Pakistan Cricket: Between Hope and Heartbreak

An ICC event in Pakistan was once unthinkable. A nation burdened with relentless setbacks since the dawn of the 21st century has never ceased to push forward. Pakistan, in its resilience, has turned survival into an art form, and its people have redefined perseverance. Cricket, in the grand scheme of their struggles, may not be the most pressing concern. Yet, the sport has endured, surviving where logic suggested it would perish. Decades of isolation following the tragic events in Lahore created a lost generation—one that grew up watching their national team play in foreign lands. And yet, cricket never abandoned Pakistan, just as Pakistan never abandoned cricket. After 29 years, an ICC event returns to its soil, albeit in a hybrid model, because the financial overlords of the sport deemed Pakistan unworthy of a full embrace.

But what of Pakistan, the team? Even their most passionate supporters do not expect them to rival the clinical efficiency of Australia, the strategic might of England, or the calculated dominance of New Zealand. They do not seek trophies or domination—they crave improvement, fight, and a return to their proud heritage of unpredictability. Yet, their wishes remain unfulfilled, their expectations met with heartbreak more often than triumph. The structural weaknesses of Pakistan’s cricketing ecosystem are exposed time and again—an inconsistent domestic system, fragile player development, and administrative instability all contribute to the team’s stagnation.

The opening match of the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 was supposed to be a homecoming, a statement of revival. And for a fleeting moment, it seemed as though Pakistan had seized the narrative. A leg-spinner producing a carrom ball dismissal. A young fast bowler removing one of the world’s best batters. The dream was taking shape. But then, reality set in. Will Young batted as though he were playing against a club team, while Tom Latham anchored, and Glenn Phillips ensured Pakistan’s misery was complete. The lack of a clear bowling strategy, especially in the middle overs, highlighted Pakistan’s persistent tactical shortcomings.

A total of 320 on a surface with just enough variable bounce to keep bowlers interested should have been a competitive challenge. But then, Pakistan batted—or did they? They were present, in uniform, holding bats, but their innings only truly began after the 18th over. By then, the chase was already slipping away, like sand through desperate fingers. Expecting to chase down 321 with a self-inflicted handicap is not optimism; it is delusion. The lack of intent in the powerplay overs, a recurring issue for Pakistan, continues to undermine their chances in modern white-ball cricket. While the world embraces aggressive play and high strike rates, Pakistan remains shackled by outdated approaches.

Somewhere, Babar Azam is still playing out dot balls, eternally waiting for his moment to attack. His inability to accelerate under pressure, while technically gifted, reflects a deeper issue within Pakistan’s batting philosophy. The absence of a structured middle-order approach exacerbates the problem, often leaving too much for too few at the death.

While most New Zealand batters struggled, Young’s innings appeared effortless, a masterclass in quiet destruction. He never imposed himself with brute force; rather, he glided through the innings while those around him floundered. And when Pakistan had the new ball, it was anything but menacing. Mohammad Rizwan, ever the dramatist, made every delivery seem like a landmine, though his presence was only necessitated by Fakhar Zaman’s back injury.

New Zealand’s fielding was surgical in its precision. A tight backward point, an aggressive point fielder in the circle, and an advanced cover point made Pakistan’s offside strokes redundant. Every firm push met an immovable Kiwi, every well-timed shot found an agile hand. Glenn Phillips, a cricketer molded for moments like these, provided a fielding masterclass before pulling off a breathtaking catch—a left-handed stunner that typified Pakistan’s plight.

Pakistan’s chase of 321 was already a distant dream by the tenth over—22 for 2. Fakhar Zaman arrived too late to make a difference, his 24 off 41 a mere footnote in an innings that never found its rhythm. Rizwan and Babar, the twin pillars of Pakistan’s batting, once again looked for redemption but found only frustration. Khushdil Shah and Salman Ali Agha provided sparks, but in isolation, sparks do not ignite a blaze.

The structural flaws in Pakistan’s cricketing setup demand urgent attention. A reactive approach to team selection, inconsistent leadership, and tactical rigidity hinder progress. While talent is abundant, the pathways to nurture and harness it remain flawed.

Defeat was never in question—it was merely a matter of time.

New Zealand, ever clinical, continued their fine run in Pakistan. The hosts, meanwhile, remain trapped in a familiar cycle of hope and despair, knowing that improvement is imperative but never quite knowing how to achieve it. Until systemic changes are made, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between moments of brilliance and prolonged mediocrity, never quite bridging the gap between nostalgia and reality.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

The 1999 Kolkata Test: A Clash of Cricket, Controversy, and Chaos

Cricket has long been intertwined with history, politics, and the raw emotions of millions. Nowhere is this truer than in the enduring rivalry between India and Pakistan, where a single game can be both a sporting contest and a geopolitical flashpoint. The events of the Kolkata Test in February 1999—originally intended as the crowning fixture of a highly anticipated series—became a symbol of how sport can both unify and divide, enthral and enrage, captivate and combust.

It was a match that showcased Test cricket in all its dramatic beauty—breathtaking bowling spells, magnificent batting displays, and an ebb and flow that kept both players and spectators on edge. Yet, it was also a match overshadowed by controversy, marred by crowd unrest, and completed in an eerie, near-empty stadium that bore silent witness to the storm unfolding.

A Tour Precariously Balanced on the Edge of Politics

Even before a single ball had been bowled, the 1999 Pakistan tour of India teetered on uncertain ground. The political climate between the two nations was tense, as it often was, with cricket being wielded as both a bridge and a battleground. There were voices—some loud, some insidious—that sought to leverage the tour for nationalist posturing. Ultimately, after much diplomatic manoeuvring, the series was allowed to proceed, but only at the eleventh hour.

The Kolkata Test, initially scheduled as the third and final encounter of the series, was elevated to an even grander status—the inaugural match of the newly conceived Asian Test Championship. If anything, this only heightened the stakes.

The public, undeterred by the political undercurrents, responded with unbridled enthusiasm. Eden Gardens, a coliseum of cricketing passion, was packed to capacity. Over the first four days, 100,000 spectators flooded the stands—a record-breaking figure that eclipsed a six-decade-old milestone. Even on the final day, when India's hopes hanging by a thread, 65,000 loyalists remained, clinging to the belief that their team could script an improbable victory.

But as fate would have it, the battle that played out was not just between bat and ball, but also between raw passion and the very spirit of the game.

An Unraveling Masterpiece

For three days, the contest unfolded like a classic Test match, oscillating between domination and defiance.

India had dramatically seized the early momentum. On the first morning, Pakistan's innings tottered on the brink of collapse at a staggering 26 for 6. Javagal Srinath, a craftsman of seam and swing, was at his devastating best. But amidst the ruins, Moin Khan stood resilient. His counterattacking 70 ensured Pakistan reached 185—a total that still left them gasping but not entirely buried.

The crowd's hunger for an Indian masterclass was palpable, yet it was met with a gut-wrenching moment. Shoaib Akhtar, the Rawalpindi Express, came steaming in, and in an instant, the roar of expectation turned into a stunned silence. A searing yorker, a perfect symphony of speed and precision, rattled Sachin Tendulkar’s stumps first ball. The heartbeat of Indian cricket was gone without scoring. Eden Gardens, a cauldron of deafening support, was momentarily mute.

India eked out a narrow first-innings lead, and then came the counterpunch. In one of the greatest innings played on Indian soil, Saeed Anwar batted with an elegance that defied the carnage around him. He carried his bat for an unbeaten 188, a lone sentinel guiding Pakistan to 316. It was a statement of intent. India now needed 279 for victory—gettable, but by no means easy.

By the fourth afternoon, India seemed well on course. At 143 for 2, with Tendulkar at the crease, the script was aligning for a memorable triumph. And then, the match veered into the realm of the surreal.

The Run-Out That Ignited the Fire

Tendulkar, in full command, worked Wasim Akram to deep midwicket and set off for three runs. It was a routine moment, one among thousands in the game. But then, the extraordinary happened.

As he turned for the third, his path crossed that of Shoaib Akhtar, stationed near the stumps to field a potential return. Tendulkar, his eyes fixed on the ball, collided with Shoaib, momentarily losing balance. Even as he stretched towards the crease, the throw from the deep crashed into the stumps.

The moment hung in the air, pregnant with uncertainty. It was the first series officiated entirely by neutral umpires, and the decision was referred upstairs. After a long, agonizing delay, third umpire KT Francis ruled Tendulkar out.

The reaction was instantaneous, visceral. Boos cascaded down the stands. Chants of "cheat, cheat" reverberated around Eden Gardens. Bottles, plastic cups, and anything within reach were hurled onto the field. Shoaib Akhtar, now the villain in the crowd’s eyes, bore the brunt of the fury.

Play was suspended. As tensions boiled over, it took an appeal from Tendulkar himself—accompanied by ICC President Jagmohan Dalmiya—to pacify the crowd and resume the match. But the equilibrium had been shattered.

When play restarted, India collapsed in a daze. Rahul Dravid, the bedrock of the chase, fell almost immediately. Mohammad Azharuddin and Nayan Mongia followed in quick succession. By stumps, the hosts teetered at 214 for 6, still 65 runs adrift.

A Game Finished in Silence

The final morning promised drama, but what followed was pandemonium. When Sourav Ganguly perished to the ninth ball of the day, the crowd erupted in renewed fury.

Newspapers were set ablaze. Stones, fruit, and bottles rained down. The match halted again. This time, the authorities responded with force. Over the next three hours, police and security personnel cleared the stands, using lathis to drive out the 65,000 spectators. Elderly men, women, children—no one was spared the chaotic exodus.

When play resumed, Eden Gardens, once a pulsating fortress, was now a hollowed-out shell. A mere 200 people remained to watch the final rites. It took Pakistan just 10 balls to wrap up victory, but the atmosphere was unrecognizable. Where there should have been celebration or despair, there was only emptiness.

The Fallout: A Cricketing Tragedy

What should have been a celebration of Test cricket’s finest attributes had instead descended into farce. Dalmiya, initially dismissive of the disturbances, later condemned the events in strong terms, decrying the "unjustified and uncalled for" behaviour of the spectators.

For Pakistan, the triumph was bittersweet. Their captain, Wasim Akram, directed his ire at the Indian media, accusing them of fanning the flames of controversy. "You have said that Shoaib obstructed Sachin from making his ground and that I should have recalled him," he snapped. "Why should I? If a team collapses over one moment, that is our bonus."

For India, the fallout was even harsher. Azharuddin, weary and disillusioned, offered a quiet lament: "We are human beings. We can fail. But every time we cannot win."

Yet, perhaps the most tone-deaf remark came from Dalmiya himself, who, despite the chaos, tried to spin a triumphant conclusion:

"The game was finished, and cricket was the winner."

But was it?

If anything, the Kolkata Test of 1999 exposed the uneasy undercurrents beneath the game’s surface—the delicate balance between passion and provocation, adulation and anarchy. It was a match where the cricket was brilliant, the emotions volatile, and the end unsettling.

A Test match had been played. A spectacle had unfolded. And yet, in the silence of an emptied Eden Gardens, cricket had lost something.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

The 1986 England Tour of the West Indies: A Study in Ruthless Dominance and Utter Defeat

Cricket is a game of skill, patience, and mental resilience, but at times, it also becomes a display of sheer physical and psychological warfare. Some series are remembered for their balance, for the ebb and flow of competition, and for the heroics of both sides. Others, however, are one-sided massacres—tours where one team arrives with hope and departs in humiliation.

The 1986 England tour of the West Indies was such a tour, and its infamy remains unmatched. Over the course of five Tests, England—an established cricketing nation with proud traditions and accomplished players—was reduced to a mere shadow of itself. It was not just a defeat but an utter dismantling. The West Indies did not just win—they annihilated, outclassed, and bullied their opponents in a manner rarely seen in cricket history.

While Australia, in their own era of dominance (1995–2007), would go on to achieve 14 clean sweeps, the West Indies managed only two during their golden era—both against England. This fact alone speaks volumes about the psychological and cricketing mismatch between the two sides.

England’s 1986 experience was, in the words of cricket historian Rob Steen, nothing short of a “slaughter.”

The Build-up: Misplaced Optimism

In the lead-up to the series, England had reason for cautious optimism. The previous summer, they had reclaimed the Ashes with a 3-1 series win over Australia, and in the winter, they had defeated India 2-1 on Indian soil. Victories in Australia and India were historically difficult to achieve, and David Gower’s men believed they could put up a fight against the mighty West Indies.

However, their confidence ignored one fundamental reality: no team, no matter how well prepared, could truly brace itself for what awaited in the Caribbean in the 1980s. The West Indies were not just the best side in the world; they were arguably the most dominant team cricket had ever seen. Their battery of fast bowlers, their intimidating presence, and their unrelenting aggression had already dismantled stronger teams than England.

Moreover, England’s squad was carrying its own baggage. Several key players, including Graham Gooch, had been part of the controversial rebel tours to South Africa. This created tension not just within the dressing room but also among the West Indian public, who viewed these players with disdain. The political undercurrents only added to England’s woes.

And then, there was the issue of leadership. Gower, a naturally elegant batsman but a somewhat reluctant and passive captain, was about to face his most harrowing challenge. His team was about to be tested in a manner no England side had ever been before.

The Horror Begins: Sabina Park’s First Salvo

If England believed they had any chance of success, the first One Day International at Sabina Park shattered that illusion.

It was here that one of the most horrifying incidents of the tour took place. Mike Gatting, a tough, fearless batsman, had his nose smashed by a brutal Malcolm Marshall delivery. The ball, short and venomous, rushed at Gatting before he could react. It crashed into his face, leaving him bloodied and dazed. The impact was so severe that a fragment of his nasal bone was later found embedded in the ball.

The image of Gatting walking off, his face a mask of blood, was a chilling warning of what was to come. The West Indies won the match comfortably, but the real damage was psychological.

Gatting later admitted that, while he had always accepted the risk of injury, this blow was different. It left a lasting mark—not just on his face but on England’s confidence. Even his eventual return for the final Test in Antigua was an act of defiance rather than a sign of recovery.

As for the West Indies, they were only just getting started.

Patrick Patterson: A Force of Nature

By the time the first Test began, again at Sabina Park, England were already on the back foot. What followed was nothing short of carnage.

While the West Indies had built their reputation on a fearsome quartet of fast bowlers—Holding, Garner, Croft, and Marshall—by 1986, the attack was evolving. Holding and Garner were nearing the end of their careers, and Colin Croft had been banned for joining the South African rebel tours. But if England thought they would face a less formidable attack, they were in for a brutal awakening.

Patrick Patterson, a young and raw Jamaican speedster, was unleashed.

If sheer pace had a face, it was Patterson’s. According to Michael Holding, Patterson bowled faster than anyone else in that series. He generated outswing at speeds nearing 100 mph, producing deliveries that defied logic and shattered technique.

John Woodcock of The Times later wrote that he had “never felt it more likely that [he] would see someone killed on the pitch.”

Even Allan Lamb, a batsman renowned for his skill against pace, struggled against Patterson. One delivery climbed off a length and struck the shoulder of his bat, flying over the boundary for six. England’s batsmen were not just being dismissed; they were being physically overwhelmed.

Roger Harper, standing in the slips, recalled how deep the fielders had to stand. “We were so far back that we could almost spit over the boundary.”

By the end of the Test, England had been pulverized. Patterson had signaled his arrival, and West Indies had reaffirmed their status as the undisputed kings of world cricket.

A Procession of Defeats

From that point onward, the series followed a grimly predictable pattern.

England’s batting was a collective disaster. In ten innings, they failed to cross 200 on eight occasions. No player scored a century. No batsman averaged 40. It was not just that they lost—it was how feeble they looked in the process.

The West Indian pacers, as they had done for years, made batting a terrifying ordeal. Marshall, Holding, Walsh, and Patterson were relentless. The bowlers hunted in packs, feeding off each other’s energy, targeting not just wickets but the very confidence of their opponents.

By contrast, England’s bowlers were rendered impotent. The West Indies lost only five second-innings wickets in the entire series, a statistic that highlights just how unchallenged their batsmen were.

Viv Richards: The Final Insult

If the tour was a nightmare, then the final Test in Antigua was its cruelest chapter.

Viv Richards, the king of Caribbean cricket, decided to end the series in fitting fashion. In a brutal onslaught, he blazed his way to the fastest Test hundred of the time—off just 56 balls.

It was an innings that transcended the match itself. Richards was not just batting; he was making a statement. England’s bowlers, demoralized and broken, had no answer. Ian Botham, in a desperate move, positioned Lamb on the boundary in an attempt to counter Richards’ hook shots. But the plan was futile. The ball simply kept sailing over Lamb’s head, disappearing into the stands.

David Gower later admitted that there was nothing England could do. Richards was too good, too dominant.

The Aftermath: A Defeat Like No Other

England’s history is littered with humiliating tours, but the 1986 "Blackwash" stands alone.

Unlike their Ashes whitewashes, where they at least managed to reach 300 in some innings, this series was a complete annihilation. There was no moment of hope, no silver lining.

West Indies, at their peak, were an unstoppable force. England, by contrast, were a team that lacked belief, skill, and resilience. They left the Caribbean not just beaten but broken.

David Gower, years later, would admit that he tries not to think about that tour. And who could blame him? The 1986 West Indies tour remains one of cricket’s most complete demolitions—a brutal, unrelenting, and unforgettable example of sporting dominance.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Saeed Anwar: From Despair to Redemption at Eden Gardens

In cricket, as in life, the line between brilliance and failure is razor-thin. One moment, a batsman is a master of his craft, commanding bowlers with effortless grace; the next, he is a shadow of himself, struggling to reclaim the magic that once came naturally. Saeed Anwar, Pakistan’s most elegant opener of the 1990s, experienced both extremes during the high-voltage India-Pakistan Test series of 1999.

Before the tour, Anwar’s confidence brimmed with the arrogance of a master in form. He openly expressed his desire to notch a triple century, a feat that would cement his dominance over Pakistan’s fiercest rivals. The expectation was not misplaced. Two years earlier, he had tormented India in Chennai with a sublime 194, an innings of such ethereal beauty that it remains etched in cricketing folklore. His overall record against India was staggering, a testament to his penchant for delivering on the grandest stage.

More recently, in 1998, he had further solidified his status as an all-condition batsman. A polished 118 against the formidable South African pace quartet of Allan Donald, Shaun Pollock, Lance Klusener, and Jacques Kallis at Durban underscored his adaptability. Later that year, in a home series against Australia, he amassed 290 runs at an average of 96.66, including two masterful centuries. In the first Test at Rawalpindi, he stitched together a crucial 120-run ninth-wicket partnership with Mushtaq Ahmed, saving Pakistan from complete collapse.

Anwar was in prime form. His class was undisputed. But cricket has a way of humbling even the greatest.

A Series of Self-Doubt: The Collapse of a Titan

As the much-anticipated series against India began, Anwar, the artist with a bat, found his canvas barren. The rhythm that had once defined his game was absent, the fluidity of stroke-making replaced by hesitation. His high hopes of a historic series were quickly dashed as he struggled in the first two Tests, failing to impose himself. Each dismissal chipped away at his confidence, instilling the kind of self-doubt that can cripple even the finest of batsmen.

Then came the Asian Test Championship opener at Eden Gardens—one of the grandest stages in world cricket, a venue soaked in history, where the pressure of a Pakistan-India encounter is magnified by the presence of 85,000 fervent spectators. The cauldron of Kolkata was no place for the uncertain. It demanded resolve, brilliance, and a touch of defiance.

But for Pakistan, the match began in disaster.

Eden Gardens: A Cauldron of Humiliation

Batting first, Pakistan suffered a collapse so dramatic that it seemed destined for the record books. Within the first ten overs, they were reduced to 26 for six, their worst-ever start in a Test innings. The Eden Gardens crowd erupted in joy, relishing every Pakistan wicket that tumbled. The humiliation was compounded by their taunts directed at Javed Miandad, the Pakistani coach, who had recently called for drastic changes to the team in the wake of the ongoing match-fixing scandal.

Amidst the ruins, Anwar walked to the crease, burdened by expectation but devoid of form. Twelve balls later, he trudged back to the pavilion—a duck against his name. Pakistan's innings ended at a paltry 185, their pride shattered, their spirits crushed.

India, in response, looked poised to take a commanding lead. At 147 for two, they were cruising. Then, in a moment of sheer brilliance, the match flipped on its head. Shoaib Akhtar, raw, ferocious, and unstoppable, produced a spell that would be remembered for years. He bowled Rahul Dravid with a searing yorker and, in the very next delivery, shattered Sachin Tendulkar’s stumps with an express in-swinger. The twin strikes stunned the Eden Gardens crowd into silence. India collapsed, folding for 223, managing only a slender 38-run lead.

The game, once lopsided, was now alive.

Anwar’s Redemption: A Masterpiece Amidst Ruins

Pakistan’s second innings began with trepidation. Wajahatullah Wasti, pushed up the order to his natural opening position, departed early. The tension on the field mirrored that in the stands. An altercation between Prasad and nightwatchman Saqlain Mushtaq further fueled the already volatile atmosphere. South African umpire David Orchard was forced to intervene, warning India’s wicketkeeper, Nayan Mongia, for excessive appealing.

Amidst the chaos, Anwar survived a massive stroke of luck. On just two, he edged Srinath to first slip, where Mohammad Azharuddin got both hands to the ball—only to let it slip through. It was a moment of reprieve that would alter the course of the match.

The next morning, a different Anwar emerged. The hesitancy that plagued him earlier dissipated. His bat, once tentative, now met the ball with certainty. The initial movements were precise, the stroke play crisp, the footwork assured. It was vintage Saeed Anwar—fluid, elegant, and composed.

Teaming up with Mohammad Yousuf, he steered Pakistan towards stability. Their fourth-wicket stand of 115 in little over two hours frustrated India, sapped their energy, and pushed the hosts onto the defensive. The once-dominant Kumble, fresh off his historic 10-wicket haul in Delhi, looked ordinary. His final figures of one for 138 were a stark contrast to his previous heroics.

But Pakistan, true to their mercurial nature, found a way to self-destruct. From a promising 262 for three, they crumbled once more, losing their last seven wickets for just 54 runs. Yousuf’s dismissal—hooking Srinath straight to fine leg—triggered another collapse. The fragility of Pakistan’s middle and lower order was exposed yet again.

A Lone Warrior in the Storm

Yet through all the chaos, Saeed Anwar remained unshaken. He played with the fluency and grace that had once defined him. The drives through cover, the effortless cuts, the delicate flicks off his pads—every stroke was a reminder of his class. More than half his runs came behind the wicket, a testament to his immaculate timing and shot selection.

When the innings ended, Anwar stood unbeaten on 188, having carried his bat through—a feat only two Pakistanis before him, Nazar Mohammad and Mudassar Nazar, had achieved. His score accounted for 60% of Pakistan’s total of 316, a staggering individual contribution in a Test match of such intensity.

Though Younis Khan would later surpass this record with a 267 in Bangalore in 2005, Anwar’s innings at Eden Gardens remained one of the finest ever played by a Pakistani batsman on Indian soil. What made it legendary was not just the runs but the circumstances under which they came.

From the humiliation of a first-innings duck to the artistry of his second innings, Anwar’s performance was a tale of redemption, resilience, and sheer class. It was the story of a batsman who, when faced with doubt and adversity, rediscovered his greatness and answered his critics with his bat.

In the grand narrative of India-Pakistan cricket, where emotions run high and history is written in moments of brilliance, Anwar’s 188* stands as a testament to the power of perseverance. It was poetry in motion, a symphony of batsmanship that turned despair into triumph.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

The Dawn of a New Storm: Shoaib Akhtar’s Arrival on the Grand Stage

The year 1998 was one of transformation for Pakistan cricket. The golden generation of fast bowlers—Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis—was no longer at its devastating best as injuries, age, and off-field distractions took their toll. Wasim, Pakistan’s premier left-arm magician, had endured a difficult period marred by injuries and external controversies. Waqar, the other half of the legendary “Two Ws,” found himself burdened with leading the pace attack, a responsibility that had once been equally shared.

Though Waqar remained a formidable bowler, he was not the same force of nature that had terrorized batsmen in the early 1990s. His searing pace had diminished, and his pinpoint accuracy—once his hallmark—became inconsistent. As the 1998 season progressed, Pakistan cricket found itself at a crossroads, seeking the right balance between experience and renewal.

When Wasim Akram was reinstated as Pakistan’s captain in late 1998, replacing Aamir Sohail, he inherited not just a team but an era in transition. His first major challenge was a historic series in India, a contest brimming with political, emotional, and sporting intensity.

For the first time, Indian crowds would witness the fabled “Two Ws” in their own backyard, as they prepared to take on the great Sachin Tendulkar. Wasim, rejuvenated, met expectations with his spellbinding swing and tactical brilliance. But Waqar struggled. Apart from one fiery spell in the second innings of the Chennai Test, his impact was minimal. His speed had dropped, his radar was inconsistent, and his aura of intimidation had begun to fade.

As the teams moved to Kolkata for the inaugural Asian Test Championship, Wasim Akram faced a defining moment. Sentiment and loyalty pointed towards persisting with Waqar. But Pakistan cricket had always been ruthless in its pursuit of success. And so, a bold decision was made—Waqar Younis, one of Pakistan’s greatest fast bowlers, was dropped.

In his place, a raw, untested force was unleashed upon the world: Shoaib Akhtar.

The Wild Card Enters the Arena

At the time, Shoaib Akhtar was an enigma—a talent largely unknown to the wider cricketing world but a name whispered among Pakistan cricket circles. His reputation, however, extended beyond his cricketing ability. He was a free spirit, a restless maverick who had already gained notoriety for his off-field antics.

During Pakistan A’s 1997 tour of England and South Africa, Shoaib had made headlines for breaking curfews and indulging in the night-time thrills of the Western world. He spent the previous summer playing club cricket in Ireland, returning with a passable Dublin accent and an endless stream of stories from O’Connell Street’s pubs.

But beyond the theatrics, Shoaib possessed something extraordinary—raw, untamed pace.

The cricketing world had caught glimpses of his ability during Pakistan’s Test series in South Africa earlier in 1998. In the second Test at Durban, Shoaib delivered a match-winning spell, helping Pakistan secure a rare victory. His thunderbolts drew comparisons with Allan Donald, South Africa’s premier fast bowler. Wasim Akram, who had faced both, made an emphatic declaration:

"Waqar was as fast in his heyday, but Shoaib’s bouncer is much quicker."

Yet, despite these promising flashes, Shoaib remained untested on the biggest stage. That was about to change.

Kolkata’s Eden Gardens, one of cricket’s most electrifying venues, was about to witness the birth of a new phenomenon.

Setting the Stage for an Earthquake

Day 1 of the Kolkata Test provided an early hint of what was to come. As the evening light faded, Shoaib steamed in and shattered VVS Laxman’s stumps with a searing inswinging delivery. A warning shot had been fired.

But the true storm was yet to arrive.

As Day 2 dawned, India was in control. Rahul Dravid and Sadagoppan Ramesh were methodically grinding down Pakistan’s modest first-innings total of 185. With the score at 147 for 2, drinks were taken.

Session breaks can be deceptive. Batsmen, even those well-set, can lose their rhythm in the brief pause. Wasim Akram, ever the astute leader, sensed an opening. He tossed the ball to Shoaib Akhtar, hoping the young speedster could break the deadlock.

What followed was not just a breakthrough—it was an earthquake.

Shoaib charged in with his trademark long run-up, his energy still high despite the Kolkata humidity. His first delivery to Dravid, a full-length inswinger, seemed to move with an intelligence of its own. The ball started straight, then suddenly dipped and curled towards the leg stump. Dravid, a master technician, tried to bring his bat down in time—but the ball was too quick, too well-directed.

Leg stump cartwheeled.

Boom.

Dravid, the man who would later become “The Wall,” had been breached. Kolkata’s murmurs of discontent were growing. But the real drama was yet to unfold.

Sachin Tendulkar emerged from the dressing room, greeted by a thunderous ovation. Ninety thousand fans rose in unison, chanting his name. In India, Tendulkar was more than just a cricketer—he was a deity. And now, he stood between Shoaib Akhtar and history.

The crowd roared as Tendulkar took his guard. Shoaib, already in motion, barely waited.

The delivery was full, reversing viciously in the air. Tendulkar, ever composed, adjusted slightly, looking to drive. But the ball swerved late, as if obeying a hidden command, and slipped past his bat.

Middle stump lay uprooted.

For a moment, silence.

A silence so profound it felt unreal in a stadium bursting with life just seconds earlier.

Boom.

Sachin Tendulkar, the greatest batsman of his era, had fallen for a golden duck—the first in his Test career.

Shoaib Akhtar, arms outstretched, tilted his head to the sky, absorbing the moment. He had not just dismissed two of the world’s finest batsmen—he had done it in successive deliveries, in their own backyard, on the grandest stage.

The Changing of the Guard

As if scripted for maximum drama, the next batsman in was India’s captain, Mohammad Azharuddin. If Shoaib’s deliveries to Dravid and Tendulkar had been masterpieces of swing, his delivery to Azharuddin was an exhibition of raw hostility.

A bouncer, fast and steep, crashed into the back of Azhar’s helmet. The message was clear—this was a different breed of fast bowler.

By the time Shoaib’s spell ended, his figures read 4 for 71, his final victim being Venkatesh Prasad, beaten by yet another scorching yorker. But numbers only tell part of the story.

In the stands, Waqar Younis watched. He had built his career terrorizing batsmen with toe-crushing yorkers, reverse swing, and sheer pace. And now, before his eyes, a successor had emerged.

Shoaib Akhtar was not just another fast bowler. He was a force of nature, a whirlwind of pace and personality. His career would be marked by brilliance and controversy, by breathtaking spells and moments of recklessness. But on this day in Kolkata, none of that mattered.

Cricket had found its next great fast bowler.

And Pakistan had found its new storm.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar