Congratulations to MS Dhoni for nailing the Aussies by a 4-0
margin. Suddenly, the critics have changed their tone; MS Dhoni and coach
Duncan Fletcher aren’t the scapegoats anymore. Though, even a couple of months
ago, people were after Dhoni and Fletcher’s heads. But things have changed now
and India has
successfully come out of the horrors of the shambolic past with a commendable
performance. A gentle breeze is blowing in the Indian camp.
But for the Australians things aren’t looking rosy at all.
After a 4-0 bashing, the Australian cricket are in the mud. It had not been the
Australian unit we are actually used to witness. We all witnessed an Australian
unit which has surrendered meekly. Whereas, traditionally, the Australians are
fighters who never give up till the last minute.
The Aussie batsmen were shaky – too allergic against the
turning ball and in the second innings they continued to fail in the most
ignominious manner. The Australian bowlers were just running and bowl without a
purpose and proper intention while the fielders were less energetic throughout
the Test series. Michael Clarke has been the only batsman to strike gold, but
his own batting consistency weren’t enough to keep his team from sinking.
Again, controversy had haunted this Australian side which is very unusual.
The Australian team in India
lacked passion, purpose, heart and above all - aggression. Yes, this Australian
team doesn’t breathe fire when the battle is tough. This Australian team
doesn’t hunt and don’t feel defeated after digesting heavy defeats. It is
lacking that intimidating factor which has been the part and parcel of
Australian cricket and has been instrumental in setting up many wins in the
past. Even though, at Delhi , we did
notice some aggressive verbal practice from the Australian players but they
didn’t bear enough importance as an ideal balance between mental intimidation
and aggressive cricket remained absent. Australia’s verbal aggression only
indicated of a unit who were literally frustrated with themselves.
They are saying that this touring Australian unit lacks the
experience in touring India
and for which they didn’t click. It sounds like un-Australian. An Australian
doesn’t defend such a way.
When Allan Border toured India
in 1986, it consisted of players who were touring India
for the first time. And those inexperienced but enthusiastic bunch of Aussies
were against the giants of the game. But they didn’t get afraid against the
likes of Gavaskars, Kapils and Shastris and gave that World Champion Indian
team a run for their money. As a matter of fact, that young and inexperienced
Australian side’s body language was energetically aggressive enough to accept
any of the opposition’s challenges. They never bogged down under adversity. Similarly,
Mark Taylor took a low-profile Australian side to the West Indies
in 1995. Taylor didn’t have a great
attack, except Shane Warne to dent the mighty Caribbean
batting. Neither did he have a solid batting line up to face the fury of
Ambrose and Walsh. But in 1995, Australia
ended West Indies ’ unbeaten run in Test cricket. The
mantra was an ideal balance between mental intimidation and aggressive cricket.
The Australian aggression was rekindled under Allan Border
and Bob Simpson in a very crucial period of Australian cricket. With Greg
Chappell, Dennis Lillee and Rod Marsh leaving the scene, Australia
found themselves in the middle of nowhere. Allan Border took over the captaincy
and Bob Simpson was made the coach in a period of time when Australian cricket
had hit the rock bottom. Border and Simpson were not blessed with great talents
but they did have some passionate bunch of individuals who were brought under a
certain work ethics and one of the important ethics was to develop a unique
aggressive nature to dent the opposition’s psyche – an aggression which made a
perfect balance between the body language, words and deeds. A new Australian
era had begun.
The legacy of Allan Border was carried on by Mark Taylor,
Steve Waugh and Ricky Ponting but Michael Clarke is finding it hard to carry on
that legacy. But Michael Clarke is lacking Border’s boldness and flair, Taylor ’s
daring and diplomacy and Steve Waugh’s ruthless razzmatazz. Michael Clarke’s
captaincy and man management skills aren’t shining as brightly as his batting. But
that’s not expected from an Aussie leader.
Being the captain, Michael Clarke must reinstall the
aggression within his men. Like Border and Simpson, Clarke and Mickey Arthur
must sort out a certain work ethic to galvanize his men. Clarke must make his
men understand the value of the Baggy Green cap. Michael Clarke must make his
men an army of ruthless men. Without rekindling the aggressive flair, the
Australian team won’t come back on track. Michael Clarke has to be the messiah
of his team to essay the Renaissance of a ruthless Australian team.
Thank You
Faisal Caesar
No comments:
Post a Comment