Monday, May 26, 2014

It's hard to undermine Claudio Gentile's ugly but effective contribution during the World Cup 1982


Claudio Gentile standing behind Maradona during the second round clash between Italy and Argentina, FIFA World Cup 1982. The battle between Maradona and Gentile is one of the most talked and analysed topic. Still now, Gentile’s toughest man-marking is an example for every defenders – how to stop the most dangerous player of the opposition team.

Claudio Gentile was the toughest and ugliest defenders Italy have ever produced. Claudio. Nicknamed ‘Qaddafi’ - since he was born in Libya - Gentile was a hard, uncompromising man. Several famous attackers during his era have fallen prey to his ruthless defending style.

During the 1982 World Cup, Italy struggled to advance into the second round. They were placed in Group – C along with World Champions Argentina and tournament’s most loved and feared team, Brazil. Virtually, Italy were supposed to have no chance at all. If Argentina would make them reel then Brazil would surely bash them in the most ruthless manner, pack them in a coffin and parcel them straight to Italy.

The dismal show during the group stages made the Italian press and fans angry. Especially, the press simply crucified the coach and his men. And Paolo Rossi was accused of having drugs and spending nights at the bar. The Italian coach decided to avoid the press and work silently.

Before Italy’s journey in the second round had kicked off, the Italian coach Enzo Bearzot studied both Brazil and Argentina’s style and tactics. He watched both the team’s match videos and tried to figure out how to stop the Latin American giants. Though the chances were less but let’s not give up so easily.

Bearzot found that, if both Maradona and Zico can be made inactive then there is a chance for Italy to script something special. Argentina’s game revolved around Maradona and even though Brazil were an all-round side where everyone was capable of scoring goals and providing sublime passes, but Bearzot discovered that all those pace and rhythm were provided by Zico.

Enzo Bearzot entrusted Claudio Gentile to check both Maradona and Zico. In the game against Argentina, Gentile was right on Maradona as soon as he received possession. Hardly Maradona could hold the ball on his feet – he was body-checked and cut to the ground, battered and bruised. Argentina suffered from lack of rhythm as Maradona choked. They lost the match and Italy dished out a surprised victory. After the match against Argentina, Gentile uttered four words, the impact of which echoes still now: Football is not for the Ballerinas.


 Zico suffered the same fate as Maradona. Only once Zico was able to outfox Gentile and provide a sublime pass to Socrates who equalized for Brazil, but after that, Zico was checked harshly. He could not handle the ferocity of the Italian defender, and had his shirt ripped in pieces after Gentile was booked for a dangerous challenge on him.

Zico was neutralized; Brazil fought hard but lost the match. It was neither Argentina nor Brazil, but Italy advanced into the semifinals from the group of death.   


There were Rossi’s efforts, there were Dino Zoff’s amazing saves, there was Bruno Conti’s supreme control in the midfield, but it’s hard to undermine Gnetile’s ugly but effective contribution for Italy in 1982.

Thank You
Faisal Caesar 

Wednesday, May 21, 2014

Bangladesh cricket welcomes Chandika Hathurusingha as its new coach


Finally, the debate is over. Finally, the BCB have ended the waiting game. Finally, the Bangladesh cricket team have a new coach.

After a lot of speculation, the BCB have appointed former Sri Lankan batsman Chandika Hathurusinghe as the new coach. He left his job as the assistant coach of New South Wales and coach of Sydney Thunders, after being appointed as the Tigers head coach and will arrive in Dhaka by June 10. This will be Hathurusingha’s first stint as the head coach of an international side and above all, a Test playing nation.

The Bangladeshis know little about Hathurusingha and for which they still are thinking whether the BCB have chosen the right person as coach. Some people have already started to criticize BCB’s decision, but before criticizing someone, first of all, it’s better to have considerable knowledge about that person.

As a cricketer Hathurusingha showed a lot of promise. He was an opening batsman whose style was compact and had a variety of strokes under his repertoire. Until the emergence of Sanath Jayasuriya, he forged a very formidable opening pair with Roshan Mahanama. Moreover, he was a medium pacer who could move the ball through the air and had the habit of picking up crucial wickets. He did well in his first series against New Zealand, but it was overshadowed by some serious lean-patches thereafter. His career didn’t progress the way it was expected.

He played his last Test match and ODI in 1999 and was never picked for the national squad again. Hathurusingha retired from first-class cricket in 2004-05 and focused on developing himself as a cricket coach.

He was first appointed as the coach of United Arab Emirates in December 2005 on a one-year contract and after the end of that contract, he was appointed as the coach of Sri Lanka A on a three-year contract. In 2009, he was appointed as the assistant to Sri Lanka’s national coach, Trevor Bayliss. But he lost his job due to disciplinary reasons as he returned from the Zimbabwe tour early to attend a coaching course in Australia.

Kumar Sangakkara, who was the Sri Lankan captain then requested the Lankan Board to reappoint Hathurusingha. In a letter to the board, Sangakkara praised Hathurusingha’s "no nonsense" approach and his "even and fair" treatment of players. Sangakkara also added that during Hathurusingha's time as Sri Lanka's assistant coach; he had, "out-worked, out-thought and out-shone the foreign coaching staff within the system".

Despite requests from Sangakkara, the Lankan Board didn’t bother to reappoint him and subsequently, Hathurusingha obtained permanent residency in Australia. Hathurusingha worked as a coaching consultant for the Canadian cricket team during the ICC World Cup 2011.

In September 2011, Hathurusingha was appointed as the assistant coach of New South Wales on a two-year contract. Midway through the 2012-13 season, the senior coach Anthony Stuart was dismissed and thus, Hathurusingha was named acting coach for the remainder of the season. In the 2013-14 season, Trevor Bayliss was appointed coach of New South Wales with Hathurusingha remaining as senior assistant and also taking over from Shane Duff as coach of the Sydney Thunder at the Big Bash League.  Hathurusingha might not have been successful as a coach of the Sydney Thunders but he did well for the New South Wales.

It seems that the BCB have appointed someone who is experienced, smart and bears sound knowledge about the technical and tactical aspects of the game. But, as a coach of the Bangladesh cricket team, Hathurusingha’s journey won’t be rosy.

First of all, Hathurusingha’s main task would be to ensure stability within the team, which is suffering from severe low self-esteem. Secondly, he has to be a keen follower of our domestic cricket. Thirdly, he has to be the best friend of the Tigers and Bangladesh fans as well. Without being a very friendly person, it will not be easy for him to work in Bangladesh. And finally, the Bangladesh cricket fans need to be supportive enough. Most often, we think that, such coaches bring an Aladdin’s lamp with them from where a genie will come out and change things dramatically. But it is not that easy. The fans need to be patient.   

But for all these, the BCB must ensure a healthy environment for Hathurusingha to work properly. Over the years, the BCB have been a body where time and again whims, nepotisms and dirty politics have polluted our cricket environment severely. And for which, our cricket has not progressed the way it was expected.

Personal gains and choices are preferred more than cricket’s perfect planning. The higher officials want the coach and captain to be their remote-controlled toys which at times, dents one’s self-respect and thus stagnant the desired progress. 

People like Hathurusingha need freedom while working and might not relish unnecessary interferences. The BCB must be careful about this. They need to revamp their policies and must be very supportive with Hathurusingha as people like him have no wish to become a remote-controlled toy.

Note: This article has been published on Sportskeeda 20/05/2014: http://www.sportskeeda.com/cricket/bangladesh-cricket-welcomes-chandika-haturusingha-as-its-new-coach/  

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Friday, May 16, 2014

Bangladesh cricket - On BCB's coach saga and keeping the trust


Who will be the next coach of Bangladesh cricket team? Or, who should be the next coach? Such questions are buzzing in the Bangladesh cricket arena. The Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) are in search of a coach for the Tigers, but sadly till now they have not been able to find a coach for the Tigers and the search continues.

The vacuum created due to the resignation of Shane Jurgensen is pretty big and it is expected that the BCB will have to work really hard to fill it. Shane Jurgensen might have a very dull and torrid time this year, but mind you, as a coach, his contributions can never be undermined.

The sudden exit of Richard Pybus in 2012 left the Tigers without a full-time coach. Shane Jurgensen, who was the bowling coach during that time, was made the interim coach. As an interim coach, Jurgensen proved his worth as the Tigers beat the West Indies in an ODI series in 2012. With the Sri Lankan series knocking at the door, the Tigers were in need of a full-time coach and being satisfied with Jurgensen’s style of work, the BCB appointed Jurgensen as the full-time coach in 2013.

A new journey started for Jurgensen and it had been a very challenging and satisfactory journey for him and Bangladesh cricket. Jurgensen’s men defied adversities and produced good results throughout the year 2013. The expectations were high in 2014 in the series against Sri Lanka, Asia Cup and World Twenty20, but sadly, the Tigers couldn’t live up to the expectations. The Tigers ended up with eggs on their faces.

As usual, the tradition of blame games started and Jurgensen as a coach was criticized heavily. Suddenly, a cold relationship developed between Jurgensen and BCB and thus, last month, Jurgensen resigned from the post.

Not only as a coach, but also as a person he was very friendly and humble. He had his plans regarding the Tigers for the next year’s ICC World Cup and he had his own ways of managing each player and their shortcomings. His exit is certainly a big blow for Bangladesh cricket.

But, it’s time to move on and it’s time to handle the situation more smartly.

As soon as Jurgensen departed, there was a hue and cry for appointing a local coach – a thought which is pretty different in Bangladesh cricket. As because, we Bangladeshis are comfortable in believing that our local coaches are not well-equipped to coach international cricket teams. A few years back such thoughts might have bear enough weight but at present, such thoughts are pretty myopic.

Over the years, people like Aminul Islam, Sarwar Imran and Khaled Mahmud have become enough qualified to coach the Tigers. Appointing a local coach will be beneficial enough for the Tigers as Ian Pont said, “The problems coaches face in Bangladesh are not insurmountable. But there has to be a will on all sides to resolve them. The board must let coaches actually coach and bring in the changes necessary for the betterment of the game. On the other hand, coaches must understand that the excuse culture is still rife and that working in a cricket mad country where emotions run high, is not the same as coaching in Australia, England or South Africa. That’s why it’s time to give a local coach a try”.

But, the BCB have declined from such plans. Their focus is still on appointing a foreign coach. High profile names like Andy Flower, Michael Bevan and Chandika Haturusingha are being heard; but still nothing is sure. The BCB’s target is perhaps the World Cup and for which they are interested in recruiting someone very experienced who can build this fragile unit in a very short time.

If that is the plan then, I think, either Dav Whatmore or Ian Pont is the best person to galvanize this unit in a short time, as because, these two people have enough experience about Bangladesh cricket and it will be very good if a local coach is allotted alongside them.

But what the BCB is thinking? We are still not sure.

Only one thing I can say and which is, appointing a local coach for the long term will be appropriate enough. We need to put faith in people like Aminul islam, Khaled Mahmud and Sarwar Imran. They will not dissatisfy us.

Note: This article has been published on Sportskeeda on 16/05/2014 http://www.sportskeeda.com/cricket/bangladesh-cricket-bcbs-coach-saga-keeping-trust/

Thank You
Faisal Caesar

Saturday, May 10, 2014

FIFA World Cup: The 'Holy Water' scandal


 

 "There was a pause of play as Pedro Throlligo was put down. The Argentine physio Lorenzo was treating him and the players decided to take water to quench their thirst. Branco asked for a new water bottle from the Argentine physio. Diego Maradona allegedly convinced the Argentinean staff to douse Branco’s water bottle with tranquilizers. Branco drank that water"

Any sports are meant to be played with passion and fairly. Be it in cricket or soccer or basketball; cheating is quite unacceptable. They not only pollute the game but at the same time, send a bad message to the fans, especially the young followers, who watch the game with a huge amount of respect. But sports have always been polluted through cunning activities, which are glorified by some and hated by millions out there.

You can term that cheating as “Hand of God” or anything “Holy (?),” but deep down, I don’t think, your conscience allows you to provide mental peace, while you keep on arguing about a goal scored by hand. Surely, you don’t play football with your hands. Nor, do you reverse the ball by using foreign substances nor do you win a hundred-meter race in the Olympics by taking banned drugs.

In the history of the FIFA World Cup, there have been many controversial incidents. To specific, cheating incidents. Such incidents, over the years, have created enough furor and heated arguments among the fans and critics, and still today, those incidents trigger anger among the fans.

The fourteenth FIFA World Cup was staged in Italy. According to critics, the quality of football played in that World Cup was not up to the mark. The teams adopted a defensive approach and they concentrated more on guarding their own penalty area rather than scoring goals. Most of the knockout matches were decided through penalty shootouts and even though teams like Brazil, Holland, England, and Italy possessed attacking players, surprisingly, they remained unconvincing in front of the goal.

Only West Germany provided the spark with their wing-backs, libero, midfield and forwards, but it also waned as the tournament progressed.

Italia 90 not only witnessed some defensive exhibition of football but at the same time, few of the matches were marred by controversies.

Turin, June 24, 1990: The enthusiasm among football fans all over the world was enormous as two of world football’s most beloved teams Argentina and Brazil met each other in the round of 16.

Argentina were the reigning world champions, but their journey in the Italia 90 started with a shocking defeat against Cameroon at San Siro and a scratchy draw against Romania ensured their qualification for the second round. In the group stage game against the then USSR, Argentina’s most experienced goalkeeper got injured and a new chap named Sergio Goykocechea was given the responsibility to take care of the Argentine goalpost.

The Argentine team lacked the spark of Mexico in 1986. Injuries and lack of form among the players made the Argentine team very fragile, but what they did have someone's cleverness and brilliance of acting which the others didn’t have and he was none other than Diego Armando Maradona, whose cunning ideas proved instrumental in Argentina’s progression in the tournament.

Whereas, the Brazilian side was confident enough to face Maradona's men. Even though this Brazilian side was not up to the mark as the previous World Cups, they still managed to win all their group games and qualified for the knockout stages as the group leaders.

On a warm afternoon at Turin, the Brazilians started brightly – Careca burst into the scene in the opening minutes by cutting through the Argentine defence with a brilliant solo run but shot fractionally wide. Moments later, Careca again failed to get a touch to a corner that flew across the face of goal. Then a Dunga header rebounded back off a post.

With Carlos Dunga and Alemao in total command in the midfield, Argentina's players were finding the going tough. Neither Maradona nor his men could get control over the ball.

The first-half ended goallessly. The second half was, as usual, the display of Brazil’s misses – twice they hit the bar. Still, in the second half, the Argentines were looking helpless as Brazil dominated.

Diego Maradona was under the strict supervision of Brazilian left-back Branco. He was contained effectively and was hardly allowed to let free. Even when Maradona tried to set free, he was body-checked to the ground by Branco and the Brazilian holding midfielders.

Diego Maradona decided to take matters into his own hands to stop Branco.

There was a pause of play as Pedro Throlligo was put down. The Argentine physio Lorenzo was treating him and the players decided to take water to quench their thirst. Branco asked for a new water bottle from the Argentine physio. Diego Maradona allegedly convinced the Argentinean staff to douse Branco’s water bottle with tranquilizers. Branco drank that water.

The game began.

But Branco started to feel sluggish and was unable to contain Maradona. Maradona was set free and with just ten minutes remaining in the match he made a brilliant solo run from the right side – usually, most of his moves occur from the left side – to give Claudio Caniggia a sublime pass which he sent into the Brazilian nets by rounding-up the goalkeeper Taffarel: Argentina 1 Brazil 0!

Brazil’s World Cup dreams were shattered. Tears were shed; plenty of gloomy faces were around as the Samba boys were left stunned by one man’s brilliance and cunning idea. Argentina had won the match, but it was not in the fairest of ways.

Later on, Branco claimed that the bottle of water given to him by the Argentine coaching staff was fishy. Branco threatened to sue the Argentine officials. There had been an angry response to Branco’s allegations from the Argentine officials and press, but after almost 15 years in a television show, Maradona agreed that Branco was given a bottle of water mixed with tranquilizers.

The press was shocked! The world was shocked!

Maradona’s confession triggered anger among the Brazilian fans and players of Italia 90.

Regarding the incident, Argentine coach Carlos Bilardo said, “I don’t know anything about it, but I cannot deny the incident”. According to a journalist, Bilardo checked himself after saying such. Even though, Bilardo and that controversial physio, Lorenzo denied such allegations and criticized the press.

Though Bebeto said, “If Lorenzo denied such allegations, then he lied as he confessed such to me”.

Coach Lazaroni said, “This can’t be a part of sportsmanship, but it’s a dirty game.  It doesn’t matter whether it was fourteen years ago or fourteen days ago, FIFA should punish the offenders. Who can assure that Argentina won’t do the same with other teams”?

The Brazil Football Federation decided to take legal action, but the secretary-general of CBF Ricardo Texeira, later on, stepped back as taking legal action wouldn’t help to change the result.

Diego Maradona’s cheating helped Argentina yet again to reach the finals, but justice can be delayed, but not denied. In the finals, Maradona and his boys tasted his own medicine and since Italia 90, Argentina still could not win a World Cup.

Since then, this saga is known as the “Holy Water’ scandal.

Video Link 1: Holy Water Scandal

Video Link 2: Holy Water Scandal

Video Link 3: Holy Water Scandal 

Note: This article has been published at Cricketsoccer on 09/05/2014 FIFA World Cup: The 'Holy Water' scandal 

Thank You
Faisal Caesar

Friday, May 2, 2014

Once there was a pace bowler named Daulat Zaman

In the then East Pakistan – now Bangladesh – there existed a medium-fast-pace bowler named Daulat Zaman. He was an extremely promising youngster during that time. He had very good control over his bowling, he could move the ball, and more importantly, he could move the old ball late – I repeat again: He could move the old ball late and like Fazal Mahmood, he could cut the ball in and away from the batsmen and was blessed with a fantastic stamina.

I came across an article about him almost 10 or 12 years back. Sadly, I lost that paper-cutting while changing my house. There was less but brief information about his cricketing abilities and this ‘late movement with the old ball’ grabbed my attention the most. How effective that late movement with the old ball was, I am not so sure as he lacked the pace to make it productive enough but as far I have known – though not very much - about him, he was a very effective pacer for the longer-version formats and his selection in the Pakistan Test squad was a matter of time but it didn’t happen.

Frankly speaking, I wish to know more about such blessed cricketers of the past. We don’t have such passionate cricket writers around, except a few people, to pen down an essay in detail about this man. Moreover, we don’t have a proper cricket archive regarding our cricket history.  Mind you, I strongly believe that, Bangladesh has a very rich cricket history as well. But we lack the brains to discover them. Had I not been a doctor I would have personally taken the initiative to explore our cricket history.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar