The Hyderabad Test didn’t offer any exciting cricket but gifted
us another heavily one sided affair like the Chennai Test match. At Hyderabad,
only one team looked out and out dominant and that had been the home team –
India. They outclassed their guests in all departments to take a dominant 2-0
lead. Surprisingly, the visitors named Australia, who are well known for their never-say-die-spirit,
were a shadow of their glorious past. In India, Australia had always been under
achievers. But in the last decade, since this Border-Gavaskar trophy had become
a mouth-watering stuff, Australia hardly exhibited such sort of spineless
cricket on Indian soil.
Border-Gavaskar trophy has always been one of my most cherished
Test series apart from the Ashes and Indo-Pak clash. With Indo-Pak series being
trapped by political circus and Ashes being too much one sided, the Border-Gavaskar
trophy has been offering some epic encounters for the last twelve years. But I
guess, it is coming to an end. In 2011, we witnessed a one sided Test series down
under with Australia drowning India brutally and at present, India are
repeating the same brutality on their rivals. On both the occasions, we were being
deprived of fighting-displays which has given this Border-Gavaskar a different
dimension in the world cricket.
Being a fan of Australia’s never say die attitude, I always follow
Australian cricket as on any trying and testing circumstances, the Australians
are habituated to put up an inspiring performance to make the contest a close
call. You might see Australia lose but rather than clapping for the winning
team, you will surely stand up and salute the unique Australian fighting
spirit. Surprisingly, we aren’t observing such valiant fighters from Australia
at present.
Which Australian side are we witnessing now?
We are witnessing an Australian unit which is going down
with an embarrassing rapidity. We are witnessing an Australian unit which looks
a perplexed unit when the situation demands a fight back. We are witnessing an
Australian side which has forgotten to carry on the legacy of Border, Taylor,
Chappell and Steve Waugh. Sadly, this Australian side gives up easily and loses
their way when the going gets tough.
Australia did not surface an ideal Test XI at Chennai and
Hyderabad. I just didn’t understand why Australia persisted with Phil Hughes who
has proved his incompetency time and again. By the way, Is the number four
position an ideal slot for Shane Watson? Number four is a very important
position in Test cricket and requires the service of a specialist batsman.
Australia should have built a spin combination with Lyon and
Doherty. Rather than relying on one specialist spinner it would have been
sensible to play two specialist spinners and in between Moises and Maxwell,
Australia should have persisted only with one all-rounder. Australia’s plan to
put India under pressure through sheer pace proved to be a failed mission.
The Australian pace bowlers did try the reverse swing but
what is reverse swing without thunderous pace – It’s nothing but a waste. We
did witness the likes of Siddle and Strac to apply the reverse swing but they
were not thrown at an extreme pace and thus their efforts couldn’t fetch better
results. Hardly, we could witness any wicket-taking balls delivered by them.
The Australian pace bowlers biggest asset, over the years, has been leg-cutters
and off-cutters – pitching them on the back of a length around the corridor of
uncertainty. Reverse swing has never been an Australian weapon to create a
havoc. The Australian pace bowlers were disciplined but never had been there
was aggression with a proper intensity.
Above all, in this crisis situation, the best shot must come
from Michael Clarke. Michael Clarke should bat up the order rather than wasting
himself at number 5. He should bring on a certain resolve in this disorganized
Australian unit like Alastair Cook did for England. Clarke’s bat must prove to
be a fort in Australia’s second innings. Both at Chennai and Hyderabad, it had
been in the second innings where Australia looked at their worst best. On both
the occasions, Michael Clarke’s bat was needed to tame the Indian spinners. Sadly,
Clarke couldn’t be a Cook and Australia lacked a lighthouse to show them the
way.
Thank You
No comments:
Post a Comment