Tuesday, January 26, 2021

Root Reigns Supreme: A Masterclass in Galle

 

The United Kingdom, a nation buffeted by the relentless waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, has found solace in its twin obsessions: football and cricket. While the Premier League dazzles with its weekly drama, cricket, the sport of English summers, provides a more meditative escape. And in early 2021, as the spectre of a new virus strain loomed, Joe Root offered the beleaguered British cricket faithful a masterclass of resilience and artistry on the spinning tracks of Sri Lanka.

The Pandemic Backdrop and England’s Cricketing Mission

For England, the series against Sri Lanka was more than a contest; it was a crucial prelude to their much-anticipated tour of India, a place that has become a litmus test for cricketing excellence. Sri Lanka, weakened and inconsistent, seemed more an obstacle than a true adversary, but the subcontinental pitches were no less treacherous. Enter Joe Root, England’s talismanic captain, whose recent form had sparked doubts among critics.

Since taking over as skipper, Root's batting average had faltered, inviting comparisons with his peers—Virat Kohli, Kane Williamson, and Steve Smith—all of whom seemed to thrive under the burden of leadership. Galle, however, witnessed the re-emergence of a cricketer who once seemed destined for greatness, and by the end of the two-Test series, Root had not just silenced his doubters; he had redefined the art of batting against spin.

The Galle Gambit: Root’s Tactical Brilliance

The first Test at Galle began with Sri Lanka folding for a modest total. England's reply faltered early, but Root's entrance at the crease signalled a transformation. With a calmness that belied the pressure, he navigated the turn and bounce of a surface that confounded most others. The sweep shot became his signature weapon, a stroke executed with such precision and frequency that it evoked memories of Graham Gooch’s epic knock in Mumbai, in 1987.

Root’s double century in the first Test was a testament to his tactical adaptability and technical refinement. His trigger movement, a subtle shift back and across, prevented him from being squared up by sharp turners. By opening his stance slightly, he enhanced his ability to counter deliveries pitching on or outside off-stump, allowing his bat to come down straighter and more decisively.

Sri Lanka’s spinners, led by the industrious Lasith Embuldeniya, probed with discipline. Yet Root’s response—built on rotation of strike, occasional boundaries, and unerring judgment—was a masterclass in nullifying pressure. The statistics told part of the story: Root faced 291 balls for his 228, scoring 54% of England’s first-innings runs. But the visual narrative was more compelling. Every sweep, every deft placement, underscored his supreme confidence and control.

Sustained Brilliance: The Second Test

Root’s hunger for runs was undiminished in the second Test, where he again carried England’s batting on his shoulders. On a pitch that turned even more viciously, his application and temperament shone through. Despite the energy-sapping heat and humidity, he amassed another century and was only denied a second double-ton of the series by an unfortunate run-out. His aggregate of 426 runs across the two matches accounted for an astonishing 44.4% of England’s total runs—an achievement that placed him among the greats of the game.

A Captain’s Evolution

Root’s resurgence as a batsman coincided with a noticeable maturity in his captaincy. In his own words, the enforced break during the pandemic had given him time to reflect and refine. His understanding of spin—both as a batsman and a tactician—was evident in his field placements, bowling changes, and the way he orchestrated England’s dominance.

Technically, Root’s batting adjustments were subtle but significant. His compact back-lift and quicker pick-up allowed him to stay balanced and respond to sharp turn with precision. The front shoulder engaged more effectively, and his footwork—both forward and back—was decisive. These changes ensured that Root not only survived but thrived in conditions that exposed lesser techniques.

A Glimpse of What’s to Come

The series against Sri Lanka was a prologue to the sterner test awaiting England in India. Root’s performances suggested that he had rediscovered his form and his love for the challenge. The statistics—his double-centuries, strike rotation, record-breaking sweep shots—offered a quantitative measure of his brilliance. Yet, it was the qualitative aspects—the composure under pressure, the artistry against spin, the ability to inspire his team—that truly marked his return to the pantheon of cricketing greats.

For England, the hope is that this rejuvenated Root can lead them to new heights in India and beyond. For cricket lovers, his performances in Galle were a reminder of the beauty and complexity of Test cricket—a format where class, patience, and strategy converge to create something timeless.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar  

Saturday, January 23, 2021

The Fall of the Gabbatoir: A Literary and Analytical Perspective

 

In 1987, an unfancied Australian cricket team led by Allan Border and guided by coach Bob Simpson defied all odds to lift the Reliance World Cup. Against the backdrop of a packed Eden Gardens, the Australians arrived as no-hopers but left as champions, overcoming heavyweights like India, Pakistan, and England. Yet, despite this triumph, that Australian unit was still a work in progress. Subsequent defeats to Pakistan and the West Indies, both away and at home, reflected their vulnerability, with losses at Brisbane and Melbourne considered routine during that era.

The transformation of Australian cricket began in the mid-1990s. Brisbane, once a site of occasional Australian defeats, became a fortress, while the Boxing Day Tests at Melbourne evolved into a symbol of Australian dominance. The aura of invincibility passed from the West Indies in 1995, defined Australian cricket for nearly two decades. Yet, as the years progressed, even this dominance began to exhibit cracks. By the time India’s young, injury-ridden team breached Brisbane’s fortress in January 2021, Australia’s long-held supremacy at these iconic venues had been reduced to mere memory.

The Decline of Australian Mentality

The last time Australia stumbled through a home Test without a single batsman scoring fifty was against the mighty West Indies at the MCG in 1988. Similarly, their last defeat at Brisbane, in the same year, was also against the West Indies. Those losses were acceptable; they came against a team that epitomized dominance. But losing to an Indian side decimated by injuries, relying heavily on its bench strength, raises serious questions about Australia’s temperament—a team once synonymous with mental toughness, ruthlessness, and professionalism.

India’s ignominious collapse at Adelaide, where Australian pacers breathed fire, could have set the tone for a dominant series. Yet, after that eventful session, Australia’s bowling unit inexplicably lost its aggression and precision. Among the four frontline bowlers, consistency was elusive; when one bowler stepped up, the others let the pressure dissipate. The famed Spartan line and length, the hallmark of Australian fast bowling, appeared only sporadically.

More glaring was the failure of the Australian batting unit. Steve Smith, the lynchpin of their lineup, was uncharacteristically out of form. Marnus Labuschagne squandered starts, David Warner played recklessly, and the rest of the batting order faltered against an inexperienced Indian attack. There was a palpable lack of intent, patience, and grit—qualities once emblematic of Australian cricket. The batsmen’s execution of shots lacked confidence, and their shoulders slumped under pressure, a far cry from the defiance shown during Border and Simpson’s rebuilding era.

Leadership Under Scrutiny

Tim Paine’s captaincy was emblematic of Australia’s struggles. Where Allan Border galvanized his team with proactive leadership, Paine appeared reactive and indecisive. His inability to maintain composure under pressure—evident in his verbal spats and tactical missteps—highlighted the erosion of Australia’s mental intimidation. Rather than unsettling the Indians, Paine’s approach seemed to embolden them.

The decision to target the body rather than attack the stumps, especially the top of off, was a tactical blunder. This approach, uncharacteristic of Australian greats like Glenn McGrath and Jason Gillespie, allowed Indian batsmen to settle and frustrate the bowlers. Greg Chappell aptly noted in the Sydney Morning Herald that the Gabba pitch, traditionally known for its bounce and pace, resembled a T20 track rather than the “Gabbatoir” of old. This misreading of conditions compounded Australia’s woes.

A Series of Missed Opportunities

Shane Warne’s critique encapsulated Australia’s failures. “Australia had so many chances in this series to bury it and crush India, but they couldn’t do it,” he remarked. Ricky Ponting echoed this sentiment, expressing shock at Australia’s inability to defeat what was essentially an India A team. Both legends highlighted the lack of tactical acumen and the failure to seize key moments, hallmarks of Australia’s cricketing ethos in the past.

India’s Triumph Amid Adversity

India’s victory at the Gabba was not merely a cricketing achievement but a testament to resilience and character. Despite losing key players to injuries and enduring setbacks, the young Indian side, led by Ajinkya Rahane, displayed grit and determination. Mohammed Siraj, Washington Sundar, Shardul Thakur, Shubman Gill, and Rishabh Pant rose to the occasion, while Cheteshwar Pujara’s stoic resistance laid the foundation for success. Their collective effort exposed Australia’s vulnerabilities and underscored the shifting balance of power in world cricket.

 Conclusion

The Gabba, once a symbol of Australian dominance, now stands as a reminder of their mortality. India’s triumph was a watershed moment, not only for Indian cricket but for the sport itself. It highlighted the enduring allure of Test cricket, where resilience and strategy triumph over power and reputation. For Australia, this defeat should serve as a wake-up call to rediscover the mental toughness and tactical sharpness that once defined their cricketing legacy.

 Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Tuesday, January 19, 2021

Triumph of Grit: India’s Historic Conquest at the Gabba

If you are fighting, let the world witness how valiantly you fight. Don’t let your efforts end in obscurity; let the bruises on your face and body symbolize your victory. When adversity drags you into quicksand, don’t wait for the earth to swallow you—crawl out, defy the darkness, and emerge triumphant. Let the world witness your grit and patience, and how challenges fuel your resolve.

Don’t lose.

 

Don’t give up.

 

Keep trying.

 

Fortune favours the brave.

The Legacy of the Gabba

Back in December 1977, Australia faced a formidable Indian unit in Brisbane. Bishan Bedi spun a web around the Australians in the first innings, but India succumbed to a relatively inexperienced Australian bowling attack. With 341 runs to chase in the fourth innings, Sunil Gavaskar led India’s spirited pursuit. Despite falling short by just 16 runs, the encounter left an indelible mark on cricketing history.

Over the years, the Gabba became a fortress for Australia. From the late 1980s, it was a venue where visiting teams, no matter how strong, crumbled under the weight of Australian dominance. For nearly three decades, this bastion remained unbreachable. Teams from England, South Africa, West Indies, New Zealand, Pakistan, and India all left Brisbane empty-handed, reinforcing its status as an impenetrable stronghold.

But on January 19, 2021, history was rewritten. The fortress fell, and the tricolour flew high at the Gabba.

A Shift in Cricket’s Power Dynamics

Cricket has evolved dramatically over the years. Gone are the days of invincible teams like Clive Lloyd’s West Indies or Steve Waugh’s Australia. The balance of power has shifted eastward. India has emerged as a cricketing powerhouse, consistently proving its mettle on foreign soil. For over 17 years, India has demonstrated how to excel in Australia, and the Border-Gavaskar Trophy has become a marquee contest, rivaling even the Ashes in prestige.

While other Test series have lost their sheen, the Border-Gavaskar Trophy has kept the flame of Test cricket alive. It is a testament to the enduring appeal of the longest format, showcasing its dramatic twists and unparalleled intensity.

From Disgrace to Glory

India’s journey in the 2020-21 series began with humiliation in Adelaide, where they were bowled out for a mere 36 runs. Critics and pundits wrote them off, but this young team, led by Ajinkya Rahane, refused to capitulate. Adversity became their ally, fueling their determination to fight back. Each setback only strengthened their resolve.

By the time they reached Brisbane, India’s squad was a patchwork of young, inexperienced players. Yet, these underdogs defied expectations, embodying the spirit of resilience. The Gabba Test became a stage for an extraordinary display of character and skill.

The Unsung Hero: Cheteshwar Pujara

While the heroics of Mohammed Siraj, Washington Sundar, Shardul Thakur, Shubman Gill, and Rishabh Pant captured headlines, the contributions of Cheteshwar Pujara were equally vital. His stoic batting laid the foundation for India’s success. Often criticized for his slow scoring, Pujara’s approach was a masterclass in patience and perseverance. His ability to blunt the Australian attack allowed others to flourish.

On Day 5, Pujara endured a barrage of short-pitched deliveries, taking blows to his helmet, thumb, and body. Despite the physical toll, he stood firm, facing 211 deliveries for his 56 runs. His defiance frustrated the Australian bowlers, who grew fatigued and erratic. Pujara’s resilience created the platform for Pant’s audacious counterattack and Gill’s elegant strokeplay.

A Day for the Ages

The final day of the Gabba Test was a microcosm of Test cricket’s enduring allure. It was a day of relentless challenges and dramatic momentum shifts. The young Indian team faced the might of Australia’s world-class bowling attack, but they refused to back down.

Shardul Thakur and Washington Sundar’s spirited lower-order contributions in the first innings had kept India in the game. On Day 5, Shubman Gill’s fluent 91 and Rishabh Pant’s fearless 89 not out stole the show. Pant’s innings was a blend of calculated aggression and audacious strokeplay, epitomizing the fearless brand of cricket this Indian team embodies.

As the final runs were scored, the Gabba fortress crumbled. India’s victory lap was not just a celebration of a Test match win but a tribute to the indomitable spirit of a team that refused to surrender.

The Broader Implications

This victory was more than a cricketing achievement; it was a statement. It reaffirmed the relevance and beauty of Test cricket in an era dominated by shorter formats. It showcased the importance of grit, character, and teamwork. It reminded the cricketing world that the longest format remains the ultimate test of skill and temperament.

For Australia, the series exposed vulnerabilities in their batting and bowling. For India, it was a moment of vindication, proving that even in the face of adversity, they could rise to the occasion.

Conclusion

India’s triumph at the Gabba was not just about breaching a fortress; it was about redefining resilience. It was a victory that celebrated the essence of Test cricket—a format where patience, skill, and character reign supreme. As the team basked in the glory of their historic win, they also reminded the world why Test cricket remains the pinnacle of the sport.

 Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Monday, January 11, 2021

Gérson: The Golden Left Foot Behind Brazil's Greatest Triumph

The Brazil team that triumphed in the 1970 World Cup is often hailed as one of the most exceptional assemblages of footballing talent ever seen on the international stage. It was a squad brimming with star power, each player capable of altering the course of a match with a moment of individual brilliance. Yet, it was not just the sum of these individual talents that made the team so remarkable; it was the seamless fusion of their abilities into a collective performance that transcended personal glory. Their play was not merely a display of technical mastery, but an exuberant reassertion of *jogo bonito*, a celebration of football that invited all who cherish the beautiful game to believe in its power once again.

At the heart of this team stood Pelé, the undisputed icon, often regarded as the first among equals in a group of extraordinary talents. Yet, alongside him, were other figures who left indelible marks on the tournament. Rivelino, with his cannonball shots, Tostão, whose elegance was matched by an almost brutal grace, and Jairzinho, whose star was on the rise, all contributed to the brilliance of the Seleção. But it was Carlos Alberto, the imperious captain, whose majestic fourth goal in the final against Italy became the defining moment of Brazil’s World Cup triumph, leading his team to glory and immortalizing their place in football history.

However, there was one player whose contribution, though often overshadowed by the more flamboyant stars, was indispensable to the team’s success. Gérson de Oliveira Nunes, known simply as Gérson, may not have garnered the same level of adulation as Pelé or Carlos Alberto, but his role was nothing short of pivotal. Often described as the brain of the team, Gérson was the linchpin around which the team’s fluid attacking play revolved. His vision and composure in midfield allowed him to dictate the tempo of the game, pulling the strings that made the rest of the team dance to the irresistible rhythm of their collective brilliance. While his name may not be the first to come to mind when recalling the 1970 World Cup, Gérson’s influence on the pitch was profound, his quiet genius providing the foundation for Brazil’s most celebrated victory.

The Start of a Football Journey

 Born in the winter of 1941, Gérson de Oliveira Nunes—later to be immortalized by the moniker Canhotinha de Ouro (Golden Left Foot)—seemed destined by the hand of fate to become a footballer. His lineage was steeped in the sport; both his father and uncle were professional players, with his father also being a close confidant of the legendary Zizinho. This pedigree, rich in footballing heritage, would be honoured by Gérson with a career that transcended the ordinary.

As a teenager, Gérson’s rise to prominence was swift and inevitable. He joined Flamengo, where his innate talent was quickly apparent. His ability to transition the ball from defence to attack with a single, incisive pass, to control the tempo of the game with unhurried precision, and to orchestrate play with an almost prophetic sense of timing, set him apart. These gifts—rarely seen even at the highest level—marked him as a player of exceptional vision and intelligence. His capacity to read the game, to probe and prompt with an intuitive understanding of when and how to execute each option, suggested a maturity far beyond his years.

At this early juncture in his career, Gérson’s talent drew inevitable comparisons to Didi, the linchpin of the Brazilian national team at the time. It was the highest of praises and one that placed Gérson in the company of Brazil’s finest. Although he lacked the blistering speed that often defined great players, his footballing intellect embodied the adage that the first five yards of a player’s pace reside in the mind. In this, Gérson was the epitome of cerebral football, his awareness and anticipation allowing him to outmanoeuvre opponents without the need for rapid acceleration.

Such mastery of the game, however, requires not only talent but the self-assurance to recognize one’s own potential and the audacity to execute it on the grandest stage. Gérson possessed this self-belief in abundance. It was a characteristic that would define not only his playing days but also his post-football career. His confidence in his abilities, coupled with a refusal to accept anything less than the highest level of competition, would shape the trajectory of his professional life.

Less than a year after making his debut for Flamengo, Gérson’s prodigious talents were recognized on a broader stage when he was selected for the Brazilian team that contested the 1959 Pan-American Games. The following year, he represented Brazil at the Rome Olympics, where he scored four goals, although Brazil’s campaign ended at the group stage. By this point, it was evident to both club and national team managers that Gérson was not merely a promising young player, but a rare and exceptional talent in the making. His development was a story of inevitable progression, a gem polished through experience and destined for greatness.

The Flamengo Days

 Back at Flamengo’s Ilha do Urubu stadium in Rio, the club’s Paraguayan manager, Fleitas Solich, entrusted Gérson with the role of the team’s primary creative force. This decision was mirrored by national coach Aymoré Moreira, who called up the young playmaker to the Brazilian squad that would defend their World Cup title in Chile—an honour that had been sealed by Pelé’s iconic performances in Sweden four years earlier. However, Gérson’s dreams of contributing to Brazil’s bid for a second consecutive triumph were shattered by a knee injury. As Pelé, Garrincha, and the rest of the Seleção lifted the trophy once more, Gérson was left on the sidelines, a cruel reminder that injury would often thwart his career at pivotal moments.

In his four years with Flamengo, Gérson played over 150 league matches, scoring an impressive 80 goals—a remarkable tally for a player primarily tasked with orchestrating play from midfield. Despite this success and the adoration of the fans, Gérson’s relentless desire to improve led him to leave the club in 1963, seeking new challenges that would test his talents further.

One such challenge came the previous year when Flamengo faced Botafogo in the final of the Rio Championship. It was a high-stakes match, an opportunity for the young midfielder to showcase his abilities on a grand stage. Yet, in a tactical move that would test his versatility, Gérson’s manager instructed him to abandon his attacking instincts and focus instead on a man-marking job against Botafogo’s star player, the legendary Garrincha. It was a defensive assignment that contrasted sharply with Gérson’s usual role as the creative heartbeat of his team.

This tactical shift was reminiscent of the approach taken by Helmut Schön during the 1970 World Cup, when he tasked Franz Beckenbauer with man-marking England’s Bobby Charlton in the quarter-finals. However, there was a key difference: Beckenbauer was a seasoned international, already in his second World Cup, and his ability to adapt to such a role was honed through years of experience. In contrast, Gérson was a young player still learning the nuances of top-level football, and the task of neutralizing Garrincha—one of the most elusive and unpredictable players of all time—was a far greater challenge. Whereas Beckenbauer’s defensive duties allowed him to eventually unshackle himself and influence the game once Charlton was substituted, Gérson’s inexperience made his task far more daunting. The weight of the responsibility, coupled with the complexity of facing a player of Garrincha’s calibre, underscored the vast gap between theory and execution for a young talent still in the process of defining his career.

Signing for Botafogo

 The task of man-marking Garrincha was, in fact, a challenge beyond even the world’s most accomplished defenders, a reality underscored in two World Cups. It came as no great surprise—perhaps only to Flamengo’s manager—that despite Gérson’s determined adherence to his tactical assignment, the job proved insurmountable for such a young and relatively inexperienced player. Botafogo triumphed 3-0, and Gérson’s influence on the match was minimal, his attempts to fulfil his defensive duties largely ineffectually.

For Gérson, this failure was frustrating but hardly unexpected. It marked a turning point in his relationship with Flamengo, leading him to reject a contract renewal the following year. The decision to leave the club and join his conquerors seemed almost inevitable. The old adage, “If you can’t beat them, join them,” may well have echoed in his mind as he made the move to Botafogo. There, he would play alongside Garrincha for the next few years, though the "Little Bird" would soon leave the nest to join Corinthians, leaving Gérson to continue his journey with the Fogão.

For any young Brazilian footballer, a move to Botafogo was a coveted opportunity. At the time, the club boasted one of the most illustrious squads in the country. Alongside Garrincha, Gérson would join a roster that included Didi—whose style had often been compared to Gérson’s own—Nílton Santos, and Mário Zagallo, each of whom added their own creative spark to the team’s brilliance. To play alongside such luminaries was a rare privilege, and Gérson flourished in the company of these footballing giants. His move to Botafogo marked the beginning of a highly successful chapter in his career. The club won the Rio-São Paulo Championship in both 1966 and 1967, and in 1967 and 1968, they also claimed the Rio Championship. The pinnacle of this period came in 1968, when Botafogo secured their first national title, lifting the Brazilian Cup after defeating Fortaleza in the final. In this fertile environment, Gérson’s talent blossomed, and he became an integral part of a team that would go down in history as one of Brazil’s finest.

Genesis of a World Champion

The 1966 World Cup proved to be a cruel chapter in Gérson’s career, a tournament that did little to enhance his reputation despite his undeniable talent. Brazil, having won two consecutive titles, travelled to England with high hopes of completing a historic hat-trick. Yet, the tournament unfolded as a nightmare. Brazil’s campaign was marred by a brutal physicality that bordered on barbaric, a treatment that could be likened to the malevolent image of breaking a butterfly upon a wheel, as Alexander Pope once wrote. While it’s true that Gérson’s performances were underwhelming, one could hardly blame him given the circumstances. The tournament, a cruel and violent ordeal, left its mark on the entire team, and Gérson would take four years to put matters right.

In 1969, Gérson’s time with Botafogo came to an end, having achieved considerable success. Over nearly 250 league appearances, he scored close to a century of goals—an impressive tally for a player whose primary role was as a playmaker. Yet, in a squad brimming with attacking talent, his goal-scoring potential might have been even greater had he been the focal point of the attack. Seeking new challenges, Gérson moved to São Paulo in 1969, a decision that would mark the beginning of a fresh chapter in his illustrious career. However, just as he had in the past, injury once again cast a shadow over his prospects for the 1970 World Cup, threatening to derail his third attempt at the ultimate prize.

Despite these setbacks, Gérson was selected for Brazil’s opening match against Czechoslovakia. However, just past the hour mark, with Brazil leading 3-1, Gérson was forced to leave the field due to injury, missing the final two group-stage matches against England and Romania. Brazil managed to secure victories in both, including a tense 1-0 win over England, but the absence of their cerebral midfielder was felt. When Gérson returned for the quarter-final against Peru, Brazil’s fortunes seemed to shift. With him back in the fold, the Seleção regained their rhythm, dispatching Peru 4-2 before cruising to a 3-1 victory over Uruguay in the semi-finals.

The final against Italy, however, would test Brazil’s mettle in ways they hadn’t anticipated. After Pelé’s early header put Brazil ahead, it seemed as though the match would follow the expected script, with the Azzurri fading under the weight of their exhaustion after a gruelling 4-3 semi-final victory over West Germany. But when Roberto Boninsegna capitalized on a defensive lapse to equalize, Brazil’s confidence faltered. The equalizer punctured their momentum, and Italy, reinvigorated by the unexpected turn of events, gained belief.

It is often said that the best team in a tournament does not always win the World Cup—just ask the Hungarian team of 1954, who were defeated by West Germany in the final despite having trounced them 8-3 in the group stages. Brazil needed a catalyst to reignite their game, a player capable of lifting the team’s spirits and reasserting control. Gérson, the orchestrator of Brazil’s midfield, was that player. As the match wore on, Brazil regained their composure and dominance, and it was Gérson who, just past the hour mark, struck the decisive blow. His goal restored Brazil’s lead and propelled them towards their third World Cup triumph. While much of the attention was rightly focused on Pelé and Carlos Alberto, it was Gérson who had steered the ship through turbulent waters, and his emotional reaction at the final whistle, as he was swept up in the euphoria of Brazil’s greatest achievement, was a poignant reminder of his central role in their victory.

After 75 league appearances for São Paulo, Gérson made his final move, returning to his boyhood club, Fluminense. His time there, however, was brief and less illustrious, as injuries and the toll of age began to diminish his influence on the field. Over two years, he made 57 league appearances and scored just five goals—far from the prolific numbers he had once posted. Gérson’s career, which had spanned 533 league games across four clubs, came to an end in 1974, with almost 200 goals to his name. On the international stage, he earned 85 caps for Brazil, winning 61 of those matches and scoring 19 goals. But none of those goals were as significant as the one he scored in the 1970 World Cup final, a strike that restored Brazil’s lead and ultimately secured their victory. His final appearance for the Seleção came in July 1972, a fitting conclusion to his international career, as Brazil triumphed 1-0 over Portugal in what was another hard-fought victory.

A Gem in The Centre of Park

 Although Gérson was primarily deployed as a holding midfielder, his role in the 1970 World Cup-winning Brazilian team transcended the conventional expectations of the position. As Jonathan Wilson astutely observed in a 2013 article for The Guardian, Gérson was an early and pioneering example of a more creative interpretation of the holding midfielder role—one focused not merely on regaining possession, but on controlling the game through ball retention and precise passing. His approach to the position was a harmonious blend of tactical intelligence, technical mastery, and an almost instinctive understanding of the flow of the game.

In this capacity, Gérson was the cerebral force behind Brazil’s triumph, often described as the "brain" of the team. His ability to dictate the tempo of play from midfield, to calm the game when necessary and accelerate it when the moment demanded, marked him as a player of exceptional vision and composure. His passing, renowned for its accuracy and elegance, allowed him to orchestrate play from deep positions, setting the rhythm for his teammates and ensuring that the ball was always moving with purpose. Gérson’s capacity to switch from defence to attack with a single, incisive long ball—often delivered with a precision that seemed almost preordained—was one of the defining features of his game. His vision allowed him to spot runs and make passes that would launch his team forward with devastating effect, a hallmark of Brazil's fluid, attacking style.

Gérson’s technical gifts were matched by his tactical acumen. He possessed an exceptional positional sense, always appearing in the right place at the right time, whether to intercept an opposing pass or to dictate the next phase of play. His deep understanding of the game allowed him to remain composed under pressure, and his decisions were invariably calculated to benefit the team as a whole. Yet, despite his role as a facilitator, he was no stranger to taking matters into his own hands when required. His powerful left foot, which could strike the ball with precision and force, earned him the nickname *Canhotinha de Ouro* (Golden Left Foot), a fitting tribute to one of the most formidable weapons in his arsenal.

Regarded as one of the finest passers in football history, Gérson’s influence extended far beyond the statistics of goals and assists. His legacy lies in his ability to shape the game, to turn fleeting moments into opportunities for his team, and to play with a calmness and intelligence that belied the intensity of the competition. In a team filled with stars, Gérson’s brilliance was often understated, but his importance to Brazil’s success in 1970 cannot be overstated. He was, quite simply, the engine that drove one of the greatest teams ever assembled, and his contributions to the beautiful game continue to resonate with those who understand the artistry of midfield play.

The After Years – A Bold Critic

 Even after his retirement, Gérson remained a prominent figure in Brazilian football, though not always for the most positive reasons. In 1976, he found himself at the centre of controversy when he appeared in a commercial for Vila Rica cigarettes. The ad, which featured Gérson declaring, “I like to take advantage of everything, right? You too take advantage!” was interpreted by many as a tacit endorsement of the morally dubious "Jeitinho Brasileiro"—the cultural tendency to circumvent laws and social norms to achieve personal gain. Whether by design or sheer misjudgment, the phrase resonated as an endorsement of corruption and bribery, a sentiment that Gérson would later regret. He clarified that this was never his intention, and he expressed remorse for having participated in the commercial, acknowledging the unfortunate implications of his involvement.

Beyond the commercial, Gérson’s post-retirement years were marked by a series of public spats, including a notable falling-out with Pelé. When Pelé released his list of the 125 Greatest Footballers of All Time, Gérson was notably absent. This omission, particularly given his instrumental role in Brazil's 1970 World Cup victory, rankled Gérson’s strong sense of self-belief. He voiced his displeasure with characteristic candour, publicly criticizing the list, which he felt failed to acknowledge the greatness of himself and several of his 1970 teammates. In a memorable protest, Gérson visited a local radio station, where he dramatically tore up a piece of paper symbolizing Pelé’s list. “I respect his opinion, but I don’t agree,” he declared, his frustration palpable. “Apart from Zidane, Platini, and Fontaine, I’m behind 11 Frenchmen? It’s a joke to hear this.”

Gérson’s outspokenness didn’t stop there. He also took aim at the new generation of Brazilian footballers, particularly Neymar. In a conversation with Fox Sports, Gérson expressed doubt that Neymar, despite his exceptional talent and astronomical transfer fees, would have earned a spot in Brazil’s 1970 World Cup squad. With the likes of Pelé, Jairzinho, Tostão, and Rivelino already established in the starting lineup, Gérson was adamant that Neymar would not have displaced any of them. “There wouldn’t be a space for Neymar,” he asserted, dismissing the possibility of the modern superstar fitting into the team, even as a substitute. He pointed to Caju, a player of immense talent who had struggled to secure a starting role in that illustrious squad, as an example of the competition Neymar would have faced. “I don’t even know if Neymar would have a place on the bench in that team,” Gérson remarked, reinforcing his belief that the current generation of players, despite their fame and success, did not measure up to the legendary figures of Brazil’s golden era.

In his later years, Gérson transitioned into a new role as a football commentator for Rio’s radio stations, lending his distinctive voice and insight to the games he once played. While he may no longer be on the pitch, his passion for the game remains evident as he provides a bridge between the action on the field and the fans who listen intently to his every word. Despite the emergence of players like Neymar, who commands global attention, there remains a deep nostalgia among many Brazilian football fans for the days when Canhotinha de Ouro donned the Canarinho shirt. In their eyes, Gérson’s golden left foot and cerebral approach to the game represent a standard of excellence that the modern generation may never quite reach.

Conclusion

 Gérson de Oliveira Nunes was undeniably a player of rare and exceptional talent, a once-in-a-generation figure whose career was marked by both extraordinary fortune and poignant misfortune. To have played alongside the constellation of stars at Botafogo, with the likes of Garrincha, Didi, and Nilton Santos, must have been a source of immense pride and joy. Yet, it was his role in Brazil’s national team, which triumphed in three World Cups over four tournaments, that truly elevated his legacy. Few footballers can claim to have been part of such a golden era, and for Gérson, the opportunity to display his remarkable talents on the world stage was the fulfilment of any footballer's dream.

However, the brilliance of Gérson’s career is tempered by a lingering question: in any other generation, would his extraordinary midfield talents have received the recognition they deserved? In an era where the dazzling brilliance of Pelé often cast a shadow over his contemporaries, one wonders whether Gérson’s contributions—so central to the success of Brazil’s 1970 World Cup-winning team—might have been more widely acknowledged. Would his cerebral style of play, marked by his precise passing, exceptional vision, and ability to dictate the tempo of the game, have garnered greater acclaim had he not been overshadowed by the presence of Pelé and other luminaries?

It is a question that remains speculative, but one that speaks to the complexities of footballing history. Perhaps, in a different context, Gérson's genius might have shone even more brightly, and he might have secured a place on Pelé’s infamous list of the greatest footballers—a place he undoubtedly earned through his intellectual mastery of the game. Ultimately, Gérson was the brain behind one of the most extraordinary teams in football history, and his contribution to Brazil’s success is a legacy that should not be diminished, even if the full recognition of his greatness remains a matter of what might have been.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Resilience Redefined: India’s Epic Fightbacks and the Revival of Test Cricket’s Soul

 

The notion that cricket is about fours and sixes, promoted by so-called experts funded by T20 league owners, is a travesty of the sport's essence. Cricket thrives in its longer formats, where the battle of wits between bowler and batsman unfolds over time. It is here that the nuances of the game emerge: a bowler pondering strategies, a captain orchestrating fields, and a batsman valuing his wicket like a treasure. Can the soul of cricket be encapsulated in a 20-over shootout? Never.

Cricket’s legacy lies in its ability to test character and skill. The bat is not merely a weapon for brute force but a shield to defend, a tool to craft an innings, and a symbol of resilience.

A Tale of Contrasts: Pakistan at Bay Oval and India at Sydney

On December 3, 2020, Pakistan and New Zealand engaged in a gripping Test at Bay Oval. Pakistan, known for their unpredictability, gave a glimmer of hope with Fawad Alam and Mohammad Rizwan’s inspiring partnership. At a juncture where prudence dictated playing for a draw, Pakistan’s adventurous streak led to a loss. A draw would have bolstered their fragile confidence, but they chose the path of recklessness.

A few weeks later, India found themselves in a similar predicament against Australia. But unlike Pakistan, India demonstrated grit and determination, scripting one of the greatest comebacks in Test history.

The Challenge at Sydney: A Mountain to Climb

On the fourth day at the Sydney Cricket Ground, India faced an improbable target of 407 runs in the fourth innings, with over 130 overs to survive. The team was plagued by injuries, missing their captain, and morale seemed low. When Shubman Gill and Rohit Sharma provided a steady start, hope flickered. However, Australia struck late, ending the day with smiles, confident of victory.

Enter Cheteshwar Pujara, the epitome of stoic resistance. As dawn broke on Day 5, many Indian fans braved the early winter morning to witness what seemed an inevitable defeat. Yet, they clung to the faint hope that Pujara might orchestrate a miracle.

The Pant-Pujara Symphony

Australia struck early, dismissing Ajinkya Rahane with a delivery that betrayed extra drift, caught expertly at short-leg. A collapse loomed, but Rishabh Pant—injured yet undeterred—strode to the crease. As Ravichandran Ashwin later revealed, Pant’s elbow injury was severe, but his resolve was unyielding.

Pant began cautiously, scoring 5 off 33 balls, enduring body blows and testing deliveries. But once settled, he unleashed his audacious stroke play, targeting Nathan Lyon with calculated aggression. Dancing down the track, he sent Lyon’s deliveries soaring over the ropes. The momentum shifted, and Australia’s confidence began to waver.

Pant’s innings was a masterclass in controlled aggression. While Pujara held one end with unshakable resolve, Pant’s flamboyance kept the scoreboard ticking. His 97-run knock was a blend of courage and artistry, a counterpunch that rattled Australia.

The Ashwin-Vihari Epic

With Pant and Pujara dismissed, the onus fell on Hanuma Vihari and Ravichandran Ashwin. Vihari, nursing a hamstring injury, and Ashwin battling back pain, faced an uphill task. Australia threw everything at them: reverse swing, relentless short balls, and close-in fielders. Yet, the duo held firm.

Ashwin bore the brunt of Australia’s hostility, taking blows to his body but refusing to yield. Vihari, despite his restricted movement, displayed impeccable technique and focus. Together, they batted for over three and a half hours, facing 258 deliveries to secure an improbable draw.

A Testament to Resilience

This was no ordinary draw. It was a statement of character, a testament to the indomitable spirit of a team that had been written off after their humiliation in Adelaide. India’s effort at Sydney was a celebration of Test cricket’s enduring appeal—a format that demands skill, patience, and mental fortitude.

Lessons for the Modern Game

India’s performances at Melbourne and Sydney have reignited the essence of Test cricket. These matches showcased the beauty of the longer format, where patience triumphs over haste, and character outshines flair. Teams and fans enamoured by the instant gratification of T20 must recognize that Test cricket is the ultimate proving ground. It is here that legends are forged and the true spirit of the game is celebrated.

 Thank You

Faisal Caesar