Terror and Triumph: Why England Must Tour Bangladesh in 2016

July 1, 2016—a date etched in sorrow for Bangladesh. On the holiest night of Ramadan, the serenity of Dhaka was shattered by an unprecedented act of terror. Five assailants stormed the Holey Artisan Bakery in Gulshan, one of the city's most secure and affluent areas, taking hostages and unleashing violence that left the nation grief-stricken. In the aftermath of "Operation Thunderbolt," the standoff ended, but the scars it left on Bangladesh’s collective psyche lingered. 

Just days later, as Bangladesh gathered for Eid prayers at Sholakia, another bomb blast deepened the wounds of an already mourning nation. These events sent shockwaves throughout the world, with repercussions extending beyond immediate security concerns. For Bangladesh, a country with burgeoning ambitions in sports and tourism, the attacks threatened not only safety but also economic progress and national pride. 

A Nation on Edge 

The ripple effects of terrorism were immediate. Foreign investors hesitated, international tourists reconsidered their plans, and Bangladesh's growing reputation as a cricketing destination came under scrutiny. Only a year earlier, Australia had postponed their tour of Bangladesh, citing security concerns after the fatal shooting of an Italian charity worker in Dhaka. The Tigers, brimming with form and optimism, had looked forward to testing themselves against a historically strong side, but the cancellation left them without Test cricket for nearly a year. 

Now, England’s planned 2016 tour hung in the balance. A security delegation from the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) visited Dhaka, Chittagong, and Fatullah, inspecting venues, accommodations, and protocols. Despite reassurances from the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) and government, uncertainty lingered. Would the shadow of terrorism thwart the hopes of millions of Bangladeshi fans once more? 

Sport in the Face of Adversity 

Terrorism is not unique to Bangladesh. France hosted the UEFA Euro 2016 tournament just months after a series of devastating attacks in Paris. In 2008, England toured India despite the Mumbai terrorist attacks. Why, then, should Bangladesh be treated differently? 

As Mashrafe Mortaza, Bangladesh’s inspirational captain, poignantly remarked: “This kind of attack is happening all over the world. There were attacks in France, and still, the Euro was held there. I think it depends on ECB-BCB, what is going on between them. But I think they should come.”

Mashrafe’s words underscore a truth often overlooked: terrorism seeks to sow fear and disrupt life. Allowing such acts to dictate the course of international cricket would hand victory to those who seek to spread chaos. 

Bangladesh: Rising Above Adversity 

Bangladesh is no stranger to resilience. In recent years, the nation has hosted major international tournaments, including the ICC World T20 and the Asia Cup, with flawless security arrangements. These events showcased the country’s ability to ensure the safety of players and fans alike, dispelling doubts about its readiness to host high-stakes games. 

The government’s response to the Gulshan and Sholakia incidents has been decisive. Security measures have been bolstered across the nation, and life in Bangladesh continues with characteristic determination. Foreign investors remain engaged, and tourists, drawn by the country’s natural beauty and cultural richness, continue to visit. 

Cricket, the heartbeat of Bangladesh, has always been a unifying force. The sport transcends divisions and brings people together in ways few other things can. For a country like Bangladesh, where cricket is woven into the fabric of national identity, the game holds an even deeper significance. 

Why England Must Tour 

The stakes of the England tour extend beyond the boundary ropes. For Bangladesh, hosting England would signal a triumph over fear and an affirmation of its place on the global cricketing stage. For England, the tour represents an opportunity to honor the resilience of a nation and contribute to the unifying power of sport. 

Bangladesh is no longer the underdog that once struggled against cricket’s elite. The Tigers have roared onto the world stage, defeating giants like India, South Africa, and Pakistan in recent years. England would face a fiercely competitive side eager to prove its mettle in a bilateral series. 

The tour would also serve as a reminder of cricket’s unique ability to inspire and unite. Where politics often falters, sport succeeds, fostering connections and breaking barriers. In a world plagued by division, cricket can be a force for peace, demonstrating that life—and the game—goes on, even in the face of adversity. 

 A Defiant Answer to Terrorism 

If England tours Bangladesh, it would be a statement of solidarity and defiance against terrorism. It would signal that the world will not cower but instead stand united against those who seek to disrupt peace. The sight of cricket flourishing in Dhaka and Chittagong would not only uplift Bangladeshi spirits but also reinforce the sport’s role as a symbol of hope and resilience. 

As Mashrafe aptly put it, “The sport should continue.” For Bangladesh, for cricket, and for the world, England’s tour would be more than a series of matches—it would be a victory for the human spirit.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The Slow Decline of Test Cricket: Weather Woes and T20’s Growing Influence

The recent scheduling of a Test series in the West Indies during July and August, the height of the Caribbean’s rainy season, was puzzling at best and irresponsible at worst. For someone like me, who grew up enjoying the Calypso Carnival of cricket between March and April, it felt like an unfortunate disruption of tradition. It wasn’t long before the obvious culprit emerged—scheduling priorities dictated by the Indian Premier League (IPL). The outcome was predictable: Test cricket was marred by rain interruptions, poor facilities, and a general sense of neglect.  

Rain saved the West Indies in one Test, while on another occasion, it washed away four days of play. But it wasn’t just the weather that was to blame—the poorly maintained Queen’s Park Oval in Trinidad played its part in the debacle. The sight of a sunlit outfield remaining unplayable due to inadequate drainage and outdated infrastructure was disgraceful. That such a historic venue, once synonymous with legendary moments, could fail to deliver even a full day’s play due to logistical issues was both ironic and tragic.  

Misplaced Priorities: T20 Over Test Cricket

This raises a troubling question: where does the responsibility lie? The West Indies Cricket Board (WICB) must account for the decay in Test cricket infrastructure. The success of the Caribbean Premier League (CPL) seems to be where their attention—and finances—are directed. With the CPL thriving as a commercial venture, the focus on nurturing and sustaining Test cricket appears to have diminished.  

Unfortunately, this shift reflects a broader malaise in cricket. Test cricket, with its deep-rooted traditions and strategic depth, has been slowly marginalized by the demands of Twenty20 leagues, which emphasize quick entertainment and revenue generation. The WICB’s apparent indifference to the plight of Test cricket in the region signals the erosion of a legacy that once commanded global respect.  

The greatest casualty of this neglect is not just West Indies cricket but the cricketing world at large. The slow decline of one of Test cricket’s most storied nations—whose fast bowlers once terrorized batsmen and whose batsmen were the epitome of flair—is a painful spectacle.  

Hurricane Season and the Folly of Scheduling

A closer look at the Caribbean weather patterns reveals the folly of hosting Test matches during July and August. According to regional weather data, July marks the beginning of the hurricane season, bringing heavy rains and storms to several parts of the Caribbean, including the Bahamas, Barbados, and St. Lucia. The chance of rain increases dramatically in August, making it the least favourable month for outdoor sports. A travel guide humorously described August as “Ugh,” reflecting its poor conditions for tourism—and by extension, cricket.  

Given this, the decision to stage an international Test series during these months was inexplicable. The predictable rain disruptions didn’t just frustrate fans but also undermined the credibility of West Indies cricket. Such poor planning reveals how the cricketing calendar is now dictated more by the IPL and other T20 leagues than by common sense. Had the Test series been scheduled during the traditional March-April window, the outcomes might have been very different.  

A Broader Problem: T20 Leagues and Test Cricket’s Marginalization

The story of Test cricket’s decline in the West Indies is not unique. Around the world, the growing influence of T20 leagues is reshaping the sport’s priorities. The balance between commercial interests and preserving the sport’s rich traditions is tipping precariously in favour of quick returns.  

Even elite cricketing nations like South Africa are not immune to this trend. A recent Test series in Durban revealed how far Test cricket has fallen in some quarters. Rain once again proved to be the villain, but what shocked fans was the state of the drainage facilities at Kingsmead, Durban’s premier cricket venue. Poor infrastructure meant that days of play were lost, even after the rain stopped—an embarrassment for a country with South Africa’s cricketing pedigree.  

For a team that has been among Test cricket’s elite, South Africa’s apparent indifference to maintaining world-class facilities signals a shift in priorities. Has South African cricket, too, decided to follow the West Indies’ path, placing more emphasis on T20 leagues at the expense of Test cricket? The worry is that, like the West Indies, they might soon find themselves reduced to a T20 powerhouse with little to offer in the longer formats.  

A Cry for Change: Restoring Balance

Test cricket, despite its slower pace and longer format, remains the soul of the sport. It demands skill, patience, and resilience—qualities that T20 cricket, with its emphasis on instant gratification, cannot replicate. While T20 leagues generate significant revenue, they should not come at the cost of Test cricket. If cricketing boards continue to prioritize commercial leagues over Test matches, the sport risks losing its identity.  

West Indies cricket offers a cautionary tale. Once the dominant force in world cricket, the team now struggles to compete consistently at the highest level, particularly in Tests. The erosion of cricket infrastructure, coupled with an overreliance on T20 leagues, has led to a slow but steady decline. South Africa risks following a similar trajectory unless urgent measures are taken to restore Test cricket to its rightful place.  

The administrators of world cricket must recognize that the game’s long-term health depends on the survival of all formats. Test cricket cannot thrive on tradition alone—it needs investment, better scheduling, and genuine commitment from boards and players alike. The allure of T20 leagues is undeniable, but cricket’s heritage is far too valuable to be sacrificed at the altar of short-term profits.  

A Call to Action

The rain-ruined series in the West Indies was more than just a scheduling mishap—it was a symptom of a deeper problem plaguing world cricket. The marginalization of Test cricket by T20 leagues is a troubling trend, and the failure of cricket boards to balance tradition with commerce is becoming increasingly apparent.  

If cricket is to preserve its soul, boards like the WICB and Cricket South Africa must rethink their priorities. Test cricket needs nurturing, not neglect. Facilities must improve, scheduling must be thoughtful, and the love for the longer format must be rekindled. Above all, the cricketing world must remember that Test cricket is not just a format—it is the game’s heartbeat. And without it, cricket risks losing what makes it truly great.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A New Dawn for Brazil: The Revival of Jogo Bonito

The Samba Boys kept me awake until dawn. As the clock struck 6:00 a.m., tears streamed down my face—tears of joy, not sorrow. For a Brazilian football fan, it was a moment to treasure, a cleansing rain after years of frustration and despair. It felt as though the dark clouds that had loomed over Brazil’s footballing ethos had parted, allowing the radiance of hope to shine once more. Brazil, a team that transcends mere sport, has reminded the world why they are more than just a football team—they are an embodiment of artistry, freedom, and passion.

From Despair to Redemption

Not long ago, the Seleção found themselves in turmoil. A draw with Iraq during the Olympic group stage left fans disheartened, critics emboldened, and Neymar, the talismanic figure of the team, subjected to ruthless trolling. Questions surrounded the capabilities of coach Rogério Micale, with whispers of his unsuitability gaining momentum. Yet, amidst the growing cacophony of doubt, Micale displayed a rare trait: unwavering belief.

Rooted in the ethos of Brazilian football, Micale understood something fundamental about his team. Brazil’s style, deeply intertwined with its culture, is not one of rigidity or caution. It is a celebration of life, a symphony of creativity and daring, akin to a Canarinho (little bird) in flight. Where others might retreat into pragmatism under pressure, Micale leaned into Brazil’s strength—freedom and joy on the pitch.

In a bold move, he implemented a daring 4-2-4 formation, a system few would dare to employ under the threat of elimination. It was a gamble, yes, but one grounded in the conviction that Brazil’s best chance lay in embracing their identity. And in doing so, Micale’s team rediscovered their rhythm, rekindling the Jogo Bonito spirit that had captivated the footballing world for generations.

The Canarinhos Take Flight

The transformation was immediate and electrifying. No longer bound by fear, the young Brazilian players began to express themselves with the flair and creativity that had once defined their predecessors. Douglas Santos evoked memories of Junior’s elegance, while Zeca mirrored the dynamism of Carlos Alberto. Renato Augusto’s commanding presence in midfield conjured echoes of Didi and Gerson, while Walace provided a dependable Zito-like anchor. Up front, Gabriel Jesus buzzed like Vavá, Gabigol dazzled with Garrincha-esque audacity, and Luan’s adaptability harkened to the intelligence of Tostão.

At the heart of it all was Neymar, who emerged not only as a talisman but as a leader. His performance transcended the traditional confines of a forward. Dropping deep into midfield, Neymar orchestrated play with the vision and finesse of a maestro. Like Pelé and Maradona before him, he blurred the lines between goal-scorer and playmaker, his sublime passing and positional awareness underscoring his brilliance.

The Unjust Criticism of Neymar

Yet, Neymar’s brilliance was not universally celebrated. Critics and fans alike took every opportunity to tear him down, often driven by biases against his club or nationality. The harsh judgment he endured revealed more about the critics than the player himself. Neymar’s commitment to the team was unwavering, and his performances were a testament to his dedication. It is a cruel irony that a player of his caliber often finds himself at the mercy of those who fail to grasp the artistry of his game.

Micale, however, saw what many could not. He gave Neymar the freedom to lead, not through rigid tactics but by encouraging him to embrace the fluidity that defines Brazilian football. This freedom extended to the entire squad, allowing them to transform the tournament into a spectacle of joy and artistry.

A Victory Beyond Gold

Brazil’s triumph in the Olympic Games was more than just a gold medal; it was a symbolic victory for the future of Brazilian football. After the rigid and uninspired reign of Carlos Dunga, which many fans viewed as a betrayal of Brazil’s footballing heritage, Micale’s approach was a breath of fresh air. His team’s performance served as a reminder of what Brazil could be when allowed to play their natural game.

The doubters who question Brazil’s reliance on free-flowing football misunderstand the essence of the nation’s sporting identity. Brazil’s greatness lies in their ability to play with freedom, joy, and creativity—traits that reflect the soul of their people. Pragmatism may deliver short-term results, but it can never capture the hearts of fans or sustain the philosophy that makes Brazilian football a global treasure.

The Legacy of 2016

While an Olympic gold medal may not hold the same prestige as a FIFA World Cup, its significance in 2016 was profound. It marked a turning point, a moment when Brazil reclaimed their identity and reminded the world of their unique contribution to football. For this, the credit belongs to Micale, whose bold decisions and unyielding faith in Jogo Bonito reignited the flames of hope.

The world of football owes a debt of gratitude to Rogério Micale and the young men he led to glory. They didn’t just win a tournament—they revitalized a philosophy. The Canarinhos are soaring once again, and with them, the promise of a brighter, more beautiful game.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Turnaround in the Island Nation: Sri Lanka’s Resurgence Against All Odds

In the summer of 2016, amid the grey clouds of despair hovering over Sri Lankan cricket, a moment of brilliance unfolded on the dusty pitches of the subcontinent. In the first ball of the 45th over of Australia’s innings in the third Test, Rangana Herath, the evergreen warrior of Sri Lankan cricket, delivered a slider that thudded into Nathan Lyon’s pad. The appeal was instant and the umpire’s finger went up. A review later, the decision stood, sealing Australia’s fate at 160 all out. Herath had taken his 13th wicket of the match, etching his name into history as the architect of a remarkable victory. Sri Lanka had not just won the Test but completed a historic 3-0 whitewash of the former world number one side. For a team that had never before managed such dominance over Australia, this triumph was more than a statistical anomaly—it was a statement.

The Shadow of Transition

The victory was as much about perseverance as it was about skill. Only weeks earlier, Sri Lanka had endured a miserable tour of England, succumbing to James Anderson and Stuart Broad’s mastery in swinging conditions. Their performance was dissected with the harsh lens of a cricketing fraternity used to seeing Sri Lanka as a powerhouse, albeit a fading one. The post-Mahela Jayawardene and Kumar Sangakkara era had begun in earnest, and it wasn’t a pretty sight. Angelo Mathews, burdened with the captaincy, struggled to find solace in a team riddled with inconsistency and an absence of generational talent.

But transitions are no strangers to Sri Lanka. They had weathered the exits of Arjuna Ranatunga and Aravinda de Silva in the past, finding salvation in the likes of Muttiah Muralitharan, Chaminda Vaas, Jayawardene, and Sangakkara. These legends, in turn, became the custodians of the team during their own transition. Now, with none of these icons left, Mathews had to navigate a storm with a cast that was largely untested and unproven.

The Herath Factor: A Beacon of Hope

If there was one constant in Sri Lanka’s turbulent seas, it was Rangana Herath. The wily left-arm spinner, with his unassuming demeanour and portly frame, defied conventional wisdom about athleticism. His guile, patience, and mastery over the art of spin transformed him into the torchbearer of Sri Lanka’s legacy. When Australia faltered against him, it wasn’t just Herath’s skill on display—it was the triumph of Sri Lanka’s enduring cricketing ethos.

Herath’s success underscored a critical aspect of Sri Lanka’s resilience: their capacity to adapt. Even as their cricket board grappled with accusations of corruption, the players retained a culture of quiet determination. There were no sweeping changes or dramatic calls for heads to roll. Instead, they placed faith in their process, their players, and their ability to weather the storm.

The Seeds of a New Generation

This faith extended to the new crop of cricketers—Kusal Mendis, Dhananjaya de Silva, Kaushal Silva, and Sandakan—who began to show glimpses of the future. These young guns, supported by Mathews and Chandimal, carried the promise of Sri Lanka’s cricketing revival. The victory over Australia was not merely a moment of glory; it was a harbinger of a brighter era, forged by a team that refused to yield to despair.

Lessons Beyond Cricket

Sri Lanka’s cricketing story in 2016 mirrors the ethos of its people. Despite facing adversity, both on and off the field, they chose to rebuild rather than bemoan their circumstances. This culture of quiet resilience, debate over argument, and positivity over pessimism, became their greatest strength. Their cricket is a reflection of a society that values perseverance and hard work, where solutions take precedence over excuses.

As the cricketing world watches, there is little doubt that Sri Lanka will rise again. Their journey, though fraught with challenges, is guided by the enduring spirit of their cricketing culture. With a balanced blend of experience and youth, Sri Lanka’s resurgence is not a question of *if* but *when*.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Brazil's Ruthless Samba: A Step Closer to Golden Redemption

As the whistle blew to signal the start of the semifinal, I anticipated nothing less than a Brazilian masterclass against Honduras, and the Selecao delivered mercilessly. Neymar, the torchbearer of Brazilian football, ignited the Maracanã with an explosive opening, setting the tone for a dazzling display of Jogo Bonito. What followed was pure artistry—football at its most elegant and expressive, a reaffirmation of Brazil’s indomitable rhythm when in full flow. 

Yet, amidst the euphoria, a lingering concern remains. The Samba Boys danced their way to the final, but the cracks in defence were unsettling. Twice in the second half, Honduras found themselves in positions of promise, moments where Brazil’s backline seemed to stand still, caught napping in the face of determined counterattacks. Against Honduras, such lapses were harmless; against a potential final opponent like Germany, they could be catastrophic. 

The Weight of Redemption

Brazil’s road to this moment has been a winding one. A lacklustre start to the tournament had cast shadows of doubt, but now the Selecao appear to have found their rhythm. Still, my joy is tempered by memories of heartbreak—Seoul 1988 and London 2012, painful reminders of how close Brazil has come to Olympic glory, only to falter at the final hurdle. 

Seoul is etched in my memory with a unique poignancy. I was an eight-year-old boy then, full of hope and wonder, dreaming of Romario and Bebeto bringing home the elusive gold. But instead of triumph, it was heartbreak. The Soviet Union, disciplined and resolute, dashed Brazil’s dreams. The pain of that loss has lingered, a wound that never fully healed. London 2012 reopened it, with Neymar and company falling to Mexico in a defeat that echoed the disappointment of decades past. 

A New Dawn Beckons

Now, Brazil stands on the cusp of history once more. The Maracanã—hallowed ground for Brazilian football—will host what could be the culmination of this long quest for Olympic gold. Rogerio Micale has crafted a team brimming with talent and flair, led by Neymar, whose maturity and leadership have been as evident as his skill. Yet, flair alone will not suffice. The final demands discipline, focus, and unrelenting resolve, particularly in defence. 

The spectre of Germany looms—a team synonymous with precision and ruthlessness. To win against such an opponent would not only erase the memories of past failures but also solidify this team’s place in the annals of Brazilian football. 

Dreams of Celebration

I long for the sight of Rogerio Micale and Neymar lifting the gold medal, their faces alight with joy and vindication. It would be more than a victory; it would be a redemption, a culmination of decades of hope and heartbreak. Until that moment arrives, my heart will remain cautious, tempered by the lessons of the past. 

But should Brazil succeed, the joy will be unparalleled. The gold medal, so long sought after, would finally grace the Selecao. And in that moment, the heartbreak of Seoul and London would melt away, replaced by the unyielding pride of a dream fulfilled. The Samba Boys are one step away—may their final dance be their most glorious. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Hanif Mohammad: The Little Master Who Defied Mortality

The unyielding angel of death has once again claimed one of the finest among us, as it invariably does, leaving a void that echoes across time and memory. Hanif Mohammad, Pakistan’s first great cricketing titan, has departed, his remarkable life brought to its inevitable conclusion. Known for his unbreakable spirit and unparalleled resolve, Hanif's passing reverberates deeply, not just within Pakistan but across the global cricketing fraternity. 

The news of his death came to me during a time of personal trials—amidst my exams—and though duty delayed my reflection, the gravity of his absence was inescapable. Hanif had survived an earlier cardiac arrest, thanks to the skill and dedication of his doctors, a testament to the resilience that had defined his life. Yet, even the greatest fighter must eventually bow to fate’s unyielding call. 

The Architect of Pakistan’s Cricketing Identity

Hanif Mohammad's story is not just that of an extraordinary cricketer but also a reflection of Pakistan’s journey into the world of international cricket. In the early 1950s, Pakistan was a nascent cricketing nation, stepping tentatively into the glare of the international stage. Labeled dismissively as "the babes" of world cricket, they faced seasoned opponents with skepticism shadowing every step. 

Hanif, however, was no ordinary player. With a technique as precise as clockwork and a temperament forged in steel, he took it upon himself to anchor Pakistan's fledgling batting lineup. Where others faltered, he stood firm, becoming the spine of a young team that desperately needed a hero. 

His defensive brilliance was his hallmark—an unyielding wall that could grind even the fiercest bowling attacks into submission. But to reduce him to mere grit would be an injustice. Hanif’s adaptability was unmatched, his defensive shield capable of transforming into a flashing blade when the moment demanded. 

The Legend of Bridgetown and the Masterpiece at Lord’s

While many rightly remember his legendary 337 against the West Indies in Bridgetown—a marathon effort that remains the longest innings in Test history—to me, his innings of 187 at Lord’s in 1967 stands as his magnum opus. Facing a hostile English attack led by the fiery John Snow, Hanif dismantled short-pitched deliveries with a mastery that belied his diminutive stature. His hooks and pulls were strokes of defiance, not just against the bowlers but against the doubts of critics who questioned his place on such a stage. 

That innings was not just a century; it was a declaration. It spoke of a player who could adapt to any challenge, a batsman who could thrive not only on the subcontinent’s dust bowls but also in the intimidating amphitheaters of England. 

A Legacy Beyond Borders

Hanif Mohammad's influence transcended the boundaries of Pakistan. He was a cricketer whose artistry commanded respect even in the most fervent of rivalries. His passing was mourned across India, a testament to his ability to unite cricketing hearts beyond lines drawn on a map. In an era often characterized by divisions, Hanif’s career stood as a reminder of the shared love for the sport that binds nations. 

He was more than just a cricketer; he was a symbol of resilience, of unyielding determination in the face of insurmountable odds. Hanif carried the aspirations of a young nation on his shoulders, giving it not just victories but a sense of identity, a belief that it belonged on the grandest of stages. 

The Eternal Master

With Hanif’s departure, the world of cricket has lost one of its finest craftsmen. Yet, his legacy remains, etched in the annals of the game and in the hearts of those who witnessed his genius. As the “Little Master,” he proved that size and stature are measured not by physical dimensions but by the depth of character and the heights of achievement. 

The unyielding angel of death may have claimed him, but Hanif Mohammad’s spirit endures—a beacon for those who dream, for those who fight, and for those who aspire to leave a mark as indelible as his. Rest in peace, Hanif Sahib. Your innings may have ended, but your legacy will resonate forever. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

 

Pakistan’s special turnaround at The Oval

If the defeat at Manchester was vexatious, then the defeat at Edgbaston was hard to digest as at one point, Pakistan were in a very commanding position. But the Pakistanis, let the match slip out of their hands, and thus, before the start of the fourth Test match at The Oval, the mood in the Pakistan camp was downcast. The Pakistan batting line-up had been irreconcilable at Manchester and Edgbaston, while the sloppy fielding and Yasir Shah’s struggle added extra worries for the Pakistani think-tank. Obviously, Pakistan were not expected to stun England and level the series.

Wahab Riaz’s fiery pace jolted the English batting line-up and when Garry Ballance was dismissed, England were reeling at 110 for 5.

But Moeen Ali and Jonny Bairstow took the game away from Pakistan on day 1. Both of them were the beneficiaries of key reprieves early in their innings, which left Pakistan to rue and another partnership between Moeen and Chris Woakes floored Pakistan and, it seemed, they won’t be able to make a comeback after the Moeen-Bairstow-Woakes show.

At stumps, Pakistan were 3 for 1 and the critics were expecting yet another inauspicious display from the Pakistani batsmen on a track that was offering plenty of assistance for the pace bowlers. But the first hour of the second day changed the complexion of the match and put Pakistan in a commendable position.

Yasir Shah’s brilliant resistance in the first hour of day 2 set the tempo for Pakistan

Against the top teams of the world, the first session of a Test match, especially, the first hour of play, always matters. The Pakistan think-tank sent Yasir Shah as the nightwatchman and the kind of form the Pakistani tailenders had been throughout the series, Yasir was supposed to be an easy wicket. Now, an early loss of a wicket in the first hour of play automatically puts enormous pressure on the batting line-up which is struggling to get out of the lean patch. But the decision to send Yasir as the nightwatchman proved to be a masterstroke.

For one hour, Yasir weather storm of Stuart Broad and James Anderson efficiently and scored a valuable 26 runs, which not only started the day for Pakistan brightly but gave them the momentum which was much needed.

Asad Shafiq’s promotion up the order reaped a rich harvest

At the other end, Azhar Ali kept on going and never let the momentum shift in favor of England and stitched a 75-run stand with Asad Shafiq who was batting at number 4 instead of 6. Shafiq had been another customer who was found wanting in the previous two Test matches and the decision to send him at number four was not a gamble, but a well-thought one as this position suits his style very much and struck a wonderful hundred to strengthen Pakistan’s authority over the Test match.

Never dare to write off veteran Younis Khan

Shafiq’s departure left a huge responsibility on Younis Khan to carry on the momentum and bat England out of the game. In the previous three Test matches, Younis Khan’s dance at the crease and poor shot selection had been criticized, but at The Oval, he was in a different zone. He played the ball late, went behind the ball, and used his feet masterfully to essay yet another comeback innings. Younis Khan scripted a brilliant 218 which bolstered Pakistan’s innings big time and shut the mouth of those critics who had written off Younis a million times.

Mohammad Amir’s resistance with the bat

Throughout the Test match, the Pakistani tail was reluctant to fight and this hurt Pakistan badly at Edgbaston. But at The Oval, the Pakistani tailenders decided to change the mood and dished out a stubborn resistance which surely had made Hanif Mohammad proud in heaven.

After Yasir Shah, Mohammad Amir showed his capabilities with the bat. He defended so well and his calm presence at the crease provided the perfect foil to Younis’ composure who could not have scored his double ton had he not received support from Amir. Both Amir and Younis stitched a partnership of 117 runs for the ninth wicket and the game was almost over for England.

Set an attacking field to encourage the bowlers

Misbah-ul-Haq’s field setting had been the subject of criticism in the previous three Test matches, but he got things right as soon as England’s second innings started. Misbah maneuvered the field very well and hardly was in a defensive mode. In the last session of day 3, he engaged three slips, a leg slip, a catching man at short mid-off and short leg for Amir, and crowed the fielders around the bat while Yasir was bowling.

Such a fieldset, motivated the bowlers to bowl with aggressive intent, and immediately England were four down at the stumps on day 3.

Yasir Shah loves to bowl in London

Misbah’s attacking mindset didn’t change on day 4 and he kept on attacking with his premium bowler Yasir Shah. Yasir changed his game-plan a bit – he varied his pace a lot and the quicker ones hit the deck without turning and hit the batsmen’s pad like a missile. His line of attack varied in between middle-and-off and middle stump and utilized the footmarks intelligently like Shane Warne to sink England.

Unpredictable Pakistan

It’s never easy to bounce back after digesting back-to-back humiliating defeats, but when the team is Pakistan; either you can expect them to script another comical show or an exhibition like the cornered Tigers.

The Pakistan team at The Oval were the cornered Tigers. It was a magnificent win and the perfect tribute to the late Hanif Mohammad.

Misbah-ul-Haq and his men worked very hard to gift his nation such a special turnaround on Independence Day.

Note: This article has been published at Cricketsoccer on 14/08/2016 Pakistan’s special turnaround at The Oval 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

A Clash of Styles: Brazil’s Grit Triumphs Over Colombia’s Bruising Approach

It was a night that tested the very essence of football. Brazil faced Colombia in a quarterfinal that veered far from the aesthetic ideals of the beautiful game. What unfolded was less a match of skill and grace and more a battle of attrition, as the Colombians opted for physicality over finesse. 

The primary target of Colombia’s rugged play was Neymar, Brazil’s talisman, who bore the brunt of ugly challenges from the outset. It was a calculated strategy to unsettle him, and soon, the rest of the Brazilian team tasted the same fate. Frustration simmered, boiling over in the form of an altercation sparked by Neymar after a heavy challenge on Andres Roa. A mass brawl ensued, an unsightly interruption to proceedings that required referee intervention to restore order. Yet, the tension lingered, and Colombia’s rugby-style aggression remained palpable. 

Neymar’s Spark Amid Chaos

Amid the chaos, Neymar provided a moment of brilliance to break the deadlock. A sublime direct free kick sailed past Bonilla, a strike that underscored his class and gave Brazil the lead. However, the Colombians, seemingly determined to resurrect the nightmares of 2014, continued their combative tactics, with Neymar remaining at the centre of their attention. 

Undeterred, the Brazilian captain showcased his playmaking prowess. Picking out Luan with a gorgeous long pass, Neymar set the stage for a spectacular goal. Luan’s audacious long-range strike left Bonilla with no chance, doubling Brazil’s lead and injecting a rare moment of beauty into an otherwise bruising encounter. 

The Defensive Wall: Marquinhos and Rodrigo Caio

Brazil’s central defensive pairing of Marquinhos and Rodrigo Caio rose to the occasion, delivering a masterclass in resilience. The second half saw Colombia attempting to exploit Brazil’s advanced pressing with swift counterattacks, but Marquinhos and Caio were imperious, executing crucial tackles to quell the danger. Behind them, goalkeeper Weverton played a vital role, making several terrific saves. However, his penchant for punching the ball rather than catching it—a habit reminiscent of Sweden’s former goalkeeper Thomas Ravelli—could invite trouble in tighter matches. 

A Battle of Grit and Resolve

While Brazil’s free-flowing style was evident in flashes, the physicality of the contest stifled much of their rhythm. This was not the spectacle of *Jogo Bonito* seen against Denmark. Yet, despite the disruptions, Rogerio Micale’s Selecao maintained their composure, advancing to the semifinals with grit and determination. 

Micale’s Brazil: A Team That Means Business

This Brazilian side under Micale is proving to be more than just a celebration of artistry. It is a team capable of adapting to adverse conditions, defying odds, and grinding out results when required. Though Colombia’s bruising approach may have disrupted the charm of the game, it could not derail Brazil’s momentum. 

As the Selecao march into the semifinals, they carry with them not only the flair of their storied past but also a newfound steeliness. This combination of artistry and resolve could be the key to reclaiming Brazil’s place at the pinnacle of world football. The Samba Boys mean business, and their journey is far from over.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

The Samba Symphony: A Night of Rekindled Glory for Brazilian Football

Salvador bore witness to a spectacular revival of Jogo Bonito as Rogerio Micale’s Brazil swept aside all doubts with a scintillating display of football. The shadows of criticism that loomed large over the past week were banished by a commanding 4-0 performance—a symphony of skill, flair, and tactical brilliance that reignited the essence of Brazil’s footballing identity. 

Micale, ever the tactician, drew inspiration from Brazil’s glorious past, adopting the vintage 4-2-4 formation. This system, which revolutionized attacking football in 1958, provided the framework for an irresistible performance. The echoes of Pelé, Garrincha, and the golden era reverberated as the young Brazilians painted a masterpiece on the Salvador canvas. 

The Tactics: A Nod to the Past, A Vision for the Future

From the outset, Brazil’s intent was clear: attack with verve, dominate possession and overwhelm the opposition with movement and creativity. The formation fostered a fluid interplay between the players, with triangles and squares forming in midfield reminiscent of the 1970s and 80s glory days. Short, incisive passes orchestrated attacks that dazzled both the opposition and spectators alike. 

Neymar, the heartbeat of this team, played a role akin to Pelé in 1970. Dropping deep, he dictated the tempo, distributed with precision, and orchestrated attacks with a composer’s finesse. His chipped pass over the Danish defence to Douglas Santos, leading to Luan’s goal, was a moment of artistry that encapsulated the very essence of Jogo Bonito. 

Douglas Santos emerged as a revelation. Combining the defensive solidity of Nilton Santos with the attacking flair of Roberto Carlos, he seamlessly transitioned from wingback to left winger, adding width and unpredictability to Brazil’s attack. His positional intelligence and vision made him an invaluable asset on the left flank. 

Individual Brilliance: The Gems of Salvador

Gabigol and Gabriel Jesus: Among the two Gabriels, Gabigol shone brightest, exuding the confidence and poise of a player destined for greatness. His creativity and precision in the final third were a constant menace. Meanwhile, Gabriel Jesus’s much-needed goal was a testament to perseverance—a crucial confidence booster for the young star. 

Luan: The quintessential number 7, Luan’s positional awareness was exemplary. His ability to anticipate movements and position himself to capitalize on opportunities showcased a footballing IQ that belied his years. 

Walace: A modern-day midfield enforcer, Walace brought balance to the team. While destroyers in midfield were once anathema to Brazil’s footballing philosophy, Walace demonstrated how such players can complement attacking flair. He not only broke up opposition attacks but also initiated transitions with precise passing. 

Marquinhos: At the heart of Brazil’s defence, Marquinhos was a fortress. His composure under pressure and command of the backline provided a solid foundation for Brazil’s attacking exploits. 

A Celebration of Identity

Micale’s Brazil didn’t just win a football match; they reminded the world of what Brazilian football represents. It’s a celebration of life, an art form where every pass, dribble, and goal tells a story of joy and creativity. This was football at its purest—a harmonious blend of tradition and innovation that honoured Brazil’s storied past while laying the groundwork for a bright future. 

The Road Ahead

While this performance was a testament to Brazil’s potential, consistency will be key. The challenges ahead will demand the same tactical discipline, technical brilliance, and collective spirit. But for now, the Samba Boys can revel in their triumph, knowing they have rekindled the flame of Jogo Bonito. 

Salvador witnessed more than just a match—it saw the rebirth of a philosophy, the resurgence of a dream. And for those who have followed Brazilian football through its highs and lows, this night was a reminder of why we fell in love with the Samba Symphony in the first place. 

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Spin’s Eternal Spell: Australia’s Struggles on Turning Tracks

Last year, Cricket Australia (CA) unveiled an ambitious project at the National Cricket Centre in Brisbane: a hybrid spin pitch designed to mimic subcontinental conditions. Located at Ray Lindwall Oval near Allan Border Field, this initiative aimed to address Australia's recurring nightmares against spin bowling on turning tracks. Coupled with the recruitment of spin maestro Muttiah Muralitharan, it was expected to bolster the Aussies’ technique and temperament against quality spin.

Yet, one year on, the project seems to have yielded little fruit. When the number-one Test side set foot in Sri Lanka, expectations ran high. They were the clear favourites against a young Sri Lankan team still smarting from a disastrous tour of England. But cricket’s enduring charm lies in its unpredictability, and after eight days of compelling cricket, it was Sri Lanka who emerged victorious with back-to-back wins.

This triumph was not born of rank-turners—the pitches at Pallekele and Galle were not the venomous minefields one might anticipate in Sri Lanka. Instead, they demanded application, discipline, and a refined technique. For Australia, those qualities were in short supply. Their batting against spin resembled an amateurish effort, riddled with technical flaws and mental lapses that belied their top billing.

The Art of Tackling Spin: A Lost Cause for Australia?

To succeed against spin, a batsman must play with the straightest of bats and an uncluttered mind. Whether driving with a high elbow or playing with soft hands, the golden rule is clear: play with the spin. Using the full face of the bat and keeping the ball on the ground are non-negotiable fundamentals. Yet, Australia's batsmen seemed to abandon these basics in favour of reckless strokes more suited to the Big Bash League than the cauldron of Test cricket.

The art of reading the spinner’s hand, the trajectory of the ball, and its movement off the pitch was all but absent. While fleeting moments of composure—marked by forward presses and watchful play—offered glimpses of capability, these were exceptions rather than the rule. Instead, Australia’s batsmen often lunged at deliveries or hung back indecisively, leaving them vulnerable to Sri Lanka’s trio of spinners—Rangana Herath, Lakshan Sandakan, and Dilruwan Perera.

Footwork: The Missing Link

The hallmark of effective batting against spin lies in purposeful footwork. Yet, Australia's batsmen appeared leaden-footed, their legs seemingly paralyzed by the sight of a turning ball. A still head, nimble feet, and the ability to rotate the strike are critical on pitches like Pallekele and Galle. But modern batsmanship, enamoured by the allure of power hitting, often overlooks these essentials. The Australians’ inability to adapt showcased not only a technical deficiency but also a deeper temperamental failure.

Strike Rotation: A Dying Art

On turning tracks, rotating the strike is as valuable as hitting boundaries. It disrupts a spinner’s rhythm, forces fielding adjustments, and alleviates pressure. Yet, Australia's batsmen, seemingly conditioned by the glamour of improvisation and big hits, neglected this critical aspect of the game. Their unwillingness to grind, spend time at the crease, and build partnerships highlighted a glaring lack of patience and game awareness.

A Tale of Two Sides

In stark contrast, Sri Lanka’s young side displayed grit and guile. Kusal Mendis, in particular, was a revelation, showcasing the resilience and technical acumen Australia so sorely lacked. Where the Australians faltered, Sri Lanka thrived—playing late, using soft hands, and adapting their strokes to the conditions.

The Path Forward

Australia’s woes on spin-friendly tracks are not new, but their repetition is troubling. The hybrid spin pitch at Brisbane and the expertise of Muralitharan may have been well-intentioned measures, but they cannot substitute for on-field application and mental fortitude. The Australians’ inability to learn from their mistakes in Pallekele and adjust for Galle is a stark reminder of the importance of adaptability in Test cricket.

If Australia hopes to avoid a 3-0 whitewash, they must return to basics. The path to redemption lies in embracing patience, improving footwork, and honing the mental resilience required to withstand the trials of subcontinental pitches. Without these adjustments, Australia’s struggles against spin will remain an enduring Achilles' heel, a painful reminder of their vulnerability on the global stage.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Edgbaston: A Lesson in Test Cricket's Ruthless Dynamics for Misbah and Pakistan

The beauty of Test cricket lies in its unpredictability. When two top-tier teams clash in pursuit of supremacy, the battle often becomes a captivating spectacle, a treasure trove for cricket purists. In an era dominated by the blitzkrieg of Twenty20 cricket, the engrossing contests of July and August reminded us why Test cricket endures, silencing those who prematurely declare it a dying art. 

The fourth Test between England and Pakistan at Edgbaston was a masterclass in the topsy-turvy nature of this format. For four-and-a-half days, Pakistan appeared in control, only for England to execute a dramatic turnaround, seizing an improbable victory. While credit is due to England’s resilience, Pakistan’s undoing was largely self-inflicted, stemming from tactical missteps, poor execution, and a lack of adaptability under pressure. 

Misbah's Misstep: Winning the Toss, Losing the Initiative

The great W.G. Grace once famously advised: "When you win the toss—bat. If in doubt, think about it, then bat. If you have very big doubts, consult a colleague—then bat." Misbah-ul-Haq, however, disregarded this sage wisdom. Choosing to field first on a true Edgbaston pitch—a surface ideal for batting—proved a pivotal error. 

While Misbah may have been influenced by past records (since 2005, teams batting first at Edgbaston had failed to win), such decisions must be grounded in the strengths and weaknesses of one’s team, not historical trends. Pakistan’s batting lineup, fragile and inconsistent, thrives better when defending totals rather than chasing them. By opting to field first, Misbah exposed his team to the unenviable task of batting last on a wearing pitch, ultimately resulting in their dramatic collapse. 

The Fragility of the Tail: Sarfaraz Left Alone

Starting day three at 257 for 3, Pakistan were well-placed to bat England out of the game. However, a sudden batting collapse, exacerbated by the tail’s inability to support Sarfaraz Ahmed, squandered this advantage. 

Sarfaraz, the lone warrior, displayed grit and composure, but the tailenders crumbled, adding just 143 runs for the last seven wickets. Historically, Pakistan's lower order has shown the ability to stretch leads in critical moments. At Edgbaston, however, they wilted under pressure, leaving Pakistan’s first-innings total insufficient to challenge an England side adept at bouncing back. 

The Absence of a Fifth Bowler: A Fatal Flaw

Pakistan’s four-man bowling attack, so effective at Lord’s, proved inadequate at Edgbaston. While Sohail Khan’s first-innings heroics offered a glimmer of hope, his fatigue in the second innings became glaringly evident. Similarly, Rahat Ali’s erratic line and length placed undue strain on Mohammad Amir and Yasir Shah, who bore the brunt of the workload. 

In contrast, England’s balanced attack highlighted the importance of a fifth bowling option. When Steven Finn and Moeen Ali struggled, Chris Woakes and James Anderson stepped up, ensuring relentless pressure. A competent all-rounder in Pakistan’s ranks could have provided much-needed support, but the lack of such a player—and the unwillingness to adapt strategies—left them vulnerable. 

Pragmatism Over Attack: Misbah’s Defensive Captaincy

In Test cricket, especially against a team like England, containment rarely yields success. Yet, on the fourth day, Misbah’s approach shifted from aggression to pragmatism. As Mohammad Amir and Yasir Shah applied pressure, Misbah chose to contain Moeen Ali and Jonny Bairstow rather than push for wickets. 

This defensive mindset allowed England to regain their composure and build momentum. Instead of setting attacking fields to exploit England’s vulnerabilities, Misbah’s defensive placements enabled Moeen and Bairstow to score freely. In the longest format, defensive tactics can backfire spectacularly, as they did here, allowing the opposition to dictate terms. 

Reverse Swing: Pakistan’s Kryptonite

Chasing 343 on the final day was always going to be a formidable task. Yet, after the early loss of Mohammad Hafeez, Azhar Ali and Sami Aslam offered a glimmer of hope with a resolute partnership. However, the old ball—and England’s mastery of reverse swing—proved decisive. 

Alastair Cook’s field placements provided a clear indication of England’s strategy, emphasizing middle and leg-stump lines. Despite this, Pakistan’s batsmen failed to adapt. Poor technique, over-ambitious strokes, and excessive shuffling across the crease played into England’s hands. Against reverse swing, maintaining a lower backlift, tracking the ball’s shine, and exercising caution are essential. Yet, Pakistan’s batsmen, seemingly unprepared, succumbed to the pressure. 

Lessons to Learn Ahead of The Oval

This defeat at Edgbaston serves as a stark reminder that success in Test cricket demands more than talent—it requires astute decision-making, tactical flexibility, and mental resilience. Misbah-ul-Haq, celebrated for his calm demeanour, must shed his pragmatic instincts in favour of a more proactive approach. 

Pakistan’s think-tank must address key issues: selecting a fifth bowler, shoring up the tail’s batting, and refining techniques to counter reverse swing. Above all, the team needs to develop a mindset that embraces aggression and seizes opportunities, rather than waiting for the opposition to falter. 

As they prepare for the final Test at The Oval, Pakistan have the chance to rectify their mistakes and showcase the fighting spirit that has long been synonymous with their cricket. For a team as mercurial as Pakistan, redemption is never out of reach—it merely requires the courage to evolve.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar 

Brazil’s Olympic Struggles: Tactical Missteps, Overblown Comparisons, and the Search for Identity

Brazil's failure to score in two consecutive matches during the Olympic men's soccer tournament is nothing short of a stunning disappointment. After the initial stalemate, the excuse of "first-match jitters" might have held water. However, when the same offensive ineptitude persists into the second game—particularly against a team like Iraq, whose defensive naivety was on full display—such rationalizations lose their validity. This moment demands introspection, tactical reevaluation, and unflinching criticism. 

Tactical Missteps: The 4-2-4 Conundrum 

While ambitious, coach Rogério Micale's commitment to the 4-2-4 formation appears increasingly misplaced under the current circumstances. The system, reliant on relentless attacking interplay, has failed to ignite the spark expected from Brazil's traditionally vibrant offensive machinery. While the concept of shifting to a more pragmatic 4-4-2 formation may lack the glamour of the original setup, it offers compactness—a necessary foundation for recalibration. From there, flexibility exists to transition fluidly into a 4-2-4 or 4-3-3, allowing adaptability against varying oppositions. 

Overblown Comparisons: Gabriel Jesus Is Not R9 

The comparisons drawn between Gabriel Jesus and the legendary Ronaldo Nazário (R9) are as premature as they are misguided. Ronaldo was a generational phenomenon—a striker who did not merely score but also elevated those around him. Watching his performances in the Copa América 1997, the 1998 World Cup quarterfinal against Denmark, or his iconic campaigns in the Copa América 1999 and the 2002 World Cup reveals the essence of his greatness. Ronaldo thrived as both a solitary frontman and a creative fulcrum, effortlessly crafting opportunities for his teammates, Rivaldo and Ronaldinho included. 

In contrast, Gabriel Jesus operates best as a winger, where his dynamism and agility come to the fore. If he is to be utilized as a central striker, he requires a complementary partner or, at the very least, wingbacks capable of delivering precision crosses to exploit his strengths. A pairing with Neymar, with the latter positioned in a creative role just behind Jesus, could offer a viable solution. 

Questionable Selections 

Renato Augusto's inclusion raises significant questions about Brazil’s selection policy. His inability to form cohesive partnerships with Thiago Maia or Felipe Anderson renders him a liability rather than an asset. If his presence in the squad is predicated on regional favoritism due to his Rio de Janeiro roots, such decisions are not only counterproductive but also antithetical to Brazil’s storied footballing ethos. Similarly, Douglas Santos' role in the squad remains puzzling. Players like William and Zeca, who possess the attacking acumen and defensive discipline required of modern wingbacks, are glaring omissions. 

Neymar: Shadow of His Best Self 

Neymar, Brazil’s talisman, cuts a figure of frustration. His apparent lack of match fitness is alarming, especially for a player of his calibre. The sight of his free kicks crashing into the wall, rather than soaring over it with their trademark finesse, is emblematic of his current struggles. Whether this decline stems from an indulgent off-season or other factors, it underscores the need for him to rediscover his form and sharpness. 

The Need for Urgency 

While Brazil has exhibited periods of domination, the team’s play lacks the fluidity, creativity, and incisiveness that have long been the hallmarks of their footballing identity. Micale, a coach of considerable promise, must adapt swiftly to ensure this Olympic campaign does not descend into mediocrity. Time is of the essence, and the road to redemption begins with acknowledging the gaps and taking decisive steps to address them. 

Brazil’s footballing tradition is not merely about winning but about winning with style—a flair that dazzles and captivates. This generation must aspire to uphold that legacy, for anything less would be an affront to the memories of those who came before them.

Thank You

Faisal Caesar