The Tale of the Tenth Wicket: A Historical Reflection on Australia's Last-Stand Heroics

The first Test between India and Australia at Pune in 2017 etched yet another dramatic chapter in cricket's long history of last-wicket partnerships. For all the drama that ensued—India’s sensational batting collapse against a nascent spinner, Steve O’Keefe’s masterclass, and Australia’s eventual dominance—it was the gritty resistance from the last-wicket pair of Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood that injected steel into the Australian innings. Their invaluable 55-run partnership not only lifted Australia’s total but also set the tone for a day of cricket that left fans and pundits awestruck. 

Australia’s cricketing legacy boasts many such instances where their tail-end batsmen turned a potential disaster into triumph. The exploits of these unsung heroes often go unnoticed amid headline-grabbing centuries and five-wicket hauls. Yet, their contributions, whether through stubborn resistance or audacious counterattacks, have changed the course of matches and, at times, entire series. 

Let us revisit some iconic last-wicket partnerships from Australia’s storied past and reflect on their enduring significance. 

1. Glenn McGrath and Jason Gillespie: Agony for New Zealand (2004)

In the 2004 Brisbane Test, New Zealand faced the daunting task of squaring off against Australia at their fortress. After Jacob Oram’s scintillating century helped the Kiwis post 353, Australia responded with a blend of brilliance and calamity. Despite a stunning 216-run partnership between Michael Clarke and Adam Gilchrist, Australia found themselves precariously placed at 501 for 9. 

Enter Glenn McGrath and Jason Gillespie, two bowlers whose batting abilities were, at best, a source of amusement. Yet, against all odds, they stitched together an 84-run partnership that not only frustrated the Kiwis but also demoralized their bowlers. McGrath’s uncharacteristic 61 and Gillespie’s stoic 54 not out helped Australia amass 585. 

When New Zealand returned to bat, the psychological blow dealt by the tail-enders proved decisive. Bundled out for a paltry 76 in their second innings, the Kiwis capitulated, leaving Australia with an emphatic win. 

2. Adam Voges and Josh Hazlewood: Heartbreak for the West Indies (2015)

The first Test of the 2015 Frank Worrell series at Dominica highlighted another quintessential Australian last-wicket defiance. With the West Indies rattling the Australian middle order and reducing them to 221 for 9, the hosts had every reason to believe they could restrict the lead to manageable levels. 

However, Adam Voges, playing with the composure of a veteran, and Josh Hazlewood, determined to hold his ground, forged a 97-run partnership. Their efforts swelled Australia’s lead to 170—a margin that deflated the Caribbean spirit. The West Indies’ eventual nine-wicket defeat underscored the significance of that pivotal tenth-wicket stand. 

3. Michael Hussey and Glenn McGrath: Boxing Day Brilliance (2005)

Amidst the festive fervor of the 2005 Boxing Day Test, South Africa entered the Melbourne Cricket Ground riding high on confidence. With Australia reeling at 248 for 9, the Proteas sensed an opportunity to dominate. 

Yet, Glenn McGrath, often derided for his batting frailties, partnered with the ever-reliable Michael Hussey to script a remarkable rearguard action. Over 120 minutes, they added 107 crucial runs, elevating Australia’s total to 355. The psychological impact of this resistance echoed throughout the game, as South Africa eventually fell short, succumbing to a 184-run defeat. 

4. Albert Trott’s Adelaide Epic (1895)*

In an era of timeless Tests, Albert Trott’s heroics in the third Test against England at Adelaide in 1895 stand as one of the earliest examples of tail-end resilience. Australia, struggling at 157 for 9, were rescued by Trott and Sydney Callaway, who added a game-changing 81 runs for the final wicket. 

Trott’s brilliance extended beyond his batting; his second-innings exploits with both bat and ball ensured Australia not only avoided defeat but secured a commanding victory. His all-round performance remains a testament to how lower-order contributions can transform matches. 

5. Tom Garrett and Edwin Evans: An Ashes Classic (1885) 

In the timeless Test of 1885 at Sydney, Australia found themselves at 101 for 9 against England. The situation seemed dire until Tom Garrett and Edwin Evans joined forces. Both averaging less than 13 with the bat, they defied expectations by adding 80 critical runs. 

This partnership proved to be the turning point of the match. Armed with a slender lead, Frederick Spofforth unleashed a bowling masterclass in the second innings, and Australia eked out a nail-biting six-run victory. Garrett and Evans’ dogged resistance played a decisive role in this legendary Ashes encounter. 

Analysis: The Underrated Art of the Last Wicket

The contributions of last-wicket partnerships extend beyond mere runs on the board. They sap the opposition of energy, alter the rhythm of the game, and bolster the confidence of the batting side. These partnerships are a reminder of cricket’s unpredictability—a game where even the least likely players can rise to the occasion. 

For Australia, the resilience of their tail-enders has often been the difference between defeat and triumph. Whether through calculated defence or daring counterattacks, these moments capture the essence of Test cricket: perseverance, strategy, and the unyielding will to fight until the very end. 

Conclusion: Lessons for the Cricketing World

Australia’s history of impactful last-wicket stands underscores the importance of never underestimating the tail. For aspiring teams, these stories are lessons in grit and mental fortitude. They remind us that in cricket, as in life, the battle isn’t over until the last ball is bowled.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Swing's Symphony: Australia’s Persistent Struggles Against the Moving Ball

In the annals of cricketing history, few teams have commanded respect like Australia. Their relentless aggression, fearless mindset, and technical mastery once made them the benchmark in Test cricket. Yet, a recurring Achilles' heel has emerged in recent years—an inability to withstand the guile of swing and seam under challenging conditions. 

From Sydney to Leeds, Melbourne to Trent Bridge, and now Hobart, the script remains eerily familiar. Overcast skies, a tinge of green on the pitch, and a swinging ball have consistently exposed the frailties of the Australian batting lineup. Despite repeated lessons written in the ink of collapses, the Australian top order seems unwilling or unable to learn. 

A Chilly Morning in Hobart 

November 2016. The second Test against South Africa. The air in Hobart was crisp, the sky overcast, and the pitch bore a greenish hue—a siren call for swing bowlers. South Africa’s captain, Faf du Plessis, wasted no time inserting Australia into bat, trusting Vernon Philander and Kyle Abbott to exploit the conditions. 

What followed was a masterclass in seam and swing bowling. 

David Warner, known for his flamboyance, lasted just five deliveries. Attempting an audacious cut to a ball pitched almost on the return crease, Warner edged behind. On such a testing wicket, patience and restraint were paramount—qualities that seemed in short supply in the Australian dressing room. 

Philander and Abbott then dismantled the rest of the lineup with surgical precision. Joe Burns was trapped plumb by an in-swinger. Usman Khawaja and Adam Voges were squared up by late movement. Peter Nevill fell victim to Kagiso Rabada, while sharp catching from JP Duminy and Quinton de Kock, coupled with a run-out, completed the rout. 

Australia’s innings ended at a meagre 85, their lowest Test total at home in over three decades. 

A History of Wounds 

This was not an isolated calamity. The ghosts of Leeds 2010, where Mohammad Amir and Mohammad Asif routed Australia for 88, still linger. Memories of Melbourne 2010, where England’s pacers Anderson, Tremlett, and Bresnan skittled them for 98, remain fresh. And who could forget Stuart Broad’s devastating 8 for 15 at Trent Bridge in 2015, reducing Australia to a mere 60? 

These collapses, occurring under similar conditions, suggest a pattern. A lethal cocktail of green pitches, swinging deliveries, and cloudy skies repeatedly unravels the Australians. 

A Tale of Two Eras 

The current struggles starkly contrast the resilience of past Australian teams. Under Allan Border, and later captains like Mark Taylor and Steve Waugh, Australia developed not only courage but also a sound technique to counter fast and swing bowling. Legends like David Boon, Steve Waugh, and Matthew Hayden thrived against the likes of Wasim Akram, Curtly Ambrose, and Allan Donald, facing daunting conditions with a blend of composure, adaptability, and grit. 

Today, however, the batting lineup—featuring the likes of Joe Burns, Adam Voges, David Warner, Shaun Marsh, and Usman Khawaja—appears ill-equipped to weather similar storms. Their technique, temperament, and decision-making falter when the ball moves off the seam or swings in the air. 

Technical and Temperamental Deficiencies 

Against Philander and Abbott, the Australians erred repeatedly. Instead of covering the swing with soft hands and a horizontal bat, they played away from their bodies. Instead of getting to the pitch of the ball to negate lateral movement, they hung back, leaving edges exposed. Hard hands, poor footwork, and a lack of adaptability compounded their woes. 

Only Steve Smith showed glimpses of resilience, but as his partners fell in quick succession, his frustration mounted. Alone, he could do little to prevent the inevitable collapse. 

The Road Ahead 

Australia’s recurring failures against swing bowling reflect deeper systemic issues. The current generation of batsmen thrives on flat pitches where runs come easy. But when faced with challenging conditions, they often lack the technical soundness and mental fortitude required for Test cricket. 

The Australian think tank must address this glaring deficiency. Selection criteria need to prioritize technique and temperament over flamboyance. Domestic cricket should better simulate the challenging conditions encountered abroad, fostering a new generation capable of withstanding the moving ball. 

Conclusion 

The collapse at Hobart is not just a defeat; it is a wake-up call. For Australia to regain their dominance in Test cricket, they must confront this persistent flaw head-on. Until they do, the specter of green pitches and swinging deliveries will continue to haunt them, eroding the legacy of one of cricket’s proudest nations.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar