Friday, November 9, 2012

Was Akram Khan and Co victimized by nepotism?



The Caribbean team are in town to play a Test series against us. This Caribbean side are a different cattle of fish this time around. Recent success against the Kiwis and victory in the World T20 has made them confident, they are a dynamic bunch of individuals who are destined to give the opposition tougher times.  In the batting they have the dash and flair while in the bowling sector they possess immense guile and variation. Undoubtedly, the Tigers, who will be playing Test cricket after a year, are up to face some gritty Calypso music.

To face the Calypso music the Tigers need a team which will offer dynamism and for which and ideal blend of youth and tried and tested packages are needed. You can’t challenge a team beaming with confidence with dull figures. But sadly, the Bangladeshi selectors opted for dullness.

I am surprised by the omission of Enamul Haque junior. What Enamul need to prove to the selectors is to give his life to prove his worth and get selected in the national squad. What he has not proved? Over the years, Enamul has been a consistent bunny. But sadly, they were not enough to impress the selectors who showed faith upon the out of form Elias Sunny. Perhaps, Elias Sunny’s success in the last series against the West Indies propelled Akram Khan and Co to select Elias Sunny, but why was not Enamul’s last series against the Caribbean in 2009 being considered which was a major success?

A squad should be built upon a player’s recent performance and in that sense Enamul should have been there. Akram Khan defended Enamul’s exclusion with the availability of Shakib and perhaps, he wishes the operation of a right arm off-spinner alongside Shakib. Young gun Sohag Gazi has been included with the plan to aid Shakib, but I don’t mind in operating two left-arm spinners from both the ends. As, the left-arm spinners have been our strength for long and it’s wise to play according to our strength.

If Akram Khan is concerned too much with the experience factor then Shakib’s guile needs the incisiveness and experience of Enamul. But sadly, the selectors didn’t realize this. Again, we can see that tried and tested customer Nazmul Hasan has been omitted and an inexperienced Abul Hasan has been included. Abul’s inclusion has been defended with his ability to bowl with pace. But what is pace if it lacks direction? It’s useless. Nazmul Hasan, at the other hand, has developed enough control over his bowling and in the domestic circuit he has been very productive. If Akram Khan wanted experience then Nazmul Hasan should feature in the Test squad.

Test cricket is a stage where one needs to exhibit courage, intelligence and skill. Many young talents, in the history of Test cricket, have displayed these since their introduction to Test cricket. Shakib and Tamim from Bangladesh has been proving it since their entry in Test cricket. And players like Anamul, Soumaya and Litton Das are well blessed with these qualities. The fans expected their inclusion in the Test side as, at least, they are way better than dull and flop characters like Nazimuddin or Junaid Siddique. Young and gifted players add dynamism to the team but for which a selector is needed to be bold and intelligent to recognize such talents.

By ignoring the exuberance of youth and experience of the tested customers Akram Khan and Co are giving us the impression of lacking the eyes and brain to recognize and utilize talents. Or, should I say they have been victimized by nepotism? Their acts are hinting such.

The only encouraging inclusion has been Sohag Gazi. But he must feature in the XI rather than carrying drinks. 

Thank You
Faisal Caesar

No comments:

Post a Comment