Unsettled Ground and Unforgiving Cricket: A Test of Character at Bourda

The Bourda Gamble: A New Pitch with Old Habits

For years, Georgetown's Bourda ground had earned a reputation as a benign surface—slow, low, and unthreatening. In a bid to inject fresh life into it, curators relaid the pitch the previous year, hoping to introduce pace and bounce. But as any groundsman will tell you, a pitch needs time—time to bake under the sun, time to settle into its new nature. What West Indies got instead was a surface not just unpredictable, but borderline treacherous.

It was on this unsettled stage that West Indies, trailing in the series, finally won the toss. A small tactical victory, but on this pitch, it was no small thing. Batting first was a necessity. Batting big, a potential clincher.

Solid Beginnings, Sudden Ruin: The West Indian First Innings

Fredericks and Greenidge walked out with purpose and poise. For the first hour and a half, they weathered the early storm, surviving sharp spells from Walker and Hammond. Their 55-run stand was not sparkling, but it was sturdy—a necessary investment on an increasingly mischievous pitch.

Then came a twist in the tale.

Doug Walters, who had been barely a footnote with the ball during the tour, produced a double strike in a single over, dismissing both openers with deceptive seam movement. The ground fell into a hush. Soon after, Kallicharran was run out in a moment of madness—an error that would set the tone for a series of missteps.

The Builders: Lloyd and Kanhai’s Partnership of Steel

With the innings teetering, Rohan Kanhai and Clive Lloyd embarked on a rescue act. It was a partnership forged in temperament and tensile strength. Kanhai, now captain, had brought a quiet discipline to his flamboyant style, while Lloyd—usually a figure of dominant strokeplay—chose caution over carnage.

What unfolded was a stand of 187 painstaking runs over nearly four hours. Kanhai compiled 57, understated but vital. But it was Lloyd’s innings—137 off nearly six hours—that stood out. A paradox of sorts: awkward yet determined, unconvincing yet effective. It was a century that bore the marks of a general carrying a tired army on his back.

The lower order, however, folded under renewed pressure from Walker and Hammond. Walters returned to polish off the tail, finishing with an impressive 5 for 66.

Australia Responds: A Chappell Classic and Walters’ Grace

Australia began shakily, losing both openers with only 36 on the board. But the Chappell brothers, as they so often did, steadied the ship. Greg and Ian methodically added 121. On a surface where the bounce whispered threats and the spinners loomed, their judgment was impeccable.

Greg eventually fell to a clever delivery from Willett. Ian, stoic as ever, raised a captain’s hundred—109 in just over five hours. And then, once again, it was Walters’ turn to shine. This time with the bat.

His innings was an education in playing spin with nimble feet and supple wrists. Against the grain of the pitch’s treachery, he scored freely, confidently, even joyfully. Australia finished just 25 runs short of the West Indies' total, and in psychological terms, perhaps even ahead.

Fourth Day Folly: West Indies Collapse in a Heap

As the fourth day began, West Indies had a chance—not just to win the Test, but to restore belief. A target of 250 would have made Australia sweat on a wearing surface. But what followed was a meltdown of astonishing proportions.

Batting with the urgency of a side chasing a 400-run deficit, the West Indies self-destructed. Shot after reckless shot betrayed their anxiety. Only Kanhai could count himself unfortunate, undone by a shooter from Walker that would have floored any batsman.

Hammond bowled with skill and movement, picking up the first four wickets. Walters and Walker finished the demolition. From 3 for no loss, the West Indies slid to 109 all out in a session and a half.

A Walk to Victory: Australia Stroll Through the Chase

Needing 135 to win, Australia might have anticipated a final-day fight. But the West Indies, gutted by their second-innings implosion, offered little resistance. Stackpole and Redpath knocked off the runs with clinical ease, sealing the win with almost a day to spare.

Final Reflections: What Bourda Told Us

This was a Test that mirrored the pitch it was played on—volatile, layered, and unforgiving. At its heart was the theme of discipline. Australia showed it. West Indies, under pressure, abandoned it.

Lloyd’s innings will be remembered as a study of gritty leadership. The Chappells and Walters, meanwhile, showcased the virtue of adapting to conditions rather than overpowering them. For the West Indies, the loss was not just on the scoreboard but in execution—in the space between intent and impatience.

As the dust settled at Bourda, the lesson was clear: on a pitch where nothing came easy, those who stayed grounded emerged victorious.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Rohan Kanhai: The Maestro Who Redefined Batting Artistry

Rohan Kanhai took creative genius in batting or aestheticism to regions unexplored. He virtually gave the art of batting a new dimension, being the equivalent of a Beethoven or Rembrandt to batting. When in full flow, he was the manifestation of a divine energy. His ability to innovate strokes made him a unique craftsman of the game. He could eviscerate any bowling attack in any conditions, transcending conventional batting techniques.

On his day, there was arguably no more consummate batsman than Kanhai. He embodied the inventiveness of Denis Compton, the technical solidity of Sunil Gavaskar, and the flamboyance of Viv Richards. Kanhai’s batting was a synthesis of originality and sportsmanship, pushing the boundaries of what was previously thought possible in the game. Even when he decimated bowling attacks, there was an aesthetic grace in his craft. While others wore down attacks, Kanhai dissected them with surgical precision, much like a sculptor chiseling a monument. He was poetry in motion, though this poetic elegance never diluted the sheer power of his stroke play.

Kanhai’s signature roti shot, or the falling sweep-hook stroke, remains one of the most enigmatic shots in cricketing history. A cross between a sweep and a hook, he executed it with a sense of theater. As the ball came towards him, he would take off the ground, delivering a mortal blow to the ball with a horizontal blade. He would then land gracefully on his back, the bat still aloft, his eyes fixated on the ball soaring beyond the backward square boundary. This shot required impeccable footwork, timing, self-confidence, and an instinctive flair. No batsman has since been able to replicate it with the same effectiveness and elegance.

Born on December 26, 1935, in Port Mourant, British Guyana, Kanhai played for his country from 1954-55 until 1973-74. Of Indian ancestral origins, Kanhai initially served as a wicketkeeper-batsman. In his first three Tests, he kept wickets before Franz Alexander took over behind the stumps, though he would occasionally deputize as a keeper later in his career. His Test debut came during the 1957 tour of England.

Standing at just 5 feet 4 inches, Kanhai joined the elite ranks of short batting greats like Don Bradman, Hanif Mohammad, Sunil Gavaskar, Sachin Tendulkar, Neil Harvey, and Virender Sehwag. Beyond his batting brilliance, he symbolized the spirit of sportsmanship and grace. He always walked when he was out and never resorted to unethical play. Few cricketing greats have upheld the spirit of the game with such magnanimity and humility.

Career Highlights

Kanhai’s career was studded with magnificent performances. In 1958-59, during the India tour, he aggregated 538 runs at an average of 66.8. His 256 at Calcutta was an epic, and his 99 later in the series was equally commendable. In 1959, in Pakistan, his 217 at Lahore on a turning track was a masterpiece.

The 1960-61 series in Australia saw him overshadow even the legendary Sir Garfield Sobers, topping the averages at 50.3 and amassing 503 runs. His back-to-back centuries of 115 and 117 at Adelaide, scored at a run-a-minute, evoked memories of Bradman’s dominance. He made even elite bowlers like Richie Benaud and Alan Davidson look ordinary. Cricket writer Moyes classed Kanhai’s batting as scintillating, while Alan Davidson rated Kanhai ahead of Sobers.

One of his most remarkable innings came in 1960 at Trinidad, where he scored 110 out of a team total of 244 on a wearing pitch. His ability to excel in adverse conditions was exemplified in 1963 in England, where he scored 92 at Leeds and 77 at the Oval, dismantling the English attack under seaming conditions.

In the 1965 home series against Australia, Kanhai played a pivotal role in West Indies’ first-ever series victory against the Australians. His 129 at Bridgetown and 121 at Port of Spain helped secure the historic triumph. In 1968-69, against England at home, he averaged above 57, scoring two commanding centuries at Georgetown and Trinidad, clinically dismantling the likes of fast bowler John Snow. Ironically, his brilliance could not prevent his team from losing the series.

Kanhai continued to dominate throughout the early 1970s. In the 1970-71 home series against India, he was the epitome of consistency, averaging over 54. His unbeaten 158 at Kingston remains one of his most sublime Test innings. The unofficial 1971-72 series against Australia, where he represented the Rest of the World XI, saw him average 69.75, including two centuries. His 118 in the second unofficial Test at Perth was a masterclass in stroke play against the hostility of Dennis Lillee on one of the fastest tracks in the world.

He bid farewell to international cricket in style, scoring a crucial 55 in the final of the 1975 Prudential World Cup. His composed innings played a key role in captain Clive Lloyd’s team securing the first-ever World Cup title for West Indies.

Experts’ Ratings of Kanhai

John Woodcock believed that no batsman resembled Bradman more closely than Kanhai. Len Hutton opined that on his day, Kanhai came within touching distance of Bradman’s greatness. CLR James proclaimed that Kanhai had discovered and created a new dimension in batting, venturing into realms unknown even to Bradman.

Ian McDonald, the esteemed cricket historian, ranked Kanhai above all other batsmen he had seen, including Sobers, Richards, and Lara, because of his all-encompassing greatness. Michael Manley regarded him as the most technically sound batsman produced by the West Indies. Sunil Gavaskar revered Kanhai as his role model and the most complete batsman he had ever seen.

Evaluation of His Legacy

Kanhai’s legacy in cricket is debated, but his stature as a great batsman is unquestionable. In 79 Tests, he scored 6,227 runs at an average of 47.53, with 15 centuries. While these statistics do not place him ahead of contemporaries like Sobers or later greats like Richards, Lara, or Tendulkar, the impact of his innings often surpassed raw numbers.

He played some of the finest bowling attacks of his time, including Fred Trueman, John Snow, Graham McKenzie, and Richie Benaud, and still managed to deliver stunning performances. Against genuine pace and high-quality spin, Kanhai stood tall. Gary Sobers himself rated Kanhai as the best batsman of his era, on par with Viv Richards.

Although Kanhai lacked the insatiable hunger for records that defined players like Bradman, Sobers, and Gavaskar, his artistry and brilliance were unparalleled. He shaped the trajectory of West Indies cricket, helping transform them into one of the most formidable teams of all time.

Despite being underrated in many all-time rankings, Kanhai’s influence on the game remains immense. His ability to dominate in adverse conditions, his revolutionary stroke play, and his indelible sportsmanship ensure that his name is etched among the game’s all-time greats. He may not always be mentioned alongside Richards, Lara, or Tendulkar, but for those who witnessed his genius, Rohan Kanhai remains an icon of unparalleled batting mastery.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar