A Nail-Biting Thriller: Pakistan vs. West Indies, 1987 World Cup

The 1987 Cricket World Cup bore witness to some unforgettable encounters, but the clash between Pakistan and West Indies in Lahore stands out as a gripping spectacle of cricketing drama and sportsmanship. Both teams entered the game with contrasting fortunes: Pakistan eager to consolidate their position, and West Indies desperate to revive their campaign after an early loss to England. What unfolded was a tale of resilience, nerves, and an unforgettable gesture of integrity.

A Promising Start for West Indies

The West Indies began on a confident note. Desmond Haynes and debutant Phil Simmons provided a solid foundation, with Simmons crafting a brisk half-century. At 91 for 1, the Caribbean side seemed poised for a commanding total. However, the introduction of Saleem Jaffar changed the equation. With three quick wickets, Jaffar disrupted the middle order, leaving the West Indies reeling.

Enter Viv Richards. The maestro’s 52-ball 51 brought much-needed acceleration. His commanding presence steadied the innings until Imran Khan, Pakistan’s talismanic captain, returned to the attack. Imran’s spell (4 for 37) dismantled the tail, and West Indies were bowled out for a modest 216 in 49.3 overs. Jaffar (3 for 30) and Wasim Akram (2 for 45) provided stellar support.

The Chase: A Story of Resolve

Pakistan’s reply began shakily. At 110 for 5, the home side’s hopes seemed to be slipping away. It was at this juncture that wicketkeeper-batsman Saleem Yousuf joined Imran Khan. Yousuf, often overshadowed by his more illustrious teammates, showcased his ability with a counterattacking display. His audacious stroke play rattled the West Indies bowlers and exploited fielding lapses, as the visitors spilled multiple chances under pressure.

Imran played the anchor role, rotating the strike to allow Yousuf to flourish. Together, they revived Pakistan’s innings, but Courtney Walsh’s disciplined bowling ended their partnership. Imran departed with 15 runs still required. Yousuf, battling valiantly, fell shortly after, leaving the tail to secure the final runs.

The Final Over: A Test of Nerves

With 14 runs needed off the last over, Walsh, who had endured heartbreak against England days earlier, was entrusted with the ball. Abdul Qadir and Saleem Jaffar were Pakistan’s last hopes at the crease.

The drama unfolded ball by ball. A single from Qadir followed by another scrambled run from Jaffar left 12 required off four deliveries. Then, in a moment of brilliance, Qadir danced down the pitch and lofted Walsh over long-off for a six. The Gaddafi Stadium erupted, and the equation shifted to four runs off two balls.

Qadir’s clever placement for two runs brought Pakistan within striking distance. But as Walsh prepared to deliver the final ball, a moment of extraordinary sportsmanship stunned everyone. Noticing Jaffar backing up too far, Walsh stopped mid-run and opted not to dislodge the bails. Instead, he issued a warning, earning admiration and applause from both players and spectators.

With two needed off the last ball, Walsh delivered a straight yorker. Qadir squeezed it past a drawn-in third man, and the batsmen ran two to seal a famous win for Pakistan.

The Aftermath: A Lesson in Integrity

The victory bolstered Pakistan’s semi-final hopes and left the West Indies’ campaign in jeopardy. However, it was Walsh’s act of sportsmanship that transcended the game. Despite the heartbreak, his decision to warn rather than appeal against Jaffar for backing up became a defining moment of cricketing ethics.

Saleem Jaffar later remarked, “The old cricketers had great character and played with integrity. Walsh’s gesture was a reminder of the spirit in which the game should be played.”

For Pakistan, the win exemplified their resilience under pressure. For the West Indies, it was a bittersweet chapter in a tournament that slipped away. Above all, this match remains etched in cricketing lore as a perfect blend of competition and camaraderie, where the game’s spirit shone as brightly as its skills.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar  

The Day Viv Richards Reigned Supreme: A Tale of Unrelenting Power

Once upon a time, the cricketing world trembled at the sight of a figure whose mere presence on the field could alter the course of a match. This figure, none other than the indomitable Viv Richards, wielded his bat like a mace, striking fear into the hearts of bowlers across the globe. On this fateful day, the West Indian legend unleashed a devastating display of power that would etch itself into the annals of cricket history.

Sri Lanka, under the captaincy of Duleep Mendis, came into the match with a respectable bowling attack. Vinothen John, Ravi Ratnayeke, Don Anurasiri, and Ashantha de Mel formed the backbone of their bowling unit, supported by the part-time options of Aravinda de Silva, Arjuna Ranatunga, and Asanka Gurusinha. Though the Sri Lankan side boasted a solid batting lineup, they were still the underdogs in the face of a West Indian team led by Richards, a squad brimming with talent and dominance.

Mendis’ decision to put the West Indies into bat was a gamble, one that appeared to backfire early on. John and Ratnayeke bowled with discipline, restricting the West Indian openers. Ratnayeke struck first, clean-bowling Carlisle Best, and then claimed the wicket of Richie Richardson, who edged his first ball to Brendon Kuruppu. At 45 for 2, with Ratnayeke on a hat-trick, Sri Lanka were firmly in control, and the West Indies seemed rattled.

The King Takes Over 

But then, from the shadows of uncertainty, emerged the man who would change the course of the game. Viv Richards, his biceps rippling beneath his shirt, chewed gum with an intensity that seemed to signal the beginning of something ominous. His gaze, as Sunil Gavaskar once remarked, conveyed the message: “What am I doing here among children? I should be among men.”* Richards was not just a batsman; he was a force of nature.

He began cautiously, playing a couple of elegant cover drives, before quickly accelerating. Desmond Haynes, his opening partner, also found his rhythm, and the runs began to flow. Richards’ fifty came up off 62 balls, but this was merely the calm before the storm. The first signs of his impending onslaught came when Aravinda de Silva bowled a delivery aimed at leg stump. Richards, ever the master of improvisation, moved outside leg and dispatched the ball through extra cover with such ferocity that the fielders barely moved. It was the first six of the innings, and the warning signs were clear.

As the game progressed, Richards' destructive power became evident. His hundred came off 98 balls, with the second fifty coming in just 35 balls—a blistering pace that left the Sri Lankan bowlers helpless. With Gus Logie content to play the role of a supporting act, Richards took full control. His shots were a masterclass in power and timing, with extra-cover, square-leg, and mid-wicket becoming the favoured targets. The ball flew over the boundary with ease, and when it didn’t, it raced to the fence so quickly that the fielders had no time to react.

The Carnage

At this point, the West Indies had surpassed Pakistan’s previous record of 338 for five, set just four years earlier. Richards then surpassed Kapil Dev’s iconic 175 not out, with a towering straight six that further cemented his place in cricketing folklore. The Sri Lankan bowlers, particularly de Mel, were helpless in the face of this onslaught. De Mel, who had been a key figure in the previous World Cup, finished with figures of 1 for 97 from his ten overs, a record for the worst economy rate in World Cup history for a bowler who had bowled ten or more overs.

Richards’ assault continued until, with his score at 181, he mishit a delivery from de Mel. As his left hand came off the bat, Roshan Mahanama, running from backward point to third man, pulled off an astonishing catch that would go down in history. Richards’ innings, which included 16 fours and seven sixes, had come to an end, but by then, the damage was done. The West Indies were on 343, and they would go on to finish with a monumental 360 for 4 in their allotted 50 overs.

The Sri Lankan response, though valiant, was never truly a contest. Mahanama, in particular, threatened to take the fight to the West Indies, striking three boundaries off the first three balls he faced. However, his dismissal, caught off Walsh, was the beginning of the end. Sri Lanka’s middle order, led by Gurusinha and Ranatunga, could only delay the inevitable. Gurusinha’s 36 off 108 balls was a brave effort, but it lacked the urgency needed to chase down such a daunting target. Sri Lanka, despite a valiant fifty from Ranatunga and some fine strokes from Mendis, were never in the hunt. The West Indies triumphed by 191 runs, with Richards’ brilliance ensuring that the result was never in doubt.

In the end, this match was not just a victory for the West Indies, but a testament to the raw, unbridled power of Viv Richards. It was a performance that transcended the boundaries of cricket, a reminder that in the right hands, a bat could become a weapon capable of destruction on a scale rarely seen. The Sri Lankans, despite their best efforts, were left to wonder what might have been had they been able to contain the beast that was Richards on that unforgettable day.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

The Pakistan-England Thriller At Rawalpindi in 1987 Cricket World Cup : A Clash of Grit, Spin, and Strategy

Throughout the 1980s, England faced a rollercoaster of cricketing emotions. They challenged Australia head-on, traded blows with India, and suffered relentless hammerings from the West Indies' fearsome pace attack. Their encounters with Pakistan, however, carried a unique tension. The infamous Shakoor Rana incident symbolized their fraught relationship, and the mystique of Abdul Qadir, Pakistan’s spin wizard, added another layer of torment for the Englishmen.

Qadir’s mastery over England was legendary. His unorthodox leg-spin baffled even seasoned batters. Vic Marks summed it up best: “Good Lord, he’s bowled me a full-toss. Where shall I smash it? Hang on it’s a low full-toss. Not to worry. Maybe it’s a half-volley. Oh no, it’s a length ball and I’m groping hopelessly.” Qadir’s dominance against England was a critical factor whenever the two teams met, and this match at Rawalpindi was no exception.

A Muddy Start and a Defiant Pakistan

Pakistan, entering the 1987 World Cup as one of the favourites, had already faced a stiff challenge from Sri Lanka in their opening match. England, on the other hand, came off a thrilling victory against the West Indies at Gujranwala, courtesy of Allan Lamb’s heroics. The stakes were high as the two teams clashed in Rawalpindi for Pool A supremacy.

Rain on the scheduled day of play turned the outfield into what Wisden aptly described as a “mudfield.” When play resumed on the reserve day, Mike Gatting’s decision to field first seemed justified as England’s fielders struck early. Chris Broad’s sharp fielding ran out Rameez Raja, putting Pakistan on the back foot. But the seasoned duo of Saleem Malik and Javed Miandad steadied the ship, countering England’s disciplined bowling with grit and precision.

DeFreitas’s double breakthrough, dismissing Miandad and Malik in quick succession, threatened to derail Pakistan’s innings. However, Ijaz Ahmed and a food-poisoned Imran Khan anchored the middle order with a crucial 79-run partnership. Imran’s resilience, despite his illness, allowed Ijaz to accelerate, and Qadir’s late cameo alongside Saleem Yousuf propelled Pakistan to a respectable 239 for 7.

England’s Response and Qadir’s Magic

 Chasing 240, England’s openers began cautiously, adding 52 runs before Qadir’s artistry dismantled Graham Gooch’s defence. Broad’s dismissal by Tauseef Ahmed and Qadir’s removal of Tim Robinson further tightened Pakistan’s grip. Gatting’s brisk 43 from 47 balls kept England in the hunt, but his dismissal left the visitors needing 34 from 24 balls with Lamb and Derek Pringle at the crease.

 Qadir, entrusted with the ball during the critical phase, turned the game on its head. Lamb, England’s hero against the West Indies, fell leg-before to Qadir’s guile. A disastrous mix-up between Emburey and Pringle led to Emburey’s run out. Paul Downton’s edge off Qadir was brilliantly caught by Saleem Yousuf, marking a dramatic collapse as Qadir claimed three wickets in the span of one run.

England’s slim hopes were extinguished by further run-outs of Pringle and Foster, leaving Gladstone Small—a bowler with no batting pretensions—to face the music. Saleem Jaffar delivered the final blow, trapping Small leg-before to seal Pakistan’s 18-run victory.

A Triumph of Spin and Fielding

This match epitomized Pakistan’s reliance on spin and strategic fielding. Abdul Qadir’s spell, coupled with sharp fielding and tactical captaincy, turned a potentially close contest into a decisive victory. His ability to outfox England’s batters highlighted their longstanding vulnerability against high-quality spin.

For England, the loss underscored the perils of poor running between the wickets and the inability to counter spin effectively. Despite moments of brilliance from Gatting and Lamb, their middle and lower order crumbled under pressure, handing Pakistan a crucial win.

The Rawalpindi encounter remains a testament to the impact of spin and fielding in limited-overs cricket. Abdul Qadir’s wizardry and Pakistan’s strategic acumen prevailed, reaffirming their status as tournament favourites while exposing England’s frailties on the subcontinental stage.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar 

A Critical Look at the Relationship Between Bangladesh Cricket and the Press: A Call for Change

 In the ongoing cricket series between Bangladesh and South Africa, a significant controversy has emerged regarding the Bangladesh team’s interaction with the media. According to Prothom Alo, one of Bangladesh’s most popular yet controversial newspapers, the Bangladesh cricket team, under the leadership of head coach Chandika Hathurusingha, has refused to grant interviews to Bangladeshi journalists who travelled to South Africa to cover the series. The team’s practice sessions were held indoors, behind an iron gate, and journalists were denied access. This decision, though controversial, has sparked a deeper conversation about the dynamics between the Bangladesh cricket team and the local sports media.

The Strained Relationship Between Hathurusingha and Local Journalists

Since his appointment as head coach in 2014, Chandika Hathurusingha has faced consistent criticism from a faction of Bangladesh’s sports journalists. Despite his success in transforming the team from a state of mediocrity to a competitive force in international cricket, some journalists have persistently painted him as an "autocrat" and "rude" figure. However, players like Shakib Al Hasan, Mahmudullah Riyad, and Tamim Iqbal have repeatedly expressed their satisfaction with Hathurusingha’s methods and leadership.

The criticism levelled against Hathurusingha often seems to be more personal than professional, rooted in a longstanding vendetta. For a coach to bring out the best in his players, a strict approach to discipline and ethics is often necessary, and if this so-called "autocratic" style results in positive outcomes for the team, it should be seen as a strength rather than a flaw. Hathurusingha’s preference for privacy and consultation with only the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) and team management should not be viewed as a flaw, but rather as a deliberate strategy to maintain focus and avoid unnecessary distractions.

The Role of the Press: Superiority Complex and the Misuse of Influence

The issue at hand is not merely about Hathurusingha’s reluctance to engage with the media, but the broader attitude that some of Bangladesh’s sports journalists bring to their work. A certain section of the media seems to believe that they are entitled to access and influence, treating their relationship with players and officials as one of superiority. When coaches or players choose to withhold comments or deny access, these journalists often retaliate by twisting statements or publishing negative stories, creating a toxic atmosphere around the team.

This phenomenon is not new. The case of Nazmul Hassan, the BCB president, is a prime example. His comments about Mushfiqur Rahim were misinterpreted and twisted, leading to widespread outrage among fans. Similarly, when players like Soumya Sarkar or Liton Das choose to avoid certain journalists, they are often subjected to public criticism and their reputations are undermined. This behaviour not only harms the individuals involved but also damages the overall image of Bangladesh cricket.

One must ask: what is the real contribution of these journalists to Bangladesh cricket? Beyond sensationalizing stories and spreading misinformation, what positive impact have they had on the sport? While there are certainly competent and knowledgeable sports journalists in Bangladesh, a disturbing trend has emerged where less-skilled individuals with a limited understanding of the game have gained prominence in the media landscape. This has led to a dilution of the quality of sports journalism in the country.

The Mashrafe Mortaza Conundrum: Exploiting Personal Relationships for Professional Gain?

A particularly troubling aspect of this media-player dynamic is the relationship between some journalists and key players, notably Mashrafe Mortaza, one of Bangladesh’s most beloved cricketers. The "bromance" between Mashrafe and certain journalists has given rise to a harmful syndicate that undermines the integrity of the sport. These journalists, using their personal relationships with Mashrafe, have gained easy access to the team and have used this access to create unnecessary hype and stir controversy.

This unhealthy influence has led to the creation of sensationalized stories and conspiracies, which only serve to confuse and divide the fanbase. It raises the question: is Mashrafe using these journalists for his own benefit? Is he seeking to manipulate public perception and position himself as a hero by vilifying others? This manipulation of the media for personal gain is detrimental to the health of Bangladesh cricket and must be addressed.

The Need for Change: A Call for BCB’s Intervention

It is high time that the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) takes a firm stance against the negative influence of certain journalists. A code of conduct needs to be established, one that ensures that access to players and officials is controlled and that journalists are held accountable for their actions. The BCB must prioritize the welfare of the team and the sport over the interests of a select few journalists who seek to exploit their access for personal or professional gain.

While journalism is a noble and challenging profession, it must be practised with integrity and responsibility. The current state of sports journalism in Bangladesh, with its emphasis on sensationalism and personal vendettas, is not only disgraceful but also harmful to the development of the sport. The constant provocation and manipulation of players and coaches, as seen with former coaches like Heath Streak and Thilan Samaraweera, have resulted in their premature departure from the team.

Conclusion: A Call for a More Responsible Media

Bangladesh cricket, its players, and its fans deserve better. The BCB must act swiftly to address the growing issue of negative media influence and ensure that the focus remains on the game, not on personal rivalries or sensationalist stories. The media’s role should be to support and uplift the sport, not to tear it down with misinformation and personal agendas. For the sake of Bangladesh cricket, it is crucial that the BCB enforces stricter guidelines on media access and ensures that the voices of those who truly understand the game and its nuances are the ones that are heard.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Tale of Heroics and Heartbreak: Dave Houghton’s Masterclass and Martin Crowe’s Magic

It was late afternoon on October 10, 1987. The ball hung in the air for what seemed like an eternity. Dave Houghton’s eyes followed its arc, willing it to carry just a little further. The fate of an extraordinary contest rested on that streak of red leather, suspended in time and tension.

The Lal Bahadur Shastri Stadium in Hyderabad had drawn a sizeable crowd, lured not by marquee teams but by the magnetism of the Reliance World Cup. The unsung New Zealand side faced a Zimbabwe team yet to achieve Test status, and yet, the unfolding drama transcended reputations. For those in attendance, this match became a cherished chapter in cricketing folklore.

By the halfway mark of Zimbabwe’s chase, the match adhered to the expected script. New Zealand had posted a competitive 242, built on the measured half-centuries of makeshift opener Martin Snedden and the ever-elegant Martin Crowe. John Traicos, the veteran off-spinner, bowled with precision, conceding a mere 28 runs in his 10 overs. Zimbabwe’s response, however, began in disarray. At 104 for 7, with only Andy Pycroft showing resistance apart from the audacious Houghton, the result seemed inevitable.

Then, the script flipped. Ian Butchart, stoic and unyielding, refused to relinquish his wicket. At the other end, Houghton batted as though possessed, conjuring strokes that bordered on the ethereal. Boundaries flowed with effortless grace to all corners of the ground, punctuated by towering sixes that electrified the crowd. The wicketkeeper-batsman’s innings was a masterclass in controlled aggression, blending technical brilliance with raw power. The Kiwis, so assured moments earlier, began to unravel. Fielding lapses emerged, gaps appeared, and Houghton exploited them with surgical precision.

The partnership between Houghton and Butchart blossomed into a remarkable 117-run stand, transforming despair into hope. The equation narrowed: 22 runs needed from 21 balls. Snedden, returning to bowl, faced a visibly fatigued yet determined Houghton. Spotting the mid-on fielder inside the circle, Houghton seized the moment. With both feet airborne, he unleashed a mighty swing. The ball soared high, seemingly destined to clear the boundary.

Thousands of eyes followed its arc toward the fence. But one pair of eyes remained unwavering—those of Martin Crowe. The Kiwi stalwart, a paragon of athleticism and focus, turned and sprinted toward the long-on boundary. His strides were purposeful, his gaze fixed on the ball. As it threatened to elude him, Crowe launched into a full-stretch dive. Time seemed to freeze as his outstretched hands clasped the ball. Against all odds, it stuck. Crowe tumbled and rolled, emerging triumphant with the red cherry still firmly clutched.

It was a moment of cricketing transcendence. Houghton’s miraculous innings—an epic 142 off 137 balls adorned with 13 fours and 6 sixes—had been extinguished by an equally miraculous catch. Disbelief hung in the air. Houghton, stunned, walked back in silence, while Crowe, perhaps equally astonished, marvelled at his own feat. The stadium reverberated with a mix of awe and heartbreak as Zimbabwe’s hero departed.

In the end, Zimbabwe fell agonizingly short, losing by just three runs. Yet, this match was far more than a narrow defeat for the minnows. It was a testament to cricket’s unpredictable beauty, where individual brilliance and collective resilience can momentarily rewrite destiny. Houghton’s innings and Crowe’s catch remain immortalized, a poignant reminder that in cricket, as in life, the journey often outshines the destination.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Sri Lanka: The Decade-Breaking Lions

In the annals of Test cricket, few teams have the knack for disrupting dominance quite like Sri Lanka. In 1995, they ended Pakistan’s decade-long home supremacy, and in 2024, history repeated itself. Pakistan’s fortress, carefully guarded over ten years, has been breached once again by the resilient Lankan Lions. This is no coincidence—it is a testament to Sri Lanka’s ability to rise against the odds, even when branded as underdogs. 

For Sri Lanka, this victory is more than just a series win; it is a resurrection. Once teetering on the brink of irrelevance in the Test arena, this triumph marks a significant turning point. It is a reminder that transitions, however daunting, can lead to triumph with perseverance and faith. 

A Victory Against the Odds 

Sri Lanka entered the series against Pakistan as the definitive underdogs. Their Test side, long overshadowed by the retirement of legends and plagued by inconsistency, was seen by many as a team in decline. Yet, cricket has a way of rewarding faith, and for those who believed in the Lankan Lions, this series was a vindication. 

This victory was not merely a result of skill but also of sheer will. The Lankan players, coaches, and fans deserve every accolade for pulling off a series win that seemed improbable at the outset. Their journey from near obscurity to conquering a formidable opponent on foreign soil is nothing short of inspiring. 

Pakistan: A Tale of What Could Have Been 

For Pakistan, this series will be remembered as an opportunity lost. Their batting, a traditional stronghold, faltered when it mattered most. In both Tests, moments of brilliance were overshadowed by collective lapses, leaving Sarfraz Ahmed’s side with more questions than answers. 

The dressing room mood will undoubtedly be sombre. For Sarfraz, a captain who gave everything on the field, this defeat will be hard to digest. Yet, defeats often serve as the harshest yet most valuable teachers. Pakistan must now reflect on their mistakes—not to dwell on them, but to learn and rebuild. 

Drama in Abu Dhabi: A Tale of Two Collapses 

The first Test in Abu Dhabi was a slow burner, with attritional cricket dominating the first four days. The final day, however, was a different story. Wickets tumbled in a frenzy, transforming a sedate match into a nail-biter. Yasir Shah triggered a Sri Lankan collapse, only for Pakistan to crumble spectacularly while chasing a modest target of 136. 

The drama was quintessentially Pakistani—unpredictable, thrilling, and nerve-wracking. It was less about Rangana Herath’s brilliance and more about Pakistan’s flair for the unexpected. The joy of Sri Lankan players and fans was matched by the collective sigh of disbelief from Pakistan supporters. 

Dubai: A Rollercoaster of Emotions 

The second Test in Dubai followed a similar script of unpredictability. After conceding a massive 220-run deficit in the first innings, Pakistan’s bowlers, led by Wahab Riaz and Yasir Shah, mounted a stunning comeback. Haris Sohail, the surprise package, joined the fray, and Sri Lanka were bundled out for a mere 96 in their second innings. 

Under the lights, Wahab Riaz delivered a spell of hostile pace bowling that sent chills down the spine. Yasir Shah complemented him with relentless accuracy, while Haris Sohail added crucial breakthroughs. Suddenly, a match that seemed lost became a 50-50 contest. 

Chasing 317, Pakistan found themselves at 52 for 5, staring at yet another collapse. But Asad Shafiq and Sarfraz Ahmed had other plans. Their partnership revived hope, turning the chase into a dramatic spectacle. Yet, as the dust settled, it was Sri Lanka who emerged victorious, celebrating a hard-fought series win. 

The Unpredictable Gift of Pakistan Cricket 

While Sri Lanka deservedly claimed the series, Pakistan’s unpredictable nature made it unforgettable. Their ability to oscillate between brilliance and chaos is both their greatest strength and weakness. It is this unpredictability that keeps fans glued to the screen, ensuring that no match involving Pakistan is ever devoid of drama. 

In an era where Test cricket often struggles for relevance, Pakistan’s flair for the dramatic is a blessing. Their penchant for making the simple seem impossible and the impossible seem achievable ensures that the format retains its allure. 

Lessons and Legacies 

For Sri Lanka, this series is a stepping stone to a brighter future. It should instil confidence in a team that has often doubted itself. For Pakistan, it is a wake-up call—a reminder that dominance, however long, is fragile without consistent performances. 

As the cricketing world celebrates this thrilling series, it is a moment to reflect on the beauty of Test cricket. In an age dominated by commercial interests, this series was a testament to the enduring charm of the longest format. 

Sri Lanka’s victory is a reminder that underdogs can roar, transitions can lead to triumph, and Test cricket, despite its challenges, remains the pinnacle of the sport.  

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Duel of Grit and Glory: England's Thrilling Triumph Over West Indies in the 1987 World Cup

The Indian subcontinent buzzed with excitement and anticipation as it prepared to host the World Cup for the first time, breaking free from England’s traditional grasp on the tournament. In the second game of the 1987 Reliance World Cup, England faced the mighty West Indies, former champions with a reputation for dominance.

While most teams tailored their strategies to the spin-friendly surfaces of the subcontinent, England defied convention. They opted for a pace-heavy attack featuring Phil DeFreitas, Neil Foster, Gladstone Small, and Derek Pringle, supported by the lone off-spinner, John Emburey. This decision would come under scrutiny, especially as the advantages of a balanced bowling attack became evident against the West Indies.

The West Indies’ innings began with early setbacks as Carlisle Best and Desmond Haynes departed cheaply. However, Viv Richards and Richie Richardson steadied the ship, combining sharp running between the wickets with elegant boundary strokes. It was Foster who broke the partnership, dismissing both Richards and Richardson in quick succession. Emburey was introduced soon after, and though he remained wicketless, his precision and control stifled the West Indies’ scoring rate. Conceding just 22 runs from his 10 overs, including a maiden, Emburey proved to be a quiet but significant thorn in the West Indian batting lineup.

With Emburey out of the attack, the West Indies found their rhythm. Jeff Dujon and Gus Logie unleashed a counterattack, dismantling the English pacers, particularly Pringle and Foster. Dujon’s run-out momentarily stemmed the flow of runs, but Roger Harper took up the mantle, smashing 22 off Pringle’s final over, the penultimate of the innings. Logie fell for a brisk 41-ball 49, and Harper’s cameo of 24 from 10 balls ended when Small rattled his stumps. From a modest 151 for 4 at the 40-over mark, the West Indies accelerated to a formidable 243 for 7, plundering 92 runs in the final 10 overs.

Chasing 244 was always going to be a challenge for England, especially without Ian Botham. Their task was further complicated by the fiery West Indian pace trio of Patrick Patterson, Courtney Walsh, and Winston Benjamin, complemented by the spin of Harper and Carl Hooper.

England’s innings began poorly, with Chris Broad edging Walsh to wicketkeeper Dujon and Tim Robinson’s ill-fated run-out adding to the early woes. Mike Gatting and Graham Gooch offered brief resistance, adding 58 runs in nine overs, but Hooper’s off-breaks proved too clever for them. Once the duo departed, England’s middle order crumbled under pressure.

Allan Lamb stood as the lone beacon of hope, crafting a gritty knock while wickets tumbled around him. He found a brief ally in Pringle, but Hooper’s sharp fielding ended Pringle’s stay, leaving England teetering at 123 for 5. Paul Downton’s brief appearance ended in a run-out, and Emburey’s arrival brought a flicker of hope. Emburey’s quickfire 22, including a four and a six, injected momentum before Patterson’s searing yorker sent his stumps cartwheeling. At 162 for 7, England needed 82 runs from 54 balls, with their chances hanging by a thread.

Enter DeFreitas, whose fearless approach turned the tide. Lamb and DeFreitas stitched together a vital 47-run partnership, taking the attack to the West Indies. DeFreitas’s brisk 23 off 21 balls ended with another Patterson special, but his contribution had kept England in the hunt. Foster joined Lamb with 35 runs required from the final three overs.

The tension peaked as Walsh’s penultimate over leaked 16 runs, 15 of them from Lamb’s blade. Patterson’s final over tightened the screws, conceding just six runs and leaving England needing 13 from the last six balls. Walsh, under immense pressure, faltered. Four leg-side wides, a no-ball, and a boundary from a full-toss gifted England the edge. Foster’s composed strike to the fence sealed a famous victory, with Lamb unbeaten on a masterful 67 off 68 deliveries, featuring five boundaries and a six.

This dramatic encounter was a testament to the unpredictability of cricket, where grit and determination can triumph over adversity. England’s calculated gamble on Lamb’s brilliance and DeFreitas’s audacity turned a seemingly lost cause into a moment of World Cup glory, etching this game into the annals of cricketing history.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

 

A Clash for the Ages: India vs. Australia, 1987 World Cup Thriller

 

The 1987 World Cup delivered countless moments of cricketing brilliance, but few matches stand out as vividly as the Chennai encounter between defending champions India and eventual winners Australia. The clash on that sultry October day remains etched in memory as one of the greatest contests in the tournament's storied history, a testament to the unpredictability and drama of cricket.

The Prelude: A Battle of Strategies

India, led by the charismatic Kapil Dev, won the toss and elected to field. The decision, perhaps influenced by the humid conditions, proved to be a double-edged sword. Australia, guided by their shrewd skipper Allan Border, came prepared with a meticulous game plan. Openers Geoff Marsh and David Boon executed it to near perfection, crafting an opening partnership of 110 runs that laid the foundation for a daunting total.

Marsh, the architect of Australia’s innings, compiled a masterful 110, blending patient accumulation with precise stroke play. Boon’s 49 complemented Marsh’s knock, as the pair nullified the Indian bowlers on a pitch offering little assistance. As Marsh later reflected, "It was important to bat first and create pressure. For that, one of us had to stay there, which I did."

Dean Jones, an integral part of the Australian middle order, highlighted the meticulousness of their approach: "One of the rules inscribed on our kitbags was: 'To lose patience is to lose the battle.' We focused on rotating strike and taking singles, making the opposition’s fielding look ragged."

The Six That Wasn’t—Or Was It?

A moment of controversy arose during the innings when Jones lofted Maninder Singh towards long-on. Ravi Shastri leapt at the boundary but signalled the ball had landed inside the rope. Umpire Dickie Bird took Shastri’s word, awarding four runs. However, Australian coach Bobby Simpson, observing from close quarters, insisted it was a six. Post-innings discussions ensued, and Kapil Dev, embodying the spirit of the game, agreed to adjust the score. The Australian total was revised to 270—a decision that would later prove pivotal.

India’s Fiery Response: A Tale of Momentum

India’s chase began with a flurry of aggression. Sunil Gavaskar, often criticized for his conservative approach in ODIs, unleashed an uncharacteristic onslaught, smashing 37 off 32 balls. His partner, Krishnamachari Srikkanth, dazzled with a 70-run blitz, leaving the Australians scrambling. Debutant Navjot Singh Sidhu, shedding his "strokeless wonder" tag, showcased audacious hitting, racing to 73 off 79 deliveries. By the time India reached 207 for 2, victory seemed a foregone conclusion.

Dean Jones aptly summarized the shift in Indian mindset: "It was surprising to see Sunny take the lead. He set the tempo and lifted the entire team’s confidence."

The Turning Tide: McDermott’s Spell of Magic

Just as India appeared poised for a comfortable win, Allan Border turned to Craig McDermott. The pacer’s second spell proved transformative. Mixing pace with cunning off-cutters, McDermott dismantled India’s middle order, sending Sidhu, Mohammad Azharuddin, and Dilip Vengsarkar back to the pavilion in quick succession. Ravi Shastri fell to a deceptive slower ball, leaving India’s lower order to navigate a mounting crisis.

"McDermott was like a racehorse," Jones remarked. "Once he got his confidence, he grew stronger and better. His 'gorilla teeth' were out, and the bite was real."

The Final Act: Drama at the Death

Even with McDermott’s heroics, India needed just 16 runs off the last four overs with four wickets in hand. But pressure can reduce even champions to mere mortals. Kapil Dev’s dismissal off Simon O’Donnell’s bowling triggered a collapse. Binny’s ill-advised dash for a single led to a run-out, and Kiran More’s brief resurgence ended with a miscalculation.

With six runs required off the final over, No. 11 Maninder Singh faced Steve Waugh. A couple of well-placed shots brought India close, needing two runs off two balls. Then came the unthinkable. Waugh’s straight delivery uprooted Maninder’s stumps, sealing India’s fate at 269—agonizingly short by a single run.

The Aftermath: A Match for the Ages

The six—or four—that sparked controversy ultimately decided the outcome. Bob Simpson reflected, "It may have seemed like good fortune for us, but it was right."

The loss was a bitter pill for India, yet it underscored cricket’s inherent unpredictability. For Australia, it was a stepping stone towards their maiden World Cup triumph, solidifying their status as a cricketing powerhouse.

This match remains a symbol of cricket’s glorious uncertainty, where every run, decision, and moment can alter the course of history.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Bangladesh Cricket Board needs to take constructive steps

Bangladesh registered their second successive humiliating defeat. While the first Test extended to final day, the second ended within two and half days. On the third day, the visitors surrendered meekly and failed to occupy the crease on a track which flat and very good for batting. Technically and temperamentally, Bangladesh have been so mediocre as a batting and bowling unit, it’s hard to point fingers towards the track or get excited about the bowling of South African bowlers.

On both the occasions, the tracks were flat. South Africa’s bowling unit did not have that firepower in first Test and in second, it was a half-strength attack. Neither their pacers bowled with deceptive pace or unleashed a barrage of short-pitch bowling targeting the ribcage area, still, Bangladesh top and middle order were found wanting.

“About the Bangladeshi batsmen, I don’t know what happened. We just stuck to our plan and at the end of the day they got themselves out”, said Rabada during the press conference after day two of second Test. Rabada’s statement indicates about the lack of application among the batsmen of visiting team.

Bangladesh folded for 172, following on from their first-innings 147, inside one and a half session, on the third day to suffer their heaviest defeat against South Africa in Tests and it would not sensible enough to overlook some matters for the betterment of future.

Rethink about Mushfiqur Rahim’s captaincy

This has not been the first time, but on previous occasions, Mushfiqur Rahim’s defensive mindset proved handy for Bangladesh and his mind-boggling emotional exhibitions made Bangladesh a butt of jokes in front of world cricket. A Test captain needs to be a man of strong personality and blessed with sheer confidence and attacking intent. But sadly, even after playing cricket for twelve years and leading the side for five years, Mushfiq remains fragile emotionally and pragmatic as a leader.

His poor decision at the toss in second Test even surprised Faf du Plessis and made him mock at Mushfiq. On the field, he was a confused leader, who did not know what he was doing and with the bat, he failed to lead from the front. He never learned from his mistakes.

The time has come for Bangladesh cricket’s fraternity to rethink about Mushfiq’s role as a Test captain. Bangladesh need a captain who is not defensive and emotionally fragile as Mushfiq and at the moment, it seems, Tamim Iqbal is the ideal choice to lead Bangladesh in white clothes.

Imrul Kayes and Soumya Sarkar need a break

Imrul Kayes kept on expressing his wish to play as an opener towards the local press and his wish came true in South Africa. But sadly, he failed to prove a point. The manner of his dismissals was soft. Whereas, Soumya Sarkar frustrated me big time. I invested my faith in him and thought he would rectify his mistakes. But he was also the victim of poor technique. Avoiding an angled bat outside the offstump against pace bowlers is a basic thing and if Soumya fails to keep his bascis right at this level, I think, he needs a break from Tests. And definitely, Kayes also needs a break to rediscover himself.  

So, Bangladesh would be left with the task of finding an ideal opening partner for Tamim Iqbal in Test cricket. Even though some of the paid local sports journalists and fans in social media are crying about Shahriar Nafees, but BCB need not pay heed to such bullshits and give a hard look at the Under19 squad which did very well last year. Then in the domestic circuit, some of the young guns did cut a very good figure. Batsmen like Saif Hasan, Yasir Ali, Zakir Hasan and co are young and talented boys who are doing well at the moment and can prove their worth as the opening partner of Tamim.     

Is the batting coach good enough?

BCB was not satisfied (!) with the previous batting coach Thilan Samaraweera and did not extend his contract. But the coach whom they appointed in place of Thilan neither had any better first-class career nor any exposure to the international circuit. Even his career as a batting consultant was nothing satisfactory. Moreover, Akram Khan, one of the big bosses of BCB, said, he was appointed to look after the lower middle and lower order batsmen which was quite astonishing.

Anyhow, it seems, Bangladesh forgot to bat in five-day matches as soon as Mark O’Neil was appointed as the batting coach. Even in New Zealand and against some quality attack Bangladesh batters showed enough character while against Rangana Herath at Colombo, temperamentally, Bangladesh batters were at their very best. But at home against Australia and in South Africa, the top and middle order batsmen made silly mistakes. Perhaps, Mark has not been able to carry on the good work done by Thilan. He has failed to create an impact on Bangladesh batters.

His contract was subjected to the standard of coaching and I don’t think, BCB should extend his contract.

Bangladesh need a competent batting coach.

Courtney Walsh has not been impactful like Heath Streak

The arrival of Heath Streak rejuvenated the Bangladesh bowling. Especially, the pace bowlers were at their menacing best. But Streak left the scene last year and BCB roped in the legendary Courtney Walsh. Me and many of Bangladesh cricket fans expected a lot from Walsh, but in the course of time, the pace bowlers of Bangladesh started to lose their shine under him.

Bangladesh bowlers bowl well in patches but not like the kind of aggression and intent which they once bowled under Streak which is a matter of concern for BCB. Walsh has been around the corner for more than one year and by now, he should have been proved someone impactful. But time and again, Bangladesh cricket fans are left to miss Streak.

If Walsh is not delivering well enough, why continue with him?

This Test series should help Bangladesh to rectify their mistakes. Bangladesh’s world is not at a loss due to this defeat, but putting the mistakes under the carpet might prove catastrophic in future. And thus, BCB needs to take stern steps.

Note: This article is published on Cricketsoccer on 08/10/2017 Bangladesh Cricket Board needs to take constructive steps

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Liton Kumar Das: A Beacon of Resilience in Bangladesh's Struggle Against South Africa

The rain-delayed second day of the Test match saw the sun finally shine over the Manuang Oval Cricket Ground in Bloemfontein, but for Bangladesh, the day began in familiar frustration. South Africa’s Hashim Amla and Faf du Plessis, with their trademark class and effortless elegance, cruised to centuries, piling more pressure on Bangladesh’s beleaguered captain, Mushfiqur Rahim. Despite Rahim’s best efforts to curb the runs through defensive tactics, Amla and du Plessis's steady accumulation of runs highlighted the gap in quality, as Faf declared at a dominant 573 for 4.

In an unexpected turn, the injured Imrul Kayes took to the field, opening with Soumya Sarkar. Yet the early South African bowlers, led by Kagiso Rabada, Duanne Olivier, and Wayne Parnell, shattered Bangladesh’s top order with clinical precision. At 65 for 6, the collapse seemed inevitable, and a humiliating defeat loomed large. It was in this moment of despair that Liton Kumar Das emerged, providing a glimmer of hope amidst the wreckage of his team’s failing batting line-up.

Liton Kumar Das: A Moment of Resilience

The situation was dire. Soumya was dismissed cheaply, Mominul was caught behind, and Mushfiq, seemingly flustered, followed his teammates back to the dressing room after a spectacular catch by Temba Bavuma. Mahmudullah Riyad, a man of great temperament in the first innings at Potchefstroom, started with promise but perished to a poor shot against a wide delivery from Parnell. As Bangladesh’s hopes of mounting a respectable reply began to fade, Liton stood resolutely at the crease.

Liton, often a player of great promise but inconsistency, chose the moment to demonstrate his skill and mental fortitude. In the face of the relentless South African pace, he opted not for a defensive mindset but for an intelligent counterattack, reminiscent of classical batting rather than the frantic T20 style that dominates the modern game.

His first boundary came via an edge, but it was his second that showcased his true technique. Parnell, pitching on a good length, was punished with a boundary through long off—Liton had quickly assessed the length and got into position with remarkable clarity. His ability to read the bowler and play with such controlled aggression began to frustrate the South African bowlers.

The Art of Counterattack: Liton’s Mastery

After tea, Bangladesh’s position deteriorated further with the loss of Imrul Kayes and Sabbir Rahman, but Liton remained undeterred. He assumed the role of a calm anchor for the tail-enders, notably Taijul Islam, with great composure and remarkable skill. Liton’s shot selection against South African pacers was outstanding—he exhibited great technique and footwork, especially when confronted by the likes of Rabada.

Rabada, known for his searing pace, was taken on by Liton with remarkable poise. In the 22nd over, Rabada banged in a short ball, and Liton executed a superb hook shot, keeping the ball down on the ground. It was a shot executed with such sublime technique that it stood out as a rare gem in modern cricket, where the hook shot has become less of a common sight.

Liton continued to frustrate Rabada, who switched to a back-of-a-length line outside off. Liton, however, responded with a series of elegant strokes through the offside, two of which were classic boundaries, delivered with perfect timing and balance. Rabada, caught off guard by Liton’s flawless execution, had no answer.

A Lesson in Temperament and Technique

As the innings progressed, Liton’s composure was evident. Against Phehlukwayo, he unleashed a sequence of brilliant boundaries, taking control of the game and dragging Bangladesh out of a seemingly insurmountable hole. His fifty was a milestone, but it was the ease with which he found the gaps, even in the face of relentless pressure, that spoke volumes about his skill and character.

Liton’s partnership with Taijul Islam blossomed into a vital 52-run stand, showcasing his ability to marshal the tail. Phehlukwayo became the next victim of Liton’s calculated aggression, as he dispatched the bowler to all corners of the field, with four boundaries in a single over—a dazzling display of footwork and timing.

However, despite his brilliance, Liton’s innings came to a soft end. Attempting a pull shot against Rabada, he edged the ball to Faf du Plessis, bringing his fine knock to a close. Yet, his effort earned him wide recognition as one of the few bright spots in an otherwise grim batting display by Bangladesh.

Conclusion: A Test of Character

Liton’s innings, though ultimately falling short of what could have been a match-saving knock, provided valuable insight into what Bangladesh need to focus on in their quest for improvement in Test cricket. His batting was a lesson in the right attitude and the right technique. Liton demonstrated that, while the pitch might present challenges, the real test lies in the temperament and approach to the game. His ability to counterattack intelligently, his footwork against pace, and his composure under pressure all point to a player with the potential to be a mainstay in Bangladesh’s Test side.

His performance with both bat and gloves offers hope for Bangladesh’s future in the longer format of the game. Liton Kumar Das has shown that, with the right mental approach, no challenge is insurmountable—a sentiment that should resonate deeply within Bangladesh’s cricketing circle.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Mushfiqur Rahim’s Leadership: A Reflection of Fragility and Missteps

Leadership in cricket, especially at the Test level, is a crucible that demands clarity of thought, tactical acumen, and the ability to inspire. Mushfiqur Rahim’s captaincy during the Bloemfontein Test against South Africa, however, painted a picture of confusion and a troubling lack of accountability. His decisions on the field, compounded by baffling statements off it, not only hurt Bangladesh’s chances but also raised serious questions about his suitability as a leader. 

The Toss: A Gift Squandered 

Winning the toss in cricket is often considered an advantage, offering the captain a chance to dictate terms. Yet, Mushfiqur’s post-match statement—“I think it was my mistake to win the toss”—defies both logic and expectation. This comment, delivered with an emotional undertone, betrayed not only his fragile confidence but also his inability to shoulder responsibility. 

The essence of captaincy lies in using opportunities wisely. At Potchefstroom and Bloemfontein, the toss presented Mushfiqur with a chance to leverage conditions favourable for batting first. Instead, his misreading of the pitch resulted in decisions that left his team vulnerable. To attribute failure to the fortune of winning the toss reflects a mindset unfit for the rigours of Test leadership. 

The real question is not about the toss but about Mushfiqur’s inability to read the track.

Was it the toss or the captain’s judgment that failed Bangladesh? The answer is glaringly obvious. 

The Blame Game: Bowlers and Beyond 

In his post-day press conference, Mushfiqur laid blame on the bowlers, stating, “Our bowling wasn’t up to the standard.” While the bowlers’ performances were not exemplary, this critique conveniently ignored the captain’s role in their ineffectiveness. 

Let us revisit the critical moments: 

1. Field Settings: Starting with only two slips for Mustafizur Rahman, despite favourable conditions, deprived the bowler of attacking options. A leg slip was inexplicably placed, forcing Mustafizur to bowl on middle and leg, playing into Dean Elgar’s strengths. 

2. Bowling Changes: Within the first six overs, Mushfiqur replaced his new-ball bowlers with Rubel Hossain and part-timer Soumya Sarkar—a chaotic rotation that disrupted rhythm and ceded momentum to the South African batsmen. 

3. Defensive Fields: Throughout the first session, defensive field placements allowed the opposition to settle. Aggressive bowling without aggressive fields is akin to a blade without its edge. 

4. Captain’s Positioning: Mushfiqur’s decision to field outside the inner circle, citing instructions from the team management, was perplexing. A captain’s presence in the inner circle is vital for strategy and communication. Delegating this responsibility to others undermined the very essence of his role. 

Blaming the bowlers for failing to execute plans is futile when the plans themselves are flawed. Leadership demands ownership, and Mushfiqur’s reluctance to acknowledge his missteps only deepened the team’s woes. 

The Role of a Captain: Courage, Intelligence, and Autonomy 

Mushfiqur’s claim that he was merely following the team management’s instructions raises a fundamental question: why, then, is he the captain? Cricket, unlike soccer, places the captain at the heart of decision-making. While inputs from coaches and team management are valuable, the captain must have the courage and intelligence to make independent decisions on the field. 

A captain who abdicates this responsibility reduces himself to a figurehead, eroding the team’s trust and morale. Mushfiqur’s remarks not only reflected a lack of autonomy but also hinted at a tendency to deflect blame—a trait unbecoming of a leader. 

The Personality Gap 

Leadership in Test cricket requires more than tactical knowledge; it demands a commanding personality, the ability to inspire confidence, and the resilience to face adversity. Mushfiqur’s repeated missteps and emotional responses suggest a leader struggling under the weight of expectations. 

Contrast this with players like Tamim Iqbal, whose assertive personality and understanding of the game have often been evident. Tamim’s leadership qualities, coupled with his ability to handle pressure, make him a compelling candidate for the role of Test captain. 

The Way Forward 

For Bangladesh cricket to progress, the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) must reevaluate its leadership choices. Mushfiqur Rahim’s tenure as Test captain has been marked by inconsistency, defensive tactics, and an inability to learn from mistakes. While his contributions as a player remain invaluable, leadership may not align with his strengths. 

Investing in a captain like Tamim Iqbal, who embodies the qualities of a modern leader, could rejuvenate the team and instil a sense of direction. Leadership is not about avoiding mistakes but about learning from them and inspiring others to rise above challenges. 

Conclusion 

Mushfiqur Rahim’s captaincy at Bloemfontein will be remembered not for its strategic brilliance but for its misjudgments and misplaced accountability. His comments off the field only underscored the gaps in his leadership. For Bangladesh cricket, this moment should serve as a turning point—a chance to reflect, reassess, and rebuild. Leadership is the cornerstone of success, and it is time for Bangladesh to find a leader who can truly rise to the occasion. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The Enigma of Mushfiqur Rahim’s Captaincy: A Study in Stubbornness

On October 4, 2017, ESPNcricinfo’s South African correspondent, Firdose Moonda, painted a vivid picture of the Bloemfontein pitch ahead of the second Test between South Africa and Bangladesh. Photographs showed a verdant strip, indistinguishable from the outfield, sparking speculation of a pace-friendly track. By the time of the toss, however, the reality was starkly different. Persistent rain had kept the pitch under covers, and what emerged was a dry surface, devoid of the anticipated grass and bounce. It was, as South African captain Faf du Plessis quipped, “a very normal cricket wicket,” ideal for batting first. 

Yet, Mushfiqur Rahim, leading Bangladesh, defied conventional wisdom and chose to field first—a decision that raised eyebrows and evoked ridicule. Du Plessis, with a smirk, encapsulated the incredulity of the moment, remarking, “Nine times out of 10, you bat first.” What followed was a masterclass in poor decision-making and flawed execution, an episode emblematic of Mushfiqur’s troubled captaincy. 

The Repetition of Errors 

Cricket, at its highest level, demands adaptability and a willingness to learn from past mistakes. Yet, Mushfiqur Rahim’s tenure as captain often seemed like a case study in the refusal to evolve. His decisions at Bloemfontein mirrored the errors made just days earlier at Potchefstroom. The toss decision, the defensive field placements, and the chaotic use of bowlers—all pointed to a captain who either lacked awareness or stubbornly resisted the lessons of experience. 

The decision to field first was perplexing enough, but the execution compounded the problem. Mustafizur Rahman, operating with the breeze from the Loch Logan End, was given a defensive field with only two slips and a leg slip—a placement that forced him to bowl on the middle and leg stump, allowing Dean Elgar to score with ease. Subashis Roy, after conceding 15 runs in a single over, was inexplicably replaced by part-time medium-pacer Soumya Sarkar within the first five overs—a move that defied logic on the opening morning of a Test match. By the 10th over, Mushfiqur had already cycled through four bowlers, a pattern more befitting of a club-level game than international cricket. 

Defensive Fields and Aggressive Bowlers 

Even when the Bangladeshi pacers found rhythm post-lunch, Mushfiqur’s defensive field placements undermined their efforts. The aggressive intent of Mustafizur, Rubel Hossain, and Subashis Roy was neutralized by a captain who seemed more intent on damage control than wicket-taking. South Africa’s batsmen, untroubled by the lack of attacking fields, treated the session as a leisurely outing, accumulating runs with ease. 

This recurring pattern of defensive captaincy not only frustrated the bowlers but also highlighted a deeper issue: Mushfiqur’s inability to trust his players and his own instincts. In Test cricket, bold decisions often yield the greatest rewards, but Mushfiqur seemed trapped in a cycle of indecision and fear. 

The Psychological Barrier 

Why does Mushfiqur persist with these flawed strategies? Psychology offers a potential explanation. Experts describe a phenomenon known as choice-supportive bias, where individuals rationalize their decisions post hoc, attributing positive qualities to their choices while downplaying their faults. Mushfiqur’s repeated justifications for his decisions—often couched in emotional or weakly logical terms—suggest a deep-seated reluctance to acknowledge mistakes. 

This bias is further compounded by a tendency to avoid discomfort. Admitting to errors is inherently unpleasant, but it is also the first step toward growth. Mushfiqur’s refusal to confront his missteps creates a self-perpetuating loop: flawed decisions lead to poor outcomes, which are then rationalized, ensuring the cycle continues. 

A Case Study in Leadership 

Mushfiqur’s captaincy offers a fascinating case study for leadership and behavioral psychology. His steadfast adherence to flawed strategies, even in the face of repeated failures, underscores the importance of adaptability and self-awareness in leadership. Neuroscientists and psychologists might find in him a rare subject to study the mechanisms of stubbornness and the barriers to learning from failure. 

For Bangladesh cricket, however, this is no academic exercise. Leadership at the international level is not just about tactics; it is about inspiring confidence, fostering trust, and making decisions that maximize the team’s potential. Mushfiqur’s struggles as captain suggest a disconnect between his role and his natural inclinations—a gap that has often left Bangladesh adrift in critical moments. 

The Way Forward 

To move forward, Mushfiqur must first confront the truth of his own fallibility. Mistakes, while inevitable, are only valuable if they lead to growth. A captain who cannot learn from the past is a liability to his team, no matter how skilled he may be as a player. 

For Bangladesh cricket, the lesson is equally clear: leadership is not just about seniority or individual talent but about the ability to adapt, inspire, and make sound decisions under pressure. As the team continues its journey on the global stage, it must prioritize leaders who embody these qualities, ensuring that the lessons of Bloemfontein are not lost to history. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The Evolution of Cricket: A Battle Between Tradition and Modernity

In 2002, as the Benson & Hedges Cup—one of England's cherished one-day competitions—faded into history, the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) found itself at a crossroads. Seeking innovation to rejuvenate dwindling audiences, ECB marketing manager Stuart Robertson proposed a bold experiment: a 20-over-a-side contest. The concept, narrowly approved by county chairmen in an 11-7 vote, heralded the birth of Twenty20 cricket. On June 13, 2003, this radical format made its debut in the Twenty20 Cup, signaling the dawn of a new era. 

For a purist, the rationale behind this innovation was perplexing. Cricket, long celebrated as a game of patience, strategy, and gradual crescendo, seemed to be veering away from its essence. Test matches and One-Day Internationals (ODIs) had for decades captivated audiences with their intricate narratives. Yet, the emergence of T20 suggested an underlying dissatisfaction—a belief that cricket needed a shorter, more electrifying variant to capture the imagination of modern audiences. 

Initially, T20 found its footing within England, but its appeal soon transcended borders. Australia and Pakistan were early adopters, but it was India—the sport’s economic epicenter—that remained aloof. That indifference ended in 2007, when the inaugural ICC World Twenty20 final unfolded in Johannesburg. Misbah-ul-Haq’s ill-fated scoop off Joginder Sharma sealed Pakistan’s defeat, and MS Dhoni’s jubilant hoisting of the trophy ignited a paradigm shift in Indian cricket. What had been viewed as a novelty now became a revelation. 

The Indian Revolution: T20 Finds Its Spiritual Home 

India’s victory in the 2007 World Twenty20 was more than a triumph; it was a catalyst. The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), long a bastion of conservatism, quickly recognized the potential of T20 as a commercial juggernaut. In 2008, the Indian Premier League (IPL) was born—a dazzling amalgam of cricket and entertainment, complete with celebrity endorsements, team franchises, and a carnival-like atmosphere. 

The IPL’s immediate success was unparalleled. Advertisers flocked, audiences swelled, and cricket found itself reimagined as a spectacle. Yet, beneath the glitz lay a deeper concern: the erosion of cricket’s soul. Test cricket, the format where legends are forged and cricket’s artistry is most evident, began to fade into the background. The nuanced battles of attrition that defined Test cricket were overshadowed by the fireworks of T20. 

The IPL’s model proved infectious. Leagues inspired by its formula sprang up across the globe—the Big Bash League in Australia, the Caribbean Premier League, the Pakistan Super League, and the Bangladesh Premier League. Each promised instant gratification, glamour, and lucrative opportunities for players. For traditionalists, this shift was bittersweet. Modernization was inevitable, but the commercialization of the sport raised questions about its long-term impact. 

The Cost of Brevity 

By the 2010s, T20 cricket had monopolized the calendar, shaping a generation of players whose techniques prioritized power over precision. The artistry of constructing an innings or outwitting a batsman over long spells gave way to an urgency that often lacked depth. Cricket’s once-revered traditions became casualties of this transformation, as players and fans gravitated toward the format’s immediacy and spectacle. 

Yet, T20’s meteoric rise brought with it a darker underbelly. The format’s brevity and unpredictability created fertile ground for corruption. As early as 2009, Lord Condon, the former head of the Anti-Corruption and Security Unit (ACSU), warned of the risks. Match-fixing, once challenging to orchestrate in the complexity of Test cricket, found a new haven in T20, where games were decided in a matter of overs, and stakes were amplified by massive viewership. 

The Threat of T10: A Step Too Far? 

As if T20 weren’t condensed enough, the advent of T10 cricket introduced an even shorter format, promising matches completed within 90 minutes. With cricket legends like Virender Sehwag, Chris Gayle, and Shahid Afridi endorsing the format, T10 gained traction. But this reduction raised existential questions: when does innovation become degradation? 

T10 threatens to strip cricket of its very identity. What was once a test of skill, endurance, and strategy risks becoming mere entertainment—a show devoid of the qualities that made cricket unique. The allure of quick money and endorsements increasingly draws players away from Test cricket, the format where true greatness is etched. Shakib Al Hasan’s decision to prioritize T10 over a Test series exemplifies this troubling trend. 

The Existential Crossroads 

Cricket now stands at a precarious juncture. The balance between tradition and modernity is tilting alarmingly toward instant gratification. While T20 and its derivatives have expanded cricket’s global reach, they have also diluted its essence. Test cricket, the pinnacle of the sport, faces an uncertain future as players and audiences shift their loyalties. 

The legacy of cricket’s greats—WG Grace, Don Bradman, Garfield Sobers—was built on the foundations of Test cricket. To lose this format would be to sever cricket from its roots, reducing it to a fleeting spectacle rather than a battle of skill, discipline, and endurance. 

As William Pollard aptly observed, “The arrogance of success is to think that what you did yesterday will be sufficient for tomorrow.” Cricket must evolve, but not at the cost of its soul. The global cricketing community must guard against excess, preserving the balance that has long made the sport a masterpiece. Without Test cricket, and perhaps even ODIs, cricket risks becoming unrecognizable—a game of lights and fireworks, but devoid of its enduring spirit. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Sri Lanka’s Revival: A Victory Against the Odds

When Kumar Sangakkara bid farewell to international cricket, Sri Lanka entered a phase of uncertainty—a familiar yet daunting period of transition. While the emergence of new talents offered glimpses of hope, the results on the field painted a grim picture. Defeats piled up, and the once-proud cricketing nation found itself struggling to stay competitive. Transition, a term often used to soften the blow of such setbacks, began to wear thin as humiliations became more frequent. 

The nadir came when Sri Lanka succumbed to low-ranked teams, sides that barely played active cricket. These losses were not just defeats but symbolic of a deeper malaise. A heavy thrashing on home soil without putting up even a semblance of resistance amplified fears that Sri Lanka might be heading down the same path as the West Indies—a cricketing powerhouse unable to navigate the void left by its legends. 

What Sri Lankan cricket desperately needed was a spark, a morale-boosting victory to reignite belief and uplift a team searching for its identity. The question, however, was when and where that spark would come. 

A Test of Resolve in Abu Dhabi 

The first Test against Pakistan in Abu Dhabi seemed poised to deliver yet another blow to Sri Lanka’s fragile confidence. Chasing a modest 136 on the final day, Pakistan appeared to be in control. Yasir Shah had spun a web around Sri Lanka earlier, and the hosts seemed destined to cruise to victory. 

But Test cricket, as always, had other ideas. Its beauty lies in its unpredictability, and when Pakistan is involved, drama is never far away. 

Enter Rangana Herath, the veteran spinner whose guile and perseverance epitomized Sri Lankan cricket’s fighting spirit. With Pakistan’s top and middle order crumbling under pressure, Herath turned the game on its head. From a position of comfort, Pakistan spiraled into chaos, losing ten wickets on the final day—a collapse that has become alarmingly familiar for them in recent years.  

Since 2016, Pakistan has lost ten wickets in a fourth-innings chase on five occasions, with another instance where nine fell in quick succession. This vulnerability on the final day, reminiscent of Bangladesh’s struggles, once again reared its head. 

The Significance of Victory 

For Sri Lanka, this was more than just a win; it was a moment of catharsis. After months of despair and self-doubt, they had orchestrated one of the most dramatic comebacks in recent Test history. The victory in Abu Dhabi not only ended a streak of disappointments but also provided a much-needed injection of confidence to a team in transition. 

Herath’s spell symbolized resilience, a reminder of what Sri Lanka could achieve when they combined skill with belief. It was a performance that harkened back to the glory days, offering a glimmer of hope that the future might not be as bleak as it once seemed. 

A Triumph for Test Cricket 

This victory was not just important for Sri Lanka but for Test cricket itself. In an era where the longest format often finds itself overshadowed by the glitz of T20 leagues, such dramatic turnarounds reaffirm its unique charm. The sight of a team clawing its way back from the brink, defying the odds to script an improbable win, is what keeps the format alive and cherished. 

Sri Lanka’s triumph serves as a reminder that transitions, while painful, can also be transformative. It is never easy to replace legends, but moments like these show that the road to recovery is paved with resilience and belief. For Sri Lanka, the win in Abu Dhabi was not just a victory; it was a statement—a declaration that they still belong among the elite. 

In the grander narrative of cricket, this victory was a beacon of hope, a testament to the enduring spirit of the game.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Fearsome Heights: The Evolution of Fast Bowling from the Caribbean to the Transvaal

 In the golden age of fast bowling, the West Indies unleashed a battery of towering pacemen who not only terrorized batsmen but also captivated spectators with their raw power and imposing presence. Joel Garner, standing at a staggering 6'8", bowled with a windmill-like action that seemed to summon tempests. His expressionless visage after each delivery was as chilling as his toe-crushing yorkers. Garner didn’t need theatrics; his very existence on the pitch was a nightmare personified. If one were to imagine him with wings and fangs, he’d be the perfect casting choice for a Dracula movie. 

Then came Curtly Ambrose, the 6'7" Antiguan colossus whose piercing glare and menacing aura could make even the bravest batsmen wilt. The fifth Test at Perth in 1993 remains etched in memory—not just for his fiery spells but for the sheer terror he exuded. His red eyes and steam-like intensity gave him the demeanour of a predator stalking its prey, ready to deliver the final blow with a snorter aimed at the ribs. 

For fans of fast bowling, these "Eiffel Tower" pacemen were the ultimate thrill—unpredictable, unrelenting, and unforgettable. 

The Gentle Giant from Transvaal 

Fast forward to the modern era, and the fearsome archetype found an unlikely outlier in Morne Morkel. At 6'5", Morkel had the physique of a destroyer but the demeanour of a gentleman. With his disarming smile and boy-next-door charm, he seemed more likely to offer you a cup of tea than a searing bouncer. 

Yet, beneath the calm exterior lay a predator of a different kind. Morkel’s journey began humbly, bowling to Jacques Kallis in the nets as a nervous youngster. Ray Jennings, his mentor, introduced him to South Africa’s finest, and Kallis immediately saw the potential. “He should be playing for South Africa,” Kallis remarked. Three years later, Morkel was sharing the dressing room with the great all-rounder, and the rest is history. 

For much of his career, Morkel lived in the shadow of Dale Steyn, whose fiery temperament and devastating spells often stole the limelight. Morkel’s Achilles’ heel—a chronic issue with overstepping—also undermined his reputation. Yet, when the stars aligned, Morkel’s spells were symphonies of destruction, and the world witnessed the quiet giant transform into a panther on the hunt. 

The Panther Awakens: Potchefstroom 

Day 4 of the first Test at Potchefstroom was a stage set for Morkel to remind the world of his prowess. Under gloomy skies, the Bangladesh batsmen faced a predator in full flight. 

His opening delivery was a harbinger of doom—a full-length ball angled in from wide off the crease, swinging late at 140 km/h. Tamim Iqbal managed to defend it, but the unease was palpable. Morkel’s run-up was smooth, his grip on the red cherry firm, and his intensity unmistakable. 

The fourth ball of the over was a masterpiece. Wide off the crease, Morkel delivered a length ball that deviated sharply, sneaking past Tamim’s defences to rattle the stumps. It was the kind of delivery that would have tested even the greatest—be it Viv Richards or Don Bradman. 

Mominul Haque, fresh off a strong performance, was the next victim. Another length ball, delivered with precision, thudded into his pads before he could decide whether to move forward or back. The umpire’s finger went up, and Mominul walked off, a picture of disbelief. 

Bangladesh captain Mushfiqur Rahim was then undone by a nip-backer that shattered his stumps. However, fortune intervened as Morkel had overstepped—his 14th no-ball in Test cricket. The no-ball curse cut short what could have been a career-defining spell. Soon after, a thigh strain forced Morkel off the field, and the Bangladesh batsmen heaved a collective sigh of relief. 

Aggression Redefined 

“Aggression with the ball is being able to bowl at 90mph for an entire day in a Test match, to have good body language, and even if you are leaking runs, never show the batsman that he is on top of you,” Morkel once said in an interview. At Potchefstroom, he embodied this ethos. His spell was a masterclass in controlled aggression—precise, unrelenting, and devastating. 

For Bangladesh, it was a harsh lesson in the unforgiving nature of Test cricket. For Morkel, it was a reminder of his enduring brilliance. While he may lack the theatrical menace of Garner or Ambrose, Morkel’s spells carry a quiet ferocity that is no less effective. 

The gentle giant from Transvaal proved that he doesn’t need red eyes or fearsome glares to haunt batsmen. When the panther is on the prowl, even the bravest find themselves in disarray.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Mominul Haque: Rediscovering the Art of Resilience

Once heralded as Bangladesh cricket’s brightest Test prospect, Mominul Haque found himself grappling with an alarming slump in form that nearly erased him from the national conversation. From averaging an impressive 51.17 in 2014, his numbers plummeted to 36.86 in 2015, 23.50 in 2016, and 28.25 in 2017. This downward spiral culminated in his exclusion from the 14-man squad for the Test series against Australia, a decision that sent ripples through Bangladesh’s cricketing fraternity.

The backlash from fans and journalists was swift and severe. At the press conference, chief selector Minhajul Abedin faced intense scrutiny but remained composed. "Mominul made just one fifty in the last six innings. He was dropped because of his form," he asserted, adding, “Others are ahead of him based on current performance.” Despite the controversy, Mominul’s fortunes shifted dramatically. An eye infection sidelined Mosaddek Hossain, and following intervention from BCB President Nazmul Hassan, Mominul was drafted back into the squad.

However, the comeback was far from triumphant. In the second Test, batting at his favoured number four in the first innings, he showed flashes of his old self before faltering. An uncharacteristic stint at number eight in the second innings only magnified his struggles. Critics sharpened their knives, and questions loomed over his place in the squad.

A Test of Character: South Africa Beckons

With a drawn series against Australia behind them, Bangladesh faced an intimidating tour to South Africa. For Mominul, it was a chance to prove he belonged at the highest level. The challenge was daunting, as Morne Morkel and Kagiso Rabada unleashed a barrage of pace and aggression. When Imrul Kayes departed early, Mominul was thrust into the fray at number three—a position where his average of 38.14 hardly inspired confidence.

Faced with adversity, Mominul drew upon the lessons of a previous encounter against New Zealand, where he had counterattacked to rescue his team from 8 for 2. This time, he chose a different path. Eschewing his natural flair, he opted for patience and discipline. The result? A gritty 77 that spoke volumes about his determination to adapt and evolve.

Technical Evolution: Breaking Down the Knock

Mominul’s innings was more than just a display of resilience; it was a masterclass in adapting technique under pressure. 

Occupying the Crease

Understanding his precarious form, Mominul prioritized survival over flamboyance. Early nerves were evident, but his resolve to spend time at the crease allowed him to regain rhythm. With each passing over, his confidence grew, and he began to craft his innings with measured precision.

Straightening the Bat Path

A significant flaw in Mominul’s recent technique had been the angle of his bat during defence. On Day 2, his bat came down toward the second slip, disrupting his balance and leaving gaps between the bat and pad. By Day 3, these issues had been rectified. His straight bat and improved alignment enabled him to time his drives exquisitely, anchoring the innings with authority.

Masterful Footwork

Keshav Maharaj, South Africa’s wily spinner, posed a formidable challenge with his variations. Mominul’s response was a lesson in footwork. Dancing down the track, he disrupted Maharaj’s length and used his supple wrists to convert threatening deliveries into scoring opportunities.

Back Foot Trigger

On South African pitches, the initial trigger movement often dictates success. Mominul mirrored the techniques of greats like Sachin Tendulkar and Brian Lara, whose backward movement allowed them to play late and under their eyes. This adjustment was instrumental in countering Rabada and Morkel’s pace and bounce.

Redemption and the Road Ahead

Mominul’s knock was a beacon of hope—not only for him but for Bangladesh cricket. In rediscovering his form, he reminded selectors, critics, and fans of his immense value to the team. For the Tigers, consistency at the top order is a necessity, not a luxury. Mominul’s resurgence could be the spark that reignites his career and strengthens Bangladesh’s Test aspirations.

While one knock doesn’t silence critics, it can shift the narrative. Mominul Haque’s innings was not just a score on the board; it was a statement—a testament to grit, adaptability, and the unyielding spirit of a player unwilling to fade away.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar