In the span of two days, the Cricket World Cup 2019 has
gifted three classic matches out of four. On June 3, Pakistan and England
fought a terrific high-scoring contest at Trent Bridge. It seemed, the low
scoring matches – scores around 200 to 250 – ensuring more chances of a
simmering contest would not be evident in this edition of World Cup. But after
the high-scoring nail-biter at Trent Bridge, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan,
Bangladesh, and New Zealand stepped up to prove, the 80s and 90s flavour in ODI
cricket still have not vanished completely.
While the drama of moon-sighting committee of
Bangladesh reached the level of a comical cinema, Sri Lankan bowlers were
fighting hard to keep the hopes of their team alive in the tournament. The Blue
Tigers from Asia clawed back into the rain-affected game match to shock the
Lankan Lions by bundling them out for 201.
The target for Afghanistan was just 187 from 41 overs
according to D/L method. But the Sri Lankan bowlers did not let their Asian
counterpart to inflict a shocker – they escaped the Afghan scare, and what more
important thing was – this World Cup bagged the first low-scoring thriller.
During the day of Eid-ul-Fitr in Bangladesh, the Tigers
followed the Sri Lankan way.
Their batting had been mediocre despite some brilliant
starts, and managed to post 244 in their allotted 50 overs. For the likes of
Kane Williamson and Ross Taylor such a total was not supposed to trigger a
migraine headache with an aura, but as the game progressed, the Bangladeshi slow-bowlers
and medium-pacers stranglehold the Kiwi batting line-up. The game went down the
wire as New Zealand prevailed in an absolute thriller of a contest at the Kia
Oval.
As a cricket fan, I cannot but praise the fight back of both
Sri Lanka and Bangladesh under pressure and neither can I ignore the efforts of
New Zealand and Afghanistan. But what the matches hide is, some mind-boggling
batting display by the above-mentioned teams, which won’t help to dream big.
For many experts, Bangladesh are still rated as a dangerous
underdog, but those who follow Bangladesh cricket closely, realize how good
this team is and they are capable of going a long way in this tournament.
Mentally this unit is very positive and their intent to fight back under any
circumstances, has made them a team to watch over the years.
But still, at times, the mediocrity of old days shows up and
threatens to spoil the party.
After being invited to bat first under the dark sky at
the Oval, Bangladesh’s start was steady. Kane Williamson thought his new ball
bowlers would be able to extract enough movement by pitching it full enough and
then exploit the bounce of the wicket to test the Bangladesh openers. The deck
did have movement off the air and not surface, but one thing Williamson forgot,
Tamim Iqbal and Soumya Sarkar are well-equipped to deal with full and short of
a length bowling. And they were dealing New Zealand’s new ball bowlers quite
confidently.
But madness followed.
Soumya and Tamim attempted poor shots, which led to their
demise. And when Shakib Al Hasan and Mushfiqur Rahim looked set to rewrite
another South-Africa-like-partnership, Mushfiq threw his wicket away by
digesting a run out and then Shakib followed attempting to cut a goodish length
ball from Colin de Grandhomme. The rest of the batting line-up failed to graft
any productive partnerships and kept on getting out while executing some poor
shots.
Even though the bowlers showed the guts to defend such a
total, which could have been around 280-290 had the batters not been insensible
enough. Getting out to better deliveries is one thing while walking for the
pavilion after scripting a poor shot is something else. Such execution of shots
only dents the confidence, which is hard-earned by defeating a top team like South
Africa.
In a tough World Cup like this, it is never possible to win
every match. One can show the character to convey the message, they are here to
win and the Bangladesh bowlers helped to convey this message, but this
inspiring fight back should not hide the mediocre batting display, which
requires a hard-check and the captain’s own performance requires the same as
well.
Frankly speaking, other than captaincy, in last two matches,
Mashrafe Bin Mortaza's performance had been below average. Even though his
bowling was toothless but field placement and bowling changes were impactful
against South Africa, but against New Zealand, he looked a tad defensive as
captain, and while bowling, he never looked confident enough to give a
breakthrough.
Mashrafe did not engage a slip while the pacers were
operating with two new batsmen at the crease. Any captain would have done that
while defending such a total. Even I think, he should have gone with one slip
and a short leg against the tail while operating with a spinner. It would have
built pressure.
Then, despite knowing the fact, Shakib and Miraz are his
strike bowlers, he should not have finished their full quota too early. With
Mashrafe, himself, bowling badly, automatically, Bangladesh are one bowler
short and thus, it would be important to exploit the available resources
smartly.
Note: This article has been published at Cricketsoccer on 05/06/2019 Well fought Bangladesh, but…..
Thank You
Faisal Caesar
No comments:
Post a Comment