Bangladesh played a Test match on Indian soil for the first
time in their history of Test cricket. Critics and fans expected a fitting
reply from the Tigers in familiar conditions, but in the end, it turned out to
be an easy win for the home team. Whether the Bangladeshi cricket fans and
critics should be satisfied with the performance of the Tigers or not remains a
moot question.
The tea break was postponed. India were one wicket away from
yet another series win under the captaincy of Virat Kohli. Ravichandran Ashwin
dished out a slider which beat Bangladesh’s last man Taskin Ahmed. India
appealed for a leg before wicket. But umpire Marias Erasmus went across to his
partner Joel Wilson to consult and decided to check for a bat-pad catch with
the help of third umpire. The replay showed, there was no contact between bat
and pad and the case of a bat-pad catch was over ruled.
Virat Kohli decided to review again for an lbw and confirmed
the end of Bangladesh’s innings before tea. On a very good batting track, the
visitors ended up the ghost without putting up any brief resistance and lost
the Test by 208 runs.
On the final day of the only Test between India and
Bangladesh at Hyderabad, the visitors were needed to exhibit resolve on a very
good batting track and fight hard to save the Test match. Mushfiqur Rahim and
Mahmudullah Riyad’s 56-run partnership was an inspiring one, but as soon as
Mushfiq’s rush of blood ended his stay at the crease, Bangladesh lost their way
in no time and digested a heavy defeat.
The popular print and
electronic media and celebrities of social media in Bangladesh are trying to
highlight the performance of the Tigers as a satisfactory one. As because, in
both innings, Bangladesh have played more than 100 overs and they were able to
take the game to the fifth day where teams like South Africa, New Zealand and
England failed. Whereas, the tracks on
which South Africa, England and New Zealand were tougher than Hyderabad.
Moreover, there was an epic hundred from Mushfiqur Rahim and
a stubborn resistance from the 19-year old sensation Mehedi Hasan Miraz, which
triggered a wave of satisfaction among the Bangladesh cricket pundits and fans.
But in my opinion, Bangladesh's performance lacked intent
and professionalism.
Failure
of the Bangladeshi top order batsmen on a flat track
The conditions at Hyderabad were similar to Mirpur and Dhaka
and a lot friendlier than New Zealand. It was a flat deck and till the final
day, it remained absolutely perfect for batting. The Hyderabad track neither
offered movement and bounce for the pace bowlers nor turn for the spinners. All
Bangladesh needed to do was exhibit patience and occupy the crease as much as
possible, rather than relying on playing more strokes and fetch runs via
striking boundaries.
In Test cricket, boundary-based batting and over-adventurous
strokes have little value. It’s a pity, even after playing Test cricket for 17
years, Banglades still have not realized this.
In reply to India’s mammoth first innings total, the top
order of the visitors was needed to give Bangladesh a steady start. Sadly, the
top order of Bangladesh succumbed on a flat deck and put enough pressure on the
middle and lower order. Yes, there were some hostile spell of pace bowling from
the likes of Umesh Yadav and Ishant Sharma, but surprisingly, Soumya Sarkar,
Mominul Haque and Mahmudullah Riyad lacked the technique to survive the guile
of Umesh and Co.
Umesh was able to reverse the ball at pace and if you are a
top order batsman, you should have the ability to counter those. The Bangladeshi
batsmen lacked a sound technique while playing against the reverse swing.
Bangladesh did experience playing against some top quality reverse swing
bowling against England at home, but sadly, they didn’t work on their
shortcomings.
Moreover, the tendency to throw away wickets after getting
well set still remains a thorn in the throat for Bangladesh and, it seems, the
Tigers are unable to bury the ghost despite suffering so much for executing
suicidal strokes during the crucial stage of a match. Again; sloppy fielding,
funny reviews and lack of discipline in bowling undid the visitors.
The
fitness factor
Bangladesh failed to keep their energy on the field as the
day progressed. The way Taskin Ahmed and Kamrul Islam were bowling in the first
session of the first day, it ebbed away in the second and remained the same
throughout the Test. Meanwhile, after the first session of play on day 1, the
fielders were seen to struggle while running after the ball and lacked the
energy which is required for a five-day match.
From a fitness point of view, Bangladesh had not been up to the mark.
To survive the strains of a five-day match, maintaining the
fitness is very important. The athleticism and agility of Virat’s men give you
an indication about the importance of fitness in Test cricket. If you get tired
early, it becomes tough to maintain the same level of concentration and urge to
perform in a Test match.
Should
Bangladesh be satisfied with the performance at Hyderabad?
If I consider Bangladesh’s improvement in the last two
years, I don’t think one should not relish such smaller achievements and bask
in a false glory. In the name of so called patriotism, trying to highlight the
‘positives’ is nothing but an attempt to hide the problems which are bigger and
requires rectification.
Bangladesh should not be satisfied only by playing hundred
overs in both innings and surviving five days at Hyderabad, but they need to
sit down and ponder about how to win Test matches and avoid defeats.
Note: This article has been published at Cricketsoccer on 15/02/2017 Should Bangladesh be satisfied?
Thank You
Faisal Caesar
No comments:
Post a Comment