Friday, July 17, 2015

The Rise of a 'New Bangladesh': A Cricketing Renaissance


 

Not long ago, Bangladesh's cricket team was often dismissed as an afterthought on the international stage. Mocked mercilessly in social media and labelled "whipping boys" of the cricketing world, their presence in the arena of giants was frequently questioned by pundits and critics alike. Their struggles, particularly in Test and one-day cricket, made them a perennial subject of ridicule, a sentiment painfully endured by the nation’s passionate fans. 

Yet, within mere months, this narrative has been turned on its head. Today, the term, ' New Bangladesh’ reverberates not just within the country but across the cricketing globe. A side once synonymous with defeat has evolved into a symbol of hope, confidence, and resilience, culminating in a stunning series victory against South Africa—a triumph that was as commanding as it was historic. 

 From Underdogs to Fearsome Contenders 

The second and third ODIs of the South Africa series exemplify Bangladesh’s metamorphosis. Historically, matches between the two sides attracted little attention, given the Tigers’ predictable defeats against the formidable Proteas. Even this year, early losses in the T20 series and the first ODI suggested a continuation of that bleak tradition. 

But what unfolded in Chittagong was nothing short of extraordinary. Bangladesh scripted one of the greatest comebacks in their cricketing history, overturning decades of disappointment to clinch the series. This victory wasn’t a fluke—it was a ruthless, calculated performance that left little doubt about the team’s new-found credentials. 

The triumph was particularly sweet for a nation starved of success at the highest level. Until now, Bangladesh had only once recovered from a series deficit to secure victory—against Zimbabwe in 2005. Against cricket’s elite, such a feat had seemed unattainable. But this time, the Tigers roared back with an authority that silenced doubters and ignited the belief that this truly is a 'New Bangladesh'. 

What Defines the 'New Bangladesh'?

The emergence of this 'New Bangladesh' is not an isolated phenomenon but the result of years of groundwork, careful nurturing of talent, and a collective shift in mindset. The transformation lies not just in individual performances but in a team-wide evolution marked by fearlessness, discipline, and ambition. 

 1. The Power of Youth

The infusion of young, exciting talents has been instrumental in reshaping the team. Players like Soumya Sarkar, Litton Das, and Mustafizur Rahman have redefined Bangladesh cricket with their bold and fearless approach. 

- Soumya’s audacious handling of short-pitched deliveries, epitomized by his inventive periscope shot, speaks volumes of his confidence. 

- Litton’s poise under pressure and willingness to take on fast bowlers with daring hook shots reflects a fearlessness once foreign to Bangladesh cricket. 

- Mustafizur’s devastating cutters and unrelenting accuracy have turned him into one of the most formidable bowlers in the limited-overs format. 

These players embody a fresh, fearless brand of cricket, setting the tone for the team. Their energy has been infectious, inspiring seasoned campaigners like Mashrafe Mortaza, Shakib Al Hasan, and Mahmudullah Riyad to elevate their own performances. 

 2. Leadership and Environment

The *new Bangladesh* owes much of its rise to an enabling environment fostered by the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB), head coach Chandika Hathurusingha, and bowling coach Heath Streak. These mentors have not only honed the technical skills of the players but also instilled a belief in their ability to compete with the best. 

Under Mashrafe Mortaza’s astute captaincy, the team has learned to stay composed under pressure. His leadership style—both as a tactician and as a motivator—has been crucial in creating a cohesive unit. Meanwhile, senior players like Shakib and Mushfiqur have seamlessly blended experience with youthful exuberance, ensuring that the team’s progress is built on a solid foundation. 

The Challenges Ahead

While the 'New Bangladesh' has risen to prominence in the limited-overs format, sustaining this success will require consistency, adaptability, and a focus on the longer formats of the game. The team’s meteoric rise has sparked immense expectations, but they must guard against complacency and remain hungry for success.  

The real test will be to replicate this form in foreign conditions, where Bangladesh has historically struggled. Additionally, transitioning this newfound confidence into Test cricket—a format that demands patience and resilience—will be a challenge. 

 A Nation Transformed 

This resurgence is more than just a cricketing story; it reflects the resilience and determination of a nation that refuses to be defined by its past. The 'New Bangladesh; has given its people a reason to believe, proving that with talent, preparation, and the right mindset, even the unlikeliest of contenders can rise to greatness. 

As they continue their journey, the Tigers must remember that this is not the end of the road but the beginning of a new era. An era where they are no longer underdogs, but fearsome contenders capable of taking on the best. An era where they no longer play to survive but to dominate. This is the 'New Bangladesh'—a team that dreams big and delivers even bigger. 

Thank You
Faisal Caesar 

Three Tales of Talent: The Stories of Viv Richards, Inzamam-ul-Haq, and Litton Das



Cricket, like life, thrives on moments of intuition, courage, and vision. Behind every legend lies the discerning eye of a mentor, a scout, or a leader who saw potential beyond numbers. This is the essence of three remarkable stories—Viv Richards, Inzamam-ul-Haq, and Liton Das—where belief in innate talent transcended conventional metrics. 

 The Somerset Scout and the Birth of a King 

In 1974, Len Creed, the vice-chairman of Somerset County Cricket Club, embarked on his annual winter pilgrimage to the West Indies, a scouting mission in search of fresh talent. Creed's entourage was a melting pot of international cricketers, a blend of established names and curious enthusiasts. On this tour, Creed carried a tip from the legendary Colin Cowdrey: "Keep an eye on a young Antiguan batsman named Viv Richards." 

Richards' reputation preceded him, and locals spoke of his prowess in reverent whispers. Yet, when the much-anticipated moment arrived, Viv faltered, managing a modest 32 runs. Most scouts might have dismissed him, but not Creed. What he saw in Richards wasn’t just a player but a spark—a natural flair, composure, and hunger. 

Defying opposition from Somerset's president, who baulked at taking a "gamble" on an unproven player, Creed vouched for Richards with unyielding conviction. His confidence was prophetic. Viv Richards didn’t merely succeed; he rewrote cricket's narrative, embodying dominance and charisma. Creed’s belief in his temperament and innate ability—not just the numbers—cemented Richards’ place in cricketing lore. 

Imran Khan’s Eye for the Unseen

Fast forward to 1991, where Pakistan's captain Imran Khan was building a World Cup team that would go down in history. Imran, a tactician and visionary, had scouts who kept him informed about emerging players. Among their recommendations was a young, rotund batsman with an unassuming demeanour: Inzamam-ul-Haq. 

Imran summoned the boy to the nets, instructing Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis to unleash their fiercest deliveries. What unfolded was extraordinary. Inzamam hooked and pulled fearlessly, and his early reading of length left the pacers frustrated. Standing at the non-striker’s end, Imran observed the young man closely. "This boy is God-gifted," he thought. 

Despite scepticism from selectors and critics, Imran insisted on including Inzamam in the 1992 World Cup squad. The decision paid dividends in the semifinal against New Zealand, where Inzamam’s explosive 60 off 37 balls swung the game and paved the way for Pakistan’s historic triumph. Like Creed, Imran trusted his instinct, recognizing raw talent that mere statistics couldn’t capture. 

Liton Das: A Jewel in Bangladesh’s Crown

Fast forward to modern-day Bangladesh. The discourse around Liton Das is polarizing. While some laud his talent, others question his place in the team, insinuating that factors beyond merit played a role in his selection. This narrative ignores the essence of what makes Litton special: his artistry and temperament. 

Consider two moments against South Africa’s Kagiso Rabada. A short-of-length delivery in the second over was disdainfully hooked for six over long leg—a shot of rare audacity. Then came the fourth over: a good-length ball on middle and off was flicked to backward square leg for four, a stroke of sheer elegance. Few Bangladeshi batsmen possess such an intuitive ability to read length early and execute with precision against top-tier pace. 

Litton’s game isn’t just about technique; it’s about temperament, confidence, and an almost poetic sense of timing. His inclusion in the team mirrors the foresight of Creed and Imran. Coach Chandika Hathurusingha, like a jeweller spotting an uncut gem, recognizes Litton’s potential and nurtures him by positioning him where he can shine. 

The Common Thread: Vision Beyond Statistics

Viv Richards, Inzamam-ul-Haq, and Liton Das—are three players from different eras and contexts, yet their stories converge on a singular theme. The greatness of these players lay not just in what they were but in the vision of those who believed in them. 

Talent in cricket, as in life, cannot always be quantified. Numbers tell part of the story, but they miss the fire in the belly, the courage under pressure, and the artistry that defines greatness. Scouts like Creed, leaders like Imran, and coaches like Hathurusingha see beyond the obvious. 

To those who question Liton Das’ place in the team, it’s worth reflecting: how many players can hook, pull, and flick with such flair under Rabada’s onslaught? How many of us have the vision to recognize and nurture raw talent before it blossoms? 

The game of cricket, much like society, thrives when prejudice and narrow-mindedness give way to open-minded appreciation. Liton Das is not just a player; he is a reminder of how fortunate Bangladesh is to have a talent whose brilliance, if nurtured, can redefine the team’s future.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Monday, July 13, 2015

Bangladesh Cricket: A Resurgence Sparked by Leadership and Resolve


In recent years, Bangladesh has emerged as a formidable force in international cricket, earning respect for its spirited performances against top teams like India and Pakistan. The Tigers' back-to-back series victories against these cricketing giants elevated expectations worldwide, signalling a team capable of challenging any opponent in the limited-overs format. However, the high hopes carried into the South African series were met with a harsh reality check, as Bangladesh stumbled through the initial games. 

The series began with a jarring performance in the first T20I, where the Proteas dismantled the Tigers with clinical precision. The second match showed glimmers of resistance, yet the result remained the same. These early defeats mirrored old habits: rash strokes and a lack of composure under pressure, raising doubts about Bangladesh's readiness to compete consistently against professional units like South Africa or Australia. 

A Timely Intervention

Recognizing the downward spiral, Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) President Nazmul Hassan took the unusual step of engaging directly with the team mid-series. In a move blending stern guidance with heartfelt encouragement, Hassan convened meetings with the players, the captain Mashrafe Mortaza, head coach Chandika Hathurusingha, and the BCB's technical committee. 

Hassan's approach was both critical and constructive. While he openly addressed the team's lacklustre attitude, he also sought to uplift morale by reminding the players of their potential. "You have done so well since the World Cup," he told them. "I do not see why you cannot put up some competition against South Africa, especially on home soil." 

This candid yet supportive tone resonated with the players. Hassan didn’t shy away from technical critiques, advising key players like Mushfiqur Rahim and Soumya Sarkar to refine their shot selection and shoulder greater responsibility. His guidance extended to team strategy, voicing disapproval of overly defensive selections and advocating a more balanced lineup. 

Nasir Hossain later reflected on the impact of this meeting, stating, "Mr President always gives us courage. It was not a formal meeting but more of a heartfelt conversation. He reminded us to stay serious about our game while emphasizing belief in our abilities." 

Turning the Tide

The second ODI marked a dramatic turnaround. Under the lights at Mirpur, a reinvigorated Bangladesh delivered a performance brimming with intent and aggression. The pace attack, led by Rubel Hossain—whose selection bore traces of Hassan’s influence—struck early and decisively. Complemented by crafty spinners, the Tigers skittled South Africa for a modest total. 

In the chase, Bangladesh showcased a newfound composure. Soumya Sarkar, initially tentative, adapted his approach, valuing restraint over flair to craft a brilliant 88. Mahmudullah Riyad’s steady presence at the other end provided the perfect foil, guiding the team to a memorable victory that secured their place in the Champions Trophy. 

The Role of Leadership

Nazmul Hassan’s intervention was more than just a pep talk; it was a masterstroke in crisis management. His ability to address both psychological and technical aspects of the game injected a sense of accountability and purpose into the team. The Tigers' rejuvenated body language and disciplined performance in the second ODI underscored the efficacy of his approach. 

While some critics initially questioned the timing and necessity of such direct involvement from the BCB President, the results silenced detractors. The team's victory against South Africa not only vindicated Hassan’s methods but also showcased the importance of visionary leadership in steering a team through turbulent waters. 

A Bright Future Awaits

This resurgence against the Proteas marks a pivotal chapter in Bangladesh cricket's journey. It demonstrates the team’s ability to learn from setbacks and rise to the occasion when it matters most. With a blend of raw talent, seasoned leadership, and administrative support, the Tigers are poised to script more success stories on the global stage.

The South African series serves as a reminder that cricket is as much about mental fortitude as it is about skill. For Bangladesh, the lesson is clear: belief, preparation, and guidance can turn adversity into triumph, reaffirming their place among cricket’s most exciting teams.

Thank You
Faisal Caesar 

Sunday, July 12, 2015

Ashes Awakened: England's Intelligence, Australia's Illusions, and the Lessons of Cardiff

There are many ways to lose a Test match. Some are cruelly close, some noble in resistance. Australia’s defeat in Cardiff, however, was neither. It was a submission wrapped in disarray, an unravelling that began just before lunch on day four and accelerated with such terminal velocity that England’s 169-run victory in the first Ashes Test felt like inevitability given form. The final rites were performed in the 17th over of the last session, yet the conclusion had been self-authored much earlier, when Australia surrendered five top-order wickets in a disastrous 12-over spell.

Chasing 412 for an improbable win—what would have been the highest successful fourth-innings pursuit in Ashes history—Australia instead collapsed under the weight of poor judgment, misapplied aggression, and a fundamental misunderstanding of their environment. For a team that prides itself on its historical steel, this was a performance that lacked grit, shape, and soul.

England's Silent Revolution

This England side, under a new coach and evolving ethos, is no longer the conservative unit of Flower’s tenure. They are aggressive but measured, expressive yet disciplined—traits that were on full display in Cardiff. Joe Root’s defining first-innings century earned him the Man of the Match award, but it was England’s bowling unit that set the series tone. On a pitch lacking pace or consistent bounce, the seamers adjusted their lengths, and Moeen Ali, though not turning it square like Nathan Lyon, still wove subtle spells to capture five wickets.

England's attack, questioned pre-series for lacking bite, showed precision over flair. James Anderson and Stuart Broad were reenergised, Mark Wood bowled with clever intent, and Ben Stokes’ presence was the glue that held both control and impact. Ali, having gone for 22 in his first two overs, returned to trap David Warner—an inflexion point that sent Australia sliding.

Australia’s Fragile Psyche

Australia began the day with defiance. At 97 for 1, they harboured hope. But Warner's dismissal, leg-before to Moeen, fractured that illusion. In less than a session, the top six fell as if orchestrated to showcase their lack of application. A team chasing 412 does not need reckless abandon; it needs concentration, method, and humility.

None was in evidence. Steve Smith, twice dismissed for 33, was undone by England’s calculated strategy—bowling wide of off, daring him to chase. Michael Clarke, out driving a Broad delivery with little conviction, fell to the same bowler for the tenth time in Tests—a pattern Clarke surely recognises but cannot seem to break. Adam Voges edged Wood from the crease. Brad Haddin heaved at Moeen in a manner more suited to backyard cricket. And Shane Watson’s lbw—his 29th in 109 innings, and 14th against England—felt not just familiar but foretold.

Only Mitchell Johnson, with a clean-striking 77, salvaged dignity from the wreckage. His was an innings born not of resolve, but of release—the game already gone, the weight of consequence lifted. His runs, though forceful, spoke volumes about how much easier batting became once the burden of belief had disappeared.

The Burden of Familiar Words

In the wreckage, Clarke’s pre-match words returned with bitter irony. “Once you get in as a batsman over here, you have to go on and make a big score,” he had said, acknowledging the relentless demands of English conditions. “The hardest part about batting is getting to 20 or 30. When you get to 50, turn it into 100.”

These are wise, weather-worn truths, and Clarke has said similar things in India, in South Africa, in the UAE. Yet for all the recognition, the necessary transformations rarely follow. What is knowledge if it does not shape action? In Cardiff, Australia’s batsmen neither applied discipline nor revealed hunger. They knew the terrain, yet misread the map.

It was a mental failure, not merely a technical one—a conviction that conditions such as these are somehow beneath them, unworthy of their effort. They seemed to view slow, dry pitches not as a Test of skill but as an insult to their identity. Their response was not to adapt, but to rebel—and fail.

England’s Modern Adaptability

By contrast, England played the surface with intelligence and agility. Under Trevor Bayliss, this side appears to balance aggression with awareness. Ben Stokes is a case in point: his two innings were positive without being rash, and with the ball, his ability to vary pace and line delivered the decisive dismissal of Voges.

This version of England is not married to tradition. They’re writing new pages, unburdened by dogma, and playing cricket with instinct sharpened by insight. On a pitch that might have encouraged doughty attrition, they moved the game forward with purposeful energy.

Selection, Method, and Misfire

Australia’s selection betrayed a philosophical misfit with conditions. Mitchell Starc and Johnson chased pace and bounce that weren’t there, offering Root and others room to score freely. Peter Siddle, whose method seemed best suited to the surface, was left out. Lyon, Australia’s most effective bowler, had already shown how the pitch could reward guile over speed. Yet the fast bowlers persisted with short-pitched offerings, as if trying to intimidate a surface rather than understand it.

Such selection—favouring aggression over adaptability—speaks to an enduring belief that only one kind of cricket is “true” cricket. But Ashes series are won not by ideology, but by realism. And realism was all with England in Cardiff.

A Reckoning Beyond the Scoreline

For Australia, the defeat echoes the trauma of Lord’s in 2013, another match where the top order folded with the synchronised discipline of lemmings. The memory of Cardiff 2009, which they sought to exorcise, was merely updated rather than erased.

What must now concern Clarke and Darren Lehmann is not merely the defeat, but the intellectual poverty it revealed. Their players did not adjust, did not reflect, and did not learn. The result is not just a 1-0 series deficit, but a spiritual one. The road to Ashes redemption is now steeper and longer than any physical chase.

The Final Word: Hunger Over Homily

“We all got starts… we need to have more discipline,” Clarke admitted. “The shot selection wasn't as good as it needs to be. At least one, maybe two of those guys—me in particular—we need to go on and make a big score.”

Those are good words. They reflect insight and awareness. But words, for all their elegance, cannot win Tests. Australia have said the right things for years. They now need to do them.

To win the Ashes from behind for the first time since 1997, to claim a series in England for the first time since 2001, they must abandon entitlement and embrace endurance. They must do more than talk about hunger. They must feel it. Act on it. Live it.

Only then will their words begin to mean something again.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar

Saturday, July 11, 2015

Younis Khan: The Reluctant Hero Who Redefined Pakistani Grit


 The early 2000s were a time when Pakistani cricket was ablaze with flair and artistry. The nation, known for its romantic infatuation with elegant batsmanship, was enamoured by the stroke play of players like Yousuf Youhanna (now Mohammad Yousuf) and Imran Nazir. The sight of their fluid drives and audacious shots captured the imagination of fans, who cheered them on as symbols of a cricketing tradition steeped in artistry, adventure, and drama. 

But amid this adulation, Younis Khan entered the scene—a batsman who seemed to defy the very ethos of what the Pakistani fanbase revered. Awkward in technique and unorthodox in style, Younis was not the darling of the crowds. His backlift rose awkwardly from gully, his footwork seemed hesitant, and his defensive technique was far from textbook. To a public yearning for the elegance of Zaheer Abbas, the silken touch of Saeed Anwar, or the improvisational genius of Javed Miandad, Younis felt like an imposter. 

Yet, as the dust of time has settled, Younis Khan stands tall—not merely as a batsman but as an emblem of grit, resilience, and triumph over adversity. His legacy, forged through perseverance and mental strength, offers lessons far beyond cricket. 

The Misunderstood Craftsman 

Younis Khan’s early career was an enigma. Though he showed flashes of brilliance, he never possessed the consistency or flair to capture the imagination of fans. His innings often lacked the aesthetic beauty that Pakistanis craved. For a nation that worships its cricketing poets, Younis was a prose writer—utilitarian and unspectacular. 

This perception, combined with his frequent failures in critical moments, led to widespread ridicule. Critics dismissed him as technically flawed, a journeyman at best. His repeated failures in the national side gave detractors ample ammunition and even ardent followers of the game would tune out when Younis walked to the crease. 

But Younis had something intangible—an indomitable spirit and a mind that refused to capitulate. 

The Turning Tide: A Journey of Redemption 

The narrative around Younis Khan began to shift, not due to a dramatic overhaul of his technique but because of his remarkable ability to deliver when it mattered most. His transformation into one of the finest fourth-innings batsmen in Test history is nothing short of legendary. 

With a record five centuries in the fourth innings of Test matches, Younis has proven his mettle under the most intense pressure. His fourth-innings average of 57.40 ranks among the highest in cricket history, a testament to his ability to perform when the stakes are at their zenith. The monumental run chase against Sri Lanka in 2015, where Younis orchestrated one of Pakistan's most celebrated victories, cemented his place as a giant of the game. 

Resilience Amid Adversity 

Younis Khan’s career is a case study in resilience. Few cricketers have faced as many personal and professional setbacks. He endured the loss of close family members, the tragic death of Bob Woolmer (where he was unfairly implicated in the investigation), and the political machinations of Pakistan cricket, including a ban in 2010. 

Each setback could have derailed a lesser individual. But Younis not only survived; he thrived. His self-belief and unyielding determination turned these trials into stepping stones. Every dismissal, every criticism, every personal tragedy seemed to fuel his resolve to succeed. 

The Younis Khan Blueprint 

What sets Younis apart is his mental fortitude. While his technique remained unorthodox, his mind was a fortress. In the words of Rahul Dravid, “Your state of mind determines how well you combine and use your fitness, technical skills, and game strategies.” Younis embodied this philosophy. His ability to compartmentalize external pressures, focus on the task at hand and adapt to changing circumstances defined his success. 

Younis’ contributions transcend statistics, though they are staggering—over 10,000 Test runs at an average of 52.05, a triple century, numerous match-winning knocks, and the captaincy that led Pakistan to their first-ever ICC World T20 title in 2009. But his greatest legacy is the example he set: that hard work, courage, and an unyielding spirit can overcome even the most daunting challenges. 

The Legacy of a Reluctant Hero 

Younis Khan was never the quintessential Pakistani batsman. He lacked the aesthetic grace of Yousuf, the explosiveness of Afridi, and the charisma of Miandad. But he gave Pakistan something far more enduring—a reminder that greatness is not always born of natural talent but can be achieved through sheer willpower and resilience. 

Today, Younis Khan stands as a towering figure in Pakistan cricket, a symbol of perseverance and hope. His story is one of redemption, a journey from ridicule to reverence. For a nation often consumed by its love for fleeting brilliance, Younis offers a counter-narrative: the quiet strength of a man who refused to give up. 

Indeed, Younis Khan is more than a cricketer; he is an icon of grit, a lesson in resilience, and a beacon of hope for those who dare to dream against all odds.

 
Thank You
Faisal Caesar