New Zealand’s Triumph: A Rare Caribbean Collapse and the End of an Era for Jeremy Coney

New Zealand’s five-wicket victory in this historic contest not only levelled the series but also marked a rare and humbling defeat for the mighty West Indies in a three-day Test—a phenomenon last witnessed in 1965 when they fell to Australia in Port-of-Spain. For a team that had dominated world cricket with relentless authority, this result was a stark reminder that even the most formidable can falter under pressure. Yet, this was no ordinary collapse; it was a story shaped by inclement weather, a tricky pitch, and an uncharacteristic lack of discipline from a West Indian batting lineup accustomed to imposing itself rather than succumbing meekly. 

The match, already shortened due to two days of relentless rain, began under conditions that were anything but ideal for batting. The dampness of the pitch, coupled with the unpredictable nature of the outfield, placed the side winning the toss in a highly advantageous position. That privilege fell to New Zealand, and they seized it with intent. Spearheaded by their legendary seamer Richard Hadlee and the tireless Ewen Chatfield, the Kiwis turned the conditions into a weapon, exposing the vulnerabilities of a West Indian batting order that seemed to lack its usual poise and patience. 

A Shocking Collapse: Hadlee and Chatfield Dismantle the West Indies

From the moment Hadlee shattered Desmond Haynes’ defences with the first ball of the third over, the West Indies innings began to unravel. The normally resolute Caribbean top order crumbled under relentless swing and seam movement, as New Zealand’s bowlers found the edges with precision. Five of the dismissals came through catches in the slip cordon, a testament to the discipline and relentless pressure exerted by Hadlee and Chatfield. 

Despite an expensive start—conceding 25 runs in his first four overs—Hadlee quickly recalibrated his approach, striking at regular intervals to keep the hosts in disarray. Chatfield, on the other hand, was a model of consistency, bowling eighteen overs on the trot, maintaining a stranglehold over the batsmen, and refusing to offer a single loose delivery. 

West Indies’ innings was an uncharacteristic display of fragility. Vivian Richards, Richie Richardson, and Jeffrey Dujon—all accomplished stroke-makers—were unable to counter the New Zealand attack. Had it not been for the last-wicket partnership between Tony Gray and Courtney Walsh, the hosts might have faced the ignominy of recording their lowest-ever total against New Zealand. They were eventually bowled out for 100—only marginally better than their previous worst of 77 against the Kiwis. 

The Crowe Brothers Lead New Zealand’s Response

With a paltry total to chase, New Zealand appeared to be in control, but their innings too began with jitters. Both openers, debutant Matthew Horne and John Wright, fell cheaply to first-slip catches, offering West Indies a glimmer of hope. However, the Crowe brothers, Martin and Jeff, turned the tide, constructing a vital 156-run partnership that firmly established New Zealand’s dominance. 

Fortune favoured them at crucial junctures. Jeff was dropped early off Malcolm Marshall’s bowling, while Martin survived two lives—once at slip off Richards and later at gully off Marshall. But despite these moments of fortune, Martin Crowe played a commanding innings, driving and pulling with authority, striking thirteen boundaries. He seemed destined for his third century of the series until an ill-judged pull against Marshall left him 17 runs short. 

New Zealand continued to build on this foundation, with captain Jeremy Coney and all-rounder John Bracewell contributing valuable runs. Bracewell, in particular, took advantage of a demoralized West Indian attack, smashing two sixes and four boundaries in a lively 66. His last 39 runs came off just 29 balls after tea, underlining the visitors’ growing confidence. By the time Coney declared, New Zealand had amassed a commanding lead of 232 runs, leaving the West Indies in an unfamiliar position—chasing a large deficit on home soil. 

West Indies’ Second Innings: A Display of Recklessness

If there was ever a moment for the West Indies to summon their famous resilience, this was it. Gordon Greenidge, showing signs of intent, launched Bracewell for a six in the final over of the day, hinting at an aggressive response. But the following morning, their innings fell apart dramatically. 

In the span of two deliveries, both openers perished—Haynes falling to the sixth ball of the day, Greenidge to the seventh. With their dismissals, all semblance of resistance faded. Instead of digging in, West Indies batted with an air of abandon, surrendering their wickets with uncharacteristic carelessness. The approach was epitomized by Vivian Richards, who walked in at 80 for three and unleashed a flurry of boundaries. In typical fashion, he tore into Hadlee, dispatching him for five fours off the first seven deliveries he faced. However, his aggression quickly turned reckless, as he slashed at a delivery too close to cut and edged behind—one of five wickets claimed by Martin Snedden in a superb spell. 

There was a brief stand of defiance between Dujon and Marshall, who added 77 for the seventh wicket, but it was only a delay of the inevitable. West Indies were eventually bowled out, setting New Zealand a modest target of 33. 

A Late Fightback, but a Fitting End for Coney

Chasing such a small total should have been a mere formality, but Walsh and Gray bowled with genuine pace and hostility, momentarily unsettling the New Zealand batsmen. Gray, supplementing his aggressive bowling with two stunning catches—one at slip, the other at gully—provided a reminder of the West Indies’ natural brilliance in the field. But in the grand scheme, it was a mere gesture. The visitors completed their well-earned victory with 25 minutes remaining in the day. 

There was a poetic end to the match, as the last New Zealand wicket to fall in their chase was that of Jeremy Coney. Playing in his final Test, the veteran captain was given a rousing ovation by the crowd—a tribute to his leadership and the role he played in shaping this New Zealand side into a competitive force. 

Conclusion: A Rare Defeat for the Caribbean Giants

For a decade, the West Indies had reigned supreme, their invincibility at home rarely questioned. But in this match, their batting frailties were ruthlessly exposed by a disciplined and determined New Zealand unit. While Hadlee’s brilliance was expected, it was the collective effort of the Kiwi side—Chatfield’s unrelenting accuracy, Snedden’s incisive bowling, and the resilience of the Crowe brothers—that ensured victory. 

This was more than just a win for New Zealand; it was a statement. They had not only levelled the series but had also punctured the aura of invincibility that had surrounded West Indies for so long. It was a match where discipline triumphed over flair, where patience outlasted aggression, and where, for once, the mighty Caribbean giants found themselves on the wrong side of history.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

The Eden Gardens Miracle: A Triumph of Grit, Glory, and Redemption

Cricket has often been described as a game of glorious uncertainties, but few matches have exemplified this axiom as profoundly as the historic Kolkata Test of 2001 between India and Australia. What unfolded at Eden Gardens was not just a cricket match—it was an epic saga of defiance, endurance, and redemption, culminating in one of the greatest comebacks in the history of Test cricket. It was only the third instance in Test history where a team that had followed on emerged victorious, and for the third time, Australia was on the receiving end of this rare humiliation. 

At the heart of India’s sensational fightback were two heroes who etched their names into cricketing folklore—VVS Laxman, whose silken strokeplay mesmerized the world, and Rahul Dravid, whose unwavering resilience formed the backbone of India's resurgence. Complementing their heroics was Harbhajan Singh, whose remarkable off-spin wizardry not only brought India’s first-ever Test hat-trick but also dismantled the mighty Australians when it mattered most. 

Australia’s Early Dominance and Harbhajan’s Hat-trick

The visitors began with characteristic authority, asserting their dominance on a surface that initially offered little for the bowlers. The foundation of their imposing first-innings total of 445 was laid by Matthew Hayden, who combined brute force with calculated aggression to compile a commanding 97. Steve Waugh, the indomitable Australian captain, further strengthened their grip with a defiant century, guiding his team through a late-order collapse triggered by the young Harbhajan Singh. The off-spinner’s devastating spell saw him claim India’s first-ever Test hat-trick, dismissing Ricky Ponting, Adam Gilchrist, and Shane Warne in rapid succession. Despite this setback, Australia’s tail wagged admirably, as Jason Gillespie and Glenn McGrath offered staunch resistance, helping Waugh extend the innings before he eventually fell for a fighting 110. 

India’s First-Innings Collapse and the Spark of a Fightback 

With the pitch still playing true, India had every reason to mount a strong reply, but what followed was a nightmare. A rampant Glenn McGrath tore through the Indian top order with surgical precision, his relentless accuracy yielding figures of 4 for 18. India crumbled for a paltry 171, handing Australia a colossal lead of 274. The match seemed all but over. 

Yet, amidst the ruins, a glimmer of hope emerged. VVS Laxman’s 59 was a rare moment of defiance, a stroke-filled innings that hinted at the elegance and tenacity he would soon unleash in full force. Recognizing his brilliance, the Indian think tank made a crucial decision—promoting Laxman to No. 3 in the second innings. It was a move that would alter the course of history. 

Laxman and Dravid: The Epic Partnership That Defied Fate

What followed was an exhibition of batting that transcended the realm of sport and entered the domain of legend. Laxman, with his effortless grace, and Dravid, with his stoic determination, produced a partnership of such monumental brilliance that it single-handedly reversed India’s fortunes. For over ten and a half hours, the duo blunted, dismantled, and demoralized the Australian attack. Laxman’s strokeplay was an aesthetic marvel—his wristy flicks and regal drives flowed like poetry in motion. Meanwhile, Dravid was the immovable rock at the other end, absorbing every challenge with unflappable concentration. 

Their unbroken stand of 335 runs on the fourth day—without losing a wicket—was a feat of superhuman endurance. By the time they were finally separated at 376, they had rewritten record books, eclipsing multiple Indian and international milestones. Laxman’s 281, the highest individual score for India at the time, was a masterpiece, and Dravid’s 180 was the perfect complement to it. 

With the lead swelling past 380, Sourav Ganguly boldly declared at 657 for 7, setting Australia an improbable target of 384. The stage was now set for an exhilarating finish. 

Harbhajan and Tendulkar Weave a Web of Spin

Australia, accustomed to steamrolling opposition, had the batting depth to chase or at least save the game. Openers Hayden and Michael Slater began watchfully, adding 74 runs and raising visions of an escape. But once the breakthrough came, the visitors unravelled. 

Harbhajan, continuing his golden spell, spun a web around the Australians, picking up six wickets in the second innings. Tendulkar, often overshadowed for his bowling, delivered three crucial blows, including the prized scalps of Hayden and Gilchrist—who suffered the ignominy of a king pair. The mighty Australians, who had won 16 consecutive Tests, were bowled out for 212, their invincibility shattered. 

Conclusion: A Victory for the Ages

When the final Australian wicket fell, Eden Gardens erupted in sheer ecstasy. This was more than just a Test match victory—it was a triumph of perseverance over adversity, a testament to the resilience of a team that refused to surrender. The Kolkata Test of 2001 became a defining moment in Indian cricket, proving that mental strength and self-belief could triumph against the greatest of odds. 

Laxman’s artistry, Dravid’s grit, and Harbhajan’s brilliance ensured that this match would forever be etched in cricketing folklore. For Steve Waugh’s Australians, it was a rare setback in an otherwise dominant era. But for India, it was the dawn of a new chapter—a chapter that heralded their rise as a cricketing powerhouse, ready to challenge and conquer the best in the world.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Sri Lanka's Historic Test Victory: A Masterclass of Resilience and Skill in Napier

Sri Lanka's historic first-ever Test win overseas came in a compelling encounter against New Zealand at Napier, a victory that transcended individual brilliance and highlighted the collective strength of a team that had, until then, been more often known for its struggles on foreign soil. The match was defined by dramatic shifts in momentum, patient batting, disciplined bowling, and the breaking of several records. The narrative of this Test victory was shaped not only by Sri Lanka’s tactical ingenuity but also by New Zealand’s inability to adapt to the pressures exerted by their opponents, despite having the home advantage.

The Pitch and Early Drama

The Napier pitch, typically renowned for its hard and true nature, was unusually green, with a solid covering of grass that offered abundant assistance to seam bowlers. This shift in surface conditions caught both teams by surprise. New Zealand, with their pace attack led by the towering Kerry Walmsley (6ft 8in), the aggressive Chris Nash, and the experienced Ewen Morrison, sensed an opportunity to dominate. The early signs were indeed ominous for Sri Lanka, as their top order collapsed to 88 for six.

Despite the evident danger, the match began with a palpable sense of anticipation as New Zealand opted to bowl first after winning the toss. Walmsley and Nash, though erratic at times, were able to extract significant movement off the pitch. By the end of the first day, 13 wickets had fallen, a clear indication of the pitch's unpredictability.

Sri Lanka's Resilient Fightback

The collapse of 88 for six initially seemed to spell disaster for Sri Lanka. However, the partnership between Arjuna Ranatunga and Chaminda Vaas, which saw a gritty stand of 49 runs, helped steady the ship. Ranatunga, in particular, played an important role, becoming the first Sri Lankan to score 3,000 Test runs during his knock of 39. This achievement provided a glimmer of hope amidst the gloom.

Sri Lanka’s eventual recovery to 183 all out suggested that the pitch might be losing some of its venom. However, the turnaround was led by the disciplined bowling of Wickremasinghe and Vaas, who continued to extract movement from the surface. With sharp deliveries that beat the batsmen both in the air and off the pitch, Sri Lanka reduced New Zealand to 109 all out in their first innings, a remarkable collapse that set the tone for the rest of the match.

Vaas, in particular, shone brightly with figures of 5 for 47, marking the first time in his career that he had taken five wickets in a Test match. This performance exemplified Sri Lanka's newfound tactical maturity. The New Zealand top order crumbled under the relentless pressure, and their resistance evaporated quickly.

Sri Lanka’s Second Innings: A Battle for Survival

In their second innings, Sri Lanka seemed to be repeating the early frailties that had defined their first innings. At 22 for three, the possibility of defeat loomed large. However, the experienced pair of Tillekeratne and De Silva revived Sri Lanka’s chances. The two batsmen formed a resilient partnership that, despite the early setbacks, extended their stand to a solid 129 runs by the end of the day.

Tillekeratne, known for his stubborn approach, played a gritty knock of 74, while De Silva’s calm presence at the crease allowed the partnership to grow. Their combined effort provided much-needed stability. However, it was the innings of debutant wicketkeeper Dunusinghe that truly brought a sense of assurance to Sri Lanka's campaign. Batting with the tail, Dunusinghe played a patient knock, reaching 91 off 323 minutes. His effort helped Sri Lanka set a more substantial target, and it was clear that the pitch had become less treacherous, allowing the batting side to counter-attack with greater confidence.

New Zealand’s Struggles: Injuries and Inconsistent Play

New Zealand, already hindered by injuries to key seamers like Morrison and Nash, found their attack increasingly ineffective. The Auckland trio of Pringle, Su’a, and Walmsley were tasked with spearheading the bowling attack, but the absence of Thomson, who was omitted due to a drop in form, hurt the balance of the New Zealand side.

Despite these setbacks, New Zealand's fielding errors compounded their woes. Sri Lanka capitalized on several chances that New Zealand’s fielders misjudged. This lapse in discipline, particularly with dropped catches, provided Sri Lanka with much-needed momentum. As the match wore on, New Zealand’s inability to bowl Sri Lanka out and finish the game became more apparent.

Muralitharan and Vaas: A Deadly Combination

Needing 427 runs to win in five sessions, New Zealand’s challenge was formidable. The spin of Muttiah Muralitharan, combined with Vaas’s deadly pace, proved to be too much. Muralitharan, with his sharp off-spin and bounce, took command of the New Zealand innings. While the New Zealand top order made some early progress, including a brief counter-attack from Murray and Greatbatch, the Sri Lankan spinners stifled any real progress.

Vaas's five-wicket haul in the second innings (match figures of 10 for 90) was the game’s turning point. His removal of key New Zealand batsmen, coupled with Muralitharan’s wizardry, dismantled the New Zealand side with clinical precision. New Zealand was bowled out for 141, leaving Sri Lanka to bask in the glory of their first Test victory on foreign soil.

The Final Stages: A Historic Moment for Sri Lanka

In the final moments of the match, Sri Lanka found themselves in complete control. Their ability to adapt to the pitch, combined with disciplined performances from both their batting and bowling units, overwhelmed New Zealand. The partnership between Tillekeratne and Gurusinha, which extended through to the final day, had provided a solid base for Sri Lanka to recover from earlier setbacks. Gurusinha’s monumental 127, his sixth Test century, and Tillekeratne’s stubborn 74 were instrumental in ensuring that Sri Lanka achieved a sizeable lead.

As the final stages unfolded, the New Zealand team could do little to stop the inevitable. With the light fading, the umpires called the match to an end, confirming Sri Lanka's triumph. The match ended in a draw, but it was a draw that ensured Sri Lanka’s first overseas series win, a momentous achievement in the history of Sri Lankan cricket.

Conclusion: A Victory Beyond Statistics

Sri Lanka’s victory was not simply a case of individual brilliance. It was a victory that encompassed the team’s resilience, tactical astuteness, and collective strength. From Ranatunga’s historic milestone to Vaas’s match-winning performance and Muralitharan’s spin magic, every aspect of Sri Lanka’s play came together in a perfect storm. The New Zealand side, despite some individual efforts, lacked the consistency and discipline required to handle the pressure exerted by their opponents.

This Test victory in Napier will forever be etched in Sri Lanka's cricketing history as the moment the team truly arrived on the world stage, proving their ability to win in challenging conditions and marking the beginning of a new era for Sri Lankan cricket.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Mark Waugh’s Masterpiece: A Triumph in Turbulence

Amid the lush grass of St George’s Park, where the pitch bore a thick mat reminiscent of an English county ground from the 1950s, Australia and South Africa played out a Test of shifting fortunes and simmering tensions. What unfolded was a contest where every session rewrote the narrative, and yet, in the end, it was Mark Waugh’s sublime fourth-innings century—arguably his greatest innings—that tilted the scales irreversibly in Australia’s favour. 

South Africa, a fortress at home since their return to international cricket in 1992, had remained unbeaten in six home series. But here, against an Australian side that began and ended with resilience, they faltered when it mattered most. 

A Pitch for Pacemen and a Game of Patience 

Taylor, given the conditions, had no hesitation in bowling first. The deck, green and lively, offered little comfort for batsmen, a stage set for fast bowling supremacy. Australia, unchanged from the previous Test, banked on the potency of their attack. South Africa, on the other hand, made bold alterations—dropping Hudson, Rhodes, and Klusener in favor of Bacher, Gibbs, and the returning McMillan. The gamble, however, left three inexperienced batsmen in their top six, an imbalance that Jason Gillespie exploited with ruthless precision. 

Gillespie, at full throttle, delivered his first five-wicket haul for Australia, extracting disconcerting movement while maintaining impeccable lines. South Africa crumbled to 95 for seven, seemingly undone before their innings had even begun. Yet, fortune played its part. Richardson, the last recognized batsman, was given not out before scoring despite vehement Australian appeals for a catch behind. He capitalized on his reprieve, forging an invaluable 85-run partnership with McMillan. Their resistance lifted South Africa to 209—a total that, given the conditions, proved formidable. 

With Pollock tearing a hamstring, the South African pace battery was weakened, but the home side found inspiration elsewhere. Their bowlers maximized the pitch’s venom, exposing the frailties of Australia’s batting. The tourists struggled through the first session, losing only three wickets, but never settled. The turning point arrived with Bacher’s sharp run-out of Elliott for 23—the highest score in an innings that never found a rhythm. It triggered a spectacular collapse: seven wickets for 44 runs. Though Donald bowled with pace and menace, his efforts yielded only one victim, an anomaly in a game where his every delivery seemed capable of dismantling stumps. 

The Australians, frustrated by unfamiliar ground conditions, raised concerns about the absence of hessian mats beneath the covers—standard practice in the First Test—to mitigate overnight moisture. ICC referee Raman Subba Row found no fault with the ground staff but later recommended uniform covering regulations. 

The Collapse That Opened the Door 

South Africa, now in a position of dominance, pushed their lead to 184. With improved batting conditions, they appeared poised to bat Australia out of the contest. But the third day unveiled a self-inflicted implosion. A cascade of reckless dismissals—ten wickets lost for just 85 runs—left the door ajar for Australia. The unravelling began with Bacher, once the architect of a brilliant run-out in the first innings, now playing the villain by inadvertently running out his own partner, Kallis. It set a tone of ill-discipline, with five more batsmen perishing to rash strokes. 

Cronje alone provided resistance, his 21-over vigil a study in patience before he too fell to a Bevan googly. Bevan and Warne combined to finish the innings, setting Australia a daunting yet attainable target: 270. Another 40 or 50 runs would have put the chase beyond reach, but South Africa had squandered their advantage. 

Mark Waugh’s Finest Hour 

The target was not insurmountable, but it required an innings of rare distinction. Mark Waugh delivered exactly that. In a match governed by fluctuating momentum, his knock was the one true constant. Arriving at the crease in turmoil—Australia reeling at 30 for two—he played with a blend of stern resolve and effortless grace. Taylor failed again, and Hayden endured a comical exit, colliding with Elliott as Cronje, sharp as ever, took advantage of the confusion to dismantle the stumps at the non-striker’s end. 

Yet, as the day wore on, Waugh imposed himself. His innings was a study in composure, punctuated by a single six and seventeen exquisitely timed fours. By the close, he had brought Australia within sight of history, reaching his fifty while his brother, Steve, provided characteristic steel at the other end. At 145 for three, the tourists held the advantage, but the battle was far from over. 

Kallis, showing maturity beyond his years, removed Steve early on the final morning, and when Adams bowled Blewett, South Africa sensed an opening at 192 for five. The atmosphere turned electric, the crowd—though not large—was at fever pitch. Waugh remained the immovable figure at one end, but he was running out of partners. Bevan arrived to lend support, pushing Australia closer, but with just 12 needed, calamity struck. 

Kallis removed Waugh, and almost immediately, Cronje dismissed Bevan. When Warne followed, South Africa had clawed their way back once more. Two wickets remained, five runs still required. Tension gripped the ground. 

Ian Healy, unperturbed by the pressure, refused to engage in a calculated, single-seeking approach. Instead, he seized the moment with bravado, launching Cronje high over long leg for six, sealing one of Australia’s most dramatic victories. 

A Test for the Ages 

This was a Test that defied logic—a match where fortune swung wildly, where collapses and counterattacks dictated the rhythm, and where, ultimately, Mark Waugh’s masterclass eclipsed all else. In an era dominated by attritional cricket, his innings stood out as a masterpiece of elegance under duress. 

For South Africa, the loss was more than just the end of a series; it was the first home series defeat since their readmission to Test cricket—a moment of reckoning. Yet, in defeat, they had provided a spectacle that embodied the raw, unpredictable beauty of Test cricket. 

For Australia, it was vindication. They had endured, adapted, and, when it mattered most, found the brilliance needed to triumph. The record books would mark it as a 2-1 series victory, but those who witnessed it knew it was much more—a battle of spirit, skill, and the enduring magic of the longest format.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

 

Pakistan Salvage Pride as Inzamam Shines in Karachi

Pakistan's final stand in the three-match series against Sri Lanka was less a routine consolation victory and more a reassertion of dominance at Karachi’s National Stadium, a fortress that remained unbreached for 34 Tests. The hosts, teetering on the edge of a historic whitewash on home soil, found redemption inside four days, thanks to the resilience of their batting mainstay, Inzamam-ul-Haq, and a rejuvenated fast-bowling attack.

For captain Moin Khan, the victory was a personal triumph. Initially drafted as a stand-in for the injured Saeed Anwar, Moin found himself at the helm permanently when Anwar relinquished leadership. It was a twist of fate that mirrored the volatility of Pakistan’s team selection, which, by the final Test, had seen four different opening partnerships in the series. Shahid Afridi, promoted from the middle order at Peshawar, was paired with the debutant Naved Ashraf, while Ijaz Ahmed replaced the discarded Aamir Sohail. Pakistan’s bowling strategy, too, reflected a shift in philosophy—off-spinner Arshad Khan was sidelined in favor of a four-man pace attack, led by the returning Mohammad Akram and the 18-year-old newcomer Irfan Fazil.

Sri Lanka, riding high after two dominant victories, made just a single forced change, bringing in de Saram for the injured Aravinda de Silva. Yet, for the first time in the series, their batting faltered, succumbing to a determined Pakistani effort.

The Inzamam Masterclass

If there was one defining figure in Pakistan’s resurgence, it was Inzamam-ul-Haq. In both innings, he stood tall amid the turbulence, playing with a composure that belied the psychological pressure of a looming clean sweep.

The first day saw Pakistan lose Afridi early, despite his typically audacious 74 off 92 balls—a flurry of boundaries that provided a brisk start but lacked the substance to anchor the innings. As wickets tumbled, Inzamam dug in, crafting a watchful 86 over four hours. His innings ended in an unfortunate run-out, but not before he ensured Pakistan eked out a competitive total. Shoaib Akhtar, with a cameo of 50 runs in partnership with Inzamam, played his role in stabilizing the innings.

Sri Lanka, who had dictated terms in the previous two Tests, now found themselves in unfamiliar territory. For the first time in the series, they conceded a first-innings lead—a crucial psychological shift that emboldened the home side.

If Inzamam’s first innings was a lesson in patience, his second was an exhibition of authority. On the third day, he unfurled his ninth Test century, a majestic 138 compiled over five and a half hours, studded with 17 fours and a towering six off Muttiah Muralitharan. Dropped on 56, he reached a personal milestone of 4,000 Test runs—becoming only the fifth Pakistani to do so. But his innings was not without friction; Sri Lanka’s close fielders, sensing his growing dominance, resorted to persistent sledging, prompting him to formally complain to umpire Russell Tiffin. Yet, their words failed to shake his concentration. Inzamam, the son of an Islamic saint, simply let his bat respond.

A Bowling Revival and Sri Lanka’s Collapse

With a daunting 451-run target to chase, Sri Lanka began their second innings with a challenge bordering on the improbable. Pakistan’s bowlers, scenting blood, made early inroads, reducing the visitors to five wickets down within 22 overs. Any hopes of resistance were fleeting; Pushpakumara’s spirited 44 off 45 balls added a veneer of respectability, but the collapse was inevitable. Wickremasinghe, recording a second pair in the match, found himself in an unenviable club of batsmen with five ducks in a series—a footnote to Pakistan’s resurgent performance.

Despite the brilliance of Muralitharan—who claimed eight wickets in the match and became the first Sri Lankan to reach 250 Test scalps—the visitors' batting unit failed to rise to the occasion. Their dominance in the series had been comprehensive, but on this occasion, it was Pakistan who dictated terms.

A Victory Beyond the Scorecard

Pakistan’s triumph in Karachi was not merely a statistical footnote; it was a moment of catharsis. For Moin Khan, it marked a successful initiation into full-time captaincy. For Inzamam, it was a reaffirmation of his stature as the backbone of Pakistan’s middle order. For the young Irfan Fazil, it was an introduction to the pressures of Test cricket.

Above all, it was a reminder that Pakistan, despite their volatility, remained a team capable of summoning brilliance when pushed against the wall.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar