Bangladesh came good when it mattered the most. It was all
about handling the pressure and Bangladesh hung on to an absolute
cliffhanger…..
All was not well in the Bangladesh camp.
The back to back defeats against Afghanistan and India
immediately created a buzz outside the cricket field – a common scenario, which
is always evident whenever the Tigers digest a surrender meekly in two or three
matches in a row.
The media, fans and I started to make a noise about the
sudden inclusion of Imrul Kayes and Soumya Sarkar. The Bangladesh Cricket Board
Boss’s role came under scrutiny. The lack of match winners other than Fabulous
Five of Bangladesh had been discussed like never before. The debate on the poor
first-class structure of Bangladesh gained momentum, yet again.
The off the field matters added extra pressure on the
Tigers, whose fragile batting order and lack of form of some of the players
already put them under immense pressure. And in the crunch game against
Afghanistan, the possibilities of another meek surrender were on the cards when
Shakib Al Hasan and Mushfiqur Rahim left the scene due to a panic attack –
those two run-outs were unacceptable at this level of cricket and from two of
the most experienced campaigners of Bangladesh cricket.
Bangladesh batting was reeling at 87 for 5.
No fear of failure
No one would like to invest faith in the newly-included
Imrul Kayes, who was playing an ODI after 11 months and landed in Abu Dhabi
just a day before the match and on an out of form Mahmudullah Riyad. Kayes was
playing at number 6, a position, which he never relishes to bat and in fact, he
never batted in that position previously. Moreover, he was supposed to bat as
an opener, but Bangladesh decided to gamble with him, which ultimately paid
off. Meanwhile, Mahmudullah’s fragility against the spinners is well known. The
Afghan spinners had the better of him in the last match and his lack of foot
movement makes him an easy target for the spinners.
Well, it was a tough situation and what needed was the
ability to handle the pressure.
The best way to handle the pressure in that situation was to
erase the fear of failure. Whenever the fear of losing gets into you, you
cannot progress further. Mahmudullah and Kayes decided to dominate the Afghan
spinners, especially Rashid Khan.
Now, you can dominate a bowler in two ways: 1. By
counterattacking him and 2. By not giving him wickets. Kayes and Mahmudullah
went for the second option. As Brendon McCullum once said, “One must rein
oneself in under pressure. Instead of going for a big heave when you're not
seeing the ball well and your feet are not moving, take a single to get the
other batsman on strike. Doing that gives you time to settle down and find
form”.
They started to manoeuvre the strike more against the
spinners and the plan was not to give them wickets. Even if they did not score
against them, it would not matter much, but giving them wickets would
automatically allow them to gain the momentum.
In the post-match presser Mahmudullah said, “I think I
wasn't able to apply myself against him previously, but we decided during the
partnership that we won't give him wickets. We wanted to go deep and see it
till the end. We achieved our target”.
Definitely, Kayes and Mahmudullah achieved their target as
their sixth wicket stand helped Bangladesh to post a very competitive total.
Both of them notched-up 36 runs off 48 balls against Rashid and Bangladesh lost
just two wickets for 134 runs in 31 overs in comparison to losing six wickets
for 78 runs from 31.1 overs in that group-stage encounter from 31.1 overs.
The fear factor did not Kayes and Mahmudullah them under
pressure.
Detachment
Aaaksh Chopra in one of his articles wrote, “Players
who are able to detach themselves from the importance of the occasion are
better equipped to handle pressure”. The best way to handle the pressure is by
keeping detached by the heat of the occasion as Mahmudullah said, “There wasn't
enough time to think about it. We were playing three games in the space of four
days. I was just playing him with an empty mind”.
Of course, playing with an “empty mind” works a lot in a
pressure-cooker situation. It is almost like getting into the zone where your
focus would only be on the bowler, his hand and the field set surrounding you.
Over the years, in trying circumstances, Mahmudullah’s such a ploy bailed out
Bangladesh on many occasions in the past.
Perhaps, Mustafizur Rahman also was bowling with an empty
mind in that penultimate over. He was suffering from cramps and did not look
fit enough to deliver the best, but his immense mental strength propelled him
to bowl and his ice-cool look never, let us assume, he was engulfed by the
pressure of the occasion, but it was just another routine over for him. Had he
been feeling the pressure, he might not have varied his length so much.
Bangladesh escaped the Afghanistan fear by three runs.
Note: This article has been published at Cricketsoccer on 24/09/2018 How did Bangladesh handle the pressure?
Thank You
Faisal Caesar
No comments:
Post a Comment