Note: This article has been published at Cricketsoccer on 29/07/2018 It was Mashrafe’s series
Thank You
Faisal Caesar
This stand
was not about Tamim Iqbal’s uncharacteristic caution or Shakib’s calculated
restraint. Instead, it was a display of tactical acceleration—relying on deft
touches, strike rotation, and occasional boundaries to keep the asking rate
within reach. With every run, the West Indian bowlers appeared increasingly
bereft of ideas, while their captain, Jason Holder, looked on helplessly as the
match slipped away.
Bangladesh’s
asking rate escalated as the innings progressed, but the confidence and poise
of Mushfiqur and Mahmudullah made it feel like the game was theirs to lose. And
lose it they did, in a heart-stopping finale that epitomized Bangladesh’s
recurring struggles in close encounters.
The Turning Point: A Run-Out and a Risk
Mahmudullah’s
untimely run-out brought Sabbir Rahman to the crease. Together with Mushfiqur,
Sabbir began to complement the latter’s aggression. The chase seemed firmly
under control until Keemo Paul dismissed Sabbir in the final ball of the
penultimate over, leaving Bangladesh needing eight runs from the last six
balls.
With
Mushfiqur Rahim—the team’s most experienced finisher—still at the crease, the
equation seemed manageable. Memories of his match-winning exploits against
India in the Asia Cup six years ago resurfaced, filling fans with cautious
optimism. But cricket, as always, had its own script.
The Final Over: A Moment of Misjudgment
Jason
Holder’s first delivery of the last over was a full toss—an error that should
have been punished with clinical precision. Instead, Mushfiqur opted for a
glory stroke, aiming to seal the match with flair. The ball soared towards the
midwicket region, his favoured area, but instead of crossing the boundary, it
found the fielder’s hands.
It was a
soft dismissal, one that even Holder seemed surprised by. Mushfiqur’s
strength—his ability to target the midwicket region—had once again proved to be
his undoing. The West Indies clung to a narrow three-run victory, and
Bangladesh was left to rue yet another lost opportunity.
A Pattern of Heartbreaks
The critics
and fans were unforgiving, citing a litany of similar instances where Mushfiqur
had faltered under pressure. Captain Tamim Iqbal’s post-match remarks captured
the collective frustration:
“It is not
the first time we have lost a close encounter. It has happened quite a few
times in the recent past. It is very disappointing that we are not learning
from our mistakes. We should have finished the game easily, but unfortunately,
we could not.”
At the
centre of this recurring narrative is Mushfiqur Rahim—a player celebrated for
his skill but increasingly scrutinized for his decision-making in critical
moments.
The Missing Ingredient: Planning Under Pressure
Why does
Bangladesh, and Mushfiqur in particular, crumble under pressure so often? The
answer lies not merely in temperament but in the art of planning.
Michael
Bevan, one of the greatest finishers in ODI history, once attributed his
success to meticulous planning and disciplined execution. Bevan emphasized the
importance of understanding the match situation, adapting to the conditions,
and making calculated decisions.
“Even when
it looks hard to score, it’s about being disciplined and carrying out your
plans. One of my goals was to be there till the end. If I was there till the
end, we would win more matches than we lost.”
The
operative word here is “planning.” Bevan’s approach was not about heroics but
about calculated strategy—choosing the right ball, playing to his strengths,
and remaining adaptable to the game’s evolving demands.
Where Mushfiqur Fell Short
In the
final moments of this match, Mushfiqur appeared to abandon the very discipline
that had brought him so close to victory. Rather than continuing the steady
accumulation of runs, he opted for a high-risk shot that defied the situational
demands.
Perhaps he
believed the hard work was already done, that no further planning was required.
But cricket is an unforgiving game, where a single misjudgment can undo an
innings of brilliance. Mushfiqur’s decision to go for the glory stroke, rather
than sticking to his established rhythm, cost Bangladesh the match.
Lessons for the Future
This loss
is not just a missed opportunity but a stark reminder of the importance of
mental fortitude and strategic clarity in high-pressure situations. For
Mushfiqur, it is an opportunity to introspect and refine his approach. For
Bangladesh as a team, it underscores the need to cultivate a culture of
adaptability and resilience.
The path to
becoming a consistent finisher, as Bevan demonstrated, lies in the ability to
stay calm, assess the situation, and make the right decisions—even when the
stakes are at their highest. Bangladesh’s journey in cricket has been marked by
flashes of brilliance and moments of heartbreak. The challenge now is to learn
from these experiences and ensure that close finishes become victories, not
regrets.
In the end, cricket is as much a mental game as it is a physical one. And for Mushfiqur Rahim, the next step in his evolution as a player lies in mastering the mind.
In a
democratic world, personal choice is sacrosanct. Yet, for professional
athletes, individual preferences often collide with the greater responsibility
of representing their nation. Shakib and Mustafiz, under their
exceptional talent, have become icons of Bangladesh cricket. However, it is
Test cricket—the sport’s most demanding and prestigious format—that has
elevated Shakib to global stardom and holds the potential to do the same for
Mustafiz.
The timing
of Nazmul Hassan’s statement could not have been worse. Coming on the heels of
a humiliating Test series defeat against the West Indies, it further fueled
doubts about the commitment and temperament of Bangladesh’s senior players. The
Tigers’ spineless performances raised uncomfortable questions about their dedication
to the format. While defeats are part of the game, losing without a semblance
of fight is a bitter pill for fans to swallow.
A Ray of Hope in Guyana
Just as the
shadow of doubt began to engulf Bangladesh cricket, the team produced a
morale-boosting victory in Guyana. The triumph, though not flawless,
temporarily lifted the gloom and provided a glimmer of hope for the Tigers’
faithful.
At the
toss, West Indies captain Jason Holder expressed little concern over losing,
confident that the dampness in the pitch would dissipate as the match
progressed. Bangladesh’s innings began with Tamim Iqbal and Shakib Al Hasan
adopting a cautious approach, their grafting partnership laying a foundation
that begged for acceleration in the latter stages.
However, it
was Mushfiqur Rahim who rose to the occasion, crafting a masterful innings that
demonstrated the ideal approach to batting on the surface. His knock was a
blueprint of controlled aggression, transforming a middling total into a
competitive one. Bangladesh finished just shy of 250—a score that, while not
imposing, was defendable with disciplined bowling and fielding.
The Bowlers Step Up
Defending
the target, Bangladesh’s bowlers faced the daunting task of containing a West
Indies batting lineup known for its explosive power. Mashrafe Bin Mortaza led
from the front, exploiting the home side’s lack of intent with a display of
guile and precision.
While
Mashrafe excelled, the rest of the attack delivered mixed performances. Mehidy
Hasan Miraz and Mosaddek Hossain provided valuable support, but Shakib and
Rubel Hossain struggled with their lengths, and Mustafizur Rahman appeared
erratic in his early spells before regaining control towards the end.
The West
Indies’ batting effort was uncharacteristically subdued, resembling a
rudderless ship adrift at sea. Their top and middle order faltered, failing to
replicate the heroics of earlier matches on the same pitch. This lacklustre
display ultimately handed Bangladesh a much-needed victory.
A Fragile Redemption
While the
win in Guyana offers a respite, it does not erase the underlying issues
plaguing Bangladesh cricket. The doubts about the team’s consistency and
commitment remain. Success, as the adage goes, has many fathers, but failure is
an orphan. The Tigers’ ability to sustain the momentum from this victory will
determine whether this was a turning point or merely a fleeting moment of
relief.
Bangladesh
cricket stands at a crossroads. The reluctance of senior players to commit to
Test cricket is a symptom of deeper structural and cultural challenges. The BCB
must address these issues with urgency, fostering an environment that values
Test cricket as the ultimate stage for greatness.
For the
players, especially Shakib and Mustafiz, the challenge is twofold: to honour
their immense talent and to recognize the responsibility that comes with
representing a Test-playing nation. The Guyana victory is a reminder that
redemption is possible, but it requires sustained effort, unity, and a
collective will to rise above mediocrity.
The Tigers’ journey continues, fraught with challenges but not devoid of hope. The road ahead demands introspection, resilience, and a renewed commitment to the game’s highest ideals. Only then can Bangladesh cricket truly roar.
For the better part of the last fifteen years, the artistry of a batsman’s willow—be it a silken cover drive, a disdainful pull, or an audacious cut—has dominated the imagination of cricket fans. The focus has shifted from the menacing precision of bowlers like Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Curtly Ambrose, or Glenn McGrath to the elegance of stroke-makers, leaving the bowlers toil in the shadows. In Bangladesh, this shift has been even more pronounced, with the nation’s cricketing identity tethered to its spinners and sporadic batting brilliance.
The
emergence of a genuine Test-quality pace bowler in Bangladesh has always been a
rare event, almost akin to finding an oasis in a desert. The tale of pace
bowling in the country has largely been one of fleeting brilliance. Mashrafe
Mortaza, the trailblazer, was undone by injuries. Mustafizur Rahman, the
prodigy, dazzled briefly but now struggles to reclaim his magic in the longest
format. The likes of Shahadat Hossain, Mohammad Shahid, Rubel Hossain, Al-Amin
Hossain, and Taskin Ahmed have come and gone, leaving behind a trail of
unfulfilled promises.
In this
barren landscape, the emergence of Abu Jayed Chowdhury Rahi offers a glimmer of
hope. Yet, with that hope comes an undercurrent of skepticism, born from years
of watching promising talents fade away.
A Long and Arduous Journey
Jayed’s
rise to the national Test side was anything but meteoric. His first-class debut
in 2010 marked the beginning of a decade-long grind on the unforgiving,
batting-friendly pitches of Bangladesh. While his peers like Taskin Ahmed rose
swiftly through the ranks, Jayed remained on the periphery, honing his craft in
obscurity.
It wasn’t
until 2018, after 1589.4 overs in 109 innings and 64 first-class matches, that
Jayed finally earned his Test cap. Even then, his selection owed as much to
Mustafizur Rahman’s injury as to his own perseverance. Luck, as they say, often
plays a crucial role in cricket, and Jayed’s opportunity came wrapped in
adversity.
Impressions in Antigua and Jamaica
Jayed’s
baptism into Test cricket came under the blazing sun of Antigua, where
Bangladesh’s first innings imploded for a mere 43 runs within an hour. It was a
bitter initiation, but Jayed showed resilience. On a dry wicket offering little
assistance to pacers, his experience on Bangladesh’s flat domestic tracks came
to the fore.
From the
outset, Jayed impressed with his ability to extract movement and consistently
bowl a probing line around the fourth and fifth stump. His hallmark delivery—a
full-length ball that swung back into the batsman—was a rare sight among
Bangladeshi pacers, reminiscent of the skills honed by the greats of the
craft.
In the
second Test at Jamaica, Jayed stepped up another gear. Bowling with increased
pace and generating contrast swing, he troubled the West Indian batsmen
throughout. His seven wickets in two matches at an average of 20.42 were a
testament to his potential. Yet, one couldn’t help but wonder how much more
impactful he might have been had he been utilized more effectively by his
captain on the opening day of the second Test.
The Legacy of Broken Promises
While
Jayed’s performances have been encouraging, the history of Bangladesh cricket
tempers expectations. Promising pacers have often been mishandled, their
careers derailed by injuries, poor management, or a lack of support. The
departures of influential figures like Chandika Hathurusingha and Heath Streak
have left a void in nurturing and guiding young talents.
Jayed’s
journey has already shown his resilience, but sustaining success in Test
cricket requires more than individual grit. The Bangladesh Cricket Board must
shield him from the toxic elements of the cricketing ecosystem—hype,
mismanagement, and the temptation to prioritize shorter formats over the rigours
of Test cricket.
A Glimpse into the Future
Jayed’s
story is still in its early chapters, but it offers a blueprint for what
Bangladesh can achieve with proper planning and investment in pace bowling. His
ability to move the ball both ways, maintain a disciplined line, and adapt to
different conditions marks him as a rare talent in the country’s cricketing
history.
However,
potential is merely the starting point. Jayed’s challenge will be to stay
grounded, continue refining his craft, and avoid the pitfalls that have claimed
so many of his predecessors. Equally, the Bangladesh cricketing hierarchy must
commit to a long-term vision for pace bowling, providing Jayed and others like
him with the resources, mentorship, and opportunities they need to thrive.
In Abu
Jayed, Bangladesh has a flicker of hope. Whether that flicker turns into a
lasting flame will depend on the collective will of the player, the management,
and the cricketing fraternity. For now, Jayed stands as a reminder that amid
the dominance of willow-wielders, the art of pace bowling still has a place in
the game—and in the hearts of those who cherish its timeless allure.
Thank You
Faisal Caesar
WG Grace stands not merely as a legend but as a towering figure whose shadow stretches across the annals of cricketing history. Even among the pantheon of the sport’s immortals, Grace occupies a rarefied space—a colossus among giants, whose presence transcended the boundaries of the 22-yard pitch and etched itself indelibly into the cultural fabric of Victorian England.
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Grace was a
figure of such renown that only Queen Victoria, adorned in her royal regalia,
or perhaps the statesman William Gladstone, rivalled his recognizability. Yet,
for the cricket-loving populace, Grace reigned supreme. He was not merely a
cricketer; he was a symbol, an institution, and an embodiment of the sport
itself. Trains paused for his farewells, porters abandoned their duties for a
handshake, and throngs gathered for a fleeting glimpse of the man whose
stature, both literal and metaphorical, seemed almost mythic.
Grace’s beard, a luxuriant and unmistakable cascade, became
a metaphor for his dominance—a singular feature in an era when facial hair was
a badge of masculinity. Even amidst the verdant thickets of Victorian beards,
Grace’s stood apart, much like his unparalleled achievements with the bat. The
anecdote of Ernie Jones bowling through that bushy marvel, only to apologize
with characteristic humour, epitomizes the blend of reverence and levity that
Grace inspired.
The aura surrounding Grace often threatens to overshadow the
man himself and his extraordinary cricketing feats. His presence on the field
was so magnetic that ticket prices doubled when he played—a testament to his
singular ability to captivate audiences. As GK Chesterton aptly remarked, Grace
was a “prodigious Puck,” a sprite of English cricket whose exploits transformed
the sport from a rudimentary pastime into a symphonic art form. He took the
one-stringed lute of early cricket and fashioned it into a many-chorded lyre,
enriching the game with his innovation and mastery.
The Grace legacy was deeply rooted in Gloucestershire, a county
forever associated with his name. It was here, at Downend, that Dr. Henry Mills
Grace, WG’s father, established a home and a cricketing dynasty. Martha Grace,
WG’s formidable mother, was no passive observer. A towering figure in her own
right, she oversaw the cricketing education of her sons with a discerning eye
and an unwavering commitment. Her scrapbooks chronicling their careers were no
mere mementoes; they were comprehensive records rivalling Wisden in their detail
and precision. Her death, marked by the poignant interruption of a match at Old
Trafford, underscored her irreplaceable role in the family’s cricketing
ascendancy.
WG’s early years were shaped by a rigorous regimen at The Chestnuts, the family home, where cricket was both a pastime and a profession. Under the tutelage of Uncle Alfred Pocock, young WG honed his skills alongside his brothers. The Grace sisters and even the family dogs—Don, Ponto, and Noble—played their part, with Ponto’s fielding skills earning a place in cricketing lore. Such was the cradle of cricketing excellence that nurtured the prodigious talents of WG and his siblings, including the tragically short-lived Fred Grace, whose brilliance was extinguished too soon.
The Graceful Grace:
Unfolding of A Legend
The mythology of WG Grace often obscures the reality of his achievements, but a closer examination reveals a cricketer of unparalleled skill and vision. He was not merely a product of his time but a revolutionary who reshaped the game’s contours. To understand Grace is to grasp not just the man but the epoch he defined—a golden age of cricket illuminated by his genius and sustained by his legacy.
The story of WG Grace begins in a cricketing milieu already
rich with tradition, where the All England Elevens occasionally graced Downend,
pitting their illustrious skills against local teams of twenty-two. The likes
of George Parr, William Caffyn, and Julius Caesar brought the grandeur of the
wider cricketing world to the small town. Even Alfred Mynn, the genial titan
whose exploits had once dominated the cricketing landscape, stood as an umpire
during one such encounter. These visits, steeped in cricketing lore, left an
indelible mark on the young Graces, particularly EM and WG.
It was during one of these matches that William Clarke, impressed by young EM’s deft work as a long-stop, gifted him a bat with a spliced handle reinforced by whalebone—a symbolic passing of the torch to the next generation. For WG, the journey to greatness began with rigorous training, and hours spent at the wicket honing the straight bat, a skill he mastered before reaching double digits in age. Under the watchful eye of Uncle Alfred Pocock, WG internalized the mantra: “Do not allow the bowler to stick you up, or it is all over with you.”Decades later, Grace would reinterpret this wisdom with characteristic flair, proclaiming, “Get at the beggar before he gets at you.”
WG’s formative years were not without tribulation. At 15, he
suffered a life-threatening bout of pneumonia, a moment that could have altered
the trajectory of cricket history. His recovery marked the beginning of a
transformation—he grew into a towering figure, surpassing six feet, with a
physique that set him apart from his brothers, who were shorter and stockier.
WG’s burgeoning athleticism extended beyond cricket; he excelled in 440-yard
hurdles, clocking an impressive 70 seconds at Crystal Palace—a testament to his
versatility and physical prowess.
By the time WG entered First-Class cricket, EM had already
established himself as a formidable batsman, crafty lob bowler, and the finest
point fielder of his era. Yet, WG’s arrival heralded a seismic shift in the
game. Tales of his exploits spread rapidly, and his name became synonymous with
dominance.
Bridging the Chasm:
WG Grace and the Redefinition of Cricket
WG Grace’s career, spanning four decades, is a chronicle of
sustained brilliance punctuated by brief dips and culminating in a remarkable
resurgence in his late forties. His impact was immediate and transformative,
particularly in the storied Gentlemen vs. Players matches. Before WG’s arrival,
the Gentlemen had managed only seven victories in 27 years, often outclassed by
the Professionals’ superior bowling, especially their fast bowlers like George
“Tear ‘em” Tarrant and James Jackson. The amateurs, with their genteel batting,
often crumbled on difficult wickets.
WG changed this dynamic entirely. A player of rare
versatility, he thrived against the fiercest pace, combining staunch defence
with audacious stroke play. Over the next 18 years, the Players managed only
seven wins, a reversal that underscored WG’s influence. His batting prowess
tilted the scales, and his cunning bowling further decimated the Professionals.
WG was, in essence, a professional in spirit, cloaked in the guise of an
amateur—a reality that both enhanced his legend and provoked controversy.
The Chasm of Excellence:
WG and His Contemporaries
From 1868 to 1877, WG’s dominance was unprecedented. He not
only topped the batting averages year after year but often doubled the output
of the next-best batsman. In an era where cricket was still evolving, WG’s
all-around mastery created an enormous gulf between himself and his peers. Even
in 1875, a year he deemed “mediocre,” he finished second in averages while
leading in aggregate runs—a performance that would have been a career highlight
for most others.
This statistical supremacy reflected not just skill but a
profound understanding of the game. WG’s ability to adapt—whether playing on
sticky wickets or against fiery bowlers—set him apart. He brought a
professional rigour to cricket that belied the amateur ethos of the time,
elevating the sport from a pastime to a spectacle of skill and strategy.
Legacy Beyond Numbers
WG Grace was more than a cricketer; he was a cultural
phenomenon. His towering frame, flowing beard, and unparalleled achievements
made him a figure of almost mythical proportions. Yet, behind the legend lay a
man whose work ethic, innovation, and competitive spirit reshaped cricket. WG
did not merely dominate his era; he defined it, setting standards that would
influence generations to come.
To analyze WG’s career is to understand the transformative power of genius in sports. He bridged divides—between Gentlemen and Players, between tradition and modernity—and left a legacy that continues to resonate. WG Grace was not just the best of his time; he was a harbinger of what cricket could become.
WG Grace: The
Colossus of Cricket’s Golden Age
The dry, sunlit summer of 1871 marked the beginning of WG
Grace’s unparalleled dominance in cricket, a period widely regarded as the
zenith of his career. That season, he amassed 2,739 runs at an astounding
average of 78.25, a figure that dwarfed the second-best, Richard Daft, who
managed 37.66. Grace’s 10 centuries that year stood in stark contrast to the
mere two scored by any other batsman. His consistency was such that a rare
failure in one innings was often promptly rectified by a commanding hundred in
the next. His contributions were often so significant that they seemed to
constitute the entirety of his team’s efforts, underscoring his singular
brilliance.
By 1876, the peak of his career, Grace’s dominance had
reached mythical proportions. Contemporary observers remarked, “Modern cricket
seems to have resolved itself into a match between Mr Grace on one side and
the bowling strength of England on the other.”* During one extraordinary week
in August, he produced a series of performances that seemed almost
supernatural: 344 for MCC at Canterbury, followed by 177 at Clifton, and
culminating in an unbeaten 318 at Cheltenham for Gloucestershire. These feats,
performed with a majestic beard that had become his signature, cemented his
status as a living legend.
Master of Both Bat
and Ball
Grace’s all-around prowess was unparalleled. Over his
career, he scored 1,000 or more runs in 28 seasons and exceeded 2,000 on five
occasions. While his batting achievements are rightly celebrated, his bowling
was equally formidable. In 1867, he topped the bowling averages, and during his
peak years—1874, 1875, and 1877—he took the most wickets in addition to
dominating with the bat. Over nine seasons, he claimed more than 100 wickets, a
testament to his versatility and endurance.
At his best, Grace was not only the finest batsman the game
had seen but also one of its most effective bowlers. Few could rival his
all-around contributions, and none could match his ability to single-handedly
dictate the outcome of matches.
The Challenge of Fred
Spofforth
By 1878, Grace had married, become a father, and completed
his medical degree, following in the footsteps of his father and brothers. His
cricketing commitments waned temporarily, but the arrival of Fred Spofforth,
the Australian “Demon Bowler,” rekindled his competitive fire. Spofforth,
unawed by Grace’s towering reputation, dismissed him twice at Lord’s in 1878,
leading to a rare defeat for MCC. English bowlers often joked that Grace should
use a smaller bat to level the playing field, but Spofforth thrived on the
challenge of bowling to the great man. This rivalry spurred Grace to new
heights, including a magnificent 152 on his Test debut in 1880, the first Test
ever played in England.
The Summer in the
Subcontinent of a Cricketing Titan
By the 1890s, Grace’s expanding girth and fondness for food
and whiskey began to tell on his physique, yet his appetite for runs remained
insatiable. The year 1895, when he was 47, marked the Indian summer of his
career. He scored 2,346 runs at an average of 51.00, including nine centuries.
The following year, he added another 2,135 runs at 42.00. These achievements,
at an age when most cricketers had long retired, reinforced his reputation as a
timeless phenomenon.
Even as his dominance waned with the emergence of new talents
like Arthur Shrewsbury, Grace remained the cornerstone of English cricket.
Until 1899, it was unthinkable to form an England XI without him. His final
Test innings, shared with the youthful CB Fry, was marked by a wry
acknowledgement of his advancing years: *“Remember, I am not a sprinter like
you.”* Yet, Grace continued to play domestic cricket, scoring his last
First-Class century the day after his 56th birthday.
The Indomitable
Spirit
In 1888, Archibald Stuart Wortley captured Grace in a portrait that remains displayed in the Long Room at Lord’s. The painting depicts him with bronzed cheeks, a bushy beard, and a stance both balanced and poised for attack. When asked if he would appear as composed in a tight situation, Grace replied with characteristic confidence:“Certainly, because after all I should only be facing the next ball.”
This philosophy epitomized Grace’s approach to the game.
Over his career, he scored 54,211 First-Class runs at an average of 39.25,
including 124 centuries. These numbers, remarkable in any era, are even more
extraordinary when contextualized within the challenges of 19th-century
cricket: treacherous pitches, rudimentary equipment, and the necessity to run
every single run, even for boundaries.
Grace’s batting was not marked by the elegance of Victor
Trumper or the finesse of KS Ranjitsinhji. He lacked the clinical precision of
Jack Hobbs or the explosive power of Gilbert Jessop. Yet, his influence on the
game was unparalleled. As Ranjitsinhji observed, *“He turned batting’s many
straight channels into one great winding river.”
Grace was a pioneer who redefined cricket, elevating it from
a pastime to a profession. His monumental presence at the crease, his strategic
acumen, and his indefatigable energy made him the first true superstar of the
sport. While others have surpassed his records, few have matched his impact. WG
Grace remains not just a figure in cricket history but a symbol of its enduring
spirit.
The Synthesis of
Styles and Master of All
WG Grace was not merely a cricketer; he was a phenomenon, a
synthesis of every batting style known to his era, and the progenitor of
several yet to come. His batting repertoire encompassed the full spectrum of
strokes—forward and back, off-side and leg-side, horizontal bat and vertical
blade. His ability to hit all around the wicket, often for hours on end without
a hint of fatigue, was unmatched. Among his innovations was a hard,
straight-batted push to leg, a stroke uniquely his own. Grace himself summed up
his philosophy succinctly: *“I don’t like defensive strokes; you can only get
three off them.”
Though regarded as a relentless accumulator rather than a flamboyant hitter, his approach was anything but passive. Leaving balls alone—a virtue in the modern game—was anathema to his mindset. Parson Wickham, who once kept wicket during a monumental Grace innings, recalled that WG let only four balls pass untouched throughout the marathon effort, each strike connecting cleanly with the middle of the bat. When the Australians in 1884 accused the English of using bats wider than the rules permitted, Grace’s response was characteristically dismissive: “I don’t care how much they shave off my bat, as long as they leave the middle.”
The Nightmare of
Fielding Captains
Setting a field for WG was an exercise in futility.
Accustomed to playing against odds—teams with 18 or even 22 fielders—he found
gaps with almost supernatural ease when facing the standard eleven. Captains
shuffled their fielders incessantly, only to watch the ball race through the
very spot just vacated. Professional bowlers often celebrated his dismissal
with unrestrained joy. Tom Emmett, after missing a caught-and-bowled chance,
famously flung his cap to the ground in frustration and kicked the ball to the
boundary. Grace, ever the wit, encouraged him: *“Kick it again, Tom; it’s
always four to me.”*
His technique was a study in adaptability. With weight
distributed primarily on his right foot, he could effortlessly move back and
cut deliveries others would tackle on the front foot. Fast and medium pacers,
whom he respected yet relished, bore the brunt of his attacking instincts. Fred
Morley, one of the fastest bowlers of his time, once saw two of his fiery
deliveries hooked for sixes over WG’s eyebrows. On venomous wickets, Grace was
at his indomitable best, earning applause at Lord’s for halting four consecutive
shooters with ease.
Grace’s resilience extended beyond his physical prowess. On
one occasion, after being struck painfully by a slinging delivery from Jack
Crossland, he limped to the boundary, calmed the enraged spectators, and then
returned to the crease to dismantle Crossland’s attack with a ruthless hundred.
His ability to counter adversity, whether from the bowler’s hand or the pitch’s
treachery, exemplified his mental fortitude.
Critics have speculated whether Grace’s dominance would have
persisted in the modern era of restrictive field placements and tactical
bowling. Yet, it is hard to imagine his genius constrained by any era. A brief
frown and a thoughtful tug at his beard might have preceded his adjustments,
but the gaps would surely have revealed themselves, and the runs would have
flowed, as they always did. Genius, after all, transcends time.
The Deceptive Art of
His Bowling
While Grace is celebrated primarily as a batsman, his
bowling was no mere accessory. In his youth, he bowled a round-arm medium pace
that evolved into a slower, craftier style as he aged. His approach was
disarmingly straightforward, yet his deliveries were imbued with guile that
confounded even the best batsmen. Bob Thomas, a veteran umpire, once remarked
that if Grace had not been the greatest batsman, he might well have been the
greatest bowler—a claim perhaps exaggerated but not without merit.
Grace’s bowling statistics speak volumes: 2,809 First-Class
wickets at an average of 18.14, including 240 five-wicket hauls and 64
ten-wicket matches. Such figures demand more than luck; they reflect a deep
understanding of batsmen’s weaknesses and an ability to exploit them. His
bowling style, characterized by a looping trajectory and deceptive flight,
lured many into ill-advised strokes. Even when his bulk swayed the ball into an
unintentional googly, the results were often devastating.
In 1877, against Nottinghamshire, he captured 17 wickets in
a single match, including seven dismissals in 17 balls without conceding a run.
These were not the fortuitous spoils of erratic bowling but the calculated
victories of a bowler who understood the psychology of his opponents.
The Mentor and
Sportsman
Grace’s competitive spirit was tempered by a magnanimous heart. When a young batsman faced him, Grace would often murmur, “I’ll get you out, boy.” And when he inevitably did, he was just as likely to invite the crestfallen youth to the nets the next morning for a lesson on how to play the very ball that had dismissed him. This duality—ruthless on the field yet generous off it—cemented his status not just as a cricketer but as a mentor and ambassador of the game.
Sometimes his medical methods were rather unusual. When a drunken sweep stinking of beer demanded a tonic, WG responded, “What you need lad is exercise and not medicine.” Following this, he called out to his maid, “Mary, fetch my boxing gloves.” The patient rushed out, completely cured, screaming, “The great big b***** wants to fight me!”
FS Ashley Cooper said of his friend, “For years after he left Bristol, poor people would relate how, after a tiring day in the field, he would visit them, not in a professional capacity, but as a friend, doing much to alleviate pain and spread cheerfulness.”
WG’s treatment was often carried out on the cricket field. Joe Hadow made a running catch at deep square leg to dismiss WG and stumbled forward to hit his head against the projecting metal edge of a stand. WG, on his way back to the pavilion, administered first aid with gentle firmness reserved for someone who had made a catch of a genuine six-hit.
More significantly, WG saved the life of old Gloucestershire cricketer and cricket writer ACM Croome in 1887. Croome gashed his throat against one of the spiked railings in front of the pavilion of Old Trafford and the cut was deep and potentially fatal. WG held the jagged edges of the wound together for nearly half an hour as messengers scurried to find surgical needles. WG had been bowling all day but for his stamina and nerve, it would have been near impossible to keep holding the position without twitching his finger or thumb.
There were occasions when he remained up all night with a
difficult case and returned to the ground the next morning to hit a hundred or
pick up a bushel of wickets. And as in his own chamber, sometimes the methods
of medical practice on the field were slightly unorthodox. Kent amateur CJM Fox
stooped sharply to field a hard hit, overbalanced, and put his shoulder out in
the fall. EM ran to him, signalling to the pavilion. WG bustled out and for the
next few minutes, the crowd were treated to a peculiar scene. EM sat on the
unfortunate lad’s head as WG grabbed his arm and began to pull, with his foot
as a fulcrum. After a terrible and painful
pause, a loud crack was heard and the shoulder went back into place. “You’re a
very lucky young man,” WG exclaimed while leaving the field.
The Complete
Cricketer and Compassionate Healer
WG Grace was a man of many facets, each more fascinating
than the last. As a young man, he was an exceptional outfielder, his
athleticism rivalling the best of his time. While he excelled as a cover-point
early in his career, he later gravitated toward the point position, not just
for its strategic advantages but also for the psychological edge it afforded.
Grace relished the opportunity to chatter incessantly to the batsman, employing
a mix of wit, guile, and gamesmanship to unsettle his opponent.
His throwing arm was a marvel of precision and power,
particularly in his youth. His throws from the deep were swift and accurate,
often delivered on the run with a bowler-like action. During the Australian
Aboriginal cricket team’s tour in 1868, Grace triumphed in a throwing
competition, hurling the ball distances of 116, 117, and 118 yards at The Oval.
At Eastbourne, he achieved an astonishing 122 yards, a testament to his raw
athleticism.
While his agility waned with age, his hands remained as
sharp as ever. A contemporary journalist, chronicling his American tour, noted
that the ball seemed “fascinated by Mr. Grace’s basilisk eye, for it seems to
jump into his hand.” Even as his frame grew bulkier, his fielding instincts and
reflexes did not diminish.
Master of All Trades
in the Field
Grace’s versatility in the field was extraordinary. Although
he preferred point to slip—a position he disliked—he occasionally donned the
wicketkeeping gloves when necessity demanded. While his brother EM was often
considered the better fielder in the family, WG was not far behind. He was
particularly brilliant when fielding off his own bowling, charging to positions
like silly mid-off to pull off catches of remarkable brilliance.
One story encapsulates his fielding prowess and indomitable
spirit. Bowling a flighted delivery on the leg stump, he lured the batsman into
a towering shot toward square leg. Grace, with the urgency of a raging bison,
sprinted diagonally across the field, warning the stationed fielder to stand
clear, and completed a stunning catch at full gallop. The batsman, departing in
disbelief, was heard muttering, “That chap won’t be satisfied till he’s keeping
wickets to his bowling.”
WG’s tally of 876 catches in First-Class cricket is second
only to Frank Woolley’s, a testament to his enduring skill and opportunism. His
craft extended beyond athleticism to an almost Machiavellian cunning. The
infamous run-out of Sammy Jones in the 1882 Test—while Jones was distractedly
gardening—illustrates his sharp mind and willingness to exploit any lapse in
concentration. Grace defended his actions as a lesson to the younger player,
though Fred Spofforth’s subsequent bowling rampage and the birth of the Ashes
added a touch of irony to the episode.
Revered by Peers and
Rivals
Grace’s greatness was universally acknowledged, even by his fiercest competitors. When a comparison was drawn between him and Billy Murdoch, Alec Bannerman dismissed the notion with disdain: “Murdoch? Why, WG has forgotten more than Billy ever learnt.” Murdoch himself offered an earthy yet profound tribute: “WG should never be put underground. When he dies, his body ought to be embalmed and permanently exhibited in the British Museum as ‘the colossal cricketer of all time.’”
The Doctor with a Big
Heart
Beyond the cricket field, WG Grace was a physician who
embodied compassion and community spirit. Though he did not pursue his medical
diploma with the same fervour as his centuries, he fulfilled his duties with
dedication and empathy. As a parish doctor in Bristol, serving a largely
working-class community, Grace often treated patients without demanding
payment. His rounds through the streets, clad in a rough tweed suit, were
marked by acts of kindness—whether pausing to chat with children, providing
coal to a family in need, or browbeating friends into offering employment to
the jobless.
Grace’s generosity extended beyond medicine. If a patient’s
home smelled of brewing soup, he would sometimes stay for dinner, blending
seamlessly into the family’s routine. In winter, he became a favourite target
for children’s snowballs. Yet, even in play, Grace’s competitive spirit shone
through; his pickups were swift, his throws accurate, and his retaliation
ensured the young pranksters received a taste of their own medicine.
The Colossal
Cricketer
Grace’s life was a seamless blend of cricketing genius and
human compassion. CB Fry once quipped that WG was the only man to receive a
medical degree for his operations on the cricket field—a jest that underscored
his dominance in both realms. Whether mesmerizing batsmen with his bowling,
orchestrating catches with surgical precision, or tending to the sick with
selfless dedication, Grace was a man whose impact transcended the boundaries of
sport.
His legacy endures not merely in the records he set or the matches he won but in the ethos, he embodied: a relentless pursuit of excellence, a love for the game, and a profound humanity that endeared him to all who crossed his path. To call him the “colossal cricketer” is to capture only a fraction of his greatness. WG Grace was, and remains, a towering figure in the annals of cricket and life.
The Legend, the Lore,
and the Laughter
WG Grace, the towering figure of cricket’s golden age, is as
much a product of historical fact as of the vibrant folklore that surrounds
him. Stories about him blur the line between reality and myth, creating a rich
tapestry of anecdotes that are as entertaining as they are revealing of the man
behind the legend.
Did Grace really tell an umpire that the crowd had come to
watch him bat, not to see umpiring decisions? Did he replace the dislodged bails
and continue batting, dismissing the moment as if it had never happened? Did he
attribute fallen bails to a “strong westerly” wind? And did he nonchalantly
grunt “The Lady” when the opposition captain spun the coin, choosing to bat
regardless of whether Queen Victoria or Britannia graced the toss?
The truth of these tales is elusive. Too much time has
passed, and the factual fragments are inseparably intertwined with the
apocryphal enormity of Grace’s mythos. Yet, these stories endure, told and
retold with the knowing caveat: “Just the sort of thing the Old Man would have
done.”
The Wit and Wisdom of
the Great Cricketer
Grace’s contemporaries were quick to recognize—and immortalize—his dominance on the field. Yorkshireman Tom Emmett, weary of Grace’s relentless scoring, quipped, “It’s Grace before meat, Grace after meat, Grace all day, and I reckon it’ll be Grace tomorrow.”
Nottinghamshire’s James Shaw echoed the sentiment: “I puts them where I likes, but that beggar, he puts them where he likes.”
Grace himself was not one for intellectual pretensions or veiled humour. His wit, when it surfaced, was simple and direct. When a young batsman boasted he had never been dismissed for a duck, Grace dryly assigned him the No. 11 spot, remarking, “No blob, eh? Then No. 11 for you. Not enough experience.”
This simplicity extended to his cricketing philosophy. Asked how to deal with a difficult ball, his advice was straightforward and timeless: “I should lay the bat against the ball.”
In this unadorned wisdom lies a
metaphor for life itself.
Master of the
Rules—and Their Limits
Grace was as much a master of cricket’s rules as he was of stretching them to their limits. He famously “educated” umpires, often with a wink, ensuring that their interpretations aligned with his own. A typical lesson might involve him admonishing an official: “If he catches me after the ball has gone out of the ground, it’s six to me.”
Francis Thompson aptly described Grace as,“The long-whiskered Doctor that laugheth the rules to scorn.”
Yet, Grace’s bending of the rules was often more playful than pernicious. His brother EM, in contrast, was known for more dubious tactics, such as appealing for obstruction when struck by a batsman’s follow-through. WG, with his disdain for such trickery, reportedly advised, “Obstruction be blown. Catch the ball and never mind bamboozling the umpire.”
Fact, Fiction, and
the Power of Story
Among the many tales of Grace, one stands out for its
theatricality. After being clean bowled by Charles Kortright, the fast bowler
allegedly remarked, *“Surely you’re not going, Doctor. There’s one stump still
standing.”* Whether this exchange occurred or was a creation of Kortright’s
imagination, it remains an enduring part of Grace’s lore.
Grace himself was not immune to barbs. Once, when he
intervened in a street cricket game to rule a boy leg-before, the lad retorted,
*“Garn! What’s an old buffer like you know about cricket?”* Another time, a
servant girl visiting Madame Tussaud’s told him she hadn’t seen his wax figure
because it was in the Chamber of Horrors, which required an extra fee.
The Man Behind the
Myth
Grace’s artfulness on the cricket field was matched by his
shrewdness off it. Often accused of “shamateurism,” he navigated the blurred
lines between amateurism and professionalism with a countryman’s pragmatism.
His infamous attempt to poach Billy Midwinter from the Australian team to play
for Gloucestershire may not have been entirely ethical, but it lacked
malice.
At his core, Grace was a man of simplicity and humour, as
exemplified by his handling of a tramp caught raiding his larder. After
dressing the man’s wounds—“Medical etiquette,” he explained—Grace delivered a
running kick and let him go, an act that was equal parts justice and jest.
The End of an
Era
In his later years, Grace remained a beloved figure, his
presence at public events or even a fleeting glimpse of him in a car enough to
bring life to a standstill. His simplicity and humanity endeared him to all,
even as the world around him grew increasingly complex.
The outbreak of World War I deeply saddened Grace, a man who struggled to reconcile the senselessness of the conflict with his own straightforward worldview. Cricket historian Derek Birley captured the poignancy of his passing in October 1915, writing: “The bleakness of the war was exemplified by the death of Grace, which seemed depressingly emblematic of the end of an era.”
A Legacy Beyond Compare
WG Grace’s life and career defy easy categorization. He was a cricketer, a doctor, a humorist, and a legend whose stories continue to captivate. Whether fact or fiction, the tales of his exploits reveal a man whose influence transcended the sport he so thoroughly dominated. Grace remains not just a figure in cricket’s history but a symbol of its enduring spirit—a blend of skill, wit, and humanity that continues to inspire.
Thank You
Faisal Caesar
The
following day, Shakib carried that momentum into a spell of ruthless precision,
dismantling the West Indies’ middle order with clinical efficiency. His mastery
of length—flighting the ball just enough to entice and deceive—proved too much
for the hosts.
Devon Smith
was lured forward by a teasing delivery, only to be stumped, while Keemo Paul
fell prey to a similar trap. Kieran Powell, fighting to stem the collapse, was
undone by Shakib’s trademark quicker one, trapped plumb in front.
The
skipper’s six-wicket haul was a masterclass in Test match bowling, supported
ably by Abu Jayed, Taijul Islam, and Mehidy Hasan Miraz. Together, they
skittled the West Indies for 129 in their second innings, leaving Bangladesh
with a chaseable target of 335 on a pitch that, while challenging, was far from
unplayable.
Yet, what
followed was a disheartening display of ineptitude and lack of application from
Bangladesh’s batters, culminating in a humiliating defeat within three
days.
A Familiar Story: Batting Failures and Poor
Temperament
Bangladesh’s
response to the target was a stark reminder of their long-standing batting
frailties. While Shakib fought valiantly, crafting a half-century, his efforts
were solitary. The rest of the lineup folded meekly, displaying neither the
intent nor the resilience required in Test cricket.
Tamim
Iqbal’s post-match reflection was telling: “We only have ourselves to blame. Our batting
was not up to the mark. These were difficult wickets but not unplayable.
Exceptional deliveries got us out, but not enough to justify failing to cross
200 in any innings.”
The numbers
were damning. Bangladesh’s collective batting average for the series was a
paltry 12.60—their lowest ever. Not a single batsman managed a century across
four innings. The top order showed glimpses of promise but lacked the
temperament to convert starts into meaningful contributions.
Selection Missteps and Positional Confusion
The team’s
struggles were compounded by puzzling selection decisions. The choice to open
with Liton Das was baffling. A natural middle-order batsman and wicketkeeper,
Liton was thrust into an unfamiliar role, exposing his vulnerabilities against
the new ball.
Imrul
Kayes’s absence due to injury was unfortunate, but Bangladesh’s failure to
field a proper replacement highlighted a lack of depth and planning. Liton,
ideally suited for the lower middle order, was miscast, while Mushfiqur
Rahim—relieved of wicketkeeping duties to focus on his batting—was inexplicably
slotted at six instead of his preferred four or five.
Similarly,
Mahmudullah Riyad, who had previously thrived at number four, was used as a
floater. This positional uncertainty reflected a broader lack of strategy and
cohesion in Bangladesh’s approach.
The
inclusion of Nurul Hasan, despite his lack of readiness for Test cricket, was
another questionable decision. Hyped by sections of the local media, Nurul’s
sloppy wicketkeeping and ineffective batting underscored the dangers of
selecting players based on reputation rather than readiness.
The Senior Players’ Disappointing Show
The
experienced campaigners, Mahmudullah and Mominul Haque delivered dismal
performances. Scoring just 19 and 16 runs respectively across the series, their
technical fragilities were ruthlessly exposed by the West Indies pacers.
Their
failures were particularly damaging given the lack of contributions from the
younger players. In a format that demands patience and adaptability, the senior
players’ inability to lead by example left Bangladesh rudderless.
Lessons to Learn and a Path Forward
There is no
shame in losing a match, but the manner of defeat matters. Bangladesh’s lack of
fight and repeated mistakes were deeply disappointing. Test cricket rewards
persistence, discipline, and adaptability—qualities that were glaringly absent
in the Tigers’ performance.
The team
must revisit its fundamentals. Selection should prioritize readiness and
role-specific expertise rather than hype or reputation. Players like Liton Das
and Nurul Hasan need to be utilized in roles that suit their strengths. Senior
players must step up, not just with the bat but as leaders in attitude and
application.
Bangladesh
could also benefit from reconnecting with past mentors like Chandika
Hathurusingha, whose Sri Lanka team has shown resilience and fights even in
adverse conditions.
As the dust settles on this series, one thing is clear: Bangladesh has the talent to compete at the highest level, but without the right mindset and preparation, that potential will remain unrealized. The Tigers must rise from this debacle, learning not just from their mistakes but from the examples of teams that thrive under pressure. Only then can they hope to carve a place for themselves in the annals of Test cricket.
The morning session in Jamaica began with a glimmer of hope for Bangladesh. Liton Kumar Das, brimming with confidence, signalled his intent early on. A crisply timed stroke through the offside off Shannon Gabriel and a glorious extra-cover drive against Keemo Paul hinted at a positive approach. By lunch, the Tigers seemed to have clawed back into the game, buoyed by their bowlers’ disciplined effort to wrap up the West Indies innings.
However, as
the adage goes, “A good start is only half the battle.” The real challenge lay
ahead.
The Liton Dilemma: Aggression Without
Application
Post-lunch,
Bangladesh’s batting needed discipline—a shift from the Twenty20 instincts to
the grind of Test cricket. Liton, facing Keemo Paul, initially showed glimpses
of restraint, leaving deliveries outside the off-stump. Yet, his eagerness to
play expansive shots betrayed a lack of temperament required for the longest
format.
Gabriel, a
seasoned campaigner, sensed Liton’s impatience. A sharp delivery angled in from
a short-of-a-length caught Liton off guard, trapping him plumb in front. The
dismissal was a textbook example of poor shot selection—a flick attempted when
a solid defensive approach was the need of the hour.
Liton’s
downfall underscored a recurring issue: the inability to adapt aggression to
the demands of Test cricket.
Mominul’s Carbon Copy Dismissal
Mominul
Haque once hailed as Bangladesh’s Test specialist, walked in under pressure.
His dismissal mirrored his first Test woes—a closed face against an angled
delivery from Gabriel. This technical flaw, previously attributed to external
coaching strategies, now seemed more intrinsic.
The absence
of Chandika Hathurusingha once blamed for Mominul’s struggles, raised
uncomfortable questions about the player’s ability to learn and adapt. The
so-called local solutions seemed ineffective, leaving Bangladesh’s middle order
vulnerable yet again.
Shakib and Tamim: A Partnership Without Purpose
With two
wickets down, Bangladesh needed their senior players to steady the ship. Shakib
Al Hasan and Tamim Iqbal stitched together a 59-run partnership, but it lacked
the hallmarks of a proper Test innings. Boundaries flowed, but strike
rotation—a crucial aspect of building pressure and tiring bowlers—was
conspicuously absent.
Jason
Holder, the West Indies skipper, persisted with disciplined lines, knowing
Shakib’s penchant for risky strokes. The gamble paid off. In the 24th over,
Shakib misjudged a delivery he had previously dispatched, slicing it straight
to the fielder. The captain’s dismissal, a loose shot against the run of play,
highlighted a lack of focus and the tendency to repeat mistakes—a cardinal sin
in Test cricket.
The Collapse: A Familiar Tale
Shakib’s
departure triggered a collapse. Mahmudullah Riyad, shuffling across his crease,
fell lbw to a straight delivery—an example of flawed technique against pace.
Tamim, who had shown intent to occupy the crease, succumbed to an angled
delivery from Keemo Paul.
Mushfiqur
Rahim, often the savior in crises, batted with a reckless abandon more suited
to limited-overs cricket. His brief stay at the crease was punctuated by
boundaries but lacked the solidity needed to anchor the innings. A lazy jab at
a short-of-a-length ball ended his resistance, leaving Bangladesh in dire
straits.
Nurul
Hasan, touted as a promising talent, failed to deliver under pressure. A golden
duck added to the misery, while Mehidy Hasan Miraz’s stay lasted just twelve
balls.
A Score Fit for T20, Not Tests
Bangladesh’s
innings folded for under 150—a total more fitting for a Twenty20 match than a
five-day contest. The inability to adjust to the demands of Test cricket was
glaring. Poor shot selection, technical deficiencies, and a lack of mental
resilience combined to script yet another batting debacle.
Lessons to
Learn, Changes to Make
Test
cricket demands patience, application, and adaptability—qualities that seemed
in short supply for Bangladesh in Jamaica. While the bowlers had shown fight in
the morning, their efforts were squandered by a batting lineup unwilling or
unable to grind it out.
The Tigers
must introspect. Senior players like Shakib and Mushfiqur need to lead by
example while promising talents like Liton and Nurul must learn to temper
aggression with discipline. The road ahead is long, but without fundamental
changes in approach, Bangladesh risks repeating the same mistakes.
As the sun set on Day 2, one thing was clear: the Tigers have the talent, but without the temperament, they will continue to struggle in the purest format of the game.
For
Bangladesh, Abu Jayed is one such bowler. Yet, his potential was underutilized
on Day 1, leaving many to wonder why a talent of his calibre wasn’t given the
ball earlier.
But Day 2
in Jamaica told a different story—a tale of redemption and resurgence.
The West
Indies resumed their innings with Shimron Hetmyer and Roston Chase, both eager
to pile on the misery for the visitors. The lacklustre bowling from the
previous day likely emboldened the duo, but what greeted them on Day 2 was a
transformed Bangladesh attack.
Abu Jayed,
the young seamer, took centre stage, defying the oppressive heat and humidity
with a spirited spell of fast-medium bowling. He hit ideal lengths
consistently—back of a length and full deliveries aimed with precision—and
maintained a steady pace around 80 mph. It was this consistency, combined with
his ability to move the ball, that made Jayed a different bowler
altogether.
Jayed
struck early, dismissing the dangerous Hetmyer with a sharp delivery that leapt
off a length outside off stump, forcing an edge. Shortly after, Chase fell
victim to a full delivery angled in, trapped plumb in front. The two set
batsmen, who had looked poised to build a commanding total, were sent back to
the pavilion, leaving the West Indies rattled and sparking a pertinent
question:
Why wasn’t
Jayed used more on Day 1, when the pitch still offered assistance for his style
of bowling?
The answer
lies with Shakib Al Hasan and the Bangladesh think tank. Perhaps they had
banked on spin to unsettle the West Indies, given the traditional vulnerability
of Caribbean batsmen against quality spin. While the strategy was logical on
paper, its execution faltered due to erratic line and length from the bowlers.
On a track with early life, the decision to hold back Jayed—whose full-length
deliveries and ability to bring the ball back in could have been
game-changing—appears questionable in hindsight.
Moreover,
opening the bowling with a spinner on such surfaces may work in shorter formats
like T20s, but in the tactical grind of Test cricket, it often proves
counterproductive.
With
Hetmyer and Chase gone, the complexion of the game shifted. The Tigers were on
the prowl, and Jayed’s early strikes had set the stage for Mehidy Hasan Miraz
to weave his magic.
Miraz, a
proven performer in Test cricket, had been one of the few bright spots on Day
1. On Day 2, he elevated his game, varying his pace and refining his lengths to
perfection. His guile and control brought swift rewards.
Shane
Dowrich, the gritty wicketkeeper-batsman, was lured into a false stroke by a
slower delivery that dipped deceptively, resulting in a tame dismissal. Keemo
Paul followed soon after, edging a full delivery, and Miguel Cummins was
trapped lbw the very next ball. With that, Miraz secured yet another
five-wicket haul in Test cricket, a testament to his craft and
determination.
Even as the
West Indies skipper Jason Holder threatened to forge a tail-end resistance
reminiscent of their series against Sri Lanka, Jayed returned to banish the
spectre of Shannon Gabriel with pace and precision, sealing the innings.
The
turnaround was complete. Bangladesh’s bowlers, led by the youthful exuberance
of Jayed and the seasoned skill of Miraz, had clawed their team back into the
contest. It was a performance marked by grit, adaptability, and, above all, a
refusal to yield.
Now, the
onus shifts to the Bangladesh batsmen. The bowlers have laid the groundwork
with their hard-earned breakthroughs; it is up to the batsmen to ensure that
the efforts of Jayed and Miraz are not squandered.
Test cricket, after all, is a team game, and the Tigers must now come together to build on this momentum. As Day 2 drew to a close, one thing was clear: Abu Jayed had arrived as a force to be reckoned with, and Mehidy Hasan Miraz had reaffirmed his status as Bangladesh’s spinning lynchpin. Together, they reminded the cricketing world that even in adversity, the Tigers have the heart to fight back.
Shakib Al Hasan’s second stint as Bangladesh’s Test captain has started with an uncanny knack for winning tosses. Twice in as many matches, Lady Luck has smiled upon him, granting him the early advantage that any captain craves. Yet, as the dust settles on these matches, the victories at the toss have done little to alter the grim narrative of Bangladesh’s struggles in the longer format.
When Shakib opted to bat first on a green-tinged surface in
Antigua, it seemed a bold and commendable decision. It signalled intent—a
declaration that the Tigers were unafraid to confront the challenge posed by a
lively pitch. But boldness without execution is merely bravado, and the story
that unfolded was anything but heroic.
Bangladesh’s innings unravelled in a single hour, a hapless
procession of batsmen succumbing to the West Indian pacers’ relentless assault.
The scoreboard read a dismal 43 all out—a statistic that will linger as a scar
in the annals of Bangladesh cricket. The visitors needed only to weather the
first two hours of the session, as the track’s initial life was destined to
fade under the Caribbean sun. Instead, the team’s lack of discipline and
temperament—symptoms of an overdose of shorter-format cricket—sealed their fate
before the game had truly begun.
The Antigua debacle seemed to cast a long shadow over the
second Test in Jamaica. Once again, Shakib won the toss, but this time he chose
to bowl first—a decision as puzzling as it was timid. On a surface with a
grassy tinge and underlying hardness, the opportunity to bat first and dictate
terms was spurned. Instead, Bangladesh fielded a bowling attack comprising just
one pacer and three spinners, a combination ill-suited to exploit the morning
conditions. The spectre of Antigua’s ‘43’ appeared to haunt the team,
influencing decisions and undermining confidence.
As the day unfolded, the Jamaican pitch behaved predictably.
The initial grass-induced movement gave way to a harder surface that promised
cracks and turn for spinners as the match progressed. By opting to bowl,
Bangladesh not only missed the chance to seize the initiative but also invited
the prospect of facing a deteriorating pitch in the fourth innings.
The bowlers, including Shakib, struggled to find rhythm or
precision. Erratic lengths—too short to trouble and too leg-sided to
threaten—allowed the West Indian batsmen to settle in. Kraigg Brathwaite, the
epitome of discipline and grit, capitalized on their mediocrity, grinding his
way to a determined century. Bangladesh’s woes were compounded by a missed
review when Brathwaite was on 98—a moment emblematic of the team’s lack of sharpness
in the field.
As the day wore on, Shimron Hetmyer injected flair into the West Indian innings, punishing Bangladesh’s bowlers for their lack of consistency. The Tigers, once known for their fearless bowling under the guidance of Heath Streak and Chandika Hathurusingha, now appeared toothless and tentative. The contrast was stark and painful—a reminder of how far the team has drifted from its days of defiance.
At the heart of this decline lies a troubling pattern: a
captain plagued by self-doubt. Shakib, a cricketer of immense talent and
cricketing acumen seemed uncertain and disconnected. His body language betrayed
frustration, and his decisions lacked conviction. A captain’s mindset often
sets the tone for the team, and when that mindset is clouded, the collective
performance invariably suffers.
Looking ahead to Day 2, the mission is clear yet daunting:
restrict the West Indies to under 400 runs. But achieving this will require
more than just tactical adjustments. It demands a shift in attitude—a rediscovery
of the courage and clarity that once defined this team. Without it, the Tigers
risk enduring another day of regret under the sweltering Jamaican sun.
Bangladesh cricket finds itself at a crossroads. The toss may have been won, but the battle for identity and resilience remains an uphill climb. For Shakib and his men, the time for hesitation has passed. It’s time to channel the fearlessness of old and remind the cricketing world that the Tigers are not to be tamed.
On a lively pitch tailor-made for the pacers, Kemar Roach unleashed a masterclass in fast bowling on the opening morning of the first Test. The seasoned campaigner turned tormentor-in-chief, ripping through the Bangladesh top order with precision and venom. Within the first session, the Tigers’ hopes of a solid start lay in tatters. Tamim Iqbal, Mominul Haque, and Mushfiqur Rahim departed in quick succession, leaving the burden of resurrection on their captain’s shoulders.
But Shakib Al Hasan, the prodigal all-rounder reappointed as Bangladesh’s Test skipper, faltered almost immediately. Facing only his second delivery, Shakib nicked an outswinger from Roach that left him grasping at thin air—his comeback as Test captain igniting with a disheartening duck. By the end of a torrid hour, Bangladesh was skittled for an abysmal 43 runs, a collapse as stunning in its brevity as it was in its inevitability.
Under normal circumstances, such a catastrophic performance would have ignited a firestorm of criticism across Bangladesh. The cricket-obsessed nation holds its heroes close but spares no mercy when they stumble. Shakib, a perennial target for his perceived arrogance and inconsistencies, often bears the brunt of such ire. Yet, with the FIFA World Cup capturing the collective imagination, the full force of public discontent was mercifully diluted. Still, murmurs of disappointment pervaded the cricketing fraternity, questioning the ability of their talismanic leader to navigate the storm.
Shakib Al Hasan is no ordinary cricketer. He is, without a doubt, one of the finest all-rounders of his generation—a player blessed with sharp instincts, a brilliant cricketing mind, and the rare ability to single-handedly turn games in his team’s favour. However, at Antigua, none of these qualities were on display. Instead, Shakib appeared a shadow of himself: a man searching for answers under the unrelenting Caribbean sun.
The Antigua pitch offered variable bounce and assistance for bowlers, conditions Shakib might have exploited in his prime. But his deliveries lacked the bite and menace of yesteryears, his trademark arm balls missing their sting. On this day, the champion cricketer seemed adrift, his body language reflecting his internal struggles. Even champions are entitled to off-days, but captains—especially those burdened with the mantle of greatness—are seldom afforded the luxury of excuses.
In Bangladesh, where cricket is both a passion and a barometer of national pride, captains are expected to embody resilience and fortitude. For Shakib, the challenge is magnified. He carries the expectations of a nation and the weight of his own storied legacy. His critics, quick to brand him as aloof or arrogant, often overlook his undeniable contributions to Bangladesh cricket. Yet, when the team falters, the spotlight inevitably finds its way to him.
Antigua served as a grim reminder of the brutal demands of Test cricket. The format, often regarded as the ultimate test of skill and character, leaves no room for complacency. For Shakib, who has occasionally expressed ambivalence toward the rigours of Test cricket, this was a wake-up call. As captain, he must shoulder not only his personal performance but also the collective spirit of the team. Leadership, after all, is about rising in moments of adversity, about becoming the lighthouse that guides the ship through treacherous waters.
Shakib’s story is far from over. He has the intelligence, charisma, and skill to reclaim his place at the summit. But to do so, he must embrace the demands of Test cricket with renewed vigour. He must inspire his team, not just with words but with deeds, proving once again why he is celebrated as one of the world’s finest all-rounders.
For Bangladesh, success in Tests often mirrors Shakib’s fortunes. When he thrives, the Tigers roar. As the dust settles on a disastrous opening day in Antigua, Shakib Al Hasan must rise, for himself and for his team. The Tigers need their captain to lead them out of the abyss, reminding the cricketing world why Bangladesh’s brightest star still burns with untapped brilliance.