India's Inevitable Triumph: Depth and Quality Prevail in a Gritty Final

In a final that demanded both resilience and tactical acumen, India once again proved why they are the dominant force in modern cricket. New Zealand, the perennial fighters, pushed them to the brink, but India's depth—both in batting and bowling—ultimately secured them their second ICC title in as many tournaments. With this victory, India have now won 22 of their last 23 completed matches in ICC events, a testament to their ruthless efficiency at the highest level.

At the heart of this contest lay a battle of adaptation: a weary Dubai pitch that slowed down as the game progressed, a New Zealand side forced to recalibrate their approach against India's relentless spinners, and an Indian batting lineup that navigated moments of peril with calculated aggression. In the end, while New Zealand played with spirit, India’s superior firepower ensured their unbeaten run remained intact.

The Toss and the Tactical Battle

India's struggles with the toss in ODIs had become almost mythic—15 consecutive losses coming into this final. But when it mattered most, the coin finally landed in their favor. Given the pitch’s history of slowing down under lights, the decision to chase was crucial. New Zealand, though, were undeterred.

Rachin Ravindra, the tournament’s leading run-getter, provided an early display of technical mastery, treating the new ball with disdain. His effortless stroke play stunned the packed stadium, and New Zealand stormed to 69 for 1 in the powerplay. But India, as they have done throughout this tournament, trusted their spinners to change the tempo.

Varun Chakravarthy, the mystery spinner, struck first, deceiving Will Young with drift and natural variation. Then came Kuldeep Yadav, a bowler whose form had flickered throughout the tournament but who reserved his best for the biggest stage. In a single over, he delivered twin strikes that ripped through New Zealand’s core—Ravindra fell to a beautifully disguised wrong’un, and the ever-dependable Kane Williamson succumbed to dip and flight, offering a return catch.

At 75 for 3, New Zealand were reeling, their early momentum undone by India's masterful spin web. Tom Latham and Daryl Mitchell attempted a counterpunch, but Jadeja’s unerring accuracy—10 overs for just 30 runs—stifled any revival. The scoreboard crawled forward, the innings losing steam. It took them 21 overs to double their 10-over score.

Michael Bracewell’s late assault—53 off 40—added a veneer of competitiveness to the total, but it always seemed short of par. His clean striking, reminiscent of Ravindra’s earlier fluency, injected some last-minute drama. Yet, as India returned to pace in the death overs, Mohammed Shami’s subtle variations closed the door on a truly imposing target.

New Zealand finished with a total that was respectable but never daunting. Against a team as resourceful as India, it was always going to need something special.

India’s Chase: A Test of Nerve and Adaptation

If New Zealand needed a miracle, Rohit Sharma ensured they never got a sniff. His powerplay onslaught—64 runs without loss—set the foundation, punishing anything remotely loose. He attacked the fast bowlers with an authority that signaled intent, forcing New Zealand’s spinners into the fray earlier than they would have liked.

The game, however, was far from over. Glenn Phillips, electric in the field throughout the tournament, plucked a stunning one-handed catch to dismiss Shubman Gill. Michael Bracewell then trapped Virat Kohli for a rare failure, and suddenly, the momentum had shifted.

New Zealand sensed an opening. The pitch, by now offering more turn—3.4 degrees compared to the first innings' 2—began aiding their spinners. Rohit, uncharacteristically restrained, seemed set for a long haul but fell attempting an ill-advised charge. At 122 for 3, India had the runs under control but found themselves in a battle against creeping doubt.

Shreyas Iyer and Axar Patel stitched together a partnership of necessity rather than fluency, surviving dropped catches and close calls. Iyer’s unconvincing knock saw him escape multiple times—caught at the boundary before Young’s foot touched the rope, then shelled by Jamieson attempting successive sixes. The errors proved costly.

When Iyer finally fell for 39, India needed 67 off 68 balls. The required rate never soared beyond control, but the match remained delicately poised. KL Rahul, unflappable as ever, absorbed the pressure. As New Zealand finally turned back to pace in the death overs, he and Ravindra Jadeja executed the finishing touches with precision. Even the late dismissal of Hardik Pandya, undone by a hostile Jamieson bouncer, did little to alter the inevitable conclusion.

With an over to spare, Rahul and Jadeja completed the formalities, sealing a four-wicket victory. India’s depth, once again, had carried them through.

A Tournament of Domination

This was not just another win—it was a statement. India’s near-unbeatable consistency across the last three ICC events is a reflection of their all-encompassing strength: a batting lineup that extends deep, a spin department that thrives even on unhelpful surfaces, and a fast-bowling unit that understands the nuances of conditions.

For New Zealand, this was another valiant effort that ended in heartbreak. They fought hard, made India sweat, but the sheer quality of their opposition proved insurmountable.

For India, this was a coronation. Two ICC trophies in hand, two finals narrowly missed. A staggering 22 wins out of 23 in major tournaments. If there were any doubts before, they have now been put to rest—this is a team built for dominance.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

New Zealand Cricket: The Art of Consistency and the Pursuit of Glory

As the 2025 ICC Champions Trophy final approaches, New Zealand stands at the threshold of another defining moment in its cricketing history. Having conquered South Africa in the semi-finals, the Black Caps once again find themselves within touching distance of a major ICC title. Their journey, marked by resilience, structure, and an unrelenting pursuit of excellence, serves as an extraordinary case study in cricketing consistency.

A Legacy of Consistency

Since the inception of the ODI World Cup in 1975, New Zealand has consistently punched above its weight. Of the 13 World Cups held thus far, they have reached the semi-finals an astonishing nine times. This remarkable feat places them among the cricketing elite, with a semi-final qualification rate that rivals powerhouses like Australia and India.

Yet, what makes this accomplishment even more striking is New Zealand’s modest financial standing in the cricketing world. With an estimated worth of just $9 million, they rank as the 10th most affluent cricket board—trailing even Bangladesh. Despite this, their ability to perform at the highest level, cycle after cycle, speaks to the strength of their cricketing infrastructure, their selection policies, and their unwavering commitment to team cohesion.

Pioneering Steps and Heartbreaking Near Misses

New Zealand’s semi-finalist pedigree dates back to 1975, when they first broke into the top four. A defining moment came in the 1992 World Cup, co-hosted with Australia. Under the astute leadership of Martin Crowe, the Kiwis played a fearless brand of cricket, only to fall short against an inspired Pakistani side led by a young Inzamam-ul-Haq. The injury to Crowe in that match remains one of cricket’s great “what-if” moments.

Subsequent tournaments saw similar storylines unfold—semi-final finishes in 1999 (defeated by Pakistan again), and a period of relative stagnation in the early 2000s. However, from 2007 onwards, a new golden era emerged.

From Competitors to Finalists: A Psychological Shift

The appointment of a new coaching regime in 2012 marked a pivotal moment in New Zealand’s approach to global tournaments. Until then, they had reached six World Cup semi-finals but had never taken that next step to the final. The 2015 World Cup changed that narrative. Playing an aggressive, high-intensity brand of cricket, New Zealand won every game en route to the final, including a memorable semi-final victory over South Africa at Eden Park. While they ultimately fell to Australia in the final, the psychological barrier had been broken.

Four years later, in 2019, the Kiwis reached another World Cup final dramatically. Unlike their dominant 2015 campaign, this time they scraped through to the semi-finals but found a way to edge past India. What followed was arguably the most agonizingly close final in cricket history—New Zealand lost to England on a boundary count after a tied Super Over, coming within an inch of their maiden World Cup title.

Even in 2023, in challenging Indian conditions, they once again secured a semi-final berth, cementing their reputation as perennial contenders.

The Broader Context: How New Zealand Compares

A closer look at historical World Cup performances highlights the Kiwis’ extraordinary consistency. Australia, the undisputed benchmark in ODI cricket, has also made nine semi-finals, albeit with multiple titles to their name. India, a cricketing superpower backed by the financial behemoth of the IPL, has reached eight semi-finals, with a clear rise in performance post-2008. By contrast, England, despite its deep cricketing roots and financial muscle, has only reached six semi-finals. South Africa, for all its cricketing prowess, remains yet to make a final, having suffered another painful exit at the hands of New Zealand in the 2025 Champions Trophy semi-final.

In the broader historical context, even former giants of the game—Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and the West Indies—have fewer semi-final appearances than New Zealand. The question then arises: How does such a small nation, with limited financial resources and a population of just five million, continue to remain among the world’s elite?

The Secret to New Zealand’s Success

The answer lies not in monetary investment but in the strategic frameworks underpinning their cricketing philosophy. New Zealand Cricket has consistently fostered a culture of long-term planning, allowing coaches and selectors the freedom to experiment between major tournaments. This ensures that by the time a World Cup or Champions Trophy arrives, the squad is well-settled, players understand their roles, and team chemistry is finely tuned.

More importantly, their cricketing identity prioritizes team dynamics over individual brilliance. While nations like India, Australia, and England often revolve around star players, New Zealand’s strength lies in its collective approach. Their ability to remain competitive across formats and generations is a testament to the effectiveness of this model.

A Defining Moment in 2025?

As New Zealand prepares to face India in the 2025 Champions Trophy final, the narrative remains the same: Can they finally break through and claim another ICC trophy? Their sole success came in the 2000 edition of the tournament in Kenya, a title that remains somewhat underappreciated in cricketing history. A win against India in this final would not only solidify their standing as a modern-day powerhouse but also provide validation to their philosophy of consistency over financial might.

The story of New Zealand cricket is one of resilience, structure, and strategic foresight. While critics may point to their lack of an ODI World Cup title, the fact remains that they have been among the world’s best for decades. In sport, as in life, being consistently in the race is as commendable as winning it outright. With another opportunity on the horizon, perhaps this is the moment when the Kiwis finally seize their destiny and add another golden chapter to their cricketing legacy.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

 

New Zealand March into Another Final, South Africa Falter Yet Again

New Zealand’s enduring love affair with ICC events continued as they stormed into their seventh global final, their fourth in the ODI format, with a commanding 50-run victory over South Africa in Lahore. Their triumph was built on a record-breaking batting display, an astute tactical approach, and a well-rounded bowling effort, while South Africa, once again, found themselves on the wrong side of a semi-final heartbreak.

The Black Caps’ dominance was exemplified by the contrasting yet complementary brilliance of Rachin Ravindra and Kane Williamson. Ravindra, the fearless stroke-maker, compiled his fifth ODI century—each one curiously arriving on an ICC stage—while Williamson, the architect of New Zealand’s batting order, notched a third consecutive century against South Africa. Their second-wicket stand of 164 was a masterclass in pacing an innings: Ravindra’s urgency never allowing the bowlers to settle, while Williamson’s patience allowed him to build towards an inevitable acceleration.

Their contributions were bolstered by Daryl Mitchell and Glenn Phillips, who injected late-innings carnage with their brisk knocks of 49 each. The final push saw New Zealand amass 83 runs in the last six overs, a statement of intent that left South Africa gasping for air. By the time they had posted 326 for 6—surpassing the highest-ever Champions Trophy total—the game had already tilted decisively in their favor.

South Africa’s Familiar Failings

A target of 327 was always going to be an uphill climb, but South Africa’s fate was sealed not in their chase but in the field. Their bowling, usually a potent force, was uncharacteristically blunt. They squandered early movement, persisted with pace-on deliveries despite clear indications that pace-off was the smarter option, and committed costly errors in the field. Marco Jansen and Keshav Maharaj, both usually reliable, went wicketless, while Lungi Ngidi’s intelligent use of slower balls yielded two breakthroughs but wasn’t enough to stem the tide.

It was a performance marred by missed opportunities, most notably when Heinrich Klaasen shelled a sharp chance off Williamson on 56. South Africa's inability to capitalize on key moments only compounded their woes, allowing New Zealand to maintain their stranglehold.

In the chase, their hopes briefly flickered as Temba Bavuma and Rassie van der Dussen steadied the innings after an early setback. Both batters reached their half-centuries, taking on New Zealand’s spinners with controlled aggression. At the halfway mark, their score of 143 for 2 mirrored New Zealand’s own 143 for 1. And yet, the symmetry ended there.

Mitchell Santner, the canny left-arm spinner leading New Zealand in this campaign, broke the game open with a spell that was as much about intellect as it was about execution. Bavuma was lured into a mistimed lofted stroke, van der Dussen was undone by subtle variation, and Klaasen, South Africa’s designated destroyer, perished in a desperate bid for acceleration. As wickets tumbled, so did South Africa’s resolve.

The Inevitability of Defeat

By the 35th over, the contest had taken on a grim inevitability. With South Africa needing 170 from 90 balls and only five wickets remaining, even ESPNcricinfo’s win predictor was unsympathetic, giving them a less than 0.5% chance. David Miller fought against that statistic with a lone hand of remarkable defiance, reaching a century off the final ball of the match, a moment tinged with both personal pride and collective sorrow. His subdued cradle celebration—perhaps a tribute to his newborn son—felt eerily reminiscent of his hundred in the 2023 World Cup semi-final: a heroic effort drowned in the tide of an inevitable loss.

For South Africa, this was the ninth time they had fallen at an ICC ODI semi-final hurdle, their only triumph dating back to the inaugural Champions Trophy in 1998. The weight of history grows heavier with each stumble, and with it, the lingering questions about their temperament in high-pressure knockouts.

For New Zealand, however, the script remains one of resilience, adaptability, and quiet excellence. Twenty-five years after their last ICC ODI triumph, the dream of lifting a trophy once more is tantalizingly within reach. Come Sunday in Dubai, against an in-form Indian side, they will have their chance.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar

India March into Champions Trophy Final with Tactical Mastery Over Australia

In a hybrid system, neither Lahore nor Karachi will host but Dubai is set to host the grand finale of the Champions Trophy, and India will grace the occasion, having methodically outmanoeuvred a spirited yet inconsistent Australian side in a gripping semi-final showdown - comfortably scheduling and playing at the same venue do help,.The victory, while emphatic, was not a procession; Australia frequently flirted with ascendancy, conjuring moments that hinted at an alternate narrative. Yet, each time they threatened to wrest control, India’s tactical precision and unwavering composure wrested it back, reinforcing the fine margins that separate the great from the good in high-stakes cricket.

 Kohli’s Chemistry and India’s Calculated Pursuit

India’s success in chases often finds its anchor in Virat Kohli, and this match was no exception. The talismanic batter, already renowned for his masterful orchestration of run chases, seemed poised for yet another defining century. Having already constructed a sublime, pressure-absorbing ton earlier in the tournament against Pakistan, Kohli appeared set for an encore before an uncharacteristic swipe at a big shot curtailed his innings at 84. Despite this, his knock ensured that India’s equation boiled down to a manageable 40 off 44 balls, a scenario that Rahul and Pandya duly capitalized upon with clinical efficiency.

KL Rahul and Hardik Pandya injected a final flourish, peppering the boundary with five sixes and three fours, yet India’s triumph was not merely a function of power-hitting. Their methodical dismantling of the target was built on the bedrock of precision and urgency between the wickets. While Australia found 153 dot balls clogging their innings, India’s tally stood at a significantly lower 124. Moreover, their fleet-footed approach yielded 158 runs through running, eclipsing Australia’s 129, highlighting a deeper level of intent and control over the tempo of the chase.

Spin Dominance and the Art of Containment

India’s bowling strategy, too, was a masterclass in adaptability. While their decision to persist with a four-spinner attack initially seemed an aggressive gamble, it proved to be a measured stroke of genius. The Dubai surface, though not overtly turning, was slow and low, rendering India’s spinners—who collectively delivered a dot-ball percentage of 50%—instrumental in suffocating Australia’s batters. Unlike their Australian counterparts, who struggled with consistency and leaked runs, India’s spin quartet maintained discipline, keeping the stumps in play and tightening scoring avenues.

Despite these tactical constraints, Australia still found moments where they threatened to breach the 300-run barrier. Travis Head, who survived an early scare when Mohammed Shami spilled a caught-and-bowled chance in the first over, swiftly recovered from a sluggish start to smash 39 off 32 balls, evoking memories of his World Cup final heroics in Ahmedabad. However, his aggression proved his undoing, as he miscued a wrong’un from Varun Chakravarthy to long-off, an ill-fated attempt at immediate dominance against a bowler he had never faced before in any format.

Steven Smith, ever the craftsman, compiled an intelligent 73, employing deft manipulation of the crease to pierce the field with sweeps, drives, and lofted strokes. Yet, his luck, which had already survived two dropped chances, finally ran out when an ill-judged charge at a Shami full-toss left his stumps in disarray. That moment proved pivotal, and within five balls, Australia’s fortunes further nosedived when Glenn Maxwell, having just slog-swept Axar Patel for six, was undone by a skidding delivery that crashed into his stumps. From 198 for 4 in the 37th over, Australia found themselves abruptly reeling.

Carey’s Lone Resistance and India’s Inevitable Triumph

The flickering embers of Australian resistance found their last glow in Alex Carey, who, arriving at a perilous 144 for 4, launched an assertive counterattack. His approach was fearless—unorthodox lofts over cover, calculated reverse sweeps, and decisive footwork to exploit gaps defined his innings. His 60 off 56 balls was shaping into a potential game-changer, but a moment of audacity cost him dearly. Attempting a risky second run in the 47th over, he found himself caught short by a pinpoint direct hit from Shreyas Iyer at backward square leg—a moment emblematic of India’s relentless sharpness in the field.

From that point on, Australia’s innings unravelled rapidly, culminating in their dismissal for 264 with three balls left unutilized. It was a total that hinted at competitiveness but ultimately fell short against an Indian side whose efficiency in both batting and bowling proved decisive.

With this commanding performance, India book their place in the final, their balance and strategic depth setting them apart. In Dubai, they will seek to cap off their campaign with the ultimate prize, and on the evidence of this display, they will enter that contest with both momentum and the aura of inevitability.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

 

India’s Spin Mastery Over New Zealand: A Clinical Display in a Classic ODI Encounter

India's comprehensive victory over New Zealand marked a historic moment, as they defeated a team that had recently been a formidable challenge in their ODI encounters. It was India's sixth consecutive win against New Zealand, a side that had often proved to be a "bogey team" for them. This performance not only secured India’s top spot in their group but also saw Varun Chakravarthy rise to the occasion with a match-winning five-wicket haul. His redemption came on a pitch that had earlier seen him struggle against Pakistan in 2022, signaling the resurgence of a bowler whose international career had previously faced setbacks.

The match, which unfolded at a venue where traditional ODI tactics were evident, was defined by a balanced display of seam and spin bowling. India, having posted a competitive total of 249, proved their mettle by exploiting the conditions expertly, turning what initially seemed like a modest score into an unassailable target. With this victory, India now prepares for a semi-final clash against Australia, while New Zealand, along with South Africa, heads to Pakistan for their semi-final contest.

The First Innings: India’s Controlled Approach

The match began with conditions favorable to seamers, as the ball moved both in the air and off the pitch during the first innings. This swing and seam movement provided ample opportunity for the pacers to capitalize early. India's innings, however, was marked by a period of consolidation after Matt Henry's exceptional seam bowling reduced them to a fragile 30 for 3. Henry's five-wicket haul and the disciplined performance from New Zealand’s seamers—particularly with the ball swinging for Kyle Jamieson—put India on the back foot. The Indian batsmen struggled to find rhythm early on, with even the usually dependable Virat Kohli falling victim to a spectacular catch by Glenn Phillips.

Yet, it was Shreyas Iyer and Axar Patel who anchored the innings and demonstrated the virtues of traditional, patient ODI batting. While Iyer initially struggled to get going, he showed remarkable restraint, adopting a defensive approach for the first 63 balls. His innings was the epitome of measured aggression, slowly building momentum. Patel, playing a crucial role as an all-rounder, provided stability with a composed 42 off 61 balls. The two added 98 runs for the fourth wicket, despite going 51 balls without a boundary—a testament to their discipline and the difficult conditions.

While India's top order crumbled, Iyer and Patel's partnership ensured the innings remained relevant. Their patience was evident in their ability to rotate the strike effectively and to pick off singles, avoiding rash shots. The duo showed that playing risk-free cricket, without taking undue chances, was often the best way to build a challenging total on a difficult pitch.

India's lower order, led by Hardik Pandya (45 off 45 balls), ensured that India reached 249, a total that, while not overwhelming, was made more challenging due to the slowing pitch and the increasing grip for spinners. Pandya's quickfire innings, although not explosive, was vital in lifting India’s total from a precarious position.

New Zealand’s Chase: Spinners Dominate as India Tightens the Noose

New Zealand’s chase started with promise, but the Indian spinners, who were critical in the middle overs, systematically broke their resistance. The introduction of spin early in the second innings, particularly from Ravindra Jadeja and Varun Chakravarthy, soon put New Zealand on the back foot. The surface, which had already begun to grip, favored the spinners as India bowled 29 overs of spin in the middle phase. New Zealand found it difficult to counter the precision and variations of India’s spinners.

The turning point in the chase came when Jadeja bowled an exceptional delivery to dismiss Tom Latham. The ball pitched on the reverse-sweep line and turned sharply to hit the stumps, marking the beginning of New Zealand’s collapse. With India’s spinners in full control, the required rate climbed steadily, and wickets began to tumble.

India's bowlers continued to apply relentless pressure. Kuldeep Yadav removed Daryl Mitchell with an unplayable delivery that narrowly missed Mitchell’s inside edge, a ball that perfectly exemplified the challenges posed by India’s wrist spinners. As the required rate climbed to six an over by the 23rd over, the New Zealand batsmen were forced to take greater risks. However, the pressure exerted by the Indian spinners left little room for mistakes.

Kane Williamson, the New Zealand captain, was left with the daunting task of holding the innings together. His 80, although technically sound, came at a slow pace, reflecting the challenging conditions and the constant pressure created by the Indian bowlers. The slow rate of scoring left New Zealand’s chase vulnerable, with the asking rate creeping up with every passing over.

Chakravarthy’s Redemption: A Five-Wicket Haul to Seal the Victory

The breakthrough moments came from Varun Chakravarthy, who, after a modest start to his international career, delivered a match-winning performance. Chakravarthy’s variations were the key to New Zealand's downfall. He used a variety of deliveries, including the legbreak and the wrong’un, and kept the New Zealand batsmen guessing with his subtle seam changes. He took two crucial wickets in quick succession, including that of Mitchell Santner, who fell to a medium-paced cross-seam delivery. The ball, bowled at a pace of 113 km/h, shattered Santner's stumps, bringing the game closer to its conclusion.

As the chase continued to unravel, Williamson, despite his efforts, was eventually dismissed by Axar Patel, who bowled him with a straight delivery. The asking rate was now nine runs per over, and with New Zealand's middle and lower order crumbling, the game seemed all but over. Chakravarthy returned to clean up the tail, completing his five-wicket haul and further cementing his place as the match's standout performer.

The Tactical Masterstroke: India’s Spin-Bowling Triumph

India's strategy of relying heavily on spin proved to be a masterstroke, especially given the nature of the pitch and the lack of dew. While pacers like Pandya and Shami provided initial breakthroughs, it was the spinners who took control, tightening the noose around New Zealand’s batters. Jadeja, Yadav, and Chakravarthy bowled a total of 37.3 overs between them, claiming nine wickets for just 166 runs. The performance was a marked improvement from earlier matches, where India’s spinners had conceded runs at a higher rate.

Chakravarthy’s redemption arc was one of the defining stories of the match. Having struggled in past encounters, including his disappointing performance against Pakistan, he delivered a standout performance when it mattered most. His tactical use of different deliveries, including the scrambled seam and the straight seam for different variations, made him difficult for the New Zealand batsmen to read. The key dismissals of key batters like Will Young, Daryl Mitchell, and Kane Williamson showed his growing influence on international cricket.

Conclusion: A Comprehensive Team Effort

India’s victory was a result of a collective team effort, with contributions from the top order, middle order, and the spinners. Despite the early setbacks with the bat, the calm and composed innings from Iyer and Patel provided the necessary foundation for a competitive total. The spinners, led by Chakravarthy, then took charge and dismantled the New Zealand batting lineup with precision and accuracy.

This victory was a testament to India's ability to adapt to the conditions and execute their plans flawlessly. As they prepare for a semi-final clash against Australia, the confidence gained from this performance will serve them well. For New Zealand, it was a frustrating defeat, but one that exposed the vulnerabilities in their batting against quality spin bowling. As both teams move forward, the lessons learned from this match will certainly shape their approach to the upcoming challenges.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

The Hybrid Model and the Unquestionable Advantage: This Is Not Cricket

Cricket, often celebrated as the great equalizer, has long been a game of conditions, adaptation, and strategy. But what happens when the very nature of its tournaments tilts the balance? As Rohit Sharma and his counterparts boarded their respective flights for the Champions Trophy, six of the eight captains had to engage in a meticulous study of conditions—venue dynamics, temperature fluctuations, dew factors, the pitch's temperament towards pace or spin, and even the vagaries of the weather. All this data would have either been supplied to them by their analytical teams or meticulously researched by the captains themselves.

Pakistan's skipper, Mohammad Rizwan, carried the natural advantage of home familiarity, an edge that historically defines the importance of hosting in cricket. The precedent is clear: in the last four 50-over World Cups, the host nation has either lifted the trophy or, at the very least, reached the final. Home conditions are not just an environmental factor; they shape selections, strategies, and ultimately, results.

However, a peculiar anomaly in this tournament has granted an even greater advantage—an unfair hybrid model that ensures Team India enjoys privileges unlike any other. This is not a veiled accusation but a stark reality. While Rizwan understands the nuances of Karachi, Lahore, and Rawalpindi, Rohit Sharma and his men remain stationed in Dubai, unburdened by travel, acclimatization, or venue-specific recalibration.

A Schedule Dictated by One

Consider New Zealand’s itinerary. Having just played India in Dubai, they must now undertake a cross-continental journey back to Pakistan for their semifinal. If they progress to the final and India does the same, they will once again board a flight back to Dubai. In stark contrast, India’s squad will merely return to their hotel rooms, wake up refreshed, and meticulously prepare for the finale in the comfort of a stable environment.

This logistical disparity is not a mere coincidence but a direct byproduct of the hybrid model. To be clear, India did not explicitly request this convenience. All participating teams, including Pakistan, signed off on the schedule before it was ratified by the ICC. Yet, the advantage persists, raising critical questions about fairness and the spirit of competition.

The Unquantifiable Yet Indisputable Edge

Michael Atherton, speaking on the Sky Sports Podcast, succinctly articulated this imbalance:

“What about the advantage India have in playing in Dubai, only in Dubai? Which seems to me to be a hard-to-quantify advantage, but an undeniable advantage.”

With India playing exclusively in Dubai, their selection strategy could be honed with precision. The inclusion of five frontline spinners was not an accident—it was a calculated decision based on Dubai’s slow and turning pitches. Nasser Hussain elaborated further:

“They were very smart in their selection. They probably knew what Dubai is going to be like. They picked all their spinners. There was a bit of debate with Indian media saying why don’t you have gone for an extra seamer? Why all these spinners? Now we can see why.”

Contrast this with England or Pakistan. England, if they reach the semis, will only have one specialist spinner. Pakistan, too, has just a solitary frontline spinner. The difference is glaring: while other teams must adjust to different surfaces in Karachi, Lahore, and Rawalpindi, India enjoys consistency, an uninterrupted focus on a single venue’s conditions.

The Politics of Cricket: A Larger Question

The uncomfortable truth is that cricket's global governing structure is increasingly skewed by financial power. Once India refused to tour Pakistan, an alternative had to be devised—one that protected India’s participation and the lucrative India-Pakistan contest. The ICC’s acquiescence to this arrangement only cements the notion that revenue, not fairness, governs modern cricket.

In this landscape, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) looms large. With its financial clout, it dictates not only India’s itinerary but, indirectly, the logistical fate of all other teams. The argument that India deserves this advantage because it generates the most revenue rings hollow—it mirrors the logic of a monopoly, where power justifies privilege.

For over two decades, this growing imbalance has eroded the very ethos of cricket. The sport that once prided itself on being a contest of skill and adaptability is increasingly becoming a stage where certain teams are cushioned by systemic advantages. If cricket is to retain its democratic spirit, it must resist the temptation of structural favouritism. For in a game that reveres fairness, no team—no matter how powerful—should wield an advantage so blatant, so unchecked.

This is not cricket. This is something else entirely.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

England’s Champions Trophy Hopes End in Afghan Storm

England entered the Champions Trophy to reclaim their former dominance in ODI cricket. After their opening defeat to Australia, they consoled themselves with the belief that it was an unfortunate blip, a result of Lahore’s unpredictable conditions rather than their own shortcomings. However, their hopes were decisively crushed in a dramatic encounter against Afghanistan, whose clinical performance exposed the cracks in England’s game.

The eight-run loss, though narrow on paper, was far from a fluke. It culminated in Afghanistan’s superior strategy, discipline, and execution. More than just a victory, it signified Afghanistan’s rise as a force in world cricket and underscored England’s ongoing decline.

Afghanistan’s Innings: Zadran’s Masterpiece and a Late Surge

A Rocky Start

Afghanistan’s innings began on shaky ground as they found themselves struggling at 37 for three. England’s pace attack, led by Jofra Archer, initially dominated. Archer’s sharp burst accounted for three wickets in his first six overs, leaving Afghanistan with a mountain to climb. At the halfway mark, they had only managed 103 for three, and England seemed to have the upper hand.

Zadran’s Brilliance

Then came the transformation. Ibrahim Zadran played an innings of rare quality—177 runs off 146 balls, blending patience with explosive power. While wickets fell around him, Zadran remained composed, anchoring the innings and shifting gears at the right moments. His shot selection was impeccable, his placement clinical, and his temperament unshaken by England’s early dominance.

Explosive Finish by Azmatullah and Nabi

Zadran found crucial support in captain Hashmatullah Shahidi, who contributed a stabilizing 40, before the game-changing partnerships arrived. Azmatullah Omarzai, fresh from an early failure with the ball, unleashed a counterattack, smashing three sixes in a 31-ball 41.

Then, the veteran Mohammad Nabi joined the charge. His 41 off just 24 balls was an exhibition of fearless hitting. In the 47th over alone, he plundered 23 runs off Joe Root, accelerating Afghanistan’s total past the 300-mark. By the end, the duo had added 111 runs in just 55 balls, turning a solid total into a daunting one—325 for seven.

England’s Chase: A Mixture of Hope and Collapse

Early Wickets and Mounting Pressure

Chasing 326 under lights, England needed a strong start, but their top order crumbled under pressure. Phil Salt departed for 12 after a wild hack against Azmatullah Omarzai, while debutant Jamie Smith misjudged his shot selection and perished for nine, falling to Nabi’s first delivery.

Ben Duckett looked in good touch but was undone by Rashid Khan’s mastery, pinned lbw for 38. Meanwhile, Harry Brook continued his miserable run against spin, gifting a simple return catch to Nabi for 25.

Root’s Lone Resistance

Amid the wreckage, Joe Root stood tall. The former England captain played a masterful innings, crafting 120 from 111 balls. His strokeplay was a blend of precision and artistry, even producing an audacious “pancake-flip” six—an uncharacteristic yet remarkable shot.

For a time, Root and Jos Buttler threatened to turn the tide. Their partnership of 83 runs steadied the chase, keeping England’s hopes alive. But when Buttler fell for 38, top-edging a pull to deep midwicket in the 37th over, the writing was on the wall.

The Final Collapse

With Root left to shoulder the burden, England’s fate hung in delicate balance. But his dismissal in the 46th over, 39 runs short of the target, signalled the beginning of the end. Jamie Overton tried to stage a fightback with a brisk 32, but he too succumbed at the crucial moment.

Jofra Archer’s dismissal left England needing 13 off the final over. The task proved insurmountable, and when Adil Rashid fell off the penultimate delivery, Azmatullah Omarzai completed his five-wicket haul, sealing a historic win for Afghanistan.

England’s Bowling Woes: A Persistent Problem

Archer’s Mixed Day

Jofra Archer’s return to international cricket was a tale of two halves. His initial burst—three wickets for just 22 runs—gave England early control. But as the innings progressed, his impact faded. His last four overs went for 42 runs, mirroring England’s growing struggles in the death overs.

Wood’s Fitness Concerns and Middle-Overs Struggles

Mark Wood, battling a knee injury, was far from his best. His pace lacked its usual venom, and England’s attack suffered as a result. Meanwhile, their inability to take wickets in the middle overs remains a glaring issue. Ever since Liam Plunkett’s departure post-2019, England’s ODI bowling has lacked a cutting edge during this crucial phase.

Lack of Support for Adil Rashid

Adil Rashid was once again England’s most reliable spin option, but the lack of a second attacking spinner left England vulnerable. Afghanistan capitalized on this, ensuring that Rashid alone could not apply sustained pressure.

Afghanistan’s Evolution: No Longer an Underdog Story

This victory was not an upset in the traditional sense. Afghanistan are no longer the plucky underdogs—they are equals. Their batting depth, all-round strength, and fearless approach have turned them into genuine contenders.

Their bowling attack, spearheaded by the guile of Rashid Khan, the versatility of Azmatullah, and the experience of Nabi, is well-rounded and effective. Their fielding, once a weak point, has improved significantly.

With this win, Afghanistan’s semi-final hopes remain alive. They now face Australia in Lahore, a match that will test their credentials further.

England’s Future: A Period of Soul-Searching

For England, this defeat is more than just an early tournament exit. It raises fundamental questions about their ODI identity.

Buttler’s Captaincy Under Scrutiny

Jos Buttler’s future as captain is now under the microscope. His tactical decisions, batting form, and leadership will all be questioned in the aftermath of this failure.

The Batting Core: Aging or Adapting?

Joe Root’s century was a reminder of his class, but beyond him, England’s batting lacked adaptability. The new generation—Salt, Smith, and Brook—have yet to prove they can anchor innings in pressure situations.

Bowling Rebuild Needed

Without a reliable middle-overs enforcer and a fit pace attack, England’s bowling unit looks fragile. The absence of a second frontline spinner also continues to haunt them.

Conclusion: Two Teams, Two Directions

As England depart Lahore for Karachi, their journey has become one of introspection rather than ambition. Their match against South Africa is now a mere formality—a chance to salvage pride but little else.

Afghanistan, on the other hand, march forward with momentum and belief. Their next challenge against Australia will be another step in their remarkable journey—a team once born in refugee camps now challenging the world’s best on cricket’s grandest stages.

This was not just another match. It was a statement. A reminder that Afghanistan belong among the elite and that England, once kings of ODI cricket, are now searching for a way back.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Black Caps Rising: Ravindra's Brilliance and Bangladesh’s Missed Chance

In a tournament marked by transition, New Zealand have remained steadfast. The Champions Trophy has showcased several teams in flux, but the Black Caps have been a beacon of continuity, signalling that their next generation is more than ready for the grand stage. Just a few years ago, Kane Williamson shouldered the burden of their batting lineup. Now, Rachin Ravindra has stepped forward, eager to claim that responsibility, embodying the spirit of a team that seamlessly blends experience with emerging talent.

Batting at an unfamiliar No. 4 position, Ravindra was thrust into the fray at 15 for 2. He neither hesitated nor faltered, and when he reached his century, it was with the same assuredness and unflappable demeanour that defined his entire innings. His knock not only sealed New Zealand’s place in the semi-finals but also confirmed India’s progression, officially eliminating Pakistan and Bangladesh. His innings was not just about runs; it was a statement, a declaration that he is ready to be a mainstay in the team’s future campaigns.

Bangladesh's Faltering Resolve

For Bangladesh, this was a must-win encounter, yet their approach lacked the urgency the situation demanded. They began fluently, scoring at nearly a run a ball, but then inexplicably drifted into a period of inertia. Ten of the next fifteen overs produced three runs or fewer. This stagnation invited pressure, which ultimately consumed their most experienced players. Mushfiqur Rahim and Mahmudullah, who together have played 511 international matches, managed a combined six runs before their dismissals left Najmul Hossain Shanto stranded in a crumbling structure.

Shanto's 77 off 110 deliveries reflected his predicament—constantly forced to readjust to new partners, recalibrating to ever-shifting match conditions. He could have done better, but the real disappointment lay in those around him, who should have done much more. The inexperience of the middle order, the lack of intent, and poor shot selection painted a picture of a team that seemed unwilling to rise to the occasion.

Ravindra’s Masterclass in Adaptation

For a brief moment, Bangladesh found hope. Taskin Ahmed and Nahid Rana ignited early sparks, dismantling Will Young’s stumps in the first over and dismissing Williamson cheaply. The energy was palpable; the fielders buzzed, and the crowd roared. Then came Ravindra, exuding calm amid the storm.

His touch is exquisite—effortless yet effective. He found gaps rather than forcing shots, relying on his impeccable timing. Introduced into the XI as a replacement for the ill Daryl Mitchell, he began his innings within the fielding restrictions, capitalizing on the gaps with precision. His first five boundaries were a masterclass in placement, each stroke executed with elegance and intent. His adaptability in reading the conditions and adjusting his approach showcased a maturity beyond his years.

As the field spread, Ravindra adjusted, transitioning seamlessly from aggression to control. His first 23 runs came at a brisk 21-ball pace, his next 28 from 29 deliveries. A brief moment of peril surfaced in the 12th over—a mix-up with Devon Conway nearly saw him run out, but Tanzid Hasan missed the direct hit. Bangladesh had an opportunity but let it slip. New Zealand, in contrast, did not miss theirs.

The Art of Execution

New Zealand’s excellence lay in execution. Williamson was instrumental in the field, pouching crucial catches at short midwicket and cover. Michael Bracewell, the unheralded hero, delivered a spell of precision—4 for 26 in an uninterrupted 10-over stint. His spell not only dismantled Bangladesh’s lineup but also exposed their fundamental flaw: an inability to rotate strike. His ability to slow down the pace, extract turn, and build pressure was a lesson in disciplined spin bowling.

Bangladesh’s innings was marred by 178 dot balls, with Bracewell alone accounting for 43 of them. Their struggles harked back to a bygone era—2012 was the last time they had batted with such anaemic intent in a 50-over match. Their approach to breaking the shackles was ill-conceived. Mushfiqur miscalculated a slog-sweep, failing to clear the long boundary. Mahmudullah, instead of consolidating, embarked on a reckless charge down the track, skying a leading edge to cover. Their tactics, or the lack thereof, showcased a team struggling to find a balance between aggression and responsibility.

The Difference Between Champions and Contenders

New Zealand showcased a level of control Bangladesh simply could not match. Even as the pitch improved under lights, the Black Caps maintained discipline. A telling moment arrived in the 40th over—New Zealand stationed only three boundary riders when five were permitted. They had Bangladesh pinned, mentally and tactically, dictating every aspect of the game.

By the time Bangladesh's innings concluded, it was a study in regret. The late movement under lights, the sharp turn, the low bounce, the direct-hit run-out—everything pointed to what could have been had they reached a competitive total. The missed run-out chance on Ravindra when he was 25 loomed large. A target of 260 might have made all the difference.

But in the end, New Zealand knew the formula: partnerships. Ravindra forged a crucial 57-run stand with Conway, followed by a defining 129-run alliance with Tom Latham—New Zealand’s crisis manager extraordinaire. Latham possesses the temperament of a man who, in a post-apocalyptic world, would quietly assume the role of the protagonist’s trusted advisor. His calculated approach, ability to assess situations, and execution of plans make him indispensable in the middle order.

First, though, there’s an ICC trophy at stake, and New Zealand have made it clear—they mean business. With a well-oiled machine, a new generation stepping up, and a hunger that remains undiminished, the Black Caps are on a mission. The semi-finals await, and if their performances thus far are any indication, New Zealand are far from done.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar  

India thrash Pakistan in the Champions Trophy: A Study in Underachievement

Pakistan cricket, once a force to be reckoned with, now finds itself at a perplexing crossroads. Their players display immense enthusiasm for the shorter formats, eagerly signing up for franchise leagues worldwide—barring the Indian Premier League (IPL), which remains out of reach. Some might even prioritize these leagues over national duties if given the chance, much like Adnan Sami trading one identity for another. The Pakistan Super League (PSL) has become the primary focus for many, often at the cost of Test commitments. Despite their affinity for white-ball cricket, their performances against quality opposition paint a grim picture—one of a team that appears malnourished in both skill and temperament. The once-feared Pakistani bowling attack, renowned for its fire and flair, now oscillates between flashes of brilliance and prolonged mediocrity.

Pakistan’s Relevance in Contemporary Cricket

Pakistan's continued relevance in world cricket hinges on two factors: their passionate and loyal fan base and their historic rivalry with India. Without these, their decline would have rendered them an afterthought in global discussions. They are still labeled as "unpredictable," but that unpredictability now resembles the erratic success of an associate nation—a team capable of a stunning upset after a long stretch of insipid displays. The Pakistan of today is inconsistent, frustrating, and devoid of the steel that once defined its cricketing identity.

The Tactical and Mental Shortcomings

The recent match in Dubai provided a telling glimpse into Pakistan's cricketing struggles. The pitch offered more pace than the one used against Bangladesh. It wasn’t a batting paradise, but conditions improved under lights. Pakistan, however, failed to capitalize.

Batting Failures

Babar Azam’s Short Stay: The talismanic Babar Azam showcased his trademark cover drive—a fleeting moment of brilliance—before perishing cheaply.

Imam-ul-Haq’s Run Out: In an almost poetic nod to his uncle Inzamam-ul-Haq’s career-defining running mishaps, Imam found himself run out in an unnecessary manner.

Mohammad Rizwan’s Approach: Rizwan’s innings was particularly puzzling. Arriving at 47 for 2, he struck his first ball for four, suggesting intent, but then abandoned the idea of scoring altogether. At one point, he had faced 50 balls for a mere 24 runs, treating the crease as a sanctuary he dared not disturb. Meanwhile, at the other end, Saud Shakeel at least attempted to manufacture singles, ensuring he did not succumb to pressure. By the time Shakeel reached fifty, he had faced 29 dot balls; Rizwan, in contrast, had already accumulated 40. India’s strategy to deny him early spin proved a masterstroke, leaving him stuck in a limbo between caution and paralysis.

Collapsing Under Pressure: Pakistan’s innings never gained momentum. Wickets tumbled as the team succumbed to the ever-mounting pressure, as if reserving their aggressive instincts for franchise leagues rather than international cricket.

India’s Clinical Execution

India, in response, made Pakistan’s modest 242-run target appear trivial.

Virat Kohli’s Masterclass: Kohli, the ever-reliable competitor, dismantled Pakistan’s much-hyped attack with precision and composure. His century—his 51st in ODIs—was a statement, reaffirming that any perceived decline in his prowess would not define him.

Historic Milestones: Kohli surpassed 14,000 ODI runs and led India to a semifinal berth while effectively eliminating Pakistan from the 2025 Champions Trophy. The defending champions and future hosts now require external results to fall in their favor to remain relevant in the tournament—a stark embodiment of their fabled “Kudrat Ka Nizam.”

The Harsh Reality of Pakistan Cricket

The truth is sobering: this Pakistan team does not deserve better. The hunger and junoon that once made them world-beaters is conspicuously absent.

Factors Contributing to the Decline:

Lack of Leadership: The absence of a strong, tactical leader like Imran Khan or a mentor like Wasim Akram has left Pakistan rudderless.

T20-Centric Mindset: The overemphasis on T20 leagues has eroded the temperament required for longer formats.

Inconsistency: Their reputation as an unpredictable team now mirrors that of an associate nation—capable of surprises but largely unreliable.

Conclusion

In the grand theater of international cricket, Pakistan has transitioned from a dominant force to a team that evokes nostalgia more than admiration. Their unpredictability is no longer a mark of danger but a symptom of decline. Until Pakistan rekindles its past junoon and prioritizes national pride over short-term financial gains, their performances will continue to frustrate rather than inspire.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

The Resurgence of Lahore: A Night of Records and Redemption

For nearly three decades, Lahore—a city synonymous with cricketing passion and the legacy of a lion-hearted cricketer—had been deprived of the honor of hosting an ICC event. The last time it stood under the global spotlight was during the 1996 World Cup final, a night immortalized in cricketing folklore. After 29 years, Lahore once again bore witness to an enthralling spectacle—an ICC Champions Trophy encounter between the age-old rivals, Australia and England. On a wicket that gleamed under the floodlights, bowlers found themselves in a relentless battle, their margin for error minuscule against the relentless will of two batting juggernauts. The result was a breathtaking contest that shattered records and rewrote history.

A Tale of Two Centuries: Duckett’s Brilliance and Inglis’ Counterattack

England’s batting was headlined by Ben Duckett, whose 165-run masterclass became the highest individual score in Champions Trophy history. In a team desperately searching for a ruthless finisher, Duckett embodied controlled aggression, combining precision with sheer audacity. His innings, though structured on classical technique, was punctuated by improvisation, as he capitalized on the wayward lines of Australia’s untested pace attack. England’s foundation was built through a crucial 158-run partnership between Duckett and the ever-reliable Joe Root, whose 68 was an exhibition in finesse and placement. Yet, for all their dominance, England’s innings unraveled at the most inopportune moments.

Root’s dismissal, falling to a wily Adam Zampa in the middle overs, shifted the tempo. England’s lower order faltered in the face of calculated bowling from Nathan Ellis and Marnus Labuschagne, the latter stepping up as an unlikely hero at the death. Archer’s late blitz ensured England breached the 350-run mark, setting up what should have been a formidable total. But as history would soon witness, it was a total that proved insufficient.

The Inglis Orchestration: A Masterpiece in a Chase of Magnitude

Australia’s response was a mirror image of England’s innings—an initial stumble followed by recovery, a middle-order consolidation leading into a crescendo of aggressive strokeplay. The absence of Pat Cummins, Josh Hazlewood, and Mitchell Starc—the talismanic trio of Australian pace—meant the responsibility of defending the target fell upon a relatively untested attack. Conversely, their batting lineup still carried the DNA of champions, and it was Josh Inglis who rose to the occasion, scripting a chase for the ages.

Coming in at a precarious juncture, Inglis blended aggression with astute shot selection, showcasing a penchant for backfoot dominance. His unbeaten 120 off 86 balls was a study in pressure management, an innings sculpted in the face of rising run-rate demands. The decisive moment arrived when he dismantled England’s most potent weapon, Jofra Archer, whose fiery spells had rattled the Australians early on. Inglis’ sequence of audacious strokes—piercing gaps and clearing boundaries—sealed England’s fate even before Glenn Maxwell’s finishing touches.

The Strategic Subtleties and Tactical Miscalculations

England’s approach, despite being underpinned by individual brilliance, was marred by tactical missteps. The decision to shuffle their batting order, deploying Jamie Smith at No. 3, appeared a gamble that backfired, disrupting the natural rhythm of Root, Harry Brook, and Jos Buttler. Additionally, their inability to extract wickets in the middle overs cost them dearly. Adil Rashid’s spell, which momentarily stifled Australia’s progress, was inexplicably curtailed, allowing Inglis and Carey to stabilize and eventually accelerate.

On the other hand, Australia, under the stand-in leadership of Steve Smith, made pragmatic decisions that paid dividends. The promotion of Labuschagne as a death-overs option, the reliance on Ellis for precision, and the calculated risk of deploying an untested pace duo—all culminated in a tactical masterstroke that subdued England’s advances.

A Night of Records and Reflection

This contest was not merely a group-stage encounter; it was a reaffirmation of Australia’s pedigree in high-pressure chases. Their highest successful pursuit in an ICC tournament, their second-highest in ODIs, and a timely reminder that, despite the absence of their frontline stars, the resilience embedded in their cricketing culture remains undiminished. For England, the loss serves as both a wake-up call and a moment of introspection—an acknowledgment that brilliance in patches does not equate to triumph in entirety.

As Lahore’s Gaddafi Stadium echoed with the sounds of cricket’s ever-evolving narrative, it became evident that the sport’s heart beats strongest in arenas where history meets the present. This night belonged to Australia, but the echoes of its significance will reverberate far beyond a single result—it was a spectacle, a statement, and a tribute to the unyielding drama that only cricket can deliver.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

A Tactical Encounter in Dubai: India vs Bangladesh in the ICC Champions Trophy 2025

The ICC Champions Trophy 2025 match between India and Bangladesh was expected to be a routine victory for the Men in Blue. However, played in Dubai rather than the cricketing hotbeds of Lahore or Karachi, the usual fervor of an India match was noticeably subdued. Unlike the electrifying reception they might have received in Pakistan, the Indian team played in front of a relatively quiet and scattered crowd, making for an unusual setting for a high-stakes tournament game.

Bangladesh’s Fightback on a Tough Pitch

The slow, low deck in Dubai made run-scoring a laborious task for both teams. Bangladesh’s young brigade, despite their inexperience, showed great resilience in posting a competitive total. Their batting lineup initially crumbled under pressure, slipping to 35 for 5 due to some rash shot selection and disciplined Indian bowling. However, a remarkable century from Towhid Hridoy, aided by some crucial dropped catches by India, gave Bangladesh a lifeline. The middle and lower-order fightback ensured that they posted a total of 229, which proved tricky for India to chase.

Shami’s Brilliance and India’s Missed Opportunities

Mohammed Shami was the architect of Bangladesh’s early collapse, claiming his sixth ODI five-wicket haul and becoming the quickest bowler to reach 200 ODI wickets in terms of balls bowled. His incisive bowling left Bangladesh reeling, but lapses in fielding allowed the opposition to recover. Axar Patel, too, played a significant role, claiming crucial wickets and nearly securing a hat-trick. However, dropped catches—particularly by Rohit Sharma and KL Rahul—allowed Bangladesh to gain momentum.

India’s Chase: A Struggle for Stability

India’s pursuit of 229 started assuredly, with Rohit Sharma and Shubman Gill laying a solid foundation with a 69-run opening stand. Rohit played aggressively, scoring a quickfire 41 off 36 balls before falling while trying to capitalize on the powerplay. His departure marked a turning point, as India’s innings slowed down considerably.

A Battle Against Spin and Conditions

Virat Kohli, India’s mainstay, once again fell to a legspinner, this time Rishad Hossain, who deceived him with a well-disguised delivery. Shreyas Iyer tried to settle in but perished while attempting to accelerate. Axar Patel, promoted in the batting order, failed to read a topspinner and was dismissed cheaply. With the wickets of key batters falling at regular intervals, India’s chase became a test of patience and adaptability.

Shubman Gill: The Anchoring Role

Amidst the struggles, Shubman Gill emerged as the saviour for India. Unlike his usual flamboyant style, Gill adjusted to the sluggish nature of the pitch, crafting his slowest ODI century and the slowest by an Indian in six years. After Rohit’s dismissal, he curbed his attacking instincts, relying on singles and rotating the strike efficiently. He took 52 balls to score his next 30 runs, waiting for the right moments to accelerate.

The Final Surge: India Seals the Victory

As the match neared its conclusion, Gill finally shifted gears, targeting the returning Tanzim Hasan. He reached his century with a six and a four, finishing with 125 balls to his name. KL Rahul, who had earlier survived a dropped chance, provided the finishing touch, striking a six off Tanzim to take India home with 21 balls to spare.

Lessons from the Contest

Both teams walked away with key learnings from this gripping contest. Bangladesh will rue their missed chances—both in the field and with their early batting collapse—but will take heart from the resilience shown by their middle order. India, on the other hand, will view this victory as a test passed under difficult conditions, but they will be wary of their vulnerability on slow pitches, something that haunted them in Sri Lanka previously.

In the end, it was a tactical battle where Shami’s brilliance, Bangladesh’s fighting spirit, and Gill’s patience combined to produce a contest that was far from a foregone conclusion.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

Pakistan Cricket: Between Hope and Heartbreak

An ICC event in Pakistan was once unthinkable. A nation burdened with relentless setbacks since the dawn of the 21st century has never ceased to push forward. Pakistan, in its resilience, has turned survival into an art form, and its people have redefined perseverance. Cricket, in the grand scheme of their struggles, may not be the most pressing concern. Yet, the sport has endured, surviving where logic suggested it would perish. Decades of isolation following the tragic events in Lahore created a lost generation—one that grew up watching their national team play in foreign lands. And yet, cricket never abandoned Pakistan, just as Pakistan never abandoned cricket. After 29 years, an ICC event returns to its soil, albeit in a hybrid model, because the financial overlords of the sport deemed Pakistan unworthy of a full embrace.

But what of Pakistan, the team? Even their most passionate supporters do not expect them to rival the clinical efficiency of Australia, the strategic might of England, or the calculated dominance of New Zealand. They do not seek trophies or domination—they crave improvement, fight, and a return to their proud heritage of unpredictability. Yet, their wishes remain unfulfilled, their expectations met with heartbreak more often than triumph. The structural weaknesses of Pakistan’s cricketing ecosystem are exposed time and again—an inconsistent domestic system, fragile player development, and administrative instability all contribute to the team’s stagnation.

The opening match of the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 was supposed to be a homecoming, a statement of revival. And for a fleeting moment, it seemed as though Pakistan had seized the narrative. A leg-spinner producing a carrom ball dismissal. A young fast bowler removing one of the world’s best batters. The dream was taking shape. But then, reality set in. Will Young batted as though he were playing against a club team, while Tom Latham anchored, and Glenn Phillips ensured Pakistan’s misery was complete. The lack of a clear bowling strategy, especially in the middle overs, highlighted Pakistan’s persistent tactical shortcomings.

A total of 320 on a surface with just enough variable bounce to keep bowlers interested should have been a competitive challenge. But then, Pakistan batted—or did they? They were present, in uniform, holding bats, but their innings only truly began after the 18th over. By then, the chase was already slipping away, like sand through desperate fingers. Expecting to chase down 321 with a self-inflicted handicap is not optimism; it is delusion. The lack of intent in the powerplay overs, a recurring issue for Pakistan, continues to undermine their chances in modern white-ball cricket. While the world embraces aggressive play and high strike rates, Pakistan remains shackled by outdated approaches.

Somewhere, Babar Azam is still playing out dot balls, eternally waiting for his moment to attack. His inability to accelerate under pressure, while technically gifted, reflects a deeper issue within Pakistan’s batting philosophy. The absence of a structured middle-order approach exacerbates the problem, often leaving too much for too few at the death.

While most New Zealand batters struggled, Young’s innings appeared effortless, a masterclass in quiet destruction. He never imposed himself with brute force; rather, he glided through the innings while those around him floundered. And when Pakistan had the new ball, it was anything but menacing. Mohammad Rizwan, ever the dramatist, made every delivery seem like a landmine, though his presence was only necessitated by Fakhar Zaman’s back injury.

New Zealand’s fielding was surgical in its precision. A tight backward point, an aggressive point fielder in the circle, and an advanced cover point made Pakistan’s offside strokes redundant. Every firm push met an immovable Kiwi, every well-timed shot found an agile hand. Glenn Phillips, a cricketer molded for moments like these, provided a fielding masterclass before pulling off a breathtaking catch—a left-handed stunner that typified Pakistan’s plight.

Pakistan’s chase of 321 was already a distant dream by the tenth over—22 for 2. Fakhar Zaman arrived too late to make a difference, his 24 off 41 a mere footnote in an innings that never found its rhythm. Rizwan and Babar, the twin pillars of Pakistan’s batting, once again looked for redemption but found only frustration. Khushdil Shah and Salman Ali Agha provided sparks, but in isolation, sparks do not ignite a blaze.

The structural flaws in Pakistan’s cricketing setup demand urgent attention. A reactive approach to team selection, inconsistent leadership, and tactical rigidity hinder progress. While talent is abundant, the pathways to nurture and harness it remain flawed.

Defeat was never in question—it was merely a matter of time.

New Zealand, ever clinical, continued their fine run in Pakistan. The hosts, meanwhile, remain trapped in a familiar cycle of hope and despair, knowing that improvement is imperative but never quite knowing how to achieve it. Until systemic changes are made, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between moments of brilliance and prolonged mediocrity, never quite bridging the gap between nostalgia and reality.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar