Reflections on Messi’s Remarks: A Brazil Fan Responds

   

Dear Lionel Messi,

You once said, “We could have gone further but we weren't allowed into the final. Corruption, referees, and all the rest stopped people from enjoying the football.” You even added,“Brazil champions? No doubt. Sadly, I think it’s set up for Brazil.”

With due respect, I’d like to respond to both of your statements.

On Your Team's Performance

Firstly, let’s address your frustration about not reaching the final. Honestly, you were fortunate to even reach the semi-final given the underwhelming nature of your team. You and your squad pale in comparison to the Argentina teams led by legends like Gabriel Batistuta and Juan Román Riquelme. Back then, Brazil fans viewed Argentina with a sense of tension and respect because they were a team—a cohesive, well-rounded unit driven by purpose, not just a platform for individual brilliance.  

But the Argentina side you’ve led in recent years? It lacks the same collective identity. Your performances for the national team have often been criticized as underwhelming compared to your club career. And no, this is not just about bad luck or biased refereeing—sometimes, you need to accept that your side wasn't strong enough.

The Condor Plan and the 1978 World Cup Scandal 

Now, let's talk about corruption—since you brought it up. Have you considered the role Argentina played in the real controversies of the past?  

In the second round of the 1978 World Cup, Argentina, as the host, found itself in a tricky position. Brazil had beaten Poland 3-1 and Peru 3-0, meaning Argentina needed a 4-0 or 5-1 win over Peru to qualify for the final. But beating Peru by such a margin wasn’t realistic—at least, not without outside interference. 

This is where politics came into play. Dictator Jorge Videla, desperate to exploit Argentina’s potential triumph to cover up the atrocities of his regime, struck a deal with Peruvian leader Francisco Bermúdez. Videla offered asylum for 13 Peruvian prisoners, but only if Peru "deliberately lost" to Argentina.  

During the match, even Peru’s goalkeeper—a player of Argentine origin—made no real effort to stop the goals, allowing Argentina to win 6-0 and reach the final. Years later, in 2012, former Peruvian Senator Genaro Ledesma confirmed the existence of this sordid arrangement.  

Was that victory the product of sportsmanship, or political corruption?

The 1978 Pitch and Referee Bias 

You have also complained about the poor pitch conditions during the 2019 Copa América. Do you remember how Argentina treated Brazil in the 1978 World Cup? Brazil was forced to play its matches in Mar del Plata, on a substandard pitch that significantly hampered their gameplay. Brazil struggled to adapt and ended up drawing against Spain in one of those matches.  

And then there’s the 1978 incident involving Sweden, where Zico’s last-minute header was controversially ruled out after the referee ended the match abruptly, claiming time had expired. That decision robbed Brazil of the top spot in their group, forcing them into a tougher path. Was that fair? Or was it another example of Argentina manipulating events to its advantage?

FIFA and Your Group Stage "Luck"

Now, let’s address your insinuation about Brazil’s supposed “set-up” to win the Copa América. If we examine FIFA’s treatment of Argentina from 2010 to 2018, we see a pattern that raises questions. Argentina was placed in relatively favourable groups across three consecutive World Cups, always facing Nigeria. In both 2010 and 2014, your team had an easy path out of the group stage.  

But luck can only take you so far. In 2010, an overconfident Argentina underestimated a young German side and was humiliated 4-0. And in 2014, despite an easy route to the final, you were left hoping Germany would go easy on you. The Germans, as always, didn’t oblige.  

In 2018, Argentina was placed in a group with Croatia, Nigeria, and Iceland—hardly the strongest opposition. Yet, your team struggled, finishing second in the group. The French wasted no time in showing Argentina its limitations in the knockout stage.  

Meanwhile, Cristiano Ronaldo was consistently placed in tougher groups and faced greater challenges throughout these tournaments. Brazil, too, has suffered from controversial refereeing decisions—particularly at the 2018 World Cup and on home soil in 2014.  

Selective Memories and Double Standards

If we dig deeper, we could bring up several infamous incidents involving Argentina that cast doubt on your claim of unfair treatment.  

Hand of God: Diego Maradona's blatant handball against England in 1986 remains one of football’s most infamous moments.

The Holy Water Scandal: Argentine staff allegedly gave Brazilian players sedative-laced water during a Copa América match in 1990.  

Italia 1990: Maradona got away with a blatant handball inside his own penalty area against the Soviet Union. 

 

World Cup 1998: Diego Simeone’s theatrics led to David Beckham’s red card, changing the course of England’s campaign.  

2019 vs. Liverpool: Even you, Leo, were accused of placing the ball several meters ahead of the correct spot while taking a decisive free-kick at Camp Nou.

These incidents highlight that Argentina has benefited from questionable decisions on numerous occasions. To now complain about bias or corruption seems hypocritical at best.

In Conclusion: Think Before You Speak

Football, like life, is full of highs and lows. Every team experiences moments of triumph and injustice. But to claim that corruption robbed Argentina in recent tournaments without any concrete evidence is to ignore the privileges and benefits your team has enjoyed throughout history.  

Brazil has endured its share of setbacks and questionable decisions, but we’ve rarely resorted to making excuses. Instead, we’ve focused on rebuilding and striving to be better. You, Leo, are an exceptional player—but it’s time to acknowledge that even legends don’t always win.  

So, next time you feel the urge to point fingers, remember the past. Before accusing others, reflect on the privileges and questionable incidents that have benefited Argentina. And perhaps—just perhaps—you’ll find it wiser to let your football do the talking.

With respect and a love for the beautiful game,  

A Brazil Fan

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The "Holy Water" Scandal: When Deception Darkened the Game's Fair Play

 

Sports are meant to be a testament to both passion and integrity. The spirit of fair play—whether in cricket, football, or basketball—is fundamental, an unspoken contract between players and fans, and cheating shatters this bond. Not only does it tarnish the purity of competition, but it also sends a troubling message to fans, especially the young, who look up to these athletes with admiration and respect. Yet history reminds us that the realm of sports has often been shadowed by moments of cunning deceit. Some may romanticize these acts, but for millions, they are stains on the legacy of sport.

Among the infamous moments in football history, the "Hand of God" stands out, but it is far from alone. Cheating has surfaced in various forms, sparking anger and controversy in the history of the FIFA World Cup. These moments provoke fierce debates and raise timeless questions about the lengths players and teams go to in pursuit of victory. One of the most controversial examples of this came during the 1990 FIFA World Cup, held in Italy, where accusations of foul play added a sinister undertone to an already tense tournament.

The fourteenth FIFA World Cup, played on Italian soil, was a tournament that left critics unimpressed. Marked by defensive play and an overreliance on penalty shootouts to determine victors, Italia '90 lacked the attacking dynamism expected on the world’s grandest stage. Even traditionally aggressive teams like Brazil, Holland, England, and Italy seemed to pull back, favouring caution over creativity. Only West Germany showed the spark of attacking football, but even they struggled to maintain momentum.

Yet Italia '90 was also the stage for some of football's most infamous controversies. Among them was a heated showdown on June 24, 1990, in Turin, between South American giants Argentina and Brazil. The reigning champions, Argentina, arrived with an air of vulnerability. A surprising defeat to Cameroon in their opening game and a shaky draw with Romania had left the team looking fragile, especially as they dealt with injuries and underperforming players. But Argentina still had one advantage: the cunning of Diego Armando Maradona, a man revered for his talent as much as he was questioned for his tactics.

Brazil, on the other hand, approached the match with cautious confidence. Although not quite the formidable force of previous years, they had dominated their group-stage matches and seemed poised for success. The game began with Brazil in control; their players created chance after chance, with Careca missing opportunities by mere inches, and Carlos Dunga dictating the pace from midfield. Argentina, struggling to gain a foothold, looked almost helpless under Brazil's relentless attack.

But as the second half wore on, an unusual incident changed the rhythm of the game. Brazilian left-back Branco, tasked with marking Maradona, had contained him effectively, ensuring that the Argentine playmaker could barely influence the game. Frustrated, Maradona sought a way to tip the scales. In a fateful pause during play, the Argentine team’s physio, Miguel di Lorenzo, brought out water bottles for the players. According to accounts, Maradona allegedly instructed that one bottle be “prepared” for Branco. Unsuspecting, Branco took a sip—and soon found himself feeling sluggish, his movements dulled.

In that critical moment, Maradona seized the opportunity he had created. Suddenly freed from Branco’s grip, he made a trademark solo run down the right flank—a break from his usual left-sided play—and set up Claudio Caniggia, who rounded Brazilian goalkeeper Taffarel to score the game’s only goal. Argentina triumphed 1-0, sending Brazil home in a defeat laced with controversy. For many Brazilian fans, the loss was bitter; for many, it felt stolen.

After the match, Branco claimed that the water he’d been offered was tainted. Argentine officials, predictably, denied any wrongdoing, but suspicion lingered. It wasn’t until over a decade later, in a televised interview, that Maradona casually admitted the truth: the water bottle given to Branco had indeed been tampered with. This revelation ignited fury among Brazilian fans and players alike, stirring a scandal that came to be known as the “Holy Water” incident.

The fallout was swift and polarized. Argentine coach Carlos Bilardo, who initially denied any knowledge of the incident, inadvertently revealed his complicity by later admitting he “could not deny” the events, while other Argentine players and officials maintained their innocence. Brazilian players like Bebeto spoke openly about the betrayal, and even Brazil’s football federation briefly considered legal action. However, the Brazilian Football Confederation’s secretary-general, Ricardo Teixeira, ultimately chose not to pursue the matter, recognizing that the result could not be changed.

The "Holy Water" scandal exposed the darker side of Maradona's legacy. While his genius on the pitch remains uncontested, this incident highlighted the lengths to which he would go to secure victory. For some, it was a tactical masterstroke; for others, a profound betrayal of sportsmanship. Coach Sebastiao Lazaroni summed up the sentiment, condemning it as a “dirty game” that had no place in the sport, regardless of when it occurred. He urged FIFA to take a stand, arguing that the mere passage of time should not excuse such behaviour.

Ironically, Argentina’s victory was short-lived. Though they reached the finals, they ultimately lost to West Germany, marking the beginning of a decades-long title drought. Many viewed this defeat as karmic justice, a fitting end to a campaign marred by deception.

The "Holy Water" scandal remains one of the most controversial moments in football history—a reminder that in the world of sports, glory pursued at any cost often leaves a lasting stain. Maradona’s brilliance as a player is unquestionable, but his legacy, tainted by moments like this, reflects the complex interplay between genius and guile. It is a story that underscores an essential truth: while victory can be achieved through deceit, true greatness lies only in fair play.

  

Video Link 1: Holy Water Scandal

Video Link 2: Holy Water Scandal

Video Link 3: Holy Water Scandal 
 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar