The Ancelotti Era Begins: Brazil’s Gamble on Wisdom, Simplicity, and Reinvention

A Stranger at The Gates of Paradise 

On May 26, 2025, the unthinkable becomes official: Carlo Ancelotti, the urbane Italian tactician and serial Champions League winner, assumes control of the Seleção. With this appointment, Brazil—land of futebol-arte and eternal optimism—embraces a quiet radicalism. For the first time since 1965, a foreigner will lead the national team, and only the fourth time in its gilded history.

Yet this moment feels less like an act of defiance and more like a confession. A confession that, for all its abundant talent and grand narratives, Brazil has lost its way. The mythos of Jogo Bonito has faded into nostalgia; the institutions that once upheld the national team’s stature have grown creaky and compromised. And so, into this frayed tapestry steps a man who builds, not dazzles; who listens before dictating; who has never sold himself as a prophet, only as a master craftsman.

Carlo Ancelotti is not here to save Brazil. He is here to construct it—again.

A Nation of Stars Without Constellation 

The timing of Ancelotti’s arrival is both fortuitous and fraught. The CBF (Confederação Brasileira de Futebol), plagued by internal discord and political instability, remains tethered to the shaky leadership of Ednaldo Rodrigues, who continues to teeter on the edge of removal. Meanwhile, on the pitch, the national team has devolved into a revolving carousel of underwhelming performances, disconnected tactics, and unrealized potential.

Brazil’s calendar has been erratic. Its identity—once defined by attacking verve and swaggering full-backs—has become fragmented. A generation rich in promise has failed to materialize into a coherent force. The last vestiges of unity and discipline under Tite have eroded into inconsistency and confusion.

The decision to hire Ancelotti is not simply a managerial appointment—it is an admission. Brazil lacks a domestic manager of the stature, objectivity, and modern tactical sensibility to restore its footballing relevance. So it turns, with both hope and resignation, to a coach forged in Europe’s elite furnaces.

Ancelotti's Ethos: The Master of Flexible Structure 

It’s tempting to misinterpret Carlo Ancelotti’s demeanour as laissez-faire or to caricature him as "anti-tactics." This would be a mistake.

Ancelotti’s philosophy is not the absence of structure—it is its elegant simplification. He is the antithesis of the modern "system-first" coach typified by Pep Guardiola. Where Guardiola moulds players into an overarching positional play design, Ancelotti adapts his structure to the natural instincts and strengths of his squad. He does not evangelize a single way to play. Instead, he quietly assembles systems around individuals, unlocking their highest potential.

This approach has yielded historic results. Kaka won the Ballon d’Or under Ancelotti. Cristiano Ronaldo posted his best-ever goal contributions per 90 minutes. Benzema’s renaissance as a world-class striker bloomed under his stewardship. Vinícius Júnior’s maturity into a European superstar? That too happened under Ancelotti’s watch.

For Brazil, a country still grappling with its stylistic identity, this adaptability is not just an asset—it is essential.

Why Ancelotti Fits Brazil? 

Unlike club football, where coaches have the luxury of daily training and years to instill a system, international management demands clarity, economy, and empathy. You don’t get to train players year-round. You don’t get to buy reinforcements in January. And you certainly don’t get unlimited time to implement positional play theories.

This is where Ancelotti thrives.

He follows the principle of KISS—Keep It Simple, Stupid. It’s not an insult to intelligence, but a testament to pragmatism. Ancelotti knows you win World Cups not by complexity, but by cohesion. His experience managing superstar egos, navigating high-pressure tournaments, and responding tactically in real-time makes him uniquely suited for the brutal constraints of international football.

Pep Guardiola may be a genius of structure, but Ancelotti is a maestro of environment. For Brazil—a team of flair, ego, and fluidity—this may prove the perfect match.

Tactical Blueprint: 

To understand what Ancelotti might bring to Brazil, one must examine his most recent tactical masterpiece: the 2023–24 Real Madrid squad that captured the Champions League. Lacking a classic No. 9 after Benzema’s departure, Ancelotti deployed a 4-4-2 diamond with immense success.

Goalkeeper: Thibaut Courtois

Defense: Dani Carvajal, Antonio Rüdiger, Éder Militão, Ferland Mendy

Midfield: Eduardo Camavinga at the base, Toni Kroos and Federico Valverde as the 8s, Jude Bellingham in the free role

Attack: Vinícius Júnior and Rodrygo as roaming forwards

There was no fixed striker—just movement, overloads, and rapid transitions. This template may find a home in Brazil, whose current squad lacks a reliable No. 9.

How Will Ancelotti Organize Brazil?

If all players are fit, here’s a likely Ancelotti-inspired XI:

GK: Alisson Becker

Defence: Probability - Vanderson, Marquinhos, Gabriel Magalhães, Carlos Augusto.

Midfield: Probability - Casemiro (CDM), Bruno Guimarães and Andrey Santos (CMs), and Rodrygo Goes as CDM - it is expected, Ancelotti may not prefer an injury-prone Neymar anymore. 

Attack: Vinícius Júnior, Gabriel Martinelli and Raphinha

In Possession:

Full-backs provide width

Casemiro moves higher to crash the box

Bruno and Santos/Gerson drop deeper to orchestrate the build-up

Rodrygo roams, creating overloads and dictating tempo.

Vinícius and Raphinha float wide, attacking spaces

Out of Possession:

The shape flattens to a 4-4-2 or 4-1-4-1

Casemiro shields the backline

Raphinha tracks back, and Rodrygo is given defensive license to roam less

Compact, counter-ready, and intelligent in transitions

FIFA World Cup 2026: From Dark Horse to Destiny?

Brazil doesn’t enter the 2026 World Cup cycle as a favourite—not with the clarity of Spain’s structure, France’s depth, or Argentina’s unity. But therein lies opportunity. Ancelotti inherits a void, not a legacy. He is free to reimagine rather than revive.

In a national team haunted by its own myths, Ancelotti’s realism offers a form of liberation. He will not restore the past. He will reshape the present.

From Ritual to Rebuilding 

In appointing Ancelotti, Brazil has not summoned a messiah. It has hired a method. And perhaps, for a nation that has long floated on nostalgia, this is the most radical act of all.

The challenges are vast. The expectations are immense. But with Ancelotti, Brazil doesn’t just gain a coach. It gains a compass.

If football is indeed a reflection of national character, then maybe Brazil’s greatest triumph in 2026 won’t be a trophy—but the rediscovery of its soul, one pass, one press, one patient moment at a time.

Thank You 

Faisal Caesar

A House Divided: Brazil’s Coaching Crisis and the Quiet Fall of Dorival Júnior

Long before Brazil kicked a ball in the March international window, a quiet revolution had already begun behind the scenes. Conversations had taken place, discreet yet decisive, and the writing was already on the wall for head coach Dorival Júnior. The Brazilian Football Confederation (CBF), under the leadership of Ednaldo Rodrigues, had communicated its enduring desire to bring Carlo Ancelotti into the fold—a courtship that had lingered across continents and calendars. In the same breath, the name Jorge Jesus began to reappear in internal discussions, not as an ideal dream but as a more tangible, present possibility.

These early movements were not simply reactions to performance; they were part of a broader recalibration at the top of Brazilian football. The upcoming presidential election of the CBF, scheduled on the eve of Brazil's showdown against Argentina, created a perfect moment for power consolidation. Rodrigues, a seasoned operator, recognized the opportunity to reassert control. As tensions simmered within the federation, he removed himself from the daily operations of a FIFA international break long marked as a judgment week for Dorival and his staff.

Silence in Brasília: The Sound of Discontent

The Seleção’s base in Brasília during the March fixtures became a crucible of pressure and unspoken uncertainty. The absence of the CBF president during critical preparation phases was interpreted not as neglect, but as a deliberate distancing. In football, absence often speaks louder than words. It was a clear signal that only truly exceptional performances could reverse a decision already in motion.

Internally, Dorival and his coaching staff had set a realistic target: four points from two games. It was a modest ambition meant to ease the tension—particularly if a draw could be earned in the fierce atmosphere of Buenos Aires. But the scars of a disappointing performance against Colombia had not yet healed. Brazil’s fragile momentum made every game feel like a referendum.

Rodrigues finally arrived in Brasília on the day of the 4-1 win over Colombia, and he stayed through the next day's defeat to Argentina. In public, Dorival maintained dignity. He praised the support structures in place and insisted the president had provided the tools necessary to succeed. But in the locker room, the energy had already shifted. It was not the scene of a triumphant revival—it was the quiet recognition of a relationship running its course. No embraces, no rallying words, no promise of tomorrow.

The Art of Surgical Dismissal

Perhaps the most intriguing part of this story is not that Dorival was dismissed—but how. Rodrigues’s strategy wasn’t a sweeping purge but a precise operation. The president separated the coaching staff from the rest of the national team department, an unorthodox move that sent ripples through the corridors of power.

Director Rodrigo Caetano, expected by many to be a central figure in any such decisions, was not consulted. He had no part in the initial overtures to Ancelotti nor in the more recent dialogues surrounding Jorge Jesus. This exclusion speaks volumes about the nature of power within the CBF—centralized, opaque, and firmly held by Rodrigues.

Still, there were hints that the president’s intentions weren’t wholesale dismissal. Just before the meeting that would officially end Dorival’s tenure, team manager Cícero Souza was confirmed to be travelling to Colombia. There, he was to assist Branco in overseeing the U-17 national team’s campaign in the South American Championship, which had opened with a 1-1 draw against Uruguay. Why send someone abroad on federation duty if he was to be relieved the next day? It was a subtle sign of selective pruning rather than a full reset.

In the end, only those tied directly to Dorival were asked to step aside. Assistants Lucas Silvestre and Pedro Sotero, physical trainer Celso Rezende, and team supervisor Sérgio Dimas—all closely linked to the coach’s career—were let go. Curiously, technical coordinator Juan, a recommendation by Dorival, remained. It was a rare thread of continuity in an otherwise disjointed transition.

The Road Ahead: June and the Shadow of Jesus

Dorival’s departure creates not just a vacancy but a vacuum—one the CBF must fill quickly. With the next FIFA window in June looming, Brazil must appoint a new head coach soon to keep its 2026 World Cup campaign on track and reorient a program in disarray.

Jorge Jesus, currently at Saudi club Al Hilal, remains the likeliest candidate. His willingness to forgo participation in the Club World Cup signals both his availability and interest. However, he has expressed a desire to guide Al Hilal through the final stages of the Asian Champions League, a campaign that concludes in early May. Should Brazil want him—and all signs point to that being the case—the timing could align.

What remains clear is that this new chapter in Brazilian football will not be written solely on the field. It is being forged in the boardrooms, in whispered conversations, in emails and unofficial overtures. The pursuit of a sixth World Cup title, Brazil’s holy grail, is now as much about institutional vision and executive manoeuvring as it is about talent and tactics.

Conclusion: The Mirror of a Nation

Brazil’s national team has always been more than a collection of players. It is a mirror of the nation’s aspirations, anxieties, and contradictions. The fall of Dorival Júnior—quiet, calculated, and cold—reflects a federation striving for control and clarity amid a chaotic global football landscape.

As the Seleção looks to rebuild, what emerges is a portrait of transition: not just of coaching philosophies, but of leadership, power dynamics, and identity. Whether the next man in charge is Ancelotti, Jorge Jesus, or another name yet to be whispered in Rio’s corridors, the challenge remains the same: to heal the fractures, inspire a generation, and once again make Brazil the beating heart of world football.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Triumph and Tension: A Tactical Analysis of Brazil's 2019 Copa Amarica Campaign

Brazil’s triumph in the 2019 Copa América, a 9th title for the Selecao, came against the backdrop of considerable uncertainty. With Neymar’s untimely injury and the heightened pressure of being hosts, this victory was far from a foregone conclusion. Yet, despite these challenges, Brazil not only overcame their obstacles but showcased a blend of defensive solidity, tactical fluidity, and mental resilience that secured them the prestigious crown. This analysis seeks to delve deeper into the team’s performance, dissecting their strengths and weaknesses throughout the tournament.

The Defenders’ Dominance: A Record-Shattering Streak

The cornerstone of Brazil’s campaign was their defensive prowess. Tite’s men embarked on a remarkable journey to the final, setting a record as the first Brazil side in history to reach a major tournament final without conceding a single goal. This remarkable feat was not merely a statistical anomaly; it was a testament to a cohesive and disciplined defensive unit. The Brazil backline, marshalled by the experienced Thiago Silva and Marquinhos, displayed rare assurance and composure. Together with goalkeeper Alisson, who had a particularly notable quarterfinal performance against Paraguay, the defence exuded confidence, stifling opposition attacks with near-impervious consistency.

While the team’s defensive strategy was more resolute than previous incarnations, questions lingered over how this cohesion would evolve in the post-Silva, Alves, and Thiago era. The transition away from these stalwarts will pose one of the greatest challenges for Tite moving forward.

A Beautiful Blend of Goals: Artistry in Attack

Though Tite’s Brazil is not synonymous with the "Jogo Bonito" of yesteryear, they still managed to produce a series of stunning goals. The team’s hallmark was a fluid passing style in midfield that allowed for intricate interplay and exquisite long-range strikes. From individual bursts of brilliance to team-oriented sequences, Brazil's goals, especially in the knockout stages, were often works of art.

This tournament revealed Brazil’s ability to combine a pragmatic approach with moments of flair. Despite not being overwhelmingly dominant in terms of goal-scoring chances, they displayed clinical finishing and an ability to strike from a variety of angles, especially in crucial matches like the final against Peru. These goals were emblematic of a team that adapted to the flow of the game while never abandoning its roots in collective cohesion.

Mental Resilience: Strength in Adversity

One of the most notable qualities of Brazil’s performance was their mental fortitude. In past tournaments, Brazil's resolve had often been questioned, especially in the face of adversity. However, this Brazil side showed time and again that they had the collective mentality to see out tight matches. Whether it was Arthur’s sprint to snuff out a last-minute counterattack or Gabriel Jesus pushing through injury to torment Argentina’s defence, the players displayed an indomitable will to win.

This mental strength extended beyond individual efforts. As a collective, Brazil showed great discipline, especially when under pressure or a man down, refusing to retreat into defensive shells. The team's ability to maintain composure while maintaining an attacking intent was most evident in the final, where Everton Cebolinha’s cool finish and subsequent assist secured Brazil’s victory, proving that the team’s heart was just as crucial as its tactical nous.

Tactical Adaptations: Tite’s Mastery and Room for Growth

Tite's tactical evolution from the 2018 World Cup disappointment was evident in Brazil's approach to the Copa América. After he failed to adjust his lineup during the World Cup, Tite demonstrated a renewed pragmatism, making necessary alterations when the situation called for it. A notable tactical shift came after the first two group-stage matches, where Richarlison and David Neres were swapped for Gabriel Jesus and Everton Cebolinha, injecting the team with much-needed pace and width. This adjustment allowed the more senior Dani Alves to thrive in the attacking third while maintaining defensive integrity.

Additionally, Tite showed a deft touch in managing player fitness, particularly with Filipe Luís’ injury. His decision to maintain Alex Sandro as the primary left-back through the knockout stages demonstrated flexibility in selection, something not always evident in previous campaigns. However, while Tite’s tactical adaptability has improved, there remains work to be done in breaking down low-block defences. Brazil’s struggles against the likes of Venezuela and Paraguay highlighted the ongoing need for a creative spark in the final third—an issue that might necessitate the development of a player capable of unlocking such defences with incisive passing.

Flawed Stars: Individual Performances Under Scrutiny

As with any successful campaign, individual performances varied. While Alisson and Dani Alves shone brightly, others faced struggles in their roles. Casemiro, typically a rock in midfield, was occasionally caught out by pressure and struggled with distribution at times. His performance was far from disastrous but inconsistent, and his inability to impose himself in key moments could be a focal point for improvement. Fernandinho, too, displayed glimpses of his quality but was hampered by injury, limiting his influence.

Philippe Coutinho’s failure to truly step up in Neymar’s absence was perhaps one of the most glaring disappointments. Despite flashes of brilliance, his inability to dictate play or take control of the midfield in critical moments left a void that was often filled by the more dynamic but less consistent Arthur. Coutinho’s lack of a killer instinct and inability to cope with aggressive pressing left Brazil’s attack feeling disjointed at times.

On the attacking front, Roberto Firmino’s campaign was polarizing. While he contributed with two goals and several assists, his performances as a centre-forward raised more questions than answers. His lack of a physical presence in the box and inability to hold up the ball effectively in tight spaces hindered Brazil’s attacking fluidity. While Firmino’s technical skill and intelligence were evident in key moments, his struggles as a traditional striker revealed Brazil’s need for more assertiveness in the centre.

Gabriel Jesus, meanwhile, embodied the unpredictable nature of Brazil’s attacking unit. After a shaky start, his late performances in the knockout stages were heroic, capped by his two goals in the final. His energy, skill, and physicality were crucial in Brazil's success, even if his inconsistency at times made him a figure of both frustration and adulation. Jesus’ redemption arc underscored the narrative of a team that, despite moments of doubt, found a way to deliver.

Conclusion: Beyond the Trophy

Brazil’s 2019 Copa América triumph was not just a victory in the traditional sense—it was a statement of resilience, adaptability, and tactical evolution. Tite has built a team that knows how to win in different ways, balancing solid defence with moments of attacking brilliance. Yet, the challenges that lay ahead are considerable. Brazil’s reliance on a golden generation of defenders will soon wane, and the team will need to adapt once again to life without figures like Dani Alves and Thiago Silva. Furthermore, questions over how to break down resolute defences and whether the team can develop a true playmaker capable of unlocking such blocks will need to be addressed.

As the Selecao look towards the future, this victory offers both a sense of accomplishment and a platform for continued growth. The 9th Copa América title may be a crowning achievement, but it could very well be the first of many steps towards evolving the team into a true modern powerhouse.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Brazil vs. Panama: A Glimpse of Samba Amidst Pragmatism

Two years ago, Brazil showcased their dominance against Panama with an emphatic 4-0 victory. That performance highlighted the flair and clinical finishing fans expect from the Selecao. Fast forward to today, and while Brazil secured another win against the same opposition, the result left much to be desired. A team of Brazil’s stature, rich in attacking talent and history, naturally invites expectations of decisive performances, even in warm-up matches. 

Jonas made an electrifying start, finding the net just two minutes into the game, raising hopes of a goal fest. However, the expected flurry of goals never arrived. It wasn’t until the 73rd minute that Gabriel Barbosa, affectionately known as Gabigol, scored his first international goal. His strike, described vividly by *Goal.com*'s live commentary as a "wonderful display of composure," was a moment of brilliance. Picking up the ball, the Santos forward surged into the area, shifted onto his left foot, and deftly placed the ball into the far post—a finish that reminded fans of Brazil's renowned flair. 

Philippe Coutinho’s influence on the game stood out, his deft touches and vision illuminating Brazil’s midfield. The Selecao’s quick, short-passing sequences were refreshing, a nod to their fabled Samba style. Brazil’s midfield seemed more cohesive compared to previous outings, offering a glimmer of hope. Yet, defensively, there were cracks. The backline appeared ragged and prone to lapses that could prove costly against stronger teams. 

Samba vs. Dunga’s Pragmatism 

The issue, however, lies deeper than the scoreline or defensive vulnerabilities. Brazil’s tendency to play fluid, expressive football against weaker opponents like Panama rarely translates to performances against top-tier teams. Under Carlos Dunga’s pragmatic approach, the Selecao often abandon their attacking flair for a more conservative style in high-stakes matches. 

Dunga’s tenure has been marked by prioritizing structure and discipline over the creative expression traditionally associated with Brazilian football. While this approach offers stability, it also stifles the natural instincts of players like Coutinho, Neymar, and Willian, whose brilliance thrives on freedom. 

The match against Panama, though only a warm-up, serves as a reminder that such expressive football might not resurface when it matters most. Dunga’s pragmatism tends to take center stage in competitive fixtures, and it’s this predictability that makes Brazil vulnerable against tactically superior teams. 

The Road to Copa America 

As Brazil prepares for the Copa America, Dunga’s unbeaten streak in five matches since the 2-0 loss to Chile in World Cup qualifiers provides a sliver of optimism. However, two wins and three draws against relatively modest opposition underline the challenges ahead. 

The Copa America won’t be a walk in the park for Dunga and his men. Brazil's current form suggests a team in transition—improving in patches but yet to recapture its fearsome identity. For Brazil to make a deep run in the tournament, they must balance Dunga’s pragmatism with the creativity of their talented roster. 

More importantly, the defense needs urgent attention. The backline cannot afford the same complacency shown against Panama when facing South America’s attacking powerhouses like Argentina, Uruguay, or even Chile. 

Final Thoughts 

Brazil’s victory against Panama is a small step forward but far from a convincing statement. It was a glimpse of the Selecao’s potential, but the question remains: can they replicate such displays against stronger opponents? 

For Dunga, the journey ahead is fraught with challenges. He must not only shore up the defense but also loosen the reins on his attacking players. Without embracing a more fluid, dynamic style of play, Brazil risks remaining a shadow of its illustrious past—a team capable of fleeting brilliance but lacking the consistency to dominate.  

The Copa America will be a litmus test, and for now, the Selecao’s faithful can only hope that Brazil’s Samba returns when the stakes are highest.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Brazil’s Pragmatic Shift Under Dunga: A Crisis of Identity?

Last night, Brazil delivered a performance that can only be described as uninspiring. The team appeared bereft of their trademark flair, a far cry from the footballing artistry that has historically defined the Seleção. Coach Carlos Dunga, however, stood by his team, remarking, “It’s normal after a long time off. You can’t have a perfect game. A lot of things we practised in training came out well, and we can do them even better. I liked how this team performed.”

While Dunga's defence of his players reflects his managerial loyalty, it underscores a deeper philosophical conundrum: is his pragmatic approach stifling Brazil’s footballing essence? 

Brazil’s Style: Freedom as a Core Philosophy 

For decades, Brazilian football has embodied creativity, improvisation, and joy—the samba style that has captured the imagination of fans worldwide. This style thrives on freedom, allowing players to express their individual brilliance within a fluid team structure. When granted this liberty, Brazil has consistently delivered breathtaking football, scripting moments of genius that have become etched in the annals of the sport. 

Under Dunga, however, that freedom appears restrained. His tenure has seen a gradual shift toward a safety-first mentality—a stark departure from Brazil’s natural instincts. While pragmatism has its place in modern football, particularly in high-stakes matches, it can never become the defining characteristic of a team so deeply rooted in expressive play. 

The Roots of Dunga’s Pragmatism 

This tactical conservatism isn’t entirely new. After Brazil’s humbling exit from the 2006 World Cup, Dunga initially adopted a pragmatic style during his first stint as coach (2006–2010). His emphasis on compactness and defensive solidity brought short-term results, but it alienated those who cherished Brazil’s free-flowing style - the outcome was disastrous in South Africa. 

In his current tenure, the shift became more pronounced after last year’s friendly against Austria. The Austrian midfield’s discipline exposed Brazil’s vulnerabilities, prompting Dunga to revert to an ultra-cautious approach. Since then, Brazil has often played as if haunted by their own past failures, scoring a goal and retreating into a defensive shell—a tactic more reminiscent of Italian catenaccio than the effervescent rhythms of Latin American football. 

Pragmatism: A Double-Edged Sword 

Pragmatism has its merits, as evidenced by Italy’s World Cup triumphs in the 1980s and 90s. Yet, it suits teams built around defensive organization and counterattacks, not a footballing culture steeped in artistry and panache. For Brazil, this approach feels like a square peg in a round hole. It clashes with the country’s footballing DNA, robbing the players of the spontaneity and expression that make them special. 

This tactical rigidity proved costly in the Copa América, where Brazil’s performances were tepid at best. Their inability to adapt or take risks was glaring, and Dunga’s safety-first philosophy only amplified the team’s shortcomings. 

Looking Ahead: The Road to Redemption 

As Brazil prepares for the World Cup qualifiers, the question looms large: how long can Dunga persist with this conservative style? While a balance between defensive discipline and attacking freedom is essential in modern football, tilting too far toward caution risks alienating fans and undermining the team’s strengths. 

Dunga’s insistence on pragmatism might stem from a desire for stability, but stability without inspiration is a hollow victory. Brazil’s greatest successes have come not from playing it safe but from embracing their unique footballing identity—unpredictable, vibrant, and utterly enthralling. 

To reclaim their glory, Brazil must rediscover their soul. Dunga has the tools at his disposal: a wealth of talent capable of dazzling the world. The onus is on him to strike the right balance and let the Selecaoo dance to the rhythm of their heritage. Anything less would be a disservice to the legacy of Brazilian football.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar