Cricket in the Shadow of Upheaval: Tumultuous Times in Bangladesh During Pakistan Era

 

The domestic cricket season in Pakistan traditionally unfolds during the cooler autumn and winter months, offering a respite from the searing summer heat. However, the 1970/71 cricket season was anything but ordinary, unfolding against the backdrop of political upheaval that would forever alter the nation's trajectory. As the nation grappled with epoch-making events, cricket too underwent profound changes, reflecting the turbulent winds of the time. 

Politics Meets Cricket: A Nation at a Crossroads

In December 1970, Pakistan held its first national and provincial elections based on universal adult suffrage, heralding a new era of political accountability. Yet, the aftermath of these elections unleashed a tempest of discontent, particularly in East Pakistan, where the political and cultural divide between the two wings of the country reached a breaking point. Amid this turmoil, cricket, often seen as a unifying force, became a stage where the broader currents of change played out. 

The Ayub Trophy, a staple of Pakistan’s cricketing calendar, was rebranded as the BCCP Trophy under the administration of a new government in Islamabad. Cricket tournaments, like the inaugural National Under-19 Championship, were introduced, fostering talent from both wings of the country. Divided into East and West Zones, this competition mirrored the duality of a nation already straining under its internal divisions. 

East Pakistan’s Moment in the Sun

In East Pakistan, the National Under-19 Championship showcased Dhaka as the hub of cricketing activity. The East Zone’s final was a dramatic affair, with the East Pakistan Sports Federation Under-19 side, led by a young Raqibul Hasan, defeating the Dhaka Education Board team. Tanvir Mazhar Tanna’s extraordinary all-round performance—107 runs and 8 wickets—underscored the talent brewing in the region. 

The national final, hosted in Dhaka, saw East Pakistan's champions take on Lahore’s formidable Under-19 side, captained by Wasim Raja and featuring future luminaries like Imran Khan. Lahore's batting prowess, highlighted by centuries from Afzal Masood and Imran Khan, overwhelmed the East Pakistan team, handing Lahore victory based on a commanding first-innings lead. While this marked a significant moment for cricket in East Pakistan, it also underscored the stark disparity between the two regions, both in cricket and beyond. 

The BCCP Trophy and East Pakistan’s Struggles

In the senior BCCP Trophy, East Pakistan fielded two teams: East Pakistan Whites and Greens. The Whites, representing the more seasoned players, managed a respectable performance against Dhaka University, with young opener Rauf Ansari impressive with scores of 74 and an unbeaten 150. Yet, when pitted against the powerhouse PIA team, boasting Test stalwarts like Zaheer Abbas and Mohammad Ilyas, both East Pakistani teams crumbled under the weight of superior opposition. 

The disparity in cricketing infrastructure and talent between East and West Pakistan was glaring. While West Pakistan fielded teams brimming with international experience, many players from East Pakistan found their solitary brush with first-class cricket in these matches. 

An International Match Turns into a Political Flashpoint

February 1971 brought an international XI led by Mickey Stewart to Pakistan. The second “Test” of the tour, staged in Dhaka, held special significance as it featured two East Pakistan-born cricketers in the Pakistan lineup—Raqibul Hasan and Tanvir Mazhar Tanna. For the Dhaka crowd, Raqibul, a symbol of East Pakistan’s cricketing aspirations, was a focal point. 

As Raqib walked out to bat, he carried a subtle yet defiant message: a sticker on his Gray-Nicolls bat declaring freedom for Bangladesh. The thunderous protest from the Bengali crowd underscored the rising tide of Bengali nationalism. Sadly, Raqib’s innings was short-lived, and Pakistan’s batting faltered against a disciplined international attack. 

The match, however, was overshadowed by an announcement that sent shockwaves through the stadium. President Yahya Khan had postponed the inaugural session of Pakistan’s National Assembly, triggering widespread outrage in Dhaka. Protesters stormed the stadium, setting fire to marquees and forcing the abandonment of the match. The chaos that engulfed Dhaka marked a grim turning point for the nation and its cricket. 

The Curtain Falls on East Pakistani Cricket

The players, trapped in the stadium amid the unrest, were eventually escorted to safety. For the Pakistani team, the journey out of Dhaka was fraught with danger and uncertainty, reflecting the larger collapse of order in the region. As they departed, Raqibul Hasan’s poignant farewell to Zaheer Abbas—“The next time I visit Karachi or Lahore, I might have to come with a new passport”—resonated as a haunting prophecy. 

Within weeks, East Pakistan descended into violence and chaos, culminating in the Liberation War and the eventual emergence of Bangladesh as an independent nation. The events of the 1970/71 cricket season, while seemingly peripheral, mirrored the fractures within the country. For East Pakistan, this was not just the end of a cricketing chapter but the prelude to a new national identity. 

Legacy of a Divided Season

The 1970/71 cricket season serves as a poignant reminder of the intersection between sport and society. Cricket in Pakistan, once seen as a unifying force, became a microcosm of the divisions that tore the nation apart. The talent and potential of East Pakistani cricketers like Raqibul Hasan and Tanvir Mazhar Tanna highlighted what might have been, while the dominance of West Pakistan teams underscored the structural inequalities that defined the era. 

In retrospect, the cricketing contests of that fateful season were more than games; they were a reflection of a nation on the brink of transformation. As the curtain fell on cricket in East Pakistan, it marked not just the end of an era but the dawn of a new chapter in the region’s history.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The Maverick Aravinda de Silva in the 1996 World Cup Final: A Triumph of Grit and Genius

On March 17, 1996, Sri Lanka found themselves on cricket's grandest stage, facing the indomitable Australians in the World Cup final. It was a tale of ambition, resilience, and poetic justice, scripted under the leadership of Arjuna Ranatunga. The build-up to the final had been fraught with tension. Australia’s refusal to play their group match in Colombo, citing security concerns after a terrorist attack, had fueled Ranatunga's resolve. "We want the Australians in the final," he had declared. In Lahore, under the cool night skies in Pakistan’s first day-night ODI, Ranatunga’s wish was granted.

Opting to bowl first, Sri Lanka banked on the conditions to assist their seamers and on their proven ability to chase. Yet, the initial execution faltered. Chaminda Vaas, Sri Lanka’s spearhead, struggled with length, pitching too short and allowing Australia to race to 137 for 1 by the 27th over. The Australians, led by their captain Mark Taylor and a young Ricky Ponting, seemed destined to post an imposing total.

The Master with the Ball

Enter Aravinda de Silva, the architect of one of cricket's most defining performances. De Silva's impact was immediate and multifaceted. First, he ended the flourishing second-wicket partnership by inducing Taylor into a mistimed sweep. Then, with a delivery that exemplified precision, he bowled Ponting, who misjudged a cut shot. In a five-over spell that conceded just 19 runs, de Silva turned the tide. Returning later, he dismissed Ian Healy and held vital catches to remove Steve Waugh and Stuart Law. Australia's innings, which once promised dominance, stuttered to 241 for 7—a total respectable but far from invincible.

The Master with the Bat 

Sri Lanka’s reply began on a precarious note. Their explosive openers, Sanath Jayasuriya and Romesh Kaluwitharana, fell cheaply, leaving the team vulnerable at 23 for 2. Yet, Australia, renowned for their ruthlessness, failed to capitalize. Dew settled on the outfield, complicating matters for their spinners. Shane Warne, the tournament's talisman, and Mark Waugh found the damp ball difficult to grip, while the fielders squandered opportunities. Stuart Law’s drop of Asanka Gurusinha at deep midwicket on 53 epitomized Australia’s unraveling.

Gurusinha, emboldened by his reprieve, took the attack to Warne, dispatching him for a four and a six off successive deliveries. His partnership with de Silva was a masterclass in counterattacking cricket. De Silva, in particular, was a picture of composure and elegance. From the moment he drove his first ball to long-on for three, he maintained an unrelenting rhythm. His innings, a blend of calculated aggression and finesse, was a lesson in adaptability.

When Gurusinha departed, Ranatunga stepped in to provide the finishing touch. Together with de Silva, he ensured there were no late jitters. The pair methodically dismantled the target, with de Silva’s unbeaten century serving as the cornerstone of Sri Lanka’s chase. Fittingly, the winning runs came in the 47th over, making Sri Lanka the first team to successfully chase in a World Cup final.

De Silva’s 107 not out, a knock of unparalleled grace and intelligence, joined the ranks of Clive Lloyd’s and Viv Richards’ centuries in World Cup finals. But this innings was unique, not just for its technical brilliance but for its symbolic significance. It embodied the spirit of a team that had defied expectations, overcome adversity, and claimed their rightful place in history.

The 1996 World Cup final was more than a cricket match. It was a narrative of underdogs rising, a vindication of belief, and a celebration of cricket’s ability to inspire. Sri Lanka, led by their fearless captain and their talismanic all-rounder, had not just won a trophy—they had etched a legacy.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Sri Lanka’s Moment of Glory: An Analytical Reflection on the 1996 Cricket World Cup Final

The 1996 Cricket World Cup final was not merely a sporting event; it was a narrative steeped in defiance, redemption, and a nation’s assertion of its cricketing identity. The tension leading up to the clash between Sri Lanka and Australia at Lahore’s Gaddafi Stadium was palpable, underscored by political undertones and the raw emotions of a country that had been spurned earlier in the tournament.

Australia and the West Indies’ refusal to play in Colombo during the group stage, citing security concerns, left Sri Lanka feeling slighted and betrayed. This bitterness was echoed by Sri Lanka’s Information Minister, Dharmasiri Senanayake, who viewed Australia’s semi-final victory over the West Indies as an opportunity for Sri Lanka to "teach a lesson" to the Australians in the final. The needle between the two teams was unmistakable, and the final became a stage for Sri Lanka to assert both their cricketing prowess and their national pride.

At the heart of Sri Lanka’s campaign was their indomitable captain, Arjuna Ranatunga, a figure whose influence extended far beyond the boundary ropes. Ranatunga’s leadership was reminiscent of Clive Lloyd’s in the West Indies’ golden era. Like Lloyd, Ranatunga was a tactician and a statesman, commanding respect from his team while fearlessly challenging cricket’s establishment. His defiance of Australian umpires over the controversial no-balling of Muttiah Muralitharan was emblematic of his refusal to be cowed by cricket’s traditional powers.

Ranatunga’s confrontational style was met with disdain in the Australian camp. Ian Chappell recounted an incident where Shane Warne, visibly irked by Ranatunga’s pre-match comments, referred to him with characteristic bluntness. Ranatunga had dismissed Warne as a "media myth," a provocation that set the tone for a final brimming with intensity.

The Sri Lankan team, arriving in Lahore, was greeted with a hero’s welcome. Pakistan, still smarting from their quarter-final loss to India, found solace in Sri Lanka’s subsequent victory over their arch-rivals in the semi-final. The warm reception was a testament to the solidarity of subcontinental cricketing nations, united in their desire to see Sri Lanka succeed against the Australians.

Australia’s Inning: A Promising Start Undone by Spin

Australia, electing to bat, began confidently. Mark Taylor and Ricky Ponting stitched together a vital partnership of 101 runs, employing classical techniques to counter Sri Lanka’s opening bowlers, Chaminda Vaas and Pramodya Wickramasinghe. Taylor, in particular, looked poised for a rare century, dominating the bowling with authoritative pulls and drives. However, his dismissal for 74 off Aravinda de Silva’s bowling marked a turning point.

The pitch, initially benign, began to favour spin as the innings progressed. Aravinda, showcasing his all-round brilliance, dismissed Ponting and later accounted for Ian Healy, while Muralitharan’s guile left Shane Warne flummoxed. Australia’s middle order crumbled under the pressure, managing a mere 44 runs between overs 25 and 40. Michael Bevan’s late resistance ensured a respectable total of 241, but the innings lacked the momentum needed to challenge Sri Lanka’s robust batting lineup.

Sri Lanka’s Chase: Aravinda’s Masterpiece

Sri Lanka’s reply began disastrously, with their explosive openers, Sanath Jayasuriya and Romesh Kaluwitharana, falling cheaply. At 23 for 2, the chase seemed precarious. Enter Aravinda de Silva, whose innings would become the stuff of legend.

Aravinda, already a proven match-winner in the tournament, exuded confidence from the outset. His footwork against spin was impeccable, and his stroke play was a masterclass in precision and timing. He dismantled Shane Warne with clinical ease, rendering the Australian leg-spinner ineffective. Warne’s figures of 0 for 58 in 10 overs were a testament to Aravinda’s dominance.

Partnering with Asanka Gurusinha, Aravinda added 125 runs, stabilizing the innings and putting Sri Lanka firmly in control. Gurusinha, despite being dropped thrice, played a crucial supporting role with a gritty 65. After Gurusinha’s departure, Ranatunga joined Aravinda to finish the job. The two veterans, embodying Sri Lanka’s cricketing ethos, added an unbeaten 97 runs to seal a historic victory.

Aravinda’s unbeaten 107, coupled with his contributions with the ball and in the field, earned him the Man of the Match award. Ranatunga’s unbeaten 47 provided the perfect finishing touch, as Sri Lanka chased down the target with consummate ease.

A Triumph Beyond Cricket

March 17, 1996, marked the culmination of Sri Lanka’s transformation from cricketing minnows to world champions. It was a victory that transcended the sport, symbolizing resilience, unity, and the breaking of colonial-era hierarchies in cricket.

Ranatunga’s men not only won the World Cup but also redefined the way the game was played, with their aggressive batting strategy and fearless approach. Their triumph paved the way for future successes, as evidenced by their appearances in subsequent World Cup finals.

The 1996 final was more than a match; it was a moment of reckoning, a declaration that Sri Lanka had arrived on the world stage, not as underdogs, but as champions.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Aravinda de Silva Masterclass at Eden Gardens 1996: Sri Lankan Demi God with the Willow

In the annals of cricketing history, the 1996 World Cup semifinal between India and Sri Lanka at Eden Gardens stands as a poignant blend of brilliance and heartbreak. Against the backdrop of a tournament that had already showcased Sri Lanka’s audacious new approach to ODI cricket, the stage was set for an unforgettable encounter. India, buoyed by their passionate home crowd, sought to counter the fearless brand of cricket that Sri Lanka had embodied throughout the competition.

The match carried the weight of expectations, heightened by memories of the league game in Delhi where Sri Lanka’s explosive openers, Sanath Jayasuriya and Romesh Kaluwitharana, had dismantled India’s bowling with a breathtaking assault. Though their overall tournament statistics revealed a more modest contribution—Kaluwitharana, for instance, averaged just 12.16—their impact in key moments had left an indelible mark. It was this specter of aggression that shaped Mohammad Azharuddin’s decision to bowl first.

What followed was a dramatic opening act that silenced the Eden Gardens crowd. Javagal Srinath, India’s spearhead, removed both tormentors within the first four deliveries, each playing an identical slash to third man. The early breakthroughs seemed to tilt the scales in India’s favor. But cricket, as ever, thrives on unpredictability.

In the midst of chaos, Aravinda de Silva emerged, wielding his bat with the elegance of an artist and the precision of a surgeon. His innings was a masterclass in timing and placement, a display of batsmanship so pure that it transcended the occasion. De Silva’s 32-ball fifty, adorned with 11 boundaries, was a symphony of cricketing strokes. There was no brute force, no frenzy—only the serenity of a craftsman at work.

Christopher Martin-Jenkins, struck by the ethereal quality of de Silva’s batting, drew parallels to Neville Cardus’s description of Reggie Spooner: "He uses the bat as a lady might use her fan." De Silva’s effortless drives between cover and extra cover rendered fielders mere spectators, his dominance so absolute that Sri Lanka maintained a scoring rate of nearly seven an over despite Asanka Gurusinha’s struggle at the other end.

Yet, as suddenly as it began, de Silva’s innings ended. On the stroke of the 15th over, an inside edge off Anil Kumble clattered into his stumps, leaving Sri Lanka at 85 for 4. The Eden Gardens erupted in relief, but the damage had been done. De Silva’s genius had disrupted India’s rhythm, leaving them stunned and vulnerable.

The rest of the Sri Lankan innings was a testament to their resilience. Roshan Mahanama, Arjuna Ranatunga, and Hashan Tillakaratne batted with composure, navigating the deteriorating pitch to guide their team to a competitive 251. It was a total that, in the context of the match, proved monumental.

India’s chase began with promise but soon descended into chaos. A fast-deteriorating pitch turned into a minefield, and Sri Lanka’s spinners exploited it mercilessly. What began as a steady pursuit unraveled spectacularly. India lost seven wickets for 22 runs, collapsing to 120 for 8.

The Eden Gardens faithful, unaccustomed to such humiliation, vented their frustration in a manner that would mar the game’s legacy. Bottles rained onto the field, seats were set ablaze, and the atmosphere turned hostile. The players, helpless in the face of the crowd’s fury, retreated to the pavilion. Clive Lloyd, the match referee, had no choice but to award the game to Sri Lanka, marking one of the darkest moments in Indian cricket.

This semifnal was more than just a cricket match. It was a microcosm of sport’s unpredictability, showcasing the sublime heights of individual brilliance and the depths of collective despair. Aravinda de Silva’s innings remains etched in memory as a beacon of artistry, while India’s collapse and the crowd’s reaction serve as reminders of the volatile emotions cricket can evoke. For Sri Lanka, it was a step closer to glory; for India, a bitter lesson in resilience and grace under pressure.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Redemption Under the Lights: Real Madrid’s Return to the Quarterfinals

For a club steeped in the lore of European football, the UEFA Champions League is not merely a tournament—it is a stage where legends are made, where history is written in the bold strokes of triumph. Yet, for the past two seasons, Real Madrid’s campaign had ended prematurely in the Round of 16, leaving behind echoes of disappointment. This time, under the steady hand of Zinedine Zidane, Los Blancos navigated the turbulent waters of expectation to emerge victorious, dispatching Atalanta 3-1 on a windy night at the Alfredo Di Stéfano Stadium. 

The aggregate score of 4-1 signalled more than just progression; it marked a resurgence, a return to form for the 13-time European champions. It was a night where youth and experience combined to produce a performance that was as much about resilience as it was about brilliance. 

The Tactical Gambit: Zidane’s Calculated Risk

Zidane’s decision to deploy a three-centre-back system, trialled briefly against Elche, proved to be a masterstroke. With Nacho Fernández excelling in his dual role as a defensive anchor and attacking outlet, the formation allowed Real Madrid to regain their defensive solidity while exploiting Atalanta’s vulnerabilities on the flanks. 

In midfield, the evergreen Luka Modrić and Toni Kroos provided a masterclass in control and creativity. Modrić, in particular, was the heartbeat of the team, orchestrating play with an elegance that belied his years. His anticipation and quick thinking turned Marco Sportiello’s error into an assist for Karim Benzema, setting the tone for the night. 

Vinícius Júnior: The Catalyst

Zidane’s faith in Vinícius Júnior was vindicated as the Brazilian winger delivered a performance that silenced his critics. While he may not have found the net, his pace and dribbling stretched Atalanta’s defence to breaking point. His relentless runs and ability to carve through defenders created spaces and opportunities, exemplified by the penalty he earned after a dazzling solo effort. 

Vinícius’s contribution underscored an often-overlooked aspect of football: the impact of creativity and chaos. In a game increasingly dominated by numbers, his artistry reminded us that not all value can be measured in goals. 

The Leadership of Ramos and the Reliability of Benzema

Sergio Ramos, the talismanic captain, was once again pivotal. His composure from the penalty spot—scoring his 20th consecutive penalty for Madrid—extended the lead and effectively ended Atalanta’s hopes. Ramos’s influence extended beyond the scoresheet, providing the leadership and organization that steadied the team during moments of pressure. 

Meanwhile, Karim Benzema continued his prolific form, demonstrating why he remains one of Europe’s most reliable forwards. His goal, a clinical finish after Modrić’s interception, was his 21st of the season and placed him just one shy of Raúl’s tally of 71 Champions League goals. 

Atalanta’s Flickering Flame

Atalanta, known for their attacking flair, showed glimpses of their potential but were ultimately outclassed. Luis Muriel’s free-kick was a moment of brilliance, but it arrived too late to alter the course of the tie. Duván Zapata and Robin Gosens had their chances, but the Belgian wall, Thibaut Courtois, stood firm. 

A Night of Redemption

Real Madrid’s performance was not without its nervy moments. The opening exchanges saw Atalanta threaten, with Madrid’s defense appearing vulnerable. But as the game progressed, the Spanish giants found their rhythm, asserting their dominance with a blend of tactical discipline and individual brilliance. 

Marco Asensio’s late goal sealed the victory, ensuring the night ended on a high note. It was a fitting conclusion to a match that symbolized Madrid’s enduring spirit and their ability to rise to the occasion when it matters most. 

Looking Ahead

The victory was not just a step forward in the tournament but a statement of intent. Zidane’s second stint at the helm has been marked by challenges, yet his ability to adapt and inspire remains undiminished. The blend of youth and experience in this Madrid side offers hope for the future, while the presence of stalwarts like Modrić, Kroos, Ramos, and Benzema ensures a foundation of excellence. 

As Los Blancos march into the quarterfinals, the ghosts of past disappointments are left behind. This is a team in transition, yet one that refuses to relinquish its place among Europe’s elite. For Zidane and his men, the journey continues, and with it, the promise of more nights like this—nights where legends are reborn, and history is made anew. 

  Thank You

Faisal Caesar