I saw Jimmy Cook play in a Test match against Sri Lanka at
Moratuwa in 1993. It was not a live match, but a match recorded in a video cassette
which I borrowed from Filmfare Video shop. The quality of the video was not up
to the mark, but still it was an enjoyable one. Allan Donald and Brett Schultz
were breathtaking and amid some brilliant batting display by the likes of Hasham
Tillakaratne, Arjuna Ranatunga, Jonty Rhodes and Andrew Hudson, Jimmy Cook’s
dull display hardly caught my attention.
And it should not caught my attention at all. As I grew up and started to understand the game and its history a bit more, I could realize what a bad effect apartheid had on South African cricket. Jimmy Cook’s career was badly affected by apartheid and you can’t expect a forty-year old to dish out a great performance. But mind you, Jimmy was a fantastic opener whose career did not flourish the way it should have.
But his son, Stephen Cook injected hope and a delightful feeling in his father’s heart despite a belated Test debut. Stephen is a solid batsman and his technique looked satisfactory to me. Why it took so late for the South African hierarchy to realize the true worth of Stephen? In my opinion, he should have been included in the teamsince the first Test. Keeping in mind about his staggering
success in domestic cricket last season, preferring Stiaan van Zyl over him seemed a pretty awkward
one.
His century-partnership with Hashim Amla proved that years of struggle and spending a lot of time in domestic cricket have not only made him a mature batsman, but a cricketer who is devoid of shakiness. He gelled so well with a superstar like Amla that none will think that he was playing in his maiden Test match.
And it should not caught my attention at all. As I grew up and started to understand the game and its history a bit more, I could realize what a bad effect apartheid had on South African cricket. Jimmy Cook’s career was badly affected by apartheid and you can’t expect a forty-year old to dish out a great performance. But mind you, Jimmy was a fantastic opener whose career did not flourish the way it should have.
But his son, Stephen Cook injected hope and a delightful feeling in his father’s heart despite a belated Test debut. Stephen is a solid batsman and his technique looked satisfactory to me. Why it took so late for the South African hierarchy to realize the true worth of Stephen? In my opinion, he should have been included in the team
His century-partnership with Hashim Amla proved that years of struggle and spending a lot of time in domestic cricket have not only made him a mature batsman, but a cricketer who is devoid of shakiness. He gelled so well with a superstar like Amla that none will think that he was playing in his maiden Test match.
By the way, the sort
of batting display Amla scripted can be tagged as graceful. Some of his shots
were directly from the top-drawer – artistic amalgamation of pristine timing
and velvety wrist work. Yet another hundred for Amla while Stephen is now a
part of cricketing history. A brilliant hundred to his name to justify his
selection and of course make his father proud.
As soon as the partnership was broken, South Africa started to lose wickets quickly. Both AB de Villiers and JP Duminy frustrated big time. Duminy played a nothing-shot and sadly, his talent never transformed into deeds.Temba Bavuma
and Quinton de Kock arrested a certain collapse.
I could not find the sharpness among the English bowlers
which had been evident in the previous Tests. In this Test series, Steve Finn has
been the most influential bowler for me. Broad dished out a magical spell while
As soon as the partnership was broken, South Africa started to lose wickets quickly. Both AB de Villiers and JP Duminy frustrated big time. Duminy played a nothing-shot and sadly, his talent never transformed into deeds.
Thank You
Faisal Caesar
Quality, both Cook and your writing :)
ReplyDeleteThank You :)
Delete