Sunday, May 29, 2016
A Tale of Redemption: Real Madrid's rebirth under Zinedine Zidane
Wednesday, May 25, 2016
Heath Streak: The Architect of Bangladesh’s Pace Revolution
A Transformational Partnership
Under the
stewardship of Hathurusingha and Streak, alongside the leadership of Mashrafe
Mortaza, Bangladesh cricket underwent a remarkable metamorphosis. The days of
meek capitulations gave way to a fearless and assertive brand of cricket that
won admirers worldwide. Victories against giants like England, India, Pakistan,
and South Africa were no longer seen as flukes but as the outcomes of a methodical
and determined approach.
Hathurusingha
focused on refining the players’ technical and mental resilience, while Streak
spearheaded a revolution in the bowling department. For a team historically
reliant on spin, fast bowling had always seemed a peripheral art. Pacers were
used sparingly, often as placeholders until the spinners could be brought into
the attack. Consequently, aspiring cricketers in Bangladesh rarely idolized
fast bowlers.
The Streak Effect
Heath
Streak changed all that. He tirelessly worked with Rubel Hossain, Taskin Ahmed,
Al-Amin Hossain, and Mashrafe Mortaza, moulding them from mere supporting
players into match-winners. His guidance didn’t just improve their technical
skills—it transformed their mindset. For Streak, fast bowling wasn’t about
filling overs; it was about taking wickets, dictating terms, and intimidating
the opposition.
Perhaps the
crowning jewel of his tenure was the emergence of Mustafizur Rahman, whose
meteoric rise owed much to Streak’s tutelage. Mustafiz’s mastery of cutters and
variations became a nightmare for batsmen around the globe and symbolized the
new face of Bangladesh’s pace attack.
A New Identity for Bangladesh Cricket
The impact
of Streak’s efforts went far beyond individual players. Bangladesh’s bowling
strategy underwent a paradigm shift. They began fielding pace-heavy lineups,
even on home soil, where spin had traditionally ruled. The Tigers no longer
hesitated to sacrifice a spinner for an extra pacer, reflecting a newfound confidence
in their fast bowlers.
This
transformation had a ripple effect on the nation’s cricketing culture.
Youngsters who once dreamed of becoming left-arm spinners like Shakib Al Hasan
now aspire to emulate Taskin Ahmed, Rubel Hossain, or Mustafizur Rahman.
Streak’s legacy was not merely in the wickets taken but in the dreams he
ignited among a new generation of Bangladeshi cricketers.
The Looming Departure
Streak’s
contract with Bangladesh, spanning 450 days over two years, was set to expire
in June 2016. As the end of his tenure approached, rumours of him seeking new
opportunities began to circulate. His interest in working with the BCCI’s
National Cricket Academy in Bengaluru highlighted his ambition to broaden his
horizons. For Bangladesh, however, his potential departure was a cause for
concern.
Streak’s
intimate understanding of the team dynamics and his rapport with the players
made him invaluable. Replacing him would be no easy task. The BCB faced a
crucial decision: should they let go of the man who had laid the foundation for
Bangladesh’s fast-bowling renaissance, or should they make every effort to
retain him?
Why the BCB Must Act
Heath Streak
is not merely a coach; he is a visionary who has reshaped the very identity of
Bangladeshi cricket. Letting him go now would be akin to discarding the goose
that lays golden eggs. While other candidates may possess the credentials to
take on the role, none would have the same understanding of the team’s psyche
or the nuanced challenges of Bangladeshi cricket.
Moreover,
continuity is critical for sustained success. The Hathurusingha-Streak
combination has worked wonders, and disrupting that synergy could have
unintended consequences.
A Lesson in Retention
The
examples of other cricketing nations serve as a cautionary tale. Teams that
failed to retain key personnel often struggled to maintain their upward
trajectory. Conversely, those that prioritized continuity—Australia under John
Buchanan or India under Ravi Shastri and Bharat Arun—reaped rich rewards.
For
Bangladesh, Heath Streak is not just a coach but an architect of their
progress. Retaining him would signal the BCB’s commitment to long-term success.
It would also reaffirm their belief in the value of investing in expertise
rather than seeking short-term fixes.
The Path
Forward
As Streak
considers his options, the BCB must act decisively. Extending his contract,
perhaps with enhanced responsibilities or incentives, would be a step in the
right direction. Simultaneously, they should create a roadmap for further
developing Bangladesh’s fast-bowling talent, ensuring that Streak’s work
continues to bear fruit even after his eventual departure.
Heath
Streak’s legacy in Bangladesh cricket is already secure. However, whether that
legacy is the beginning of a golden era or a fleeting chapter depends largely
on the decisions made in the coming months. For the sake of Bangladesh cricket,
one can only hope that the BCB recognizes the value of the man who has helped
transform a dream into reality.
Thank You
Friday, May 20, 2016
The Fairytale Triumph: An Analytical Reflection on Leicester City’s Premier League Fairytale
In July of the previous year, Claudio Ranieri was on a quiet Italian holiday, unaware that a single phone call would reshape the geography of English football. Steve Kutner, his long-time agent, had been knocking on doors across England with a stubbornness that bordered on faith. Most stayed shut. Leicester City, bruised from the Nigel Pearson saga yet wary of drifting backwards, held the last crack of light. Kutner sensed their hesitation, but in football, as in life, hesitation is simply a challenge disguised as doubt.
Ranieri was unemployed, but not diminished. England still
tugged at him—the unfinished business of his Chelsea years, a small London flat
unchanged since the days when he coached in the shadow of billionaire ambition.
Several Championship clubs had politely declined him. But Pearson’s abrupt
dismissal created a sliver of possibility, and Kutner pried it wider.
He submitted a dossier that read like a résumé of
near-greatness: trophies at Fiorentina and Valencia, second places strewn
across Europe like markers of a man forever close, yet eternally uncelebrated.
This was the Ranieri enigma—always respected, rarely exalted. Kutner was
convinced that all Leicester needed was to meet the man.
They did. And Ranieri, as always, was unmistakably,
disarmingly himself—charming, warm, deeply knowledgeable, and above all,
sincere. In Aiyawatt Srivaddhanaprabha, Leicester’s vice-chairman, he found a
listener who understood the subtleties of football, not merely the numbers
surrounding it. Stories of Totti, Batistuta, and old Italian dressing rooms
filled the air. Something clicked.
The second meeting included Vichai Srivaddhanaprabha,
Leicester’s owner. That was when the conversation deepened from possibility
into belief. Yet even then, belief had limits. No one—neither owners,
directors, nor Ranieri himself—could have imagined that the genial Italian
would one day stroll around the King Power Stadium with a Premier League medal
on his chest. Leicester were 5,000-1 outsiders. Appointing Ranieri felt less
like a plan and more like a gamble tinged with romance.
When Ranieri arrived and decorated his office with the
monochrome portraits of every other Premier League manager—his own whimsical
gesture of hospitality—many wondered how long he would last before someone else
boxed up those photographs.
On the day he was introduced to the media, Gary Lineker’s
now-famous tweet—“Claudio Ranieri? Really?”—echoed the scepticism of a nation.
Leicester’s board sat beside him in what looked suspiciously like a public vote
of confidence issued before a ball had even been kicked.
Yet football has always reserved its greatest poetry for
those brave enough to ignore its logic
The Birth of a Phenomenon
Nine months later, as Ranieri sat in the stands watching
videos of Leicester fans—market vendors, station staff, families,
children—thanking him for changing their lives, the man who had once been
mocked as the “Tinkerman” became something else entirely: the custodian of a
miracle.
How did it happen? Even inside the club, explanations wobble
between logic and mythology. But the truth is layered, and it begins before
Ranieri.
Pearson’s “Great Escape” the previous spring had revealed a
team hardened by adversity. Seven wins in nine. A late surge from relegation’s
edge to 14th place. A quiet message written in the margins of the Premier
League table: this team has something.
Walsh amplified it with recruitment that bordered on
prophetic. Christian Fuchs on a free. Shinji Okazaki from Mainz. And then the
uncut jewel: N’Golo Kanté, a name that barely registered even among seasoned
scouts. Mills, Walsh, and Leicester’s analysts built a case for Kanté through
data, film, and sheer conviction. Ranieri hesitated—Kanté looked small, almost
fragile. Walsh insisted: “Kanté, Kanté, Kanté.”
History would later record that £5.6 million bought
Leicester not just a midfielder but a heartbeat.
Ranieri, finding familiar allies like Steve Walsh and
inheriting Craig Shakespeare’s trust within the squad, did something managers
rarely do: he adapted to the dressing room he found. No sweeping changes, no
ego-driven overhauls. He allowed Pearson’s internal culture to breathe while
making one crucial tactical incision—scrapping the back three.
It was a decision that defined the season.
Ranieri’s Leicester: The Simplicity that Mastered
Complexity
Leicester’s 4-4-2 was not an echo of English football’s
past; it was its reinvention. Two narrow banks of four. A tireless second
striker. A centre-forward who lived on the shoulder of defenders. A defensive
structure compact enough to turn the midfield into a tunnel and transitions
into weaponry.
In a league obsessed with possession, Leicester ceded it.
Only West Brom completed fewer passes. Yet no team knew better what to do with
the ball when they finally won it.
Kanté recovered. Drinkwater distributed. Mahrez drifted,
disguised, and detonated. Vardy ran—not just fast, but first.
Everything Leicester did had purpose. Nothing was wasted.
The result?
23 wins, 81 points, and the most efficient counter-attacking
system the league had ever seen.
This was not luck. This was clarity.
The Characters of the Miracle
Jamie Vardy: The Relentless Romantic of Chaos
He refused the gym, lived on adrenaline and Red Bull, and
sprinted like every run might be his last. He scored 24 goals, broke Van
Nistelrooy’s record, and roared the team into belief. Vardy was the blunt
instrument sharpened into a scalpel.
Riyad Mahrez: The Alchemist
Purchased for €450,000, Mahrez played football as if
sculpting space itself—cutting inside, bending passes, unfurling dribbles that
defied geometry.
17 goals. 11 assists. A PFA award. A season of balletic
brutality.
N’Golo Kanté: The Footballing Polymath
He did not simply tackle; he pre-empted.
He did not simply intercept; he absorbed.
The joke stated that Kanté covered 70% of the earth. The
deeper truth was that Kanté covered every weakness Leicester might have had. He
turned transition into inevitability.
Kasper Schmeichel: The Quiet Foundation
Behind the romance stood a man of steel. His saves from
point-blank range, his sweeping, his distribution—the invisible architecture on
which Leicester’s counter-attacks were built.
The Season’s Inflection Points
Manchester City 1–3 Leicester City
A masterclass of belief. Mahrez’s goal, a piece of pure
invention, made the impossible feel attainable.
Arsenal 2–1 Leicester City
The 95th-minute heartbreak. The loss that should have broken
them but forged them instead. Ranieri granted the players a week off. They
returned with fire in their veins—six wins in seven.
The Final Run
The same XI, almost unchanged, marched through the run-in
like seasoned champions. Experience over youth. Hunger over heritage.
The Hidden Engine: Leicester’s Science of Survival
A cryo chamber at –135°C. GPS chips mapping every sprint.
Heart-rate monitors, nightly wellness surveys, and a staff that communicated
with disarming honesty. Leicester’s injury record wasn’t luck; it was
infrastructure.
Ranieri was open to compromise—tactical meetings held while
injured players pedalled on stationary bikes. No mystique. Just pragmatism.
Football, stripped of its modern pretensions, is still a
human game.
The Blueprint of Belief
By the end, Leicester had overturned football’s hierarchy
with the most unfashionable virtues in the modern age:
Clarity over complexity
Cohesion over cost
Hunger over hype
Belief over branding
Where others built empires with money, Leicester built a
miracle with conviction.
“hey only had one job: avoid relegation. Instead, they made
history.”
The Leicester City of 2015–16 will forever remain a reminder
that in a world drowning in data and strategy, sometimes the purest football
emerges from simplicity, courage, and a team that dares to ignore its destiny.
And at the centre of it all stood Claudio Ranieri—smiling,
grateful, softly spoken—the manager who came not to tinker, but to transform.
Saturday, May 14, 2016
The Tale of Mustafizur Rahman: Between Glory and the Allure of Modern Cricket
On a memorable evening in Mirpur, a vociferous crowd witnessed history as a young boy from Satkhira, Mustafizur Rahman, etched his name into cricketing folklore. It was June 18, 2015, the same date that had once seen Bangladesh stun Australia at Cardiff a decade earlier. This time, however, the victims were a full-strength Indian side, humbled by the magic of Mustafizur on his ODI debut. The young left-armer’s unplayable cutters and deceptive variations flummoxed the Indian batting order, earning him a remarkable five-wicket haul—a feat only his compatriot Taskin Ahmed had achieved before him on debut.
Throughout that series and beyond, Mustafizur continued to dazzle. His
spellbinding performances against South Africa, particularly in the Chittagong
Test, confirmed that he was not merely a one-series wonder but a generational
talent. On that fateful day in Chittagong, the world’s top-ranked Test team
collapsed dramatically under the weight of his lethal deliveries. His ability
to dismiss three class players—Hashim Amla, Quinton de Kock, and JP Duminy—in
one over showcased a bowler of exceptional skill and temperament. Mustafiz
wasn’t just good; he had the makings of one of the all-time great left-arm
pacers.
Yet, in the
years that followed, Mustafiz’s trajectory began to align with cricket’s newest
paradigm—the franchise-driven, fast-paced world of Twenty20 cricket. While his
performances in leagues like the IPL garnered global attention, a deeper
question emerged: would the glittering lure of T20 cricket steer Mustafiz away
from the longer formats, where legends are truly forged?
The Allure and the Cost of T20 Leagues
There is no
denying the appeal of T20 cricket. It is quick, glamorous, and immensely
profitable, offering players global recognition in the blink of an eye.
Mustafiz’s success in the IPL, where his cutters became the talk of the
tournament, catapulted him into the global spotlight. Franchise teams in
England, Australia, and beyond began vying for his services. Bangladeshi fans,
long starved of global heroes, embraced his rise with unbridled
enthusiasm.
However, as
a cricket romantic, I find myself torn. T20 leagues, for all their excitement,
rarely mold players into enduring legends. Cricketing immortality is not
achieved through quick bursts of brilliance but through sustained excellence in
the crucible of Test cricket. The likes of Viv Richards, Imran Khan, Brian
Lara, and Wasim Akram are remembered not for their exploits in short-format
cricket but for their ability to dominate the game’s most challenging
format.
The
experience of senior West Indian players in T20 leagues serves as a cautionary
tale. While stars like Chris Gayle and Andre Russell have achieved phenomenal
success in franchise cricket, the West Indies' decline in Test cricket has been
stark and painful. Their prowess in T20 leagues has done little to revive the
fortunes of their national team, a stark reminder that T20 cricket, for all its
glamour, cannot replace the foundational rigors of first-class cricket.
The Crucible of First-Class Cricket
Mustafizur’s
immense talent deserves a stage where it can be nurtured and refined.
Unfortunately, T20 leagues, with their emphasis on instant results, offer
little room for the kind of technical and mental growth that first-class
cricket fosters. The likes of Kumar Sangakkara and Ajinkya Rahane understood
this well. Sangakkara chose the grind of County Cricket to elevate his game,
while Rahane turned to the Ranji Trophy to rediscover his form. These formats
test a cricketer’s patience, resilience, and adaptability—qualities essential
for success at the highest level.
For
Mustafizur, a stint in County Cricket could be transformative. The exposure to
different conditions, coupled with mentorship from seasoned coaches and
players, would help him evolve into a more complete bowler. Shakib Al Hasan’s
time at Worcestershire in 2010 is a testament to how such experiences can
elevate a player’s game. Shakib returned from County Cricket as a more mature
and versatile cricketer, and the same could be true for Mustafiz.
The Road Ahead
As Mustafiz
continues to dazzle in T20 leagues, the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) and his
well-wishers face a critical responsibility: to ensure that his talent is not
confined to the shortest format. He must be encouraged to embrace the
challenges of Test and first-class cricket, where his legacy can truly take
shape. A bowler of Mustafizur’s calibre deserves to be remembered not as a T20
specialist but as one of the game’s all-time greats.
Test
cricket remains the ultimate yardstick of greatness. While T20 cricket may
provide the fireworks, it is in the marathon of five-day cricket that true
legends are forged. Players like Viv Richards and Graeme Pollock continue to be
revered not because of their T20 exploits but because they excelled in the
format that demanded the most from them.
For Mustafizur Rahman, the path to immortality lies not in the glittering arenas of franchise cricket but in the quiet, grinding fields of first-class cricket. It is my fervent hope that he chooses this path, for it is only then that he can fulfil his immense potential and secure his place among the pantheon of cricketing greats.
Thursday, May 12, 2016
A Tribute to Tony Cozier: The Voice of the Caribbean Cricket Soul
As a young
listener, I was initially struck by an apparent paradox: a white West Indian
commentator. My youthful assumptions had painted the Caribbean cricketing
identity as synonymous with its predominantly Black players and fans. Yet, Tony
shattered those narrow notions. He was not merely an observer of West Indian
cricket but its soulful custodian, deeply entwined with its spirit. Over time,
I came to realize that Tony Cozier wasn’t just different—he was
exceptional.
During the
1992 World Cup, his commentary reflected a deep-rooted connection to the West
Indies team. His anguish and exasperation when the West Indies lost to South
Africa were palpable, resonating with the collective despair of fans. Tony was
not an impartial commentator. He wore his allegiance on his sleeve, embodying
the highs and lows of West Indies cricket like few others could. This passion
was again evident during the Frank Worrell Trophy in 1992-93, where he voiced
unshakable confidence in a Caribbean revival. For Tony, as for countless fans,
cricket wasn’t merely a sport—it was a lifeblood.
Tony’s
voice was evocative, conjuring the warmth of sunlit Caribbean beaches and the
rhythm of its culture. His words carried the essence of the islands,
transporting listeners to a world where cricket was more than a game—it was an
identity. When the West Indies’ reign as cricket’s undisputed kings came to an
end in 1995, losing at home to Australia after more than a decade, it felt like
witnessing the fall of an empire. I have no doubt that Tony mourned alongside
every West Indian fan.
Even during
the decline of West Indies cricket in the post-Richards era, Tony’s commentary
carried the echoes of the golden days. He was candid in his criticisms of the
West Indies Cricket Board (WICB) and the emerging crop of players who seemed
detached from the legacy they inherited. Yet, beneath his frustrations, there
was an enduring hope—a belief that the West Indies would one day reclaim their
rightful place at the pinnacle of world cricket.
Tony Cozier
was not just a chronicler of cricket; he was a witness to its evolution. He
observed the game transition from the elegance of Test matches to the fast-paced
allure of Twenty20 leagues, often lamenting the encroachment of commercialism
on cricket’s soul. His commentary served as a bridge between cricket’s golden
past and its uncertain future.
Tony has
left us, but his legacy endures. His words, his passion, and his unwavering
love for Caribbean cricket will remain etched in our memories. As the sun sets
on his illustrious career, we bid farewell to a man whose voice was the
heartbeat of West Indies cricket.
Rest in peace, Tony Cozier. May your spirit continue to inspire cricket lovers worldwide, reminding us of a time when the game was as soulful as the Caribbean breeze.




