Four years on from the firestorm of 2008, India returned to Perth again 2-0 down—but the air this time was free of rancour. Gone was the acrimony of Sydney’s contentious Test; gone, too, the siege mentality that had bound India into defiant resistance and historic victory in that charged series. In 2012, there was no umbrage, no sense of injustice to unite the visitors. Australia, too, had shed their bitterness. What remained was the cricket—raw, unrelenting, and decisive.
Beneath the
burnished skies of Western Australia, the WACA pitch stood firm, hard and true,
a fast bowler’s dream and a batsman’s reckoning. Here, the narrative was never
destined to be subtle. Clarke, embracing the hostility of Perth’s bounce,
elected to field—backing a pace quartet that had both variation and venom: the
revitalised Hilfenhaus, the grizzled Harris, the fuller, fiercer Siddle, and
the angular, intriguing left-armer Starc.
India’s
response to the pitch was pragmatic but ultimately fruitless—they too packed
their side with seam, handing a debut to Vinay Kumar and sacrificing Ashwin’s
spin. But their arsenal was no match for the Australian surge. India's first
innings, a ragged 161, barely resisted. Kohli and Laxman flickered, but nothing
held. And with Sharma’s dismissal, Australia strode in with two full days
ahead—and a storm waiting on the horizon.
The Warner Tempest: A Century in Frenzied Verse
David
Warner's innings was not so much played as detonated. In 69 balls—a blur of
aggression, clarity, and defiance—he compiled a century that redefined what an
opener could be in the longest format. He did not negotiate the new ball; he
pummelled it. Hook, jab, upper-cut—each stroke seemed forged in the crucible of
T20 instinct but transposed seamlessly into the red-ball theatre.
Warner’s
180 from 159 balls, littered with 20 fours and five sixes, was less an innings
than a proclamation. Test orthodoxy held no power over him. Against Kumar and
Sharma, he lifted sixes over long-on and drove Zaheer high into the John
Inverarity Stand—each stroke a poem in rebellion against cricket’s conservative
guardianship.
At the
other end, Ed Cowan played the straight man in this double act, his 74 a study
in application and contrast. His watchful vigil allowed Warner the oxygen to
combust freely. Together they forged an opening stand of 214—Australia’s
blazing overture to a match that would leave India scorched.
Collapse and the Mirage of Resistance
Yet
Warner’s dismissal, to a mishit caught at long-on, revealed Australia’s fragility
beneath the spectacle. From 214 without loss, they crumbled to 369 all
out—losing 10 wickets for 155. The rest of the batting proved mortal. India’s
reply, already 208 adrift, dissolved even more pitifully. Dravid scratched out
a stay, Kohli fought with promise, but the tail collapsed with theatrical
finality—36 runs from the last six wickets, the final four contributing nothing
at all.
Hilfenhaus,
reborn with rhythm and bite, claimed a career-best match haul of 8 for 97. Once
mocked for his ineffectual movement in the Ashes, he now led an attack that had
methodically dismantled India six innings in a row. The wreckage was complete
before lunch on the third day. Australia had reclaimed the Border-Gavaskar
Trophy. The sun dipped behind the Swan River. India’s golden generation, once
so feared, now looked like an echo.
Clarke's Measured March and Australia’s
Awakening
In the
blaze of Warner's fury and the disintegration of India’s order, a subtler but
more profound narrative was taking shape. Michael Clarke, now firmly entrenched
as leader, presided over the win with the poise of a man who had learned from
collapse—be it Cape Town’s 47 all out or Hobart’s surrender to New Zealand.
These were not scars; they were scriptures. He had read them well.
Under
Clarke and coach Mickey Arthur, Australia had begun to chart a new path—one
that wasn’t just about survival post-Warne-McGrath but about belief in a new
structure, a new tone. Their victories—1-0 in Sri Lanka, a draw in South
Africa, and now this thumping of India—had restored rhythm, even if they had
yet to recover the symphony of dominance.
The
triumphs of the summer were dazzling. Clarke’s own triple-century in Sydney had
been regal; Ponting's renaissance century dignified; Warner's was volcanic.
Cowan offered solidity, and the bowling cartel, rotated with precision, throttled
India’s once-fabled batting. Australia had bowled India out six times for an
average of just 229, and between Cowan's dismissal in Sydney and Cowan’s again
in Perth, India had taken just 1 wicket for 836 runs.
Still,
Clarke was wary. “We haven’t achieved much yet,” he warned. His humility wasn’t an affectation—it was strategic. Australia had slipped down the ICC ladder to
fourth. Regaining the No. 1 Test ranking would not be a matter of isolated
brilliance. The next real milestone was still a year away: the 2013 Ashes.
Of Ghosts, Gaps, and Grit Ahead
For now,
there were blemishes to address. Shaun Marsh, with 14 runs in the entire
series, seemed out of place amidst Australia's run-glut. His place was in
jeopardy with Watson’s return looming. Brad Haddin, too, had failed to make his
presence felt, his form shadowed by missed chances and silence at the crease.
In a losing side, these would be open wounds. In a winning one, they were
veiled bruises—visible, but not yet crippling.
Australia
will almost certainly win the series 4-0 or 3-0—or, in some act of Indian
resistance, 3-1. But the real questions are longer term: Can this team conquer
England? Can this group evolve from promise to power?
The signs
are promising: Warner, Pattinson, Cummins, a reborn Hilfenhaus, the tireless
Siddle—each represents a brushstroke in Clarke’s new portrait of an Australian
resurgence. But the journey is long. The ghosts of recent failures linger.
South Africa, England—these are not India, crumbling on foreign soil.
And yet, as
Clarke stood in the late Perth light, he might have sensed what few dared to
say aloud: this was not just a victory, but a beginning. Australia were no
longer rebuilding. They were rising.
Thank You
Faisal Caesar
No comments:
Post a Comment