Showing posts with label Tri-series in Ireland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tri-series in Ireland. Show all posts

Thursday, May 25, 2017

The Flamboyance of Tom Latham and a Turning Point: Mashrafe Mortaza's Captaincy Was Brilliant


Tom Latham epitomizes the art of modern batting. A flamboyant stroke-maker and an exceptional accumulator, his ability to manoeuvre the strike and keep the scoreboard ticking is as lethal as his boundary-hitting prowess. Latham’s innings are a nightmare for fielding sides; even without boundaries, he manipulates gaps and escalates the run rate, leaving captains perpetually second-guessing. Worse still, give him a lifeline, and he will almost certainly turn it into a match-defining knock.

This was evident during the sixth match of the tri-series in Ireland. In the third ball of the innings, Nasir Hossain dropped an absolute sitter off Mashrafe Mortaza’s bowling—a moment that drew ire from fans and critics alike. Such lapses are inexcusable at the international level, and New Zealand gleefully capitalized. Latham, now reprieved, combined with Neil Broom to forge a commanding partnership. While Broom anchored the innings, Latham rotated the strike with surgical precision and peppered the boundary at will.

By the end of the 28th over, New Zealand had raced to 145 for 1, perfectly poised for an onslaught in the death overs—a phase where Bangladesh has historically struggled. At this juncture, the match seemed to be slipping away from the Tigers, but Mashrafe Mortaza had other plans.

Mashrafe’s Attack: A Masterclass in Middle-Overs Strategy

The turning point came in the 29th over. Nasir Hossain, eager to redeem himself, removed Broom with his first delivery, caught smartly by Mashrafe. Sensing an opening, Mashrafe discarded conservative tactics and embraced an all-out attack. Drawing from Imran Khan's philosophy that wickets, not containment, dictate the flow of a match, Mashrafe threw the ball to Mustafizur Rahman.

Mustafizur, or "Fizz" as he is affectionately known, responded with a probing spell. His deliveries oscillated between teasing lines outside off stump and deceptive slants into the pads. Two balls wide of off-stump lured Ross Taylor into false strokes, while others on a middle-and-leg trajectory squared him up. The pressure mounted, forcing Latham into a rash stroke in Nasir's next over. His casual flick missed the mark, and the off-stump lay dislodged—a pivotal moment as the Kiwi innings began to unravel.

Neutralizing the Power-Hitters

With Corey Anderson and Taylor—both fearsome power hitters—at the crease, Mashrafe’s task was far from over. Recognizing the importance of keeping them unsettled, he rotated his bowlers shrewdly. Mustafizur and Nasir continued briefly, but Mashrafe switched to Shakib Al Hasan and Rubel Hossain from the 37th over—a move that paid dividends.

Shakib removed Anderson with a delivery that turned just enough to outfox the left-hander, while Rubel’s pace and aggression at the other end made scoring increasingly difficult. Rubel, one of Bangladesh’s finest pacers, combined hostile short-pitched deliveries with full, attacking lengths. Even when he occasionally leaked runs, the intent was clear: build pressure and induce mistakes. This approach bore fruit, as Taylor, unable to settle, succumbed under the mounting pressure.

Bangladesh’s Death-Overs Resurgence

Historically, Bangladesh has struggled in the death overs, particularly against well-set power-hitters. But on this occasion, Mashrafe’s aggressive mindset ensured a different script. Unlike New Zealand’s strategy of slowing the pace in their previous encounter, Mashrafe instructed his bowlers to persist with attacking lines and maintain pace.

Returning in the 42nd over, Mashrafe removed Jimmy Neesham with a well-directed delivery, and Shakib continued to torment the batsmen with an aggressive line and length, dismissing the dangerous Mitchell Santner. When Colin Munro fell to Mashrafe’s guile, New Zealand’s hopes of a late surge were dashed. The final overs saw the relentless pairing of Rubel and Mustafizur tighten the noose, conceding a mere 22 runs. For a team renowned for their death-over exploits, New Zealand's struggles underscored the brilliance of Bangladesh’s strategy.

Tamim, Sabbir, and the Chase

Set a modest target, Bangladesh’s chase began entertainingly. Tamim Iqbal and Sabbir Rahman combined aggression with elegance, reducing the task to a near cakewalk. Yet, as is often the case, the middle order made heavy weather of what seemed a straightforward chase. Thankfully, Mushfiqur Rahim and Mahmudullah Riyad steadied the ship, ensuring Bangladesh crossed the finish line without further drama.

A Landmark Victory

This victory, Bangladesh's first against New Zealand away from home, was a testament to Mashrafe Mortaza’s attacking captaincy. His willingness to back his bowlers, set aggressive fields, and prioritize wickets over containment turned the tide. In a game where the slightest shift in momentum can be decisive, Mashrafe’s leadership shone through, inspiring a collective effort that neutralized New Zealand’s formidable batting lineup.

While the batsmen played their part, it was Bangladesh’s aggressive bowling and fielding in the middle and death overs that defined the match. This victory is not just a historic moment—it is a blueprint for the Tigers to emulate in future encounters against top-tier opposition.

Thank You
Faisal Caesar  

Thursday, May 18, 2017

Modern-Day Batting in One-Day Cricket - Evolution and Challenges: Bangladesh Need To Act Smartly While Batting In The Last Ten Overs


The art of batting in one-day internationals (ODIs) has undergone a dramatic transformation over the decades. The 1980s and early 1990s were marked by caution at the start of an innings. Batsmen would see off the new ball conservatively, setting the stage for an assault in the final overs. However, from the mid-1990s, the dynamics shifted significantly. With pitches increasingly favouring batsmen and playing conditions designed to benefit the willow-wielders, attacking the new ball bowlers during the powerplay became a common strategy.

In today's era of Twenty20 influence and heavier bats, early aggression is no longer a calculated risk—it is the norm. The modern batter is expected to dismantle the new ball attack, exploiting the field restrictions with an array of audacious strokes. Yet, cricket remains a game of conditions and contexts. There are times when the situation demands restraint, requiring teams to recalibrate their approach. Particularly on seamer-friendly tracks or under scoreboard pressure, teams must adapt, emphasizing composure over recklessness, and saving their firepower for the death overs.

Bangladesh's Inconsistent Batting in the Death Overs

Bangladesh, one of the most improved sides in limited-overs cricket, has embraced modern batting principles, showcasing their ability to attack new ball bowlers. Yet, when it comes to the final ten overs—the death overs—they often falter. This inconsistency has cost them dearly in recent years.

In the first ODI against England in Mirpur, they collapsed spectacularly against Jake Ball after building a solid platform. A similar scenario unfolded in the third ODI at Chittagong, where they lost momentum after the 40th over, ultimately handing the series to England. Conversely, when Bangladesh managed to bat intelligently during the death overs, the results were vastly different. Who can forget their gritty recovery from 169 for 7 in the second ODI against England in 2016 or their ruthless acceleration in the first ODI against Sri Lanka at Dambulla in 2017? These instances underline the importance of strategic batting in the latter stages of an innings.

The Dublin Debacle: A Case Study

In their tri-series match against New Zealand at Dublin, Bangladesh faced a prime opportunity to test their batting mettle. Accepting Tom Latham’s invitation to bat on a seaming pitch, Tamim Iqbal and Soumya Sarkar launched a ferocious attack, taking the New Zealand pacers to task. Their opening partnership of 72 runs in the first 15 overs seemed to put Bangladesh on course for a formidable total.

However, the innings unravelled in the middle overs. Jimmy Neesham, Ish Sodhi, and Mitchell Santner struck vital blows, leaving Bangladesh reeling. A 64-run partnership between Mahmudullah Riyad and Mushfiqur Rahim brought some stability, but with 12 overs remaining, the stage was set for a late assault. Unfortunately, the much-anticipated onslaught never materialized. Bangladesh's lower order faltered, managing only 257 for 9—a total that was inadequate against a side like New Zealand, renowned for their ability to chase targets with clinical efficiency.

What Went Wrong?

The New Zealand bowlers’ strategy in the death overs was simple yet effective: they took pace off the ball, using variations to outsmart the Bangladeshi batsmen. Instead of adapting, Bangladesh's hitters fell into the trap of attempting slog shots, resulting in a series of mistimed dismissals.

What could have been done differently? The answer lies in tactical flexibility. When bowlers employ slower deliveries and variations, the key to maintaining momentum is strike rotation. By taking singles and doubles, the batsmen could have forced Latham to adjust his field settings, creating gaps in the outfield for potential boundaries. Instead of relying solely on brute force, Bangladesh needed to be proactive, building pressure on the opposition and setting a platform for the final flourish.

Beyond Batting: Bowling and Fielding Concerns

Bangladesh’s problems in Dublin were not limited to their batting. Their bowling unit lacked consistency, often bowling in disjointed patches. The fielding, too, was subpar, with a noticeable lack of urgency in stopping singles and cutting off boundaries. Given that this match came after an extended period of rest since the Sri Lanka series, their lethargic body language was puzzling. Such lapses, if not addressed, will undermine their ambitions in high-stakes tournaments like the Champions Trophy.

Lessons for the Future

For Bangladesh to cement their place among the elite in ODI cricket, they must address their deficiencies in the death overs—both with the bat and in the field. Intelligent strike rotation, adaptive shot selection, and sharper fielding will be critical.

More importantly, the Tigers need to harness their aggressive spirit without compromising on tactical awareness. The modern ODI demands a blend of power and precision, audacity and acumen. Bangladesh have shown glimpses of this balance, but to truly compete with the likes of New Zealand, England, and India, they must learn to execute their plans consistently under pressure.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar