The Same Old Story: Bangladesh Capsize On a Flat Deck

The Rawalpindi wicket, true to its reputation, presented a paradox for both batters and bowlers. Initially, the pitch offered some movement during the first hour, but its relatively low bounce—measuring an average of 1 cm less than the Test against Sri Lanka—meant bowlers had to rely on precision rather than assistance. The occasional bounce that was visible owed much to the hardness of the new ball and the undeniable skill of the Pakistani pacers. However, as the day wore on, the pitch’s true nature was laid bare: a flat, batting-friendly surface.

Given the conditions, this was a pitch on which the batters should have thrived, especially after being invited to bat first. Yet, Bangladesh’s top order faltered. The recurring issue was their tendency to commit to shots too early, particularly against deliveries outside the off-stump. Instead of adjusting to the wicket and applying patience, they succumbed to expansive strokes that could have been avoided.

The middle order’s dismissals painted a similar picture—not the result of unplayable deliveries but rather a lack of discipline and application. The only standout was Mohammad Mithun, who demonstrated the temperament needed for such conditions. His innings was marked by composure, and it took an exceptional delivery to dislodge him, underscoring what could have been achieved with better shot selection.

This wicket, by all accounts, was a 400-run deck in the first innings. Bangladesh’s inability to post a competitive total was a product of their own making. Poor shot selection and the lack of strike rotation undermined their efforts. Instead of building partnerships, they allowed themselves to be lured into false strokes, handing the initiative to Pakistan.

From the hosts’ perspective, their bowling approach was pragmatic rather than spectacular. Recognizing the pitch’s limitations, they focused on building pressure through dot balls, effectively baiting the Bangladesh batters into errors. This strategy, while not requiring extraordinary effort, proved highly effective.

In the end, this was a tale of missed opportunities for the visitors. On a track that demanded patience and careful shot-making, they fell short—not because of the opposition’s brilliance but due to their own shortcomings.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar