Salim Malik’s Defiance and Australia’s Ghosts

Once again, Salim Malik stood like a man wading through quicksand, steadying Pakistan from another slide into the familiar abyss. Australia, meanwhile, conquered every facet of the contest except the one that mattered — the scoreboard. Their own hands betrayed them: five dropped catches, four of them in the first innings, as if the ghosts of Karachi and Lahore were conspiring to remind them that ruthlessness is more a state of mind than a technique.

Malik had chosen to bat on a surface that was soft and hesitant, its top layer deceptive, its pace uneven. It was a decision not born of boldness but of necessity. Within hours of the toss, Pakistan’s spearheads — Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis — had withdrawn, “officially” injured but, to the more cynical, casualties of a deeper dressing-room schism. That left Malik with an attack as brittle as it was brave: Aqib Javed shouldering too much, and Mohsin Kamal returning after seven long years in exile from Test cricket — an exile that said more about Pakistan’s selection chaos than about the man himself.

The Australians, too, arrived limping from their own private infirmary. Ian Healy’s left thumb was fractured, Steve Waugh’s shoulder damaged, and debutant Phil Emery, flown in as emergency cover, promptly bruised his own thumb. This was a team stitched together by defiance more than by fitness, and that fragility seeped into their cricket.

Only two days earlier, they had lifted the limited-overs trophy, jubilant and unguarded. But joy can dull the edge of discipline. When the Test began, they were sloppy, perhaps still caught between celebration and fatigue. Inzamam-ul-Haq was dropped on one and made 66. Ijaz Ahmed, controversially recalled on the back of fleeting one-day form, was also reprieved early on his way to 48. And Moin Khan, deputizing for the injured Rashid Latif, was twice granted life — on 51 and 70 — before converting it into his maiden Test century: an unbeaten 115 laced with 13 fours and three audacious sixes. Pakistan’s 373 felt spirited, if not impregnable — the kind of total that mocked the opponent’s wastefulness.

Yet Australia, as they had done all series, clawed their way back. Half-centuries from Slater, Mark Waugh, the serene Bevan, and a composed Justin Langer gave them an 82-run lead — their third such advantage in as many Tests. But leads in the subcontinent are only illusions until converted into victories.

Then came the rhythm of Glenn McGrath’s rebirth — tall, cold, relentless. He sliced through Pakistan’s fragile top order with surgical precision, restoring Australian belief. By the dawn of the final day, Pakistan were just 55 runs ahead with five wickets standing. The finish seemed preordained.

But Malik was not done rewriting scripts. Across two days — two hundred minutes on the fourth, three hundred on the fifth — he stitched together an innings of quiet ferocity. His strokes were less aggression than endurance, each one a rebuttal to fate. Around him, players found renewed purpose. Aamir Sohail, nursing a stiff neck so severe he had worn a brace the previous afternoon, was coaxed back into defiance. Together, they forged a 196-run stand in just over three and a half hours — an alliance that turned Australian certainty into resignation.

Even Shane Warne, that conjurer of collapse, could only toil in weary admiration. His three wickets for 104 in the second innings brought his match haul to nine for 240 — heroic numbers, yet ones that spoke of exhaustion more than domination. Seventy-one overs of relentless spin had left his right shoulder the subject of concern, as if the burden of rescuing Australia’s destiny had finally begun to exact its toll.

When the final wicket refused to fall, and Malik walked off unbeaten, the day felt heavier than a draw. It was a lesson — that courage often wears the mask of pragmatism, that beauty in cricket is not always in flight but in survival. Australia had controlled the match; Pakistan had captured its soul.

 Thank You

Faisal Caesar

 

The Chaotic Elegance of Nehru Cup, 1989

There are tournaments remembered for their trophies, and there are those remembered for their tales.

The 1989 Nehru Cup — staged across the sprawling geography of India — belongs to the latter. It was an event where planning collapsed under its own ambition, and yet out of chaos emerged one of Pakistan’s most compelling cricketing odysseys.

The scheduling bordered on absurdity. Teams were made to play two, occasionally three, matches in a single day — a logistical nightmare that forced exhausted squads to traverse thousands of kilometres between fixtures. Fatigue became the twelfth man; strategy, a luxury. Pakistan, perpetually in transit, fielded a different XI almost every match — Waqar Younis, Aaqib Javed, and even Javed Miandad alternated between presence and absence. Each game unfolded as an experiment in survival.

Yet within this relentless churn, there was also vitality. The late 1980s were the golden age of one-day cricket tournaments — short, fierce, and intensely followed. The Nehru Cup assembled six heavyweights of the era: India, Pakistan, West Indies, England, Australia, and Sri Lanka — a microcosm of the cricketing world brought together on Indian soil.

A Faltering Start and Flickers of Defiance

Pakistan’s campaign began inauspiciously. In their opening match against England, their batting was funereal — slow, uncertain, devoid of spark. Only Saleem Malik’s 42 from 59 balls provided dignity amid mediocrity. But such teams, under Imran Khan’s stewardship, rarely succumbed twice in the same way.

Against Australia, the reigning world champions, Pakistan roared back with defiance. Defending a modest 205, they won by 66 runs — a triumph stitched together through discipline and belief. Shoaib Mohammad’s watchful half-century anchored the innings, Javed Miandad’s 34 steadied it, and Wasim Akram’s spirited 28 gave it momentum. Then came the bowling — Imran Khan, in one of those spells that defined his aura, took 3 for 13 in eight overs, with Abdul Qadir weaving his quiet menace from the other end.

Momentum, though, remained fragile. The next encounter against the West Indies revealed both brilliance and brittleness. Despite a valiant 77 from Aamir Malik and a fluent 44 from Saleem Malik, Pakistan’s 223 proved insufficient. Richie Richardson and Viv Richards, with clinical elegance, chased it down — a reminder that experience still dictated outcomes in those days.

Leadership in Motion

Against Sri Lanka, Imran Khan’s strategic mind took center stage. Javed Miandad sat out, and Aamir Malik, despite his previous heroics, was pushed down the order. It was a captain’s experiment in controlled unpredictability — and it worked. Imran himself led with a commanding 84, steering Pakistan to 219. When Sri Lanka seemed poised for victory at 187 for 2, they imploded to 213 all out — undone by three run-outs and the spin trio of Wasim Akram, Akram Raza, and Abdul Qadir, who took two wickets each. Imran, intriguingly, came on as the sixth bowler — a master manipulating the tempo rather than submitting to it.

The Decisive Climb

Then came the match that mattered — the group decider against India. The stakes were elemental: win, and reach the semifinals; lose, and go home.

Aamir Malik (51) and Ramiz Raja (77) provided a serene yet assertive opening, their partnership the perfect blueprint for a chase or a build. Imran Khan’s cameo — 47 off just 39 balls — added the flourish. The total, 279, was a declaration of intent.

India’s reply began with deceptive promise. Krishnamachari Srikkanth (65) and Raman Lamba (57) took them to 120 for none. Then, as if on cue, Pakistan’s spinners ensnared them. From 155 for 2, India crumbled to 202 all out. Wasim Akram and Mushtaq Ahmed bowled with precision; the decision to rest Imran from bowling and instead deploy three spinners proved inspired. It was tactical intellect cloaked in calm — the hallmark of a team rediscovering itself.

The Semifinal: Poise in a Storm

Rain reduced the semifinal against England to 30 overs a side — a format tailor-made for volatility. England, led by Robin Smith’s assured 55, posted 194. Abdul Qadir and Waqar Younis struck regularly, but the chase that followed was pure artistry.

Ramiz Raja, elegant and composed, crafted 85 off 82 balls; Saleem Malik, electric and audacious, blazed 66 from 41. Their partnership was a study in rhythm and restraint, tempo and timing. The target was reached with ease — and for once, Imran Khan was not named Man of the Match, a rare occurrence in a tournament that bore his imprint.

In the other semifinal, West Indies brushed aside India by eight wickets — setting the stage for a final rich in narrative tension: the disciplined Caribbean giants versus Pakistan’s mercurial genius.

The Final in the City of Joy

The finale in Calcutta (now Kolkata) unfolded as if scripted for drama. It had theatre, pressure, and poetry — and in the end, it found its crescendo in the most cinematic fashion imaginable.

Pakistan required four runs from the final over. Akram Raza had just been dismissed — run out by Courtney Walsh’s stunning direct hit from 35 yards. Imran Khan took a single, reducing the equation to three off two balls. With his main bowlers already spent, Viv Richards had no choice but to bowl the decisive over himself.

Then, history bent its arc. Wasim Akram — young, fearless, unflinching — met the next delivery with a mighty swing, sending the ball soaring over wide mid-wicket for a towering six. The roar that followed was not just triumphal; it was liberating. The match, the tournament, and perhaps the entire narrative of Pakistan’s campaign crystallized in that single, audacious stroke.

Layers Beneath the Drama

Pakistan’s chase had been a tapestry of tempo and tenacity. Ramiz Raja’s brisk 35 from 31 balls, stitched with six boundaries, gave the innings its early heartbeat. His stand of 60 with Ijaz Ahmed (56) stabilized the platform, while Saleem Malik’s commanding 71 off 62 brought grace and aggression in equal measure. His straight six off Walsh shimmered as one of the innings’ most majestic strokes.

Imran Khan’s entry signaled assurance. Together with Malik, he added 93 off 95 balls — leadership translated into partnership. Pakistan never allowed the asking rate to intimidate them; they played as if belief itself was a tactic.

For the West Indies, Desmond Haynes anchored the innings with an unbeaten 107 from 134 balls — his sixteenth one-day century, a masterpiece of patience in an age of flourish. Yet even his monument of control could not conceal the hesitancy of the Caribbean middle order. Imran Khan’s death spell — nine consecutive overs of strategic precision — yielded three wickets, including that of Viv Richards. Richards’ brief 21 off 11 balls, punctuated by a six and two fours, was extinguished by Imran’s unerring discipline. The symbolism was unmistakable: the old lion felled by the new.

Coda: A Six Beyond Its Score

That final stroke — Wasim Akram’s soaring six — became more than a winning shot. It was an assertion of spirit, a prelude to the cricketer he would become: unpredictable, destructive, dazzling. It announced a changing of the guard, a transition from Imran’s command to the audacious energy of a younger generation.

The victory was not merely a result; it was a statement. It reflected a team that had fought through fatigue, flawed logistics, and fluctuating lineups — and yet found beauty amid chaos.

Epilogue: The Essence of Resilience

The 1989 Nehru Cup was never destined to be remembered for perfect cricket. It was remembered because it mirrored life itself — messy, erratic, exhausting, but occasionally transcendent.

Pakistan’s journey through it was a portrait of improvisation under duress. From sleepless train rides to reshuffled XIs, from tactical gambles to moments of sheer genius, they embodied the paradox of cricket: a game where discipline and disorder often coexist.

In the end, the Nehru Cup did not just test Pakistan’s skill. It revealed its soul — a blend of defiance, artistry, and endurance.

And in that final moment — when Wasim’s blade met Richards’s delivery under Calcutta’s lights — cricket became poetry, and chaos found its rhythm.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

A Thrilling Encounter at Kolkata: Pakistan Lift The Nehru Cup

Cricket, at its finest, offers moments of high drama, strategic depth, and individual brilliance. This match between Pakistan and the West Indies was a prime example—a contest that ebbed and flowed before culminating in an electrifying finish. It was a battle of power, precision, and nerve, with Pakistan ultimately emerging victorious, thanks to a spectacular final-over climax orchestrated by Wasim Akram.

West Indies’ Steady Build-Up: Haynes Anchors the Innings

The West Indies innings unfolded in a measured manner, constructed methodically rather than with explosive intent. At the heart of their total was an unbeaten century by Desmond Haynes, whose 107 off 134 balls was a masterclass in controlled aggression. His sixteenth one-day international hundred underscored his ability to pace an innings with patience while capitalizing on loose deliveries. 

Though the innings lacked outright fireworks for the most part, Viv Richards provided a late injection of momentum. His brief yet impactful cameo—21 runs off just 11 balls, including a six and two fours—suggested the potential for a final flourish. However, Pakistan’s captain, Imran Khan, had other plans. Returning for a crucial spell at the death, he applied the brakes on West Indies’ scoring, claiming three wickets in five overs. His removal of Richards was a defining moment, curbing what could have been a dangerous late assault.

Pakistan’s Aggressive Chase: A Team Effort in Pursuit of Victory

Unlike the West Indies, who built their innings gradually, Pakistan adopted a more attacking approach from the outset. Though they lost Aamer Malik early, their top-order batsmen ensured that the required run rate was never beyond reach. 

Ramiz Raja set the tempo with a fluent 35 off 31 balls, peppered with six crisp boundaries. His partnership with Ijaz Ahmed (56 off 66) laid a solid foundation, adding 60 runs in quick time. Ijaz then combined with Salim Malik in another crucial stand, with the latter playing a particularly aggressive knock. Salim’s 71 off 62 balls was laced with intent, and his audacity shone through when he launched a straight six off Courtney Walsh, signalling Pakistan’s determination to dictate terms. 

The defining phase of Pakistan’s chase came when Salim and Imran Khan forged a 93-run partnership off 95 deliveries. Their stand ensured that Pakistan remained on course despite the mounting pressure of a high-stakes finish.

The Final-Over Drama: Wasim Akram’s Match-Winning Shot

As the match approached its climax, the tension was palpable. The West Indies had exhausted their premier bowlers earlier in a bid to stifle Pakistan’s progress, leaving Viv Richards to bowl the decisive final over. It was a tactical gamble that Pakistan was ready to exploit. 

With only a handful of runs required, disaster briefly loomed for Pakistan when Akram Raza was run out—his dismissal a result of Walsh’s brilliant direct hit from 35 yards. This brought Wasim Akram to the crease with the match hanging in the balance. 

Imran Khan managed to take a single, reducing the equation to three runs needed off the last two balls. The moment called for either composure or audacity—and Wasim Akram chose the latter. With a fearless swing of the bat, he launched Richards’ penultimate delivery high over wide mid-wicket. The ball sailed into the stands, sealing a sensational victory for Pakistan in the most emphatic fashion possible. 

Conclusion: A Match to Remember

This encounter had all the hallmarks of a classic: a solid innings from Desmond Haynes, a fiery cameo from Richards, a disciplined bowling display from Imran Khan, and a calculated yet aggressive chase from Pakistan’s batsmen. But in the end, it was Wasim Akram’s moment of brilliance that provided the perfect climax—a six that will be remembered as a defining stroke in an unforgettable contest.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

The Day Giants Crumbled: Pakistan’s Historic Conquest of the Invincibles

A Battle Against Cricketing Gods

In the 1980s, defeating the West Indies was nothing short of a cricketing miracle. They were the undoubted emperors of the game — a team forged in fire, feared for their batting might and legendary pace battery that terrorized opponents into collapse. Yet, in the 1986 Test at Faisalabad, Pakistan, battling injuries, pressure, and the odds, scripted a performance that would carve its own myth into cricketing folklore. It was not merely a victory but a conquest of invincibility; a moment where defiance triumphed over dominance.

West Indies Assert Supremacy: The Pace Quartet Strikes Early

Pakistan’s decision to bat first seemed destined for disaster when Malcolm Marshall, Patrick Patterson, and Tony Gray, debuting with fire, wreaked havoc. Reduced to 37 for 5, Pakistan looked set for humiliation.

Yet, captain Imran Khan stood like a lone pillar, his, fighting 61 a testimony to leadership under siege. Salim Malik’s painful injury, a fractured arm inflicted by a brutal delivery, added physical drama to the tension. Still, Pakistan scrapped their way to 159, a total that felt both fragile and significant.

West Indies responded with expected authority, amassing a commanding 89-run lead. But the seeds of reversal were already sown: Wasim Akram’s six-wicket burst announced his arrival as more than a prodigy — he was becoming a force. Tauseef Ahmed reinforced the attack with suffocating off-spin, denying West Indies acceleration and breathing Pakistan back into hope.

Pakistan’s Steadfast Resistance: The Fight for Survival

The second and third days belonged to grit, determination, and slow defiance. Pakistan refused to panic even after losing Mudassar Nazar and Ramiz Raja early in the second innings. They played not for speed but survival, a strategic retreat with the intention to attack later.

Salim Yousuf, sent as a night-watchman, batted with admirable calm for 61, his maiden Test fifty, while Javed Miandad and Mohsin Khan displayed monk-like patience. The scoreboard moved sluggishly, but Pakistan’s resistance gained moral ground.

Akram the Catalyst: A Young Lion Roars

Day Four tilted destiny. 

Enter Wasim Akram, the 20-year-old left-arm hurricane. His 66 was audacity in motion: sixes off Marshall and Patterson, partnerships with Tauseef and a plastered Salim Malik defying both pain and fear.

Pakistan’s lead swelled to 240, enough to create pressure, perhaps enough to dream.

The West Indies entered the chase with four sessions to play and destiny on their side… or so they believed.

The Dramatic Collapse: Qadir’s Spell of Destruction

Cricketing chaos unfolded. Imran Khan bowled with deceptive pace and accuracy and opened the gates, dismissing Haynes and Greenidge LBW, early cracks in an iron wall.

Then came the sorcerer: Abdul Qadir.

His wrist-spin, a blend of venom, artistry, and sheer audacity, reduced West Indies into startled mortals.

Larry Gomes bowled for 2

Viv Richards gone for a duck

Roger Harper for 2

Richardson, the top scorer, undone for 14

On and on it went…

West Indies crashed to 43 for 9 by stumps, their aura shattered. Next morning, Qadir finished the job, six wickets for 16 runs, a spell forged for legend. West Indies were humiliated for 53, their lowest Test score at the time and still the lowest ever recorded in Pakistan.

Akram rightfully earned Man of the Match, but Pakistan celebrated a collective triumph, of belief over fear.

Voices From the Battlefield: Reflections on a Miracle

Players from both sides later acknowledged the uniqueness of the battle:

Ramiz Raja spoke of the hunger:

“We looked at it as an opportunity to beat the best, not a reason to surrender.”

Tauseef Ahmed highlighted West Indies’ kryptonite:

“They struggled against legspin, and we had the very best.”

Richie Richardson recognized Pakistan’s fierce leadership:

“Imran Khan and his warriors were never easy. They matched our aggression.”

West Indies players, too, confessed to lapses — a lack of mental preparation and even a food-poisoning mishap that hit their captain Viv Richards. Yet, none denied Pakistan’s superior skill and intensity.

Akram’s rise, Qadir’s sorcery, and Imran’s command formed a holy trinity that brought down cricket’s most feared empire.

A Victory That Rewrote Perception

The Faisalabad Test was not just a cricket match, it was a statement.

Pakistan proved that giants can fall, that bravery can outshine fear, that belief is the beginning of all greatness.

From 1976 to 1995, West Indies lost only 19 Tests in 142 attempts but four of those losses came against Pakistan.

On that unforgettable afternoon, Pakistan didn’t just win a Test match, they made the invincibles taste defeat.

Faisalabad became a fortress of memory, and the date a reminder to the cricketing world:

Even legends can crumble when confronted by a team that refuses to bow.

Pakistan vs. Australia, 1994: A Battle of Will and Craft in Rawalpindi

Test cricket, at its finest, is a test of patience, resilience, and adaptability. It does not merely entertain—it interrogates the very essence of a cricketer’s temperament, probing for flaws and exposing weaknesses. The Pakistan-Australia series of 1994 was a case study in this enduring examination of character, where two teams, locked in transition, contested a series that would go on to shape their cricketing destinies.

The Prologue: A Shift in Leadership 

Mark Taylor had inherited the Australian captaincy from Allan Border, stepping into the shoes of a legend. The mission was clear: reclaim Australia’s dominance in Test cricket. Their ultimate goal lay months ahead—toppling the mighty West Indies in their own backyard—but before that, they had to conquer Pakistan, a fortress that had humbled many visiting teams before them.

Pakistan, too, was navigating a post-Miandad era. The void left by the street-smart genius of Javed Miandad was daunting, but the team was not short of firepower. The top order boasted the elegance of Saeed Anwar and Aamir Sohail, the promise of Inzamam-ul-Haq, and the enigmatic artistry of Salim Malik, who had been entrusted with the captaincy. Supporting them was a bowling attack feared across the cricketing world—Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis, reverse swing’s most lethal exponents, backed by the wily leg-spinner Mushtaq Ahmed.

The Karachi Test: A Study in Chaos and Brilliance

The first Test at Karachi unfolded as a classic, a battle between precision and perseverance. Wasim Akram’s eight wickets (8 for 138) and Waqar Younis’ seven (7 for 144) kept Australia in check, but David Boon’s resilient 114* was the backbone of a total that placed the visitors in command. From 171 for 2, Australia’s second innings unravelled spectacularly to 232 all out, a collapse engineered by the unrelenting reverse swing of Pakistan’s pace duo.

Pakistan’s chase of 314, however, turned into a labyrinth of despair. Shane Warne, weaving his magic on a wearing pitch, threatened to strangle the life out of the pursuit, claiming 8 for 150. At 184 for 7, Pakistan teetered on the edge of defeat. But cricket, ever the unpredictable beast, had other plans. Inzamam-ul-Haq and Rashid Latif fought with defiant resolve, adding 52 runs that breathed life into a waning chase. Mushtaq Ahmed, an unlikely hero, provided the final support as Inzamam steered Pakistan to a nerve-wracking one-wicket victory, sealing one of the most remarkable turnarounds in Test history.

The Rawalpindi Test: A Story of Redemption and Ruthlessness

With the wounds of Karachi still raw, Australia arrived in Rawalpindi determined to strike back. They introduced a debutant fast bowler named Damien Fleming, while Pakistan recalled Mohsin Kamal, once hailed as a prodigious quick but absent from the Test arena since 1987.

Malik opted to field first, trusting his bowlers to exploit early conditions. Yet, despite Wasim Akram’s gallant effort—bowling through excruciating back pain—Australia flourished. Michael Slater’s blistering 110 off 155 balls set the tone, and steady contributions from the Waugh twins, Michael Bevan, and Ian Healy propelled Australia to a commanding 521 for 9 before Taylor declared. Pakistan now faced a mountain.

Aamir Sohail’s Audacious Start, Pakistan’s Precarious Plunge

Pakistan’s response was blistering. Aamer Sohail, fearless and flamboyant, tore into the Australian attack, racing to 80 off 83 balls with exquisite strokeplay. But cricket’s equilibrium is delicate—soon, Pakistan crumbled to 198 for 8. The familiar resistance of Wasim and Waqar prolonged the innings, yet a deficit of 261 forced a humiliating follow-on.

Determined to press home the advantage, Taylor devised a ruthless plan. He had Jo Angel bowl menacing bouncers at Sohail, attempting to shake his confidence. The tactic nearly worked—Sohail mistimed a pull, the ball ballooned to Warne at deep square leg… and inexplicably, Warne spilt the chance. A lifeline had been granted.

By stumps, Pakistan had reached 324 for 2, securing a lead of 63. But the night belonged to one man—Saleem Malik.

Salim Malik’s Masterclass: An Innings for the Ages

Test cricket often bestows moments of redemption upon those who need it most, and for Malik, this was his grand reckoning. His innings was not just a counterattack—it was a statement.

Taylor, sensing the pivotal moment, had devised a plan to unsettle the Pakistani skipper. “Malik is obviously their key man,” he instructed Angel. “Let’s bowl him a good round of short ones and see how he handles them.” The first short ball after lunch had Malik fending, a thick edge carrying to Taylor at slip. The moment was there. The catch was there. And then—it wasn’t. Taylor, one of the safest hands in world cricket, had dropped him.

What followed was destruction. Malik’s first fifty came off 49 balls, laced with ten boundaries. Taylor, desperate, turned to Bevan’s part-time chinaman, but Malik was merciless, plundering 25 runs from three overs. His second fifty, though more measured, still included nine fours. When he finally drove Warne against the turn to bring up his century, the crowd erupted into applause that refused to wane.

By the time he departed for 237, Malik had orchestrated Pakistan’s resurrection. His artistry left Australia spellbound. The innings remains one of the greatest ever played by a Pakistani against Australia, a masterclass of controlled aggression and exquisite placement.

The Final Twist: Fleming’s Historic Hat-Trick

Just as Pakistan seemed untouchable, Test cricket’s penchant for drama resurfaced. Inzamam shuffled across to his first ball, was struck on the pads, and was promptly adjudged lbw. Damien Fleming, in only his second over in Test cricket, sensed an opportunity. As he ran in for his next ball, he whispered to McDermott, *“Saleem doesn’t know it yet, but he’s about to become part of Test history.”*

The delivery was perfect—a fast leg-cutter that shaped away late. Malik, on 237, reached for it, edged, and Healy gleefully accepted the catch. With that, Fleming became only the third bowler to take a hat-trick on Test debut, etching his name into cricketing folklore.

A Farcical End, A Lasting Legacy

The Test’s conclusion was almost comic. With Pakistan firmly in control, Taylor and Slater—pure batsmen—were given the ball. Each managed a wicket, their only Test scalps. Australia, facing the inevitable, extended hands in surrender. Pakistan had amassed 537, and Australia’s response was a mere formality.

Yet, beyond statistics and scorecards, this Test, much like Karachi before it, was a testament to the unpredictable beauty of the game. Australia had arrived with a point to prove, but Pakistan, fueled by resilience and artistry, had once again defied the odds.

For Saleem Malik, this was a crowning achievement. For Australia, it was a lesson in missed opportunities and relentless perseverance. For cricket, it was another chapter in the never-ending saga of triumph, heartbreak, and the eternal struggle between bat and ball. And for those who witnessed it, it was nothing short of poetry in motion.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Clash of Titans: Pakistan’s Grit and India’s Lapse in Toronto

The second One-Day International between India and Pakistan unfolded as a riveting contest of skill, temperament, and fluctuating fortunes. A game that began with uncertainty due to a damp pitch—delaying the start by thirty minutes—culminated in a dramatic Pakistani victory, orchestrated by the seasoned Salim Malik and the resolute Saqlain Mushtaq. It was a match where heroics emerged on either side, yet the absence of a roaring crowd rendered the spectacle somewhat muted.

India’s Batting Brilliance and Tactical Missteps

Opting for a familiar but debatable strategy, India persisted with Nayan Mongia as an opener, despite his prior failure. His innings was short-lived, contributing 18 before Pakistan found solace in dismissing Sachin Tendulkar early. For the young Azhar Mahmood, the dismissal of the Indian captain was nothing short of a prized moment. With two wickets down for 44, India teetered precariously. However, the ever-composed Rahul Dravid and the elegant Mohammad Azharuddin stitched together a masterful 161-run partnership, stabilizing the innings with a blend of wristy elegance and technical finesse.

Dravid’s composed 90 off 114 balls, laced with five boundaries, underscored his growing stature in international cricket. Azharuddin complemented him with an equally fluent 88, striking nine fours in his 99-ball stay. Their partnership not only provided India with a competitive total but also set a new benchmark for the highest third-wicket stand between the two nations.

However, the Indian innings was not without its concerns. Despite a solid platform, the finishing lacked aggression. Ajay Jadeja chipped in with an unbeaten 21, but Pakistan’s bowlers—especially Saqlain Mushtaq—ensured that India could not accelerate beyond 264 for six. A score deemed competitive, but far from insurmountable.

Pakistan’s Chase: A Tale of Setbacks and Comebacks

Despite losing Aamir Sohail and Ijaz Ahmed early to Venkatesh Prasad, Pakistan appeared to be in control for much of their chase. Saeed Anwar, undeterred by an injured finger, played a fluent knock of 80 off 78 deliveries, peppered with three sixes and six fours. His partnership with Inzamam-ul-Haq was pivotal, adding 71 for the third wicket before Kumble struck, sending Inzamam back for 29.

Anwar’s dismissal at the hands of Tendulkar seemed to tilt the balance in India’s favor. As wickets tumbled—including those of Moin Khan, Wasim Akram, and Azhar Mahmood—Pakistan found itself staring at defeat. India’s bowlers, however, failed to seize the moment. While Anil Kumble was economical and effective, his fellow bowlers lacked penetration. Srinath’s erratic line and Prasad’s lack of pace in the death overs proved costly.

Malik’s Masterclass and Saqlain’s Grit

Just when Pakistan’s defeat seemed imminent, the veteran Salim Malik took charge. With nerves of steel, he manipulated the field, finding gaps with precision and turning the strike over masterfully. His calculated assault on India’s weakened bowling attack was a testament to his experience. All he needed was a reliable partner, and Saqlain Mushtaq provided just that.

Despite twisting his ankle in the dying moments, Malik refused to relent. He steered the innings with unwavering composure, timing his strokes to perfection. Saqlain, typically known for his off-spin, exhibited remarkable tenacity with the bat, holding firm at the non-striker’s end. As India struggled to contain the flow of runs in the final overs, Malik capitalized, guiding Pakistan home in what turned out to be a thrilling finish.

Tactical Blunders and Missed Opportunities

Sachin Tendulkar, leading India, defended his decision to hand the final over to Sunil Joshi. Yet, one could sense that a more strategic approach was warranted. With only four frontline bowlers in his arsenal, Tendulkar was left grappling for options. Jadeja and himself were deployed as makeshift bowlers, but neither could stem the tide. As Pakistan mounted its final assault, India’s lack of firepower in the slog overs became painfully evident. The inability of Indian pacers to deliver tight spells under pressure allowed Pakistan to dictate the pace of the chase, something that could have been mitigated with better bowling rotations.

A Match to Remember

Ultimately, cricket was the true winner. While India showcased brilliance through Dravid and Azharuddin, their inability to close out the match cost them dearly. Pakistan, on the other hand, once again demonstrated their renowned resilience. Salim Malik’s masterful innings and Saqlain Mushtaq’s all-round contribution proved to be the difference. As Wasim Akram aptly put it, “I knew we could win so long as Malik was there.”

For India, it was a lesson in the art of finishing games. For Pakistan, it was a reaffirmation of their never-say-die spirit. And for cricket lovers, it was yet another enthralling chapter in the storied rivalry between these two cricketing giants. The game stood as a testament to the unpredictable nature of cricket, where a moment of brilliance or a lapse in concentration can alter the course of history. The fight, the strategy, and the emotions—this match had it all, ensuring it would be remembered for years to come.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar

Of Centuries and Shortcomings: England’s Missteps and Individual Brilliance Illuminate a Drifting Contest at Headingley

This Test never truly threatened to become a contest. From the moment England committed to an all-seam attack on a Leeds surface that asked for guile over grunt, the match fell into the slow rhythm of inevitability. Yet, amidst the strategic stumbles and the structural flatness of the game, there were islands of brilliance—four centuries that stood tall against the greyness. Ijaz Ahmed and Moin Khan for Pakistan, Alec Stewart and Nick Knight for England—each offered their own flourish to what was, in the larger picture, a meandering draw.

It was not a match remembered for its tension, but for its texture—woven through moments of individual elegance, tactical folly, and a troubling return of crowd disorder that cast a shadow over Headingley once more.

England’s Gambit: Seam Without Subtlety

The game’s first misstep came not from the pitch, but from the selection table. England, in a display of tactical rigidity, opted for four seamers—Caddick, Mullally, Lewis, and Cork—while leaving out any specialist spinner. It was an all-seam policy that smacked more of stubbornness than strategy, especially on a surface known to wear and yield to spin late in the game. Predictably, the quartet laboured under the weight of expectation, variety conspicuous by its absence. The physical burden was such that it seemed a miracle none broke down.

England's decision-makers, though, would later attempt to redeem themselves through the batting order they selected. In choosing six proper batsmen, they unlocked impressive returns. Stewart, rejuvenated in his preferred role as opener, rediscovered his old rhythm. And Knight, shunted to No. 6, responded with serenity and steel, crafting his maiden Test hundred. Even if victory remained a faint and fleeting hope, England’s batsmen earned plaudits for taming the fire and fury of Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis—whose combined six wickets came at the cost of over 200 runs.

Trouble in the Stands: A Deeper Blot on the Game

If England’s tactics left much to be desired, the behaviour of parts of the Headingley crowd offered something far worse. Again, the Western Terrace was at the centre of disgrace. Around 200 spectators were removed over two days for unruly and reportedly racist behaviour—an ugly echo of past embarrassments. Sir Lawrence Byford, president of Yorkshire and a former Chief Inspector of Constabulary, witnessed the unrest first-hand. Shaken, he acknowledged the potential loss of Headingley’s Test status should such scenes persist. He now found himself not only a witness, but a reporter—tasked with explaining Yorkshire’s failure to control its house.

Ijaz and Moin: Orchestrators of Pakistan’s Ascendancy

On the field, Pakistan played with a casual elegance underpinned by seasoned opportunism. Atherton, having won the toss, gambled against Wasim and Waqar on a green-tinged surface—and opted to bowl. For a brief spell, the plan bore fruit. Mullally removed Saeed Anwar early, and Caddick, returning to Test cricket after a two-year absence, bowled with incision and menace, troubling both Shadab Kabir and Ijaz Ahmed.

But then came the partnership that altered the rhythm of the innings. Ijaz, unbothered by the lack of spin or variety, drove and pulled with measured aggression. After the fall of Shadab and Inzamam, he settled into a stand of 130 with the experienced Salim Malik. Ijaz’s 141 was a clinical dissection of England’s limitations—crafted from 201 balls over 279 minutes, laced with 20 fours and two sixes. The first ever Test century for Pakistan at Headingley was a masterclass in poise and placement.

If Ijaz was elegant, Moin Khan was doggedly opportunistic. Drafted in last-minute due to Rashid Latif’s injury, Moin seized his moment in history. He became the first Pakistani wicket-keeper to score a century against England, but his innings was not without fortune. He was dropped thrice—on 8, 18, and 84. Still, alongside the implacable Asif Mujtaba, Moin added a record 112 for the seventh wicket. He was eventually dismissed by a resurgent Cork, but not before Russell’s catch brought up his own milestone—150 Test dismissals. Cork finished with five wickets, but it was Caddick who bowled with more heart than his three-wicket haul suggested. Mullally chipped in with two; Lewis, however, was conspicuously ineffective, conceding 100 runs without any tangible threat.

Stewart’s Symphony, Knight’s Arrival

England’s reply began with early drama. Atherton fell to a peach from Wasim, a sharp inswinger that kissed the inside edge. Yet from that moment on, the innings belonged to Alec Stewart. Batting with rare urgency, Stewart's footwork was light, his hands deft. He neutralised Pakistan’s vaunted pace pair with early timing and clarity of thought. Mushtaq Ahmed was introduced but never allowed to settle.

Stewart's century came with a punchy three off Wasim. His celebration was jubilant; the press, however, turned their attention to the subdued applause from Ray Illingworth, England's chairman of selectors, whose approval seemed half-hearted. Later, that too would become a headline.

Crawley made a breezy 53 before departing, which brought Knight to the crease. His century was the opposite of Stewart’s—a gentle crescendo built on patience and placement. The two added 108 together in just 21 overs, until Stewart, physically spent after 315 balls and 24 boundaries, misjudged a return drive and was caught off Mushtaq for a magnificent 170. He had eclipsed Ijaz’s two-day-old record for the highest score in an England-Pakistan Test at Leeds.

Rain dulled the fourth day’s rhythm, delaying play until the afternoon. Knight, undisturbed by the breaks, reached a quietly brilliant 113. England finished with 501, a lead of 53. This time, Illingworth climbed onto a chair to offer a clearer signal of his admiration—a theatrical amendment to his earlier nonchalance.

A Brief Flicker of Tension and the Fade to Grey

Pakistan’s second innings began shakily. Shadab was dropped by Stewart in the slips off Mullally and soon fell to Lewis. Cork then removed Anwar, caught behind. At 34 for two, England’s imaginations flickered with improbable visions of a late heist. But Inzamam-ul-Haq had other ideas. His authoritative 65 shut the door on any drama, and with it, the match quietly withered into a draw.

A Match of Moments, Not Meaning

In the end, this Headingley Test was less about competition than composition—of individual moments strung together in an otherwise tepid narrative. England’s misjudged selection precluded any real chance of forcing a result. Yet their batsmen emerged with reputations enhanced, and Pakistan’s middle order again displayed its enduring class.

What could have been a strategic battle became a canvas for personal excellence. And in the background, once more, the Western Terrace raised uncomfortable questions about the spirit in which this game is watched—and governed.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Pakistan’s Glorious Summer of 1987: A Triumph Beyond Cricket

Pakistan’s introduction to Test cricket was nothing short of remarkable. Despite losing their inaugural series against India in 1952 by a respectable margin of 2-1, they quickly established themselves as a formidable competitor on the global stage. Their tour of England in 1954 further cemented this reputation, as they managed to draw the series 1-1—a feat that underscored their potential. While debates persist over whether England fielded their strongest XI in every match, the broader implication was undeniable: Pakistan was a team with the capability to challenge the traditional powerhouses of the game.

Yet, the promise of their early years did not immediately translate into sustained success against England. Over the next three decades, Pakistan endured a series of setbacks, failing to secure a single series victory against their English counterparts. In ten subsequent encounters—both home and away—England triumphed in six series, while the remaining four ended in draws. A five-Test series in 1962 seemed to signal Pakistan’s growing stature, but England’s commanding 4-0 victory had the opposite effect. Subsequent series were reduced to three matches, reflecting the perception that Pakistan was yet to develop the depth required to consistently compete with the best.

During this period, Pakistan produced a handful of world-class players—most notably the legendary Hanif Mohammad and the formidable Fazal Mahmood. However, the team as a whole lacked the structural integrity to consistently challenge the elite Test nations. This dynamic began to shift in the 1980s. A narrow 2-1 series loss in England in 1982 hinted at Pakistan’s growing resilience, and by 1984, they had secured a significant 1-0 series victory at home. The cricketing world took further notice when Pakistan held the mighty West Indies to a thrilling 1-1 draw in 1986—a result that confirmed their emergence as a genuine force. England, acknowledging Pakistan’s rise, extended an invitation for a five-Test series in 1987, marking the first such engagement between the two nations in 25 years.

At the helm of this resurgent side was Imran Khan. At 34, he was considered by many to be in the twilight of his illustrious career, yet his leadership and all-round brilliance remained undiminished. First appointed captain in 1982, his tenure had been interrupted by injuries, most notably debilitating shin splints. In his absence, Javed Miandad had briefly assumed the captaincy in 1985, before Imran returned to lead Pakistan to a historic 1-0 series victory in India in early 1987. With this triumph fresh in their minds, Pakistan arrived in England that summer with quiet confidence, believing they could defy expectations.

Beyond Imran’s inspirational presence and Miandad’s batting genius, Pakistan’s squad boasted an impressive blend of youthful exuberance and seasoned experience. A young Wasim Akram, already showing glimpses of his prodigious talent, was complemented by the guile of spinners Abdul Qadir and Tauseef Ahmed. The batting order, long considered a weak link, now carried greater stability with Ramiz Raja, Shoaib Mohammad, Mudassar Nazar, Mansoor Akhtar, and Salim Malik forming a formidable top order. With a balanced squad and a sense of purpose, Pakistan stood poised to challenge England on their home soil, seeking to rewrite history and stake their claim among the cricketing elite.

England Beckons: A Tour Clouded in Controversy

Buoyed by their success in India, Pakistan set sail for England in May, embarking on a tour that would test both their resilience and their reputation. The selection committee—effectively an extension of Imran Khan’s strategic mind—made a few alterations to the squad. One omission, however, ignited an off-field storm. Qasim Umar, aggrieved by his exclusion, unleashed a barrage of allegations involving drug abuse within the team. His claims cast a shadow over the touring party, leading to an uncomfortable reception at Heathrow, where sniffer dogs were waiting for them. The scandal, though never substantiated, marked the abrupt end of Umar’s international career. 

Once on the field, Pakistan found themselves in a dogged three-match Texaco Trophy ODI series. England edged the decider at Edgbaston by a single wicket, setting the stage for an enthralling five-Test series. Both teams arrived battle-hardened, having recently vanquished their fiercest rivals—Pakistan against India, and England against Australia. The hosts, fresh from reclaiming the Ashes, were considered favourites. Yet Imran Khan, a man never shackled by preordained narratives, had other plans. 

Weathering the Storm: A Series Shaped by the Elements

Pakistan entered the first Test at Old Trafford with a squad that was far from full strength. Imran Khan, despite leading the side, was restricted to playing purely as a batsman due to a strained stomach muscle sustained just before the match. The absence of Abdul Qadir, who remained in Pakistan attending to his ailing wife, further weakened the team’s bowling arsenal. Javed Miandad, a pivotal figure in the batting lineup, arrived late on tour following the birth of his son and was consequently short of match practice. However, these setbacks ultimately proved inconsequential, as relentless rain ensured that fewer than 15 hours of play were possible over the five days, rendering the match a dampened affair.

Opting to bat first after winning the toss, England compiled a commanding total of 447, anchored by a composed and methodical 166 from opener Tim Robinson. The young Wasim Akram, celebrating his 21st birthday on the eve of the match, continued to impress, claiming 4 for 111 in what was only his 16th Test appearance. Pakistan’s response was less assured, as they stumbled to 140 for 5 before the persistent rain forced an inevitable draw.

A little over a week later, the teams reconvened at Lord’s for the second Test, where once again the weather played a decisive role. England, the only side to bat, posted 368, with Bill Athey justifying the selectors’ continued faith in him by crafting a well-earned 123. However, rain delays prolonged England’s innings until the close of play on day three, and further downpours on day four ensured that Pakistan never even had the opportunity to bat. Despite the frustrating conditions, there were silver linings for the visitors—most notably, Imran and Qadir, now reunited with the squad, managed to get valuable bowling practice, hinting at a more competitive contest ahead.

Turning the Tide at Headingley

Pakistan required only five overs and one ball on the fourth morning to formalize their victory, a swift conclusion that left England with an all-too-familiar sense of despair. It was a dismal echo of their defeat by India on the same ground a year earlier. The pitch, riddled with cracks and offering erratic bounce, drew criticism, yet England’s batsmen bore greater culpability. Of their bowlers, only Foster adapted to the conditions with precision, skillfully moving the ball both in and away, compelling the batsmen into error. His spell, a masterclass in fast-medium bowling, yielded eight wickets, a performance as commanding as Imran’s. In contrast, Dilley’s away-swing rarely troubled the batsmen, Capel’s line and length lacked menace, and Edmonds oscillated between attack and containment. England’s decision to exclude Emburey in favour of a fourth seamer, Capel, proved misguided, while Richards deputized for the French, still recovering from chickenpox. Pakistan remained unchanged.

England’s decision to bat first under a sky of high clouds and little breeze seemed sound, yet within a mere 63 minutes, they were reeling at 31 for five. The collapse was a testament not just to Pakistan’s pace and swing but to England’s technical frailties. Robinson, hesitant, fell to the third ball. Athey, playing late, perished in the seventh over. Broad, caught in indecision, succumbed in the eighth. Gatting shouldered arms to his demise, and Gower, in an ill-fated attempt to withdraw his bat, dragged onto his stumps. Imran, with figures of 7-1-16-3, was relentless; Wasim Akram, equally incisive, returned 10-4-20-2 before making way for Mudassar.

Botham, adopting a watchful approach, resisted for nearly two hours before Mudassar, having already bruised his instep—a blow that would prevent him from fielding—enticed him into an ill-judged drive at a gentle outswinger. Richards, inexplicably, left an inswinger from Wasim and paid the price. When the young left-armer tired, Mohsin Kamal stepped in, claiming three wickets in nine balls. Capel, resolute, reached a debut fifty with his sixth boundary but fell immediately after, driving a full-length delivery back to Mohsin, who plucked the return catch above his head. His innings, a study in patience and technique, lasted three hours and thirteen minutes, underscoring the value of a committed forward defence.

Pakistan, in response, faced 27 overs before stumps, during which England squandered three opportunities off Foster’s bowling. Mansoor survived two difficult chances, first to Edmonds, then to Emburey in the slips, while Yousuf, dropped the second ball, capitalized on England’s generosity, occupying the crease throughout Friday morning’s session.

Salim Malik, embodying quiet authority, orchestrated the second day’s play with an innings of discipline and refinement. His 99, compiled over five and a half hours from 238 deliveries, featured eight boundaries and was a lesson in application. His partnership of 72 with Ijaz Ahmed had already tilted the match decisively in Pakistan’s favour, and on the third morning, Ijaz and Wasim Akram extinguished any lingering English hopes. Ijaz, with audacious strokeplay, enthralled the Saturday crowd—back-foot drives behind point, a pair of dancing steps down the pitch for a straight boundary, and a flick of the wrists for a ninth four en route to his fifty. Wasim Akram’s innings, a cavalier 43 from 41 balls, was adorned with four sixes and two fours before Edmonds, sprinting in from fine leg, ended his spree with a tumbling catch.

England’s second innings unravelled almost immediately. Broad and Robinson departed in Imran’s first and second overs. Athey and Gower, displaying an air of reckless defiance, added 35 in the 38 minutes before lunch. Broad, adjudged caught behind off Imran’s second ball, was doubly unfortunate—the replay, scrutinized repeatedly, suggested the ball had merely brushed his left hand after he had withdrawn it from the bat, an injustice compounded by the wicketkeeper’s sharp reflexes. Yousuf, however, fared worse in the afternoon session when, after fumbling the ball and recovering it, he made an unsuccessful appeal for Botham’s wicket. The umpire dismissed the claim, and an incensed Botham had to be restrained by umpire Palmer, while Imran, ever the disciplinarian, reprimanded Yousuf in no uncertain terms.

With Qadir applying a vice-like grip at one end through 23 successive overs, Pakistan’s fast bowlers exploited the pitch’s fickle bounce from the Football Stand end. Imran, immaculate in his craft, claimed his 300th Test wicket with the dismissal of Richards, smartly taken at forward short leg, becoming only the eighth bowler to reach the milestone. On the fourth morning, he added three more to his tally, finishing with match figures of ten wickets. Capel, once again, exhibited resilience, batting for three hours, but England’s fate had been sealed from the moment their innings crumbled on Thursday morning. That Gatting might have made the same decision at the toss was of little solace; the execution, not the intent, had dictated England’s downfall.

A Battle of Attrition at Edgbaston

A placid Edgbaston pitch seemed destined for a tame draw from the outset, as Pakistan negotiated Gatting’s decision to bowl first with ease. Yet, the match, languid for much of its course, sprang to life dramatically after lunch on the final day, setting the stage for an improbable English victory.

An incisive spell of fast bowling from Foster, ably supported by Botham, dismantled Pakistan’s second innings with unexpected haste, leaving England with an ambitious yet attainable target of 124 from the final eighteen overs. Broad’s aggressive 30 in an opening stand of 37 off just five overs provided England with the perfect platform, and for a fleeting moment, parity in the series seemed within reach. However, Pakistan, marshalled by the relentless Imran Khan and the fiery Wasim Akram, expertly curtailed England’s charge. Unshackled by the constraints of one-day cricket—no fielding restrictions, no curbs on short-pitched bowling—Pakistan dictated terms as wickets tumbled. England, in the end, fell tantalizingly short by just 15 runs.

Both captains concurred that England, given their wealth of one-day experience, should have secured victory. Yet, it was Gatting who bore the brunt of criticism, particularly from the tabloid press, for his miscalculations in the early days of the match. He had gambled on the assumption that the prolonged spell of wet weather would render the pitch greener than usual, offering early assistance to his seamers.

Curiously, England omitted Radford from their twelve, despite his standing as the leading wicket-taker in the County Championship, opting instead for two spinners. The decision left England short of a paceman, a deficiency Pakistan exploited, amassing 250 for three by stumps on the first day. The innings was anchored by Mudassar Nazar, who compiled his ninth Test century with unwavering discipline, sharing a pivotal third-wicket stand of 135 with Javed Miandad. Miandad, reprieved on 15 when Botham spilt a straightforward chance at slip, capitalized to score 75.

Rain and bad light plagued the second day, delaying the start until 1:25 p.m. and causing several stoppages. One such interruption proved particularly farcical: umpires Whitehead and Meyer emerged from the pavilion, poised to restart play, only to be left standing alone on the square as England’s players remained oblivious in their dressing room. The miscommunication, later dissected with blame apportioned in multiple directions, was met with derision. Ultimately, the light deteriorated once more, and to the bemusement of the crowd, the umpires retreated, still without a sign of the England team.

Despite the interruptions, Dilley disrupted Pakistan’s momentum, dismissing Mudassar—after an epic vigil of nearly seven hours—along with Malik and Imran in a four-over burst. However, England failed to capitalize fully, allowing Pakistan to reach 439. A costly drop by Botham when Salim Yousuf was on 4 enabled the wicketkeeper to compile a career-best 91.

England’s response on the third day was propelled by a commanding opening stand of 119 between Broad and Robinson. The innings lost momentum in the middle phase as Imran, extracting prodigious movement, engineered yet another five-wicket haul—his 21st in Test cricket. Yet, Gatting, defying his critics, produced a defiant 124. His six-hour, 39-minute innings, punctuated by sixteen boundaries, ensured England a hard-earned 82-run advantage, aided by late-order contributions from Emburey and Foster.

Pakistan’s second innings commenced with just under an hour remaining on the fourth day, and all signs pointed towards an inevitable draw. By lunch on the final day, at 74 for one, they had nearly erased the deficit. However, Foster ignited a dramatic collapse, removing Shoaib, Mansoor, and Miandad in quick succession. Botham compounded Pakistan’s woes with a stunning return catch to dismiss Malik before clean bowling Ijaz. Yet, a crucial 13-minute break for bad light, coupled with Imran’s obdurate 37, prolonged England’s toil until the final hour.

England’s pursuit of victory was derailed by a series of run-outs, with Athey—though not solely culpable—embroiled in all of them. His inability to accelerate in the closing stages, managing a mere 14 runs in seven overs, proved costly and ultimately led to his omission from the Fifth Test.

Poor weather over the first four days restricted the attendance to 42,500, with gate receipts totaling £287,080. Thankfully, there was no repeat of the crowd disturbances that had marred the one-day international between these sides at Edgbaston in May. However, the necessity of a substantial police and stewarding presence significantly diminished the match’s profits. In the end, what had seemed a meandering contest transformed into a gripping spectacle, a testament to the unpredictable drama of Test cricket.

The Oval: Where Legends Are Forged

 Gatting and Botham’s stoic resistance on the final day provided England with a rare moment of solace in a summer of dwindling fortunes. Their unwavering defiance for over four hours ensured that Pakistan's dominance translated into only a 1-0 series victory—their first in England—rather than a more emphatic margin.

To unsettle such a formidable opponent, England needed to seize the initiative by batting first on a measured, albeit slowish, pitch. Yet fate favoured Pakistan, as Imran Khan, winning his first toss of the series, set the stage for England’s third consecutive home series defeat. By the second day’s lunch, Pakistan’s batsmen had already dictated the match’s trajectory, and by the evening of the fourth, England—following on—remained a staggering 381 runs adrift with seven wickets in hand.

Seeking fresh impetus, England replaced Athey with Moxon, ending the former’s fourteen-Test run, and once again overlooked Radford in favour of a dual-spin attack. Pakistan, meanwhile, reintroduced Ramiz Raja and Tauseef Ahmed, sidelining Shoaib Mohammad and Mohsin Kamal for the first time in the series. The early removal of Ramiz and Mansoor by Botham and Dilley hinted at an opportunity for England to exert pressure, but Javed Miandad soon dismantled their aspirations. His long-overdue maiden Test century against England was merely a prelude to a masterful double-century—his fourth in Tests—making him only the seventh batsman to achieve such a feat. Having survived a difficult chance to Foster at long leg when on 9, Miandad reached 6,000 Test runs on the first day, guided by the steady Mudassar and the flamboyant Malik. England’s cause was further weakened by injuries to Dilley (ankle) and Foster (strained side), forcing the latter out of action for the remainder of the innings.

Malik, a picture of controlled aggression, surged from 64 to the 90s early on the second day before securing his sixth Test hundred—the first outside his homeland. His innings of 237 balls, spanning over four and a half hours, contained just six boundaries yet yielded a record 234-run partnership with Miandad for Pakistan’s fourth wicket against England. Imran Khan, in what he declared to be his final Test, added another milestone by registering his first century against England, accelerating from 57 to three figures while Miandad momentarily paused his own scoring. Though Miandad harboured ambitions of challenging Sobers’ record 365 not out, fatigue overtook him, and after a marathon ten-hour vigil—facing 521 balls and striking 28 fours and a six—he offered a simple return catch to Dilley. Imran’s innings, marked by his signature audacity, ended in an attempt to snatch a fourth run off Ijaz’s stroke, bringing Pakistan’s total to 600. His innings of four and a quarter hours featured a six and eleven fours.

On the third morning, Ijaz and Yousuf extended their seventh-wicket stand to 89—a record for Pakistan against England—before Dilley’s late burst secured him a career-best six for 154. Imran’s hopes of an early declaration were dashed by deteriorating light, forcing Pakistan’s innings to reach its full, imposing length. Their final total of 708, amassed over 13 hours and 40 minutes, surpassed their previous highest of 674 for six against India in Faisalabad (1984-85) and ranked as the sixth-highest in Test history—the second largest total ever conceded by England. Botham’s figures of 217 runs conceded in 52 overs set an unenviable England record, surpassing I. A. R. Peebles’ 204 from 71 overs against Australia at The Oval in 1930.

England’s plight deepened when Broad edged behind off Imran’s fourth ball, and at 78 for four, the prospect of a humiliating defeat loomed large. Gatting’s determined half-century and Botham’s dogged support saw them through to stumps, but their task on the fourth day was formidable. Survival depended on one of them batting through the day, yet Qadir’s probing leg-spin soon exposed England’s vulnerability. Only Emburey offered any significant resistance, striking a six and six fours as Qadir tore through the lineup with his finest Test figures of seven for 96, including a devastating spell of three for 13 in 37 balls.

Following on, trailing by 476, England faced the ignominy of an unprecedented margin of defeat. That humiliation became a tangible reality when Moxon, Robinson, and Gower fell cheaply. However, on the final day, with Wasim Akram sidelined for an appendix operation, England’s resistance stiffened. Gatting’s ninth Test hundred—his fifth in fourteen matches—anchored the innings, despite a series of missed chances at 5, 23, 58, 60, and 107. His undefeated 150, compiled over five and three-quarter hours with 21 fours, stood as a testament to his resilience. Botham, suppressing his natural attacking instincts, displayed remarkable discipline, eschewing risk and ensuring England’s survival. Joining Gatting 45 minutes before lunch, he remained steadfast until the job was completed at 5:25 p.m., salvaging a draw from the wreckage of an otherwise one-sided contest.

More Than a Victory: A Statement to the World

The years that followed solidified this team's claim to being arguably the greatest Pakistan has ever produced. From early 1985 until their away loss in Australia in 1990, Pakistan remained undefeated in a Test series, a testament to their dominance on the international stage. During this period, they secured series victories over formidable opponents such as the West Indies, England, India, and Australia, while also engaging in two fiercely contested drawn series, both at home and abroad, against the West Indies. These accomplishments underscored their status as a force to be reckoned with in world cricket.

Although their 1987 World Cup campaign ended in the semifinals, it did little to diminish the team's growing reputation. Imran Khan, ever the stalwart leader, continued both his playing career and his stewardship of the side, ultimately guiding them to the pinnacle of cricketing achievement—the 1992 World Cup. His leadership, marked by both resilience and tactical brilliance, became the defining feature of Pakistan’s golden era.

The 1987 series against England, however, was not without its share of controversy. The air was thick with allegations of cheating, unsporting conduct, and complaints over umpiring decisions. While these issues were undeniably contentious at the time, they now seem secondary in the broader narrative. What remains most significant is that this series served as a crucial turning point, solidifying Pakistan’s reputation as a genuine, world-class Test cricketing nation—one that could stand toe to toe with the best in the world.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Imran Khan Blows Away England at Leeds, 1987: A Match of Skill, Strategy, and Stubbornness

In the world of Test cricket, few things are as captivating as the battle between a top-tier bowling attack and a fragile batting lineup. The Test between England and Pakistan was a prime example of this intense struggle, where the cracks in the pitch mirrored the cracks in England's approach to the game. With the ghosts of past failures haunting them, England’s batsmen crumbled under pressure, unable to cope with the conditions or the fierce Pakistan attack. 

On the other hand, Pakistan, led by the indomitable Imran Khan, displayed a masterclass in cricketing strategy and skill. From devastating pace to graceful batting, the visitors dominated every aspect of the game, taking a commanding victory that left England reeling. What unfolded was not just a match, but a statement—a clear display of Pakistan's cricketing supremacy and England’s painful shortcomings.

The fourth morning of the Test match between England and Pakistan saw a dramatic conclusion unfold. Pakistan required only five overs and a ball for victory—hardly a surprise given the state of the match. England's defeat was inevitable, but the echoes of their previous loss to India on the same ground a year earlier were impossible to ignore. The game was marked by a familiar pattern of collapse and frustration for the English side, and the state of the pitch became a focal point for much of the post-match analysis.

The pitch, which displayed cracks and had a tendency to produce erratic bounce, did not help England's cause. However, it would be unjust to entirely blame the surface for England’s catastrophic performance. The conditions were challenging, but more importantly, England’s batsmen lacked the temperament and skill required to cope with them. The blame could not solely rest with the pitch, though it offered uneven bounce, which made batting increasingly difficult as the match progressed.

Among England’s bowlers, only one stood out—Neil Foster. His ability to use the conditions to his advantage was a testament to the discipline and understanding of a bowler who could move the ball both in and out, forcing Pakistan's batsmen into uncomfortable positions. Foster’s eight-wicket haul was a rare bright spot for England. His performance mirrored that of Imran Khan’s at his peak, as both men understood how to exploit such conditions. The rest of England’s bowling attack, however, was less effective. Dilley’s away swing rarely troubled the batsmen, Capel’s line and length were ineffective, and Edmonds vacillated between attacking and containing, failing to mount consistent pressure.

The decision to omit Emburey in favor of a fourth seamer, Capel, appeared to backfire. This shift in strategy disrupted England’s balance, leaving the side without a reliable spinner in such tricky conditions. Meanwhile, Richards’ late inclusion in place of the absent French, who was recovering from chickenpox, seemed to lack the necessary cohesion that could have helped stabilize England’s position.

A Swift Collapse

The morning of the first day began with a feeling of optimism, as England had opted to bat first on a sunny morning, with high cloud and little breeze—a combination that usually favours the batsmen. However, within the first hour, England found themselves in a dire situation, standing at 31 for five. The reasons for this collapse were varied, but they all pointed to technical deficiencies and poor decision-making.

Looking closely at the dismissals, one can see the lack of application from England’s top order. Tim Robinson’s failure to get fully forward to the ball, Bill Athey’s delayed strokeplay, Chris Broad’s indecision about whether to play forward or back, Mike Gatting’s lack of response to the ball, and David Gower’s misjudgment—all contributed to the collapse. This was not merely a case of poor batting conditions; rather, it was a display of indecision, misapplication of technique, and a lack of mental fortitude.

Imran Khan, who bowled with precision and understanding of the conditions, took full advantage. His figures of 7-1-16-3 were a testament to his mastery of swing and movement off the pitch. Wasim Akram, too, was effective in his initial spell, alongside Mudassar, whose contributions further dampened England’s chances. With England’s batsmen unable to counter these skilled bowlers, their predicament only worsened. The contrasting effectiveness of Pakistan’s bowlers and the ineffectiveness of England’s batsmen could not have been more stark.

The Fall of Capel and Further Missed Chances

Amid the chaos, it was David Capel who managed to salvage a semblance of dignity for England with a solid, gritty performance. He faced Pakistan’s bowlers with a cool-headed determination, lasting for more than three hours to score a debut fifty. However, Capel’s stubborn resistance came to an end when he attempted a full-length drive and was caught by Mohsin Kamal—a catch that ended England's innings. Despite Capel’s admirable display, the rest of the team had already failed to live up to expectations, leaving Pakistan with little to fear.

However, even amid England’s collapse, Pakistan’s bowlers enjoyed some fortune. Foster’s spell was noteworthy for the missed opportunities that England failed to capitalize on. Three potential catches were put down in quick succession off Foster’s bowling, with Mansoor surviving on the first ball and then again in the 26th over. Similarly, Yousuf survived an early drop in what was a costly miss for England, who could have reduced Pakistan’s lead significantly had they taken these chances.

By the end of the second day, Pakistan had settled into a commanding position. Salim Malik, having survived his share of luck in the early stages, began to demonstrate his class. His innings of 99 runs off 238 balls, adorned with eight boundaries, were a testament to technical discipline, temperament, and patience. Malik’s steadfastness in the face of adversity began to take the game away from England. Together with Ijaz Ahmed, who contributed a quick-fire 72 runs, Malik’s presence on the crease became increasingly ominous for England.

Ijaz Ahmed and Wasim Akram: Aggression in the Face of England's Misery

The third day saw a continuation of Pakistan’s dominance. Ijaz Ahmed, who had already started to show glimpses of his attacking prowess, took his innings beyond 50 with a series of dazzling strokes. His boundary off the back foot through the slips, followed by a pair of straight drives to the boundary, demonstrated both his confidence and his ability to take on England’s bowlers. His quick-fire 72 added further frustration to the English side, and when Wasim Akram came in at the lower order, his 43 off 41 balls—laced with four sixes and two fours—further illustrated Pakistan's all-around strength.

It was during this period that England's hope for a resurgence was dealt a fatal blow. Akram’s attacking play helped to move the game beyond England’s grasp, and while Edmonds managed to dismiss him with a fine tumbling catch, it was already clear that Pakistan had taken a commanding lead. The shift from the defensive to the aggressive approach of Pakistan’s lower order only emphasized the difference in mindset and strategy between the two sides.

England’s Final Push and Imran’s Historic Achievement

With England’s morale crumbling, the final session saw Pakistan further tightening the noose. Broad and Robinson fell early to Imran’s first and second overs, and although Athey and Gower fought hard to stem the tide with a brief partnership, it became increasingly apparent that England’s fate was sealed. The mismatch between the two sides was underscored by the ongoing struggles of England’s batsmen, who seemed unable to adjust to the conditions or the pressure.

Imran Khan’s bowling was nothing short of immaculate. His 300th Test wicket, a fine catch at forward short leg, marked a historic achievement in his career and solidified his status as one of the game’s greats. He bowled with precision and discipline throughout the match, and by the fourth morning, he had captured seven wickets in the match, taking his tally to an impressive 10 for the game. His performance was a brilliant reminder of his leadership and experience, guiding Pakistan to the brink of victory.

The Final Outcome: Pakistan’s Comprehensive Victory

By the time the match drew to a close, it was clear that England’s fate had been sealed well before the final morning. The comprehensive nature of Pakistan’s performance—both with the ball and the bat—demonstrated the chasm that existed between the two teams. England’s failure to adjust to the challenging conditions, combined with their technical flaws and lack of application, made their defeat inevitable.

Pakistan, under the leadership of Imran Khan, demonstrated both tactical and technical superiority throughout the match. The contributions of players like Salim Malik, Ijaz Ahmed, and Wasim Akram added further weight to Pakistan’s dominance, while the skilful bowling from Imran, Akram, and Mudassar restricted England’s batsmen to a miserable total. Ultimately, England’s inability to adapt, combined with Pakistan’s resilience and aggression, led to a comprehensive victory for the visitors.

In the end, Pakistan’s victory was not just a product of superior cricketing ability but also a reflection of their unwavering mental strength and tactical astuteness. For England, the match served as a painful reminder of their shortcomings and the need for a serious overhaul if they hoped to compete with the very best.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Promising Series Begins in the Gloom

The Edgbaston Test between England and Pakistan opened the summer series under a shroud of rain and anticlimax. Hopes for a vibrant contest were drowned—first in water, then in a deluge of runs on an unyielding pitch. Though the match ended in a draw, it offered an evocative blend of disappointment, misjudgment, and the unmistakable aura of cricketing theatre.

Pre-Match Drama: Selection Gambles and Strategic Retreats

Before a single ball was bowled, the story had already begun to unfold off the field. Injuries to Tufnell, Lawrence, and Reeve forced England to reconfigure a successful side. The inclusion of the uncapped Munton and Salisbury, and the recalled Ramprakash, signalled both experimentation and uncertainty. The spotlight fell squarely on Ian Salisbury, a 22-year-old leg-spinner on the verge of breaking a two-decade drought for England in that art.

Captain Graham Gooch’s decision to play Salisbury was hailed as bold and necessary—until the weather intervened. The rain on the opening morning unsettled England’s nerves. In a last-minute reversal, Salisbury was dropped in favour of a safer, bat-heavy lineup. Gooch would later admit the error, as conditions did not, in the end, favour caution.

Rain, Refunds, and Recriminations

With the first two days marred by relentless downpours, cricket’s bureaucratic machinery came under fire. Only two deliveries were bowled on Friday before play was halted again, yet this brief passage counted as ‘play’ under Test and County Cricket Board rules, voiding any obligation for ticket refunds.

The result was a public relations fiasco. While 8,500 spectators received refunds on Thursday, 15,000 were denied the same on Friday. Protesters gathered, officials disappeared through side exits, and trust in the game’s administrators took a heavy blow. Later, even the Small Claims Court would side with fans, ruling the Board’s conduct unfair.

A Pitch Without Soul, A Test Without Teeth

Once the match finally resumed, it became an extended batting exhibition. Over the last three days, 902 runs were scored for the loss of just 11 wickets—a statistic that belied the supposed contest. Edgbaston’s newly laid surface offered no encouragement to bowlers; their efforts were mechanical, their spirits visibly dimmed.

Pakistan, meanwhile, showcased both youth and legacy. Debutants Aamir Sohail, Inzamam-ul-Haq, and Ata-Ur-Rehman provided promise, but it was the seasoned pairing of Javed Miandad and Salim Malik who stole the stage. Their 322-run partnership—record-breaking for either side in this fixture—was a lesson in timing, temperament, and tactical exploitation of a dead pitch.

Miandad and Malik: Masters of the Middle

Miandad, ever the wily craftsman, maneuvered the field with studied precision, reaching his 23rd Test hundred and surpassing Geoffrey Boycott as the fourth highest run-scorer in Test history. Malik, equally elegant, registered his personal best with poise and minimal fuss. Together, they silenced England’s seven-man bowling carousel, which was reduced to lifeless routines and errant deliveries.

Dropped catches and absent spin options deepened England’s woes. Gooch’s decision to omit Salisbury now appeared not just defensive but damaging. The only spin came from Graeme Hick, whose tidy but toothless off-breaks were symbolic of England’s muddled tactics.

Stewart’s Statement, and a Batting Reprieve

In reply, England faced a follow-on target reduced by rain regulations to 150. Pakistan declared at 446 for four, but England chased the psychological margin with ease, thanks in large part to Alec Stewart. The wicketkeeper-batsman produced a masterclass in fluent aggression, compiling a career-best 190 embellished with 31 boundaries.

His partnership of 227 with Robin Smith effectively secured the draw. Smith too reached three figures—his seventh Test century—all at home—but beyond them, England’s batsmen failed to press the advantage. Hick reached his first half-century in his eighth Test, but did little to silence his critics. Ramprakash was dismissed for a second-ball duck by the persevering Rehman, whose three wickets in a five-over spell briefly rekindled competitive spirit before the rain returned once more.

Innovation Unused, Potential Unfulfilled

This Test also marked a quiet innovation in the game: the first use of a third umpire in England. But with no close calls of consequence, Bob Cowper’s role was largely ceremonial—his primary challenge was staying awake.

A Draw That Spoke Volumes

The Edgbaston Test will not be remembered for its result, but for what it revealed. It laid bare England’s strategic hesitations, Pakistan’s depth of batting skill, and the inadequacies of pitch preparation and administrative foresight. It was a match shaped more by what didn’t happen—no competitive bowling, no meaningful declarations, no dramatic finales—than what did.

Yet even in anticlimax, Test cricket found ways to provoke thought, stir debate, and write stories between the raindrops.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Wasim Akram's Hat-Trick Seals Pakistan's Historic Retention of the 1990 Austral-Asia Cup

The 1990 Austral-Asia Cup final remains one of the most iconic moments in Pakistan's cricketing history, marked by the brilliance of Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis, two of the most lethal fast bowlers to ever play the game. This edition of the tournament was special not only because it represented Pakistan's defence of their title, but also due to the fierce competition they faced from an Australian team that was riding high on a streak of unbeaten matches. Pakistan’s eventual triumph in this match would be a testament to their grit, their depth in fast bowling, and their capacity to rise to the occasion in high-pressure situations.

Prelude to the Final: A Team in Form

The 1990 edition of the Austral-Asia Cup was an exciting build-up for Pakistan, who entered the tournament as defending champions. Their journey to the final was nothing short of spectacular, with a dominant run in the group stages, leading them to the semi-finals in impressive fashion.

In the semi-final, Pakistan faced New Zealand, a team that was often the bridesmaid, never the bride, when it came to major tournament victories. Pakistan’s bowling attack, spearheaded by Waqar Younis, was simply too much for the Kiwis to handle. Waqar, in particular, was on a tear, claiming a remarkable five-wicket haul as New Zealand was dismissed for just 74 runs. Waqar's performance raised his wicket tally to 15 for the tournament, cementing his status as one of the most feared fast bowlers in the world.

As remarkable as Waqar's spell was, it was only the warm-up for what was to come in the final. Pakistan’s fast bowlers had set the tone, and now the stage was set for the grand spectacle that would unfold in the final against Australia.

The Final: A Battle of Titans

On the day of the final, Imran Khan’s Pakistan faced an Australian team captained by the indomitable Allan Border. Australia came into this final with an impeccable record of ten straight victories, a streak that had earned them the title of being one of the most dominant teams of the era. With Pakistan having won the previous edition of the tournament, expectations were high for the defending champions, but they were about to face an Australian side brimming with confidence and talent.

Pakistan won the toss and chose to bat, which seemed logical given the placid nature of the wicket. The team’s opening batsman, Saeed Anwar, set the tone early with a solid 40 runs off 36 balls. His technique and aggression allowed Pakistan to get off to a decent start, but it was the middle-order contribution of Saleem Malik that truly propelled the team forward. Malik, with his patient 87 off 114 balls, brought stability to the innings when Pakistan seemed to be in danger of losing the plot. However, Carl Rackemann, the Australian fast bowler, had other ideas. He picked up three crucial wickets, reducing Pakistan to 179 for six, and suddenly the defending champions were staring at the prospect of a below-par total.

Wasim Akram: The Unlikely Hero

As Pakistan’s innings faltered, all hope seemed to rest on the broad shoulders of Wasim Akram, one of the finest all-rounders the game had seen. Akram, who had been a key figure in Pakistan's title-winning campaign in 1986, was expected to be the one who would turn the tide. And he did so in spectacular fashion.

Wasim's 49 not out from just 35 balls was a match-changing knock that breathed new life into Pakistan’s innings. His aggressive stroke play and calculated risks, along with his unbroken partnership of 59 runs for the eighth wicket with Mushtaq Ahmed, ensured that Pakistan would have a competitive total to defend. By the time Pakistan’s innings closed at 266 for seven, Akram had not only ensured a fighting total, but also given his bowlers something to bowl at—a challenging but achievable target.

Australia’s Response: A Fight Back, But Pressure Builds

Australia’s chase began steadily, with openers David Boon and Mark Taylor putting on 62 for the first wicket. The Australian batting lineup was strong, but Pakistan’s bowlers were in no mood to relent. Waqar Younis, who had been in scintillating form throughout the tournament, broke the partnership by dismissing Taylor, and then made it two in two by sending Dean Jones back for a duck. In the space of two overs, Australia found themselves at 64 for three, with Pakistan's bowlers tightening their grip on the game.

Waqar's deadly deliveries were followed by the spin wizardry of Mushtaq Ahmed. The leg-spinner, known for his deceptive flight and sharp turns, ran through Australia’s middle order. His intervention left Australia reeling at 207 for seven, still requiring 59 runs for victory. The game seemed to be slipping away from them, yet the determined pairing of wicketkeeper Ian Healy and lower-order batsman Mervyn Hughes resisted. Their 23-run partnership for the eighth wicket brought Australia to 230, just 33 runs away from victory

The Turning Point: Wasim Akram's Hat-trick

With the pressure mounting and Australia’s hopes hanging by a thread, it was Wasim Akram who once again rose to the occasion. Akram, who had earlier provided the crucial runs with the bat, was brought back into the attack to finish the job with the ball. What followed was nothing short of a masterclass in fast bowling.

In his ninth over, Akram had Hughes caught behind, a superb delivery that left the Australian wild-swinging and missing as the ball uprooted the stumps. The match had taken another dramatic turn. Akram was just one wicket away from a remarkable achievement—his second ODI hat-trick in six months.

The next delivery saw Carl Rackemann, in the thick of the chase, undone by a peach of a delivery from Akram. The ball pitched on a length and angled into the right-hander, leaving Rackemann helpless as it breached his defence and shattered the stumps.

Akram, fired up and determined to close out the game, had his hat-trick delivery next. He bowled a full-length delivery to Terry Alderman on leg stump, and the Australian batsman, attempting to cut the ball, was unable to get his bat down in time. The ball clattered into the stumps, and Wasim Akram had done it—he had completed his second hat-trick in a matter of months, a feat that would further elevate his status as one of the finest fast bowlers of all time.

Victory Secured: Pakistan Retain the Title

Akram’s hat-trick sealed the deal for Pakistan. They had triumphed by 33 runs, clinching their second consecutive Austral-Asia Cup title. The victory was a testament to the strength of Pakistan’s fast bowling attack, the resilience of their players, and the tactical acumen of Imran Khan as captain.

In the end, it was the combination of Wasim Akram’s batting and bowling brilliance, Waqar Younis’s fiery spells, and the collective effort of the entire team that ensured Pakistan’s triumph. This final, with its twists and turns, became a legendary chapter in the annals of Pakistan’s cricketing history and cemented the 1990 Austral-Asia Cup as one of the most memorable tournaments in the sport’s rich legacy.

Akram's second ODI hat-trick, achieved in the same venue where he had made history months earlier, was a fitting crowning moment to a victory highlighting Pakistan’s immense talent and never-say-die attitude. The triumph would echo in the hearts of cricket fans for years to come, as it epitomized the unpredictability and drama that make the sport so enthralling.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar