, but his importance to Brazil’s success in 1970 cannot be overstated. He was, quite simply, the engine that drove one of the greatest teams ever assembled, and his contributions to the beautiful game continue to resonate with those who understand the artistry of midfield play.

The After Years – A Bold Critic

 Even after his retirement, GĂ©rson remained a prominent figure in Brazilian football, though not always for the most positive reasons. In 1976, he found himself at the centre of controversy when he appeared in a commercial for Vila Rica cigarettes. The ad, which featured GĂ©rson declaring, “I like to take advantage of everything, right? You too take advantage!” was interpreted by many as a tacit endorsement of the morally dubious "Jeitinho Brasileiro"—the cultural tendency to circumvent laws and social norms to achieve personal gain. Whether by design or sheer misjudgment, the phrase resonated as an endorsement of corruption and bribery, a sentiment that GĂ©rson would later regret. He clarified that this was never his intention, and he expressed remorse for having participated in the commercial, acknowledging the unfortunate implications of his involvement.

Beyond the commercial, GĂ©rson’s post-retirement years were marked by a series of public spats, including a notable falling-out with PelĂ©. When PelĂ© released his list of the 125 Greatest Footballers of All Time, GĂ©rson was notably absent. This omission, particularly given his instrumental role in Brazil's 1970 World Cup victory, rankled GĂ©rson’s strong sense of self-belief. He voiced his displeasure with characteristic candour, publicly criticizing the list, which he felt failed to acknowledge the greatness of himself and several of his 1970 teammates. In a memorable protest, GĂ©rson visited a local radio station, where he dramatically tore up a piece of paper symbolizing PelĂ©’s list. “I respect his opinion, but I don’t agree,” he declared, his frustration palpable. “Apart from Zidane, Platini, and Fontaine, I’m behind 11 Frenchmen? It’s a joke to hear this.”

GĂ©rson’s outspokenness didn’t stop there. He also took aim at the new generation of Brazilian footballers, particularly Neymar. In a conversation with Fox Sports, GĂ©rson expressed doubt that Neymar, despite his exceptional talent and astronomical transfer fees, would have earned a spot in Brazil’s 1970 World Cup squad. With the likes of PelĂ©, Jairzinho, TostĂŁo, and Rivelino already established in the starting lineup, GĂ©rson was adamant that Neymar would not have displaced any of them. “There wouldn’t be a space for Neymar,” he asserted, dismissing the possibility of the modern superstar fitting into the team, even as a substitute. He pointed to Caju, a player of immense talent who had struggled to secure a starting role in that illustrious squad, as an example of the competition Neymar would have faced. “I don’t even know if Neymar would have a place on the bench in that team,” GĂ©rson remarked, reinforcing his belief that the current generation of players, despite their fame and success, did not measure up to the legendary figures of Brazil’s golden era.

In his later years, GĂ©rson transitioned into a new role as a football commentator for Rio’s radio stations, lending his distinctive voice and insight to the games he once played. While he may no longer be on the pitch, his passion for the game remains evident as he provides a bridge between the action on the field and the fans who listen intently to his every word. Despite the emergence of players like Neymar, who commands global attention, there remains a deep nostalgia among many Brazilian football fans for the days when Canhotinha de Ouro donned the Canarinho shirt. In their eyes, GĂ©rson’s golden left foot and cerebral approach to the game represent a standard of excellence that the modern generation may never quite reach.

Conclusion

 GĂ©rson de Oliveira Nunes was undeniably a player of rare and exceptional talent, a once-in-a-generation figure whose career was marked by both extraordinary fortune and poignant misfortune. To have played alongside the constellation of stars at Botafogo, with the likes of Garrincha, Didi, and Nilton Santos, must have been a source of immense pride and joy. Yet, it was his role in Brazil’s national team, which triumphed in three World Cups over four tournaments, that truly elevated his legacy. Few footballers can claim to have been part of such a golden era, and for GĂ©rson, the opportunity to display his remarkable talents on the world stage was the fulfilment of any footballer's dream.

However, the brilliance of GĂ©rson’s career is tempered by a lingering question: in any other generation, would his extraordinary midfield talents have received the recognition they deserved? In an era where the dazzling brilliance of PelĂ© often cast a shadow over his contemporaries, one wonders whether GĂ©rson’s contributions—so central to the success of Brazil’s 1970 World Cup-winning team—might have been more widely acknowledged. Would his cerebral style of play, marked by his precise passing, exceptional vision, and ability to dictate the tempo of the game, have garnered greater acclaim had he not been overshadowed by the presence of PelĂ© and other luminaries?

It is a question that remains speculative, but one that speaks to the complexities of footballing history. Perhaps, in a different context, GĂ©rson's genius might have shone even more brightly, and he might have secured a place on PelĂ©’s infamous list of the greatest footballers—a place he undoubtedly earned through his intellectual mastery of the game. Ultimately, GĂ©rson was the brain behind one of the most extraordinary teams in football history, and his contribution to Brazil’s success is a legacy that should not be diminished, even if the full recognition of his greatness remains a matter of what might have been.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Resilience Redefined: India’s Epic Fightbacks and the Revival of Test Cricket’s Soul

 

The notion that cricket is about fours and sixes, promoted by so-called experts funded by T20 league owners, is a travesty of the sport's essence. Cricket thrives in its longer formats, where the battle of wits between bowler and batsman unfolds over time. It is here that the nuances of the game emerge: a bowler pondering strategies, a captain orchestrating fields, and a batsman valuing his wicket like a treasure. Can the soul of cricket be encapsulated in a 20-over shootout? Never.

Cricket’s legacy lies in its ability to test character and skill. The bat is not merely a weapon for brute force but a shield to defend, a tool to craft an innings, and a symbol of resilience.

A Tale of Contrasts: Pakistan at Bay Oval and India at Sydney

On December 3, 2020, Pakistan and New Zealand engaged in a gripping Test at Bay Oval. Pakistan, known for their unpredictability, gave a glimmer of hope with Fawad Alam and Mohammad Rizwan’s inspiring partnership. At a juncture where prudence dictated playing for a draw, Pakistan’s adventurous streak led to a loss. A draw would have bolstered their fragile confidence, but they chose the path of recklessness.

A few weeks later, India found themselves in a similar predicament against Australia. But unlike Pakistan, India demonstrated grit and determination, scripting one of the greatest comebacks in Test history.

The Challenge at Sydney: A Mountain to Climb

On the fourth day at the Sydney Cricket Ground, India faced an improbable target of 407 runs in the fourth innings, with over 130 overs to survive. The team was plagued by injuries, missing their captain, and morale seemed low. When Shubman Gill and Rohit Sharma provided a steady start, hope flickered. However, Australia struck late, ending the day with smiles, confident of victory.

Enter Cheteshwar Pujara, the epitome of stoic resistance. As dawn broke on Day 5, many Indian fans braved the early winter morning to witness what seemed an inevitable defeat. Yet, they clung to the faint hope that Pujara might orchestrate a miracle.

The Pant-Pujara Symphony

Australia struck early, dismissing Ajinkya Rahane with a delivery that betrayed extra drift, caught expertly at short-leg. A collapse loomed, but Rishabh Pant—injured yet undeterred—strode to the crease. As Ravichandran Ashwin later revealed, Pant’s elbow injury was severe, but his resolve was unyielding.

Pant began cautiously, scoring 5 off 33 balls, enduring body blows and testing deliveries. But once settled, he unleashed his audacious stroke play, targeting Nathan Lyon with calculated aggression. Dancing down the track, he sent Lyon’s deliveries soaring over the ropes. The momentum shifted, and Australia’s confidence began to waver.

Pant’s innings was a masterclass in controlled aggression. While Pujara held one end with unshakable resolve, Pant’s flamboyance kept the scoreboard ticking. His 97-run knock was a blend of courage and artistry, a counterpunch that rattled Australia.

The Ashwin-Vihari Epic

With Pant and Pujara dismissed, the onus fell on Hanuma Vihari and Ravichandran Ashwin. Vihari, nursing a hamstring injury, and Ashwin battling back pain, faced an uphill task. Australia threw everything at them: reverse swing, relentless short balls, and close-in fielders. Yet, the duo held firm.

Ashwin bore the brunt of Australia’s hostility, taking blows to his body but refusing to yield. Vihari, despite his restricted movement, displayed impeccable technique and focus. Together, they batted for over three and a half hours, facing 258 deliveries to secure an improbable draw.

A Testament to Resilience

This was no ordinary draw. It was a statement of character, a testament to the indomitable spirit of a team that had been written off after their humiliation in Adelaide. India’s effort at Sydney was a celebration of Test cricket’s enduring appeal—a format that demands skill, patience, and mental fortitude.

Lessons for the Modern Game

India’s performances at Melbourne and Sydney have reignited the essence of Test cricket. These matches showcased the beauty of the longer format, where patience triumphs over haste, and character outshines flair. Teams and fans enamoured by the instant gratification of T20 must recognize that Test cricket is the ultimate proving ground. It is here that legends are forged and the true spirit of the game is celebrated.

 Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Friday, January 1, 2021

Roberto Rivellino: The Poet of the Pitch

 

In the annals of football history, few names evoke the same reverence as Roberto Rivellino. A maestro of the game, his artistry transcended mere sport, elevating football to a form of cultural expression. Known for his iconic moustache, thunderous left foot, and the invention of the mesmerizing “flip-flap” move, Rivelino’s legacy is not confined to his era; it resonates across generations, a beacon of creativity and innovation.

This is not merely the story of a footballer; it is the tale of an artist whose canvas was the pitch and whose brush was his unparalleled skill.

The Genesis of Greatness: Rivellino’s Early Years

Roberto Rivellino’s journey began in Sao Paulo, Brazil, a city whose heartbeat is football. Born into a modest family with an innate love for the game, Rivellino’s path seemed preordained. The cobbled streets of his neighbourhood served as his first training ground, where his natural talent was evident from the earliest kick of a ball.

By his teenage years, Rivellino’s skills had already outshone those of his peers. Corinthians, one of SĂŁo Paulo’s most prestigious clubs, recognized his potential and welcomed him into their fold. It was here, amidst the fervent energy of Brazilian football, that Rivelino began to sculpt his craft. His debut in 1965 marked the arrival of a player whose audacity and flair would soon captivate audiences worldwide.

Even in his formative years, Rivellino’s game was characterized by a rare blend of technical brilliance and an almost theatrical flair. The “flip flap,” a move that would later become his signature, was born out of his intuitive understanding of balance, deception, and timing. It was not merely a trick but a weapon—a moment of genius that left defenders floundering and spectators in awe.

The Artist at Work: Rivelilno’s Playing Style

Rivellino’s playing style was a symphony of precision and improvisation. His left foot, a tool of both power and finesse, could conjure moments of magic that defied logic. Whether it was a curling free-kick that seemed to bend the laws of physics or a thunderous strike from a distance, Rivelino’s mastery of the ball was unparalleled.

The “flip flap,” also known as the “elastico,” epitomized his inventiveness. In a single fluid motion, he would flick the ball with the outside of his foot before snapping it back with the inside, leaving defenders grasping at shadows. It was a move that combined elegance with efficiency, a perfect metaphor for Rivelino’s approach to the game.

But his genius extended beyond individual brilliance. Rivellino was a conductor on the pitch, orchestrating play with a vision and intelligence that few could match. His passes were not merely functional; they were poetic, threading through defences with a precision that seemed almost preordained. He was a player who understood the rhythm of the game, dictating its tempo with an effortless grace.

The Pinnacle of Glory: Rivelino on the World Stage

Rivelino’s international career with Brazil elevated him to the pantheon of football’s immortals. The 1970 World Cup in Mexico, often heralded as the greatest in history, was the stage upon which Rivelino truly shone.

Playing alongside legends like PelĂ©, Jairzinho, and TostĂŁo, Rivelino was an integral part of a team that redefined the art of attacking football. His free-kicks, struck with unerring accuracy, became a symbol of Brazil’s dominance. In the final against Italy, Rivellino’s contributions were pivotal as Brazil secured their third World Cup title, cementing their status as the kings of football.

The tournaments that followed in 1974 and 1978 showcased Rivellino’s resilience and adaptability. While Brazil’s performances did not reach the heights of 1970, Rivelino remained a beacon of class and consistency. Even in the twilight of his career, his performances exuded a timeless quality, a reminder of his enduring brilliance.

The Club Journeys: Corinthians and Fluminense

Rivelino’s club career was a tale of two chapters, each marked by contrasting fortunes. At Corinthians, he was the heart and soul of the team, his flair and creativity lighting up the SĂŁo Paulo football scene. Yet, despite his heroics, the elusive championship title remained out of reach, a blemish on an otherwise stellar tenure.

In 1974, Rivelino moved to Fluminense, a decision that reinvigorated his career. In Rio de Janeiro, he found a stage that matched his grandeur. Fluminense’s passionate fanbase embraced him as a saviour, and Rivellino repaid their faith with performances that were nothing short of extraordinary. His time at Fluminense may not have been laden with trophies, but it was rich in moments of magic that solidified his place in the hearts of football lovers.

A Legacy Beyond the Pitch

Rivelino’s influence on football transcends his playing days. The techniques he pioneered, particularly the “flip flap,” have become a rite of passage for aspiring footballers. Players like Ronaldinho and Cristiano Ronaldo have carried forward his legacy, adapting his moves to the demands of modern football.

His mastery of the free-kick, characterized by its precision and swerve, remains a benchmark for set-piece specialists. The “banana kick,” as it came to be known, is a testament to Rivellino’s ability to blend science with artistry, turning a simple strike of the ball into a spectacle.

But perhaps Rivellino’s greatest legacy lies in the spirit he brought to the game. He played with joy and creativity that reminded the world of football’s essence as a beautiful game. His influence is evident not just in the techniques he popularized but in the philosophy of play that values imagination and expression over mere functionality.

Conclusion: The Eternal Maestro

Roberto Rivellino was more than a footballer; he was a poet, a magician, and a pioneer. His contributions to the sport are not measured merely in goals or trophies but in the inspiration he provided to generations of players and fans.

In a world that often prioritizes results over artistry, Rivellino remains a symbol of football’s soul—a reminder that the game is at its best when played with passion, creativity, and an unrelenting love for the art. His legacy endures, not just in the records he set but in the countless moments of wonder he created, moments that continue to echo in the hearts of football lovers everywhere.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

The Dawn of a Finisher: Michael Bevan’s Masterclass on New Year’s Day, 1996

As dusk fell over the Sydney Cricket Ground on January 1, 1996, a game of cricket metamorphosed into a tale of defiance, calculation, and resilience. Australia, chasing a modest target of 173 set by the West Indies, found themselves in shambles at 38 for 6. What followed was an innings that would redefine limited-overs cricket and herald the rise of Michael Bevan, the archetype of the modern finisher.

In an era still steeped in Test-match orthodoxy, white-ball cricket was more an afterthought than a distinct craft. The players were expected to switch formats seamlessly, with little regard for the tactical nuances required in the shorter game. Yet, in this milieu of tradition, Bevan’s innings stood as a beacon of innovation and composure, laying the groundwork for a new approach to one-day internationals.

The Context: A Man on the Brink

Bevan’s journey to this defining moment was not without its tribulations. Just a year earlier, during the 1994-95 Ashes, he had been tormented by the short-pitched barrage of Darren Gough and Co., leading to his exclusion from both the Test and ODI sides. However, his exploits with Australia A in the Benson & Hedges World Series, where he scored a match-winning century against England, showcased his potential in limited-overs cricket. Recalled to the national side in December 1995, Bevan quickly demonstrated his utility with a string of measured, unbeaten innings.

But it was on this damp Sydney evening that he truly etched his name into cricketing folklore.

The Collapse

The West Indies, led by Carl Hooper’s sublime 93 not out, had posted 172 for 9, a total that seemed competitive given the conditions. Australia’s response was nothing short of catastrophic. Courtney Walsh’s direct hit removed Mark Taylor for 1. Curtly Ambrose, with his menacing bounce and precision, accounted for Michael Slater and Ricky Ponting in successive deliveries. By the time Ottis Gibson and Roger Harper joined the fray, Australia’s innings had crumbled to 38 for 6.

In those moments of despair, Bevan walked to the crease. The target seemed insurmountable, the situation dire. But where others saw chaos, Bevan saw opportunity—a puzzle to be solved with methodical precision.

The Rebuild

Bevan’s innings began with a mix of caution and grit. Surviving a dropped return catch from Harper on 14, he steadily calibrated his approach. The required run rate hovered above a run-a-ball—an intimidating prospect in an era when 300-run totals were anomalies. His partnership with Ian Healy provided a semblance of stability, but it was only after Healy’s dismissal that Bevan truly began to unfurl his mastery.

The transformation was subtle yet profound. A slap through point here, a drive through the covers there—Bevan’s strokes were not audacious but deliberate. He manipulated gaps with surgical precision, his eyes darting between the field and the scoreboard, calculating every move.

Paul Reiffel’s arrival at the crease marked a turning point. The duo added crucial runs, with Reiffel’s leg-side swishes complementing Bevan’s measured strokes. Together, they whittled down the target to 16 off 11 balls before Reiffel fell, leaving Australia’s tail exposed.

The Climax

The final moments were a study in controlled aggression and mental fortitude. With Shane Warne and Glenn McGrath for company, Bevan faced a daunting equation: six runs needed off the last four balls. A clip to long-on, a fumbled fielding effort, and a scampered single kept the chase alive.

Then came the defining moment. With four needed off the last two balls, Bevan missed his first attempt at glory—a thrash through the off-side that found a fielder. He paused, patted the pitch, and assessed the field one last time.

The final delivery was a masterstroke of improvisation. Bevan shuffled to leg, leveraged his bottom hand, and drove straight down the ground. The ball raced to the unguarded boundary, sealing a one-wicket victory that was as improbable as it was unforgettable.

The Legacy

Bevan’s unbeaten 88 off 88 balls was more than just an innings; it was a manifesto for the modern finisher. His ability to blend caution with aggression, to calculate risks with unerring precision, set a template that would be emulated by generations to come.

In an age where cricketers were expected to adapt on the fly, Bevan’s approach was revolutionary. He was not merely reacting to the game; he was orchestrating it, one calculated stroke at a time. That damp night in Sydney was not just a victory for Australia but a turning point for limited-overs cricket—a glimpse into the future of a format still finding its identity.

Michael Bevan had arrived, and the world of cricket would never be the same again.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar